"4chan-Published" Edition.Previously: >>4460437
>>4467716fujifilm xt1, 850 nm sensor mod, capture one raw editing, bespoke colorblending. no masking or AI voodoo.
>>4467944>>4467934>>4467933>>4467930>>4467927Where? Europe?
phones are just as good editionprevious: >>4465149
>>4467812I was in same boat, bought a 5d mk2 and a 50mm 1.8 for like 200$ all in and it takes nice photos and the menus/dials etc are really easy to pick up. I will sound retarded but I was shocked that cameras really need a lot of light so if you plan on doing any night time shooting or anything in less than good light probably get a tripod. You can push the iso a bit on the 5d2 but not hugely. I also bought a $20 1990 canon slr and can use the same lense for which is nice to try out. I would also say you can typically recoup your money on this stuff if you don’t like it, if you don’t mind dealing with eBay etc.
>>4467959triangles are much less tacky
What sort of psychopath buys a camera that doesn't have a viewfinder?
Thinking of replacing my XF 10-24mm f4 when I get my X-E5I'm probably going to get a Sigma 17-40mm for the long end plus more reach but I'm not sure what to replace the wide end withMy current thinking is either>Sigma 12mm f1.4>Sigma 10-18mm f2.8>Tamrom 11-20mm f2.8Thoughts?
>>4467501>>4467504>>4467541i got itthis things fucken hilariously puny
hopeless snapshits
>>4467956I’m going to try to do a better job tomorrow.
>>4467971Please don't, you fucking imbecile
>>4467971>>4467982im not gonna be this harsh but theres literally a street photo thread active here >>4458392maybe check what other anons shoot, these are really worthless.
>>4467986please do not foist this unwashed savage upon the main thread. already the thread is dominated by anons posting only junk shots
Rainy day editionThread theme: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=phcDgM2Mazk
>>4463292
>>4463175go back with a sheet of googly eyes
>>4463004Love it>>4462971Not your best, but quite good nevertheless>>4463086Every nook and cranny in this world looks comfy with half the population if today.
>>4459972Saved for wallpaper, thanks
Hi /p/.I was attending anime con two weeks ago and I would like to dump some (primarily) stage photos and ask for suggestions on improvement. Somewhere around year ago I made similar thread and got many valuable suggestions so I figured out I could ask again. Despite trying to apply more of your advices, I feel like I did rather mediocre this year, compared to previous one, however. But I would like to hear your opinion too.I remember that photo dump threads are generally welcome here but if not, just say so. Thanks in advance for any advice. If you want, I could upload RAW files for selected photos on temporary link like catbox or something.
>>4467037>cause rendering bugsyes, im still using 4.6.1 and have found myself having to delete the xmp file because ill click to original to start over and suddenly the image is fucking orange
>I fucked up this photo>this wasn't intentional>the lighting was shitthese are all your good photos
>>4467638You mean that others I consider okay are actually worse? Im sorry, Im a bit confused.>>4467037As much as I hate to admit it, either I still cannot grasp Darktable enough or, like you said, the software itself is a bit messy. I was using 2.6 so far until it stopped recognizing half of my lenses (they were still in database and could be manually selected for lens correction but doing this every single time was annoying at best, it must be some bug) so I made separate installation/cache folder for 5.2 and basically had to re-learn the program and still encountered odd situations. To list some examples, it have now two modules for white balance, "white balance" proper (value + tint) and "color correction" which is the one user is supposed to modify as touching white balance module instead makes everything go bonkers. Unfortunately, I had to disable "color correction" module at few situations to safely modify white balance since it apparently assume that user selected proper value at the moment of shooting since if that value is too much off, "color correction" seems to behave oddly. Likewise, "filmic" module expects user to "expose to the right" during shooting but it still, at least in my opinion, leads to pretty much same results as sigmoid module (which is now on by default) - only less saturated as on pic attached and require more work (since you need to correct white balance first for neutral colors, adjust exposure for midtones, set relative white/black exposure). Unless I got something wrong but manual is still at 4.6 while software version got past 5.2 already (with developers encouraging community to write manual themselves).Even at discount, Capture One might be costly but Im afraid that I cannot run on free software all the time anyway.
I come to this thread to look at the nipple in the OP.
>>4467966...what?
Old thread. >>4452845
>>4467620Snapshots aren't photography.
>>4467628post a photo fag
>>4467599>swing camera on bird like you're trying to shoot it with a shotgun>pull the trigger repeatedlyit's simple, really...
>>4467614
>>4467752Sponsored by Yoplait™.
Anyone else here working a regular job/day job as a photographer? I've been working as a real estate photographer for a while and still do side jobs for things like corporate portraits/events, and I'm curious if anyone else on /p/ works in photography too.
>>4467708Unironically just go on Zillow and look at listings for really nice houses, not crap shacks, as agents will tend to only hire photographers for the really good listings that need to stand out. https://www.zillow.com/homedetails/11502-Keeley-Ct-Orlando-FL-32837/46143051_zpid/?imxlb=g,9Here's a pretty good example. You'll also always be doing HDR, it's a standard in real estate since people want to feel like its a well lit space, so strong shadows are a complete faux pa.
>>4467709I can pull it off. I do have formal photos of buildings exactly like these. I think I am going to straight up apply, kek.
>>4467710Yeah just go for it bro, make sure to attach some examples of your work to the application and you'll do fine. They constantly get applications from no-photos and they just trash those immediately.Oh and people skills, emphasize those. You'll be constantly talking with agents and home owners and need to be good with people.
>>4467711>need to be good with people.OOF, this is the department where I lack. But I am going to shoot my shot. Thanks anon.
