Give me your most abstract images related to cameras.
>>4492136
>>4492137
>>4492138
>>4492140
We rate them on the couch together, looking at them on the TV, then I delete the bad ones from our Linux server before sending a big archive to cloud.We do this process once a year, around new year's.If anyone is interested, I'll link the github. What other tools would you suggest that have a high WAF "Wife acceptance factor" for this process?
>>4489605Slave morality, imagine taking photos for the approval of others. You're so henpecked it hurts lol
>>4489605Interesting you make this post just as I began using FastStone as my image viewer. I edit in RawTherapee but it is so bad for quickly viewing photos and culling. It’s way too slow. FastStone, on the other hand, gives me a full-screen view with click to zoom and I can press a button to tag the photos I want to keep then sort out the untagged photos into a trash folder. It’s so much better than RawTherapee.
>>4489609And interesting you say that, because our previous app was faststone. I just wanted a more couch friendly / dumbed down UX.
>>4489611Don't forget Nomacs.
Planes, Trains, and Automobiles EditionPlease post film photos, talk about film photography, film gear like cameras, film stocks, news, and tips/tricks in this thread.Also talk about darkroom practices, enlargers, photo paper, techniques like dodging/burning, tools, and equipment related to enlarging, developing, and printing.Thread Question: Do you develop yourself or let a lab do it for you? Previous thread: >>4482671
>>4491988Also, are multiple exposures a meme or do people actually do them?How about tricolor/trichrome?
>>4491992If you have a cool idea for a multi exposure then go for it bro. Why would the idea of it being a meme stop you if its a cool idea? Trichromes are cool, but can be tricky. Dollanon posted one in this thread or the previous one I think using 4x5 film.Just don't underexpose your film and youll be golden.
>>4491988I liked mine so much I got a second one. They work well in Program mode. Pretty hard to screw up. What kind of film will you primarily be shooting?Multi exposures and trichromes are memes. Don't let that stop you from having fun if you want to try them.
Is anyone up on information about Horizon(t) panorama cameras? Looking for a 202 and so far I've understood that a lot of these can be in pretty shitty condition mechanically. The 303 seems better in this regard but apparently the lens isn't as nice.
Reply if you're a real mf'er
>>4491421Rolleiflex is quite compact. Roughly the size of a 24-70 2.8 kind of lens. The shape packs very nicely.
>>4491421Fair, maybe try the Makina 67 or GF670, maybe even the Super Ikonta III or IV.
>>4482553I have option to buy cheap Mamiya ZD, I have GFX50 but for some reason I'm somewhat disappointed with the output (also sold the 50 F3.5 GFX stinker) .. any advice?
>>4492037Do it for fun
>>4492037from what ive read in the past 30 seconds it looks like the zd is pretty uncommon to find and has a physically larger sensor than the gfx50, i would get it just for the novelty if i had the cash to burn, the images it puts out look pretty nice too
Got a Fuji X-E5 kit for Christmas. Sharing the first pics SOOC. Not the best photographer, but I can tell I’m going to love using it. Plus it’s my first camera that’s truly mine, so how could I not love it?
5dII better
>>4492014Prove it
>>4492015Facts and logic
>>4492014But muh film sims!!
>>4491989Wow that's pretty good lol. Definitely a /p/ approved camera.
contributemostly wanted to experiment with the 'natural' setting on the K10DI think I used -2 saturation, 0 contrast, +1 sharpening but I adjusted it here and thereI also played with color correction in the WB but it wasn't too greatalso, /digishit/ general bread
>>4492019Electrical tape?
>>4492020hrrmmmmm maybe, i mean that would definitely work but i want something seamless, something like the soft rubber covers that would have originally covered them
>>4492023Pour some candle wax in the ports then smooth it out with a butter knife.
use a black trash bag to cover the ports. while you're at it, you might wanna use the trash bag to cover the entire camera to make it seamless, then toss it in the bin where it belongs xDlittle pocket digitals like these suck. be a man, get an ancient relic point-and-shoot
>>4492019Silicone, neoprene, TPU... take your pick. Buy a small sheet from Amazon and cut to fit. If there's room on the housing you can attach them with a couple of small screws and a backing plate to keep them flat.
