[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/p/ - Photography

Name
Options
Subject
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


Janitor acceptance emails will be sent out over the coming weeks. Make sure to check your spam folder!


[Advertise on 4chan]

[Catalog] [Archive]

File: IMGP1034.jpg (1.88 MB, 2304x1728)
1.88 MB JPG
>Nocturnal photography (also referred to as night photography) refers to the practice of taking photographs outdoors between dusk and dawn, when natural light is minimal or nonexistent.
>The low-light conditions night photographers work in require specialized techniques to achieve proper exposure, including long exposures—ranging from several seconds to days—higher ISO sensitivity, or artificial lighting.
>The genre encompasses a wide range of subjects, including urban and rural landscapes, architecture, industrial sites, and astrophotography.
Post your night photos!
128 replies and 80 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4510431
köttbullar
>>
>>4518401
>Köttbullar are traditional swedish meatballs.
QRD? I need an interpreter.
>>
nightfags, for what do you expose? I'm a newfag and best I came up with is point meter to the brightest thing like a lamp and overexpose by like 2 (my camera only shows scale to 2 and if you're over 2) so it's not blown, and surroundings are still dark cause I don't want a bright night photo
>>
>>4513065
Note: this is only a problem if you live in the Eastern Bloc, Detroit, downtown Nashville, New York, SoCal, Toronto, Vancouver, London, or Florida.
If you live in a civilised part of the world, then yes you can use a tripod at your discretion.
>>
File: P1091501_resize.jpg (3.44 MB, 3001x4000)
3.44 MB JPG

hai!! ive never used 4chan so im kinda a little confused on how to make posts

i thought this was a cool photograph that i had taken on a school camp and i want to show people of the public, i shot this with a panasonic lumix g7, criticism and thoughts would be nice !!
11 replies and 3 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4519211
>>4519231
>>4519233
>>4519234
It's good for a beginner because I can see you are going for a specific tone in the lighting and colors and you are using subjects to anchor the scene. So you're doing the work to get better.

Now for the pictures to get outside of the beginner realm you would need a better cohesive theme between the pictures, or something unique in the style or visual elements. You also need to work on your colors and contrasts. >>4519233
is pretty bad in this regard, the colors are unnatural, the contrasts washed out and hazy, and the whites are blowing out.
>>
>>4519211
Based West Gippsland enjoyer (I assume that's where it is anyway). First photo is your best photo, but the others are pretty alright considering you don't know much about photography.
>>
>>4519211
lmao the new tripfaggot already ratioing half of the board
>>
>choose retarded tripname
>post 3 photos
>ask for critique
>never answer
>create new gear thread
>>
>>4519231
Really like the tone and colors of this one

File: IMG_2098.jpg (24 KB, 1003x564)
24 KB JPG
lemme see your shots for the moon!
this is mine btw
captured with canon 2000d 55mm i can not remember my camera settings
i gave it some edit with lightroom this is first time with DSLR
284 replies and 139 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4518445
Nice - thanks!
>>
>>4518445
>while out camping
I sometimes wonder how many Anons go camping or have ever seen the Milky Way.
>>
I never thought that my thread would still alive all this time XD
>>
File: Moon&Venus20240805.jpg (1.26 MB, 3000x2000)
1.26 MB JPG
>>4520542
Well here's another bump. Moon and Venus, August 5, 2024 20:53 PDT.
Nikon D780, 24-120 at 120mm, ISO 400, f/8, 1/160s. Resized from 6kx4k pixels.
Moon's age: 1.59 days. Probably the thinnest crescent I've ever seen.
>>
>>4520549
>24-120 at 120mm ... f/8
Whoops no - a cheap manual-focus 500mm f/6.3 lens. (not that anyone prolly cares...)

File: 1001873251.png (239 KB, 1200x500)
239 KB PNG
what is the best action camera for travel and diving in 2026?
1 reply omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>hey /p/ what camera…
Newest sony
Canon 5DII
Upgrade your monitor
Nikon D200
Get a tripod
Pentax K10D
Phaseone IQ3 Trichromatic
Circular polarizer
Fuji S5 pro
Zenza Bronica SQ-A
Nikon FE2
The one you have with you
Capture one
Not micro four thirds

Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>
i dont know
>>
>>4515079
>action camera
>/boarding your own post when you didn't even answer OP
Moron
>>
File: IMG_4398.jpg (186 KB, 744x852)
186 KB JPG
>>4515485
>action camera
I got your action camera right here cheif
>>
>>4515079
>Not micro four thirds
why not?