>>4467720If you've ever worked in anything that involves people (even just at Wal-Mart), you're good. You don't need to be some master salesman, you just have to not be a massive autist (being slightly autistic is okay though since that is just a part of photography).
Taken on 13-09-2025, 19:59:37
with a potato ?
>Alvin Langdon Coburn recalled that the Vortographs he created in January 1917, including this one, were the “first purely abstract photographs.”>Of the tool used to create these images, Coburn wrote in his autobiography, “The instrument is composed of three mirrors fastened together in the form of a triangle, and resembling to a certain extent the Kaleidoscope—and I think many of us can remember the delight we experienced with this scientific toy. The mirrors acted as a prism splitting the image formed by the lens into segments.”>The poet Ezra Pound, who had introduced Coburn to the short-lived London-based Vorticism movement, wrote, “The tool called vortoscope was invented late in 1916. Mr. Coburn had long desired to bring cubism or vorticism into photography. Only with the invention of a suitable instrument was this possible.”
>>4467437Pointless, just use AI.
>>4467452I was stalked by a land whale because I rejected her and she spread rumors about me back in college. She has mass reported my Instagram account and is trying to get me cancelled because I have politically incorrect views. Fuck you. I have seen your kind before. >>4467455What? You're insane. I have done nothing wrong. Fuck you.
>>4467459you’re going to love what we have in store for you
>>4467459Are you Australian?
>>4467459Ill say hi next time I see you out shooting. :)
Old one reached image limit. >>4429946
solitary! sandpiper! real flighty. did not walk close.
>>4465932Try using a better lens next time.
>>4467202currently that is the best I've got, I'm too much of a poorfag for anything better at the moment
New bread >>4467818
any anon's do pet photography? I'm just starting to shift into it from doing wildlife and I'm struggling with learning how to work with artificial light and smaller spaces, I invested in a speedlight which has been a huge boon.
Porcellio werneri>>4467249Nesodillo arcangelii "shiro utsuri">>4467250Armadillidium maculatum
>>4467251....forget the picturePorcellio werneri
>>4467248>>4467249>>4467250>>4467251>>4467252coolalthough you'd probably do well with a better macro setup than upscaling
Summer of getting shit done editionAll video related questions and discussion is intended for this thread. Here we discuss techniques, gear and anything else related to capturing video footage. Please don't pretend to be an expert if you don't know what you're talking about. Kindly leave your ego at the door.Posting short films/scripts or other work you've done is encouraged.We tend to use and recommend DSLRs/mirrorless cameras because they provide phenomenal picture quality for their price, have large sensors (ie the same size used in high-end cinema cameras and higher) and have interchangeable lenses.In contrast, consumer camcorders often have much smaller sensors and a fixed lens.>STICKY - https://text.is/QZ1J>Helpful guide, additional books and more in-depth FAQs - https://web.archive.org/web/20200926115310/https://pastebin.com/kG0gRmTZ>NO ONE CARES WHAT AN EXPERT YOU THINK YOU ARE. IF YOU’RE ASKING BASIC-AS-SHIT QUESTIONS, YOU CAN’T BE ALL THAT GREAT. SEE ABOVEPrevious thread >>4433528Quick FAQSComment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>4467229Yeah, honestly I didn't do any research I just find it looks nice with that compact body and huge screen. Price is not too bad either. My Q can only do Full-HD, the lens is amazing though.
>>4467230just buy a canon r8 like the last idiot who asked for advice and then ignored all of it
Bump limit reached, new thread>>4467259>>4467259
>>4467245>"hey goyim's I have 37 EF and RF lenses and really enjoy the Canon everything. What should I get to upgrade from my T6i?">BRO GET A Z6 OR A SNOY WHOGIVESAFUCK OR JUST SHOOT YOURSELF BECAUSE CANON BAD>"... I'll get an R8">NOOOO THAT IS VERBOTENIf your advice is retarded, don't be surprised when people don't listen
For guys in the movie industry working as techs, which brands do you dress with ? I want to get proper work pants
Shameless edition.Last thread: >>4457780
>>4466847>low energy cluster-b retard can't into greentext
>>4466851>room temperature moron projectsIt went over your head, dumbo. I'm making explicit the implicit, the fact that he pulled that claim out of his cum-leaking faggot ass.
>>4466487>The majority of people who get published because they are good started out as self published artists.Self publishing wasn't a thing until comparatively recently.Also, publishing it is the easy bit, you then have to market and distribute. Good luck with that.
>>4466851>retard raised on participation trophy culture is mad at the truthYou can't handle the truth.
>>4467073>>4467173>seething for two days
Making a thread because I’ll be posting more than 5 photos.
>>4466617this one looks leaps better than >>4466615 likely due to more space>>4466619excellent either way>>4466621idk why i just dont like the first one of these this one also seems leaps better. absolutely has something to do with the framing though
>>4466765yeah i messed with it on my phonei dont like because there is to much space near the top which makes the framing look weirdother than that the majority of these are solid as fuck you got some skills OP
>>4466770it's not as balanced looking as the picture following it
>>4466760It was f8 probably Thanks anon
>>4466658probably this one the most >>4466617
Thoughts on Nobuyoshi Araki, aka ARĀKII? He is known for his evocative subjects, such as bondage and denuded eroticism, as well as controversial treatment of his models.
>>4467100*pfffft*how do I ask my barber for his haircut anyway
>>4467101
>>4467103
>>4467096This board use to suck his dick when I first came here back in 2015/16. He was the original Uncle Terry of /p/. But honestly I don't get it what he is trying to do. Yeah Sentimental Journey is a masterpiece which spawned a whole genre of confessional documentary photography. But other than that I don't get it.
>>4467119>dude what if>what if>tits lmao
