2025 Halloween in Itaewon and Hongdae, Korea10/31~11/1Out of focus edition1/100And if you have some from the halloween you would like to share, please do.
>>4481974>This fuckin trailer trash loser shitting up the thread with his lusty jewish fantasies againI've been on the internet since 1991 and I've never seen someone who isn't a jew have such a hot hard boner for jewish culture before, omgPhotography, chemistry, optiks, higher math, microprocessors, digital sensors, statistical data processing, all jewish conspiracies.Anon should ditch this jewish perversion and go back to the pinnacle his own pure bloodlines technological innovation of drawing in the sand with a stick. lol what a retarded fuck
>>4482658>scorching callout of jewish slave ownership (the torah and talmud allow and encourage slavery lol)>uhhhh you’re mad because jews invented thingsBut no they didn’tThey weren’t really essential to anything. Their intellects are not exceptional. The average IQ of ashkenazi is exactly 100. Every jew in the world could be replaced with some other perfectly average race and nothing would change. But if enough were still the same swapped race, those people would be nepotists with regards to employment and college admissions instead. Jews are totally unremarkable people outside of their evil religion and nepotism. Neither superior nor inferior and once removed from judaism and spared from circumcision, generic.
ITT: Proof that globalism SUCKSIf I wanted to see that many white people I would simply walk outside and save myself a 13 hr flight.
why do you guys all not like ken rockwell?he seems cool and his photos are prettyi dont get itplus he has good advice on his web-sitemaybe we can appreciate him in this thread?that would be nicei will post my favourite ken rockwell photographs
>>4480999>kurwa>superior photographer>
>>4480405lmao true, I went to Engineering School and ended up being a photographer.
>>4482316Don't you be talking about my little man like that
>>4482964Ken literally made this meme
It's pretty good
>>4482922New epstein files dropped anonHe’s gayer than obama and overcompensates with the straight guy act.
>>4472742POV you're bubba.>It's pretty goodThats what bubba said too
>>4472742This is better.Infamous(SELECT WORKS)2019“Infamous” is an exhibition imbued with the patina of tainted history. It tells a story of infamy with varying degrees of bigotry and insensitivity. Although we want to believe that what happened in the past stays in the past, history proves us wrong. There will always be new victims to attack and marginalize, new scapegoats to replace the old ones proving that Man's inhumanity to Man has no limits. We can choose to look the other way but it doesn't make it any better. Included in this work is a portrait of one of the most infamous figures of the 21st century. History is not a pretty picture. It rarely is. Warning: Contains graphic content.
>>4483022No matter how they try to aggrandize him, he still looks like a turd splattered on a painting.
>>4482887>>4482888>>4482889He looks like he shit himself.
at what age and how did you find that you were into photography/videography?
>>4476808I live in a town city (a town that over my life industrialized into a city). This town city is located in foothills, the hills are a 100 km away. Where my house is, from the ceiling you can see Mount Kanchenjunga in clear winter days, with the smaller hills always being visible on any clear day. Also parts of my town are still pretty rural, there were more, but is become less now. Being in such a place of different aesthetics, whenever i visited the hills, i wished to capture it, same for the rural areas. One fine winter day 6 years ago, i got to see Mount Kanchenjunga in pristine clarity, at that moment i decided that my smartphone was not enough and i finally picked up my dads dslr. Have learnt the basics, still a noob. I really appreciate the masters before me and their techniques. Visting this board and studying up techniques and post process has made me appreciate this art much more. It has also increased my scope from just hills. Photography is one of the few things that gives me genuine happiness.
