What makes pic related so uncanny and unpleasant to look at? Is it the lack of shadows? Why would a photographer go for such effect?
>>4490219There's a significant percentage of women whose entire self-worth has been based on the market value of their vagina. Nothing is a stonger denial of their self worth than someone who places their poop hole as more important than their life giving slimy hole. Most humans are simple animals.
The lighting setup has been designed to provide maximum coverage from all angles.The photographer likely wanted to work fast and cheap, so he's not shooting this like an artistic shoot. He's trying to get the maximum number of ok shots in as short a time as possible. What you end up with is the very flat 80s Style porn mag look that we see here.
>>4490043It neither provokes lust nor is an irrelevant question in my view. Color accuracy matters
>>4488991I went round to sex my ex and took this. We all know why this is better.
Posting all his series. Posting first:Early Works(SELECT WORKS)1984 - 1987
>>4483069>Mexican intellectuals
LMAO most of this is just edgy shit. Technical skill really doesn't matter if it's ugly>but that's the pointDon't care, fuck off hack "modernity" shits
>>4489589>Technical skill really doesn't matterSubjectfag filtered
>>4490275Who wants to look at this horrid trash? Staging blood cult ritual slop isn't a real skill and all this appeals to is edgelords and pedo elites.
>>4483261The Klansmen looked based though.
Are CCD bridge cameras the best way to hop into the CCD trend? I don't want to have to get APS-C lenses for a CCD SLR and digital point and shoot seem terrible. Anyone have experience or their own shots to post? TIA
raw -> jpeg otherwise no edits than a cropolympus e500 + 50mm f/2 macrolike i said earlier op pick up a 4/3rds like a e300/e500 or e400 (europe) if you dont wanna buy a bunch of lenses. the lenses are rare and expensive for 4/3rds and you'll be <$100 in most cases.just be warned they really aren't good past iso 400, this was at iso 250 f2.0 1/500. the apsc ccds are good until 800 iso from the bigger sensor size. otherwise 6-10mp is enough for social media/4ch anywaysits a fun camera to use...even if it has 3 autofocus points and really needs light
>>4490260i did notice just now the pics tend to take a bit of a blue tint if i use awb, setting the wb to auto in lightroom helps more (this was edited more from raw but it doesn't look too far off from the jpeg honestly)wonder if it would hurt using a 1b skylight filter i have a bunch of those
>>4489488this,I got an ISTD and just share my Tamron lens with my K50 lmao
https://www.ebay.com/itm/167986935957might be fine just the battery/cf card is shothttps://www.ebay.com/itm/205927550133"inop" because they dont want returns?https://www.ebay.com/itm/317613350124if youre canadian worth consideringi took this with my 5d :)
>>4490920wow looks as good as nikon z6 photo.well done
If it is pleasurable, why is kitsch considered worthless?
>>4486943>faggot copeit makes 0 difference if you kys yourself now or die from AIDS later - no one cares. even your parents hate you
>>4479974>go to a social gathering>walk around starting conversations in front of ppl but only start with some inside humor that 3 ppl get, then never tell anyone what the fuck you're talking about.>come away thinking the three people who recognize your reference bc they saw it too are the only ones who "get you">everyone gets that you're a passive-aggressive asipe who has no idea how socializing works outside your own self-absorbed headno one will ever want to bang you doing shit like that anons
>>4487023exactly the point, your parents hate you by the time you're 7, and by middle age you don't give a fuck about the details of your great grandfathers pointless life. No one has any reason to give a fuck about you, if you're living for other people, you might as well end it now bc in 3 quick generations no one will be left alive with any living memory of your existence. You'll be as interesting to humanity as some random shoemaker was in the 1300s.Better find a fucking purpose in life, bc if it's breeding your way to relevancy like a dimwitted suburban housewife, that is absolutely nothing.
>>4487031oh look its the angry liberal, this time telling us why he’s so angry>the grapes are sour anyways and anything people used to do and think is for idiotsHumans are the only thing that is economically and philosophically real. Everything else is made up by humans. Gold has no value. History has no value. Only dynasty even comes close to being true. Cloning yourself to maintain an empire. You only think reproduction is pointless because you have convinced yourself to own nothing and possibly even that ownership is bad. The people who instilled these values in you believe the complete opposite and take reproduction as a form of cloning so seriously that they are highly inbred to the point of having unique genetic disorders and use genital mutilation to differentiate themselves from what they own. And that what, is quite a lot, including you.
>>4487031>theres a massive tribe following the exact words of a long dead patriarch>actually multiple tribes but only one that’s very public about it>huge fucking organizations that are just kids working with the success and philosophy of their father, everywhere>everything that is influential in the world is just the children of some guy, doing business with his wealth and wishes in hand>YOUR KIDS WILL HATE YOU, MAKE IT INTO MEDIA AND DIE CHILDLESS!Mmmmm sureHave as many kids as abraham if you want to be relevant k bb?
