God this photo by Pedro Martinelli makes me feel things you wouldn't believe. Ah, the open twisted road, cool breeze, bike, sun intensely shinning after a strong rain and thus giving the whole atmosphere a mysterious aura. You can see nothing but the road, you want to drive away from all of the shit, there is only road, all else is black. >"I licked my finger and stuck it in the air. The wind was coming from the south. From the same direction my life was heading."-anon on /lit/, post No.24705860God I love photography so damn much. There is a whole damn novel in this photo.
>>4471657i think it would be better in color with more light
>>4473388What composition was used for this photo?
>>4479826I'm gonna search up Pedro.
>>4471677>"They could be here"
>>4479936Thank you for supporting 4chan
photos of my cat Rupert that i took on my phone which at least trace amounts of thoughtful composition, as per the board rules I like this shot because it really focuses on his face, which is cute
>>4476309nice cat
>>4479994>>4479996Thanks, I liked moving random sliders back then.
Nowadays I don't do much editing.
Like them fine without it.
>>4480114Tickles my brain just right
I'm killing another gear thread to get some advice on editing. I think I'm getting better at framing (?lol) but I'm colour retarded. Here are some samples of the last snapshits during my holidays so fags can re-edit them and snuggly post a better version of them while I try to understand why I'm retarded
>>4480121Everything is shot on lomo400 (shit film) and developed and scanned by a random (shit) lab hence the quality.>Inb4 Shooting film and scanning it is pointless Yes, I also print, go take pictures.Tripfags are encouraged to use their tripcodes
>>4480121I like the color here, granted I’m not exactly a trained eye.
>>4480121Not bad at all anon. Colors are nice. I would rather focus on exposure if possible.
Frankly, why bother? Might as well enjoy the flaws that come with those cheap films.
Long Portrait is Long EditionPreviously: >>4474514
>>4479863thank you ...
>>4479863WHY DO YOU LIKE THE NAME ZACH SO MUCH
>>4479863>>4480046I can't tell which autist is which anymore
>>4480134Zach doesn't speak like this >>4480046Real Zach has always been a generally calm autist
>>4480244Zach has also never been a tripfag, so I don't think thats the real one.
I'm really lost on how much sensor size matters, because while I read tons of gear stuff here and the most detailed explanations, in reality the photos taken with a small sensor still look good to me because it's about composition, feelings, emotion, subjects and things like that.So what's the deal with sensor sizes
>>4480085Are you new here or something?
>>4480086Are you?
>>4480098No. I understand entirely what is going on here. You seem confused and or suprised, which is why I ask.
>>4480100Nta. Nah you sound like a nigger anon.
>>4480101>t. Newfag
How does /p/ feel about zines?They seem fun. You print your stuff, distribute it however you want, and people look at it. They might toss it in the trash but at least you made an impression.You can make them for pretty cheap. I made some lo-fi DIY-style ones with my visual art at home using just an inkjet printer, and I've been dropping them in random places for people to find.Anyone ever make zines?
>>4447307I remember this one, wanted to buy it but you made the orders go through the mobile version only so i never got around itPretty cool tho
>>4438872I should make one, one of death and sex and birth and cannibalism.
Currently working on a film photography project I might turn into a little Zine to gift to everyone who participated as a little thank you.Problem is all the pictures are horizontal and I'll probably stick to A5 size to keep printing costs down. So I plan to fill each page with one photo but that leaves me with picking one of the following formats, which both seem a little awkward. Not to mention how I'm not really sure what I'd even do with all the negative space that I would get from putting a horizontal photo on a vertical page (which I imagine would be the most natural format)Not really sure what to do about it.
>>4479943Though haven given it a little more thought while writing the post, maybe I could do something like picrel.I'm just not good with words and don't want it to sound too pretentious, but I might have a fun artsy idea that might work out to add a small description to each image
>>4479943I think both of these would be fine, and much better than >>4479945, which would force you to awkardly rotate the booklet on every single page turn.There's plenty of horizontal layout photo books out there, so it's not like you're doing something unprecedented. And either way, making a zine is more about the fun and sharing some art, so it doesn't matter if it's not 100% quality produced with every detail.
New thread[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Pixel CompositionRGBImage OrientationTop, Left-HandColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1000Image Height667
>>4476763someday i will, at least I'm thinking about itright now i'm unemployed, so no new expensive gear for me
>>4408437insane stuff, congrats! any chance of getting a 4k wallpaper version?
Is A6 Lemmon going to be visible again in january/feb?
>>4476713good job! What's your next target?
>>4475340High ISO film struggles a lot more with satellites leaving trails.
Can UV filters help to reduce purple fringing?
>>4479555Just paste the green channel's edges into the blue and red channels.
