>>4286767
creepy alien vibes

>>4286788
I like the lighting and colors here but this should be perspective corrected I think

>>4286829
really nice lighting here.

>>4286830
creepy but the sky wasnt this red right?

>>4286840
cool lighting


Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.

File: fixed.jpg (1.52 MB, 1351x1781)

1.52 MB JPG

>>4286788

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand

File: DSCF8777.jpg (433 KB, 2048x1365)

433 KB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Capture One 22 Macintosh
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Width	2048
Image Height	1365

File: DSCF8571.jpg (895 KB, 2048x1365)

895 KB JPG

>>4304671

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Capture One 22 Macintosh
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Width	2048
Image Height	1365

File: DSCF8578 1.jpg (664 KB, 2048x1365)

664 KB JPG

>>4304672

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Capture One 22 Macintosh
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Width	2048
Image Height	1365

I'm a noob so ignore everything I'll say
Comfy stuff but I'm not taking away much from it I guess
>>4303245 really dig this one though

>>4303244
interesting
>>4303245
nice composition
>>4303246
yes
>>4303252
yes
>>4303256
no, faggot

pretty decent /p/-tier photos. good job op

I can see talent, nonetheless most of it is BORING. Keep on trying.

>>4303240
Love this one,

>>4303240
Boring snapshits of your walk.

>>4304335
Are da jooz in the room with us right now, anon?

>>4304398
Who said anything about jews you fucking antisemite

G*d

>>4304249
not reading that shit

>>4304407
might hurt considering 99% of shitty amateurs (r)ape the new york school or new topographics, but it's truth. the 1% is just aping cinema.

>>4304333
>He's articulated very succinctly a disdain for the rudimentary.

thanks big brian. you must have experience huffing matza farts. I do appreciate your words, but the critic is obviously some type of highfalutin cunt.

File: 20221011_042347.jpg (3 KB, 100x100)

3 KB JPG

24-70
70-200
200-600

40mm
85mm
135mm

Simple as

Why does no one here like UW? It's my favorite focal range when I can make it work.

File: uxZvLQ.gif (1.78 MB, 480x360)

1.78 MB GIF

>>4302433
18mm pancake with fixed f8 is all you need

>>4304476
OP agrees.

File: c8054b9b-098b-4f06-b757-e(...).gif (330 KB, 400x211)

330 KB GIF

>>4304360
>Doing anything manually makes people think they're really photographers and more skilled.

File: Nikon-FA-3-2223555333.jpg (75 KB, 1080x672)

75 KB JPG

>>4297696
Fuckin neeerds hate seeing SPASM on their cameras bc they want to think of making image as being some exercise in purity. I love it. I shoot on programmed automagic all the time, jpg never raw, and throw out every third image just for lulz bc I'm ken fuckin rockwell and I am a goddamn photo theory arsonist.

Just don't use P you dorks, A is useful, S for those instances (you know em), B when you really need to get jiggy wit it. M when you just need to set A & S & want to fuck up your shit with some crazy fucking iso and make a pointillist painting out of your image because why not.

This shit is sophisticated AF. Matrix metering, AIS, SPASM, this thing is practically magic.

>>4304376
If you don't know how to shoot manual, it's okay, you can just say that.

>>4297696
Because PASM is dogshit if you're not a subhuman wedding "photographer".
Auto is fine though.

>>4304600
>Has a retarded gear opinion and brings up a vitriolic hatred of wedding photographers
Lemme guess, "just put A settings on every dial and make the camera look like a pentax k1000"
-Fujislug
-Leica lolcow
-Nikon Zfool
Call it

>>4304546
You could have always posted evidence of your extravagant wealth like your leica on the hood of your BMW in your 3 car garage but I have a feeling your dad doesn't let you in the garage

>>4304549
like I'm going to run around my house taking pics of expensive stuff just because some poorfag is envious of my 80 dollar camera strap
hope the bus is at least airconditioned in whatever 3rd world hellhole you live

>>4304551
>no, i dont even have a camera
protip, you can take a photo of your camera by setting it in front of a mirror.

>>4304559
anon you might be retarded

File: photo_2024-04-15_18-33-38.jpg (104 KB, 1280x960)

104 KB JPG

>>4304340

Strap!
The one in pic related is like 10€ on amazon. It's very comfortable because the rope is very thick.
The most important part is that it's very sturdy because all connections are megal.

>>4304508
It's not really abot dropping the camera. I like the strap because "sometimes" you need two hands and several lenses are not pocketable. I never carry my camera like this btw >>4304343

>>4303150
This. Just play with the settings, shooting the same scene to watch it change, you do not need to read shit and most photographers are schizoid midwits so reading shit might confuse you

Proper education was for film, especially film with flash, and yes even then the best photographers learned by experimenting.

