photo projects editionPrevious thread>>4389099/fgt/ daily reminder (courtesy by anon): one stop per decade is (generally) bullshit>negative film ages better than positive>black and white better than color>slow films better than fast>storage conditions (dry/cool) matter more than years>Negative film is shot 1 or 2 stops overexposed and then PULLED in development so that you build more density in the exposure and develop less such that the fog is limited>slide/positive film is shot at box speed or overexposed and pulled.>if you home develop you can also use benzotriazole as a restrainer for the the first developer in E6 processUseful links>[massive dev chart] gives times for home film developmenthttps://www.digitaltruth.com/devchart.php>[film dev] shows results of development regimeshttps://filmdev.org/>[news & community links]35mmc.comcasualphotophile.comkosmofoto.comemulsive.orgjapancamerahunter.com>thread questionwhat changed in how you approach photography over this year?
>>4392082I'll use the massive dev chart app as welland probably a bluetooth earbud in one ear to listen to music and get the sound notifications from the appfirst one sheet to see if everything works finethen I'll try doing the other 5 sheets divided in 2 sessions: one with 2 sheets and the next one with 3 sheets if the previous 2 come out finebtw question for LF fags>focus on near, swing/tilt on faror>focus on far, swing/tilt on near?because I've heard both and don't know which it istried focusing on near and swinging to get the farthest point as well, doing this back and forth some 3 or 4 after trying and giving up and getting everything back to zero some 3 times, of courseit's my first time doing this, but I think it worked outcould be better, I believe, because I tried swinging while also having the monorail sloped down[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSONYCamera ModelILCE-6300Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Camera Raw 16.5 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.0Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2024:12:14 09:00:57Exposure Time1/40 secExposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating100Brightness0.5 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceOtherFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryColor Space InformationUncalibratedRenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandardContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormal
>>4392096anyway, any tips for how to combine movements? e.g. swing and tiltwill post some photos from a recent tripanyone feel free to offer criticism[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSONYCamera ModelILCE-6300Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Camera Raw 16.5 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.0Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2024:12:14 09:04:39Exposure Time1/80 secExposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating100Brightness0.9 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceOtherFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryColor Space InformationUncalibratedRenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandardContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormal
>>4392097>dyptich in OP is also mine[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSONYCamera ModelILCE-6300Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Camera Raw 16.5 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.0Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2024:12:14 09:19:09Exposure Time1/60 secExposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating100Brightness1.4 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceOtherFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryColor Space InformationUncalibratedRenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandardContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormal
>>4392098[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSONYCamera ModelILCE-6300Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Camera Raw 16.5 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.0Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2024:12:14 11:27:39Exposure Time1/30 secExposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating100Brightness0.2 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceOtherFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryColor Space InformationUncalibratedRenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandardContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormal
>>4392099[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSONYCamera ModelILCE-6300Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Camera Raw 16.5 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.0Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2024:12:14 09:40:59Exposure Time1/40 secExposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating100Brightness0.3 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceOtherFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryColor Space InformationUncalibratedRenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandardContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormal
>>4392096>>4392097It all essentially comes down to visualizing/understanding the schiempflug principle. I think starting at nearest object in focus works a little better, but either way probably works. Also one thing to keep in mind is that you should open your aperture all the way while finding your focal plane and then stopping down once you get your movements all set.If you aren't obsessed with maximum sharpness and don't mind losing a stop or two to smaller apertures it is worth checking a calculator to see if your hyperfocal distance gets everything you want in focus without movements.One thing I have noticed using my clear glass back standard is that you still need to focus on distant subject at higher apertures carefully if you want them very sharp. I have also noticed that heat/atmospheric effects will often destroy all fine sharpness.Another interesting observation I've noticed is that DoF is actually more of a gradient that trails into unsharpness rather than a hard stop. Maybe obvious, but the calculators give you specific distances and it only sorta works like that...Nice pics btw. I like >>4392096 best.
Judge me /fgt/[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeFUJI PHOTO FILM CO., LTD.Camera ModelSP-3000Camera SoftwareFDi V4.5 / FRONTIER355/375-1.8-0E-016Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationLeft-Hand, BottomHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2024:12:12 12:55:56Color Space InformationsRGBImage Width3625Image Height2433
dev'd my first roll of IR film bros. IR gets some cool results for how easy the photo process is (attach filter and adjust exposure accordingly)[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATIONCamera ModelNIKON D5100Camera SoftwareAdobe Lightroom 10.1.0 (Android)Maximum Lens Aperturef/3.6Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaColor Filter Array Pattern816Focal Length (35mm Equiv)60 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2024:12:14 14:43:07Exposure Time1/20 secF-Numberf/8.0Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating100Lens Aperturef/8.0Exposure Bias1.3 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length40.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlNoneContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
>>4392106same composition for comparison
>>4392105[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeFUJI PHOTO FILM CO., LTD.Camera ModelSP-3000Camera SoftwareFDi V4.5 / FRONTIER355/375-1.8-0E-016Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2024:12:12 12:55:56Color Space InformationsRGBImage Width3625Image Height2433
>>4392108[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeFUJI PHOTO FILM CO., LTD.Camera ModelSP-3000Camera SoftwareFDi V4.5 / FRONTIER355/375-1.8-0E-016Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationLeft-Hand, BottomHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2024:12:12 12:56:30Color Space InformationsRGBImage Width3625Image Height2433
>>4392109[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeFUJI PHOTO FILM CO., LTD.Camera ModelSP-3000Camera SoftwareFDi V4.5 / FRONTIER355/375-1.8-0E-016Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2024:12:12 12:56:31Color Space InformationsRGBImage Width3625Image Height2433
>>4392110>>4392109>>4392108I think these may have been better if you got closer to the people.
>thread questiongetting deep into 4x5 with filters and such.
>>4392094>what changed in how you approach photography over this year?Realizing stuff I shot in 2022 looks way better than anything I've shot this year and large format has had a detrimental effect on me. Time to get back into the medium format game.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakePlustekCamera ModelOpticFilm 8200iCamera SoftwareGIMP 2.10.6Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution44 dpiVertical Resolution44 dpiImage Created2024:12:14 08:14:36Image Width6774Image Height10140
>>4392131>large format has had a detrimental effect on met. dog hair anon
>>4392133I'm extremely obsessed over meticulously cleaning my scans so I don't think you got the right guy.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeEPSONCamera ModelPerfection V800Camera SoftwareGIMP 2.10.6Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution296 dpiVertical Resolution296 dpiImage Created2023:10:10 19:36:24Image Width23446Image Height29706
>>4392101I was doing macro, is it easier or harder to align those planes of focus on macro than it is in the open?thanks for the compliment, btwwill post a couple more>>4392105only if you judge mine, desu>all the photos in the thread before yours>>4392105good light, sharp subject, it's "a cliché" shooting corner buildings but most photos like those are shit. You managed to have a nicely done one, I like itgreat colours too>>4392108I think this would benefit from being a little higher, covering less of the ground on the front, cutting off the first 4 lines of tiles and getting a little bit more space on topgood lighting as well, and nice contrast between inside and out (brute/delicate, grays and hi-vis orange/colourful, industrial/organic)>>4392109I like the place but for me it doesn't work out as a photo>>4392110this concrete slab on the front contributes nothing to the photoshould have gone closer to cut it out of framegood light and very comfy place, well executed shot but the subject is uninteresting to me personally>>4392131>large format has had a detrimental effect on mewould you mind sharing how?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSONYCamera ModelILCE-6300Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Camera Raw 16.5 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.0Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2024:12:14 10:58:11Exposure Time1/50 secExposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating100Brightness0.6 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceOtherFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryColor Space InformationUncalibratedRenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandardContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormal
>>4392108>>4392113first one works well as-is imo
>>4392194It gets a lot harder for macro once you start pushing higher magnifications. 1:1 is about the same once you've gotten a hang of it. There's some weird stuff that happens when you start tilting and swinging but recomposing is usually all you need to do. There will be a point if you keep increasing magnification where large swings of the focus dial won't look like they're doing anything. That is when you need to use clear glass + loupe.
