File: img246 (1).jpg (1.16 MB, 1692x2516)

1.16 MB JPG

>>4389099
This has been my goal for a while, but I'm actually going to start focusing on it more because of the holidays coming up. Value added products for my farmers market stall, or in other words framed prints of chickens and that kinda stuff.

I've never tried selling my work, so it is kind of nerve wracking, but I know it's going to feel so good if and when I get sales, or even someone showing interest in my work!

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	1693
Image Height	2753
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Light Source	Unknown

>>4389099
>what are your plans regarding photography for the next year?
the warm embrace of death, or finally starting to do dark room prints

>>4389101
I think it will be refreshing to talk about photography with normies and boomers as well. Lol.

File: Image 24 (2).jpg (1.51 MB, 1766x2692)

1.51 MB JPG

>>4389103
Forgot chick pic.

>>4389102
Ilford pop up darkroom tents are very affordable if you need it and they can fit a small enlarger and trays for 8x10 prints!!

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Model	Perfection V800
Equipment Make	EPSON
Camera Software	Adobe Lightroom 9.5.0 (Android)
Image-Specific Properties:
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Image Width	1850
Image Height	2718
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2024:10:07 13:44:12
Color Space Information	sRGB
Flash	No Flash
Light Source	Unknown

File: Image 23 (6).jpg (3.08 MB, 4395x2540)

3.08 MB JPG

>>4389104
More chick pics.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Model	Perfection V800
Equipment Make	EPSON
Camera Software	Adobe Lightroom 9.2.2 (Android)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	4529
Image Height	2608
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2024:04:25 09:32:37
Color Space Information	sRGB
Light Source	Unknown

File: img256.jpg (1.25 MB, 2654x1683)

1.25 MB JPG

>>4389105
And more.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Lightroom 9.5.0 (Android)
Image-Specific Properties:
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Image Width	2760
Image Height	1693
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2024:09:05 16:30:54
Color Space Information	sRGB
Light Source	Unknown

>>4389099
I made this trichrome as a test / proof of concept to see if it would be possible to make a trichrome using red, green and blue lights instead of filters
red shot got a bit misaligned because I bumped into the tripod, and I don't have the patience to do microcorrections in perspective
but I'm glad to see it works

File: Untitled (3) (3) (3) (7).jpg (2.57 MB, 4359x3023)

2.57 MB JPG

>>4389106
The stall next to me was selling lots of Xmas wreaths for like 70 dollars each today, so I wouldn't feel bad asking 150-200 bucks for a framed and matted 8x10 print that will last multiple life times.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	EPSON
Camera Model	Perfection V800
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Image Height	3174
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Image Created	2019:01:04 11:14:13
Vertical Resolution	3200 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format
Pixel Composition	RGB
Horizontal Resolution	3200 dpi
Image Width	4662
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	4662
Image Height	3174
Light Source	Unknown

File: 20241129_0005_02.jpg (867 KB, 3659x3455)

867 KB JPG

very smol birb in medium format.

I had been testing Lucky film in both 35mm and 120, its awwwright for what it cost.

I got some light leaks because I load it wrong lol, my only criticism is that they are using the same backing paper than GP3 and that shit is bad, unless you like the numbers in your photos aesthetic.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	OM Digital Solutions
Camera Model	OM-5
Camera Software	darktable 4.8.1
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2024:11:29 13:56:00
Exposure Time	1/160 sec
F-Number	f/0.0
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	64
Exposure Bias	-0.3 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	23.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	3659
Image Height	3455
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	None
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

>>4389107
i kinda like the end result desu, it still looks mostly right but the effect of the red being slightly off gives it a nice look. I guess it is literally a chromatic aberration

File: 20241129_0010.jpg (1.21 MB, 3800x4081)

1.21 MB JPG

>>4389109
I really wonder if its some film or some weird aerial stuff, at least the 35mm its not foma or GP3. The 120 ISO 100, not so sure it curls less than GP3 and the water was running red when I developed it.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	OM Digital Solutions
Camera Model	OM-5
Camera Software	darktable 4.8.1
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2024:12:01 00:09:51
Exposure Time	1/60 sec
F-Number	f/0.0
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	64
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	23.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	3800
Image Height	4081
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	None
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

File: Image 37 (2).jpg (1.95 MB, 2784x1813)

1.95 MB JPG

>>4389111
Aerial film is usually extra sensitive to red, and very fine grained.

>>4389110
Are you going to post result?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Model	Perfection V800
Equipment Make	EPSON
Camera Software	Adobe Lightroom 9.2.2 (Android)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	4640
Image Height	3022
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2024:03:28 11:52:39
Color Space Information	sRGB
Light Source	Unknown

>>4389112
i was referring to the OP image

File: trichrome_and_strip_medres.jpg (4.93 MB, 1980x2357)

4.93 MB JPG

>>4389110
thanks, man
>>4389112
>>4389113
>Are you going to post result?
what do you mean?
maybe I'm not following, that was the end result already
I made this variation as well, though
that one was a test but I don't have anything else in mind for a trichrome in the near future, because working with colored lightsources instead of actual filters limits me to small subjects in controlled environments
but I'd love to make some trichromes with proper filters and stuff

>>4389114
Oh. Wasn't clear from your post. I thought you forgot to post pic and were replying to OP. Very cool!

The color noise/grain is kind of off-putting in your example, but I think it could be nice in certain situations. Regardless it is interesting to see what happens when you overlay different colored grain like that.

