[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/p/ - Photography

Name
Options
Subject
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]

[Catalog] [Archive]

THE "WE'LL ACTUALLY POST PHOTOS" EDITION

>thread question
who's your biggest influence in your photography? do you have any photos that resemble their body of work?

Previous thread >>4399633

/fgt/ daily reminder (courtesy by anon): one stop per decade is (generally) bullshit
>negative film ages better than positive
>black and white better than color
>slow films better than fast
>storage conditions (dry/cool) matter more than years
>Negative film is shot 1 or 2 stops overexposed and then PULLED in development so that you build more density in the exposure and develop less such that the fog is limited
>slide/positive film is shot at box speed or overexposed and pulled.
>if you home develop you can also use benzotriazole as a restrainer for the the first developer in E6 process

Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
264 replies and 115 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4406174
Sir, this is film general.
>>
>>4406276
My mistake. Sorry about that.
>>
>>4404507
Isn't that Isabella Rossellini?
>>
>>4404928
That's a shame. I was going to splurge on the V850 a couple years ago, but ended up getting the V600 instead.
>>
>>4405150
Sorry for the late reply. That is great that you pursued a career in aviation! Yes, these kids these days definitely did get screwed over.

File: protesters.jpg (3.68 MB, 3534x2370)
3.68 MB
3.68 MB JPG
66 replies and 51 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4404490
holy based
>>
>>4404421
>>4404424
>>4404425
>>4404426
exceptional photos
>>
File: 1721792872874082.jpg (60 KB, 852x817)
60 KB
60 KB JPG
>>4404424
This dude
>>4404425

>>4404426

>>4404435

>>4404433

Bro, these are excellent and i commend you. You got right in there, no shooting from the side lines. Keep it up.
>>
>>4404435
nice picture
>>
>>4404306
Same reason they police any public event, the more agitated monkeys you have in one place at the same time, the higher is the chance of violence occurring for some completely retarded reason.

Like how you some people are late bloomers, you may be one too in photography. Post here questions that go a step below the stupid questions thread and into amateur territory.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution300
Vertical Resolution300
30 replies and 4 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4406255
>>4406230
>>4406198
>A/AV
with the way digital cameras work, Aperture priority is the most commonly used mode. You set the aperture which is super important for 2 reasons in terms of creative control
first, you can set the depth of field. you can decide if you want a lot of things in focus or only the subject in focus and everything else out of focus. this makes a big difference in the final image. (its not technically in focus, only one plain is in focus but it looks like its in focus)
the other thing is most lenses have a "sweet spot" where they are sharpest. Usually its somewhere in the f/4-f/8 region. anything more closed than that has diffraction and anything more open will be softer with light fall off at the corners. you might take a portrait outside at f/1.8 to hide the background, but if you were say in a studio in front of a backdrop you might shoot at f/5.6 to get better sharpness.
Aperture priority is also very popular because most modern cameras have a setting called "auto iso" and often only have one dial for exposure so its annoying to set both exposures at once unless you have time. with auto ISO you pick a base iso, an iso step, a max iso and a minimum shutter speed. generally, but not always, people only care about minimum shutter speed and don't care as long as the shutter is above minimum and modern full frame cameras have great ISO performance.
you set the aperture, if the shutter speed the camera selects is at or above your minimum shutter speed the camera will take a photo at your base iso you set. if your camera cannot shoot at that minimum shutter speed it will raise iso until it gets an exposure that works for your shutter and aperture. if it hits your max iso you set your camera will then shoot at the aperture you picked at your max iso you picked, but at a shutter speed below your minimum shutter speed.
>>
>>4406256
>>4406255
>>4406230
>>4406198
Finally there is M or manual mode. people generally shoot in this mode because they are new or they have some lighting issues that make it difficult for the camera's light meter to work right or they need a specific aperture AND a specific shutter speed.
generally manual mode isn't the best experience for a new photographer because its slower to set, you usually only have 1 dial to set all 3 settings on cheaper cameras and all you are doing is chasing the light meter anyway. one of the wildlife/sports photographer boomers on youtube says he generally shoots either A mode with auto iso or manual mode with auto ISO depending on what he needs with his shutter speed and how the light is. high iso is bad because it degrades the image and makes the colors look like shit, but more expensive full frame cameras can get away with higher iso better and its better to have a high iso image than a blurry image due to missed focus or a slow shutter speed or no image at all. in the past sports and wildlife would have been shot in shutter mode.
I would suggest either using manual mode or aperture priority. p mode is ok if you really need it. manual does not make you more of or a better photographer than A mode if all you are doing is chasing the meter
>>
>>4406245
Watch a Youtube video on the exposure triangle.
>>
>>4406247
>>4406247
what about canon eos rp? i’m trying to decide between nikon z5 or eos rp but i already have a bunch of EF glass so i thought it’d be better to stay canon and it’s a hundred bucks cheaper
>>
>>4406284
the EOS RP is a mirrorless canon 6d with a smaller battery, it's a very noisy sensor