>>4482917>you can see Mount Kanchenjunga in clear winter days,In your area the is much to shoot. Beautiful part of the world
>14 years. old start taking photos of random shit on my dad's 4mp bridge camera. gives me his ae-1 and I start taking photos of my friends skateboarding >15 years old. friends are way better than me at skateboarding and I can't skate the spots so i start to just hangout and shoot photos instead
>>4476808When I was in my teens back in the late 90s my old man designated me the family photographer with his ae1 lol. It’s been an on and off relationship since then. But it’s one of those things that even if I stop for months or years I always eventually come back around. Like RuneScape lol
>>4476808I took a photo of my grandpa when I was seven. It looked good with him and the background.I realised that I had an eye for a photo in my 20s. Never had a camera until I got a smartphone when I was 32, and I became a snapshitter extraordinaire. Sadly, my attempts to parlay that into IG success and possibly an income failed miserably after persisting for four years, now I just snapshit when I'm at the park each Saturday in one of my rare times outside.
I am going to buy one as soon as they hit the market in early Novemeber. I hope I get the 1987 edition. It's fire. Which one are you hoping to score?You are going to be getting one right /p/?You aren't gonna be a contrarian try hard no Charmera /p/haggot are you /p/? ISHYDDT
>>4481684So this is a fashion accessory that happens to take shit photos. Very woman like, fitting.
>>4481637>>4481638>no viewfinder
>>4481694Most of the people buying it already have a camera, give it a rest.
>>4481638Hah I saw these on sale at Best Buy for $15 CAD last week. These Vivitars are much worse than the Charmera, sadly. The native resolution on the Vivitar is 320x240, upscaled to 14MP. At least the Charmera has an honest resolution of 1.6MP (1440x1080).
>November 15th>Still no Charmeras in stock anywhereLife is suffering.
I have way better gear but this little fucker has become a great companion for vlogging, even with all the drawbacksDo you have a favorite flawed piece of gear?
>>4476353Frame counter is probably busted
The quality is shit but the audio is great
Kodak ZI8.
>>4483068Man, that takes me back. Remember when Flip cameras were all the rage for what, two or three years there, before “smartphones” really took over? I had a Kodak one that had jelly video like crazy but it could do 720p! Used it quite a bit lol.
>>4483080The ZI8 had a few advantages over the Flip>1080p instead of 720p>Used SD cards instead of internal memory>Mic jack>Image stabilization (whatever that consisted of)I remember I had a "rig" for mine that consisted of a cheap "L" bracket with a couple of cold-shoe mounts that I used for the mic and for an external light. Yeah, it was an interesting time. Smartphones were around, but they hadn't completely taken over. And even then, the cameras on them were just "okay." So to get full HD in something that fit in your pocket AND was under $200 was pretty cool.
birds edition
>>4481358grrr you take that back!! you dummy i'll show you someday!!
>>4481356there is no quarter frame lens in the world that will capture that much detail
I got a gh1 because I fell for some meme about it being "cinematic, well that was bullshit but I like the pictures it takes. And it's feels very low noise compared to MFT I've had before
>>4483013I'm a retard and forgot to commentLumix GX80Olympus 45mm f/1.810mm macro ring
This thread is dedicated to close-range photographic captures utilising macro-optical imaging configurations to achieve greater reproduction ratios. Got it? Good now upload some shit. Last thread: >>4376661
fuji x-t5030 mm macro
>>4482895
>>4482896
>>4482895Looks amazing
>>4482867I use an Olympus 30mm. Has a maximum magnification of 1.25:1 in the M4/3 format
The worst part of photography school is paying for the fees, but the facilities and tutors are really good where I am. I might drop out after I get what I want out of it. It forced me to learn how to photograph and meter properly, use composition, understand lighting, and edit in post-production—all things that amateurs struggle with because they can’t ask a professional for tips.
>>4482865What about you post pictures instead of bitching about /p/ and being a loser?
>>4482891I want to have a career instead of being a hobbyfag like you
>>4482893>I'm doing it for my mental health because I have paranoid schizophrenia and need art therapy.>I want to have a career instead of being a hobbyfag like youpretentious lying fag still haven't posted any pics of your catalog. Something tells me that it'll be some street shit
>>4482904Here. Critique it all you want. I am trying to get better.Wanting a career and doing it for therapy aren't mutually exclusive but I guess I have cognitive dissonance over what I want to do. I just want to get good at photography, and that is it.