File: [13] Digitalização 1_medres.jpg (4.7 MB, 4534x2974)

4.7 MB JPG

>>4389115
>Wasn't clear from your post
ah sorry
>The color noise/grain is kind of off-putting in your example, but I think it could be nice in certain situations
yeah I'm not fond of it either, but I believe it's unavoidable when doing trichromes

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-6300
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Camera Raw 16.5 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2024:12:01 03:07:51
Exposure Time	1/100 sec
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	100
Brightness	2.2 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Other
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

>>4389116
I heard some nerd on here talking about how an rgbw sensor would be an improvement over just rgb. Is this something you could do to improve the trichrome image or am I retarded?

File: [3] Digitalização 1_medres.jpg (4.65 MB, 4437x2986)

4.65 MB JPG

>>4389117
I don't even know what you're talking about lol
the trichrome stuff is just for messing around (to me), maybe one day I'll buy actual filters and all that but I'm not too worried about getting it perfect

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-6300
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Camera Raw 16.5 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2024:12:01 02:47:39
Exposure Time	1/50 sec
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	100
Brightness	0.9 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Other
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

>>4389118
I don't even really know what I'm talking about either lol. The W stands for white so I guess it would be a fourth picture that has white light/no filter.

File: trichrome proof of concept.jpg (491 KB, 2000x1328)

491 KB JPG

>>4389118
If you just want to try it out get some cheap lighting gel sheets from amazon or wherever. costs like 5$.

This one was using gels on expired fp4 onkitchen table just trying to see if it worked.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	2000
Image Height	1328

File: ir trichrome.jpg (759 KB, 2000x1400)

759 KB JPG

>>4389134
I thought it was kinda cool so I also gave making IR trichromes a try.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	2000
Image Height	1400

File: 56765122606066.jpg (453 KB, 1335x1229)

453 KB JPG

I will be trying to fix lens with balsam separation picrel. It's and old Minolta lens.
There's high chance it was glued with canada balsam. I am going to boil it and clean it with acetone and then again glue it with fresh balsam. If boiling won't help, bath in acetone should do the job. Lens is fucked anyways so it's will be hard to fuck it even more.
Wish me luck.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Google
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand

Anyone has any recs for a stable and cheap copy stand that is arca swiss compatible? I want to get into scanning my film myself and that part has me stumped. For a light I plan on getting a cs-lite. I'm in the EU and most stands are way overpriced or out of stock.

File: [14] Digitalização 1_medres.jpg (4.28 MB, 4400x2920)

4.28 MB JPG

>>4389134
I've considered buying gels but for some reason I end up forgetting about them and never buying
trichromes are not at the top of my list of things to experiment with anyways but it's really cool
I wanted to buy infrared gels as well to put in front of my flash and do stealth night photography

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-6300
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Camera Raw 16.5 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2024:12:01 10:24:51
Exposure Time	1/125 sec
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	100
Brightness	2.4 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Other
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

File: uv.jpg (257 KB, 2000x1333)

257 KB JPG

>alternative processes edition
Yall ever do cyanotype enlargements? I got my bigass UV LED just need to build the rest of the enlarger. Not really sure what kind of lens to use, I guess something old and uncoated? Magnifying glass? I found UV rated lenses for scientific use but they're hundreds of dollars. Most of the stuff online is about printing onto transparency paper and then contact printing which seems kinda gay.

trying to find motivation to go and shoot some pics but ive got about 4 hours of sunlight a day, and ita getting less
how do other northfags do it

>>4389165
You want a process lens or an actual enlarger lens...

It's going to be fun to use a grain focuser and direct strong UV into your eye ball.

Printing transparencies is gay compared to shooting large film, but you can still get excellent results from it, and sometimes the ideal curves/contrast for a specific alternative process can be much more easily obtained digitally...

>>4389165
>Yall ever do cyanotype
yes
>printing onto transparency paper and then contact printing
it works well

File: trasures.jpg (3.93 MB, 5683x3794)

3.93 MB JPG

>>4389148
mission failed so far
this balsam doesn't fucking melt in 100C, I've heard some boil in oil but it will be very messy so for now I've thrown the lens into acetone and hope it will dissolve the balsam after night

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D610
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 10.0 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/4.8
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern	844
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	60 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2024:12:01 20:17:34
Exposure Time	1/100 sec
F-Number	f/9.0
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/9.0
Exposure Bias	1/3 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	60.00 mm
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	None
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Hard
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

>>4389192
>You want a process lens or an actual enlarger lens...
maybe but I dunno, it has to have a pretty wide aperture because cyanotype sensitivity is so low. And there's a limit to how much power the light can have before melting the film. I was thinking some old 50/1.8 without coatings so it transmits maximum UV light.
>It's going to be fun to use a grain focuser and direct strong UV into your eye ball.
Yeah I had the idea if I make it a diffusion style enlarger I could put a yellow light in there for focusing and then switch to UV once it was focused. Of course the focal points will be a little different but I'm not going for max sharpness.
>>4389194
>it works well
I don't doubt it but at that point why not just turn it blue in photoshop and do a normal inkjet print? The cool part to me is that if this works I can do huge darkroom prints without spending a fortune on paper.

>>4389210
You can get very fast projector lenses for a relatively low price.

>>4389211
ah, now we're talking. I see f/1.2 projector lenses are not uncommon, seems promising

>>4389210
the fun part is being outside using the sun and not being in the darkroom
touch grass

>>4389210
>I don't doubt it but at that point why not just turn it blue in photoshop and do a normal inkjet print?
why not just use a snoy and add dirt, grim and dog hair in photoshop, why shoot anything else at all?

>>4389077
oh yeah i use a dufflebag as well sometimes

>>4389186
start running
if youre a large format fag i wish you well

>>4389165
>>4389220
>Yall ever do cyanotype enlargements?
Yeah it works well. Basically I took off the head of an enlarger and replaced it with the LED/cooler/collimator unit, using a soup can with a hole in the bottom to keep it at the proper distance and block stray light. This needed no permanent modifications to the enlarger.
Exposure time is 20-40 min for 10x15cm prints depending on the negative, proportionally more for larger prints.

