I've basically never done any photo editing, sorry. Were these emo pics just increased contrast? I've kinda tried to get the same look but I just don't get it.
>>4359722no they are not
Scene isn't emo you retarded poser
>>4359722B&w and increased contrast. Looks like it. They also have that early 2000s digital camera look. Share a pic so we can see what youre doing wrong.
Post your phone pics, what phone do you use, etc.The best camera is the one that's with you!!!
>>4359872Wtf what's so wrong about the newer ones?I'm on my 3rd and probably last pixel 3
>>4356710>bretty gud, how did you edit it?thanksedited in Lightroom mobile, set saturation to 0 and fucked around with highlights and shadows until I liked what I saw
Got an iPhone 15 Pro Max and a Sony Xperia 1 VINot sure which to keep, both of their cameras have their pluses and minuses... anyone here use either of them?
Shot on Pixel 6 Pro. I'm glad that new gen phones nowadays almost all come with an astrophotography mode for long exposures.Can definitely recommend getting a 20 dollar phone tripod if your phone supports night photography[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeGoogleCamera ModelPixel 6 ProCamera SoftwareHDR+ 1.0.540104767nlSensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)24 mmMaximum Lens Aperturef/1.9Image-Specific Properties:Image Width2268Image Height3779Image Created2023:06:30 16:37:32Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiISO Speed Rating1762Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramF-Numberf/1.9Exposure Time16.0 secSubject Distance RangeMacroSharpnessNormalFocal Length6.81 mmFlashNo Flash, CompulsorySaturationNormalContrastNormalMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageScene Capture TypeStandardSubject Distance0.27 mExposure Bias0 EVImage Height4032White BalanceAutoBrightness-11.4 EVImage Width2268Exposure ModeAutoLens Aperturef/1.9Color Space InformationsRGBRenderingCustom
>>4359808Am I?
post flowers
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image Width2741Image Height1827Number of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8Compression SchemeJPEG Compression (Thumbnail)Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution350 dpiVertical Resolution350 dpiImage Created2024:09:10 16:24:10Exposure Time1/125 secF-Numberf/2.8Lens Aperturef/2.8Exposure Bias0 EVFocal Length100.00 mmImage Width2741Image Height1827RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualScene Capture TypeStandard
>>4323601only interesting pic itt
>>4323598What lens did you use here[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNORITSU KOKICamera ModelEZ ControllerCamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 10.0 (Windows)Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2024:06:03 16:43:17Color Space InformationsRGB
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS M6 Mark IICamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Camera Raw 16.5 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.8Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2024:09:06 21:43:30Exposure Time1/1000 secExposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating100Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModeSpotFlashNo FlashColor Space InformationUncalibratedRenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandard
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATIONCamera ModelNIKON Z 50Camera SoftwareNX Studio 1.7 WSensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaColor Filter Array Pattern1103Focal Length (35mm Equiv)375 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2024:09:14 12:40:05Exposure Time1/800 secF-Numberf/6.3Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating450Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length250.00 mmColor Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width3597Image Height2023RenderingCustomExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlNoneContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
Photos from a four-day workshop I attended in Seoul, South Korea.All I shot was shit with my x100vi
These are all really nice Anon. Each photo has a strong sense of mood and theme.How are you enjoying the X100VI? I've been planning on getting one but I am worried that it won't be easy enough to take with me everytime I go out. Is it truly pocketable?
>>4359910Actually good.
