[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/p/ - Photography

Name
Options
Subject
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]

[Catalog] [Archive]

File: 1000186424.jpg (3.42 MB, 4096x3072)
3.42 MB JPG
guys pls help... my tc-201 got stuck on Helios 81n and I can't remove it.
the lever is half way down and has slight play, but there's no way I can get it to move, I can't get any shims anywhere, and the screws on the back of the tele are stuck and I even stripped one... is there anything can be done? I smacked it tried rotating and whatever else, do I need to drill out the screws on the back of the tele now?

the aperture ring is overhanging so I can't get to the pin itself...
1 reply omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4524203
not an option everything is closed and I'm poor
>>
File: 1000186428.jpg (3.17 MB, 3072x4096)
3.17 MB JPG
I took the front of the lens out but still can't get to the latch, need to take apart more but not sure how
>>
>>4524211
nvm it can't be reached like that.
I'm fucked. I have to drill.
>>
You need to take apart the tele, although the stripped screw is a problem. I'd try to get a good screwdriver that bites into the screws that you can take out first, also use WD40.
>>
>>4524244
I tried penetrating oil and acetone, didn't budge.
I think I'll try ordering a micro tap set to try and unscrew it like that.
hopefully it works and I won't have to drill.

File: loqualscape.jpg (3.82 MB, 5862x3913)
3.82 MB JPG
groundskeepers and hikers unite!
post your most grandiose landscapes
64 replies and 41 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4523775
Thanks for the compliments. First pic is low tide at ao neng Thailand,

Second pic, Andes foothills along the way to MP f/8.

Wish I had some tip or critiques for you, but I’m a noob too. Nice pic tho, I appreciate the foreground consideration
>>
File: 05268.jpg (2.16 MB, 2965x1891)
2.16 MB JPG
>>
im shy lol
>>
>>4523740
Oh cool! Ao Nang was awesome when I went, sadly didn’t get to stay that long. Should have spent all my time there instead of Phuket.
>>
File: DSC02282_2.jpg (3.69 MB, 6000x4000)
3.69 MB JPG

File: rt57_field_sunset.jpg (425 KB, 1920x1080)
425 KB JPG
I thought freeware was a meme until I tried RawTherapee and Darktable, and quickly realized the amount of neetbucks I would've saved had I not used Lightroom sooner. I don't even take pictures regularly.

Why do photographers shill a corporation with comical levels of greed?
37 replies and 2 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
File: Japratings.png (11 KB, 468x163)
11 KB PNG
>>4523835
C1 is TOP MINT
LR is MINT
PS is ALMOST MINT

However,
PS is required for heavier edits / more "creative" shit. You theoretically could just use GIMP for that but unfortunately PS is just better. If your edits are more standard and serviced by the photo software alone sufficiently, then you're much better off with C1 perpetual. With that in mind I'd avoid LR and just go C1+PS if needed.
>>
>>4522997

darktable is filled with options
difficult to get nice colors
>>
>>4523965
Why is c1>lrc?
>>
>>4524198
C1 isn't full of Adobe-tier jewism.
>>
>>4524239
Like what?
I ll pirate both so price is not a problem

File: goodboi.jpg (59 KB, 750x1334)
59 KB JPG
I'll start
1 reply and 1 image omitted. Click here to view.
>>
File: folder.jpg (857 KB, 3000x2000)
857 KB JPG
>>
File: IMG_20260519_195859.jpg (3.5 MB, 3648x5472)
3.5 MB JPG
wigglebeast
>>
File: IMG_20260821_140639.jpg (3.46 MB, 3648x5472)
3.46 MB JPG
>>4524154
>>
File: 1787300680344.jpg (766 KB, 1200x1600)
766 KB JPG
>>
File: Untitled (16)_1.jpg (2.83 MB, 1949x2435)
2.83 MB JPG
Chiquitin

Color doesn't matter.

Today when you can adjust colors just by pressing a button there's nothing more fake than a color.

You should only shot B&W.

