Film photography is better due to low sensitivity in dark areas. No one needs to see what is in dark areas most of the time. Just imagine this photo with unnecessary crap in shadows.
>>4474172Have you even read Ansel Adams, anon?>I could not find my Weston exposure meter! The situation was desperate: the low sun was trailing the edge of clouds in the west, and shadow would soon dim the white crosses ... I suddenly realized that I knew the luminance of the Moon – 250 cd/ft2. Using the Exposure Formula, I placed this value on Zone VII ... Realizing as I released the shutter that I had an unusual photograph which deserved a duplicate negative, I quickly reversed the film holder, but as I pulled the darkslide, the sunlight passed from the white crosses; I was a few seconds too late! The lone negative suddenly became precious.
>>4474174He didn't need a light meter because he knew where he wanted to place the moon. Expose for shadows and develop for highlights is the basic idea before you really understand what exposure and development does in relation to producing density/contrast on film, which is then translated onto photographic paper when making a print.
>>4474179The moon was one of the lower highlights, anon.
>>4474282Can you read, anon?
cool photos
Sprawl 'em EditionPreviously: >>4470709
max imagesnew thread
>>4478700DIDNT SAGEREEEEEEEEEEE
>>4474364Please stop posting this
>>4474364I think this is a nice direction but it would definitely benefit from blurred edges, I think it would enhance the “illustrative” effect.
>>4474364I just saw the way you’ve blended the neck with the white background. If the entire image was blended into the background that way, I think it would be a great artistic effect. Also, since it’s supposed to look “illustrative,” I think, sharpness is working against you. Softness could improve the aesthetic quality of the image.
Here are my bad photos of a theme park. I only took a 20 year old digishit with me. EnjoyA photo of the hotel is mandatory
>>4471014>>4471017lf1 anon here...i didn't post any images here yet...i bought it..saw that fat hair on sensor and dropped ituntil today when i fixed it...will take it out soon.
>>4452698>DevagI'd like to D her vag, if you know what I mean.
>>4464056
>>4464047now I want some halbes hendl
>>4452734sick
Anyone else here working a regular job/day job as a photographer? I've been working as a real estate photographer for a while and still do side jobs for things like corporate portraits/events, and I'm curious if anyone else on /p/ works in photography too.
>>4475963It's the poor use of HDR. Using HDR is standard in real estate photos, but not everyone implements it in a nice way.
>>4467709>that layoutwtf
>>4476430I imagine it's a blind wall to make the dinning party feel fancier/less distracted but it's done in a very small place it might as well break the harmony, doesn't help the fancy chandelier is in the kitchen spot either
>>4476430There are some real weird places around. Last week I photographed a place where downstairs just had two bedrooms and one bathroom but the upstairs was a bedroom, big bathroom, massive kitchen and massive living room. There was no reason for it either, it was a completely normal looking two story from outside and was just weirdly designed inside.
>>4467257I work in commercial photography for almost a year but ended up quitting and going back to a normie job. Like others have said, it starts to zap your enjoyment of photography. I probably only took my camera out for fun maybe 2 times during my entire tenure since I just didn't feel like going out and taking more photos after spending the whole work week taking photos.I think the only photography job that might be enjoyable is one that is very creative (cars, models etc) while anything like products, buildings, real estate etc would be more for someone that doesn't have much interest in photography to begin with.
I am going to buy one as soon as they hit the market in early Novemeber. I hope I get the 1987 edition. It's fire. Which one are you hoping to score?You are going to be getting one right /p/?You aren't gonna be a contrarian try hard no Charmera /p/haggot are you /p/? ISHYDDT
>>4470152Shoot Ektar at 50 and E6 that shit nigger.
>>4471135it's just not the same. sigh...
>>4470376INSULT MASTER WONG AND MEET SWIFT DEATH, PIG
I caved to the hype and bought three. Only received one for now.
>>4470128>cheap chinkoid e-wasteNo wonder you fags are drooling over it.
>Same as M11>Only difference is EV1 has an EVF(same with Q3, SL3) instead of Optical Range Finder>9000 USDThoughts?
It should have had L mount. >L mount: you can use M with adaptor>M mount: only usable with M One thing one can hope is that Leica making Q with L mount with IBIS.
