I was just wasting time on YouTube and I came across this video. How the hell are the differences so drastic between two?Why do I prefer the CCD colors? https://youtu.be/3l70liu4OjM
>>4340370>it (CCD) is unique in having its photodiodes oriented diagonally rather than horizontally and vertically as in all other DSLR cameras. This allows the use of a sophisticated interpolation system that produces an output image equivalent to 12.1 megapixels. The apparent resolution of images in this interpolated mode lies somewhere between 6.17 megapixels and the 12.1 megapixel interpolated output.Is there any truth to this?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeFUJIFILMCamera ModelFinePixS2ProCamera Softwaredarktable 4.2.0Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)75 mmMaker Note Version0130Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandImage Created2024:05:31 13:38:49Exposure Time1/2000 secF-Numberf/4.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating100Lens Aperturef/4.0Brightness9.3 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length50.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width4728Image Height3320RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessSoftSubject Distance RangeUnknownSharpnessSoftWhite BalanceAutoChroma SaturationNormalContrastNormalFlash ModeOffFocus ModeAutoSlow Synchro ModeOnPicture ModeManual ExposureContinuous/Bracketing ModeOff
>>4340694>muh boomer blob! the reds at carshows are so vibrant, that means gud colorthe phase one iq4 is literally the benchmark.weak modern cfa. why? eyeballs use a weak "cfa" (cones with overlapping sensitivity curves). that's how we see the world. through a weak CFA.strong CFAs are inaccurate and make some colors more vibrant than others, specifically colors associated with food.
>>4340701Laboratory grade tests say otherwise!
>>4340705The benchmark is a $50k phase one camera boomerEveryone prefers inaccurate film anyways
>>43407073 things. 1. I made no reference to medium format digital. 2. Todays Ektachrome with the proper filter sets the color accuracy standard. 3. I am NOT a BOOMER!
This cute gull came next to me as if he wanted to be photographed. I gave them some fries for being such a good model.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATIONCamera ModelNIKON D200Camera SoftwareNX Studio 1.6 WMaximum Lens Aperturef/2.8Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaColor Filter Array Pattern6690Focal Length (35mm Equiv)82 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2024:06:06 22:54:21Exposure Time1/30 secF-Numberf/2.8Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating1000Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length55.00 mmColor Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width3259Image Height2182RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlHigh Gain UpContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon PowerShot SX160 ISMaximum Lens Aperturef/5.6Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaLens Size5.00 - 80.00 mmFirmware VersionFirmware Version 1.00Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution180 dpiVertical Resolution180 dpiImage Created2024:07:13 09:18:30Exposure Time1/160 secF-Numberf/5.6Lens Aperturef/5.6Exposure Bias0 EVFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length60.48 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width4608Image Height3456RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoScene Capture TypeStandardFocus TypeAutoMetering ModeEvaluativeISO Speed RatingAutoSharpnessNormalSaturationNormalContrastNormalShooting ModeFull AutoImage SizeLargeFocus ModeSingleDrive ModeSingleFlash ModeOffCompression SettingFineMacro ModeNormalSubject Distance8.150 mWhite BalanceAutoExposure Compensation3Sensor ISO Speed192Image Number100-0032
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATIONCamera ModelNIKON D200Camera SoftwareNX Studio 1.6 WMaximum Lens Aperturef/2.8Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaColor Filter Array Pattern6688Focal Length (35mm Equiv)300 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2361:09:01 04:31:19Exposure Time1/320 secF-Numberf/3.5Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating100Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length200.00 mmColor Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width3872Image Height2592RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlNoneContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATIONCamera ModelNIKON D200Camera SoftwareNX Studio 1.6 WPhotographerKen RockwellMaximum Lens Aperturef/2.8Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaColor Filter Array Pattern7300Focal Length (35mm Equiv)82 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2689:02:27 12:02:01Exposure Time1/400 secF-Numberf/2.8Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating100Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length55.00 mmColor Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width3872Image Height2592RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlNoneContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessHardSubject Distance RangeUnknown
