THE "WE'LL ACTUALLY POST PHOTOS" EDITION>thread questionwho's your biggest influence in your photography? do you have any photos that resemble their body of work?Previous thread >>4399633/fgt/ daily reminder (courtesy by anon): one stop per decade is (generally) bullshit>negative film ages better than positive>black and white better than color>slow films better than fast>storage conditions (dry/cool) matter more than years>Negative film is shot 1 or 2 stops overexposed and then PULLED in development so that you build more density in the exposure and develop less such that the fog is limited>slide/positive film is shot at box speed or overexposed and pulled.>if you home develop you can also use benzotriazole as a restrainer for the the first developer in E6 processComment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>4406174Sir, this is film general.
>>4406276My mistake. Sorry about that.
>>4404507Isn't that Isabella Rossellini?
>>4404928That's a shame. I was going to splurge on the V850 a couple years ago, but ended up getting the V600 instead.
>>4405150Sorry for the late reply. That is great that you pursued a career in aviation! Yes, these kids these days definitely did get screwed over.
>>4404490holy based
>>4404421>>4404424>>4404425>>4404426exceptional photos
>>4404424This dude>>4404425>>4404426>>4404435>>4404433Bro, these are excellent and i commend you. You got right in there, no shooting from the side lines. Keep it up.
>>4404435nice picture
>>4404306Same reason they police any public event, the more agitated monkeys you have in one place at the same time, the higher is the chance of violence occurring for some completely retarded reason.
Like how you some people are late bloomers, you may be one too in photography. Post here questions that go a step below the stupid questions thread and into amateur territory.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300Vertical Resolution300
>>4406255>>4406230>>4406198>A/AV with the way digital cameras work, Aperture priority is the most commonly used mode. You set the aperture which is super important for 2 reasons in terms of creative controlfirst, you can set the depth of field. you can decide if you want a lot of things in focus or only the subject in focus and everything else out of focus. this makes a big difference in the final image. (its not technically in focus, only one plain is in focus but it looks like its in focus) the other thing is most lenses have a "sweet spot" where they are sharpest. Usually its somewhere in the f/4-f/8 region. anything more closed than that has diffraction and anything more open will be softer with light fall off at the corners. you might take a portrait outside at f/1.8 to hide the background, but if you were say in a studio in front of a backdrop you might shoot at f/5.6 to get better sharpness. Aperture priority is also very popular because most modern cameras have a setting called "auto iso" and often only have one dial for exposure so its annoying to set both exposures at once unless you have time. with auto ISO you pick a base iso, an iso step, a max iso and a minimum shutter speed. generally, but not always, people only care about minimum shutter speed and don't care as long as the shutter is above minimum and modern full frame cameras have great ISO performance. you set the aperture, if the shutter speed the camera selects is at or above your minimum shutter speed the camera will take a photo at your base iso you set. if your camera cannot shoot at that minimum shutter speed it will raise iso until it gets an exposure that works for your shutter and aperture. if it hits your max iso you set your camera will then shoot at the aperture you picked at your max iso you picked, but at a shutter speed below your minimum shutter speed.
>>4406256>>4406255>>4406230>>4406198Finally there is M or manual mode. people generally shoot in this mode because they are new or they have some lighting issues that make it difficult for the camera's light meter to work right or they need a specific aperture AND a specific shutter speed. generally manual mode isn't the best experience for a new photographer because its slower to set, you usually only have 1 dial to set all 3 settings on cheaper cameras and all you are doing is chasing the light meter anyway. one of the wildlife/sports photographer boomers on youtube says he generally shoots either A mode with auto iso or manual mode with auto ISO depending on what he needs with his shutter speed and how the light is. high iso is bad because it degrades the image and makes the colors look like shit, but more expensive full frame cameras can get away with higher iso better and its better to have a high iso image than a blurry image due to missed focus or a slow shutter speed or no image at all. in the past sports and wildlife would have been shot in shutter mode. I would suggest either using manual mode or aperture priority. p mode is ok if you really need it. manual does not make you more of or a better photographer than A mode if all you are doing is chasing the meter
>>4406245Watch a Youtube video on the exposure triangle.