you should probably continue to ask in /gear/ or /sqt/ instead of giving a zach thread attention. zach himself is literally mentally disabled and lives under the stairs in his elderly parents house and can not answer any questions in any capacity.

most conscious moments
5 replies and 2 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4405016
really pretentious tbpqh
>>
>>4405316
>he doesn't know "golden hour" is when the divinity in light shines through
>>
>>4405016
It starts with "when" but never follows up with anything. When you're lonely and the lighting looks like this.... What? What about that? Why is the post not "I'm lonely and this is the lighting right now"?
>>
>>4406050
Zoomers experience high enough levels of anxiety, depression, and lgbt disorder to just get what comes after the "when" (mix of dread, emptiness, cocklust, and trump ptsd)
>>
File: N805VL_FL390.jpg (1.41 MB, 4000x3000)
1.41 MB
1.41 MB JPG
>>4405016

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera ModelIN2019
Equipment MakeOnePlus
Sensing MethodUnknown
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)0 mm
Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.7
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width4000
Image Height3000
Image Created2025:01:03 01:37:33
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
ISO Speed Rating125
Exposure ProgramNot Defined
F-Numberf/1.8
Focal Length4.74 mm
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Light SourceD65
Metering ModeCenter Weighted Average
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Exposure Bias0 EV
Image Height3000
White BalanceAuto
Brightness0 EV
Exposure ModeAuto
Image Width4000
Lens Aperturef/1.7
Color Space InformationsRGB
Shutter Speed1/100 sec

File: 8106812518_a72dd5293e_k.jpg (926 KB, 2048x1536)
926 KB
926 KB JPG
Can somebody tell me why it's super easy to tell when a photo was taken in 2008?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
1 reply omitted. Click here to view.
>>
File: new 3.jpg (1.98 MB, 2048x1536)
1.98 MB
1.98 MB JPG
Snapshit from 06

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeCanon
Camera ModelCanon PowerShot A75
Maximum Lens Aperturef/3.5
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Lens Size5.41 - 16.22 mm
Firmware VersionFirmware Version 1.00
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution180 dpi
Vertical Resolution180 dpi
Image Created2006:01:01 13:22:25
Exposure Time1/500 sec
F-Numberf/7.1
Lens Aperturef/7.1
Exposure Bias-1/3 EV
FlashNo Flash, Auto
Focal Length9.41 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width2048
Image Height1536
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Exposure ModeProgram
Focus TypeAuto
Metering ModeCenter-Weighted
ISO Speed Rating200
SharpnessNormal
SaturationNormal
ContrastNormal
Shooting ModeManual
Image SizeLarge
Focus ModeSingle
Drive ModeSingle
Flash ModeRed-Eye Reduction (Auto)
Compression SettingSuperfine
Macro ModeNormal
Subject Distance2.520 m
White BalanceUnknown
Exposure Compensation2
Sensor ISO Speed192
Image Number103-0329
>>
>>4405496
>Chromatic aberration
Digicams were made for dirt cheap, so lenses there aren't perfect. They wouldn't use aspheric glass, but also they didn't have plastics and molds to make aspheric lenses out of plastic. Or maybe they did but didn't use it for that purpose, who knows. Due to size and cost constraints, you can't just put in more normal spherical elements to correct the aberrations.
>Sharpness
Exact same story.
>Noise
Sensors they used back then were much more noisy.
>Image size
They didn't have 50 MP sensors you have in your phone right now. It was 2~14 MP.
>>
>>4405496
>>4406207
Another one is sensor bloom. Around captured bright sources of light there are soft halos that appear in the final image. Sort of like a black mist filter, but not quite the same. CCD sensors (which were used in most older point and shoots) have this inherent bloom effect because of spillover. CMOS sensors do not, since the pixels are independently processed.
>>
Technology has its stages.
>>
I think it is sorta cool that a lot of photos from that era have this particular look. Not something I want today obviously, but cool nonetheless. Noisy flash photos was a thing as well while the subsequent cell phone era had none of that. Photos weren't taken to be posted on social media either so the thought process in taking a photo was a completely different one. Often they have a innocent randomness to them and as an elderly millennial it feels strange having lived through all of it and being familiar with those scenes because it makes it seem so distant.
We still shit on digishitters, but truth is that the latest generation of them is rather remarkable and the technological progression hasn't gotten much appreciation, undeservedly so because it has been a very slow and gradual process.