>>4392194>would you mind sharing how?It made me become increasingly neurotic and hesitant, and I'd shoot less and less without getting anything in return. I love shooting color and large format color photography is world of hurt, taking a bad photo on an expensive sheet would scare me stiff and in the end I'd forgo a promising scene and shoot something bland as fuck instead. And it made me want to head out less because it was always such a pain in the ass hauling all that junk along, which is why I feel I haven't gotten anything done in the last few years. 90% of the shots I like taken with the view camera were shot with the 6x9 roll film back and not on sheet, so I might as well head back to doing picrel where I clearly belong. What do I even need all that resolution for, I don't even print shit.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationUnknown
>>4392229Large format can absolutely play mind games on you.
Kentmere 400 120I pushed that bitch to 3200 in XTOL because weather was trashvery grainy but kinda cool since it's 6x6this one shot f3.5 1/50s[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATIONCamera ModelNIKON D610Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 10.0 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/4.0Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaColor Filter Array Pattern844Focal Length (35mm Equiv)60 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2024:12:15 20:30:27Exposure Time1/45 secF-Numberf/9.5Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating100Lens Aperturef/9.5Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length60.00 mmColor Space InformationUncalibratedRenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlNoneContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessHardSubject Distance RangeUnknown
You can use a fresnel lens in front of your clear glass plate for framing and the image is super bright. Cool.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakesamsungCamera ModelGalaxy S24 UltraCamera SoftwareS928U1UEU4AXK4Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.7Focal Length (35mm Equiv)23 mmImage-Specific Properties:Compression SchemeJPEG Compression (Thumbnail)Image Height3000Image OrientationTop, Left-HandImage Created2024:12:15 13:00:05Vertical Resolution72 dpiHorizontal Resolution72 dpiImage Width4000Lens Aperturef/1.7Exposure Bias0 EVExposure ProgramNormal ProgramColor Space InformationUncalibratedUnique Image IDHK0XLQE00SMImage Height3000Brightness9.4 EVWhite BalanceAutoExposure ModeAutoExposure Time11/10000 secFlashNo FlashF-Numberf/1.7ISO Speed Rating12Image Width4000Focal Length6.30 mmMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageScene Capture TypeStandardLight SourceUnknown
>>4392258don't tell me you're gonna waste a shot on a window....
>>4392213hmm got itdoing macro and applying tilts and swings for the first time all at once was hard but I learned a lotwas using a good loupe but still with ground glass>>4392229got it, thanks for the honest responsethe "expensive" aspect of it makes me cautious not to make any mistakes, and I like doing everything carefully regardless if it's 35mm, medium format or now with large formatbut being cautious is not the same as being paranoidin the end it's just film, mansometimes you'll end up wasting itI made a mistake shooting slide in this last trip>see picrel[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSONYCamera ModelILCE-6300Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Camera Raw 16.5 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.0Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2024:12:14 10:14:47Exposure Time1/8 secExposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating100Brightness-2.0 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceOtherFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryColor Space InformationUncalibratedRenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandardContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormal
>>4392229I went almos 2 months without shooting with my RB67that >>4392264 was my first shot with it in the trip, and immediately after I shot it I saw I metered the light and everything but I didn't set the camera accordingly, so it was wildly underexposedit's 120 Ektachromein a 6x7, so 10 shots per rollshit's expensiveI just went "fuck, gotta be careful" and took another shot of the same scene now with the right settings>>4392100 this onethat's itdon't overthink it[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSONYCamera ModelILCE-6300Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Camera Raw 16.5 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.0Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2024:12:14 09:33:33Exposure Time1/50 secExposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating100Brightness0.6 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceOtherFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryColor Space InformationUncalibratedRenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandardContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormal
>>4392262No. I was setting up the camera and testing right there. Sheeps, water and trees today. I'm using my sharp 300mm lens to demonstrate the difference. Kind of a pain to use an 85mm equivalent for what I'm shooting, but that's part of the fun.
>>4392194Cheers anon, thanks for the feedback. Of yours I like >>4392100 the most, colours are great and the mountain range in the background gives it a nice feel.
>>4392281thanks, manI just remembered these two shots were a panorama that came out surprisingly well>>4392096>>4392097
>>4392302wtf came out yellow as fuckredid it properly
Another six from today. I feel like something went wrong with these because they aren't as sharp as I expected. Gotta do some testing. I'm still pretty happy with some them regardless.Using a fresnel without a ground glass is a little too imprecise and annoying. I will stick with the binocular reflex viewer and ground glass back for framing.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeEPSONCamera ModelPerfection V800Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.1 (Windows)Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2024:12:15 19:46:08Color Space InformationsRGB
Least favorite from today. I like the idea, but it's a bit of a mess.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeEPSONCamera ModelPerfection V800Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.1 (Windows)Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2024:12:15 19:44:50Color Space InformationsRGB
Might be cool rotated 90 degrees.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeEPSONCamera ModelPerfection V800Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.1 (Windows)Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2024:12:15 19:44:37Color Space InformationsRGB
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeEPSONCamera ModelPerfection V800Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.1 (Windows)Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2024:12:15 19:44:25Color Space InformationsRGB
This one might be my favorite.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeEPSONCamera ModelPerfection V800Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.1 (Windows)Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2024:12:15 19:43:40Color Space InformationsRGB
Last one. Hope I didn't damage your corneas too badly. I think that the sharpness issue is from either the old film holders I'm using or the ground glass back may have poor tolerances compared to the more modern sinar I'm used to using. I've gotten significantly sharper images at similar apertures with this lens and film combo. New camera, new problems, fun.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeEPSONCamera ModelPerfection V800Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.1 (Windows)Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2024:12:15 19:42:41Color Space InformationsRGB
>>4392258put some gridlines on that shit holy fuck
>>4392389I have them on the ground glass that I normally use for framing, but you can only view the image with a loupe through clear glass for critical focus. The grid lines just get in the way at that point.