>>4406247>>4406247what about canon eos rp? i’m trying to decide between nikon z5 or eos rp but i already have a bunch of EF glass so i thought it’d be better to stay canon and it’s a hundred bucks cheaper
>>4406284the EOS RP is a mirrorless canon 6d with a smaller battery, it's a very noisy sensoryou should probably continue to ask in /gear/ or /sqt/ instead of giving a zach thread attention. zach himself is literally mentally disabled and lives under the stairs in his elderly parents house and can not answer any questions in any capacity.
most conscious moments
>>4405016really pretentious tbpqh
>>4405316>he doesn't know "golden hour" is when the divinity in light shines through
>>4405016It starts with "when" but never follows up with anything. When you're lonely and the lighting looks like this.... What? What about that? Why is the post not "I'm lonely and this is the lighting right now"?
>>4406050Zoomers experience high enough levels of anxiety, depression, and lgbt disorder to just get what comes after the "when" (mix of dread, emptiness, cocklust, and trump ptsd)
>>4405016[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera ModelIN2019Equipment MakeOnePlusSensing MethodUnknownFocal Length (35mm Equiv)0 mmMaximum Lens Aperturef/1.7Image-Specific Properties:Image Width4000Image Height3000Image Created2025:01:03 01:37:33Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiISO Speed Rating125Exposure ProgramNot DefinedF-Numberf/1.8Focal Length4.74 mmFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryLight SourceD65Metering ModeCenter Weighted AverageScene Capture TypeStandardExposure Bias0 EVImage Height3000White BalanceAutoBrightness0 EVExposure ModeAutoImage Width4000Lens Aperturef/1.7Color Space InformationsRGBShutter Speed1/100 sec
Can somebody tell me why it's super easy to tell when a photo was taken in 2008?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:
Snapshit from 06[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon PowerShot A75Maximum Lens Aperturef/3.5Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaLens Size5.41 - 16.22 mmFirmware VersionFirmware Version 1.00Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution180 dpiVertical Resolution180 dpiImage Created2006:01:01 13:22:25Exposure Time1/500 secF-Numberf/7.1Lens Aperturef/7.1Exposure Bias-1/3 EVFlashNo Flash, AutoFocal Length9.41 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width2048Image Height1536RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualScene Capture TypeStandardExposure ModeProgramFocus TypeAutoMetering ModeCenter-WeightedISO Speed Rating200SharpnessNormalSaturationNormalContrastNormalShooting ModeManualImage SizeLargeFocus ModeSingleDrive ModeSingleFlash ModeRed-Eye Reduction (Auto)Compression SettingSuperfineMacro ModeNormalSubject Distance2.520 mWhite BalanceUnknownExposure Compensation2Sensor ISO Speed192Image Number103-0329
>>4405496>Chromatic aberrationDigicams were made for dirt cheap, so lenses there aren't perfect. They wouldn't use aspheric glass, but also they didn't have plastics and molds to make aspheric lenses out of plastic. Or maybe they did but didn't use it for that purpose, who knows. Due to size and cost constraints, you can't just put in more normal spherical elements to correct the aberrations. >SharpnessExact same story. >NoiseSensors they used back then were much more noisy. >Image sizeThey didn't have 50 MP sensors you have in your phone right now. It was 2~14 MP.
>>4405496>>4406207Another one is sensor bloom. Around captured bright sources of light there are soft halos that appear in the final image. Sort of like a black mist filter, but not quite the same. CCD sensors (which were used in most older point and shoots) have this inherent bloom effect because of spillover. CMOS sensors do not, since the pixels are independently processed.
Technology has its stages.
I think it is sorta cool that a lot of photos from that era have this particular look. Not something I want today obviously, but cool nonetheless. Noisy flash photos was a thing as well while the subsequent cell phone era had none of that. Photos weren't taken to be posted on social media either so the thought process in taking a photo was a completely different one. Often they have a innocent randomness to them and as an elderly millennial it feels strange having lived through all of it and being familiar with those scenes because it makes it seem so distant.We still shit on digishitters, but truth is that the latest generation of them is rather remarkable and the technological progression hasn't gotten much appreciation, undeservedly so because it has been a very slow and gradual process.