Which camera bag do you currently own? Does anything currently compete with the McKinnon Sling in terms of price+quality+features? Trying to find one of a similar size that will be comfortable enough for moving around.
On a related topic, I'm tired of these pleather lens pouches that start to flake whenever you actually start using them, like pic rel. Any tips for replacement?
>>4487599I have the 350-II, holds my Zf, Z50II, 180-600, 28, 35, 105, 50, and 28-400 with extra batteries, tripod, and pocket light...
There are simply too many bags. We need 3, maybe 4 bags at most.
>>4490826I have a dozen now, it's getting out of hand. Some are leftovers from when I was working in commercial photography but I don't want to get rid of them either.
peak design insert in a jansport, I really can't see myself needing anything bigger or "better"
It is time.
>>4489580I did have a camera with me, but also forgot to recharge the battery AND bring the spare battery with me...
>>4489784Little did you know, even if you’d taken charged batteries, you left the SD card at home…
this is prolly one of my best phone pics ever
>>4490938retard
LEICA Reporter Jacket MONOCHROM editionIn this thread, we're going to talk about photographic fashion which is what we wear when we're photographing or filming and doing related stuffs(developing, scanning, reviewing, printing, sucking up the client's shit, etc)What do you wear when you photograph? What is your must have /p/hasion item? Do you have any item you're looking for?
>>4483949so true
>>4483190>not taking the shopliftpill
>>4483187>what do you wear moleskin like a pretentious fart sniffing parisian, with pockets big enough for telephoto lenses
Usually some form of jumpsuit and my camera purse. Easy to move in for when you need to pop a squat, easy to clean for when you have to get dirty, and somewhat fashionable.
New color film!!!lucky 200 has finally dropped.Anybody shot it yet? waiting for my order to arrive.
to think lomography sold literal garbage rolls (some even marked with letters and codes on top of the image) for $20, and still do
Damn I expected chinaslop to cost less than Kodak Gold
>>4488601>>4488638>>4488641its cheaper if you are from a third hole shithole, a roll of Gold cost 15 usd for me. And Lucky its just 9 USD so yeah.
>>4488583I've shot with the BW 400. I just finished my roll of Lucky 200, but I haven't developed it yet.
>>4488583how long does Reflx Lab take to ship to the US?
at what age and how did you find that you were into photography/videography?
>>448888914kf frames?Someone I know bought a cheapo canon rebel and sigma 70mm macro and valoi scanning kit to do 750 negs and did the laziest ever negative lab pro fixes because their family’s standard was "as long as we can tell whats on them"Good luck!
>>4488889Bless you for going through the collection, plus now you can turn your relative into the next Vivian MeyerPost some for us
>>4488889post your family anon
>>447680813, I got bullied in school, came back home crying, found a camera and then got lost in it for hours. Photography gave so much consolation over the years.
>>4490485then you got bullied again because the camera you found 1 year ago was a SNOY
Why are photography YouTubers so shit? They mostly churn out boring nontent while dressing like a copy of a copy of a copy of someone who thought he might closet cosplay Ansel Adams. Who are they aping?Almost all have the cadence and tone of a best buy sales associate either slowly conniving a golden HDMI cable sale or postponing their suicide on a Sunday evening only since their parents are still alive; with no in-between.I meet smarter and more interesting people IRL at camera club or local stores, so it's not as if this hobby is exclusively for people prescribed Klonopin and SSRIs.Half of them are just talking head slop direct to camera talking about what gear to buy (micro four nerds)The ones that do teardowns and repairs of gear are usually fine, but those aren't exactly photo videos at that point.The only guy that does the "video of taking photos" thing I can stand is Nick LoPresti since he doesn't talk like he's constipated, but lately the lack of constipation has become a problem since he's been diarrhea-shitting up my sub box with low-effort commentary videos sitting in front of a green screen. Idk who he's aping there, 2016 twitch? Don't like it, especially one where he and his wife are politisperging about shit like how "they can't use Google search for inane things because it'll track you" for what feels like several minutes.Snappiness may be my second favorite even though he looks and talks like a queer (he has kids so I guess he isn't technically). At least he does ridiculous things with cameras that are more interesting than "I walked and took a photo of something and had some ennui about it".Also, I hate gxAce with a passion, dead horse of a gimmick beaten into dust at this point. 80% of his videos serve no purpose to the modal viewer since they're just a rain-dance to the corporate marketing teams to get them to send him gear. (Also combining sloppy wet deep-throat glazing prose with an aloof tone is uniquely excruciating to listen to.)