File: 1782080623605118.jpg (382 KB, 1080x1080)
382 KB JPG
Okay it's been a while since we've had these so...

Let's start by posting the guy I visualize when I see a streetfag here on /p/. I'll post his work below, he really encompasses the creepy streetfag vibe. He's not unlike the freaks immortalized in Dario Argento's and Brian De Palma's classic gialli.
His work is the validation of Susan Sontag's perception of photography as a form of rape.His name is not unlike that of the psychos in the horror thriller canon. Smooth Leg Greg, not unlike Buffalo Bill, Dale Longlegs, or Leatherface.

Am I wrong in my perception? Anyways, street photography thread.
36 replies and 11 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4519987
But he's not a tranny. In fact, /fa/ trannies like MWAHnon have expressed disgust at the fact that he's a "cis gay". He's a wannabe androgynous faggot.
>>
>>4519938
He's worse than a zoophile, even the French directors he lives so much say cinephilia is a disease and a perversion.
>>
>>4520008
I assume you meant "he likes so much" and no, other than Chris Marker I'm not a big fan of the French. I much prefer Italians.
>>
>>4519977
He literally posted photography though. CDS is getting out of hand, he posts and people lose their grip on reality.
>>
This thread is now officially blessed by smooth legs Greg, as seen in the following post: >>>/fa/18748099

File: vidgen ssd.jpg (401 KB, 2218x2322)
401 KB JPG
Summer 2026 edition

All video related questions and discussion is intended for this thread. Here we discuss techniques, gear and anything else related to capturing video footage. Please don't pretend to be an expert if you don't know what you're talking about. Kindly leave your ego at the door.
Posting short films/scripts or other work you've done is encouraged.
We tend to use and recommend DSLRs/mirrorless cameras because they provide phenomenal picture quality for their price, have large sensors (ie the same size used in high-end cinema cameras, and larger) and have interchangeable lenses.
In contrast, consumer camcorders often have much smaller sensors and a fixed lens.

>STICKY - https://text.is/QZ1J
>Helpful guide, additional books and more in-depth FAQs - https://web.archive.org/web/20200926115310/https://pastebin.com/kG0gRmTZ

>NO ONE CARES WHAT AN EXPERT YOU THINK YOU ARE. IF YOU’RE ASKING BASIC-AS-SHIT QUESTIONS, YOU CAN’T BE ALL THAT GREAT. SEE ABOVE

Previous thread >>4499500

Quick FAQS

Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
98 replies and 2 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4520613
This is the way.
Use fixed NDs for maximum image quality and use ISO to adjust exposure. Stack NDs if you need Moar. A 3 stop and a 6 stop ND is usually versatile enough.

VNDs are normally trash but more convenient. Don't forget you should be using a CPL and that'll reduce light by about 1+1/2 stop.
>>
I am very nervous about buying a used camera off of eBay but it has the most reasonable prices in the used market. Are my fears warranted?
>>
File: cleanmoreclean.png (555 KB, 743x659)
555 KB PNG
>>4520642
>item isn't as described
>return for full refund
I just explained your worst case scenario. Don't buy from jeets or obvious fake scam accounts, and otherwise just pay slick attention to the photos.
Don't buy from any "THE IMAGES FORM PART OF THE DESCRIPTION" bullshit listings where they don't actually provide a description, as they're relying on you not noticing a defect or damage then being faggots about a return because you missed it in the photos.

And always remember the offical FROM JAPAN gear condition tier list
>TOP MINT
Means it's used
>MINT and NEAR MINT
Mean it's used and has noticable wear or damage but it's minor
>ALMOST MINT
Probably actual damage or light issues with optics such as heavy dust
>EXECLENT+++++
Significant damage or multiple problems

Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>
>>4520644
Thanks anon. My condition is made worse by the fact that I live in a shithole where eBay can't ship without raping me with taxes so I have to use a forwarder, but I will keep this in mind.
>>
>>4520613
i've got bags and bags of filters, but for newbies varis will get them off the ground, and anyone that has to ask is new

File: IMG_4750.jpg (287 KB, 960x1280)
287 KB JPG
It is time.
209 replies and 127 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
File: 1785337977533.jpg (1.49 MB, 2772x3683)
1.49 MB JPG
>>4520224
I don't think Ill post any more as the captcha is angering me.
>>
File: 1785337977546.jpg (961 KB, 2348x3119)
961 KB JPG
>>4520225
>>
>>4520224
>>4520225
needs more saturation
film photos look desaturated because the prints fade, not because film is low-saturation
>>
File: 8466.jpg (526 KB, 768x576)
526 KB JPG
Have a photato.