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS 90DCamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.4 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/6.2Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2024:07:21 10:53:06Exposure Time1/200 secF-Numberf/6.3Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating25600Lens Aperturef/6.3Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePartialFlashNo FlashFocal Length400.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandard
Messy bird
This is the Film General Thread, aka the /fgt/.Please post photos taken on film here, it's also ok to post about film gear here.>it's not gay to post in the /fgt/, unless you only use stand development on your B&Wsold thread >>>4335670No thread question, just a beratement you can choose to respond to or not:>stop rotating through your camera pile just to "give them some use"; it's needless self punishment that will lead to wasted film, missed opportunities, disappointing results. Instead just stick to gear that works and that you like using[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSONYCamera ModelILCE-7Camera SoftwareGIMP 2.8.14Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.0Focal Length (35mm Equiv)0 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution350 dpiVertical Resolution350 dpiImage Created2016:11:02 12:11:08Exposure Time1.6 secF-Numberf/0.0Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating100Brightness-6.2 EVExposure Bias-1 EVMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageLight SourceCloudy WeatherFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length0.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1000Image Height1000RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandardContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormal
is there a good fixer for b&w that comes in concentrate like rodinal and doesnt require very high concentration to work?I had a few months break from developing and my half used fixer mixed from powder is full of sliver flakes, i think with my schedule i need something i can only mix as needed
>>4340805Considering this stuff is like 50 years old, yeah, he's right. It's quite good
>>4340805Better than the photo you posted, cunt.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNORITSU KOKICamera ModelEZ ControllerCamera SoftwareAdobe Lightroom 9.4.2 (Android)Image-Specific Properties:Image Created2024:07:16 16:57:13Color Space InformationsRGB
>>4340858adofix plus can be used at 1+9 if that's enough
What's the preferred way to film road trips? Go Pro or should I just mount my mirror-less camera and try to film with it?
>>4340481Well you gave no parameters for answering the question. Ask a stupid question, get a stupid answer. The preferred way would be to be use an arri alexa. Next time ask a less retarded question and give some specifics about what you're looking for.
>>4340481i used an insta360 that could run off usb power, yeah. only issue i could see would be storage if it's a long trip, that 5.7k footage chews through space quickly.
>>4340486Read the second sentence in my post you ADHD numbnuts
>>4340486Faggot.
>>4340477kek
Thoughts on the f100? I've been tempted lately because of the Nikon 24-85mm f/2.8-4 D. It seems like it could be my perfect single lens setup and after shooting with a fully manual film camera for awhile, I really want to go back to something that shoots more like a modern camera but I didn't want the bulk of the f5
>>4340542You’re responding to our resident autist.
>>4340511Then why is it only the F80's viewfinder that I don't have the "skill" to use?
i didnt like the 24-85mm f/2.8-4 D, it was just too soft and missed focus often, bought a 17-55mm f/2.8 DX AF-S G instead and i like it very much
>>4340638That's for crop sensors only. Won't work on film.
>>4340639oh yes true, well you could have some cool circular vignetting
I spent years buying digital camera gear and shooting digital only to realize that film actually does look better. Well time to start all over again.Whats a good film camera thats manual, and around the 80s-90s era? I also want something non mirrorless/dslr feeling as I just feel sick with regret any time I touch something like that now.
>>4340389>What I think is the best approach is to find some lenses you really like and buy a body that works with those lenses, it makes it a lot less overwhelmingThat's the way indeed. The best handling film cameras I've had were all Nikons (they make the best bodies, who are we kidding) but because most of my stuff was Canon I went with them for my film body.It's no secret that if Canon weren't the shallowest, widest DSLR mount and the most hackable bodies for video no one would bother with them when Nikon exists.
>>4337616>where?Here you go, "sis".https://offerup.com/item/detail/207d28c5-331c-312e-94a9-da321c932ede
>>4340496IWNBAW and also, I will most likely NOT be traveling to the "great" state of illinois to buy a camera off a tranny. that being said thank you for the help anon :)
>>4340516>I will most likely NOT be traveling to the "great" state of illinois to buy a camera off a trannyXir ships for only $7.99, friend.
