Be honest, we all have at least one
>>4535690I've been here for a few years and I'm not familiar.
>>4535687>>4535694The probe macro guy
>>4535674He was too based for this board
>>4535662This board has doxed and in at least one case swatted people.Funniest one was when someone found a Flickr with Ayya's old photos which was in a man's name and they tried calling her out as stealing from it so they accidentally outed her as trans. Passing really well these days, btw.
>>4535674>preachy gearfag schizo attention whore commits self-btfoThey never learn
The price of classic cameras is getting outrageous. The 7ii is now $6,000. >just film on digitalSome of us consider ourselves camera historians, but now it is literally impossible to get most of the classics due to zoomers buying them up and cranking up the costs.
>>4527035That's what you previsualized; show some actual good pics you took (you can't)
>>4534236Dang bro man, did it really take you over a month to come up with that one?
>>4534239I am NTA akchually.Sugar is a fag and shall always be considered as such
>>4526817This but unironically. If you buy a camera because of instagram hype you need to kys immediately
Meanwhile, my 1982 Nikon FE and assorted lenses keep chugging along.
Moar?
I'm gonna dump the pictures I took on my first trip to China and share my impressions along the way. Save for the snaps, I mostly shot analog with my F90x, and with my gf's mju.I'm very much open to criticism.
>>4521763Great shots, should post some in the film general
China is honestly one of my most favorite places ever visited. people are friendly, cities are clean, food is fantasticthis thread makes me want to returntop tier thread, op, thanks a lot.
>>4521772man really pulled the big camera out in chef fei like they don't tell you they have 500 restaurants all over china
>>4521869>>4521870>>4521864Nice pics, anon. I miss Beijing even though I freaked people out for being a foreigner.
>>4521789>>4521836Very nice pictures, I particularly like these two.
Does anyone have any recommendations on where to find good scans of essential photobooks? the wiki links are all dead
check archive.org
internet archive
People have mentioned it before. But the "mirror", and books annas/zlibrary stole from internet archive got this really weird compression. Even for files with comparable sizes. Someone mentioned it happens when you try to de-DRM ia books. But who knows the actual truth.
>>4521093>>4521103nope. they are like 10-20 mb files and the images are like 400 pixel compressed trash. getting decent scanned pdfs of photo books is near impossible
>>4534739>decent scanned pdfs of photo books is near impossibleIt's a combination between needing a big ass scanner due to good photobooks being big and/or needed to bust a book's spine to have a proper flat page-to-bed surface.Very few will spend 300 dollars on an obscure photobook just to destroy it in a scan that a small handful of actual people will check.
alright now you have no excuse not to be using photoshop and(or) lightroom
>>4534580based!!
>>4533663>abandonwarelol no
>>4535412He ragequit already? k3k
tried it, it simply stopped working because i deleted the last photo i opened in italso it probably contains sneaky AI malware
Had a fiddle yesterday with their lightroom, indesign and photoshop variants. Was pretty decent desu and as a hobbyist, I would much rather use a free alternative than throw money at Adobe for something I use once or twice a month, if that.Previously been using pixlr as an alternative and much prefer these newer options over that.
Any Nokia or 2G cellphone camera photo lover here?
>>4519716What the fuck are you talking about?This whole thread is putrid shit
Took this one with my ZTE dumbphone
>>4535301i might be cheating abit, my Nokia N900.
Dusk encounter edition
>>4535181
>>4535182unfortunate motion blur in these, shouldve had a higher shutter speed I guess
>>4535183overall I like the new body. the sigma definitely isn't the sharpest lens but the R7's better AF and smaller pixels I feel like lets me get more details on a shorter, sharper focal length.
>>4535179>>4535181>>4535182>>4535183>>4535184Damn that's really nice for your first R7 pics. Clearly better than with the T7 indeed.
>>4534851>>4534852don't neglect the reflection man you have a beautiful symmetric shot right there but you missed it :(
I like editing the photos I take in Photoshop, anyone else take photos like this?1/5
>there is no photo threads on /p because critic is too harsh
>>4535294nobody here understands you can be critical without being a cockjockey about things.
>>4535295Nobody is being harsh here. And when people are harsh it's usually very justified. The reason why photo thread die is because 80% of OP never answer or engage with criticism, and posters learn it's a waste of time to write a whole ass paragraph when you won't even know whether OP read it.