Saw the fair ground was left unlocked at 3am so drove in, kek. Woke up some carnies so only had a few seconds to get some snapshits.
>>
File: 1785592419173.jpg (4.08 MB, 3024x4032)
4.08 MB JPG

File: DJI_0002.jpg (1.15 MB, 2000x1500)
1.15 MB JPG
Theme: Clouds

All photos must be taken during the current challenge month. No old or archived shots.
Get creative and enjoy the process. Unique perspectives are encouraged!
31 replies and 22 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4517041
Awesome idea anon.

A lot of great photos in this month's challenge
>>4515824
>>4515868
>>4516259
>>4516295
>>4517041
>>4518583
>>4518842
>>4519253
>>
>>
File: _MG_7896-3.jpg (647 KB, 2000x1333)
647 KB JPG
>>
File: 007_L_e.jpg (1.36 MB, 2048x1536)
1.36 MB JPG
Clouds from above?
>>
File: DSC02016.jpg (2.41 MB, 5313x2989)
2.41 MB JPG
Fuck the thread is still up I might as well share
I tried making a pinhole lens which is why this looks so shitty

File: hq720.jpg (52 KB, 686x386)
52 KB JPG
I'll start this off, just upgraded from my aging FF to a new APS-C and I feel much more at home. Does anyone else came back to the forbidden fruit?
329 replies and 59 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4520694
Source of the image btw. It's m43 of course, given that /p is made of refugees from DPreview m43 forum.
https://www.dpreview.com/sample-galleries/3632672590/om-system-om-1-mark-ii-sample-gallery/3043540761/
>>
>>4520657
>No L-Mount pancakes
Not true actually, I checked the website and Panasonic and Leica both make at least one pancake.
>>
>>4520694
Who told you that SOOC jpegs have identical resolving power to RAW files on any camera? Just blatantly untrue.
>>
>>4520726
A camera JPEG is produced from RAW data which is discarded if in JPEG only mode.
On Pentax cameras you can press a button to save the last recorded RAW file from the buffer while in JPEG mode.
Sharpness in the RAW data is the same in either process.
>>
>>4519845


new thread >>4520738

File: IMGP0662.jpg (2.17 MB, 2304x1728)
2.17 MB JPG
Soft Edition
The aim of this thread is to discuss compact digital cameras (digishits) and share photos from them.
If your digishit has a "soft" picture mode, take some photos with it and share them in this thread. Feel free to share your digishit photos taken in any other picture mode, too.
Previous Thread: >>4477534
49 replies and 45 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
File: PICT0039(1).jpg (4.61 MB, 6024x4668)
4.61 MB JPG
Had to compress this
>>
File: dt_DSC00665.jpg (1.72 MB, 2018x2741)
1.72 MB JPG
>>
File: dt_CIMG4000.jpg (3.89 MB, 3914x2879)
3.89 MB JPG
>>
File: dt_DSCF3885_01.jpg (1.42 MB, 3456x2606)
1.42 MB JPG
>>
File: dt_CRW_1129.jpg (2.17 MB, 3933x2431)
2.17 MB JPG

File: models.jpg (218 KB, 957x802)
218 KB JPG
Where the hell do you get models these days? It used to be that you would just go on Model Mayhem or find some chick on instagram and shoot TFP but those days are over. I wouldn't even mind paying for a chick's time, but even that seems difficult these days. Not a lot of chicks into "modeling" these days, no websites dedicated to it, etc. I guess they're all doing onlyfans or something.
Any way, anyone got some tips?
11 replies omitted. Click here to view.
>>
File: sND8_2686.jpg (337 KB, 1001x1500)
337 KB JPG
Facebook model groups in your area or travel to one.

>Don't be a fucking creep models can sus that out from halfway across the country
>Don't bang the help
>Draft contracts and have them sign them it's 2026 you don't need to get MeToo'd
>Bring something to the table besides boudoir and nudes in the woods literally every guy has that in their body of work

BuT Sh0OgEr YOu'Re A FaT ReTaRd

kay I have probably shot more nude work than everyone on this board and I have more booked. If you're not even better than a fat retarded autistic truck driver I don't know what to tell you, get your game up scrub.