>first time shooting large format>first time trying out D-76>first time tray developing>decided to go all in and do all the 6 sheets I've shotmiraculously everything came out perfectly fineeven after forgetting the stop bath because my water tray was in the wrong positionshuffling was surprisingly easyI'm excited to get it digitized, and will make contact sheets if everything is good (focus etc.)[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera ModelRedmi Note 8 ProEquipment MakeXiaomiImage-Specific Properties:Image Width4624Image Height2136Image OrientationTop, Left-HandImage Created2024:12:16 02:57:06F-Numberf/1.9Exposure Time3333/100000 secFocal Length5.43 mmFlashNo FlashISO Speed Rating861Image Height2136Image Width4624Lens Aperturef/1.9
>>4392420do all the 6 sheets *at once
>>4392420heck yeah[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareGIMP 2.10.38Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2024:12:09 23:29:54Color Space InformationsRGB
>>4392306nice
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Lightroom 10.0.2 (iOS)Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2024:12:11 18:01:07Color Space InformationsRGBImage Width848Image Height1280Scene Capture TypeStandard
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Lightroom 10.0.2 (iOS)Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2024:12:16 09:42:07Color Space InformationsRGBImage Width848Image Height1280Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>4392444Why would you ever waste film by taking pictures of niggers?
>shoot digital>long for the character of film>shoot film>carry a compact digital with similar focal length too, for contingency>shoot the same scenes with both cameras>decide to carry a larger digital to improve the contingency images>ditch film because the load becomes troublesome>shoot digital>long for the character of film
>>4392456be careful not to cut yourself on those edges>>4392443>>4392444beautiful, mani just feel like the black man is a bit washed outfeels like it could be in an ad campaign on Vogue
>>4392467Thanks! I did notice it looking a bit washed when I saw it in big on the computer.I prefer the outcome of the film roll rather than the digital ones.>>4392456Thanks that made me laugh[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Lightroom 10.0.2 (iOS)Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2024:12:11 17:38:47Color Space InformationsRGBImage Width848Image Height1280Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>4392473>I prefer the outcome of the film roll rather than the digital onesare those slides or are you wetprinting them?
>>4392493just slides
anyone tried meme films? heading back home for christmas and going to see some old friends, thought maybe some psychedelic blues or revolog with the interesting effects might make for nice prints but I guess i'd like to know that the box speed is semireliable or if the effects look as decent as they seem to on the promos
>>4392511I had fun with some expired fuji or photolabo ones
>>4392467Tried to play with the blacks[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Lightroom 10.0.2 (iOS)Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2024:12:16 19:02:00Color Space InformationsRGBImage Width848Image Height1280Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>4392530woah they're people too, manjeez
>>4392533kek
>>4392465>shoot medium format>carry a m43 as a light meter and for worthless snapshitsworks for me
>>4392456Kodak literally invented ektar specifically for taking photos of niggers you jive ass cracka mofuckin FOO. Mo like you wasting perfectly good nigga film takin pictures of flowers.
>>4392546this but unironically depending of the skin tones you are trying to photograph: Crackas = PortraSpics/Chinks = Gold, Pro Image NIGGERS = Ektar
>>4392548Ektar and slide filmpretty much all slide films get along absurdly well with darker skin tones
what would lads suggest for shooting the Xmas season: Tri-X pushed to 800 or 5222 pushed to 400, both can be deved with Rodinal or Tmax Developer
>>4392570I prefer Double-x over Tri-x, and you can comfortably push it to 800so i'd go with 5222 @800, since you'll probably mostly shoot indoors
>>4392581alright, I'll try 5222 @800 in my Olympus 35RC
Bros I splurged 2k on a home scanning setup, am I cooked?
>>4392593Yes. You could have gotten an awesome darkroom setup and lots of paper for that price.
Do you have a p&s? I got this one for free and have enjoyed using it[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeGoogleCamera ModelPixel 7 ProCamera SoftwareHDR+ 1.0.540104767zdhSensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)24 mmMaximum Lens Aperturef/1.9Image-Specific Properties:Image Width2600Image Height1902Image Created2024:12:07 15:00:55Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiISO Speed Rating42Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramF-Numberf/1.9Exposure Time353/1000000 secSubject Distance RangeMacroSharpnessNormalFocal Length6.81 mmFlashNo Flash, CompulsorySaturationNormalContrastNormalMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageScene Capture TypeStandardSubject Distance0.15 mExposure Bias0 EVImage Height2268White BalanceAutoBrightness9.5 EVImage Width4032Exposure ModeAutoLens Aperturef/1.9Color Space InformationsRGBRenderingCustom
and a few sample images[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSONYCamera ModelILCE-7RM4AFocal Length (35mm Equiv)70 mmImage-Specific Properties:Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating64Metering ModePatternLight SourceDaylightFlashNo FlashWhite BalanceManual
>>4392605[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSONYCamera ModelILCE-7RM4AFocal Length (35mm Equiv)70 mmImage-Specific Properties:Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating64Metering ModePatternLight SourceDaylightFlashNo FlashWhite BalanceManual
>>4392607some of these got camera scanned and some just the cheap lab job
>>4392608
>>4392609
>>4392610[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSONYCamera ModelILCE-7RM4AFocal Length (35mm Equiv)70 mmImage-Specific Properties:Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating64Metering ModePatternLight SourceDaylightFlashNo FlashWhite BalanceManual
hi anons so I bought a minolta xg1 at the thrift store recently. it was shooting fine until I got about halfway through my roll. I'll take a pic and the shutter will open right away but take like 2 seconds to close. i'm sure it's a relatively simple fix but i'm a noob and don't know if i should just rewind my roll and try to clean it or if it's another reason. here's a pic from my shitty vivitar ic 101
>>4392605what film? It's got phoenix vibes but sharper. Love me some phoenix>>4392613>i'm sure it's a relatively simple fixlol why? Put a fresh battery in that's the only "simple fix." If that don't do it it's probably fucked
>>4392614i had new batteries in it at the start of the roll and it was fine do they go that fast?
>>4392614
>>4392615no it's probably fucked>>4392617ah nice I got some of that in the fridge, I should shoot it
>>4392094I'm not sure how bad of an idea it is to get into film photography and flash photography at the same time (coming from digital)But I've got a Minolta SRT101 from eBay that came with a Brilliant 505 flash.I wanted to take some pics at our New Years celebration, but that's going to be indoors and my 200 film would need stupid long exposure times according the the camera's light meter, so I figured I might aswell bring the flash.My question is, how do I meter correctly for the flash? It has a little wheel on the back (see this random video, I can't upload a pic of it right now) but I'm not sure if that's for metering or how it workshttps://youtu.be/SSBbn0pwCk8?t=21I don't mind if my pictures are a bit overexposed, it'll be my first roll of film after all, but I'd still like to try my best to get it right.
>>4392420Nice. How was it?
>>4392619Can't see the sensor on the flash but seems to be a thyristor one, meaning that the little dial will be everything that you need to adjust. Look for the DIN equivalent (I can't see on the video if it has ASA/ISO) of your film speed, set the aperture for the distance you want to cover with the flash based on the dial and remember to set your camera to the flash sync speed.That is.
>>4392619push the fuck out of your film if its black and white. idk how color works.