1/?This is the review of an OM-5 micro 4/3 camera. I am a full frame user, and I bought this camera to have a small, fun, attractive camera to take snapshits around town. I own or have owned a D850, Z5ii, Z6ii, basically every Nikon DXXX DSLR, D500, Z50, etc. This is my first M43 camera and I was not sure what to expect, so I am chronicling my impressions both for myself, and for other photographers who are looking for a small, fun camera. Ergonomics: This camera is outstanding IMO. For me the Nikon FF cameras are in this weird middle spot that is ergonomically uncomfortable for me. They are either too small or too big. The D850 and my D7500 fit my hand fantastically. I will always have a Nikon DSLR because they are so comfortable to hold and use. The OM-5 is smaller to hold than my Z5ii for example, and that gets it out of the uncomfortable middle ground. With the Z5, I’m always between holding it in front with all of my fingers, or just 3 – there isn’t really enough room for all 4, but with 3, it feels a little insecure. With the OM-5, three fingers fit perfectly. There is enough grip on the front and a great thumb rest on the back. The buttons are very well placed on the camera body for operation while shooting. Simply put, this is a very comfortable camera to hold and shoot. For reference, when I am walking around and shooting, I grip the camera the entire time in my right hand, and have a wrist lanyard for safety. This can be fatiguing with a larger DSLR (the D800 in particular had almost no thumb rest and it was agonizing to carry. The D850 is much better, but is just heavy and gets tiring on the wrist after several hours). The D7500 is extremely comfortable in this regard because of its blobmera shape and light weight. The Z series FF cameras are in the middle ground of just “ok”. The OM-5 was very good.TO BE CONTINUED
>>4486725ap talking shit same 15.1MB raw except 4:3 picture ratio plus SILENT
>>4486725attemp take pic camera makes no sound nothing sees on screen
>>4486789not like paris throw those boots
>>4491481>muh equivalenceShut the fuck up cANON, everyone knows you're a videofag from the magic lantern bullshit. It's self evident that you became obsessed with speedboosters and teleconverters at some point like all videofags so all you now know is muh equivalence even if it doesn't hold water. kys
>>4492049>Meds, the chronicles
Film photography is better due to low sensitivity in dark areas. No one needs to see what is in dark areas most of the time. Just imagine this photo with unnecessary crap in shadows.
>>4469575>Film photography is better due to low sensitivity in dark areasdigital kicks the shit out of film for low light capture . try again retard.
>>4485559Try what? You both said the same thing.
>>4485559Yeah OP is claiming the lack of shadow detail is good because we normally wouldnt be able to see that much (in well lit scene) so it reflects realtiy in that we tend to ignore less obvious visual information.Anyway learn to read, you ESL Bangladeshi.
>>4485702This
Film photos are just pleasing to look at. You can tell when a photo is taken on film.
Should industry switch back to film for better skin tones?
yeshttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KCjMZMxNr-0
>>4477515what do you mean
>>4474517Bright headlight so it looks like a poor snuff film. More and more popular these days
>>4485017Ouch
>porn thread>ctrl-f>jew>0 results>ctrl-f>kike>0 results
I'm just a forester with an OM-D E-M10 Mk IV, who like to take photos when I'm out in the field. Clearly I'm not a great photographer, but I do have fun.Lens is a TTArtisan 17mm F1.4
Of course I took this photo right before I spooked all of the ducks.
Last one.Next set of photos will probably be after I get a UV and polarizer in the mail for this lens, or after I find time to go out to cliff with a hell of a view I know of. (lots of people know about it, but it isn't officially a designated recreation area...probably because if you slip you will die, or be left in a state where you regret living)
>>4491344>I'm just a forester with an OM-D E-M10 Mk IVNo you're not just a forester, anon. You are also a gigantic faggot and a victim for buying into the OM system
>>4491999Show us on the doll. Where did Robin Wong touch you?
