[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/p/ - Photography

Name
Options
Subject
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]

[Catalog] [Archive]

File: IMG_1825.jpg (62 KB, 750x750)
62 KB
62 KB JPG
How did they get blown the F out by Nikon off all people?
>artemis mission back to the moon
>using Nikon Z9 instead of glorious German 100mp

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution71 dpi
Vertical Resolution71 dpi
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
Image Width750
Image Height750
Scene Capture TypeStandard
2 replies omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4304865
Scandinavia is rightful Germanic clay.
>>
>>4304860
NASA didn't use the H series either, did they?
>>
>>4304860
>>4304863
most likely the body is good but the lenses suck, also the test is perhaps quite wrongly done
>>
>>4304860
>German
they're chinese now, just like jaguars/land rovers have been indian for the past 15 years
>>
>>4304865
>It's swedish you mongrel
chinese you retard
https://www.slrlounge.com/dji-now-majority-shareholder-of-hasselblad-what-does-that-mean/

File: IMG_1477.jpg (384 KB, 1179x1507)
384 KB
384 KB JPG
Is the Peak Design Travel Tripod really the best lightweight compact tripod that still gets the job done?
>pic related

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
CommentScreenshot
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1179
Image Height2556
Scene Capture TypeStandard
90 replies and 18 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4303431
is it any good?
what's a nice aliexpress tripod?
preferably carbon one
>>
>>4299183
it's also 1/4 the max height at best lol
>>
>>4299267
Such a SHIT tripod desu
There are really worlds between this and a proper Gitzo (or even a run off the mill Leofoto)
But GODAMMIT it is a sexy design
>>
>>4299628
>Is Colorado Tripod the best option? (picrel)
Sure, if it's ever going to ship lol
They've been out of stock for four years now
>>
Smallrig AP-100 thoughts?

File: DSC09342)b.jpg (971 KB, 1165x1455)
971 KB
971 KB JPG
I photograph stuff, I'll post some stuff, first photos that I like, then portraits and other stuff.
96 replies and 57 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4303752
Imagine being this addicted to porn
>>
Do you publish these/make content of sorts?
>>
>>4303768
i dont make any sort of content, but i have an instagram page i opened around 2016 to post my photos
also sold a few prints to some friends who wanted them, but that's about it
>>
>>4302876
The boys looking hard AF
>>
>>4302848
nice

File: R0008017.jpg (2.49 MB, 1800x1440)
2.49 MB
2.49 MB JPG
been a long time guys, having a kid and a fucking meth-head crazy dog AND being an arborist climbing trees year-round doesn't give me much time to shoot anymore. Other than the 3 or 4 opportunities I'm given to go shoot, i just don't really want to anymore.

This will probably be the last time i post here, some of these are new, taken with my trusty old Ricoh Gr i got way back in 2015 (which i never ONCE dealt with the *dust* issue), some with my Nikon d750, and a few from my Samsung S10/Google Pixel 7 phones.

A lot of these are going to be old files I've either re-edited, or old RAWs i never got around to touching, and just recently gave them my best shot. I will also add a few photos i think are my absolute best (i will label them as such), feel free to shit on as many of them as hard as you want, ill bite the pillow and take it dry.

Anyways, its been a great 10 years on this god forbidden board, and even though gear faggotry never slowed (in fact, it got worse, thanks Sony) you guys were the ones that taught me everything i know. From taking and giving criticism, to techniques and genuinely great advice, i got it from here (i still miss Bass). Thanks guys, its been fun.

Anyways, feel free to post any old or recent lowlight/night shots you've taken. It doesn't have to be recent either, post night shots from years ago that you're the most proud of, id love to see.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeRICOH IMAGING COMPANY, LTD.
Camera ModelGR
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop 25.4 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)28 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width3987
Image Height3190
Number of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8
Pixel CompositionRGB
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2024:02:22 20:03:16
Exposure Time8 sec
F-Numberf/2.8
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating200
Lens Aperturef/2.8
Brightness-6.7 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length18.30 mm
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
Image Width1800
Image Height1440
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
SharpnessNormal
195 replies and 116 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4286767
creepy alien vibes

>>4286788
I like the lighting and colors here but this should be perspective corrected I think

>>4286829
really nice lighting here.