>>4479875Clever technique but I can't do that with video without lots of manual labour. That's why I think a filter would work better in that situation.>>4479843It doesn't look so good when the edge of the subject is so purple that it overwhelms the blue channel and it eats away at the shape.
>>4479760Wratten 12 is the minus blue filter. As blocks blue (and violet) when shooting false color IR film / digital imitation. (Can't find data of 12A if it's a thing.) Wratten 2A is pale yellow UV blocking filter, 2B blocks less, 2E blocks more, both also pale yellow.For transmission curves, check https://www.kodak.com/en/motion/page/wratten-2-filters/ (Posted this before: IR mod cheap p&s, W12 filter, flip channels)
>>4479916It's a Hirsch product, not part of the Wratten scale. It lets most blue through.
>>4480017 In that case It could be a good candidate.Likely any moderatel yellow could work as long its not strong enough to block all blue but strong enough to block purple.As authotrity of being almost completely ignorant of video color editing, I'd suggest getting white balance as right as possible in camera.
Rank the Trump Portraits
>>4475438based
>>4432114I remember before the election I got banned by the cuck janny because I posted the ear shot photo with the flag as a defining photograph of 2024. Hope that faggot got doxxed and fucked off.
>>4475946Authoritarians are good and the heckin american way is dysfunctional garbage that’s already killed the country permanently and on a genetic level, but they must first be SMART authoritarians, like xi. Not orange putin.
>>44321141342 (doubt this is a portrait tho, the lighting sucks)
>>44792762 was his official portrait for the first term, and it sucks. Good thing he won again or else he would be stuck looking like that for eternity.
#1post ur clouds edition
in hindsight i shouldve took a horizontal photo
spot the bird
What's the appeal of this photo do you think that made the editor to choose it for promoting an exhibition?
>>4479832the good composition is pure chance caused by taking dozens of similar dogshit photos so that one may turn out alright. by no means an artistic choice. it's an O.K. photo but that's it. It could've been taken by an 17 year old who just went out to give street photo a shot for the first time
>>4479851The alleged Palmstranden shots that you all base this stupid theory on were actually done in Yalta.
>>4475178i like leica ms and joel meyerowitz but i cannot figure out why someone would feature this photo. there's nothing to look at
>>4475178>leicaLooks like it was taken with a cheap android phone.
>>4479851Double-cringe.
Your photo must be at least 5 years old. If you are new to photography - share the oldest you got.
>>4479998
>>4479343Didn't you just post this in an rpt?
>>4479999
>>4480002Its a fresh edit but taken in 2017
>it now cost $20 to develop film only with no prints or scansAHHHHHHHHH
>>4411869>shoot film because it's better than digital>use lab because processing at home is scary>get scans because meds ran out and the money is tight so buy film instead of mental illness pillsfilm photogs are the most retarded larpers out there. shoot film just to get digital files anyway. lol
>>4431359>and doing it in color is a huge fucking PITAhalp my art isn't a one click consoomer cattle affair.
>>4411869skill issuechemistry prices didn't change muchI develop, print and/or scan my film myself saved a shitton of money in the long runat least if you shoot quite often
>>4411869why would you shoot film when digital is free photos?
>>4479824>Shoot myself naked in the mirror every day>Have dedicated camera for this, so only naked shots of me on film>Ilford FP4, develop myself using permanganate/sulfuric acid reversal process>Cut and tape the film strips in a drawing book with bright white sheets>Copy "Sun and Steel" character by character with a black ink brush next to the strips of me.Call me when I can do this using digital, I want to live a little while I'm here
It will rain all week. How do you approach shooting outside in the rain? Do you trust the weather sealing?
>>4479955No a new one we have never seen before.
>>4479959>>4479917
>>4479961Okay, so you are not the real zach. I doubt he would have purchased a 4chan pass either. Huge fail.
>>4478109I take the D4. It will be fine.
>>4479962Well it'll have to be a later image.
This thread is dedicated to close-range photographic captures utilising macro-optical imaging configurations to achieve greater reproduction ratios. Got it? Good now upload some shit. Last thread: >>4376661
>>4479196Flash doesn't affect them
>>4479196There was a link posted here a while ago but basically, something something, it can annoy animals but it doesn't harm birds or reptiles. Spiders I imagine are also relatively not gonna give a fuck.
>>4479495>>4479496good to hearthis isnt the spider i flashbanged, a different one
>>4479505That's one cool spiderbro. I like spiders. Spiders are cool. If you kill spiders, you are not my friend. If you are my friend and you kill a spider, I will tell you that you suck and that you should never do it again. I will also give you a very angry and serious look while saying it, because I am dead serious. You can not fuck with spiders.
>>4479511based