>>4340522I... I almost want to buy the tranny camerait must be cursed, right? Also>posted 1 year agokek.
Has anyone got any experience making zines or photo-books? I'd like to see them if you have. I'm thinking about compiling some 35mm travel photos into a nice small photo book to give to my girlfriend for christmas, I think it would be a good creative learning process, and I've always wanted to print my pictures, plus it would make a sweet gift for her. tl;dr post your zines or photo books ITT[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSamsung TechwinCamera Model<VLUU L730 / Samsung L730>Camera Software709291Maximum Lens Aperturef/3.0Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)38 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution96 dpiVertical Resolution96 dpiImage Created2008:08:21 23:37:06Exposure Time1/45 secF-Numberf/3.0Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating100Lens Aperturef/3.0Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, AutoFocal Length6.30 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width3072Image Height2304Exposure Index1Exposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormal
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationRight-Hand, TopHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2023:11:23 18:13:06Exposure Time1/60 secF-Numberf/1.8Lens Aperturef/1.8Brightness0.9 EVExposure Bias0 EVFocal Length6.86 mmColor Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width4032Image Height3024Exposure ModeAutoScene Capture TypeStandardTime (UTC)07:13:06Date (UTC)2023:11:23
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2023:11:23 18:12:16Exposure Time1/60 secF-Numberf/1.8Lens Aperturef/1.8Brightness1.0 EVExposure Bias0 EVFocal Length6.86 mmColor Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width4032Image Height3024Exposure ModeAutoScene Capture TypeStandardTime (UTC)07:11:51Date (UTC)2023:11:23
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationRight-Hand, TopHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2023:11:23 18:12:42Exposure Time1/61 secF-Numberf/1.8Lens Aperturef/1.8Brightness1.3 EVExposure Bias-0.8 EVFocal Length6.86 mmColor Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width4032Image Height3024Exposure ModeAutoScene Capture TypeStandardTime (UTC)07:12:42Date (UTC)2023:11:23
>>4340217Wow, that's an impressive looking book. Looks professional and clean, but understated in a good way. I'll check the site out, cheers
>>4340217The shots are sick too by the way
Why is no one else currently building a digital rangefinder camera? I mean, I get that the whole "insignificant niche" argument worked 10 years ago. But since cameras as a whole have become an insignificant niche, why not give people what they want? Because I'm pretty sure many people want a Leica but can't afford it. Just look at how popular the meme camera X100 has become - isn't it time for someone to capitalize on that?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
>>4330475>But since cameras as a whole have become an insignificant nicheBecause marketing to a niche of a niche isn't a workable business strategy.
>>4332706what fucking kind of acronym is ORF? not a single person ever says that you autist>500+ rolls over 3 years through my M2 and no CLA yet
>>4334037No rangefinder tho
>>4334037it's a viewfinder camera with an LCD HUD overlay
>>4332389>>4331333>>4332275I'd rather a camera that takes disposable AA's only over some phone charger shit
Quick question before I impulse buy a L39 lens off of Yahoo Auctions:Nikkor HC 5cm f2 or Topcor-S 5cm f2?I am looking for something to replace the Canon 1.8 kit lens that came with my camera - are these even worthy upgrades or just lateral moves?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image Width2087Image Height2390
>>4334999the topcor-s is a traditional symmetrical 6 element in FOUR group double-gauss style like a zeiss biotar except with 10 aperture blades, the nikkor-h is a 6 element in THREE groups sonnar style designed by bertele of zeiss again with 10 aperture blades... sonnars are essentially telephoto on the front half because of their asymmetry... makes them hard to design for wide angles... gets amazing contrast/rendering at the cost of some sharpness/focus shifting. if you get the topcor it would be more of a lateral move from the canon 1.8, not everyone likes the sonnar wild backgrounds but if you do then the contrast increase would be an upgrade if you do B/W.(nikkor on top, topcon v1 and v2 below)
>>4339262essentially it comes down to the air-gaps between elements and groups causing reflections/flares and light loss... topcor realized this and changed their rear groups to go from 3 to 2 gaps.>>4335337i believe all of the 5cm f2 nikkors have the close focusing
>>4335002You're not my mum
>>4339263>>4335337ok i looked it up and all the L39/LTM versions have it, strange as neither the leica iii or nikon s can support rangefinding that close
>>4334999N I C C AICCA
Hey /p/ I have no idea what the fuck I'm doing I just have a lot of money and I bought a camera and some gear becuase I felt like it.What did I do wrong /p/?