>>4286830
creepy but the sky wasnt this red right?

>>4286840
cool lighting


Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>
File: fixed.jpg (1.52 MB, 1351x1781)
1.52 MB
1.52 MB JPG
>>4286788

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
>>
File: DSCF8777.jpg (433 KB, 2048x1365)
433 KB
433 KB JPG


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareCapture One 22 Macintosh
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Width2048
Image Height1365
>>
File: DSCF8571.jpg (895 KB, 2048x1365)
895 KB
895 KB JPG
>>4304671

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareCapture One 22 Macintosh
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Width2048
Image Height1365
>>
File: DSCF8578 1.jpg (664 KB, 2048x1365)
664 KB
664 KB JPG
>>4304672

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareCapture One 22 Macintosh
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Width2048
Image Height1365

File: _DSF5347.jpg (1.09 MB, 1100x1100)
1.09 MB
1.09 MB JPG
Hi /p/, it's been a while. I've worked on a lot of projects over the last few years, but this one is still ongoing. Let me know what ya think.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop 23.5 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width4000
Image Height4000
Number of Bits Per Component16, 16, 16
Compression SchemeUncompressed
Pixel CompositionRGB
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Image Data ArrangementChunky Format
Image Created2023:04:28 21:27:08
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1100
Image Height1100
29 replies and 16 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
I'm a noob so ignore everything I'll say
Comfy stuff but I'm not taking away much from it I guess
>>4303245 really dig this one though
>>
>>4303244
interesting
>>4303245
nice composition
>>4303246
yes
>>4303252
yes
>>4303256
no, faggot

pretty decent /p/-tier photos. good job op
>>
I can see talent, nonetheless most of it is BORING. Keep on trying.
>>
>>4303240
Love this one,
>>
>>4303240
Boring snapshits of your walk.

File: dc.jpg (338 KB, 1920x1080)
338 KB
338 KB JPG
I was watching an old hd tv program from the 90s and it just looks gorgeous. What's the secret? Can we even replicate it now?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1920
Image Height1080
60 replies and 17 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4303210
Alternatively:
1. Buy the shittest toy lens you can find and put it on an APS-C body
2. Stop down to like f/11 and never properly focus on any one thing
3. Shoot interlaced video at 24 fps / 1/40 shutter speed
4. Compress the video and take a screenshot
>>
>>4301842
Try to find a CCD camera with a small sensor or a tube camera. They'll be using some obscure and hard to find storage format so have fun spending a fortune on that.
If you're broke and don't want to spend time rummaging through your towns thrift shop, your best bet would be to look for filters that do the chromatic aberration and the soft edges. However, the shallow dynamic range and color style is hard to replicate with modern cameras because the sensors are just too good, so you'll be doing that part in post.
>>
>>4303307
tube camera? like extension tube?
>>
>>4303835
vacuum tube
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Video_camera_tube
>>
>>4301842
it has unusual depth of field and subject separation. it's probably a large sensor. the colors look kind of funky because it has weird vibrance, saturation, and looks like there is a low bit depth.

as someone else said, it does kind of look like a CCD sensor. Idk anything about tube sensors.

it's a strange effect. the grass and sky seem to have a good dynamic range, but the building and bushes seem like they have a low color depth.

File: pc-60.png (1 MB, 560x460)
1 MB
1 MB PNG
• Theme: Money
• Deadline: From 14 April to 5 May

Theme:
• The submissions have to feature money, be about money or the lack of it

Rules:
• Photo must be taken during the timeline. Images taken before this thread was started won't count.
• Post images with exif, if possible. If you can't, just state that they were taken during the timeline.
• Three entries per photographer max.
• A day after the competition ends, all valid images will be posted for voting.

Optional:
• You're encouraged to post your images that fit the theme even if they're out of competition.
• You may name your images if you wish.

Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
1 reply and 1 image omitted. Click here to view.
>>
File: img.jpg (626 KB, 1528x2418)
626 KB
626 KB JPG
The long anticipated voting for challenge 57 "Windows" has begun
Everyone has up to 3 votes, so vote for the submissions you deem to be the best:
https://forms.gle/8NwuphmXr9q1mUT87

List of submissions (links not included since they are all broken):
1 "Tand Oost/Will it Rain/wtf bro" >>4278928
2 >>4279153
3 >>4279169
4 "Barneveldse Kraanverhuur" >>4282863
5 "Retiefstraat" >>4282868
6 "Reflection" >>4282888
7 "House of Glass" >>4283502
8 "#95" >>4283544
9 >>4284351
10 "Flower Shop" >>4284802

Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>
File: file_not_found.png (29 KB, 536x156)
29 KB
29 KB PNG
>>4304498
However looking back at the archive i saw this possible submission, which I had not downloaded before, and can't now.
I might have missed it somehow, or maybe the exif seemed off, but can't really check now since I don't have the file.
If someone has the photo saved, please send it so I could add it to the poll, if it turns out that i just missed it somehow
>>
File: DSC_1042 (Custom).jpg (1.85 MB, 4096x2734)
1.85 MB
1.85 MB JPG
Here's my snapshit

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATION
Camera ModelNIKON D3400
Camera Softwaredarktable 4.6.0
Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.4
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)75 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Image Created2024:04:15 14:12:17
Exposure Time1/4000 sec
F-Numberf/2.8
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating400
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModeCenter Weighted Average
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash
Focal Length50.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width6016
Image Height4016
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Gain ControlLow Gain Up
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
Subject Distance RangeUnknown
Image QualityRAW
White BalanceAUTO
Focus ModeAF-S
Flash Compensation0.0 EV
Flash Bracket Compensation0.0 EV
AE Bracket Compensation0.0 EV
Lens TypeUnknown
Lens Range50.0 mm; f/1.4
Shooting/Bracketing ModeSingle Frame/Off
Noise ReductionOFF
Camera Actuations2523
>>
File: img.jpg (378 KB, 1146x1878)
378 KB
378 KB JPG
Voting has challenge 58 "Morning" has also finally begun
Everyone has up to 3 votes, so vote for the photos you consider to be better than the rest:
https://forms.gle/DU9bgzGMstcCwbob9

Submissions:
1 >>4286049 https://i.4cdn.org/p/1708530283906597.jpg
2 "Morning Above Clouds" >>4287142 https://i.4cdn.org/p/1708708162524492.jpg
3 >>4289584 https://i.4cdn.org/p/1709295415977852.jpg
4 "Morning" >>4289610 https://i.4cdn.org/p/1709300528415214.jpg
5 "Nothing Ever Happened" >>4291881 https://i.4cdn.org/p/1709801221852432.png
6 >>4292957 https://i.4cdn.org/p/1710079646885351.jpg
7 >>4293147 https://i.4cdn.org/p/1710118682565701.jpg
8 "Arm Borne" >>4293223 https://i.4cdn.org/p/1710152839426669.jpg
9 >>4293566 https://i.4cdn.org/p/1710235778551963.jpg


Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>
File: pc-59-winner.png (513 KB, 594x548)
513 KB
513 KB PNG
And finally the winner by default of challenge 59 "Imitation" is
1 "Cabbage Leaf" >>4301227 https://i.4cdn.org/p/1712257513811080.jpg

Archive of the thread:
https://archived.moe/p/thread/4295821

Being European I know very little about American photographers, so thanks for the intro to Edward Weston

This is the most retarded shit I have ever read.
15 replies and 1 image omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4304335
Are da jooz in the room with us right now, anon?
>>
>>4304398
Who said anything about jews you fucking antisemite

G*d
>>
>>4304249
not reading that shit
>>
>>4304407
might hurt considering 99% of shitty amateurs (r)ape the new york school or new topographics, but it's truth. the 1% is just aping cinema.
>>
>>4304333
>He's articulated very succinctly a disdain for the rudimentary.

thanks big brian. you must have experience huffing matza farts. I do appreciate your words, but the critic is obviously some type of highfalutin cunt.