File: bellows.png (434 KB, 674x355)
434 KB
434 KB PNG
It's your twice weekly gear thread! The most active discussions on /p/ right here!

I'm currently in the market for a new macro focusing rail, my current one is just a cheapo off amazon you need to loosen to adjust.
I see Sirui making decent items all around, and they make a focusing rail for less than $120 but I wouldn't mind some input from other anons.
67 replies and 10 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4406111
>shelf for a LENS CAP
Hey, I use mine as a shutter. It's an important piece of equipment.
>>
I guess this is the best place to ask this.
canon has the EF and EF-S as well as the RF and RF-S, snoy has an equivalent, pentax has pentax 67 to 645 adaptors and people in general put medium format film lenses on medium format digital and full frame digital cameras or full frame lenses on micro four thirds cameras
is there an optical disadvantage to putting a full frame lens on a crop sensor, or any lens with an image circle bigger than the sensor onto that camera? is there an optical advantage to an APS-C lens on an APS-C camera over the full frame lens?
there were people on canon's site's forum saying the only difference is that since crop sensors are smaller crop lenses can be smaller, lighter and cheaper.
I was very slightly contemplating putting a pentax 67 lens on a pentax 645 since there is an OEM adaptor, but I probably won't regardless because the only pentax 67 lens that is faster than f/2.8 is the 105mm f/2.4 and the bokeh on that lens makes me want to puke its so ugly

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop 21.1 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2020:03:17 13:32:19
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
Image Width792
Image Height858
>>
>>4406233
The big image circle can cause reflections in poorly designed cameras (uncommon) and adapters (somewhat common)
Larger format lenses may appear optically worse when used with the smaller pixel pitch of crop sensors, gaining entirely new aberrations FF users never saw before and never cared about (this is why snoy lenses are so big, to keep up with the a7rv)
>>
>>4406233
It's often advantageous because edges of the frame tend to be weakest and your new edge performance just becomes the lens performance. An argument could be made for how greater pixel density in the center and midfield affects performance, but that's not super relevant in practice.
If you had a lens with lots of swirly bokeh on the edges, you lose that with the cropping, but sometimes that might be beneficial to omit. At the end of the day, it's not gonna be much different than using the lens on a larger sensor and simply cropping in.
>>
>>4406249
It is relevant

Lenses that are ok on the edges on ff remain just ok on apsc and sometimes get even worse because the midframe sharpness falloff is magnified. It ranges from no benefit to major downgrade.
You do lose vignetting tho

File: sleeping pig.jpg (3.32 MB, 2995x2000)
3.32 MB
3.32 MB JPG
What's your favorite animal, /p/? Mine is the frog.