>>4473148I still enjoy his content and I've been watching him since he was doing videos for redwolfairsoft
>>4466377The man who discovered DNA even said blacks are genetically prone to low intelligence get over itThere are a few good men but overall they’re unevolved. Natural civilizational selective pressures could fix their race in about 500 years but only if you stop giving them gibs and actually treat them as equals. As poorly as you treat single white male "failures". Truth hurts. The best time to start is today. Do business, not charity, with africans. And let the failures fail. Let them be disproportionately failures. It is the only way they will ever be our equals short of lethal eugenics measures.
>>4489676This is a photography board.
>>4473148I like his stuff, watched him a lot when I was getting into photography, now not so much though.I bumped into Lok a few years ago.
>>4484429I've just watched that video a few days ago and it's actually pretty interesting.That video wasn't a collab with Laica, he just tells a story at the end that halfway through production of that video (where he borrowed two Leicas from his buddies to try out) Leica coincidentally invited him to work on some future project.So that video wasn't an ad. Whether or not you think that would influence his conclusions is up to you I suppose
photos
>>4452674Go forbid a /p/ guy catches a person front on. They'd be in bed for a week afterwards with anxiety and panic attacks
>>4490213Would you settle for something from the side instead? Sorry I missed focus.
Anything smaller than MF is cope EditionPrevious: >>4485653
>>4490286I've honestly never had issues seeing what I'm trying to photograph through a rebel's optical viewfinder. Maybe for actual night time, outdoors street photography but even really dimly lit museums put enough light on objects that I can see them by eye through the viewfinder, even if the resulting photo is too dark or noisy etc.Anyways, your reply is in reference to "Modern APS-C sensors"?Are there any DSLRs that have relatively modern sensors that can be had for under 600$ used? As I understand it nobody has made DSLRs in at least 3-4 years though, maybe longer?I'm not inherently opposed to mirrorless cameras, mind you, I've just never used one and the idea of using a rear display to preview shots seems really unappealing to me unless the display was at the same resolution my photos would be, and I doubt any affordable camera has a on body display like 4000-6000 pixels wide
>>4490699Pentax have made a few DSLRs in the last few years, the K3-III does look pretty interesting with a decent resolution and good AF (on paper). Canon's latest and greatest was the 90D which has an even higher resolution and not bad AF. Neither of those are on DXO so I can't quantify the sensor performance. However, Nikon's D7200 is and has similar performance to the A6600, actually a bit more dynamic range at ISO 100 and 200.Personally I wouldn't start investing in antiquated technology and a dead mount but it could very well work for you and it would save you some money. I'm just too used to the advantages of mirrorless to go back now.
>>4490225>buffer fills up>writes blank framesoof that hurtw-wait I mean… the limited buffer isn't actually a problem, if you're properly taking the time to frame each shot and not just blasting away like a retardhaha gottem pentax wins again
>>4488324What about the Tamron 70-300 for Z-mount? Seems pretty good to me.
>>4490702What are the advantages of mirrorless besides more compact?
Insta threadWill follow anyone>horgen_fotoHad anyone got tips on how to find less popular content?The algorithm is just feeding me terrible tiktok reels with millions of views all day long.
What is the best export setting for this piece of trash website? It burled the fuck out of my photos. I uploaded them from website and they were fine but phone they look like they were taken on a fucking potato FUUUUCCCK
>>4488603Zuck will ask you to send him videos of your butthole. Contact the insta team asap
>>4488784That's not due to any export setting. Instagram often just likes to not show the full (Instagram) resolution of images when you view them. Sometimes it "pops in" after a short while, but it has nothing to do with your local connection. It is insta deciding not to give your images bandwidth.
>>4488784I had the same problem. Instagram seems to be optimized for phones (as it was originally designed to be a platform for phone pictures) So if you use high format pictures those appear bigger and in higher resolution on the phone. Anything else will get compressed to shit and only be shown very small naturally.
>>4470877gomoseksualist.
Goodbye photoshop.
>>4484670>flexes getting duped like a foolEspecially if you have money it even more retarded to spend it on software, lmao.
>>4490037What should we be spending money on? Why is buying software bad?
>>4490037>>4490146Buying things is fine. Reasonable purchases are the hallmark of a functioning capitalist society.The more docile take is that Adobe hasn't added anything meaningful since CS5 and uses a predatory and overpriced model to squeeze consumer dry while offering few reasons to upgrade or subscribe. Since you can't (legally or through first-party channels) get a hold of older versions for less money, new users are stuck in this late-stage shithole that is Adobe subscriptions.>inb4 buying things badBuying terrible value products is bad.
>>4490151>The more docile take is that Adobe hasn't added anything meaningful since CS5Sounds more like early versions of Photoshop are fine for normies, but they have definitely added a lot since then. Their pricing model is cheaper than it was historically, like with CS5, and more accessible now. All things considered, it's still relatively cheap for how much time I use it.Older versions were more expensive. The only price increase for me has been within the last year, going from $10/month to a whopping $15/mo. If it's bad value for you, don't get it. But saying it's bad value in general is very silly.
Thank you, Shantanu Naharayaniyenu.