File: youknowit.jpg (45 KB, 500x500)
45 KB
45 KB JPG
TWENTY-FOUR - FIFTY - ONE HUNDRED AND THIRY-FIVE is the way to go AND YOU KNOW IT!
53 replies and 10 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
File: 20221011_042347.jpg (3 KB, 100x100)
3 KB
3 KB JPG
24-70
70-200
200-600
>>
40mm
85mm
135mm

Simple as
>>
Why does no one here like UW? It's my favorite focal range when I can make it work.
>>
File: uxZvLQ.gif (1.78 MB, 480x360)
1.78 MB
1.78 MB GIF
>>4302433
18mm pancake with fixed f8 is all you need
>>
>>4304476
OP agrees.

File: 1691916029178259.jpg (10 KB, 259x195)
10 KB
10 KB JPG
Why people frown upon it?
83 replies and 4 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4304360
>Doing anything manually makes people think they're really photographers and more skilled.
>>
File: Nikon-FA-3-2223555333.jpg (75 KB, 1080x672)
75 KB
75 KB JPG
>>4297696
Fuckin neeerds hate seeing SPASM on their cameras bc they want to think of making image as being some exercise in purity. I love it. I shoot on programmed automagic all the time, jpg never raw, and throw out every third image just for lulz bc I'm ken fuckin rockwell and I am a goddamn photo theory arsonist.

Just don't use P you dorks, A is useful, S for those instances (you know em), B when you really need to get jiggy wit it. M when you just need to set A & S & want to fuck up your shit with some crazy fucking iso and make a pointillist painting out of your image because why not.

This shit is sophisticated AF. Matrix metering, AIS, SPASM, this thing is practically magic.
>>
>>4304376
If you don't know how to shoot manual, it's okay, you can just say that.
>>
>>4297696
Because PASM is dogshit if you're not a subhuman wedding "photographer".
Auto is fine though.
>>
>>4304600
>Has a retarded gear opinion and brings up a vitriolic hatred of wedding photographers
Lemme guess, "just put A settings on every dial and make the camera look like a pentax k1000"
-Fujislug
-Leica lolcow
-Nikon Zfool
Call it

File: 897246789.jpg (112 KB, 667x1000)
112 KB
112 KB JPG
>bondage edition
are you a thick-neck chad or shoulderlet kind of strap guy?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeCanon
Camera ModelCanon EOS 60D
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.4 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Image Created2020:11:16 13:07:33
Exposure Time1/40 sec
F-Numberf/2.8
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating200
Lens Aperturef/2.8
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length40.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceManual
Scene Capture TypeStandard
18 replies and 4 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4304546
You could have always posted evidence of your extravagant wealth like your leica on the hood of your BMW in your 3 car garage but I have a feeling your dad doesn't let you in the garage
>>
>>4304549
like I'm going to run around my house taking pics of expensive stuff just because some poorfag is envious of my 80 dollar camera strap
hope the bus is at least airconditioned in whatever 3rd world hellhole you live
>>
>>4304551
>no, i dont even have a camera
protip, you can take a photo of your camera by setting it in front of a mirror.
>>
>>4304559
anon you might be retarded
>>
>>4304340

Strap!
The one in pic related is like 10€ on amazon. It's very comfortable because the rope is very thick.
The most important part is that it's very sturdy because all connections are megal.

>>4304508
It's not really abot dropping the camera. I like the strap because "sometimes" you need two hands and several lenses are not pocketable. I never carry my camera like this btw >>4304343

File: proll.jpg (446 KB, 1623x541)
446 KB
446 KB JPG
any photo posters

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS5 Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width1623
Image Height541
Number of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8
Pixel CompositionRGB
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution96 dpi
Vertical Resolution96 dpi
Image Created2014:07:25 10:17:08
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
Image Width1623
Image Height541
35 replies and 5 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
File: IMG_0279.jpg (1.16 MB, 2048x1365)
1.16 MB
1.16 MB JPG
>>4303362
"Nice to see you" on an expensive hotel. The irony is that they don't want to actually see you unless you have money

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeCanon
Camera ModelCanon EOS RP
Camera SoftwareAdobe Lightroom 7.2 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.8
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Image Created2024:04:07 11:03:38
Exposure Time1/60 sec
F-Numberf/1.8
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating200
Lens Aperturef/1.8
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
FlashNo Flash
Focal Length50.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>
>>4298746
P
>>
>>4298746
Rolling
>>
>>4303363
try again commie retard
>>
>>4298746
rollesky

Alright, now is the time to buy.

