Posting kino by photographer, Diane Arbus.
these photos feel weirdly predatorylike oooooh you look lower class I will capture you I guess she was doing it to make money but the "look at all the circus freaks" vibe just feels exploitative and grossI guess the stated goal here is "capturing candid reality" but it feels more like mocking those who are different.
>>4513350It’s degenerate AND they wanted big bucks, and thus took the shortest path which isnt exactly deeply thoughtful shit. Its like photography had a marvel/dc film moment. >wait, the works of art make less money than the simplistic childish novelty? and all we have to do is heap some postmodern nonsense on later? WELL THEN *unzips leica*
>>4513352It's like you know nothing.
>>4513338>Butthurt copeStart arguing anytime lil bro>>4513352The feeling you mention is derogatory called "misery porn", the consumption of someone else's dog days so you can feel something.
>>4513631I'm not arguing with you, I'm making fun of you
every single time
>>4508900I remember seeing an ad for an absolutely rusted out old "rare" beetle sitting in a field where the seller who had inherited it claimed that their grandad or whoever had been offered a specific sum some 2 and half decade ago, with pictures of the car from back then etc, and they "did not want sell below that". Problem is that back then it may have been worth some money as it was somewhat complete, but sitting outside for decades even with price appreciation as these things have become more popular it was still way more than what it was worth in the condition it was in. Guess that sort of thing goes in the family. It is a shame with all these folks sitting on perfectly fixable stuff that they think they can do themselves, but in reality can't only for the thing to sit and rot until they die of old age.
>>4507713i like this fellas videos about camera e-waste but that half laugh he does in the middle of random sentences that aren't funny is kinda grating once you notice it
>>4507802It is a verifiable phenomenon across different hobbieshttps://www.guitarworld.com/news/digitech-bad-monkey-klon-centaur-jhs-pedals-prices
>>4507713Saw the same thing happen with a cheap espresso machine then one of the youtubers said it was hidden gem
>>4507713i just like how he says KEMra
I’m thinking of getting a shift lens but I understand a view camera can make the same movements, and tilt-shift lenses are also available for most ILCs. Have any of you used a shift lens, tilt-shift lens or a view camera? What did you use it for? What was it like using one? Frustrating? Simple? Did you need any other accessories to make the process work? How did you like the final results? Was it worth the expense and effort? Is digital perspective correction just as effective?Now that I’ve really begun to focus on perspective in my images it’s all too obvious how even a small tilt of the image plane away from parallel with the subject causes distortion. Do you care about keystoning in your pictures? >picrelThe shift scale on the Laowa 20mm f/4 Shift.
>>4510346why? just tilt the camera. tilt the tripod.use a shadowbox
>>4510346cool topic op
I'm basically looking at these two lenses (second pic incoming) and I can't narrow it down to just one because there are pros and cons to both, in my eyes:15mm>super wide, never going to be too close20mm>doesn't push the horizon a hundred miles away>more natural field of viewthat's pretty much the pros for both. im not a super deep thinker. all i can think is if I go with the 20mm I'll sometimes want the 15mm, but if I go with the 15mm, maybe sometimes I'll want the 20... jeez.
I'm also thinking of buying it in K-mount since that will let me use the lens on both film and digital cameras without adapters. I have used a 14mm lens before on APS-C and I found it really hard to frame anything like a landscape since everything looked so distant. Never got to use it in a dense urban environment though, or inside much.
I've had the Laowa 15mm Shift and the Nikon 24mm TS - and a couple of things come to mind. The Nikon was far sharper than the Laowa BUT the Laowa was way more fun to use because of the extreme wide angle. You cant Tilt the Laowa (Its shift only) so you will lose the miniaturisation/Focal depth aspect - but you would be using shift WAY more anyway. The Laowa can suffer with hard vignetting at the maximum shift. It depends on what you want to achieve. Serious work? Go for top brand. Want to be creative with it? The Laowa is fine (if expensive).
How does /p/ feel about zines?They seem fun. You print your stuff, distribute it however you want, and people look at it. They might toss it in the trash but at least you made an impression.You can make them for pretty cheap. I made some lo-fi DIY-style ones with my visual art at home using just an inkjet printer, and I've been dropping them in random places for people to find.Anyone ever make zines?
>>4503146that's cool. congrats on 10 years of marriage
Who would be into a seasonal /p/ zine?
>>4510348I would.