>>4303409
>picture.with the problem
picture without the problem

>>4303067
Have you already read and understood the owners' manual of your camera? Those tend to include basics and how to deal with it using that camera.

>>4303079
That's probably the best book out there for learning photography. Read it, go out and take lots of pictures, then read it again.

>>4303067
>book to learn the basics


people on this board will literally do anything but go outside and take photos

>>4298240
Honestly people on this board are a bit shit at photography. OP's not mogging anyone with this but I got some 1970s and 1980s Nat Geos and they do mog the fuck out of almost everything I see online. Documentarian but full of style and beauty. It's insane how fun it is to flip through them and just look at the photography. I genuinely think almost no one knows how to take interesting photos anymore (at least for nature, I don't seek out much other photography). Is this a side effect of digital? Or are we all just dead inside now?

>>4304085
Side effect of everyone already seeing everything a million times and not doing enough drugs

>>4304085
>photographers that travel but not JUST to take pictures
These people are basically extinct

Taking photos walking your fuckin dog results in more honest work than a pointless “photowalk”. These people did not “do photography”. They were wide eyed journalists immersed with wonder rather than interns afraid of running afoul of state censors and old boomers doing it for the paycheck.

File: dt_CRW_2028.jpg (1.2 MB, 2052x1524)

1.2 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon DIGITAL IXUS 960 IS
Camera Software	darktable 4.6.1
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.9
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	36 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2024:04:15 15:02:16
Exposure Time	451/250000 sec
F-Number	f/2.9
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	74
Lens Aperture	f/2.9
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Subject Distance	12.46 m
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	7.70 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	2052
Image Height	1524

>>4298229
>i feel like i mog 90% of users here

that's because 90% of users here take photos of nothing

File: CRW_0035.png (3.06 MB, 1440x1080)

3.06 MB PNG

>>4285524
>It is also quite interesting to think about the conditions that made this possible in the first place.

older point and shoot cameras have way more soul then cellphones. modern cell phones look good but they have crazy amounts of automatic post processing. also small sensors with high megapixel count has the effect of making photos look soulless. then you sprinkle a CCD sensor and you got a winner.

I think I helped start this trend and the A590 has been on of my favorites.

>>4303821
Marty’s mom really needed to do some hardcore gonzo titty worship porno in her prime and it’s an unforgivable sin that she didn’t tbqhwy

File: dt_CRW_0732.jpg (1.2 MB, 1920x1440)

1.2 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon DIGITAL IXUS 960 IS
Camera Software	darktable 4.6.1
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.9
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	36 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2024:04:15 14:20:57
Exposure Time	5029/1000000 sec
F-Number	f/7.8
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	74
Lens Aperture	f/7.9
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Subject Distance	65.54 m
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	7.70 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1920
Image Height	1440

>>4285524
Get ahead of the curve and start buying vintage DSLRs before it's too late

They're already more expensive because they were always expensive, from launch. Are you ready for the future of $1200 D800s and people paying near MSRP for old EOS lenses?

File: NPC photographers.png (1.53 MB, 1024x1024)

1.53 MB PNG

>>4304500
>Only $100!? This "film" camera takes infinite photos!
>Don't order that mirrorless until you've tried THIS
>REAL FILM GRAIN ON DIGITAL! Nikon D2x in 2024
>Which one will people choose? D700 vs Z8 BLIND TEST

>>4301867
Where do you think you are nigger?

>>4297371
wide equivalent FOV compared to FF. Combined with tiny apertures (everything in focus) and long exposure. Voila. Very sharp.

>>4297371
>Is it because of the giant glass negatives?

probably. Those large formats had to have a megapixel equivalent of like over 100. it's amazing they were able to make sharp lenses.

>>4302678
>calling someone else a turbo sperg when you're the one unable to read contextual cues like the date something is published, or the shift in tone between a recommendation to a mug punter and an actual technical analysis, which he frequently gives both of, or between a statement of opinion vs fact, comparison vs absolutism, etc.

>>4300665
Look under Ryan Rockwell's page.

i think you should build the meal around the angle rather than the other way around.
food photography is so extremely fake to begin with, its basically a diorama but its edible (sometimes it isnt tho lmao)

im really just talking out of my ass here btw ive never done food photography in my life

oh and stick to one light source to illuminate the whole meal, makes for good highlights

>>4299256
I like top down to show plating and portions, but the meal can't be hot or you'll fog your lens - at least from my experience shooting in a lightbox.
I got sick of having to eat my incredible meal cold to be able to photo it, so I just take a quick phone snap and chow down now.

>>4299256
Try using a 4x5 camera.