>I got my bigass UV LED
It seems to be a 50W one? Why not 100W? Printing speed is proportional to the power. Also you should get more than one, they are quick to die if the cooling fails.

>Not really sure what kind of lens to use
Regular enlarging lenses work well. UV absorption is not much of an issue at 395nm (unless the lens is visibly yellow), the main concern should be sharpness wide open.
I tried slide projector lenses too but they are much softer.
The f1.2 lenses you are seeing are for 8mm or 16mm film I think

>>4389239
>>4389210
oh and for focusing I use reading glasses and a sheet of paper coated with text marker

>>4389239
>Why not 100W?
cuz it cost more and I was afraid of cooking the LED and/or film. Are you using 100w? what size is the film? I have an old enlarger that's missing some pieces but the area where the bulb goes is pretty small and I don't think I could fit sufficient cooling in there. I was planning to make some kinda box out of wood and styrofoam.

>>4389244
Yes 100W (I run them at ~85W, at 100W they fry after a while) I bought the LEDs for 10€/piece on aliexpress. For cooling there are dedicated kits with an active heat sink with pre-drilled screw-holes, screws, the collimator lens and the holder (still needs thermal paste).
I use 35mm, never noticed any damage to a negative (after all the original enlarger runs at 75W and with passive cooling)

>I have an old enlarger that's missing some pieces but the area where the bulb goes is pretty small and I don't think I could fit sufficient cooling in there.
Yeah my setup only works with an enlarger where you can take the head off.

>I was planning to make some kinda box out of wood and styrofoam.
I can't help you there but there are some threads on photrio and the carbon printing group

>>4389254
buy a fire extinguisher in case shit goes south

File: [23] Digitalização 1_medres.jpg (3.71 MB, 4366x3082)

3.71 MB JPG

>>4389234
duffel bag it is, then

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-6300
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Camera Raw 16.5 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2024:12:02 01:40:20
Exposure Time	1/160 sec
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	100
Brightness	2.6 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Other
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

File: hospital_santa_catarina_c(...).jpg (4.7 MB, 1750x3689)

4.7 MB JPG

three different days

I remember when the /fgt/ was the one last thread on /p/ where the photos were actually decent relative to the absolute dog shit on the rest of the board. Now it's also just banal nothing with zero technical skill to any of the shots. Really sad this place finally died despite all the gear obsessiveness and know how being passed between people over the years.

>>4389306
>Nophoto whines and does absolutely nothing to improve things
Put your money where your mouth is motherfucker

>>4389203
Try using some orange degreaser on it

>>4389306
I'm sorry :(

god damn getting the color right on a negative scan is hard
it always look slightly wrong

File: IMGP4078.jpg (2.19 MB, 3406x3510)

2.19 MB JPG

>>4389334

>>4389335
How did you scan this? If your backlight is bad it'll make things real funky.

>>4389334
shoot black and white
colour film is retarded anyways

File: question marks.jpg (3.76 MB, 4413x2998)

3.76 MB JPG

pretty shitty test shot but I like how the light trails form question marks everywhere

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-6300
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Camera Raw 16.5 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2024:12:02 11:35:30
Exposure Time	1/125 sec
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	100
Brightness	2.3 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Other
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

>>4389355
i got the cs-lite for dslr scanning. do i need to do something with the white balance in my camera?

File: 20241201_0008.jpg (636 KB, 3519x2231)

636 KB JPG

>>4389306
I don't know man, I am constantly posting kino

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	OM Digital Solutions
Camera Model	OM-5
Camera Software	darktable 4.8.1
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2024:12:02 09:31:26
Exposure Time	1/15 sec
F-Number	f/0.0
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	64
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	23.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	3519
Image Height	2231
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	None
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

>>4389360
so when I DSLR scan I try to get the white balance as close as I can get it in-camera because then it gives me more leeway in post.

also if you got an underexposed file, either from overexposing the dslr scan or underexposing the film, you can't really save that, and it often manifests as weird blue highlights kinda like in your photo so try bracketing when you scan and pick the best one, chances are your settings need tweaking.

>>4389307
It's kind of interesting how collectively most people lost their motivation or interest in many hobbies over the last few years, not just photography.

>>4389375
Really now? Because all the people I know have actually gotten more engaged in their hobbies or gotten new ones since covid became an endemic.

I've gotten people into photography, homebrewing, some of my friends have started bodybuilding, my mother got her commercial truck license and started doing that as a side hustle.

I think you're a little doomer my friend, prolly shouldn't be projecting like that, it wont do you any good.

>>4389365
im probably overexposing the scan then. should the white balance be at the temperature of the light source or does it depend on the negative?

>>4389382
white balance should be on the mask of the film, just remember you don't have to get it perfect, thats what the post adjustments are for.

>>4389375
Misery loves company. Haha.

File: Screenshot_20241202_10392(...).jpg (552 KB, 1080x1626)

552 KB JPG

For the trichrome bros just saw this on ebay. Pretty crazy.

The bermphol tri color 5x7 camera.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Android UP1A.231005.007.S928U1UES3AXI1
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	1080
Image Height	1626

>>4389382
If I remember to photograph a grey card/colour checker I use that. Otherwise, I set my camera so that the light source (without film) is almost clipping as a highlight but doesn't have any colour cast.

Then capture the slide/negative leaving some space at each end of the histogram (adjust shutter speed to taste for this and to account for intentional over/under exposures).

Invert, if necessary, and set black/white point (as appropriate) from the unexposed edge or between frames.

This will get you close enough that you should then be able to make any further colour adjustments through levels/curves.