>>4336814New w/ a DJI ronin gimbal.>What don't you like about it? It's not a prime lens and the aperture is small>f18 1/13s duly noted[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS R5Lens Size14.00 - 35.00 mmFirmware VersionFirmware Version 2.0.0Lens NameRF14-35mm F4 L IS USMImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2024:05:20 19:16:50Exposure Time1/25 secF-Numberf/4.0Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramLens Aperturef/4.0Exposure Bias0 EVFlashNo FlashFocal Length19.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width8192Image Height5464RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoScene Capture TypeStandardFocus TypeAutoMetering ModeEvaluativeISO Speed RatingAutoSharpnessUnknownSaturationNormalContrastNormalShooting ModeUnknownImage SizeLargeFocus ModeAI FocusDrive ModeSingleFlash ModeOffCompression SettingFineMacro ModeNormalWhite BalanceAutoExposure Compensation3Sensor ISO Speed384Color Matrix135
>>4336875You went all out my guy, enjoy it, you'll not outgrow that body till it breaks so don't chase the gear.In regards to the aperture side of things, yes the higher the aperture more of the DOF will be in focus, but there's diminishing returns. F8/f10 is really as high as you want to push it, and F4 isn't that small of an aperture, won't be a low light monster, but it's still good, you can get creamy backgrounds even at f8/f9 if you space your distance between your subject and the distance to what's behind them.Here's an example I took today of F8 at 400mm at almost minimum focus distance.Before buying any other lenses, besides maybe a cheap rf50mm 1.8f, work on learning and understanding your existing kit.Don't worry about getting the lowest shutter speed possible, both the r5 and the r6mkii(what I have) are still good up to 25,600 iso. Even though you have IBIS and IS in the lens, the blur from movement is apparent at low shutterspeeds unless you're on a tripod. 1/640 to 1/800 will work well and limit that a lot more.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS R6m2Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.4 (Windows)Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2024:07:13 12:18:21Exposure Time1/800 secF-Numberf/8.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating1000Lens Aperturef/8.0Exposure Bias0.7 EVMetering ModePartialFocal Length400.00 mmColor Space InformationUncalibrated
>>4336892[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS R5Lens Size14.00 - 35.00 mmFirmware VersionFirmware Version 2.0.0Lens NameRF14-35mm F4 L IS USMImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2024:07:18 20:03:15Exposure Time20 secF-Numberf/22.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating100Lens Aperturef/22.6Exposure Bias0 EVFlashNo FlashFocal Length17.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width8192Image Height5464RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualScene Capture TypeStandardExposure ModeManualFocus TypeAutoMetering ModeSpotSharpnessUnknownSaturationNormalContrastNormalShooting ModeManualImage SizeLargeFocus ModeManualDrive ModeSingleFlash ModeOffCompression SettingFineMacro ModeNormalWhite BalanceAutoExposure Compensation3Sensor ISO Speed160Color Matrix136
>>4339732[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS R5Lens Size14.00 - 35.00 mmFirmware VersionFirmware Version 2.0.0Lens NameRF14-35mm F4 L IS USMImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2024:05:21 22:30:51Exposure Time1/50 secF-Numberf/4.0Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramLens Aperturef/4.0Exposure Bias0 EVFlashNo FlashFocal Length35.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width8192Image Height5464RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoScene Capture TypeStandardFocus TypeAutoMetering ModeEvaluativeISO Speed RatingAutoSharpnessUnknownSaturationNormalContrastNormalShooting ModeUnknownImage SizeLargeFocus ModeAI FocusDrive ModeSingleFlash ModeOffCompression SettingFineMacro ModeNormalWhite BalanceAutoExposure Compensation3Sensor ISO Speed384Color Matrix135