Black and White photography is real and pure. Shape, shadow and light - this is what makes your photography look special, not some bright oversaturation. If your picture looks good without colors then your picture is worthy
93 replies and 32 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
File: 1366291412128.jpg (26 KB, 470x311)
26 KB JPG
>>4522400
The American is immunized against all dangers: one may call him an unwashed pleb, academically bricked, brainlet, neuron-deficient or brandfag, it all runs off him like water off a raincoat. But display some signs of being cultured and you will be astonished at how he recoils, how injured he is, how he suddenly shrinks back: "I’ve been found out".
>>
>>4522406
>doesn't deny being a brown thirdworldist
>>
>>4502479
Love her nails, so perfect
>>
>>4522651
>brown
Kek, not even worth addressing
>thirdworldist
You know, I'm somewhat of a rational thinker myself.
>>
>>4502479
Black and white is the laziest form of photography

I thought he was le gay? Or did he just hire a model to beat the allegations?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3BG-5n_lxpI
>>
File: hand-on-shoulder.png (110 KB, 498x408)
110 KB PNG
>>4522971
> When you are so obsessed with being gay you believe a random youtuber who almost never talk about his personnal life and shows 0 sign of gayness is gay and his wife is a model he hired to """beat the allegations""" (actually just your mental illness)
>>
>>4522971
What the fuck does have to do with photography? I don't care if this man takes it up the ass or not.
>>
>>4522974
TRUTH
>>
>>4522974
he's got a MAN van though
>>
>>4522971
Literally who?

File: 4chanStrawpoll.png (115 KB, 671x654)
115 KB PNG
https://strawpoll.com/7MZ0kRk7rgo
9 replies and 2 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
I should join, win some and then mog /p/ with timestamped photos of my trophies.
jk lol, I can't go to Siena in Autumn and I can't inject poz into my work no matter the reward. Tegridy, as they say.
But find me a respectable contest even if funded by a faggot billionaire and I'll be glad to join.
>>
>>4524069
>t. Winner of best fursuit photographer, midwest furfest 2019 2020 2023 and 2024
>>
>>4524080
If I went to the American Midwest to shoot furfags I'd use something closer to 7.62mm than to 400mm if you catch my drift.
>>
>>4524104
Ah, a pentax Q enjoyer.
>>
>>4524123
kek, obviously Pentax Q is what I meant :^)
>http://www.photocritic.org/articles/pentax-q-s1-announcement
>Is the new Pentax Q-S1 all fur coat and no knickers?

File: 2.png (4.65 MB, 2634x1358)
4.65 MB PNG
why do stock photos always have this ugly neutral, super low contrast look? does it have a name? I call it the 'unsplash look', but I don't know why this is so popular. it looks cheap and it is not eye-catching at all.
17 replies and 3 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4524074
>They posted collage of entirely differently edited photos
its not a collage it's just a screenshot from some stock photo site as an example
>>
>>4524070
You are so out of touch it's painful. AI hasn't generated obvious artifacts like 6 fingers in YEARS at this point. Holy shit get with the times
>>
>>4524084
The photos in OP post are not AI retard, the stock site in question does not allow AI photos
>>
>>4524089
>They don't allow it therefore it doesn't happen.

double digit iq we are dealing with here
>>
>>4524096
You're retarded if you think stock sites can't tell the difference between ai photos and real ones when uploaded

Why has the world abandoned photo shoots of good looking women?
99% of anything I see now is selfies and if its a photoshoot its just to sell clothing or some super generic looking agency testshoot.
10 years ago or whatever the world was full of every good looking girl doing multiple photoshoots just for content.
What happened?
70 replies and 32 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4515454
why? are you a zoomer incel/femcel?
>>
>>4502542
Go on instagram and find a model. Message her and ask her what her rates are.
Once you have a portfolio it is much easier to find TFP models.
>>
>>4481290
Most of them aren't.
You have a handful who make ridiculous money (literally - the top 10 earners account for over a quarter of all onlyfans revenue), and the rest who are making basically fuck all.
>>
>>4517308
That is true of every industry ever, it doesn't mean having a job isnt profitable.
>>
File: f0c09c7bcfc55b8b.jpg (26 KB, 537x768)
26 KB JPG
OP isnt trying