>>4392623pretty easy, actuallyI tought i was gonna get scratches everywhere and fucked up emulsions from touching it when developing but it's nice turning on the lights and finding out everything worked out just fineI'll take more care with lightsources next timeThe bathroom LED bulb keeps a barely perceptible light on even when off, probably a fucking capacitor in itI'll change the lightbulb and if it continues I'll just remove it whenever I develop filmI went to the shop today to get it all scanned
>>4392619>read both your camera's and your flash's manual>make sure the camera works>shoot a roll with it before new year celebration to see if it works, check for lightleaks and get used to it>shoot said roll using flash under light conditions similar to those you'll have in NYEfiddling with a camera you've never used before in a medium you're not familiar with while also using a flash you don't even know how it works in fucking new year's eve is pretty much asking for a shitty day with shitty results
>>4392604My Olympus XA2 is my baby[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width2433Image Height3637
Im gonna fking do it brehs!I found this Mamiya RB67 with a 90mm and a 180mm lense plus another sd pro back for like 1000$. Can’t wait to buy this brick and slam it in a tripod
>>4392671That's not it, it's becase there's a live wire running alongside a disconnected wire, which is inducting small amount of current in the disconnected one. A capacitor wouldn't last more than a few seconds at most.
>>4392570XX @ 800 in Tmax dev is fantastic. Pic related >>4392689Love the xa2[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Trying Negative Lab Pro. It fucks up normal Lightroom sliders after conversion. Does it really limit you to only using the adjustment sliders in the plugin window?
>>4392788got itI'll either remove the lamp or cover it, thendidn't have any fogging or anything but I won't risk it
>>4392806after conversion, export to TIFF. Then you can edit it normally in lightroom
>>4392099I was looking directly at the slide with a good quality loupe and was genuinely impressed by the image qualitynot to be a pixelpeeping faggot (or grainpeeping faggot in this case), but look at the scan >>4392099, which is already great, and look at picrelthe image is shit because my phone's camera is shit, but you can clearly see what time is it in the tower clock when looking at the positive with a loupemy scans are all high quality, and I knew it still couldn't reach the level of detail we see on film, but I thought the difference was minimalI've recently bought a good loupe for LF focusing, and just got my 6x7 positives back and holy fucking shitBeen shooting film for almost 10 years and never seen positives under magnification, it's absurd
>>4392800what time do you use for Tmax dev? MDC doesn't have an 800 iso listed :/
Not really a series,[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeEPSONCamera ModelPerfection V700/V750Camera SoftwareAdobe Lightroom 10.1.0 (Android)Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2024:12:17 12:11:25Color Space InformationsRGB
but I've done this with quite a few scenes.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeEPSONCamera ModelPerfection V700/V750Camera SoftwareAdobe Lightroom 10.1.0 (Android)Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2024:12:17 12:12:09Color Space InformationsRGB
>>4392861slides are something, sucks they are bitch to develop at home and it takes 6 fucking weeks to develop them where I live
>>4392888>they are bitch to develop at homeIt's not that hard. The only thing that sucks is the poor shelf life of the chemistry
>>4392888same, where I live there are only 2 labs that do E6one of them is run by a guy who keeps making excuses for constant delays, and the other one is run by a guy who does a great job but it takes like 2 weeks to get them developed and uses a Noritsu to scan themso i take my slides for the last guy to develop and then take it to another lab to get them scannedwhich means 3 weeks to get itand this >>4392909not only it's a pain in the ass but I also don't shoot enough slides for home developing to be worth it
>>4392869MDC has this recommendations page that covers T-Max push processinghttps://www.digitaltruth.com/devchart.php?doc=pushprocTMax Films> 1 stop push = no change> 2 stop push = (x1.33)> 3 stop push = (x1.66)
>>4392671That's good to hear your film came out without scratches! I had a couple issues with 8x10 tray dev thst I solved by putting a small piece of printing paper underneath the film. Total chance discovery, but it works!I was talking more about shooting large format for the first time!
dark and cold and sad[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATIONCamera ModelNIKON D610Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 10.0 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/4.0Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaColor Filter Array Pattern844Focal Length (35mm Equiv)60 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2024:12:17 23:26:44Exposure Time1/30 secF-Numberf/9.5Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating100Lens Aperturef/9.5Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length60.00 mmColor Space InformationUncalibratedRenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlNoneContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessHardSubject Distance RangeUnknown
>>4392925>> 1 stop push = no change1 stop push = no push?must be written by javashit devs
Did some testing with my new brass lens. Dallmeyer rapid rectilinear, roughly 1860-1910 was when it was made.No aperture or focal length info on it. Determined it is around 750mm focal length, wide open it is f11, and with the one aperture slide it reduces down to around f32-f40ish.Four shots, two scenes with and without aperture slide in place. Delta 100 @ 50, rodinal 1:50 rotary developer for 10 mins.First one is wide open.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeEPSONCamera ModelPerfection V800Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.1 (Windows)Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2024:12:17 14:48:11Color Space InformationsRGB
>>4392938even with rodinal its low contrast and the chickens are literally glowingyou mistakenly bought a portrait lens but like for women not dogs send it back
>>4392938With aperture slide in place. The lens was fogging up like crazy, which is why this one has that haze on it. Older lenses are quite soft wide open, but sharpen up very nicely when you stop them down. The difference is quite dramatic as you can see. Really really good quality all things considered. This lens will easily cover 8x10 as well.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeEPSONCamera ModelPerfection V800Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.1 (Windows)Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2024:12:17 14:56:36Color Space InformationsRGB
Second shot wide open. Kinda cool. >>4392940The lens was fogging in like 2 seconds after I put it back on camera there isn't actually any glow or only very minimal, and rodinal at 1+50 is naturally low contrast, yah goober.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeEPSONCamera ModelPerfection V800Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.1 (Windows)Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2024:12:17 15:04:27Color Space InformationsRGB
Last one. I forgot to close my shutter before pulling the film slide out, so this is MASSIVELY over exposed. Probably about 10 seconds when it should have been 1/4 of a second. The scanner was unhappy, but I kinda really like the shot for what it is.I really like this lens a lot. Gotta try some macro with it. :D[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeEPSONCamera ModelPerfection V800Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.1 (Windows)Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2024:12:17 15:14:05Color Space InformationsRGB
>>4392931>dark and cold and sadwow that's exactly how my life feels
>>4392947What's getting you down?