>>4336875Primes have better overall IQ but are rather limiting. They'll make you a better photographer if you force yourself to use them, but that doesn't mean your zoom is bad.>Aperture is smallDo you mean the widest it can go is too small? F/4 is alright. Definitely not groundbreakingly large, but should be sufficent for anything up to and including portraits. From the EXIF of >>4339732, the most straightforward advice would be to avoid f/ stops higher than f/11 ideally sitting between f5.6>8 for most things; f/22 is ungodly high and should basically never be used.Night photography is a bit of a bitch, but don't be afraid to bump your ISO up. Even my R50 can do 3200 ISO comfortably, and I would wager the R5 you have can do at least a stop or two higher with minimal drop in IQ. This particular shot could have come out much nicer at f/8, 800 ISO and maybe like 2". I'm spitballing numbers but you get the idea.At this stage I would just start getting a grasp of the exposure triangle and taking more and more practice shots. Vary your settings while still achieving the same exposure level of the same scene then review them later to see the differences. It might also be a good time to explore different kinds of photography like Astrophotography or Landscapes.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeOLYMPUS IMAGING CORP.Camera ModelE-PL7Camera SoftwareVersion 1.4Maximum Lens Aperturef/3.5Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution350 dpiVertical Resolution350 dpiImage Created2024:07:11 04:02:26Exposure Time1/4 secF-Numberf/5.3Exposure ProgramCreativeISO Speed Rating200Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length37.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width4608Image Height3072RenderingCustomExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlLow Gain UpContrastNormalSaturationLowSharpnessNormal
How can you cope with the fact that photography is always inherently limited by the current world.If the images that you've dreamed of can't exist, if you can't find beauty in the current world, then what use or joy is there in photography.
>>4340101Have you used a Tiffen 812?
Based dogposting[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNORITSU KOKICamera ModelEZ ControllerCamera SoftwareEZ Controller 7.40.010 (210714)Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2024:07:16 17:15:56Color Space InformationsRGBImage Width3089Image Height2048
>>4340101I'd shoot film if Kodachrome was still available.
>>4340128the bloom look isnt really my thing, its more subject matter than optics. >>4340131i hear its like 50$ in today money per roll. Like imagine an option more expensive than the price of slide film.
>>4339652u have been filtered by lack of true artist brain and depression. u can take beautiful pictures of things u find ugly. there is beauty everywhere.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution216 dpiVertical Resolution216 dpiImage Width1050Image Height1571
>>4340203I like this one
>>4340211I am a huge retard I'm sorry I just wanted to reply. Probably killed a gearfag thread anyway
Sony a7RIIISony a7RIVSony a7SIIISony a9IIICanon EOS R6iiCanon EOS R8Canon EOS R7Panasonic Lumix S5mk2Panasonic Lumix S5mk2X
>>4338523Canon has excellent IBIS. Much better than Sony's.
>>4338523Why is this post wrong in every wayTypical panasonic person
>>4338553The guy claims snoy has better AF than Canon, kek.
Canon makes the best cameras on earth periodIf canon doesnt have it you probably dont need it, stop being autistic
>>4338557cannot's af is 4th best nowSnoy > Niggon/Panasoynic > Cannot > jipOM > Wormji
I sold all my gear except one body and two lenses. I rarely take my camera out anymore except if I'm already doing something else interesting. I don't go out with the intent to take photos, I go out and bring my camera just in case there is a photo worth taking. I no longer stress if I see a potential shot while I'm driving because I don't need to get every photo, I just appreciate the moment instead. I focus on more compact and lightweight gear. All my lenses are cheap, floating aperture zooms now. I don't have GAS, I don't follow any review channels anymore. I can't imagine why I'd ever buy a new body or lens outside of damage. I am no longer 'a photographer', photography is just something I do as apart of my life. Miss a shot? Doesn't matter, miss focus? Doesn't matter. They're just going on instagram my guy, relax. No one actually gives a shit.