>>4389382
The white balance set on the camera does not matter one bit as long as you are shooting RAW which you obviously should be. If you want to reduce the digital noise increase from the orange mask you have to do it with a lens filter or colored light.
Your editor should have a way to indicate RAW blown highlights, if that does not trigger it is not overexposed. You should be ETTRing the best you can.

File: 6693 12022024 6-002~2.jpg (1.34 MB, 2416x1794)

1.34 MB JPG

>the only color film I like is ektachrome

I hope Kodak doesn't discontinue it again.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Camera Model	EZ Controller
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 14.0.1 (Windows)
Photographer	Brooktree Film Lab
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	2416
Image Height	1794
Image Created	2024:12:02 18:09:49
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Unique Image ID	10153094038

>>4389443
impressive how much those colors and bloom looks like a 90s digishit

>>4389099
Can we take a small poll if /fgt/? I don't shoot much and I'm curious how much of it is due to life getting in the way

>Age
>Employment status
>Relationshit status
>Kid status
>Rough number of pics taken a month

I'm 35 married with kids and work around 70 hours a week. I am lucky to be able to shoot 30 pics a month.

>>4389446
31
wageslave
forever alone
I hate breeders like you wouldn't believe it
96 photos a month

>>4389446
33
NEET (independently wealthy, have worked before and probably will again however)
long term gf
>having a kid who will grow up to fight in the water wars
depends, but usually 1-2 rolls a week

File: 010007130011_11.jpg (3.66 MB, 2016x2047)

3.66 MB JPG

Took this at infinity focus on a Super Isolette. Reckon my rangefinder is slightly out of wack, or does it just look like camera shake?

File: 010007130004_4.jpg (4.35 MB, 2016x2047)

4.35 MB JPG

And another one, less bad but still doesn't seems a bit blurry.

>>4389450
Looks like both. Im amazed that EVERYTHING is a little out of focus though. Is it focusing past infinity?

>>4389450
>>4389452
What shutter speed? It's unlikely to be camera shake if it's a decently high speed (I've seen some say as long as ss>fl it won't be very noticeable, but I try to aim for 2xss>fl to make sure). But likely you're focusing past infinity as >>4389453 says.

hey all
i got some anti halation dye in my fixer. should i keep using it or is it done for?

>>4389446
>>Age
29
>>Employment status
teacher and PhD student
>>Relationshit status
single
>>Kid status
never
>>Rough number of pics taken a month
it varies a lot
these last three months were unusually prolific for me, and on average I've shot around 90 photos per month
usually I probably shoot like 50 photos per month, I guess

>>4389453
>>4389454

Cheers yeah, I think it must be focusing past infinity. The first one was 1/60 I think (which is why it seems a bit blurrier), but the second one was definitely at least 1/125.

I bought it off that Certo6 Jurgen guy who is supposed to specialise in servicing these - bit of a pain that it came with a misaligned rangefinder.

File: [4] Digitalização 2_medres.jpg (3.9 MB, 4443x3029)

3.9 MB JPG

>>4389450
>>4389460
it's not camera shake
you can see all the tiny lightsources in the sidewalk are perfectly round and there's no light trail
as >>4389453 said it seems to be focusing past infinity
>>4389458
I don't know if there's any problem with that but I would at least filter it through a coffee paper filter or something so that it won't smudge the film
filter it and then test it before returning it to the bottle with the remaining fixer

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-6300
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Camera Raw 16.5 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2024:12:01 04:02:39
Exposure Time	1/80 sec
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	100
Brightness	1.7 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Other
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

File: 315.jpg (2.32 MB, 2500x1387)

2.32 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: stack.jpg (2.79 MB, 1657x2500)

2.79 MB JPG

>>4389475

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: R1-03423-0033.jpg (734 KB, 1800x1200)

734 KB JPG

>>4389446
>31
>30hrs per week
>foreveralone
>.
>average month this year is probably around 500 pics per month

>>4389452
wonderful light and color, in any case

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	GIMP 2.10.38
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2024:11:04 00:49:34
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: IMG-20241006-WA0002.jpg (45 KB, 640x426)

45 KB JPG

>>4389446
>Age
40
>Employment status
Mid level manager
>Relationshit status
Arch wizard
>Kid status
Fuck DNA you ain't the boss of me
>Rough number of pics taken a month
Maybe a dozen. I'm burned out and infinitely disappointed with my shit so I'm focusing more on my whiskey collection these days.

File: Untitled-(2)-(7).jpg (2.83 MB, 2838x1000)

2.83 MB JPG

Car show that was once called "Wintersun"

Film was very expired, dont remember exactly what it was though, maybe 500t

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: Untitled-(2).jpg (2.7 MB, 2845x1000)

2.7 MB JPG

>>4389484

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: Untitled-(2)-(3)-(2).jpg (2.3 MB, 2805x1000)

2.3 MB JPG

>>4389485

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: Untitled-(2)-(5)-(2).jpg (2.46 MB, 2806x1000)

2.46 MB JPG

>>4389486

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB

>>4389484
xpan or what? color cast looks pretty cool
>>4389486
crazy that people used to hang such things off such an expensive little piece of glass

File: Untitled-(2)-(2).jpg (2.91 MB, 2824x1000)

2.91 MB JPG

>>4389490
thanks, its 35mm film with 120 adapters inside a mamiya rb67

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: 000025.jpg (511 KB, 1818x1228)