>>4299256
Your food'll go cold if you do this shit. Just eat your meal instead of being some posh git, leave photography for more interesting subjects.

>>4299256

An easy trick is dropping the food, you could of held a grape above the meal and photographed it falling, and then the money shot of it bouncing up in the air while the rest of the food gets slightly bumped.
Best result is you need a 2nd person to just drop the plate of food and then you shoot as it hits the table and the food bounces.

>>4303560
>to show that i planed in advance
And planning that firmly in advance for a weather-dependent event is still retarded even if you were lucky. What if the nearest clear skies were 100 milss or more from the hotel?

>>4303598
He'd have a nice vacation for cheap
Why are you so mad?

File: DSC-1103 (1).jpg (4.8 MB, 4912x7360)

4.8 MB JPG

From Lancaster, PA. Nikon D800 and 80-200mm F/2.8 D

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.2 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2024:04:08 16:20:29
Color Space Information	sRGB

>>4303599
pretty sure he is mad because he waited till the last minute to go somewhere and still cucked by clouds.

>>4303598
nigger, as you can see in my picture i have a 11 month old, i'm not driving hundreds of miles out of my way at the last minute with a baby screaming in my backseat for hours because some faggy weatherman told me to. also you clearly dont regularly look at weather reports if you think they're ever accurate. the entire two weeks ahead of the eclipse it was said indianapolis was going to have either mostly cloudy or rain as the weather on monday. the skys were clear the entire time. the only time i even had rain was for like an hour on tuesday when i went to the zoo.

anyways where even are your eclipse pics itt?

File: eclipse_gimp.jpg (2.02 MB, 5194x3908)

2.02 MB JPG

just wanted to brag about my eclipse pic after seeing all of yours.

>is it post processed
yes
>is it overexposed
yes
>is it still better than the others here
yes sir

File: 69714271_1015662075699137(...).jpg (234 KB, 1080x720)

234 KB JPG

>>4302317

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

>>4302310
Trains are classy because they can have amenities on board

A bus is just cramming 50 dirty hobos into a hollowed out and stretched VW beetle

File: sdfsdf.jpg (176 KB, 700x466)

176 KB JPG

>>4302412
japan can do busses right

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 5D Mark IV
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS2 Windows
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/4.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	6720
Image Height	4480
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	350 dpi
Vertical Resolution	350 dpi
Image Created	2017:08:21 17:01:12
White Point Chromaticity	0.3
Exposure Time	1/30 sec
F-Number	f/8.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	1250
Lens Aperture	f/8.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	17.00 mm
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	1654
Image Height	1102
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>4298895
I regret never getting to see a shuttle launch. Based dude.

>>4301854
The building's called Alba Nova, but NORDITA seems like the kind of people whod' hang out there.

>>4304018
>astro gear gets used very little
that's another aspect to it, there's realistically 2-3 nights every month that's good for imaging, and of those, it depends on cloud cover. so a generous assumption would be like 8 imaging sessions per year on a single piece of gear, with people maybe upgrading gear every 5-10 years or so

my nikon labophot 2 from the 80s is going very strong. i assume most quality astro gear should last at least that long, say 2-3 decades or so. i'll look for the best quality EQ mount used in like a $2k budget

>>4303734
>Scopes are different than normal camera lenses as they try to achieve optical perfection with as little as possible chromatic aberration, astigmatism and lens distortion (but that's only if you're imaging)
anon, you just described every camera lens ever made

File: IMG_1584.jpg (300 KB, 1121x1121)

300 KB JPG

Annoyingly breezy last night, but I don't mind this one too much.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 90D
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.2 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/6.2
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2024:04:13 21:49:43
Exposure Time	1/125 sec
F-Number	f/8.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/8.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	400.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>4280143
whys this picture moving toward me ?

File: 12p.jpg (273 KB, 1373x1157)

273 KB JPG

>>4303869
seems like this comet likes to hide behind trees

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2024:04:12 22:07:56
White Point Chromaticity	0.3
Exposure Time	20 sec
F-Number	f/0.0
Lens Aperture	f/inf
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Focal Length	50.00 mm
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	6000
Image Height	4000
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard

File: IMG_7226-.jpg (2.83 MB, 3000x2000)

2.83 MB JPG

>>4239795
i have one

File: i cannot even id this.jpg (487 KB, 1800x1200)

487 KB JPG

>>4296093
that very nice, more birds the better

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-6000
Camera Software	Capture One 23 Windows
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/8.0
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	97 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Exposure Time	1/15 sec
F-Number	f/8.0
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/8.0
Brightness	5.0 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	65.00 mm
Image Width	1800
Image Height	1200
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Hard
Saturation	High
Sharpness	Soft

bump thread of photos

>>4279965
comfy/10

>>4275675
super cute