Hey fgts, any tips for developing 30+ year old E-4 slides? Had some success with room temp C-41 and ~4 stops of overexposure but it's obviously still pretty fucked. Should I try getting C-22 chems for my last roll or is this as usable as it gets? (pretty sure E-4 will just not turn out at all, so I'm doing negs) Film is the early IE ektachrome 2443[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeFUJIFILMCamera ModelX-T30Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 12.1 (Windows)Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)135 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2024:08:17 13:52:45Exposure Time1/125 secF-Numberf/1.0Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating1000Lens Aperturef/1.0Brightness-1.1 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length90.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandardSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
>>4392306you color corrected the south american-ness of the image :D beautiful btw
>finally give in and stop autistically obsessing over making negative scans free of every little micron of dust>suddenly free to enjoy film photography againdog hair anon... my sensei... arigatou.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakePlustekCamera ModelOpticFilm 135iCamera Softwaredarktable 4.8.1Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandImage Created2024:12:17 17:55:11Color Space InformationsRGBImage Width1200Image Height1800
>>4392989>dog hair anon... my sensei... arigatou.nice try dog hair anon we know it's you
>>4392929I got 5 trays and only after buying them I saw there were barbs in the bottom that would certainly scratch the sheets, so I got 5 other trays and will use the first ones for gardeningthe new ones are pretty smooth, everything worked out fine (:about the photos, the first one was pretty hard because I was shooting a lit up building at night, so the light was really dim and it was hard to focus (I didn't have a loupe yet)the day after that I shot 3 sheets of my friends hanging out togethersome 5 days later I shot another 2 sheets of a chocolate that has a really nice texture to test how movements work while also doing macro for the first timeI mean, I've shot macro on 35mm with a proper macro lens and shit but shooting LF macro is WAY differenttook one photo at f8 and the other at f64 to check both the ultrathin DoF and extra thicc DoF of glorious f64and then a couple days later I developed them all at once in the tray>D76 1+2 at 20ºC for 15'15"did this at like 3am, so after hanging the sheets I went to sleep and left them to drythe morning after I woke up, put the sheets in a printfile and went straight to the lab to get it scannedI'll post everything as soon as I get them back!>>4392977kekok I'm bringing the south american-ness back with this beautiful golden hour shotthe partially built (and half-lit) stadium at the bottom reminded me of Akira[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSONYCamera ModelILCE-6300Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Camera Raw 16.5 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.0Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Right-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2024:12:15 12:11:28Exposure Time1/40 secExposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating100Brightness0.4 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceOtherFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryColor Space InformationUncalibratedRenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandardContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormal
>>4392996correction: I just checked it on google maps and that's actually a TV broadcastit looks a lot like half a stadium though[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSONYCamera ModelILCE-6300Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Camera Raw 16.5 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.0Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Right-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2024:12:15 12:03:37Exposure Time1/20 secExposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating100Brightness-0.2 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceOtherFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryColor Space InformationUncalibratedRenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandardContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormal
>>4392996Awesome! You've ran into many of the struggles with view cameras so far, more to come. :D If you think you'll be doing a lot of low light stuff get a fresnel if you don't have one, and possibly a better GG if it seems dim. Fresnel makes it much brighter, but can get in the way of focusing a bit. I don't like them, but ymmv.Macro LF is very different from all other shooting, but also kinda the same as smaller format macro. The way I like to think of it is the bellows extension you set is your magnification. After you have your desired magnification you move either subject or camera to get into rough focus. After that you use the rear standard for fine focus and the front standard for coarse focus. You can use the rear standard just as well as the front for focal plane manipulation and it can be very convenient if your bellows extension make the front standard too far to reach. Also get that clear glass back standard!!!! >>4392989Absolutely based. Now you can focus that autism on something cool like super high magnification LF macro. Believe it or not this little 25mm lens has enough coverage to shoot 8x10 at about 15x-20x magnification. Pic is around 10x on 4x5. On an 8x10 the 35mm equivalent is 3mm focal length lol.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakesamsungCamera ModelGalaxy S24 UltraCamera SoftwareS928U1UEU4AXK4Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.7Focal Length (35mm Equiv)23 mmImage-Specific Properties:Compression SchemeJPEG Compression (Thumbnail)Image Height3000Image OrientationTop, Left-HandImage Created2024:12:17 19:27:03Vertical Resolution72 dpiHorizontal Resolution72 dpiImage Width4000Lens Aperturef/1.7Exposure Bias0 EVExposure ProgramNormal ProgramColor Space InformationUncalibratedUnique Image IDHK0XLQE00SMImage Height3000Brightness1.2 EVWhite BalanceAutoExposure ModeAutoExposure Time83/10000 secFlashNo FlashF-Numberf/1.7ISO Speed Rating500Image Width4000Focal Length6.30 mmMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageScene Capture TypeStandardLight SourceUnknown
>>4392989>the scanner noise>6 stops dynamic rangewhy even spend money on film if its going to look like a nikon coolpix
>>4393004It does not matter because his scans are merely a more convenient contact sheet/organizational method for when he makes his prints! Duh!
35mm...home[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakePlustekCamera ModelOpticFilm 8200iCamera SoftwareGIMP 2.10.6Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution44 dpiVertical Resolution44 dpiImage Created2024:12:16 19:53:01Image Width10224Image Height6792
>>4392999>You've ran into many of the struggles with view cameras so far, more to come. :Dkek yeah I feel like this is only the beginning, but I'm loving all of it thus faradds a sense of novelty to the very act of shooting, which is something I haven't had for some timeI mean, it's been almost exactly a year since I got my Mamiya RB67, which is also a beast of its ownit has a very particular way of shooting, even though I was already very familiar with medium format since my first ever camera was a TLRbut LF is like they released photography 2I'm excited to go out and shoot a beautiful tree from a park nearby tomorrow morning if I can get up on time
>>4393006>for when he makes the prints>color filmNo one on /p/ has done this
>>4393009Yeah! I like how view cameras simplify everything down so much, but with the simplicity is a world of autism and added complexity to taking snapshits. Worth it for the prints, and it's fun. I love taking 6 sheets out and just spending a couple hours shooting them, developing them all in a tank and scanning. It's relaxing, but also a lot more engaging for me than handheld cameras.>>4393010There's that one guy who printed those pics of the black girl. Sometime next year I'll be doing color prints, hopefully. I've been waiting on my contractor guy to have free time to build the room that will be my darkroom. Going to have over 10x the space of my current 16 sq.ft darkroom tent.
Gonna send my first roll off to development soon. I heard people saying that you should send it to a professional studio instead of your local drug store and I understand the reasons for that (even though I'm gonna assume it's not worth the money on my first few rolls)What I'm curious about is if a professional studio will just do better scans or if the development itself is also different? If I get my negatives back from the drug store and there is one photo I really like can't I just make a better scan of that myself in the future or something?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2024:12:13 02:33:00Color Space InformationsRGBImage Width1907Image Height1733Scene Capture TypeStandard
>fuck up and take half-frame shot in portrait when i should have went with landscape>attempt to salvage framing by cropping in to landscape, demolishing visual resolution in the processi am a visionary pioneering the 35mm equivalent of micro four thirds>>4393014>If I get my negatives back from the drug storeread these words in isolation then do your homework to make damn sure that "if" is for sure a "when" before your hand over your film. CVS (and probably every other major chain) will mail your film off to a central processing center to be developed, scanned, and then disposed of all in one go.>>4393004>why even spend money on film if its going to look like a nikon coolpixso i'm free to take photos without a screen beckoning me to immediately review what i've just shot in case something spoiled it and i need to reshoot. there's also the added bonus of using a purely mechanical camera which doesn't rely on batteries that need charging or tons of esoteric electronic components that are impossible to service.for what it's worth though i do find charm in early digishit photos, i like being able to see the world through the eyes of different technologies. i have no interest in capturing the world as my own eyes see it.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakePlustekCamera ModelOpticFilm 135iCamera Softwaredarktable 4.8.1Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandImage Created2024:12:17 22:29:38Color Space InformationsRGBImage Width1800Image Height1200
>>4393012yes, everything is taken to its absolute basic, but then you have control over every single thingso yes, it's possible to take a very conventional photo with a large format camera, but if you wanna experiment with any aspect of it you'll also be able to do soI'll have like 3 hours of sleep because I was cutting up the 35mm positives to put them in the slide holders and then kinda cataloguing themand now I already wanna shoot 4x5 slides[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSONYCamera ModelILCE-6300Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Camera Raw 16.5 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.0Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Right-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2024:12:14 11:12:58Exposure Time1/40 secExposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating100Brightness0.5 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceOtherFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryColor Space InformationUncalibratedRenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandardContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormal
>>4393009I just bought a RB67 yesterday, any tips? Mainly for portraits and to be set on a tripod.