Here are some snapshits from a fair I went to. My dad gave me a Sony A6400 which was really fun but I think I did something wrong with the colors so I've just gone and turned those off.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeSONY
Camera ModelILCE-6400
Camera Softwaredarktable 4.6.1
Maximum Lens Aperturef/5.6
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)75 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Image Created2024:10:21 00:46:16
Exposure Time1/160 sec
F-Numberf/5.6
Exposure ProgramNormal Program
ISO Speed Rating6400
Brightness1.7 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length50.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width2995
Image Height2000
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
GPS StatusMeasurement Interoperability
Geodetic Survey DataWGS-84
GPS Differential CorrectionNo Correction
127 replies and 98 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
File: E1B515D7.jpg (4.41 MB, 5313x4250)
4.41 MB
4.41 MB JPG


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeSinar Hy6
Camera ModelEmotion 75
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 14.1.1 (Windows)
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)5000 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Image Created2025:02:10 21:41:08
Exposure Time1/60 sec
F-Numberf/6.4
ISO Speed Rating100
Lens Aperturef/6.4
Focal Length50.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
>>
File: E1B51DB0.jpg (3.98 MB, 4866x3643)
3.98 MB
3.98 MB JPG
Last one.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeSinar Hy6
Camera ModelEmotion 75
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 14.1.1 (Windows)
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)5000 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Image Created2025:02:10 21:43:15
Exposure Time1/50 sec
F-Numberf/8.0
ISO Speed Rating100
Lens Aperturef/8.0
Focal Length50.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
>>
File: DSC07976.jpg (1.08 MB, 1500x1000)
1.08 MB
1.08 MB JPG
snake

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
>>
File: _1548867.jpg (2.1 MB, 2400x1799)
2.1 MB
2.1 MB JPG
>>4405325
comfy

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakePanasonic
Camera ModelDC-GH5M2
Camera Softwaredarktable 4.8.1
Maximum Lens Aperturef/5.6
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)600 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Image Created2025:02:13 14:49:40
White Point Chromaticity0.3
Exposure Time1/250 sec
F-Numberf/7.1
Exposure ProgramAperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating320
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length300.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width2400
Image Height1799
RenderingCustom
Exposure ModeAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Gain ControlHigh Gain Up
ContrastNormal
SaturationHigh
SharpnessHard
Image QualityUnknown
White BalanceAuto
Focus ModeAuto
Spot ModeUnknown
Image StabilizerUnknown
Macro ModeNormal
Shooting ModeAperture Priority
AudioNo
Flash Bias0.00 EV
>>
>>4403312
This is great. I maybe would have shaved off some of the right part of the pic but nice job otherwise

File: DSC05557.jpg (3.36 MB, 4347x3105)
3.36 MB
3.36 MB JPG
Any tips for graffiti or so called "street art" photography? Give me your harshest criticism.
I've started taking photographs only recently and I'm mainly interested in demons, usually in urban areas. Basically anything occult or disgusting. Poverty, prostitution, drug addicts, all that sort of stuff.
Other subjects such as buildings, landscapes, animals, etc, I don't find too difficult to frame although I'm still in the process of learning this new hobby.
But those graffiti ones, which I find are my favourite since the subjects are mostly being drawn by schizos and vendalists, are more difficult. They always come out dirty or messy to some degree, or maybe that's just in their nature.
I'll post some that were taken on Tel Aviv. I'm about to embark or a journey throughout Europe, where I'm told this phenomena is 20x worse than in here, and I want to be ready since my time over there is very limited.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeSONY
Camera ModelILCE-7M4
PhotographerAdolf Hitler
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)24 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Exposure ProgramAperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating100
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash
White BalanceAuto
66 replies and 59 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4406000
I'm not dense, I've wrote academic papers on graffiti and variations of it, and been shooting for quite some time to know that yeah of course there's something unique to those photos blablabla (as with any photograph, actually; being unique is a characteristic of the medium, not a merit of these photos)
the thing is that it'll always be derivative and will serve as nothing more than a photographic record of a moment in time of that specific wall
the light will change, the mood, the weather yadda yadda but in the end it's a shot of the graffiti
it would actually be impossible to have it separated from those aspects, that's just obvious
I'm not arguing some dumb shit like "oh it's not art" or anything like that
it can be art for all I care, I don't give a shit
what I'm saying is that it's bad
your contribution to the photo is pretty much null (and preferably so, so as not to interfere with what really matters: someone else's work)
as I said before: I too regularly shoot graffiti
but on my phone, just to show other people later or see them myself, not to LARP as an artist
>woah i'm such a great photographer, look at the quality of my body of work
>>4404695
>>4404682
>>4404683

Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>
>>4405780
>>4406137
I have to agree with graffiti PhD Anon, I've wondered why photographers on the artsy side of the spectrum stick to their cameras if they want to make art.
Demon hunter Anon could make a collage, composite photographs or a short film if he wanted to pursue visual art. Crushing blacks and over saturating images hardly count as a take. Documentary work in itself is important and sometimes even aesthetically pleasing.
>>
>>4406137
>I've wrote academic papers on graffiti and variations of it
lmfao
>he's so dense he doesn't realize stating this only reveals how dense he is
>>
>>4404682

I kind of like some of these. They aren't going to win you any critical appraise but I enjoy the novelty of stuff like this.

There was an anon around here that would do street telephoto work from his car with subjects like hookers in the bad parts of cities.

You aren't going to get any constructive criticism from /p/ on this stuff. Unless it's building corners, leaves, or a lens test chart.

The best advice I can give you is try to incorporate more story into your photos. Maybe use the graffiti as a background to a different subject....like your cats for example. Graffiti Phd anon is being really obtuse but there's a truth to what he's saying.
>>
File: drinkwater.png (4.38 MB, 1573x1211)
4.38 MB
4.38 MB PNG
best tag in my town on the lowest risk abandoned box car from the 40's in the woods beside a homeless encampment

Post terrible photos that actively annoy you
37 replies and 6 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4406024
>>4406027
argies look like THIS???
>>
I never meant to annoy anyone I better get lost..
>>
>>4405565
what do you do for work zach
>>
>>4406215
I'm sorry I can't answer your question it does not relate to photography.
>>
>>4406216
that is a childish response

File: IMG_4028.jpg (599 KB, 1214x1214)
599 KB
599 KB JPG
/compact/ v3

Talk compact cameras, post pictures, etc

Is that a camera in your pants or are you just happy to see me edition

Previous thread >>4396396

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
Image Width1214
Image Height1214
Scene Capture TypeStandard
37 replies and 7 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4405880
maybe improved modern optics corner to corner? plus for digital high res use so modern optics can handle more details and corrections. not sure with the sensor flange distance compared to film, maybe it also has an effect.
>>
>>4405880
because they were mostly printed in 15x10s, too small to notice excessive optical effects unless you were enlarging
Nowadays even the potatoest of editing rigs can enlarge each individual pixel to 128px*128px squares extra sharply
>>
File: canon mounts.png (26 KB, 1082x362)
26 KB
26 KB PNG
>>4405888
Any body that's directly compatible with vintage glass will have the same flange distance as a film camera, otherwise the lenses wouldn't be compatible, forcing you to use adapters if your flange is shorter.
>>
>>4405880
There are plenty of modern FF lenses that are just as tiny, just look at M mount.
Most modern lenses are bigger for optical reasons, autofocus motors, IS, video-related features, etc.
>>
File: IMG_4278.jpg (72 KB, 1024x576)
72 KB
72 KB JPG
Is he using a Fuji X100something?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1024
Image Height576
Scene Capture TypeStandard

How the heck is this kind of image made? She appears to be swinging her head half way through the shot.
It's not just a slow shutter. Because her whole face would be blurred. I think it's probably a rolling shutter effect from a phone filter, but I want to emulate it with a DSLR.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAndroid CPH2447_15.0.0.401(EX01)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width1439
Image Height1406
Unique Image ID49f0b0b4-060d-4187-8ae4-66f7ff74986f
>>
It's called slit scan photography. May this knowledge guide you on your journey into the google search results.