It's your twice weekly gear thread! The most active discussions on /p/ right here!I'm currently in the market for a new macro focusing rail, my current one is just a cheapo off amazon you need to loosen to adjust.I see Sirui making decent items all around, and they make a focusing rail for less than $120 but I wouldn't mind some input from other anons.
>>4406111>shelf for a LENS CAPHey, I use mine as a shutter. It's an important piece of equipment.
I guess this is the best place to ask this. canon has the EF and EF-S as well as the RF and RF-S, snoy has an equivalent, pentax has pentax 67 to 645 adaptors and people in general put medium format film lenses on medium format digital and full frame digital cameras or full frame lenses on micro four thirds camerasis there an optical disadvantage to putting a full frame lens on a crop sensor, or any lens with an image circle bigger than the sensor onto that camera? is there an optical advantage to an APS-C lens on an APS-C camera over the full frame lens? there were people on canon's site's forum saying the only difference is that since crop sensors are smaller crop lenses can be smaller, lighter and cheaper. I was very slightly contemplating putting a pentax 67 lens on a pentax 645 since there is an OEM adaptor, but I probably won't regardless because the only pentax 67 lens that is faster than f/2.8 is the 105mm f/2.4 and the bokeh on that lens makes me want to puke its so ugly[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop 21.1 (Windows)Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2020:03:17 13:32:19Color Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width792Image Height858
>>4406233The big image circle can cause reflections in poorly designed cameras (uncommon) and adapters (somewhat common)Larger format lenses may appear optically worse when used with the smaller pixel pitch of crop sensors, gaining entirely new aberrations FF users never saw before and never cared about (this is why snoy lenses are so big, to keep up with the a7rv)
>>4406233It's often advantageous because edges of the frame tend to be weakest and your new edge performance just becomes the lens performance. An argument could be made for how greater pixel density in the center and midfield affects performance, but that's not super relevant in practice.If you had a lens with lots of swirly bokeh on the edges, you lose that with the cropping, but sometimes that might be beneficial to omit. At the end of the day, it's not gonna be much different than using the lens on a larger sensor and simply cropping in.
>>4406249It is relevantLenses that are ok on the edges on ff remain just ok on apsc and sometimes get even worse because the midframe sharpness falloff is magnified. It ranges from no benefit to major downgrade. You do lose vignetting tho
What's your favorite animal, /p/? Mine is the frog.Here are some snapshits from a fair I went to. My dad gave me a Sony A6400 which was really fun but I think I did something wrong with the colors so I've just gone and turned those off.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSONYCamera ModelILCE-6400Camera Softwaredarktable 4.6.1Maximum Lens Aperturef/5.6Focal Length (35mm Equiv)75 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandImage Created2024:10:21 00:46:16Exposure Time1/160 secF-Numberf/5.6Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating6400Brightness1.7 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length50.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width2995Image Height2000RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalGPS StatusMeasurement InteroperabilityGeodetic Survey DataWGS-84GPS Differential CorrectionNo Correction
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSinar Hy6Camera ModelEmotion 75Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 14.1.1 (Windows)Focal Length (35mm Equiv)5000 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2025:02:10 21:41:08Exposure Time1/60 secF-Numberf/6.4ISO Speed Rating100Lens Aperturef/6.4Focal Length50.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGB
Last one.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSinar Hy6Camera ModelEmotion 75Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 14.1.1 (Windows)Focal Length (35mm Equiv)5000 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2025:02:10 21:43:15Exposure Time1/50 secF-Numberf/8.0ISO Speed Rating100Lens Aperturef/8.0Focal Length50.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGB
snake[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
>>4405325comfy[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakePanasonicCamera ModelDC-GH5M2Camera Softwaredarktable 4.8.1Maximum Lens Aperturef/5.6Focal Length (35mm Equiv)600 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandImage Created2025:02:13 14:49:40White Point Chromaticity0.3Exposure Time1/250 secF-Numberf/7.1Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating320Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length300.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width2400Image Height1799RenderingCustomExposure ModeAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlHigh Gain UpContrastNormalSaturationHighSharpnessHardImage QualityUnknownWhite BalanceAutoFocus ModeAutoSpot ModeUnknownImage StabilizerUnknownMacro ModeNormalShooting ModeAperture PriorityAudioNoFlash Bias0.00 EV