File: DN-03889.jpg (522 KB, 1306x1828)
522 KB JPG
Going to dump a bunch of photos I've taken over time, enjoy. Criticism and feedback is welcome since I want to know what anons think or what I could do better.
54 replies and 39 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4523917
that's just another version of the "photo is good because I like it". "There is no skill to drawing because I like this drawing in which I see no skill". Whatever question you encounter in life, you can always answer "it depends, it's a matter of personnal preference". Relativism is not an opinion, is just a basic concept to keep in mind and remember most things are ultimately subjective. By denying the skill ceilings are different when learning photo and drawing, you're just refusing to think.
>>
>>4523917
Unironically looks kino, reminds me of some of those weird drawings you'd see in 1920s upper class magazines or something.
>>
>>4523484
>>4523499
>>4523446
I like these ones. Adelaide is boring as fuck too so nice job.
>>
>>4523926
never there was any mention of "skill" in this conversation.
it takes more skill to break the rules than follow them.
>>
>>4523977
>there is no rules
>it takes more skill to break the rules than to follow them
yes

File: vidgen ssd.jpg (401 KB, 2218x2322)
401 KB JPG
Summer 2026 edition

All video related questions and discussion is intended for this thread. Here we discuss techniques, gear and anything else related to capturing video footage. Please don't pretend to be an expert if you don't know what you're talking about. Kindly leave your ego at the door.
Posting short films/scripts or other work you've done is encouraged.
We tend to use and recommend DSLRs/mirrorless cameras because they provide phenomenal picture quality for their price, have large sensors (ie the same size used in high-end cinema cameras, and larger) and have interchangeable lenses.
In contrast, consumer camcorders often have much smaller sensors and a fixed lens.

>STICKY - https://text.is/QZ1J
>Helpful guide, additional books and more in-depth FAQs - https://web.archive.org/web/20200926115310/https://pastebin.com/kG0gRmTZ

>NO ONE CARES WHAT AN EXPERT YOU THINK YOU ARE. IF YOU’RE ASKING BASIC-AS-SHIT QUESTIONS, YOU CAN’T BE ALL THAT GREAT. SEE ABOVE

Previous thread >>4499500

Quick FAQS

Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
171 replies and 6 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4514476
How retarded would it be to use stock video that is similar to my skill level to fluff up my portfolio to appear larger than it is. I've come to realize how big of an advantage you are able to gain from lying about your background and experience after the Cambridge professor.
>>
>>4523785
meh, it can't hurt if you can recreate that image.
HOWEVER, they recognize the stock footage and be turned off that you used it on "your" portfolio.
>>
>>4523785
both retarded and bitchmade, a betrayal of artistic intention
>>
>>4523785
Everyone is using AI now for everything. resume, interview, sample reels- everything.
FAKE IT TILL YOU MAKE IT XD !!!!
>>
>>4514476
which codec is better to encode your 4chanz webms/mp4 videos?
do you prefer vp9 or x264?
do you notice any difference between both in filesize or quality?

Only A Sony Is Good Enough™

Last time sony won: >>4522451
343 replies and 45 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4524079
desu, depth of frame is just a preference and more is not always better despite what anyone might tell you.
>>
>>4524111
>other than looking more like a professional so people dont realize you’re a college dropout that couldnt pass a drug test and score a real job.

you say that as if that isn't a major benefit
>>
>>4524090
135 format film double frame: 36x24mm
Full-frame sensor, which was designed and specified specifically to match the above: 36x24mm
Are you retarded?
>>
>>4524110
>Phase One
Massively overpriced pretentious nonsense. More so than usual, that is.
>>
>>4524169
lol clueless retard