Made this with pics of a roll Printed some and ended up doing nothing with it
>>4514256cool as f*ck desu
How to fix cricketing in the audio on s5mkii?I use rode shotgun mic and record on sd (if that matters) and there is a weird high pitched cricketing/pulsating noise/buzz. While video is goated, the audio issue ruined (made audio annoying to work with) in 2 of my films :/
>>4514206Its not a cable problem and its both on rode and internal mic
>>4514211bigger. firmware up to date?
>>4514164This. If your camera is fucked hock it off to some dumb nigger. I do it all the time.
>>4514202Not poor? Can you afford a canon r5? -> Canon R5 or R5IIKinda broke? Can you admit most video specs are in the same region of retardation as using a 100mp camera for 4x6 prints? -> Nikon Z5II
>>4514211panasonic quality strikes againim sorry if it was /p/ that told you to buy the s5ii. we have a deranged panasonic shill living here aka menu system autist. he tells everyone lies about canon and sony’s build quality (projecting) supported with cherry picked user-destroyed cameras, lemons, and botched reviews from known bribed youtubers. however it is panasonic that has the ridiculous failure rate and unreliable weather sealing. sony ff products are really good, but they outnumber everything that isnt canon ff combined (sony ff and canon ff are roughly equal and trade #1 bragging rights yearly) so some failures are inevitable. whats important is the failure rate. one busted panasonic is statistically the same as a few dozen busted sony and canon cameras. and to be frank, since they aren’t worth a lot or used as heavily by professionals they tend to not be complained about as loudly as someone’s lemon r5ii. just never buy panasonic again. i know their arbitrary video features like dci and open gate seem attractive and retard youtubers make a big deal but you can always frame wider and crop. resolution is irrelevant for video unless you’re such a serious pro you’re pushing hours upon hours of footage to another department for more work and need the absolute framing consistency and extra res for vfx and keeping rigging on the outside of the final crop, and in that case you’re definitely not using a fucking panasonic except as a crash cam. bonus: sony, canon autofocus actually works. shit, even nikon and fuji have better autofocus than panasonic.
>Nocturnal photography (also referred to as night photography) refers to the practice of taking photographs outdoors between dusk and dawn, when natural light is minimal or nonexistent.>The low-light conditions night photographers work in require specialized techniques to achieve proper exposure, including long exposures—ranging from several seconds to days—higher ISO sensitivity, or artificial lighting.>The genre encompasses a wide range of subjects, including urban and rural landscapes, architecture, industrial sites, and astrophotography.Post your night photos!
I don't want to buy a new flagship every two years. I just want to have a nice pocket camera and keep my midrange for a while. My old olympus pocket camera lasted for almost a decade. Preferably nothing more expensive than $700
>>4491769Of course, a GR-series camera would be excellent for OP, but it won’t cost him $700 or less. Maybe a GR1? If that’s the 16MP one, I just found a listing for one… $899… let alone the ones you’ve mentioned.
>>4505788>$899 for a gen 1even the gen 2 and 3 are getting around for that much or less
>>4489617any
Isn't there those new(ish) digital cameras that looks like candy bars?
>>4489665these break too easy
Taken by me at an Old thrift store down town. The store is very old and is a Salvation Army, i thought it would be a good place for photography and it really way
>AAAHHHH IS THAT A ROOM WITH NO TIKTOK MACHINE INIT?>SAVE ME TUNG TUNG SAHUR
this mall in Japan gave me creepsno stores in the whoel thing only one floor at the top had a karaokeall other floors were like this
>>4514219
>>4514220
no liminal photos posted yet itt
>photography hero grows oldIt's not fair bros
>>4512933Page taken down since then?
>>4512953Probably I haven't been there in years but there were a few that did it
>>4512988I hear some people say Tumblr is better than posting on Instagram these days so maybe there's still a market to be had on there for art hoes to see our shit
>>4512047his photography is dogshit. I had to laugh out loud when I saw the lightroom presets he sells: just upping saturation, brightness and contrast. Lmao.
Hello its jared polin and today we genocide panastin... I mean hasselmmas
Chance Encounter editionI was going to snap a picture of a flower when this Saffron Finch came flying and stood on one of its branches>Previous Thread Image Limit Reached >>4500320
>>4514025Wonderful
First seagull I saw to not eat trash, encountered it on the Island Heyabeliada which is a short ferry ride from Istanbul.