>>4403312This is great. I maybe would have shaved off some of the right part of the pic but nice job otherwise
Any tips for graffiti or so called "street art" photography? Give me your harshest criticism.I've started taking photographs only recently and I'm mainly interested in demons, usually in urban areas. Basically anything occult or disgusting. Poverty, prostitution, drug addicts, all that sort of stuff.Other subjects such as buildings, landscapes, animals, etc, I don't find too difficult to frame although I'm still in the process of learning this new hobby.But those graffiti ones, which I find are my favourite since the subjects are mostly being drawn by schizos and vendalists, are more difficult. They always come out dirty or messy to some degree, or maybe that's just in their nature.I'll post some that were taken on Tel Aviv. I'm about to embark or a journey throughout Europe, where I'm told this phenomena is 20x worse than in here, and I want to be ready since my time over there is very limited.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSONYCamera ModelILCE-7M4PhotographerAdolf HitlerFocal Length (35mm Equiv)24 mmImage-Specific Properties:Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating100Metering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashWhite BalanceAuto
>>4406000I'm not dense, I've wrote academic papers on graffiti and variations of it, and been shooting for quite some time to know that yeah of course there's something unique to those photos blablabla (as with any photograph, actually; being unique is a characteristic of the medium, not a merit of these photos)the thing is that it'll always be derivative and will serve as nothing more than a photographic record of a moment in time of that specific wallthe light will change, the mood, the weather yadda yadda but in the end it's a shot of the graffitiit would actually be impossible to have it separated from those aspects, that's just obviousI'm not arguing some dumb shit like "oh it's not art" or anything like thatit can be art for all I care, I don't give a shitwhat I'm saying is that it's badyour contribution to the photo is pretty much null (and preferably so, so as not to interfere with what really matters: someone else's work)as I said before: I too regularly shoot graffitibut on my phone, just to show other people later or see them myself, not to LARP as an artist>woah i'm such a great photographer, look at the quality of my body of work>>4404695>>4404682>>4404683Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>4405780>>4406137I have to agree with graffiti PhD Anon, I've wondered why photographers on the artsy side of the spectrum stick to their cameras if they want to make art.Demon hunter Anon could make a collage, composite photographs or a short film if he wanted to pursue visual art. Crushing blacks and over saturating images hardly count as a take. Documentary work in itself is important and sometimes even aesthetically pleasing.
>>4406137>I've wrote academic papers on graffiti and variations of itlmfao>he's so dense he doesn't realize stating this only reveals how dense he is
>>4404682I kind of like some of these. They aren't going to win you any critical appraise but I enjoy the novelty of stuff like this. There was an anon around here that would do street telephoto work from his car with subjects like hookers in the bad parts of cities.You aren't going to get any constructive criticism from /p/ on this stuff. Unless it's building corners, leaves, or a lens test chart. The best advice I can give you is try to incorporate more story into your photos. Maybe use the graffiti as a background to a different subject....like your cats for example. Graffiti Phd anon is being really obtuse but there's a truth to what he's saying.
best tag in my town on the lowest risk abandoned box car from the 40's in the woods beside a homeless encampment
Post terrible photos that actively annoy you
>>4406024>>4406027argies look like THIS???
I never meant to annoy anyone I better get lost..
>>4405565what do you do for work zach
>>4406215I'm sorry I can't answer your question it does not relate to photography.
>>4406216that is a childish response
/compact/ v3Talk compact cameras, post pictures, etcIs that a camera in your pants or are you just happy to see me editionPrevious thread >>4396396[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiColor Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width1214Image Height1214Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>4405880maybe improved modern optics corner to corner? plus for digital high res use so modern optics can handle more details and corrections. not sure with the sensor flange distance compared to film, maybe it also has an effect.
