>>4305303
On the /p/ ranking you’re near huskyfag and hairy negatives desu sorry. Same gearfag that was doing ai upscale tests to argue about four thirds?

Can isi or someone please demonstrate what photography is really about?

Why would you ever want a manual focus camera? Shit is fucking dogshit. "oh, another ruined street shot, I guess if I shoot at f18 I could get it in focus, maybe"

>>4305307
okay nophoto

>>4305307
>Can isi or someone please demonstrate what photography is really about?
Why can't you?

>>4305291
>magnum photographers
That's an oxymoron, most of what gets published by Magnum isn't even photography but upsold snapshits.

File: LRG_DSC03962_Original.jpg (766 KB, 1616x1080)

766 KB JPG

Chitwan, Nepal

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-6000
Camera Software	ILCE-6000 v3.20
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/5.6
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	60 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	350 dpi
Vertical Resolution	350 dpi
Image Created	2019:03:04 17:01:54
Exposure Time	1/80 sec
F-Number	f/5.6
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	500
Brightness	4.0 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	40.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1616
Image Height	1080
Rendering	Custom
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

File: IMG_2744_Original.jpg (2.35 MB, 3648x2048)

2.35 MB JPG

Arches national park - Utah, USA

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon PowerShot SX120 IS
Camera Software	QuickTime 7.6.9
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2009:01:29 13:30:55
Exposure Time	1/160 sec
F-Number	f/4.0
ISO Speed Rating	80
Lens Aperture	f/4.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	6.00 mm
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	3648
Image Height	2048
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Landscape
Unique Image ID	3dcb07d34911085b0000000000000000

>>4305275
6mm focal length?!?

>>4305278
wait till you find out about phone cameras

>>4305263
>german
what a shame
would be nice to meet a local czechbro on here

>>4304972
Its just underexposing to protect highlights and pushing shadows and midtones with a different luma curve that roughly corresponds to 1 iso stop worth of gain.

i just got a k70 as my first dslr and my goodness there are so many settings.
are there any guides of what some good defaults are?

>>4305202
I wouldn't take these recommendations as facts, but it probably gives you some of the more important settings to consider.
https://www.pentaxforums.com/reviews/pentax-k-70-review/recommended-settings.html

>>4305207
that's good thanks, I have to give the manual a good read

>>4304974
That makes sense. In >>4304972 f/8 became f/11, but at the same time ISO is increased to 200. Why is this? Doesn't this keep the "effective" exposure at 0 EV?

>>4304931
but i usually zoom the pic to see details, not all the pictures are viewed in the frame that its supposed

>shoot against window
>"I'll just underexpose so that the outside isn't blown out"
>now can't make it not look like shit without blowing out the window
Fucking with sliders isn't gonna fix that is it, I'd have to use masking and shit. Kinda hard when there's a person sticking in front of the window.

>>4304990
tone equalizer
just don't go overboard with it either >>4303063

>>4304991
Nice, that's it. Much appreciated.

>>4304990
If you can go back in time, try some fill flash. It may help

>>4304514
You could probably try them, but they might not turn out the same. Prob will need some tweaking to your preference.

>>4303043
>>4303071
55-200 desu
It's a steal these days, barely more expensive than the kit zoom

>>4304821
you mean the the XC50-230mm used is around ?
because yes new the 55-200 is also around the same price as the kit lens new but at this price i'm better buying the 70-300 i think

but my initial question was more if the used 50-230 is worth 200 bucks or just a waste of money

>>4305206
>if the used 50-230 is worth 200 bucks or just a waste of money
You can get the 55-200 here for 350 so I'd say go for the latter

>>4304428
post a shot you took that you find the image quality lacking on

File: DSC02495.jpg (1.95 MB, 4446x1984)

1.95 MB JPG

>>4301592
The III is hopeless for video, lol

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	DSC-RX100M3
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Camera Raw 16.2 (Macintosh)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.5
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	31 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2024:03:27 16:11:03
Exposure Time	1/250 sec
F-Number	f/4.0
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	125
Lens Aperture	f/4.0
Brightness	9.9 EV
Exposure Bias	-1 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	11.45 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

i miss my rx100m3 :[
I sold most of my digital cameras for drugs or music gear a while ago now. rx100 is what I missed the most.