File: 20241013_123847.jpg (3.66 MB, 1868x4000)
3.66 MB
3.66 MB JPG
I have an addiction to taking photos of bees
What are you addicted to photographing?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Makesamsung
Camera ModelSM-N985F
Camera SoftwareAdobe Lightroom 7.5 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.8
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)25 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Image Created2024:10:14 09:05:42
Exposure Time1/240 sec
F-Numberf/1.8
Exposure ProgramNormal Program
ISO Speed Rating50
Lens Aperturef/1.8
Brightness7.0 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModeCenter Weighted Average
FlashNo Flash
Focal Length7.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
57 replies and 43 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
File: b6RY4zC.jpg (149 KB, 1033x840)
149 KB
149 KB JPG
I've taken a photo of a bee before. Not gonna lie it looks weird but the Cherry blossom tree zoomed in looks like this.
>>
File: 000268830023.jpg (1.18 MB, 1545x1024)
1.18 MB
1.18 MB JPG
hello friends, here is a bee bee-deep in a flower

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeNORITSU KOKI
Camera ModelEZ Controller
Camera SoftwareEZ Controller 6.11.003 (140225)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1545
Image Height1024
>>
File: 000759290011.jpg (914 KB, 1565x1037)
914 KB
914 KB JPG
i don't have any of pigeons on power lines, but I have this of them checking some menus at a cafe

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeTHE DARKROOM - thedarkroom.com
Camera ModelTHE DARKROOM - thedarkroom.com
Camera SoftwareEZ Controller 6.60.031 (160615)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2025:01:22 23:13:47
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1565
Image Height1037
>>
File: 085_HIGH_01_XXX.jpg (4.57 MB, 4000x2471)
4.57 MB
4.57 MB JPG
speaking of birds, swans and a.... not swan

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeSILBERSALZ
Camera ModelAPOLLON 14K CINE SCANNER
Camera SoftwareCAPTURE ONE CULTURAL HERITAGE
PhotographerUNKNOWN FILM
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
Image Width4000
Image Height2471
>>
File: IMG_0813.jpg (2.64 MB, 3888x2592)
2.64 MB
2.64 MB JPG


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeCanon
Camera ModelCanon EOS 400D DIGITAL
Lens Size18.00 - 55.00 mm
Firmware VersionFirmware 1.0.4
Owner Nameunknown
Serial Number0730378797
Lens NameEF-S18-55mm f/3.5-5.6
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2007:01:23 11:00:32
Exposure Time1/500 sec
F-Numberf/5.6
Exposure ProgramNot Defined
ISO Speed Rating200
Lens Aperturef/5.6
Exposure Bias0 EV
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length55.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width3888
Image Height2592
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Focus TypeAuto
Metering ModeEvaluative
SharpnessUnknown
SaturationNormal
ContrastNormal
Shooting ModeMacro/Close-Up
Image SizeLarge
Focus ModeOne-Shot
Drive ModeSingle
Flash ModeRed-Eye Reduction (Auto)
Compression SettingFine
Macro ModeNormal
Subject Distance0.270 m
White BalanceAuto
Exposure Compensation3
Sensor ISO Speed188
Camera Actuations-1875771184
Color Matrix129

File: IMG_20250208_185007 (1).jpg (1.73 MB, 2398x3197)
1.73 MB
1.73 MB JPG
Best one I've ever used so far was Kodak Gold 200 due to the vintage look and warm colors and Ilford HP5 for contrasty street photography.
Worst was Fuji 100. While the vibrance is okay, it's way too blue and green.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeXiaomi
Camera ModelM2101K6G
Camera SoftwareAdobe Lightroom 10.1.0 (Android)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.9
Sensing MethodNot Defined
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)25 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2025:02:08 19:18:17
Exposure Time1/35 sec
F-Numberf/1.9
Exposure ProgramNormal Program
ISO Speed Rating145
Lens Aperturef/1.9
Brightness-0.3 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModeCenter Weighted Average
Light SourceD65
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length6.04 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
5 replies and 1 image omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4404966
>posts photo
>gets helpful advice and critique
>personally attacks poster in return and demands work for free
pottery
>>
File: 1728600724534922.jpg (20 KB, 332x1024)
20 KB
20 KB JPG
>>4404965
>>4404971
>Pottery
You meant poetry? The poor ESL can't even formulate a grammatically sound sentence besides parroting one-liners.
>>
>>4404984
How new are you? In fact you dont even have to tell us
>>
Let's see, best? I like ilford fp4+, that's what I always use. Velvia 50 for colour, but keep in mind I haven't used it since it was brought back, that was ages ago... I just love looking at the 4x5 slides though.
Worst: I can enjoy any film really, maybe BW400CN? I don't understand the point of it since I want to develop B&W at home not fiddle with exact temperatures and shit.
>>
SHANGHAI GP3 NUMBAH ONE