>>4405880because they were mostly printed in 15x10s, too small to notice excessive optical effects unless you were enlargingNowadays even the potatoest of editing rigs can enlarge each individual pixel to 128px*128px squares extra sharply
>>4405888Any body that's directly compatible with vintage glass will have the same flange distance as a film camera, otherwise the lenses wouldn't be compatible, forcing you to use adapters if your flange is shorter.
>>4405880There are plenty of modern FF lenses that are just as tiny, just look at M mount.Most modern lenses are bigger for optical reasons, autofocus motors, IS, video-related features, etc.
Is he using a Fuji X100something?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1024Image Height576Scene Capture TypeStandard
How the heck is this kind of image made? She appears to be swinging her head half way through the shot.It's not just a slow shutter. Because her whole face would be blurred. I think it's probably a rolling shutter effect from a phone filter, but I want to emulate it with a DSLR.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAndroid CPH2447_15.0.0.401(EX01)Image-Specific Properties:Image Width1439Image Height1406Unique Image ID49f0b0b4-060d-4187-8ae4-66f7ff74986f
It's called slit scan photography. May this knowledge guide you on your journey into the google search results.
I have an addiction to taking photos of bees What are you addicted to photographing?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakesamsungCamera ModelSM-N985FCamera SoftwareAdobe Lightroom 7.5 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.8Focal Length (35mm Equiv)25 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2024:10:14 09:05:42Exposure Time1/240 secF-Numberf/1.8Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating50Lens Aperturef/1.8Brightness7.0 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageFlashNo FlashFocal Length7.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandard
I've taken a photo of a bee before. Not gonna lie it looks weird but the Cherry blossom tree zoomed in looks like this.
hello friends, here is a bee bee-deep in a flower[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNORITSU KOKICamera ModelEZ ControllerCamera SoftwareEZ Controller 6.11.003 (140225)Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1545Image Height1024
i don't have any of pigeons on power lines, but I have this of them checking some menus at a cafe[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeTHE DARKROOM - thedarkroom.comCamera ModelTHE DARKROOM - thedarkroom.comCamera SoftwareEZ Controller 6.60.031 (160615)Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2025:01:22 23:13:47Color Space InformationsRGBImage Width1565Image Height1037
speaking of birds, swans and a.... not swan[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSILBERSALZCamera ModelAPOLLON 14K CINE SCANNERCamera SoftwareCAPTURE ONE CULTURAL HERITAGEPhotographerUNKNOWN FILMImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiColor Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width4000Image Height2471
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS 400D DIGITALLens Size18.00 - 55.00 mmFirmware VersionFirmware 1.0.4Owner NameunknownSerial Number0730378797Lens NameEF-S18-55mm f/3.5-5.6Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2007:01:23 11:00:32Exposure Time1/500 secF-Numberf/5.6Exposure ProgramNot DefinedISO Speed Rating200Lens Aperturef/5.6Exposure Bias0 EVFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length55.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width3888Image Height2592RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoScene Capture TypeStandardFocus TypeAutoMetering ModeEvaluativeSharpnessUnknownSaturationNormalContrastNormalShooting ModeMacro/Close-UpImage SizeLargeFocus ModeOne-ShotDrive ModeSingleFlash ModeRed-Eye Reduction (Auto)Compression SettingFineMacro ModeNormalSubject Distance0.270 mWhite BalanceAutoExposure Compensation3Sensor ISO Speed188Camera Actuations-1875771184Color Matrix129
Best one I've ever used so far was Kodak Gold 200 due to the vintage look and warm colors and Ilford HP5 for contrasty street photography.Worst was Fuji 100. While the vibrance is okay, it's way too blue and green.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeXiaomiCamera ModelM2101K6GCamera SoftwareAdobe Lightroom 10.1.0 (Android)Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.9Sensing MethodNot DefinedFocal Length (35mm Equiv)25 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2025:02:08 19:18:17Exposure Time1/35 secF-Numberf/1.9Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating145Lens Aperturef/1.9Brightness-0.3 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageLight SourceD65FlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length6.04 mmColor Space InformationsRGBExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandard
>>4404966>posts photo>gets helpful advice and critique>personally attacks poster in return and demands work for freepottery
>>4404965>>4404971>PotteryYou meant poetry? The poor ESL can't even formulate a grammatically sound sentence besides parroting one-liners.