Shame what has ahppened to the secondhand camera market, especially compacts

File: _DSC4201.jpg (4.39 MB, 5015x3134)

4.39 MB JPG

It will do 95% of everything you could ever want to do with a camera. Just get it.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	DSC-RX100M5
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.1 (Macintosh)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	70 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2024:01:11 19:55:49
Exposure Time	1/200 sec
F-Number	f/6.3
Exposure Program	Shutter Priority
ISO Speed Rating	125
Lens Aperture	f/6.3
Brightness	9.0 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	25.70 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

>>4301637
in portraits you have control over subject to background distance

just got gifted an rx100 II, been pretty neat

>>4297335
with like an rx100 III, you get slightly better than an aps-c camera + typical f3.5-f5.6 kit lens

>>4304802
>cultist post

>>4304804
I mean I love Olympus cameras, but I also love Canon cameras. Some canon cameras are amazing. If he had said get a 5d 1, 2 or 3, as those are probably similar prices to an EM1 mk1 or 2 I would probably say go for the 5D. However, I'm not going to sit here and pretend like a 90D is a good choice for anyone beyond a classroom getting cameras for their students or a really casual shooter. It's just not true

>>4304802
>Even the 7d and the 6d aren't made very well
You could tell that from the AF array and the X-sync speed.

>>4304802
>non-spiteful build quality.
When are they gonna bring back the metal E-M5?

>>4305151
I know right, the mark 2 will always be my fave. So weighty and the last one to keep that metal tripod mount. Worth giving up 4 megapickles for i reckon

>>4305023
took me a second, nice

I'm shitting bricks rn

>>4305023
Did you put a soya Jacob in this an image? WOW!

File: FJIMG_20170121.jpg (3.22 MB, 3223x2412)

3.22 MB JPG

some real oldschool photo from my nexus 5. Sometimes I revisit old photos and try what you can do with modern editing tools, it gets better and better over the years.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Model	Nexus 5
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.2 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2024:04:07 21:39:18
Exposure Time	1/1150 sec
F-Number	f/2.4
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/2.4
Focal Length	3.97 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: IMG_20240411_073529 (2).jpg (1.25 MB, 2048x1024)

1.25 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	samsung
Camera Model	SM-G985F
Camera Software	Adobe Lightroom 9.2.2 (Android)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Created	2024:04:11 07:35:29
Exposure Time	1/1250 sec
F-Number	f/1.8
ISO Speed Rating	50
Lens Aperture	f/1.8
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	5.40 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: PXL_20240402_195016829.jpg (1.57 MB, 4080x3072)

1.57 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Google
Camera Model	Pixel 7
Camera Software	HDR+ 1.0.611900660zd
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.9
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	24 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2024:04:02 12:50:16
Exposure Time	11/5000 sec
F-Number	f/1.9
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	46
Lens Aperture	f/1.9
Brightness	6.7 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Subject Distance	0.22 m
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	6.81 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	4080
Image Height	3072
Rendering	Custom
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Digital Zoom Ratio	1.9
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Macro

Anytime I want a demonstration or an explanation of some phone setting and check youtube for a visual answer, it's an Indian. Is phone photography big in India or something?

File: Photo 31-3-2024, 1 47 21 AM.jpg (3.08 MB, 3024x4032)

3.08 MB JPG

: )

>>4304045
The only consistency with fucks like the one you responded to is their hatred of White people. You'd think they wouldn't bother with a slow board like /p/, unless one of them lost a political argument with some random ideological opponent who posts here and then whined to his associates afterwards.

They're not very subtle about it. They would've gone farther in this particular thread if they hadn't laid into the "le cowboy" angle so heavily and making their biases obvious.

>>4303312
you modified the colors too much
also crap compression
>Screenshot
looks like it's a screenshot of video not even a photograph

looks like some instagram reels shit

>>4304067
https://www.instagram.com/reel/C5g-xRdpbvv/
You were right.

>>4303312
Not on film 0/10

File: 100781780_295617584766971(...).jpg (29 KB, 1920x1280)

29 KB JPG

in 2017 I took a photo of my penis with the eclipse but it didn't turn out very good because i was very cold

>>4304122
>he now expects cameras of increasing technical sophistication... the actual results...usually remain far below the technical potential.

This is true of everything in consumerism. Boomers demand 4k oled panels then watch shitty 1080p, low bitrate garbage beamed to them by TV providers

People insist on building trucks capable of towing extreme amounts, with lift kits and other modifications for rock crawling despite the fact they will never use it for such.

Because consumerism is not connected to anything other than consuming. If camera manufacturer's released a new camera with the same specs as a previous camera. Despite the fact a large portion of the consumers aren't currently using the camera to it's fullest potential will be upset, not because he is being limited but because he no longer has a reason to consume and without a reason to consume he realizes that he doesn't need to suffer the job that he endures because it pays well. He doesn't need to make the 45 minute daily commute he suffers through. He can no longer justify having missed large portions of his children's childhood. Without consumerism, the very foundations for the modern life are knocked out from under it and people have to face the fact that they are deeply unhappy and have been tricked into living a life they hate. So instead they consume it gives the illusion of progress and a sense of a tangible increase in material standing to justify all the time spent doing meaningless, unfulfilling busy work for 40+ hours a week.

this is funny because it was probably a 4x5 studio boomer complaining about kids and their damn 35mm film cameras

>>4304288
It is pathetically easy to use a camera to its highest potential

Just crop, and expect it to still look good. Or turn the ISO up. Or expect your prints to look sharp close up.