511 KB JPG

>>4389099
>/fgt/ daily reminder
yes yes, i know, but
i recently got a roll of film from a flea market (stored in unkown conditions, presumably the opposite of what it should be stored in(currently is in my fridge in a desperate attempt to slow down the degredation of whatever is left)), a roll of Tudorcolor II, which i havent found much about online
it is ASA 100
issue is it has expired since september 1984, as it is colour film im not sure wtf to do with the stop per decade rule(or if i should fuck with it at all), im not sure if shooting at 16/24 ASA will be a good idea, seems a bit too much
im not expecting to get good results at all from the get go, but im wondering if there is a way to try and ensure i get at least some results, be it shooting at 1/60 or f/16 or in sunny conditions or whatever
i cant develop the film myself so i have no control over that to "pull" it

i will shoot it anyway, if i get any useable results i will come back and post them (thus the tripcode)

>>4389446
>18, shooting since 14~
>uni IT student
>might get one this month (Depends)
>none
>usually i shoot a roll over a month/two month time period because little money for development

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	FUJI PHOTO FILM CO., LTD.
Camera Model	SP-3000
Camera Software	FUJI PHOTO FILM CO., LTD. FE FDi Service Software / FRONTIER355/375-3.0-0E-511
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2024:09:19 12:54:00
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1818
Image Height	1228

>>4389443
so much magenta cast, terrible

>>4389446
>Age
39
>Employment status
unemployed for a about a year, enjoying having so much free time
>Relationshit status
single, not looking for gf
>Kid status
lmao
>Rough number of pics taken a month
1-2 rolls each month but probably a couple hundreds on digital

>>4389483
same desu. shit is fucked

File: _DSC4641.jpg (3.25 MB, 3827x5733)

3.25 MB JPG

>>4389446
>26
>mid level engineer
>single (it's over)
>never
>4-6 rolls every month
I am a slav, so film was still popular in my childhood since digital cameras were expensive as fuck
literally first photos I've ever taken were of my mother and brother on Kodak Gold on a cheap disposable camera, when I was like 5 years old

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D610
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 10.0 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/4.8
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern	844
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	60 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2024:12:03 16:33:45
Exposure Time	1/500 sec
F-Number	f/9.0
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/9.0
Exposure Bias	1/3 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	60.00 mm
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	None
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Hard
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

File: W45TMX1SG01.jpg (1.97 MB, 3500x2766)

1.97 MB JPG

Some bunch of shit

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	EPSON
Camera Model	Perfection V800
Camera Software	GIMP 2.10.6
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	295 dpi
Vertical Resolution	295 dpi
Image Created	2024:11:24 15:47:51
Image Width	29842
Image Height	23529

File: W45TMX1SG04.jpg (1.43 MB, 3500x2704)

1.43 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	EPSON
Camera Model	Perfection V800
Camera Software	GIMP 2.10.6
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	295 dpi
Vertical Resolution	295 dpi
Image Created	2024:11:24 16:31:52
Image Width	29880
Image Height	23529

File: W45TMX1SG06cor.jpg (2.89 MB, 3500x2745)

2.89 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	EPSON
Camera Model	Perfection V800
Camera Software	GIMP 2.10.6
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	295 dpi
Vertical Resolution	295 dpi
Image Created	2024:12:02 20:43:01
Image Width	29867
Image Height	23529

File: W45TMX1SG09.jpg (1.85 MB, 2643x3500)

1.85 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	EPSON
Camera Model	Perfection V800
Camera Software	GIMP 2.10.6
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	295 dpi
Vertical Resolution	295 dpi
Image Created	2024:12:03 19:33:11
Image Width	23562
Image Height	29794

File: W45TMX1SG08.jpg (2.53 MB, 2511x3500)

2.53 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	EPSON
Camera Model	Perfection V800
Camera Software	GIMP 2.10.6
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	296 dpi
Vertical Resolution	296 dpi
Image Created	2024:12:02 21:21:02
Image Width	23466
Image Height	29777

File: W45RPX25SG03.jpg (3.62 MB, 2765x3500)

3.62 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	EPSON
Camera Model	Perfection V800
Camera Software	GIMP 2.10.6
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	295 dpi
Vertical Resolution	295 dpi
Image Created	2024:12:03 20:24:39
Image Width	23561
Image Height	29832

File: 2021-01-10-5b77fa29-ac48-(...).jpg (78 KB, 924x571)

78 KB JPG

>spent hundreds for a Ricoh GR1 back in May
>Shutter doesn't fire anymore

Sigh...

>>4389561
>buys meme camera
>old electronics do what old electronics do
LMAO who would have thought?

>>4389583
You're right. I knew it would happen. I bought it specifically for a trip. I should just be glad it lasted the whole trip, even though it was only 2 and a half months

>>4389600
it served its purpose
in a rather expensive way, but it did
now go buy a fully mechanical camera as you should have done in the first place and quit jumping in the hype train, faggot

>>4389620
I took a f100 but I used the Ricoh way more just because it was so much easier to carry around I'm actually considering getting a repair

File: [2] Digitalização 2_medres.jpg (4.86 MB, 4449x2986)

4.86 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-6300
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Camera Raw 16.5 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2024:12:03 22:46:46
Exposure Time	1/60 sec
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	100
Brightness	1.4 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Other
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

Thinking of Bessa II or Super Ikonta or something of that sort, but maybe I'm being dumb. I don't see myself getting into MF with a huge one that's impractical to carry with me wherever.