>>4393024read the entire manual thoroughly at least oncelearn all the steps and repeat it until you do it automatically>cock the shutter>compose the shot focus>read the metering>set the time and aperture>remove the dark slide>shoot>insert the dark slideadditionally>remove and replace the backs every shot>learn to check if properly attached>learn how to shoot with cable release>ALWAYS keep your mirror lock-up dial set "off". Only ever set it to mirror lock-up when you're actually using it and with the cable release attachedthat's it, you gotta have your personal routine with itit's a complex camera and you gotta use it and see how it works for youeveryone has their own way of having a consisent procedure with itin the end it all comes down to having a specific workflow that you feel comfortable with
>>4393024Throw the manual out and start fucking with it. What the hell are words ever gonna teach you? Reading, thats all, so start using it right away you'll get the hang of it faster than any manual will.Why do they even call it a manual? If I wanted to get started easy I'd get an AUTOMATIC!
>>4393045Still drunk from your Tuesday bender?
>>4393017>make damn sure that "if" is for sure a "when" before your hand over your filmI'll double check when it's time, but I'm fairly certain. A friend of mine said it's one of the option you get to tick when sending them your film
>>4393046Just as drunk as ur mom got after she saw u plop out of her womb
>get first b&w roll deved and scannedI get it now[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSONYCamera ModelILCE-7RM4AFocal Length (35mm Equiv)70 mmImage-Specific Properties:Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating64Metering ModePatternLight SourceDaylightFlashNo FlashWhite BalanceManual
>>4393057[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSONYCamera ModelILCE-7RM4AMaximum Lens Aperturef/2.8Focal Length (35mm Equiv)70 mmImage-Specific Properties:Exposure Time1/30 secF-Numberf/8.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating64Lens Aperturef/8.0Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceDaylightFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length70.00 mmWhite BalanceManualContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormal
Man, work's been so rough I don't even enjoy my down time. I don't even want to take photos or paint or anything.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Lightroom 10.1.0 (Android)Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2024:12:18 10:49:43Color Space InformationsRGB
>>4393058[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSONYCamera ModelILCE-7RM4AFocal Length (35mm Equiv)70 mmImage-Specific Properties:Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating64Metering ModePatternLight SourceDaylightFlashNo FlashWhite BalanceManual
>>4393061[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSONYCamera ModelILCE-7RM4AFocal Length (35mm Equiv)70 mmImage-Specific Properties:Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating64Metering ModePatternLight SourceDaylightFlashNo FlashWhite BalanceManual
>>4393062[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSONYCamera ModelILCE-7RM4AFocal Length (35mm Equiv)70 mmImage-Specific Properties:Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating64Metering ModePatternLight SourceDaylightFlashNo FlashWhite BalanceManual
>>4393063[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSONYCamera ModelILCE-7RM4AFocal Length (35mm Equiv)70 mmImage-Specific Properties:Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating64Metering ModePatternLight SourceDaylightFlashNo FlashWhite BalanceManual
>>4393064[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSONYCamera ModelILCE-7RM4AFocal Length (35mm Equiv)70 mmImage-Specific Properties:Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating64Metering ModePatternLight SourceDaylightFlashNo FlashWhite BalanceManual
>>4393045True but asking could also avoid some me some stupid mistake that I would have to learn the hard way. I’m just really excited to use that camera!
>>4393077You are smarter and less of an alcoholic than Mr.Fucker. Fact.
>>4393077im just being a shithead dw, hope u have fun with your new cam
>>4393022feeling like an addictwent out to shoot this morning, then headed to work and now I can't wait to get home and develop my stufftook 4 more sheets today, and I believe they'll come out really goodI was planning on shooting this tree in large format for a month before I even got the camerawill develop it all in Rodinal
>>4393059understandablepainting is for women and photography is a feminine hobbynonetheless, whats up at work anon?
>>4393059Sucks to hear anon. Hope work improves or you can at least find joy in the hobbies again.
>>4393085No worries, I get that you’re still on edge from the shit flinging session in sugars nikkon thread.
>>4392948life
first photo on my olympus xa with a broken shutter needle and dead rangefinder patch. I'm really digging this film vibe...[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNORITSU KOKICamera ModelEZ ControllerCamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 14.0.1 (Windows)Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2024:12:10 12:41:16Color Space InformationsRGB
I wanna make some contact prints but only have Rodinal and D76 for developingwould it be possible to use them as paper developer?I haven't found any info online ):may buy dektol tomorrow, I just wanna scratch that itch for now[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSONYCamera ModelILCE-6300Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Camera Raw 16.5 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.0Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Right-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2024:12:14 11:16:15Exposure Time1/40 secExposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating100Brightness0.6 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceOtherFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryColor Space InformationUncalibratedRenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandardContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormal
>>4393144you CAN use rodinal but at that point youre wasting rodinal. i've seen 1+10 or 1+25 used. why not just get ilford multigrade? best paper developer currently especially since you can use it 1+14. try d76. someone said it takes longer than normal but it works.
>>4393144I had the same temptation. Just buy the dektol. It is incredibly cheap. I kept it in 4 or 5 1L bottles so I could mix a full packet of the powder.Remember that it only lasts for like a day. I would use like 400ml in an 8x10 tray lol. Just swish it up well enough and it eventually covers your paper.Sadly contact sheets are quite inconvenient these days because the 6 shot archival sheets don't fit the paper well. You want the taller and skinnier. Same deal with 120 rolls. 4x5 sheets that fit 4 work well at least.
>>4393147at what dilution? 1+1?probably just 150ml will be enough>why not just get ilford multigrade? best paper developer currently especially since you can use it 1+14I just wanna mess with contact printing in my bathroom tonight for funright after I posted I bought D72 (Dektol) and F24 fixer online from a local lab, but it'll only arrive between january 3rd and 8thwhich is not a problem either, since I'll only have access to a proper lab after january 6th
>>4393153im not entirely sure. you should try it out.>dektol and F24youre really stuck on kodak chems lmaoi really like tf-5 for my fixer both prints and films. low wash times and not smelly.