>>4360147I like it, the AF is lacking, but I would rather shoot with a Fuji than a Sony ever again.They are better video cameras than photo cameras.The x100vi I think is great because of how it simplifies everything; that's all you can ask for in a camera, where you don't need to think that much except what you're trying to capture within the frame.>>4360010I started to shoot BW probably since I had the x100V, I love the Acros film simulation, but I try to emulate Tri-x 400 and go from there with my editing to fit what I want the viewer to focus on.Maybe I'll shoot colour one of these days, probably for commercial work, but personally BW cuts out most of the bullshit of colour and to shoot colour well you need to have some sort of control of your enviroment, which is hard on the street.The world becomes more honest in BW, there are also some personal reasons, but I I don't want to talk about those, it just makes me sad.>>4360017Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
god u suck OPlmaooo
>>4359896made it to post #2, saw it was OP's hand and died of cringe. what is it with high contrast b&w fags and greeting card tier metaphors
Do you just perpetually live in a state of PC vs Mac, XBOX vs PS4, Apple vs Android?I don't understand.Do you just circlejerk and read spreadsheet specs all day?At least PC masterrace people get to build their own rig, which would count as a bit of a hobby, I guess. Buy all you do is go to the store, purchase, then yell on the internet how your machine is great?
>>4358610truth nuke
>>4359691I use Panasonic and Pentax, because I'm a real photographer who doesn't care about brands.
>>4358610>subpar cash grabs by washing machine, scope, and printer companiesAs opposed to the printer and games console companies you mentioned?By your definition ZERO companies are fit to make cameras.
>>4358610>You have two choices in photography. Canon and Sony. Both are amazing. Everything else is for neurotic copers, contrarians, and the clueless dadographers who are nonetheless gearfags.Agree except for Sony. Sony cameras are not true photographic tools and never will be.
>>4359958>>4359962Sony is the best representation of reality, they make video games after all
Nikon-bros, we are so back.
>>4360139Huskyfag tier response>i took a snapshit of my dog i am the camera buying expert>lookslikemicrofourthirds.jpg
>>4360141>Huskyfag tier responseBetter than being a nophoto.>i am the camera buying expertUnironically, I bet I have more camera sales experience than anyone on the board. All I said though, was that Zf is kinda bulky in practice, and Z 40 is decent for the price. I take shitty photos, 100%, which is why I encourage others to post too, show me up instead of being a nophoto.
>>4360149>i buy a new camera every week to snapshit my dog. i know what really matters. One day you will wake up and realize a lumix gx8 is more than you need
Jeez, guys, all I was saying was that it's not as monstrously huge a camera as people claim it to be. Anyway, I've just purchased one, so I guess I'll see just how unwieldy my stupid hipster camera is when it gets here. It's certainly not a pocketable camera, but I wouldn't consider the x100 series pocketable either. I wouldn't even put my little Nikon A in my pocket, unless it was a winter coat.
>>4360153Oh for sure, I don't need much, different cameras are fun though. Last I bought was the Zf, which is coming up on a year. Maybe one day you will take photos.>>4360173It's sick, enjoy.
Anyone ever got tail with their camera?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAndroid UP1A.231005.007.F721U1UES4EXD1Image-Specific Properties:Image Width1079Image Height1759
>>4359837>average /p/ creep
keep in mind that all the chicks that were fucked in this thread were 6/10s.
>>4359847Exactly, the average creep on here needs a gimmick
>>4360099Implying men here are higher than that or even deserve a 5
>>4360099Not evenIts an open secret all men with cameras are creeps so all the models that dont have an agent and a bodyguard are desperate 3/10s that are afraid to stand next to a semi-normal man at a bar
How does one achieve this look? I understand that source subjects (in this case two edgy people) are important part of this aesthetic/vibe, but when it comes to the rest of this image's texture what is the trick here?
why don't you try looking at the catchlights
What would you even do with this?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAndroid UP1A.231005.007.F721U1UES6FXGJImage-Specific Properties:Image Width1080Image Height1289
>>4359690You sound like one of those MFT shills lol
>>4355882As much as medium format film cameras are still expensive (though I have no idea what the price at launch was) I highly doubt digital MF will retain their market value as well over time.
>>4359849That's the best part, I got mine for dirt cheap and the quality gap is objective
>>4356866the fuck? sony a7iii came out at $2000 6 years ago, try finding one without 300k shutter count below $1300, they don't lose half their value in 5 years
>>4359512heheh
>The fujislugs are waking up
>>4358805i think it's because normies rent everything else in their life, so the few things they buy to own are getting more expensive
>>4358805Consumer digital cameras peaked in the mid 2010s and were superseded by mobile phone cameras. With nothing recent worth buying and entry level MILCs dead, the handful of niche camera enthusiasts only have the small collection of late 2010s camera to buy from.