File: img709---02.jpg (990 KB, 1267x1000)

990 KB JPG

Ektar100 on intrepid 4x5

File: DSC06618editSMBDR.jpg (1.08 MB, 1600x1600)

1.08 MB JPG

>>4389446
>>Age
35
>>Employment status
Intern Arch
>>Relationshit status
Partnered
>>Kid status
None
>>Rough number of pics taken a month
Couple rolls of 35mm

>>4389722
Banger

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand

>>4389706
get a TLR, they are very small and light, doesn't have bellows which often need a repair
you can get on inexpensively, and they have much better faster lens like f/3.5, look into Yashica, Mamiya or even Rolleicords
it's harder to get one in good condition but same goes for folding cameras

File: Unti1tled.jpg (3.8 MB, 2000x1600)

3.8 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi

I'm a newfag to /p/.
I'm looking for a film camera for my gf as a Christmas present. She used to do photography before having to sell her gear due to medical expenses (this happened before we met). I want to get her both a film and digital camera to get her started again. She's a good woman and has stuck by me even in hard times. Sadly I know essentially nothing about cameras. I would like to get into it myself too

What's a good camera to start with? It seems like 35mm is the most common and cost-effective choice. Which models? Is there a readme anywhere? Thanks guys

>>4389735
The Nikon F and Canon EF mounts both have SLRs (film) and DLSRs, so you could pick one and share the lenses between film and digital. Nikon F is compatible further back (including fully manual film cameras), the Canon ones are better compatible forward (great compatibility with their mirrorless system using an adapter).

Depends whether you want mechanical or electronic film camera and whether you want mirrorless or DLSR. And on your budget.

>>4389735
always choose pentax, you can use the lenses both on digital and film cameras.

And you wouldn't want to give your gf something that sounds like a NIGGOR? right? What if she starts liking black meat?!?

>>4389735
You can get really pro results from Minolta AF mount imo and the camera bodies outside the Maxxum 9 and most of the lenses are very cheap. A Minolta Maxxum 5 and a 35-105 f3.5-4.5 and 50 1.4 or 1.7 is going to be a $150 proposition all up and give very good results.

>>4389743
>muh shitty electronics

>>4389739
>>4389740
>>4389743
Thanks guys, I'll look into those. Keep the suggestions coming too

Out of curiosity, I checked ebay and some cameras are sold as "body only". What does that mean? There's no lense or film? Or the actual mechanics inside are missing?

>>4389767
No lens. Film she will buy. Make sure you get a body that is tested btw. A lot of untested stuff is just a paper weight.

>>4389767
correct, no lens or film. for film cameras you'll always be buying new film as you shoot it a roll at a time and then develop that roll. you should be able to find a lot of cameras with the lens they came with (the so-called kit lens) for basically the same price as just the body. I'd also check craigslist or other local marketplaces as you can often find people selling their old stuff for dirt cheap as they upgrade/downsize or just think their 30 year old camera must be worthless even if its still perfectly functional.

File: DX8RPX1JUL2401.jpg (1.45 MB, 1300x2000)

1.45 MB JPG

hors

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Plustek
Camera Model	OpticFilm 8200i
Camera Software	GIMP 2.10.6
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	44 dpi
Vertical Resolution	44 dpi
Image Created	2024:11:27 21:24:55
Image Width	6768
Image Height	10248

File: DX8RPX1JUL2403.jpg (1.41 MB, 2000x1318)

1.41 MB JPG

Really wish it was summer again already

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Plustek
Camera Model	OpticFilm 8200i
Camera Software	GIMP 2.10.6
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	44 dpi
Vertical Resolution	44 dpi
Image Created	2024:11:27 21:28:14
Image Width	10248
Image Height	6768

File: DX8RPX1JUL2405.jpg (1.32 MB, 1313x2000)

1.32 MB JPG

Sunburst makes everything cool.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Plustek
Camera Model	OpticFilm 8200i
Camera Software	GIMP 2.10.6
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	44 dpi
Vertical Resolution	44 dpi
Image Created	2024:11:27 21:31:25
Image Width	6792
Image Height	10224

File: DX8RPX1JUL2406.jpg (1.61 MB, 1338x2000)

1.61 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Plustek
Camera Model	OpticFilm 8200i
Camera Software	GIMP 2.10.6
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	44 dpi
Vertical Resolution	44 dpi
Image Created	2024:11:27 21:34:12
Image Width	6792
Image Height	10104

File: DX8RPX1JUL2415.jpg (1.24 MB, 2000x1304)

1.24 MB JPG

Take over for me, nophotos.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Plustek
Camera Model	OpticFilm 8200i
Camera Software	GIMP 2.10.6
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	44 dpi
Vertical Resolution	44 dpi
Image Created	2024:12:03 22:04:57
Image Width	10218
Image Height	6770

>>4389818
Indeed

>>4389288
Some brazilian cities do look like japanese cities.

>>4389872
Especially the favelas

>>4389872
lmao, do macacos really believe this

File: Mamiya RB67 - Kodak Ektar(...).jpg (1.27 MB, 2000x1597)

1.27 MB JPG

>>4389446
>>Age
28
>>Employment status
Aftersales technician in an applicance store
>>Relationshit status
In a relationship
>>Kid status
Hopefully before i'm 30
>>Rough number of pics taken a month
In the summer with the lads it can be 2-3 rolls, in winter maybe 2 roll for the season

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand

>>4389735
Canonet G-III QL17 for a film camera. Digital maybe try a Fuji x-t1

Also be aware when purchasing anything over the internet. Look in the description of the item if it says whether it has fog/haze/fungus/separation.

If it has those, avoid it

>>4389735
Better to get her a good reliable film camera than short lived junk and a digishit

Find the newest, least used nikon fm3a you possibly can. I know these are expensive but that’s because they don’t need overhauls yet. They were produced into the 2000s (so was the very desirable nikon S3)

>>4389888
yes buy your gf an inevitable light meter repair
i hated my canonet for the crappy meter even with the wires resoldered, clunky controls, hard to read rangefinder patch and slow shutter. goodish lens but eh. avoid.

>>4389735
>She used to do photography
find out what camera she wants or at least had and try to get the same or similar, as a start. that'll save you the headache of doing research and/or accidentally buying a pos or something she hates.

your question is like my gf had a car. I want to get her two cars a manual and automatic but don't know cars, what do. my brother....