>>4519797

Those three are all solid advice if you're not an incel, I was the one who said this 6 months ago. OP needs to find that thread I posted a screenshot of how I do it.
>>
>>4520062
What's the contract for? I'm asking as someone who doesn't want to be a pro, but just wants to take photos.
>>
literally just get chicks through hinge. mention photography when talking hobbies and tell them they'd make a great model after they say "ohhhhh cool!!"
>>
>>4519752
Zoomer girls are a neurotic mess who think literally everything is rape. That’s why the supply has dried up.
>>
>>4520511
>everything is rape
Hot

File: IMG_6358.png (52 KB, 1280x887)
52 KB PNG
it’s so peak
the best mode for street
212 replies and 27 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4520547
Reflectance is related to flare but isn’t flare. There are plenty of lenses that are flare resistant but have a slight reflectance haze/contrast loss in normally lit scenes even when they don’t flare. Mostly tamron zooms but also a few sony GMs and kit lens tier glass.
>>
>>4520562
Again, element counts aren't any kind of substitute for actual tests for determining contrast.
>>
>>4520565
Unless its window glass shit like tamron
Or non-S nikkors
Or older shittier sony gear
Or zoom vs prime comparisons
Then it works more better
>>
>>4520568
not even then
>>
You slowly graduate from using Aperture and Shutter speed priorities and end up shooting Manual.

A handy way to remember your set up is I AM SHOOTING (I.A.S.)

ISO
Aperture
Shutter

Set your ISO first. Approximate the conditions in your head - sunny? Low ISO, overcast 400, Dark? High ISO, capturing movement? Raised ISO etc..
Aperture second. Again, approximate what you are trying to achieve in your head. Bokeh - wide, Sharpness across the shot - f/11-16 etc.
This leaves you with your shutter, which is the most sensitive part of the shot - and you can slightly adjust this up and down to the desired effect.

Soon you start to automatically approximate settings in your head and you can even abandon this system - but its a a useful go-between.

File: camera (1).jpg (274 KB, 2048x1536)
274 KB JPG
As someone who has decided to live without the distractions of a smartphone, can you recommend me 2 cameras?

>1 camera suitable for everyday carry (pic related, it's my old camera from the time before smartphones I just dug up, I want to go back to that "simpler" time), recommend me the best there is available today
>1 professional style camera, I'm considering strongly the Canon EOS R6 Mark III, not sure which lens to get, looking for a lens that is multipurpose so I can just get one initially
33 replies and 5 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4517750
To be fair that camera is really old, was not a top tier one hack when I bought it, and still the picture was sharper than the phone
>>
>oh my SCIENCE im a heckin enlightened "dumbphone" user and yes I read Jordan Peterson and Meditations
>>
>>4518318
Why does it bother you
>>
File: Realishot DC5200.jpg (294 KB, 1600x1600)
294 KB JPG
>>4517381
If you don't mind shitty quality, there are many brand new compact cameras for less than $100€ that just have a smartphone camera build in. no moving parts. just flat device. If you want optical zoom and good quality you need to spend more. Back then you had to pay a decent price $200E to get decent quality too. Inflation adjusted maybe $400€ today.
>>
>>4518340
He’s malding because hasidic jews and the kids of tech billionaires don’t use smartphones. They do not get high off their own supply. Kids actually end up with permanent developmental delays from using iThings.

Phones are THE goyslop and everything about them is why we’re fucked. Once you get into the master class of society nobody uses them except when absolutely necessary.

Smoking a bowl of pot every day is better for you than using a smartphone. Yes, it’s that bad.

File: 97065645434233213.jpg (2.73 MB, 6000x4000)
2.73 MB JPG
2 replies and 1 image omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4512395
Yup, up 5ish, usually go for morning walk around 6ish. Love seeing the sunrise, and how the light changes all around.
>>
>>4513250
fpbp
>>
No exposure bracketing, OP?
>>
>>4514799
why?
>>
>>4520492
Nta, but he asked because your sky is exposed nicely and your foreground (60% of your image) is simply underexposed.
Don't get me wrong, it's not *that* bad because dark things should look dark, but even a mild bracket of 1 stop would have made the foreground actually viewable.

File: Red-dot.jpg (87 KB, 508x1376)
87 KB JPG
Why aren't you rebadgemaxxing? Don't you want to be a member of the Red Dot club?
>>
Zoomers gotta lay off with ""maxing""
>>
>>4520465
negmaxing
>>
is there even a diff. besides the branding?
>>
File: file.png (250 KB, 500x280)
250 KB PNG
>>4520480
Yeah, the price!


[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.