File: film.jpg (77 KB, 1080x1080)
77 KB JPG
How long can you let it sit after exposing but before developing? Online I see everything from "you should develop within a few days of exposure" to "you can leave it up till its expiry date no problem". I asked a local camera shop and they said 6-10 months before you start to see degradation depending on the film. Who's telling the truth? I don't remember ever worrying about this back when I was using disposable cameras for everything.
3 replies and 1 image omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4520365
>I dont find that much difference inbetween the shots i took on 2018 and 2023
Maybe worth mentioning degradation speed is logarithmic with time. I bought a roll of portra 400 in a shop that was not air conditioned during a 33°c+ heatwave and it was already too degraded for the result to be professional. But i'm sure it could have stayed in the shop for months and I would still have had a clear image, only fogged and color shifted.
>>
>>4520365
looks like the streets from eyes wide shut. shame it's so disheveled.
>>
>>4520311
I have a few rolls from 2003-2007, I'll let you know. There are photos of a hooker getting arrested on one of them, I'll post those.
>>
>>4520311
From what I've been told, it's temperature that matters the most. I had some film that had been exposed and then passed expiry by 3 years and it looked completely fine when I developed it, I didn't need to push it or any of that shit. So just keep it cool and it can last a good amount of time.

I think the only thing that is affected no matter what is shadows after some amount of time, so you'll end up with lost details in really dark parts of the image. So maybe develop night photos ASAP in that case.
>>
>>4520311
Store your exposed film in the freezer -> It will last as long as you want. Many Many years.

Store your film in a cupboard... Could last a few years and be fine. It all depends how hot your cupboard gets and how long you want to heat cycle it your film over many summers...


I store all my film, exposed and unexposed in the freezer.

File: IMG_0098v2.png (1.59 MB, 2000x1334)
1.59 MB PNG
I am going to post random images I made which I have also edited and I would love my /p/iss bros to give me feedback on my composition, but mostly editing style... or direct me towards an editing style that would fit me.

>feedback on composition
>feedback on editing
>direct my towards my own style

Starting with opening image...
67 replies and 41 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
File: IMG_0203_01.png (616 KB, 1204x848)
616 KB PNG
>>
File: IMG_0117.jpg (923 KB, 2011x1419)
923 KB JPG
>>4502387
I made this picture better. I think I improved a little also in my editing skills.
>>
File: IMG_0023.jpg (946 KB, 2005x1413)
946 KB JPG
>>4519436
Here something new on my travels. Since then I feel like I have taken enough photos and have been chilling since. Photo gear is collecting dust. Want to travel again, this time to northern Poland or even Prag (in August). Still unsure, due to the temperature, which just takes the fun out of sight seeing.
(pic related taken on same Island)
>>
File: IMG_1196.jpg (992 KB, 2011x1419)
992 KB JPG
>>4519438
>>
bump

would it be technically possible to control ISO and shutter speed (if electronic) on a per pixel basis?
14 replies omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4523753
>iso is just the exposure slider in photoshop
holy retard
>>
>>4523765
With more and more linear ISO invariance sensors it pretty much is, you might get a second base ISO at 400 or 600 where thenoise reduction hardware kicks in but pretty much any high ISO shot is just this base ISO digitally clipped and exposure increased, very similar to increasing the exposure slider. The noise will be the same, all exposure properties will be the same. It has been for 10 years.
>>
don't know where else to ask this but you lot seem savvy enough

What is the easiest way to have a GPS app running on my phone while shooting photos, and then I dump the photos and the geolocation data to my computer and have the nearest/interpolated location attached to the EXIF of each photo?
>>
>>4523318
>>>4523318
>control ISO and shutter speed (if electronic) on a per pixel basis
Why not do in post process on the raw pixels? Cannot see a different outcome.
>>
>>4523778
Dual conversion gain sensors are not noise reduction hardware you dunning kruger ass schizo retard snoyim

Its basically turning off a high dynamic range circuit that stores more charge to switch to a more sensitive and less noisy one that cant store as much charge but detects finer increments.

Noise reduction is what pentax does. No extra light is stored. No extra shadows are detected. Its just a noise reduction slider on a chip for when the camera processor is too weak to run a good NR algorithm.

Modern sensors read both of these circuits simultaneously (sony a7v, lumix s1rii, om om1ii) or sequentially (lumix g9ii).


[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.