>it now cost $20 to develop film only with no prints or scansAHHHHHHHHH
>>4535531>Mine has a good epson v800 I can use for free good enough for meAnon, that's worse than getting a slide duplicator and using your digital camera to digitize. Flatbeds suck.
>>4535572>good enough for me>"nooooooo that's not allowed!"God you're such a whiny faggot. Do you have any actual friends? I'd be astounded.
>>4535573What I'm proposing is nearly zero cost if he already has a DSLR in America, you can get a slide duplicator for under $15.
>>4535572But it's still free...
>>4535600Free as in free beer not as in freedom. I find older film scanners to be vastly superior, even humble low res ones like the Kodak Pakon.
Anyone here is a street photographer? How do you deal with all the cringe? Because everyone gets pissy; it's cringy as hell getting in their business. I thought people would be way cooler with what we're doing.
Reminder that his photography has been reduced to pictures of the figurines he buys and then paints. He left because he peaked.
>>4534823You posted this >>4532224 and a few days later you started impersonating everyone with a tripcode to cause drama. You've been called out on this behavior before, "Clive" (your newest assumed identity). You get btfo and then proceed to make fake trips to hoping it would make someone side with you in your melty. It's been SIX (6) YEARS. https://archived.moe/p/thread/3645281/#3654682
>>4535598>actual case-study schizo cliveposter
>>4535599I only discovered it was him all along a few days ago. Always suspected it but I got good enough confirmation for once.
>>4535604Boo. Hahahahaha. Take your meds schizo
I'm gonna dump the pictures I took on my first trip to China and share my impressions along the way. Save for the snaps, I mostly shot analog with my F90x, and with my gf's mju.I'm very much open to criticism.
>>4521763Great shots, should post some in the film general
China is honestly one of my most favorite places ever visited. people are friendly, cities are clean, food is fantasticthis thread makes me want to returntop tier thread, op, thanks a lot.
>>4521772man really pulled the big camera out in chef fei like they don't tell you they have 500 restaurants all over china
>>4521869>>4521870>>4521864Nice pics, anon. I miss Beijing even though I freaked people out for being a foreigner.
>>4521789>>4521836Very nice pictures, I particularly like these two.
Does anyone have any recommendations on where to find good scans of essential photobooks? the wiki links are all dead
check archive.org
internet archive
People have mentioned it before. But the "mirror", and books annas/zlibrary stole from internet archive got this really weird compression. Even for files with comparable sizes. Someone mentioned it happens when you try to de-DRM ia books. But who knows the actual truth.
>>4521093>>4521103nope. they are like 10-20 mb files and the images are like 400 pixel compressed trash. getting decent scanned pdfs of photo books is near impossible
>>4534739>decent scanned pdfs of photo books is near impossibleIt's a combination between needing a big ass scanner due to good photobooks being big and/or needed to bust a book's spine to have a proper flat page-to-bed surface.Very few will spend 300 dollars on an obscure photobook just to destroy it in a scan that a small handful of actual people will check.
Previous Thread: >>4408437My astronomy club is doing an outreach on smart telescopes in a few more months so I decided it pick up an S30. Its been delightful so far; setup is a breeze compared to my primary rig. Think it will be a great little thing for more casual imaging. We're not in the best time of year for my FOV, but I was able to get a little time in on M5.
>>4535320they were 90 second exposuresi should also add that i upgraded from the T7 to an R7, but still using the sigma and skyguider
What app do you guys use, if any, on your phone to get a rough idea of the current positions of celestial bodies?
>>4535343Star traker - basic but looks nice.Mobile observatory quite packed with features and been using it for yearsStar walk 2 the most packed with info but i don t like the guiAll cracked. Except mobile observatory that last cracked version was from years ago. After buying the app on sale crackers craked the latest version. Now you can find the last version for free but at least i gave the dev 15€ after using his app for 8 years
>>4535343SkyMap 3.3 by Chris Marriott,l written for Windows 3.11. It's portable! And has always been vary accurate.It does have problems with comet data though. The software can lock up when a comet entry is activated and in certain configurations. Haven't figured that out quite. Example screen cap:>>4523048The table at top is a screen cap from a DOS-based BASIC program that gives a huge amount of data on every planet was written in 1983, when Pluto was still a planet).
Reminder
Can somebody please take photos of clouds with this camera? Preferably at day and dusk, ISO 100. I'm thinking about getting one, but I'm not sure. I mostly shoot clouds, and this Foveon X3 sensor attracts me with it's colors
>>4535467>only buying new cameras can solve problemsI never said this. What I said is a denser sensor boosts reach from your optics. And the cameras with denser sensors can be had for less than a telescope. You shill full frame for religious-adjacent reasons, not rational ones. >>4535468>reeeeee how dare you take snapshits with a long lens at 90km/h, I don't consent!!!!!The biggest problem there wasn't atmospheric haze, it was speed and tinted glass.
>>4535476>just make your $1000 90d a p1000 bro. crop your cropped crop for reach.
>>4535493You're already cropping to get Saturn to fill that much of the EOS RP frame in that picture you posted
>>4535499Of the composite frame I should say. There would be a lot more detail with a 90D
>>4535500There would be more detail with a 90d and the same lens, but in your hands? NoPixel pitch isn't a replacement for quality large aperture optics. They work in concert. And in terrestrial photography, you're better off getting closer and treating "reach" as access to tighter framing, not the longer distance implied by the word "reach".
alright now you have no excuse not to be using photoshop and(or) lightroom
>>4534580based!!