Apparently hollywood is using soviet photo glass for movies now. Companies are rehousing them into film lenses.

Dune 2 was shot entirely on old Soviet glass.

I know the Helios m42 is legend. what else should I look at.

I am on L mount.
4 replies omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4304451
>If you have Hollywood money why would you not just buy an actual Jena Biotar at that point?
Nobody does professional-level rehousing of them. And also there are no so much copies of biotars on market (just a magic part of soviet economy when goods produced not because people need them, but to make peepo do something continuously)
>>
Why cant we have some helios 103's rehoused for M mount
>>
>>4304488
>Why cant we have some helios 103's rehoused for M mount
haven't people with eyes of cunts released it yet?
>>
>>4304488
Contax RF mount superiority proved once again
>>
>>4304451
>>4304467

yeah, there are millions of helios floating around. the re-housing company is in Ukraine, and I imagine building a company without a steady flow of available glass is pretty fucking hard.

people are getting some amazing results with them. I picked up a pretty fresh looking 44m-4 off of ebay for $60 wtih free shipping from bulgaria. excited.

I would recommend picking up a lens now while you can. there is a lot of chatter about these lenses.

My camera has been sitting in the corner for like for ever and I've finally decided to get into photography. However I don't know where to start: do you have any book or youtube channel to recommend in order to learn the basics? I would like to do mostly model like shootings
6 replies and 1 image omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4303150
This. Just play with the settings, shooting the same scene to watch it change, you do not need to read shit and most photographers are schizoid midwits so reading shit might confuse you

Proper education was for film, especially film with flash, and yes even then the best photographers learned by experimenting.
>>
>>4303409
>picture.with the problem
picture without the problem
>>
>>4303067
Have you already read and understood the owners' manual of your camera? Those tend to include basics and how to deal with it using that camera.
>>
>>4303079
That's probably the best book out there for learning photography. Read it, go out and take lots of pictures, then read it again.
>>
>>4303067
>book to learn the basics


people on this board will literally do anything but go outside and take photos

File: DSC02884.jpg (3.48 MB, 3648x2736)
3.48 MB
3.48 MB JPG
Cheap digicam photography?

Only started taking pics very recently on my parents' old Sony cam and I feel like I mog 90% of the posters here

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeSONY
Camera ModelDSC-S2000
Maximum Lens Aperturef/3.3
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2015:03:15 20:03:46
Exposure Time1/15 sec
F-Numberf/3.1
Exposure ProgramNormal Program
ISO Speed Rating400
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceDaylight
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length6.20 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width3648
Image Height2736
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceManual
Scene Capture TypeStandard
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
29 replies and 13 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4298240
Honestly people on this board are a bit shit at photography. OP's not mogging anyone with this but I got some 1970s and 1980s Nat Geos and they do mog the fuck out of almost everything I see online. Documentarian but full of style and beauty. It's insane how fun it is to flip through them and just look at the photography. I genuinely think almost no one knows how to take interesting photos anymore (at least for nature, I don't seek out much other photography). Is this a side effect of digital? Or are we all just dead inside now?
>>
>>4304085
Side effect of everyone already seeing everything a million times and not doing enough drugs
>>
>>4304085
>photographers that travel but not JUST to take pictures
These people are basically extinct

Taking photos walking your fuckin dog results in more honest work than a pointless “photowalk”. These people did not “do photography”. They were wide eyed journalists immersed with wonder rather than interns afraid of running afoul of state censors and old boomers doing it for the paycheck.
>>
File: dt_CRW_2028.jpg (1.2 MB, 2052x1524)
1.2 MB
1.2 MB JPG


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeCanon
Camera ModelCanon DIGITAL IXUS 960 IS
Camera Softwaredarktable 4.6.1
Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.9
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)36 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Image Created2024:04:15 15:02:16
Exposure Time451/250000 sec
F-Numberf/2.9
Exposure ProgramNormal Program
ISO Speed Rating74
Lens Aperturef/2.9
Exposure Bias0 EV
Subject Distance12.46 m
Metering ModePattern
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length7.70 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width2052
Image Height1524
>>
>>4298229
>i feel like i mog 90% of users here

that's because 90% of users here take photos of nothing


[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.