>>4482908Meh it's ok honestly, the top left is too empty, you could've shopped the cloud to put it up so you would have a symmetry of the cloud around the cross-pigeon axis. The position of the pigeon is nice you can clearly tell it's taking off from the cross and gives a sensation of leaving the frame. Of course there's the angel symbolism but that's overdone and the bird is a pigeon. For the colour grading it's not bad but the eye and feet of the bird are almost purple and orange. The grains help a lot to give this religious style, I'm sure a smooth version would not be pleasant to watch. Honestly good picture just not that interesting / deep.
Rank the Trump Portraits
>>4475946Authoritarians are good and the heckin american way is dysfunctional garbage that’s already killed the country permanently and on a genetic level, but they must first be SMART authoritarians, like xi. Not orange putin.
>>44321141342 (doubt this is a portrait tho, the lighting sucks)
>>44792762 was his official portrait for the first term, and it sucks. Good thing he won again or else he would be stuck looking like that for eternity.
>>4475946>did get my jabsKWAB
>>44321141 looks cheap, background is real bad2 is bland but inoffensive3 has some of the worst lighting choices I have seen in my life4 is trying way too hardSo I guess2>1>4>3None of them are good.
How do I get over the fear of using my camera in public? I got a fancy camera but I've never taken any shots with it because I'm too scared to go outside with it and use it
Want a cheatcode? Wear hi-vis. Grab a hi-vis yellow shirt, hoodie, or even a vest. Bonus pints if you get a few dirt or grease stains on it. People are so conditioned to ignore anyone wearing hivis that its basically urban camouflage.
I'm practically a bit new at photography myself.I sometimes struggle with this even though I know in my mind nobody really gives a fuck.I'm unattractive, skinnyfat and not exactly a looker. But it's only when my hair is really unkempt that I seem like a threat to anyone. Recently I had to visit a friend and her neighbor thought I was a rapist. She was following every anti-rapist rule in the book. Kinda bummed me out.Anyways I never try to focus or point at anyone directly. I believe it's better to practically advertise that I'm using a camera rather than try to hide it from people. I try to hold the camera at a level that it's obvious that I'm holding a camera essentially, and that I'm taking pictures. The results are that most of the time people don't give a fuck, once I got a few looks, once I captured plenty of people looking in my general direction because I decided to go for that rather than lose a shot. About once or twice I actually got asked to take a few pictures. So not everyone wants photographers (or people like me who are just getting into it I guess) to fuck themselves. It might seem like that because smartphones exist, and most people are retarded and think they replaced cameras completely. So it's not like everyone's walking around with a camera not attached to a phone. It does however get much easier if you have company. I guess like almost anything really. You bring a friend and it's much easier to just pop out the camera and take pictures of fucking everything. But good luck with that thing, having friends.
>>4456717Personally, I am struggling with the same thing and it all started with me being raped. I’m not afraid to say it. I drive a mobility scooter, and I was taking photos late at night and got invited to a party at an immigrant housing project and I don’t speak Somali so I thought they were all being friendly. They carried me up the stairs, leaving my scooter in the lobby. For the next several days, I was raped by multiple men, and I found out afterwards that they were renting me out for sex very cheap. My mobility scooter was stolen, but I luckily got a new one. After this, I was afraid of going out at night and started photographing at schools. Which got me into legal problems. But I’m working on myself to get my confidence back.
I noticed when taking pictures out there with some people around that they will just fuck off.I'm pointing my camera at a building, a set of stairs, whatever the fuck, and all I will get is "whoops sorry I'll move out of the way". Yesterday I was taking a picture of a random building and this cute lady just passed by quickly while crouching as if I would even give a fuck about accidentally taking a shot when all I'm doing is pointing at something that's not going to move. For as much as I dread getting someone angry at me because I took a picture of them without my permission, I don't exactly like having people apologize to me for walking, I don't own the streets.