>>4492010>wong touchKek.
Random photos you took at night
should've gotten her facing toward me
>>4473836
So is everyone using Lightroom or what? I already have Affinity 2 and would like something with a permanent license for library as well.
>>4462455>be me>trying out alternatives to RawTherapee>download and install darktable>run it>it immediately crashes>kill the process in task manager and uninstall it>download lightroom classic>log into my photo editing software>mfw>read the data collection notification>notice I will also be installing Adobe CC and I have no choice otherwise>yeet that shit off my computer instead of installing it>look at capture one website>download free trialComment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>4481359least retarded rawtheraPEE user
>>4462455>>4462461>>4462464>>4464562what's the current meta on pirating lightroom for windows?do i have to use one of the versions from 10 years ago, or can i get one of the recent ones without downloading ransomware?
>>4480572Your schizophernia is reaching unfathomable levels.
>>4462485>LuminarNeo is shit, I used it for like 10min on my tablet. Luminar4 and Aurora on my Mac are bloody brilliant
Sup /p/? I am publishing a zine of anonymous confessions. I'm looking for photo submissions under the theme: confession. Any style. Interpretation entirely up to you.If selected, I will immediately send you a very nice, very large print of your work, as well as a free copy of the publication once it is released.Print will be on Moab 300gsm, 100% cotton rag, matte-finish, archival, art paper.Submit photos at:https://confesszine.com/confessionOr email:info@confesszine.compic related: it's my print shop
>>4487680>but back in the day you could pick up any package as long as you knew the name on it.Duluth?
>time to confess fellow anons>send me your address >link me to your cloud storage>totally not a fedI have a confession for you, my frog folder takes up more storage than my photos.
>>4487691Screenshot your frog folder with how many pictures are in it and submit that. Seems like a great confession to me. Imagine a huge print in your room of that. wowza!
>>4487704made me lol
So this shit not happening?
Does anyone use GIMP for photo editing and manipulation? Has it become a "photographer's program" yet, or is it still clunky and freetarded?
At this point Lightroom/PS combo is the only thing stopping me from ditching Windows. I'd love to see an actually good alternative that does everything those two apps do, but there isn't one.
I use Darktable for editing jpg:s also.
>>4488079It's a good tool overall, but it can't do compositing and layering well or at all. For my product photography, I need both.
>>4485372after learning how to use dt, I don't even like LR and C1 anymoreI could use LR for free because of my work but I don't want all that bloat and bs associated with it
I used GIMP for many years but now I got a job & able to buy Ps & LrC.Bye Bye GIMP!
Why has the world abandoned photo shoots of good looking women?99% of anything I see now is selfies and if its a photoshoot its just to sell clothing or some super generic looking agency testshoot. 10 years ago or whatever the world was full of every good looking girl doing multiple photoshoots just for content. What happened?
>>4481289Because Fauci and Blden wants women and men to not be attracted to each other anymore unless it’s to politicians or billionaires And 80% women are so stupid they fell for it
>>4482436nothing about schwab or soros or this time?
A) You should go to this obscure site called INSTAGRAM and take a better look.B) American politics ruined everything. Both the conservatards and leftards hate women, hate their bodies and hate beauty for some weird reason.
>>4481289They got fucking boring after a while. I mean how many pictures of bitches you're not going to fuck can you look at? And for what? At some point these bitches all look the same anyway. You've got 3 or 4 facial types that make it in modeling, and then their makeup gets done 2 or 3 ways and you just get it jammed down your throat 80,000,000 times and eventually you realize you've seen enough, none of it has gotten you any closer to fucking any of them, they're all rich and you're a fucking sad bastard pulling his pud on an office chair. The whole thing is fucking boring. All of this, this whole universe and life in it, boring boring boring. It's like, fuck man. Just... Fuck.
>>4481290facts