>>4340120It's not a larp, it is just my life
I have a Nikon FG, along with Series E lenses for it. A nice, small, lightweight and compact take anywhere camera with a small waist pack to match.It's not my only camera, but it is currently my most useful film camera.
>4340126Thats why you posted a frog instead of a photo
Why would I bother posting photos here?
>>4340142so the frens can enjoy them :^)
don't get me wrong, i think there are some truly beautiful photos out there--"street" photos i mean specifically, i guess, but what im about to say transcends that and can be extrapolated to the world of fashion photography and whatever else photography (in those contexts, everything im about to say is probably even more relevant LOL). I even took a lot of photos on a film camera years ago of random shit (some of it even published). But something ive noticed after observing “photographers” online (see picrel): These HAVE to be some of the most lamebrained, least artistically gifted people who claim to have an artistic gift. Watching picrel’s channel they (besides maybe daniel arnold, but even him) are just some of the most vapid, shallow people imaginable taking photos of le 'interesting' and 'unexpected' instance of 'happenstance'. The artists themselves seem extremely shallow and talentless, and therefore the shit they take is incredibly shallow and its meaning so obvious, so unavoidable. At best, they’re trying to recreate le Gary winogrand or whomever. Anyways, know this is the photography board of 4chan, but I figured I would find some likeminded folks here rather than poasting on reddit where they’d just downvote me into oblivion. dont let the youtube watchbar fool ya, i watched a lot of these pieces of shit
>>4339552That's not Reddit spacing.This is Reddit spacing.If you have nothing to say, just duck out silently like an adult.
>>4339296Okay, I'll entertain this comment and post some of the good walkie talkies in terms of discussions. I'll admit I don't find most of these folks' photos interesting...but the stuff talked about is. Lots of gold in these if you can look past the mediocre photos. https://youtu.be/kAKWwljJiIQ?si=HdRd_R-88N7HYuW1https://youtu.be/BL_opcfONu8?si=MpGUP8nprhERtNamhttps://youtu.be/i1szgcB9Ono?si=e3dn4ELzefEf47_-https://youtu.be/UJEklRKFRxA?si=ldp9KVsInVE2AwPAhttps://youtu.be/9yOLOI2Y2LU?si=V4lWDOT214oR_tzahttps://youtu.be/eRgR_CfVin4?si=5Yj-EePpQXhNsAlyComment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>4338360This guy has some interesting thoughts regarding photography and his craft, and I think I got something of value from watching the video.His style of shooting in-your-face Bruce Gilden style, however, I dislike very much. It goes against my own set of values. I'd hate to be a bother to people on street, and I would also hate to be the one bothered. The ones where he talks to the people and politely asks them for photos are OK though.Really, all of the photos shown in the video were meh to utter shit. But I think that's okay, he said himself in the video you don't always end up with good photos (he event admitted the parrot portraits sucked), and they were likely just showing these on the video for completion's sake, rather than for artistic merit.
>>4340112>Really, all of the photos shown in the video were meh to utter shit. But I think that's okay, he said himself in the video you don't always end up with good photos (he event admitted the parrot portraits sucked), and they were likely just showing these on the video for completion's sake, rather than for artistic merit.That's the difference between an artist and a streetfag. The artist, even if it's a fleeting moment knows what the photo will look like before taking it. That's why visualization is so underscored by Ansel Adams. Streetfags on the contrary lack it. They don't do art, they throw shit against a wall and hope something will stick.
Streetfags stage lot of their shiznit. For instance the homosexual who took this picture of another homosexual.