It's your 1st amendment rights to use that camera anon.
>>4473614this is aerial photography
>>4473614not a very important question. more importantly: when does it become worth looking at?>>4473222nice pic and nice trips
>>4474683
why must the sky be so beautiful
>>4473134Nah I was just posting bait sorry. It's a nice picture
Maybe try adding something interesting to your sunset photos anon
>>4474590Did she shoot you after you took the pic?
>>4474592She shot at my heart with her poses
I do like a good sky gradient
Where do (you) host your /p/ortfolio?
>>4469145Depends on why you want to share your images. For business? Probably. For the joy of shooting? Fuck no.I have a web page hosted on my own server at home, where I run an anti-AI service to block scrapers.
>>4463794We are returning to family photos and albums. Just took some photos of my cousin's first grandchild and made some prints for her.. it is how to enjoy photography these days. Sharing with frens and family.
Right now Cargo but I'm not a huge fan. It's ok. I want to rebuild it with a static site generator but I haven't had the time.
If you are booking paid work you need Instagram, if you are using Instagram and not booking work you are the dictionary definition of brain dead. For all other purposes Flickr does the job.If you have massive narcissism you will need to create your own website but that’s a you problem.
>>4474622this is based but requires to have a social life. something that is rare on this site
hey /p/rotogs, how do you think this photo was taken?it dates from 2010, but based on the debris and vignette it was shot on film - so I'm thinking a monopod is more likely than a droneI also just think this is a really cool image and captures the vibe perfectly
>>4474442>reduced to name calling in lieu of a thoughtOk anon
>>4474207It's very likely to be Velvia (purple clouds, no dynamic range).This guy >>4474219 is right that it's a polariser darkening the sky, but wrong about the camera. It is 1000% a slide film colour scheme, and slide film dust visible all over the top left, and most jarringly the shepherd's crook shaped pube in the middle of the frame.Old mate >>4474236 has correctly identified the likely vantage point and field of view.Lastly; it's scanned on a potato, as 35mm Velvia should look better than most digital cameras.
>>4474467ding ding dingI reckon that all sound about accurate, but I'm still unconvinced it's taken from a structure, as it's probably depicting the sand bank at one foot islandsadly this is the highest quality version I could find, so it's likely the original scan, wonder if the photographer still has the negatives...?
>>4474207So, I did some digging, found who I believe to be the photographer, and sent him an Email. I'll reply with an update if he emails me back.
>>4474653It's worth noting this photo seems to be connected to Aitutaki. It appears in videos from people at the Aitutaki Private Island Lagoon Resort.
Hello /p/, I want to take photos like picrel but have no experience in photography and no camera, I'm willing to spend up to around €1,000 but would rather cheaper as I am not wealthy, anything in the 400-500 range is a nice amount for me. What camera/specs do I need? Any lenses? I know photography terminology as I've experience with 3dcg and they seem to use the same terms there, as well as a bit of experience in just using the pro mode of my phone camera.
>>4474353DSLR in a nutshell.
>>4474436Is that huskeyfag walking his dogs?
>>4474415The Butlerian Jihad will be developed in caffenol, mark my words AI
>>4461548You need a high red camera like the Sony A7CR, paired with a sharp GM lens. If your subject is trees, leaves, or anything green in general, Sony is the natural choice because of their propensity for beautiful green hues in their jpgs.
no coloreds allowed
>>4474387He is risen.
Rank the Trump Portraits
>>44321143 looks straight up looks like the inverted shadow hitler censorship in German edition of Hearts of Iron 4 okay I don't give a shit.
>>4471647>is actually propaganda photographynow you know why most known photogs are jewish. kikes control everything
>>4432179No points for originality I'm afraid
>>4434213We do, fuck you, I am not even into photography, this is my first time on this board, and pixel dotting looks like absolute fucking trash if you're not fucking blind.
I like 4, it's the most posterity / history minded portrait.
Any love for the Game Boy Camera and printer here?Sure nowadays even the chinkest of cameras and printers may be better with printing via phone bigger and clearer photos but there's a certain charm and fun in doing with with a Game Boy of all things.
I really enjoy the Game Boy Camera, bought mine around when it was new. I really wanted a Pocket at the time, but couldn't afford it - just waited for the GBC. Never really bothered with the printer even though I had one, it was too novel and not very useful - unlike other cooler accessories like Pocket Pikachu 2 or the GB modem which I actually used. Maybe a decade or so ago, I bought a pretty cool little device online which lets me link-cable transfer the pictures to an SD card. Making photography a habit has been on my to-do. But it's always just been a fun toy for me to play with sometimes, along with Mario Paint and Electroplankton and such.>>4464072This is the secret nobody bothers with. You can actually manually convert the files to be color, the data is there. I wonder if anybody has made a program which does it?