>>4477435maybe they wanted m native system because it's a Leica m and they like to sell m lenses to the m person who had an L before
>>4477321how does this work when you edit your photo? does the photo editor add its own signature or does it add a second signature and preserve the first or what happens exactly
>>4477424They were already usable via live view or Leica's hot shoe EVFs
>>4477236Leica chads won
#1post ur clouds edition
im not really good at photography but i like how this one photo i took turned out
in hindsight i shouldve took a horizontal photo
New thread[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Pixel CompositionRGBImage OrientationTop, Left-HandColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1000Image Height667
>>4476713nibba you telling me you took over 2k pics for that ? get a tracker already!
>>4476763someday i will, at least I'm thinking about itright now i'm unemployed, so no new expensive gear for me
>>4408437insane stuff, congrats! any chance of getting a 4k wallpaper version?
Is A6 Lemmon going to be visible again in january/feb?
>>4476713good job! What's your next target?
>reach editionPrevious thread: >>4475772
Please recommend me an easy to use camera for my upcoming Thailand trip. It should be discreet enough for taking pics at night in Pattaya's red light district. Preferably not a point and shoot.
>>4478744Im waiting for answer
>>4478672Canon SureShot A-1
Why isn't there one ultimate camera that does it all? Why must there be so many? I just wanna buy one for life.
>>4479210Buy an old Nikkormat. that's it, that's literally all you need.
I need to see flat earth.
>>4478362>equivalency is a thing >applies this to f/ stop but not focal lengthcANON has infected your brain
>>4478233maybe shoot rawtinker with lensfun databasetype raw develop recipe for each pic
>>4478354What iPhone has a 1 inch sensorI think they're just reaching 2/3"
>>44783761/1.33" is common as fuck these days (3/4 of an inch). Pretty sure the 2021 Google Pixel had that so I'd be fuckin floored if the iPhone isn't doing better than it in 2025
>>4478382Only the Japanese (Sony, Sharp) and Chinese (Xiaomi, Ulefone, vivo, Huawei) do 1" and above in smartphones, American and Korean brands do not care.
no coloreds allowed
>>4477188Sony ZV-E10 with a cheap chinese glass, 7Artisans 35mm 1.4 mk I>mfw snoy is only good in b&w
>>4477508very smooth
If it's wrong, why is it so good?
>>4475876Cope, EVF cuckold.
>>4475882the only cope here is pretending you use a camera
>>4475882>EVFThe hell is this?
>>4473816>>4473212>>4473207Who are these retards that don’t put a maximum on iso, I shoot P and it’s great every time , when things are fast put it on S, manual mode is for dorks who want to make things harder for themselves for no reason other than ‘I’m a pro now’. P does better than you
>>4473212Retard if you're gonna post Yoshitoshi ABe on /p/ you have to post the drawings with the SMEGMA>FOVEON WON
Any love for the Game Boy Camera and printer here?Sure nowadays even the chinkest of cameras and printers may be better with printing via phone bigger and clearer photos but there's a certain charm and fun in doing with with a Game Boy of all things.
I fucking love the Gameboy Camera, here's a few pics I took.Always wanted to get one of those upgrades, an optical zoom would be so cool.
>>4470551No way me too
It gets surprisingly good detail.
Can someone tell me what lightning equipment I would need, to recreate either of those photos?
>>4433007thx
>>4456338second this.
>>4448279Damn, I'd voyeur peek into her sexy>>4456337Stroke of genius more likely
>>4472231thank you anon, i wish you a lot of raw
>>4478140Thanks bro, I've been enjoying skyn recently, but some day for sure.
Post your man bags
>>4461465I currently just carry my camera on a diagonal shoulder strap. I used a camera bag for a while but I haven't found it particularly convenient, and found stashing my camera away is a great way to keep me from taking photos. I could do with a good all purpose backpack though and some way to store a lens or two and some filters, that type of stuff. Pretty happy carrying my stuff on the strap right now. I carry everything from film P&S to an R6 II with 24-70 2.8 and battery grip on a strap.
I'm thinking about getting something that holds a big lens (canon 24-105 won't fit my jeans pocket) for times when I'm shooting at an event but can't be bothered to carry my whole bag with me at all times but still need one lens for change. some kind of milsurp pouch that could go on my pants belt? any ideas?
>>4477453>(canon 24-105 won't fit my jeans pocket)>>(canon 24-105 won't fit my jeans pocket)>>>(canon 24-105 won't fit my jeans pocket)
>>4477453buttpacks, take your pick: us alice, british mod, etc.
this is how i carry the hasseblad so that its always around my neck even in the bag.