>>4393149>Just buy the dektol. It is incredibly cheap.I just bought it, it's not about the price, it's about wanting to make contact prints immediately from the photos I took earlier today (:unfortunately the paper I have is 5x7 and I'll make 4x5 printsso I'll cut off those edges and use them as test strips>>4393158>youre really stuck on kodak chems lmaois there a problem?>genuine questionit's actually a local lab that sells all the compounds of the original Kodak formulas and you mix them together, it's funanyway, Ilford chemicals are not very readily available where I liveat least not for cheap, but I'll look into this Ilford multigrade
>>4393160>is there a problem?no not at all.>it's actually a local lab that sells all the compounds of the original Kodak formulas and you mix them togetherif you can get sodium sulfite and metol you can make d23.100g sodium sulfite7.5g metol1 litersame times and speed/graininess as d76, but without d76's tendency to block highlights.i prefer a two bath solutionbath a:80g sodium sulfite6.5g metolbath b:12g sodium metaborateno prewetting, 4.5 minutes in each bath @ 20C. no rinse between solutions, immateutly into fixer after bath b.can reuse both solutions up to 10 rolls of films (10 rolls of 120/13 film, 40 sheets of 4x5).i like it, better than d23 i would think. cant scan currently since i dont have a scanner but i will soon enough so look out on this board lmao
>>4393160Well you can use rodinal, but it depletes very quickly. Idk the dilution or anything about it. If you just let it rip you can probably tell because your paper should take about 1 or 2 min to develop fully. Just dump more rodinal in your tray if it's too slow lol.
>>4393160if ilford stuff isnt cheap then i would skip on it. i thought you were in an area that it was okay to get easily.adding on to my last post, if you can get raw chemicals i'd highly recommend getting books such as "the darkroom cookbook" and "photo lab index". the cookbook has formulas and how to manipulate them, while the index just has formulas from ilford, kodak, afga, etc. both can be found as pdfs online but i'd prefer to get it physically as i like to write in mine. i have a bunch of solutions in the margins of my cookbook. attached is my copy of the cookbook on the d23 page lol
on an intrepid 4x5[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpi
>>43930884x5 is addictive, this was fuji160ns[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution2400 dpiVertical Resolution2400 dpi
made some contact prints this night and they suck lolthe orange/red light from the mini led panel is okayish for safelight but it does fog the paper a bit, I believehaving multiple light sources instead of a single point also seems to make the image dulltest strips didn't help in the slightestD76 1+1 was maybe actually too quick, the images were either this dull looking gray or went straight to shadowtownIt was a fun experiment, but next year I'll do it all properly in a lab with Dektol etc.I used Fomaspeed Variant 312, but might as well buy some Ilford paper or somethinganyway, tips for someone who hasn't wetprinted in about 9 years?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera ModelRedmi Note 8 ProEquipment MakeXiaomiImage-Specific Properties:Image Width3015Image Height2136Image Created2024:12:19 10:46:09Image OrientationTop, Left-HandF-Numberf/1.9Exposure Time3333/100000 secFocal Length5.43 mmFlashNo FlashISO Speed Rating703Image Height2136Image Width4624Lens Aperturef/1.9
>>4393163what are the advantages of using D23 over D72?for now I'll use the Dektol formula as is just so I don't have random amounts of metol and sodium sulfite lying around for no reason, but later I can either just buy D23 or buy this D72 compounds kit and mix it as D23>same times and speed/graininess as d76, but without d76's tendency to block highlights>D76is D23 a paper developer or a film developer?
>>4392971It's surprising that you even have images, E-4 and C-22 are long dead and forgotten. Also, IR sensitive films, and especially slide film does not age well. Maybe give it even more light and process it the same way you did previously? I doubt anyone here has useful tips for something so niche. Have you asked your local lab for advice?Picrel is 20 year expired fuji sensia 400, i wonder if the red spots here and the blue spotting on your image are caused by the same thing (background radiation and age?)>>4393017this is just 110 film with extra steps lmao>>4393057B+W feels like cheating sometimes. Especially considering how much simpler it is to edit afterwards[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop 21.2 (Macintosh)Image-Specific Properties:Image Width1110Image Height1652Number of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8Pixel CompositionRGBImage OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2023:12:27 11:53:21Color Space InformationsRGBImage Width1110Image Height1652Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>4393256>D76 1+1 was maybe actually too quick, the images were either this dull looking gray or went straight to shadowtownIMO if you are relying on pulling the paper out early you have already lost. To get good contrast you need to develop it fully, so you want to expose it so the highlights stay white even if you leave it in the dev way too long. If your safelight is not safe that will be a problem.Buy a real safelight. It should be dim not just red. You're relying on reciprocity failure to some degree.
>>4393355Catlabs sells a really great LED safelight that is super duper bright and the very narrow wavelength of the lights doesn't really touch the paper. Pricey, but really excellent.
This say a lot about society
>>4393383The corner of a building? never seen before
>>4393385look ma, I am Vivian Maier!
>>4393242Hellya dope shot[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
>>4393281d23 and d76 are film developers. you cannot buy d23 anymore, only mix them yourself.d23 only has two ingredients vs d76 has i think 7? better for mixing yourself. cheaper to mix both formulas rather than keep on getting d76 in packs.
why are m39 mount lenses so expensive?
>>4393434Leica dads
>>4393361temptingHowever,[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
>>4393456Just email them and say you're trans, no biggie. Shitty systems deserve to be abused.
>>4393355>IMO if you are relying on pulling the paper out early you have already losttrue lol>To get good contrast you need to develop it fully, so you want to expose it so the highlights stay white even if you leave it in the dev way too longyes, it was actually acting way too quickly and not properly>Buy a real safelight. It should be dim not just redcalm down, I'm not that stupidI was using it at its capacity 1% capacity and pointed towards the ceilingbut then again, the whole thing was just for fun>>4393419 ah got itbut why is it your preferred developer?just the highlights thing?>you cannot buy d23 anymore, only mix them yourself.>d23 only has two ingredients vs d76 has i think 7?D72 is 'elon-hydroquinone developer', a mix of elon (3,1g), sodium sulphite (90g), Hydroquinone (12g), sodium carbonate (180g), potassium bromide (1,9g) and water (completing 1L)D76 is 'elon-hydoquinone-borax tank developer', consisting of elon (2g), sodium sulphite (200g in crystals, or anhydrous 100g), hydroquinone (5g), borax (2g) and water (completing 1L)so D23 apparently has 5 ingredients (plus water), whereas D76 has 4 ingredients (plus water)would D23 work fine with just metol (elon) and sodium sulphite?also the quantities I found in Kodak Chemicals and Formulae differ from those you posted >>4393163I'm not doubting you, I just want to better understand this whole thing
>>4393507>>4393419ah sorry, I'm a dumb fuck and checked the formulas for D72 and D76 instead of D23 which is what you mentionedin the same book there's a formula for D-23 which is 7.5g of elon, 200g of sodium sulphite and 1L of water
>visiting family for christmas>camera shop local to them has its annual sale while i'm theremust...resist...urge...to fill my carryon with cheap glass
Shot black and white for the first time with Ilford Delta 3200. Definitely an interesting experience.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakePlustekCamera ModelOpticFilm 8200iCamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.4 (Macintosh)Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2024:12:20 19:00:52Color Space InformationsRGB
>>4393545Can't decide whether I like this version of the shot better.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakePlustekCamera ModelOpticFilm 8200iCamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.4 (Macintosh)Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2024:12:20 19:00:52Color Space InformationsRGB
>>4393546[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakePlustekCamera ModelOpticFilm 8200iCamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.4 (Macintosh)Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2024:12:20 19:00:55Color Space InformationsRGB
>>4393549[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakePlustekCamera ModelOpticFilm 8200iCamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.4 (Macintosh)Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2024:12:20 19:00:53Color Space InformationsRGB
>>4393545we're living parallel lives brother, I shot my first b&w roll of 3200 tmax in hollywood at night, you're shooting your first b&w roll of 3200 delta in rialto at night. I know there's some other socal /p/hotogaphers, we should do some kind of photowalk or meetup or something
How much do you boost your flash when shooting slide film?