>>4535298Trip on, poppet
>>4535295>>4535304>got called out for snapshitsCope and seethe
>The Ansel Adams Publishing Rights Trust has raised concerns over what it describes as the unauthorised use of Ansel Adams’s name and work in an “AI-generated colour version” of his iconic photograph shot in 1942 Moonrise, Hernandez, New Mexico, which was recently exhibited and offered for sale at a major international photography fair.>In a statement, the Trust said the work “exploited Ansel’s name, reputation, and his most iconic image, while failing to identify any human artist responsible for its creation. The Trust did not authorise, endorse, consent to, or acquiesce in the ‘AI-generated colour version’ of ‘Moonrise, Hernandez, New Mexico’ exhibited and offered for sale by Danziger Gallery at The Photography Show presented by AIPAD in April. The Trust was not consulted or notified before the work appeared. Once alerted, we reached out to James Danziger in real time, notifying him of the Trust’s rights, and asking for the work to be removed. Correspondence shared with the Trust shows that, despite our formal notice, Mr. Danziger subsequently leveraged Ansel’s name, ‘Moonrise,’ and the AIPAD presentation while pursuing a proposed commercial AI colourisation venture involving other artists’ estates.”>James Danziger made a response on the Danziger website to Ansel Adams Trust's condemnation by not only mentioning that the image is technically in the public domain, but also wrote: "As for the print itself, while A.I. served as the starting point, the final image involved extensive human intervention, editing, proofing, and refinement over many months."
>>4535055Put who on a moral high ground?
>>4535056The ones defacing Adams' works
>>4512754ansel adams was a notorious ball gargler who loved giving head and eating cum loads while out on the trails for any walker that came back. the faggot of the paths they called him.
>>4535091Seething incel
>>4535091Damn he beat you to this
I'll start
>>4524791See, this guy here proved the point I've been making for years. Make it black and white, crush the blacks and you have art™ just like Moriyama.Street photography and the circlejerk around it have been a disgrace to photography.
>>4525457POV: you're a femanon and preparing your dog for the next phase.
Back in July 2021 there was a thread here about Burna. I found it on an archive https://archived[.]moe/p/thread/3910777 but links to full images are 404. Anyone else still around from back then save the pics? TYIAA
what’s burna? you mean the country Burma? i found a ruby the size of a tangerine there
"Don't Feed The Tripfags" EditionPreviously: >>4533681
>>4535059>comes from decades of DSLR useThat's retarded, if anything DSLR demands you know your shit better. Especially old Canons, there's no recovering many stops of shadows with their FPN.
>>4535062Autist seems to just mean smart a lot of the timehttps://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10581472/High IQ people (ie: jews) = 61mp leica, 180mp phaseoneLow IQ people (ie: tripfags) = 20mp micro four thirds (5mp equivalent), 40mp fuji (8mp equivalent)
>>4535077Equivalence includes aperture, ISO, OLPF and crop factor50mm FF = 25mm MFTf2 FF = f4 MFT100 ISO FF = 400 ISO MFT20mp mft = 5mp20mp aps-c 10mpolpf = -10% resolution
>>4535086This is quality bait.
>>4535086true20mp mft photos look a bit blurry and shit, but when resized to 5mp they are super sharp and virtually noise free
I'll just share a cool photo of river
>>4534922>I wanted a green cat so I got a sony
>>4534922Shadow castThe green light shining through/reflecting off foliage is stronger than neutral sunlight and is mixed with skydome (the bluish light the sky itself radiates)You can ONLY fix this with fill flash, not by buying another camera or something, because all of them do it and none of them will let you magically fix it without fill flash or hilariously piss tinted white balance (AKA the fujifilm solution)
Go to Milford Sound
>>4534932Why are you replying to it?
>>4534968It really shows that this is taken with an iphone. Worse color separation than composite video and everything is oversharpened. Might as well be AI.
Well... I tried to find liminal and unsetting places in my Russian city.Post your liminal photos here
>>4532422>>4532425>>4532427>>4532439>>4532448Still looking for any feedback, good bad indifferent.
>>4534690Extreme indifference. The first one looks like a scene from a Source game, but it's not very interesting. There is no mood or depth to it.There's really no feedback to give.Try to find a subject next time.>>4532628This is the only shot ITT which feels even a tiny bit liminal, but the crop is too tight.
>>4532425This is a photo of a staircase.. Not much else to say
>>4526537