File: 5.jpg (145 KB, 1483x724)
145 KB
145 KB JPG
How important are these? What happens if you don't use it?
24 replies and 1 image omitted. Click here to view.
>>
File: 20250214_111322.jpg (41 KB, 324x667)
41 KB
41 KB JPG
>>4406094
I stare at the sun to hyper sensitize my films, then I do a fast exposure of my films and transcribe what particle movement and/or impression I see from the photos I take in my films. Fake cameras are completely unessesary to develop your film, but sometimes if you want to take a picture of something going really fast or dangerous such as a nuclear particle a shutter may be helpful.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Makesamsung
Camera ModelGalaxy A25 5G
Camera SoftwareS256VLUDS4BXI1
Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.7
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)27 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Compression SchemeJPEG Compression (Thumbnail)
Image Height3060
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Image Created2025:02:14 11:13:23
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Image Width4080
Lens Aperturef/1.8
Exposure Bias0 EV
Exposure ProgramNormal Program
Color Space InformationsRGB
Unique Image IDB50ELOIR2PM
Image Height3060
Brightness1.4 EV
White BalanceAuto
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeAuto
Exposure Time83/5000 sec
FlashNo Flash
F-Numberf/1.8
ISO Speed Rating125
Image Width4080
SaturationNormal
ContrastNormal
SharpnessNormal
Focal Length4.00 mm
Metering ModeCenter Weighted Average
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Light SourceUnknown
>>
>>4406146
>tfw it's lens inspection day and your photosis prevents you from pulling the hood back all the way
>>
>>4406162
>>4406168
Love a good schizo post.
>>
File: 1739567508104758s.jpg (1 KB, 85x124)
1 KB
1 KB JPG
>>4406171
<3
>>
>>4406171
Some men just want to watch the world learn.

File: NewStreetCamera.jpg (234 KB, 1202x956)
234 KB
234 KB JPG
It's a good day to be a M43 chad.

>Compact early SLR design with weatherproofing
>pen F dial for people who like taking pictures instead of gooning in lightroom for hours on end
> OM-3 Kit with 12-45mm F4 Pro £1999 or £1699 for just the body
>new weather sealed compact primes
>perfect camera and system for pretty much any kind of photography outside of extreme low light and niche studio work (which should be using medium or large format anyways)

If your not a self hating sensor size queen doesn't this seem like the perfect everyday carry? Nothing can replace film but at least for digital shooting this looks perfect for most use cases not covered by the OM-2 Mark ii.
183 replies and 24 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4406084
>olympus
>actually doing this right
lol, olympus does not have enough money for an aperture ring, they literally reused parts to make this

the jpeg settings dial doesn't even load any presets of note (ie: film sims), it looks like the crappy "creative" filters that went on every PNS
>>
>>4406120
>the jpeg settings dial doesn't even load any presets of note (ie: film sims), it looks like the
presets are just creative filters, stop intoxicating yourself.
>>
>>4406123
>well uhm film sims are just presets
they are better presets with more powerful controls.
olympus color science is bad, olympus sooc jpegs are bad and oversharpened/phone like, and their presets are even less worth using and so limited even snoy picture profiles can be better

a fuji xm5 is $800 ($1000 less) and takes better jpegs than this gimmick machine for computer nerds who know what a bs-acked sensor is
>>
>>4403718
>went full retro to delete the existing grip
they're completely missing the point. There's no demand for "retro" om-system camera when om-system as a brand has no heritage. Unless they can actually get the olympus brand there's no point. No one's going to drool over this.
>>
>>4406170
>implying the retro camera craze is rooted in actual heritage and not vibes


[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.