>>4404984How new are you? In fact you dont even have to tell us
Let's see, best? I like ilford fp4+, that's what I always use. Velvia 50 for colour, but keep in mind I haven't used it since it was brought back, that was ages ago... I just love looking at the 4x5 slides though.Worst: I can enjoy any film really, maybe BW400CN? I don't understand the point of it since I want to develop B&W at home not fiddle with exact temperatures and shit.
SHANGHAI GP3 NUMBAH ONE
How important are these? What happens if you don't use it?
>>4406094I stare at the sun to hyper sensitize my films, then I do a fast exposure of my films and transcribe what particle movement and/or impression I see from the photos I take in my films. Fake cameras are completely unessesary to develop your film, but sometimes if you want to take a picture of something going really fast or dangerous such as a nuclear particle a shutter may be helpful.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakesamsungCamera ModelGalaxy A25 5GCamera SoftwareS256VLUDS4BXI1Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.7Focal Length (35mm Equiv)27 mmImage-Specific Properties:Compression SchemeJPEG Compression (Thumbnail)Image Height3060Image OrientationTop, Left-HandImage Created2025:02:14 11:13:23Vertical Resolution72 dpiHorizontal Resolution72 dpiImage Width4080Lens Aperturef/1.8Exposure Bias0 EVExposure ProgramNormal ProgramColor Space InformationsRGBUnique Image IDB50ELOIR2PMImage Height3060Brightness1.4 EVWhite BalanceAutoRenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoExposure Time83/5000 secFlashNo FlashF-Numberf/1.8ISO Speed Rating125Image Width4080SaturationNormalContrastNormalSharpnessNormalFocal Length4.00 mmMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageScene Capture TypeStandardLight SourceUnknown
>>4406146>tfw it's lens inspection day and your photosis prevents you from pulling the hood back all the way
>>4406162>>4406168Love a good schizo post.
>>4406171<3
>>4406171Some men just want to watch the world learn.
It's a good day to be a M43 chad. >Compact early SLR design with weatherproofing>pen F dial for people who like taking pictures instead of gooning in lightroom for hours on end> OM-3 Kit with 12-45mm F4 Pro £1999 or £1699 for just the body>new weather sealed compact primes>perfect camera and system for pretty much any kind of photography outside of extreme low light and niche studio work (which should be using medium or large format anyways)If your not a self hating sensor size queen doesn't this seem like the perfect everyday carry? Nothing can replace film but at least for digital shooting this looks perfect for most use cases not covered by the OM-2 Mark ii.
>>4406084>olympus>actually doing this rightlol, olympus does not have enough money for an aperture ring, they literally reused parts to make thisthe jpeg settings dial doesn't even load any presets of note (ie: film sims), it looks like the crappy "creative" filters that went on every PNS
>>4406120>the jpeg settings dial doesn't even load any presets of note (ie: film sims), it looks like thepresets are just creative filters, stop intoxicating yourself.
>>4406123>well uhm film sims are just presetsthey are better presets with more powerful controls. olympus color science is bad, olympus sooc jpegs are bad and oversharpened/phone like, and their presets are even less worth using and so limited even snoy picture profiles can be bettera fuji xm5 is $800 ($1000 less) and takes better jpegs than this gimmick machine for computer nerds who know what a bs-acked sensor is
>>4403718>went full retro to delete the existing gripthey're completely missing the point. There's no demand for "retro" om-system camera when om-system as a brand has no heritage. Unless they can actually get the olympus brand there's no point. No one's going to drool over this.
>>4406170>implying the retro camera craze is rooted in actual heritage and not vibes