What do I say when normies rebuke me for taking pictures of people in public without their knowledge?If I say they're in public and shouldn't expect to never have their picture taken; they still say it's creepy, voyeuristic, and an invasion of privacy.
>>4512177>What do I say when normies rebuke me for taking pictures of people in public without their knowledge?has it ever actually happened to you though?
>>4512286>can be looked by everyonepossibilities are dumb argumentyou could look at that same guy if you were there as well
>>4512177"It's street photography, can't really capture a candid scene if I go up and get everyone's permission, can I?
>>4514984Not bad, although some people can be really aggressive in insisting you have a sinister motive… so many people are keen on catching a predator… so you might try reasoning like this with them in vain…
>>4512177>What do I say when normies rebuke me for taking pictures of people in public without their knowledge?It's ok, my mom said I can.
Kodak Charmera kings rise up
I make collage with mine
>>4515059very nice. My favorite output from one of these I've seen so far
>>4515013lol, the fake film frame and the date overlayed over the sprocket holes is top tier cringe
>>4515059very based
>>4515059that is very cool
what is the best action camera for travel and diving in 2026?
The one you have with you.
>hey /p/ what camera…Newest sonyCanon 5DIIUpgrade your monitorNikon D200Get a tripodPentax K10DPhaseone IQ3 TrichromaticCircular polarizerFuji S5 proZenza Bronica SQ-ANikon FE2The one you have with youCapture oneNot micro four thirdsComment too long. Click here to view the full text.
So when are we doing this again?
wtf is this fingerbox shit thread?
>>4504282Me on the very far right of the photo.
>>4508078Nothing wrong with that. It's just part of her character.
not a single person could find a clean pair of shoes wtf
>>4515077It was a street photo meet, not a rotary club meeting.
5.4 is out, what do we think bros?
>>4490529>the biggest issue for me is chromatic aberration. none of the modules i've tried seem to get rid of it>>4490532>Handling CA is tough and I don't have lots of practiceI recently tried the RAW Chromatic Aberration tool and it seemed to work quite well with no sliders to fiddle with - not using the lens CA corrections at all.Any ill effects I'm not noticing?
>>4504833Manual lens geometry correction is missing from latest version of Darktable.
If my camera lacks noise profiles in Darktable, is there anything I can do? I was always using profiled denoising so far.
>>4509622Try Ansel instead
It's uphttps://www.darktable.org/2026/06/darktable-5.6.0-released/
Hey /p/, after years of slowly learning the basics of photography, I think I'm ready to get into the world of portraits. The one small issue is that I don't have any good sources of references other than here for learning the different poses, angles, lighting, and everything else to make decent photos. Don't get me wrong, there are amazing threads that pop up here, but with the gear talk and the shit posts, I really want to branch out and find some from the outside. Instagram is what most people say, but I also want to find stuff that's unconventional or just really creative. So are there any websites, books, or photographers you anons can recommend to check out? Also would love to hear some tips and pointers for a noob like me starting out, especially when it comes to "directing" and posing a model
>>4514971how are they for transporting? I'm only asking because I don't have a studio or any empty room to work with, so I'll probably be doing stuff in different locations outdoors
>>4514977They are kind of heavy, but the legs rotate so they can lay flat. You'll also want atleast one sandbag or equivalent 25-ish pound weight for each c-stand that you have.
>>4514728I really want to know how to do poses for self portraits that don't make it seem obvious that I was alone.
>>4514999wouldn't a mirror help with that?
>>4515051Speaking of mirrors, for OP, Corwin Prescott made clever use of mirrors to shoot inside rooms with longer focal lengths
I’m thinking of getting a shift lens but I understand a view camera can make the same movements, and tilt-shift lenses are also available for most ILCs. Have any of you used a shift lens, tilt-shift lens or a view camera? What did you use it for? What was it like using one? Frustrating? Simple? Did you need any other accessories to make the process work? How did you like the final results? Was it worth the expense and effort? Is digital perspective correction just as effective?Now that I’ve really begun to focus on perspective in my images it’s all too obvious how even a small tilt of the image plane away from parallel with the subject causes distortion. Do you care about keystoning in your pictures? >picrelThe shift scale on the Laowa 20mm f/4 Shift.