>>4474456>You can actually manually convert the files to be color, the data is there.WRONG.pngBut you can get colors by taking three separate shots with different color filters and stacking them in post.
>>4474463http://www.ruleofthirds.com/gameboy/process.htmlAh yes, you are right. Pardon me. I was going off of a 20 year old memory, so it was hazy. Crose enough.
>>4474456Other anon is correct. I took 3 filtered shots and composited them.
>>4468232As someone who never owned a gameboy and cares very little about it, this performative "disinterest" is so fucking retarded. Absolute slop for the cynicism slurpers.The concept is fun. You should consider killing yourself if you get this pressed about some niche shit.
I like the aesthetics of tobbaco, zippos and leather
>>4473779Missing a gun
>>4473783>tfw canadaa 1911 would be my choice
>>4473779>I like the aestheticsYou're just addicted to socially acceptable narcotics
>>4473779you must be 18 to post on 4chan.
>>4473779White thrash photography is a valid field of photography
Should industry switch back to film for better skin tones?
Cum on, don't be shy
>>4474453As if any porn addict cares for skin tones
>>4474458/thread
>>4474453actually intersting in another way: how does one light porn. full frontal no shadows soft lighting seems amateur. three point setup does hide too much and is too moody i would argue.
>>4474455>hair like and old hag that just wake up>dress them in sailor uniformsWhat did they mean by this
Sprawl 'em EditionPreviously: >>4470709
testan saturation level
I love my Coolpix. Hope it'll stay longer with me.
>>4474508This cow looks like it's melting
>>4474364almost looks like a drawing
Maybe nobody cares and maybe I'm dumb to be surprised but I just want to stress how unglamorous actual pro photographers - and creatives in general - are.A lot of them are kind of losers. The image I had of photographers being cerebral, well-rounded and cultured guys has not proven to be true at all.I work in healthcare but I run a small business doing sound engineering work. I do very specialized work recording live concerts and classical music, usually working alongside photographers/video crews. A lot of them are honestly just fucking weirdos, at some point I probably was too. It's a bit like pic-related (apologies for normie meme)I mention this because prior to this I did much more paid photography gigs, but I got sick of it because a) the profit margins are a joke and b) I didn't fit in with the people there and they knew it. I'm not saying I'm better than them, but it was not the focused, intellectual crowd I hope for.An anon here once saidA that he got into photo-journalism because it is a field that vagrants and ne'er-do-wells can get into and I 100% see it.Older guys are good though, they're always helpful and polite.
>>4474424>>4474476You guys are both wrong. Photography IS art. If it's not art then it's not photography but photojournalism, photosurveillance or other related discipline. As Ansel Adams used to say: you don't take a photograph, you make it. Photography isn't pressing a button.
>>4474478>Photography isn't pressing a buttonTrue>Ansel Adams used to say: you don't take a photograph, you make it.This citation is never enough to reinforce your statement.To me, it sounds like "Don't just press the release cable and hope for the best, finger crossed. Use your brain before you shoot it."And especially for Ansel Adams, i don't think he would have ever thought photography as art. I think he thought himself as just a recorder, rememberer of the magnificence of the mother nature.
>>4474486The entire f/64 movement is about photography as fine art without the need for pictorialist manipulation. Another quote from him:>Photography is more than a medium for factual communication of ideas. It is a creative art.If it's not art, then it's not photography either even if you're exposing a photosensitive medium.
I don't give a fuck really about anythingI just take my camera go out and shootI don't get money or recognition for it and I don't pretend to be anything other than some faggot with a camera.I don't care about culture or technique or the history of photography, or any particular styles. I don't care.
>>4474497This is the way.The moment you're just another random faggot who happens to have a camera on them and that's all, that's the moment you are free of all the /p/ bullshit.I want to record moments of my life and cool shit, and do it myself in a way that gives me quality output. A phone doesn't suffice, and I have money to spend because I'm not some random brown person, so I bought nice gear.But I'm still just some faggot with a camera and that's the best way to treat it.