>>4389735
Get her a 1v with a 24-70 f2.8 and be done with it. That's my girls favorite camera aside from my contax T3.

File: DX8RPX1JUL2425.jpg (1.78 MB, 2000x1328)

1.78 MB JPG

Anybody know where I could get a Mamiya C33 serviced in Europe without having to pay enough to just buy a working one? Got a jammed cocking/film transfer mechanism. No options in my own country for sure.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Plustek
Camera Model	OpticFilm 8200i
Camera Software	GIMP 2.10.6
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	44 dpi
Vertical Resolution	44 dpi
Image Created	2024:12:04 22:03:04
Image Width	10150
Image Height	6813

File: tree1.jpg (1.43 MB, 1464x2232)

1.43 MB JPG

very impressed with this vivtar 28mm f2.5 I picked up recently

File: tree2.jpg (1.2 MB, 2232x1464)

1.2 MB JPG

>>4389950

File: tree3.jpg (1.23 MB, 2232x1464)

1.23 MB JPG

>>4389951
shot on fuji 400 (which I guess is just kodak stock but inexplicably a dollar cheaper) with my srt200

File: closeup bird.jpg (1.11 MB, 2232x1464)

1.11 MB JPG

>>4389952
less impressed with the 500mm f/8 mirror lens, though some of it I think comes down to user issue and using it with a teleconverter

>>4389953
Is that the one you were talking about earlier in this thread? Did you try it woth a rock solid tripod + shutter release cable?

File: Screenshot_20241204_20570(...).jpg (340 KB, 1080x1484)

340 KB JPG

Anyone have a clue why this unmarked lens is getting bid up to like 500+ dollars? They say it's roughly 700mm, and a single element lens.

Why does it have that cap thing?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Android UP1A.231005.007.S928U1UES3AXI1
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	1080
Image Height	1484

>>4389955
last thread yeah. and no I haven't done any tripod shooting with it yet which will probably improve the iq significantly (as would not adding the teleconverter), since I didn't bring a tripod with me on vacation where I picked it up. now that i'm back in town i'll give it another shot properly and try not to let my impatience get the better of me

>>4389948
my girl is a husky btw

hey all
do you guys bulk load film?

ilford will raise prices very very soon so i was thinking about getting some kentmere or hp5 100ft rolls and a bulk loader.

is it better to bulk load or will i be fine?

>>4389962
Nah fuck ilford, if they raise prices just buy more foma, that'll show them.

>>4389982
Reminder that 80% of dollar supply was printed in the last 5 years. It's not evil ilford being greedy, it's the govt that's assfucking you.

>>4389983
More like its the govt thats assfucking ilford because im not gonna be their little sugardaddy. If they cant stay afloat in this economy then tough shit, foma it is.

>>4389962
>do you guys bulk load film?
yes, it's cheaper but more work
>ilford will raise prices very very soon
when and how do you know?
>>4389982
foma sucks ass

>>4389949
Guy in Warsaw Poland services Hassle-blads and Mammamiyas very well, he's an older gentleman was a serviceman for polish press office back in the good old days, not sure if english is an option with him but anyway here's his page: http://www.foto-mechanika.pl/co_naprawiam.php
If that doesn't work for you try it yourself, check some YT videos how to disassemble it (worst part is often removing leatherette without fucking it up, soak the glue in isopropyl alcohol until it softens and use wood/plastic spatula).
Often times you will just need to clean the gears and their axles with iso or lighter fluid and lubricate it (sparsely!) with watch oil like Moebius 8000.

>>4389956
seems like old projector lens, maybe seller with his friends are bumping the price to hype it, I can't imagine this being better than duck taping magnifying lens from DIY store to toilet paper roll

>>4389962
> bulkloading
yes' I'm actually buying it bulkloaded to old canisters by some lab guy here on local ebay equivalent, still cheaper and I don't have to buy loader and fuck around with tape and stuff.
>>4389982
with foma I have love-hate relationship really, I've had few series of Fomapan 100 in 120 that had white spots from allegedly contaminated anti halation layer, Foma advised to wash it in 90% alcohol for 45 minutes, I'm not doing that fuck them. Kentmere Pan 100 is only slightly more expansive and also has thicker more flat base which makes film lay flatter in camera as well is better for scanning (it's actually better than in HP5+ of FP4).
Foma Pan 100 in 4x5 and their papers are very good never had any problems with them and pricing is sound. Also I've used a lot of their chemistry like R09, fomafix, fomacitro no problems ever and for a fraction of a price from the competition.

File: DSC07234editSMBDR.jpg (1.18 MB, 1600x1600)

1.18 MB JPG

>>4389962
All I've shot for the last few years is bulkloaded bw. If prices of your favourite films are going to go up it totally makes sense to grab a couple 100' rolls and throw em in the fridge. You can buy a nice Watson or Alden74 bulkloaded off eBay for $20...so it'll pay itself off in the first 100' of film.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand

File: DX8KCP23132 (2).jpg (2.47 MB, 2000x1336)

2.47 MB JPG

>>4389999
Thanks, I guess my only option is to sell it for parts. Should get at least something for the lens. I want out of the LF shit but decent MF setups have inflated like crazy in the mean time. Maybe being a 35mmlet is in the end my only choice.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Plustek
Camera Model	OpticFilm 8200i
Camera Software	GIMP 2.10.6
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	44 dpi
Vertical Resolution	44 dpi
Image Created	2023:09:12 21:56:21
Image Width	10175
Image Height	6814

>>4390007
Electronic bronica systems are still cheap as fuck and really great. ETR/SQ/GS

Got my FED 2 on the mail today, yippee :3

>>4390009
I hope you know how to service a Leica shutter because that won't be far off.