>>4533663>abandonwarelol no
>>4535412He ragequit already? k3k
tried it, it simply stopped working because i deleted the last photo i opened in italso it probably contains sneaky AI malware
Had a fiddle yesterday with their lightroom, indesign and photoshop variants. Was pretty decent desu and as a hobbyist, I would much rather use a free alternative than throw money at Adobe for something I use once or twice a month, if that.Previously been using pixlr as an alternative and much prefer these newer options over that.
Soft EditionThe aim of this thread is to discuss compact digital cameras (digishits) and share photos from them.If your digishit has a "soft" picture mode, take some photos with it and share them in this thread. Feel free to share your digishit photos taken in any other picture mode, too.Previous Thread: >>4477534
>>4532933Huhhttps://www.ikea.com/no/no/p/hoestagille-duftlys-i-glass-2-veker-duft-krydret-gresskar-brun-80625517/
from my truly dogshit temu cameranew digishit soon though i'm excited
olympus c5050z
Powershot a400
Canon Powershot A580my first real camera, been having alot of fun with it.
Any Nokia or 2G cellphone camera photo lover here?
>>4519716What the fuck are you talking about?This whole thread is putrid shit
Took this one with my ZTE dumbphone
>>4535301i might be cheating abit, my Nokia N900.
Dusk encounter edition
>>4535181
>>4535182unfortunate motion blur in these, shouldve had a higher shutter speed I guess
>>4535183overall I like the new body. the sigma definitely isn't the sharpest lens but the R7's better AF and smaller pixels I feel like lets me get more details on a shorter, sharper focal length.
>>4535179>>4535181>>4535182>>4535183>>4535184Damn that's really nice for your first R7 pics. Clearly better than with the T7 indeed.
>>4534851>>4534852don't neglect the reflection man you have a beautiful symmetric shot right there but you missed it :(
Newfag here, I really like shooting buildings but don't really know what to do beyond hurr durr point and shoot so any criticism or advice is appreciated.(1/15)
>>4535215Still doesn't look good or interesting in any way
>>4520781>>4535215There is literally no way to edit this photo to look good, sorry. It is some dweeb standing right underneath a shitty office building.To do the formal geometry thing would require a higher perspective and most likely a much longer lens or a perspective control lens
I get the building photo appeal. I think the big thing is asking yourself what you tried to capture and specifically what aspects you like beyond 'I think they're neat'. Atleast I think thats what I could improve on. >>4524600>>4524602>>4524634These for example, maybe a photo of a building facade, but without showing the sky, from different angles to explore an interesting pattern or texture you found. Or you could focus more on specific details and kind of 'dissect' a specific building.Here's one of mine, with nothing that I just suggested.
>>4524600>>4524602>>4524634They're not even going straight up and down
>>4535352That is an astute observation
I like editing the photos I take in Photoshop, anyone else take photos like this?1/5
>there is no photo threads on /p because critic is too harsh
>>4535294nobody here understands you can be critical without being a cockjockey about things.
>>4535295Nobody is being harsh here. And when people are harsh it's usually very justified. The reason why photo thread die is because 80% of OP never answer or engage with criticism, and posters learn it's a waste of time to write a whole ass paragraph when you won't even know whether OP read it.
>>4535298Trip on, poppet
>>4535295>>4535304>got called out for snapshitsCope and seethe
How come no one posts here?Photography is a pretty big hobby, and it has become very fashionable to shoot film in recent years, so why is this board completely abandoned?
>>4534548Imagine being in love with a fucking dog
>>4534570YOU imagine>I live it
>>4534570Put your trip back on cinefag
>>4534570Yeah you'd rather just fuck it and not love it right
It's because any thread devolves into gearfaggotry
>The Ansel Adams Publishing Rights Trust has raised concerns over what it describes as the unauthorised use of Ansel Adams’s name and work in an “AI-generated colour version” of his iconic photograph shot in 1942 Moonrise, Hernandez, New Mexico, which was recently exhibited and offered for sale at a major international photography fair.>In a statement, the Trust said the work “exploited Ansel’s name, reputation, and his most iconic image, while failing to identify any human artist responsible for its creation. The Trust did not authorise, endorse, consent to, or acquiesce in the ‘AI-generated colour version’ of ‘Moonrise, Hernandez, New Mexico’ exhibited and offered for sale by Danziger Gallery at The Photography Show presented by AIPAD in April. The Trust was not consulted or notified before the work appeared. Once alerted, we reached out to James Danziger in real time, notifying him of the Trust’s rights, and asking for the work to be removed. Correspondence shared with the Trust shows that, despite our formal notice, Mr. Danziger subsequently leveraged Ansel’s name, ‘Moonrise,’ and the AIPAD presentation while pursuing a proposed commercial AI colourisation venture involving other artists’ estates.”>James Danziger made a response on the Danziger website to Ansel Adams Trust's condemnation by not only mentioning that the image is technically in the public domain, but also wrote: "As for the print itself, while A.I. served as the starting point, the final image involved extensive human intervention, editing, proofing, and refinement over many months."
>>4535055Put who on a moral high ground?
>>4535056The ones defacing Adams' works
>>4512754ansel adams was a notorious ball gargler who loved giving head and eating cum loads while out on the trails for any walker that came back. the faggot of the paths they called him.
>>4535091Seething incel
>>4535091Damn he beat you to this
I'll start
>>4524791See, this guy here proved the point I've been making for years. Make it black and white, crush the blacks and you have art™ just like Moriyama.Street photography and the circlejerk around it have been a disgrace to photography.
>>4525457POV: you're a femanon and preparing your dog for the next phase.