I have been passionate about street photography for many years, but I’ve always been a bit shy. Now I’ve been working on being more approachable as I’m taking photos, and this is what I’ve been working on so far:1: I have been working on smiling with both my eyes and my mouth. I don’t have a mirror at home, and it’s been hard practicing in public bathrooms, but I have made some serious progress so far. 2: I have started using a hat. It’s more stylish and I think the women will find it stylish as well. I have severe acne on my scalp, and I find it that wool stops it from oozing through. 3: I am working on losing weight. I have lost 2.7kg the past 8 months. It’s a slow grind but I’m on a steady course. 4: I have been practicing conversations. Mostly with my grandmother. She can’t respond, but I can see it in her eyes that she is captivated when I speak. 5: I have been thinking about getting a strap system so I can bring with me more lenses, and I think it would look more professional if I have them on display and not just in a backpack. That’s pretty much it. I don’t have much money and I’m working with what I have.Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>4474226Another one >>>/fa/18560857
>>4474180Is the AI in the thread with us now, cANON?
>>4474276It touched me on my special place
>>4474226>>4474260I think it's pretty funny, personally.
Back in my day, trolls used to have higher standards and bait needed to be much more subtle to hook anyone. How far have this board fallen..Posting a pic to not be a fag.
Summer's over, did you get shit done? editionAll video related questions and discussion is intended for this thread. Here we discuss techniques, gear and anything else related to capturing video footage. Please don't pretend to be an expert if you don't know what you're talking about. Kindly leave your ego at the door.Posting short films/scripts or other work you've done is encouraged.We tend to use and recommend DSLRs/mirrorless cameras because they provide phenomenal picture quality for their price, have large sensors (ie the same size used in high-end cinema cameras and higher) and have interchangeable lenses.In contrast, consumer camcorders often have much smaller sensors and a fixed lens.>STICKY - https://text.is/QZ1J>Helpful guide, additional books and more in-depth FAQs - https://web.archive.org/web/20200926115310/https://pastebin.com/kG0gRmTZ>NO ONE CARES WHAT AN EXPERT YOU THINK YOU ARE. IF YOU’RE ASKING BASIC-AS-SHIT QUESTIONS, YOU CAN’T BE ALL THAT GREAT. SEE ABOVEPrevious thread >>4450377Quick FAQSComment too long. Click here to view the full text.
If anyone can recommend a /t/ for a relatively recent release of cc, that would be great. [blog] I just requested to reduce my hours at work down to part time, so that I can focus on my passion project (experimental film), but now my budget is very tight [/blog]All I could find on here were:>>>/t/1212777>>>/t/1287963Both the same, and appear to be the outdated CS as they're labelled as "master collection" (I'm guessing the "2022" is for the torrent release, as CS got discontinued in 2012, along with the master collection branding).And:>>>/t/1297131I'll probably give this a shot, as it's labelled as CC, but it would be cool to have a fellow /p/een directly endorse a release for my peace of mind.>>4468570>showing footage of themselves holding the camera and trying to look epic You have to understand, they are the face of their own brand, and showing off the product is secondary to promoting their brand.>>4468579Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>4473430>they're labelled as "master collection"Ignore what I said here, turns out people releasing CC bundles continue using "master collection"
>>4473430>AI tools. ElevenLabs (paid) and Adobe Podcast Enhance (free), can both be used to remove instances of peak.This sort of highlights the issue. There are solutions that aren't being utilised. Why? Because that requires knowledge of its existence and skill to implement, along with additional time spent actually doing it. It all adds up. There are hundreds of "solutions" in post to every issue. But anyone with experience knows that fixing it in the shoot is always preferable to fixing it in post.
what's the least retarded mic setup for nature sounds on a camera while hiking? my camera does ok video but has trash built in mics. i'm not recording people or myself, just nature sounds. clippy with wind screens on backpack straps?
>>4473752Have you tried buying an external recorder and then experimenting with a cheap lav mic and a cheap omni mic? See which sounds better for you, and then invest in a more expensive one
Let's have a thread on Greg GirardYeah I am thinking he is kino.
well, he is not exactly herzog... but i really enjoy his american stopover book. i also like his "early" hongkong/japan works too, i am not too sure about his more recent stuff, the sakura one doesnt quite hit
>>4474466>well, he is not exactly herzog... That's a good thing you stupid cinefag, this is a photography board in case you didn't notice.
>>4474473obv talking about fred herzog you dumb fucking cunt
>>4474477Ironically this little exchange proves cineape's thesis that nobody gives a shit about stills and that cinema is the real endgame.
>>4474480i do. i rarely watch cinema these days, yet go through many printed books.