Color doesn't matter. Today when you can adjust colors just by pressing a button there's nothing more fake than a color. You should only shot B&W. Black and White photography is real and pure. Shape, shadow and light - this is what makes your photography look special, not some bright oversaturation. If your picture looks good without colors then your picture is worthy
>>4502479>color doesn't matterNew mirrorlesscuck jew cope just dropped
>>4513814>yet they still fit into your pocketsunless you're a skinny jean wearing faggot, none of those other cameras will have an issue going into a pocket.
>>4502479is this the bnw bread?postan
>The Ansel Adams Publishing Rights Trust has raised concerns over what it describes as the unauthorised use of Ansel Adams’s name and work in an “AI-generated colour version” of his iconic photograph shot in 1942 Moonrise, Hernandez, New Mexico, which was recently exhibited and offered for sale at a major international photography fair.>In a statement, the Trust said the work “exploited Ansel’s name, reputation, and his most iconic image, while failing to identify any human artist responsible for its creation. The Trust did not authorise, endorse, consent to, or acquiesce in the ‘AI-generated colour version’ of ‘Moonrise, Hernandez, New Mexico’ exhibited and offered for sale by Danziger Gallery at The Photography Show presented by AIPAD in April. The Trust was not consulted or notified before the work appeared. Once alerted, we reached out to James Danziger in real time, notifying him of the Trust’s rights, and asking for the work to be removed. Correspondence shared with the Trust shows that, despite our formal notice, Mr. Danziger subsequently leveraged Ansel’s name, ‘Moonrise,’ and the AIPAD presentation while pursuing a proposed commercial AI colourisation venture involving other artists’ estates.”>James Danziger made a response on the Danziger website to Ansel Adams Trust's condemnation by not only mentioning that the image is technically in the public domain, but also wrote: "As for the print itself, while A.I. served as the starting point, the final image involved extensive human intervention, editing, proofing, and refinement over many months."
>>4513117your shitposting sucks
>>4513113Worst photo I've seen on this board yet, is this why Ken is a meme? t. /p/ newfag
>>4512754Nice to see a bit of color in it, the original is so dark and depressing
>>4512754Some absolute tech nerd was the first person to pour all art into an AI model. IT fucking sucks that tech dorks absolutely desecrate art and music to enrich themselves. I'd like to choke each one of them death in a row
>>4512754Not only is the gallery owner using AI to copy Angel Adam's, he's profiting for himself and not paying any artists, fuck that guy. and then he's also lying about spending months on it, what a joke. Just Trump / Indian levels of shamelessness and venality
This image was taken at the same thrift store I’ve taken pictures at before. The back of the store returned a “Kids Place” area and I felt it had a very empty and nostalgic feel
Hey bro, when you've got a series of pictures, better to put them into a single thread. Or if it's not a large number of pics, consider even just putting them in /rpt/ or some other related general.Cool spot. I don't think it's (presented as) expansive enough for me to get the "liminal" vibe. But I'm sure there's good shots lurking in there somewhere.
Haven't posted in a while.Leica M3 + Nokton 50mm f/1.5 II + Tri-X. Self scan.
>>4514106
>>4514107
>>4514108Last one. Thanks for checking it out.
>>4513949>>4514102same vibe
>>4514110>tf you think you're doing back there buddy
Reply if you're a real mf'er
>>4513894NIKKOR-W 105mm f5.6
>>4513903Does the camera/lens mount come with a helicoid? Good lens, but too long for the type of camera IMO. Precise composition and focusing before infinity will be difficult.A good FL for cameras like that is usually less than 90. Personally I would suggest either 65mm or 47mm super angulons.
>>4513907>helicoid?so it seems. >focusingyou get a ground glass but for that you have to take off the film back which seems like a bit of a hassle every time. the fella making them recommend you make your own markings and do zone focus, which i don't really trust, so that's a drawback 4 me.>I would suggestaight thanks babe.
>>4513909Oh I thought they didn't come with a gg. I have a graflex xlsw, which is a far superior contraption made from real metals and I use a universal viewfinder on a hot shoe + 69 back + zone focus and a 47mm lens. Never had focusing or composition issues and I never use the gg.If you want precise focus/composition you're going to be stuck on a tripod with a 105mm, babe.
>>4483539What is going on here? Is the low contrast because of the fog and bad lighting? Everything is grey except the tree on the right side. How to fix this? would a yellow filter improve when shooting in nature? Some binoculars have yellow filters for more contrast in the woods.