>>4358620>check eBay>$300
>>4358812>imported from Japan
>>4359937>Top mint exc+++++
I visited a museum and I got this pic, I rly like it :3
>>4359835washed out gross colorneeds more saturation
>>4359835Sony really need to fix their colour science
>>4359860I like the color, but I could have experimented with different tones and saturation for sure
>>4359835I can imagine this in the cover of my high school chemistry book.
cool
This was taken with Canon PowerShot SD10[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon PowerShot SD10Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS WindowsMaximum Lens Aperturef/2.8Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution180 dpiVertical Resolution180 dpiImage Created2006:05:10 02:18:23Exposure Time1/60 secF-Numberf/2.8Lens Aperturef/2.8Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternFlashFlash, AutoFocal Length6.41 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1Image Height1RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandard
I read somewhere that this was taken on a Canon T90 but I can’t find the source.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width2048Image Height1355Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>4356057what does it matter? You'd have to be pretty pathetic to want to seek out his attention.
>>4356081this
Do zoomers care about CCD videography? I have some old VHS video cameras I restored that have 1/2" CCD sensors inside and they look great if you bypass the tape and export the raw video right to a capture card.I've been trying to market myself to zoomers who want the VHS effect but nobody is biting .
>>4345969>>4351498I know you were looking to do actual a/v with the setup anon but if you take these crt tv videos with sonic or other 90s games and intersperse the tv flipping to channel 2-3 with the blue screen or fuzz and maybe some vintage ads and some decent audio work you could probably make a 10-15min ty vid of "pov you got home from school in 1994" or whatever and that'd pop off and be viral. if you can really stack up the footage you could make one of those ten hour videos too (even if it loops or has long periods where the TV is just time counting up/static/whatever) for the nostalgia nerds to watch while they sleep
>>4355759Thats not a bad idea. Originally the idea was to piece together the whole game as a 1-2hr video and call it POV: watching your brother play sonic because you were too young" or something.not sure exactly how your idea would work. i have 3 inputs on this tv, one is for the game console, one could be for a VCR playing old tv shows on a loop. the third could be a signal out from my laptop with a fullscreen of a site that shows old commercials streams Could be a lot of fun but the fact i have to think so hard about what to do to go viral makes me think im not cut out for this
I just got a new battery for my DVD camcorder in the mail and it seems to work fine. Can anyone recommend any specific DVD-RW discs?
>>4359024Don't ever use RW discs. Rewriteable DVDs have and always will suck. Just use one time use discs and buy a 50 pack of whatever from wherever is cheapest.
>>4359354>Don't ever use RW discs. Rewriteable DVDs have and always will suck.how badly? I actually just got a couple in the mail, lol. They seem to work fine (for now), and I'll be using them as temporary storage before I save them to my computer. I don't care about their long-term stability.
>must not compress photos>not a social media like IG>sleek professional look>meant to show off best work, not photodump>no coding/webdev knowledge required[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakePanasonicCamera ModelDMC-G81Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.3 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/5.0Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)390 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2024:09:08 18:13:17Exposure Time1/400 secF-Numberf/8.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating2500Lens Aperturef/8.0Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length195.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlHigh Gain UpContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormal
Host them yourself
>>4359673>no coding/webdev knowledge required
>>4359671>>4359680>I want it all and I want it for free.Stop making these threads >>4358182 and fuck off you retarded little shit.
>>4359680git gud scrub
>>4359671Bruh it doesn't exist.>Free>Robust>LosslessPick two. At most kek. Also see >>4359684
This photo is a bit blurry, I took it quickly because I was late for school (on my hand it says "sup 4chan")[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image Width0Image Height0Image OrientationTop, Left-HandImage Created2024:09:06 20:02:19Light SourceUnknown
>>4357251they evolved from origami
>>4357179what a disgusting troon
>>4357251we just don't know
>>4357179You will never own the sky.
>>4357181>>4357463What is going on in this thread?