>>4510346Do you know of any examples where these lenses are used on actual miniature scenes, or macro (close-up, at least) photography?
>>4514872Most people will use a technical camera with bellows instead of a T/S lens for those things. You get much better flexibility/control.
>>4514873I get that. Was just wondering what effects it might produce.
>>4514878Works the exact same for macro except you need a lot more movement to shift the focal plane or change perspective the same way you would at lower magnification.Focal plane shifting is basically obsolote outside of creative focus because you have focus stacking.
>>4514881TY
Shot this at Monza Circuit. What do you think about the composition/framing? Camera: Canon EOS R50Lens: RF-S 18-150mm F3.5-6.3 IS STMISO: 200Shutter Speed: 1/100sAperture: f/6.3
>>4512708this is very nice How did you got in to the track?
>>4514674So apparently it's free on some race days, neat.It was a good occasion to use a new camera i never used before (got used from a friend just 2 days ago). A huge upgrade from a 1200d to R6m2.Some attempts were made. Resuld were bad, but i had fun. I really need to learn how to use this machine
>>4515045
>>4515045This was the first attempt at a panning shot.I know it's bad, but there something i like about it
Taken by me at an Old thrift store down town. The store is very old and is a Salvation Army, i thought it would be a good place for photography and it really way
AAAAA IT'S SO LIMINAL
>>4514116
>>4514116I don't see anything liminal about this photo
>>4514742actually liminaldirect flash is eerie, tooVERY NAISU
>>4514531I think it should. Myself, I'm not an enjoyer of the backroom meme, but I like spaces without people and photos without people. So there are going to be different ways to approach the topic.
It is time.
noir filter
>>4514285no wait I’d rather this crop
>>4502246True. BMW supplied the engine for the Fw 190 though.
>>4509999I find iPhone photos oversharpened for any subject. What I tried:> Stock camera ProRawcan drop the sharpness in post (mobile Lightroom) but NR is baked in so you still get a smeary look. Also a hassle to deal with Raws on a freaking phone.> Lightroom camera Pure, unadulterated DNG raw. You can drop both NR and Sharpness all the way and get the most natural look probably. Raw management is also easier because it doesn’t go to your gallery and stays in Lightroom. But you only get 12mp and limited dynamic range because all the AI magic is gone.>Project Indigo I have a love-hate relationship with this one. It does crash occasionally losing shots which is a massive dealbreaker. Sometimes it looks really good, sometimes not so much. It does have that AI look also if you zoom in, but it’s acceptable. And it shoots the exact same RAW as the Lightroom app so you could fix it if you really want.> Halide I found it quite inconsistent and ultimately you get the exact same thing you can get with Lightroom but for free. I’m really not a huge fan of paying for something that should work on my phone already.>Leica LuxSurprisingly good actually. If you ignore all the paid memery it actually does all the basics for free with no annoyances. Standard profile has pleasing, accurate colors, tonality and it just a heif so you don’t need to bother with removing embedded raws to save storage. Sharpness surprisingly seems to be toned down. Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
Thought a thread like this might be useful. Also would appreciate feedback.
first of all, I'm an absolute noob, especially at editing. But i really wanted this pic for personal reasons.>>4514710>blindfrom one eye yes, but that's not an excuseI swear it wasn't there last night, i feel like an absolute retard now>>4514757i know. I tried my best to get it straight in camera, but it was a terrible position to try taking a photo without falling and breaking my leg.Whenever i tried fixing in post the village, mainly the church, always looked weird and fake>>4514744Appreciate the critic.I am now noticing there's way too much grass in other pics i took there. I do like lots of green for some reason, but especially after seeing the other anons better edits i see your point>Here you could have used the river, or even better, the cows.I wanted to have the river more centered, starting from the bottom getting into the village, and keep that gorgeous mountain in the back, but due to other fences being present i couldn't get closer to the river. Are there other ways i could have taken a better pic? Since i might go back there by the end of summer, i want to retry doing a better job>>4514746Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>4514790>can i ask you how did you achieve this look?>https://github.com/andreavolpato/spektrafilmif that feels overwhelming, which 99% will be, and youre on windows/mac, maybe try the rust port and the gui - not as good, but good enough.>https://github.com/turbasvin/spektrafilm-rs/releases/tag/v0.1.2
>>4512370KINO!