>>4475841I love taking photos of subjects with people around. I like to pretend I am focusing on a building above, then take a quick shot when I lower the camera to make sure I have people, and continue looking up for 2 seconds and move out.
Okay so in short, I'm part of a horticultural society that has a yearly photo contest. The voting for the contest recently ended a couple of days ago but the winners won't be announced for a while. I want your opinion on the entrants to the contest. I'm not going to tell you which are mine, because I don't want your bias to taint your analysis. I will tell you that 6 of the 34 pictures are mine, so feel free to guess which are mine. I do have a fairly consistent style. Here's the images: https://www.ahsregion4.org/photos/PhotoContest/2025/2025_R4-Cat_1-Single_and_Multiple_Blooms-no_names.pdf
>>4477397Are the winners announced yet?
>>4477399No, they'll be announced in the next Region 4 newsletter.
>>4477406When will that be?
>>4477343I like the 18th one the most.
What is everyone's least favorite picture from those 34? I wanna see something.
#1post ur clouds edition
>>4482722This shits me so much.>Wow this looks like a good photo better get the camera out>BUT it isn't good enough to stop the car and spend an extra 120 seconds of my day to make it look actually decent
>>4482741>IMG23058 — Pentax K-1, HD PENTAX-D FA* 70-200mm F2.8 ED DC AW @ 180.0mm f16.0 1_500s, ISO 250.jpgit's internal zoomI almost certainly just left the rear cap off while I vacuumed or something at some point recently, first time I've seen dust there
>>4464658This picture would be golden if there was only a tree line instead of a house on the right side.
>>4465726Enjoying this one.
>>4466687This pic is fire
How do you sell a photo for over a million dollars?
>>4482685>>4482683>just go be a politicianThe thing is people don't have to listen to your impotent crying. Muh beauty is something different to everyone until a set of shared values aka ideology lends it objective weight.
>>4482698Faggot go on a hike.
>>4482708You can't build anything on primordial force, if so then top predator animals would have kingdoms, and they do not
>>4482708>implying "go on a hike" is an insultkek
>>4482727As if kingdoms were built by fags like you and not warriors. Even if it was true what's your point ? Are you happier than cats or owls ?>>4482839Based retard, read between the lines you've missed the point
Do you develop and scan your own film or send it off to someone else? AT what point doe it become worth it to develop your own rolls rather than sending it to someone else?
I send my film to a local shop, they charge me only $1.5 (Colour)/$4 (B/W) and $6 for scanning (36 exp.) or $0.2 (colour)/$0.4 (B/W) for each print. I want to try to self develop my own film but the consumables are sometimes a bit difficult to get or quite expensiven in my country.
>$35 AUD to dev and scan one (1) roll of black and white film>Colour film cheaper to dev and scan (@ $29 per roll) but is counteracted by the fact colour film costs the difference so it's not any cheaper actually>a set of 6x4 prints is an extra $8 (wow le poverty size prints woo)>doesn't offer larger prints>they're just fucking digital prints of the scan>Okay it's like $8-12 a roll for black and white film if you buy in lots of 5/10. That's alright>Oh look there's these black and white films designed specifically to use C41 developement so you can use the cheaper colour printing we offer!>C41 black and white film is $25 a rollAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
>>4482738>$35 AUDWhat city?Go somewhere else or learn how to do it yourself. $35 is a scam
>>4482740>What city?Sydney. Granted I've only spoken to two shops, so my data might be skewed.>Go somewhere else or learn how to do it yourself. $35 is a scamYes I am >>4482315 anon and am in the process of DIY.
>>4482743I am in Melbounre, irohas photo are quick and cheap, scans the same day ikigai film lab do better scans but you pay more for it (you also can't pick up the negs, post only) , and the bloke is a bit of nutcase on ig