File: DX8RPX1JUL2427.jpg (1.29 MB, 2000x1323)

1.29 MB JPG

Today's evening shits.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Plustek
Camera Model	OpticFilm 8200i
Camera Software	GIMP 2.10.6
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	44 dpi
Vertical Resolution	44 dpi
Image Created	2024:12:05 18:27:49
Image Width	10174
Image Height	6765

File: DX8RPX1JUL2432.jpg (1.67 MB, 2000x1311)

1.67 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Plustek
Camera Model	OpticFilm 8200i
Camera Software	GIMP 2.10.6
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	44 dpi
Vertical Resolution	44 dpi
Image Created	2024:12:05 18:36:09
Image Width	10222
Image Height	6769

File: DX8RPX1JUL2433.jpg (1.57 MB, 2000x1301)

1.57 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Plustek
Camera Model	OpticFilm 8200i
Camera Software	GIMP 2.10.6
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	44 dpi
Vertical Resolution	44 dpi
Image Created	2024:12:05 18:39:03
Image Width	10230
Image Height	6769

File: DX8RPX1JUL2434.jpg (1.69 MB, 1306x2000)

1.69 MB JPG

Fuck winter.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Plustek
Camera Model	OpticFilm 8200i
Camera Software	GIMP 2.10.6
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	44 dpi
Vertical Resolution	44 dpi
Image Created	2024:12:05 18:42:09
Image Width	6769
Image Height	10230

>>4389446

27, Work full time and going to college (again), in a relationship, no kids, just trying to get back into photography after 10 years doing other stuff...

I got a Hasselblad 500cm with some lenses for like 450 ten years ago. Amazing deal. I also have a voightlander bessa r with a canon 50mm lens.

Before I get too deep into setting up my darkroom. I wanna bring my film to a shop for developing. I have about 10 rolls of 35mm and medium format film... I want to shoot a roll through each as a test. A test to see if a light leak hasn't developed while moving or neglected. Now that I'm an adult I look at this a lot differently - what type of questions should I ask the developer and how do I know how find a good business to do this ?

>>4387643
>contact company, they say they had a bad batch and replace it for free
>ups reports replacement damaged in shipment, returned to sender

>>4390053
It depends m8, did you shoot BW or color film? If you were shooting at box speed just give them the film and that is.

File: AOKG2JKL2410.jpg (2.95 MB, 1334x2000)

2.95 MB JPG

Gold time boys.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Plustek
Camera Model	OpticFilm 8200i
Camera Software	GIMP 2.10.6
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	44 dpi
Vertical Resolution	44 dpi
Image Created	2024:12:05 19:10:43
Image Width	6811
Image Height	10005

File: AOKG2JKL2417.jpg (3.37 MB, 1338x2000)

3.37 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Plustek
Camera Model	OpticFilm 8200i
Camera Software	GIMP 2.10.6
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	44 dpi
Vertical Resolution	44 dpi
Image Created	2024:12:05 19:25:48
Image Width	6763
Image Height	10125

File: AOKG2JKL2419.jpg (3.33 MB, 1345x2000)

3.33 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Plustek
Camera Model	OpticFilm 8200i
Camera Software	GIMP 2.10.6
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	44 dpi
Vertical Resolution	44 dpi
Image Created	2024:12:05 19:37:48
Image Width	6811
Image Height	10149

File: AOKG2JKL2420.jpg (3.63 MB, 2000x1333)

3.63 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Plustek
Camera Model	OpticFilm 8200i
Camera Software	GIMP 2.10.6
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	44 dpi
Vertical Resolution	44 dpi
Image Created	2024:12:05 19:41:21
Image Width	10149
Image Height	6787

File: AOKG2JKL2423.jpg (2.79 MB, 1313x2000)

2.79 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Plustek
Camera Model	OpticFilm 8200i
Camera Software	GIMP 2.10.6
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	44 dpi
Vertical Resolution	44 dpi
Image Created	2024:12:05 19:48:18
Image Width	6812
Image Height	10221

File: AOKG2JKL2424.jpg (2.67 MB, 1319x2000)

2.67 MB JPG

Fuck winter, in color.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Plustek
Camera Model	OpticFilm 8200i
Camera Software	GIMP 2.10.6
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	44 dpi
Vertical Resolution	44 dpi
Image Created	2024:12:05 19:51:34
Image Width	6768
Image Height	10224

>>4390116
these are cozy

>>4390113
cool but the trees look unnatural and kenrockwelled
>>4390114
technically well done but doesn't tell me anything, I can't relate to it, it's a screensaver
>>4390116
generic but feels nice
>>4390115
very cool, the uneven light is pretty nice
>>4390110
you cannot comprehend how much I detest this one
>basicbitchcore
my grandma would send me this shit with a horrible glittery GOOD MORNING written all over it

>>4389982
foma suck ass

>>4389998
my professor said so, idk where he got that info tho

4x5 /fgt/s

i recently bought a tachihara 4x5 field camera for cheap but one issue - the front standard thumb screw thing to make the front rise and fall is missing, the seller is giving it to me with his jank setup via two small nuts.

is there anyway i can get a replacement part for it? its shipping to me right now so i can't really get any measurements yet

File: DX8KP162312.jpg (2.61 MB, 2000x1315)

2.61 MB JPG

>>4390223
>>basicbitchcore
I know, it's what I do, been doing for 11 years. Thanks for the feedback my guy.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Plustek
Camera Model	OpticFilm 8200i
Camera Software	GIMP 2.10.6
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	44 dpi
Vertical Resolution	44 dpi
Image Created	2023:08:05 23:44:24
Image Width	10200
Image Height	6768