>>4513841This looks best.>>4513844Nah he's exposing for an extreme dynamic range scene, he's already clipping windows at this point and should have exposed for less time if anything.Photographing dark night time scenes doesn't mean your photo has to end up being bright.
i shoot jpg and if the picture doesnt come out perfect i delet
Sup nerds, I got the new gear threadIs the Olympus OM-D a good camera?
>>4514990After a time, you may find that having is not so pleasing a thing after all as wanting.
>>4514963Buy a LA-EA5 adapter and experiment with some <$100 Minolta Autofocus lenses. 50mm f1.4 (Sony or Minolta), 28mm f2.8, 35-70mm f4, 35mm f1.8 Sony, 135mm f2.8, APO 100-300mm or 100-400mm, and a fast zoom like a 28-75mm f2.8 (Tokina ATX Pro, Tamron, Konica, etc).A6600 is a great body and still $1000 used. All the newer bodies will give you is slightly better DR + autofocus and better video capability. Instead of wasting $2000-3000 (body only, chances are if you have APSC lenses you'll probably have to sell those too and pick up FF E-Mount which is $$$) just pick up a $200 adapter and $200 worth of lenses and have fun. https://www.ebay.com/itm/800210087128Again, a a6600 is a great camera. The only thing better is a entry level FF mirrorless (a7iii, R8, Z5ii) or a a6700. Even the improvements in AF aren't worth it if you don't have a fast lens that can keep up imo. Its not like you're coming from a a6000 or a Rebel.>>4514995Agreed. Once you have it and the novelty wears off you'll have a camera with <500 shutter counts waiting to get traded in sitting in your closet collecting mold.
>>4514995A life lesson really. My ex was trying to get me back badly and for a long time, then immediately lost interest when I finally agreed.
>used a 167v film-era speedlight on my DSLR rated for 25v flashes maximum for hundreds of shotsit still works somehow
>>4514882That’s what pushed me towards getting a Fuji also. Sad, because I really liked early iPhones specifically because they used to have a natural pleasant rendering compared to your usual android. Sometimes I think it’s just nostalgia but then I go back and look at the photos and they ARE better in every possible way.
Three Rolls of Kodak Ultramax 400Presented ChronologicallyPreviously: >>4509044
fin and sayonara
>>4511329You need to fix your exposure bro
>>4511380this ones nice the way the lights look and bounce off of the carscool vibe and dimensionality
>>4511411>>4511368i really like the colours on these two
Has anyone here used these services to make money? Picrel is the main Australian one, Australian Associated Press. Seems a lot more interesting than stock photography. I don’t really have more to say, just curious to hear about other people’s experiences with organisations like these.
>>4512332Sounds interesting, I can't say I'd even thought about it before and just assumed the press had their own people for their own networks. So you just submit stock images that appear on news articles then? Is that what it is?
>>4512335Yeah, exactly.
no links or further discussion OP? why even make the thread lmao
>>4512335It's an Australian Newswire much like Reuters It was founded by another of the Murdoch family, Keith if I remember correctly.
>Sepia toning is a chemical photographic process which changes the appearance of black-and-white prints to brown.>Most digital cameras and photo software include a sepia filter to mimic the appearance of sepia-toned prints.Post your sepia photos!
Sepia photos always make me think of a big city in the 40s and 50s for some reason. I never seen any modern photos with the look though, it seems like normies just hate it for some reason.
>>4509578I thought sepia is retarded but now I see what the point was. Even it being monochrome it looks more colored and pleasing to the eye than BW.
I prefer normal selenium toning since it's more subdued and neutral but night time city shots always look great in sepia.