>>4393549Kewl
i feel like i get worse as a photographer by the week. i get a roll back from the shop and think 'wow these are all bad. how did i fail on so many shots that felt like they would land in the moment?'[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareGIMP 2.10.38Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2024:12:20 14:23:11Color Space InformationsRGB
>>4393555nta but beers & cameras LA and East LA Film Shop have pretty frequent photo walks
excuse the shitty scan with newton ringsbut Kodak Gold in medium format is jsut amazing[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATIONCamera ModelNIKON D610Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 10.0 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/4.1Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaColor Filter Array Pattern844Focal Length (35mm Equiv)60 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2024:12:21 00:27:04Exposure Time1/20 secF-Numberf/9.5Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating100Lens Aperturef/9.5Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length60.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlNoneContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessHardSubject Distance RangeUnknown
>>4393603This one looks cool, anon
>>4393618haha beaver go chomp chomp
also shot some trains passing through a station while I was waiting for onecame out pretty cool>>4393622yes beavers are pretty cool manI've seen a lot of trees chewed by them, got a shot of one, will scan it tomorrow[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATIONCamera ModelNIKON D610Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 10.0 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/4.1Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaColor Filter Array Pattern844Focal Length (35mm Equiv)60 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2024:12:21 00:59:08Exposure Time1/45 secF-Numberf/9.5Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating100Lens Aperturef/9.5Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length60.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlNoneContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessHardSubject Distance RangeUnknown
>>4393618honestly my favorite color 120, which is great 'cause it's also cheapexcited to try phoenix in 120 because, like gold, it's kinda grainy and jenk in 35mm but has great color.
>>4393603that means you're learning
Fairly new to film photohraphy. I am going to a family dinner on christmas at my sisters house. What film rolls are best for indoor events like this? At this point I only have one roll of Ektar 100, but I am guessing that's not suited well foe this, so what roll should I buy and bring? Preferably something accessible and not some obscure roll you can only get online.Thanks
>>4393510no worries, its 100g of sodium sulfite and 7.5g of elon/metol in 1L of water for d-23i prefer this film developer as i can make it my own and its relatively cheap to buy the raw chemicals. the two bath developer i posted also makes way for using different stocks and iso of films very easily, if i ever need to test a film i havent tried before i can just stick it in there and itll come out okay (if the box speeds are the actual speed).
>>4393646Ektar and a flash, preferrably ttl but thyristor is fine too, optimally one that can angle upwards.
>>4393646fuji 400 aka fujimaxsold at walmart in 3 packs
>>4393629this would look so sick on a darkroom print
>>4393646don't use Ektar it'll fuck up the skin tones (unless they're dark skin tones) and you have a flashshoot b&w, something with a box speed of 400
>>4393618man I hate gold on 135 but that looks nicemaybe I just am not into gold + frontier tho
>>4393646if you have a flash ektar is fine, if you do not have a flash but it'll be well lit i'd suggest some flavor of 800T
>>4393555Damn Anon, that is coincidental. I would love to go on some photo walks with other Anons here, but I should note I'm not in Rialto but in Amsterdam
>>4393663I wish I had easy access to a darkroommaybe in the futureanother train, not as moody as the first one[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATIONCamera ModelNIKON D610Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 10.0 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/4.1Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaColor Filter Array Pattern844Focal Length (35mm Equiv)60 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2024:12:21 17:31:01Exposure Time1/45 secF-Numberf/9.5Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating100Lens Aperturef/9.5Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length60.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlNoneContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessHardSubject Distance RangeUnknown
more beaver stuffI need to get a decent film holder asap[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATIONCamera ModelNIKON D610Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 10.0 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/4.8Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaColor Filter Array Pattern844Focal Length (35mm Equiv)60 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2024:12:21 19:02:32Exposure Time1/15 secF-Numberf/9.5Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating100Lens Aperturef/9.5Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length60.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlNoneContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessHardSubject Distance RangeUnknown
>>4393802kentmere film my belovedwas this handheld or was this on a tripod? i may steal this composition from you haha
an short
>>4393837an bit longer
>>4393808looks comfy I like the vignettingwhat camera? I'm looking for a 6x6 with a decent viewfinder and a good lens. I have an Ikoflex and a Mamiya six but the ikoflex has a soft, decentered lens and the Mamiya has a tiny vf/rf that makes it impossible to frame or focus. Thinking maybe Mamiya TLR or a Bronica.
>>4393839Mamiya C is a good choice, if you want interchangeable lenses without breaking the bank then it's pretty much the only game in town now that every MF SLR has inflated to the god damn moon. I used to have the Bronica SQ and I found most of the lenses soft and underwhelming, your mileage may vary but I'm not going to buy another one. TLR can be a pain to get used to but the later C models have features to minimize the annoyance that comes with it, and not having a mirror mechanism is at least one less potential point of failure.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeEPSONCamera ModelPerfection V800Camera SoftwareGIMP 2.10.6Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution550 dpiVertical Resolution550 dpiImage Created2023:02:08 21:04:05Image Width14207Image Height14273
>>4393802there was no other way than to shoot it on a tripod mate, around 2 seconds on f8, with film pushed to 1600>>4393808Minolta Autocord with Rokkor 75mm f/3.5, the lens is really excellent, it's better than the lenses in Rolleicordsthe camera has a focus lever instead of a knob, it's more comfortable to use. Earliest versions like mine, doesn't have fresnel lens, so I had to mod it[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATIONCamera ModelNIKON D610Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 10.0 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/4.1Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaColor Filter Array Pattern844Focal Length (35mm Equiv)60 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2024:12:21 22:27:26Exposure Time1/45 secF-Numberf/9.5Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating100Lens Aperturef/9.5Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length60.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlNoneContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessHardSubject Distance RangeUnknown
Can someone tell me why my film photos don't look like this? The colors, the sharpness, the depth of field. Everything about these photos looks so good and I don't understand why my SLR is unable to achieve this.
>>4393894Let's see one of your pics. It could be a number of things.
>>4393894Are you ordering lab scans? Lab scans suck dickThe grain is not even grain, its oversharpened digital noise
>>4393897>LeicaThats why obviously :A)
>>4393904Leica deez nuts on yo face
>>4393918walked right into that one didnt i
>>4393918>>4393904LEICA? You barely know her!