>>4304294
way way, way way back when, people were buying relatively high speed cameras where the shutters went all the way up to 1/1000 (WOW) to take photos of landscapes and posed groups of family members at f/11. nothing else.

these days yeah its piss easy. point a camera at a dog, go to a sports game, be one of the million people who took an easily accessible community college art class online... but back then, they could not google, and the fastest sport was baseball.

>>4304292
>this is funny because it was probably a 4x5 studio boomer complaining about kids and their damn 35mm film cameras
..with a light meter

File: _1216496.jpg (3 MB, 1800x1199)

3 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Panasonic
Camera Model	DC-GH5M2
Camera Software	darktable 4.4.2
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/5.6
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	600 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2024:04:14 22:36:56
White Point Chromaticity	0.3
Exposure Time	1/320 sec
F-Number	f/11.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	1600
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	300.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1800
Image Height	1199
Rendering	Custom
Exposure Mode	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	High Gain Up
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	High
Sharpness	Hard
Image Quality	Unknown
White Balance	Auto
Focus Mode	Auto
Spot Mode	Unknown
Image Stabilizer	Unknown
Macro Mode	Normal
Shooting Mode	Manual
Audio	No
Flash Bias	0.00 EV

File: 20230324-DSCF6528.jpg (1.18 MB, 2000x3000)

1.18 MB JPG

Really need a longer lens

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: _1216500.jpg (3.02 MB, 1199x1800)

3.02 MB JPG

>>4304327
More of this blue tit

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Panasonic
Camera Model	DC-GH5M2
Camera Software	darktable 4.4.2
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/5.6
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	600 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2024:04:17 00:34:49
White Point Chromaticity	0.3
Exposure Time	1/320 sec
F-Number	f/11.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	1600
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	300.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1199
Image Height	1800
Rendering	Custom
Exposure Mode	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	High Gain Up
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	High
Sharpness	Hard
Image Quality	Unknown
White Balance	Auto
Focus Mode	Auto
Spot Mode	Unknown
Image Stabilizer	Unknown
Macro Mode	Normal
Shooting Mode	Manual
Audio	No
Flash Bias	0.00 EV

File: _1216497.jpg (2.82 MB, 1800x1200)

2.82 MB JPG

>>4305019

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Panasonic
Camera Model	DC-GH5M2
Camera Software	darktable 4.4.2
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/5.6
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	600 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2024:04:17 00:30:52
White Point Chromaticity	0.3
Exposure Time	1/320 sec
F-Number	f/11.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	1600
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	300.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1800
Image Height	1200
Rendering	Custom
Exposure Mode	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	High Gain Up
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	High
Sharpness	Hard
Image Quality	Unknown
White Balance	Auto
Focus Mode	Auto
Spot Mode	Unknown
Image Stabilizer	Unknown
Macro Mode	Normal
Shooting Mode	Manual
Audio	No
Flash Bias	0.00 EV

File: DSC_0732a.jpg (4.79 MB, 6000x4000)

4.79 MB JPG

Dusky Grouse, Mt. Rainier Nat. Park

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D3400
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/6.3
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	450 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Exposure Time	1/1000 sec
F-Number	f/6.3
Exposure Program	Not Defined
ISO Speed Rating	800
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	300.00 mm
White Balance	Auto
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

r-photo is one of the better free options
most free options in this category kinda suck

>>4304405
unless I'm retarded, that appears to be an app to recover deleted stuff. I'm looking for something that fix's jpegs that are corrupted, not deleted. That, or I'm too stupid to use it properly???

>>4304711
>I'm too stupid
yes
also
>>>/g/

>>4304773
I debated that before posting, but it seems like the photog anons should have some experience in this realm. Besides, /g/ is too broad. If you guys can't come back with anything, I'll try over there...

>>4304652
>Sony would be... um...
Nosy?

>>4300343
hmm. I didn't want nikon to die, but I don't know about this. I half feel like nikon should die, and RED seemed like a cool company.

>>4304652
SNOZZ

>>4303506

Because you cannot really patent a thing like that.
Nikon knows that and decided to implement it. Then, due to how everything went in court they decided to save money (time) directly buying Red so settle everything asap.
But due to the fact that the patents would reasonably not hold, it's reasonable to expect they will not even try to enforce it on canon and sony.

>>4304652
>>4304660
And of course Trannysonic

>>4304937
I think you made this thread to cry about trips in

OP here, I just really like this photographer and thought I could support him by recommending him to others. Calm down please, and keep on topic.

whats that sonny i dont read text posts on /p/

>>4304937
>brings up ambush out of nowhere
>cries about some lens
one peek at an archive tells me why you're jelly

>>4304953
Whats an archive just post a photo instead of some edited twitter screencap from /pol/