What do you think of half frame cameras?I like the idea, 72 exposures from a single roll sounds awesome[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width660Image Height464Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>4340557I definitely want to get one at some point and keep it on me as my snapshitting camera
Isn't shooting half-frame like shooting with a crop-sensor digital camera? Imagine shooting a format having the worst characteristics of crop digital (narrow field of view, "focal length multipliers") and film (low actual resolution & sharpness, poor shadow detail, magnified grain, pain to develop & process)
>>4340995honestly they are as complex as a smena 8 so it shouldn't be too hard to repair, mine has been working fine for years>>4341314>72 is utterly absurdits a snapshitting/ triptych machineor just load it with 24 exposure film or something >>4341394>pain to develop & processthat is like, half the fun man[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeMinoltaCamera ModelScan Dual IICamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 8.2.1 (Windows)Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2023:03:26 20:22:29Color Space InformationsRGB
>>4341394Should have brought back aps-film then. aps cameras are essentially free, even from higher end brands.
>>4341394This misses the point of “I just like doing it and it’s fun”. Otherwise why are any of us using anything but phaseOne cameras?
Lots of nophotos on /p/. Let's see if they can nut up and post the shot that they currently are the most proud of. Any posts without your best photo are disregarded. Let's see what /p/ is made of.This is my fave 120 shot in Provia for now but I am working on something this year to try and outdo it. Feel free to discuss your gear if you must but you need to have your best photo. This is your chance to put your best foot forward and show what you are made of. Even if you only shoot with a phone. This thread should be VERY interesting too to. I have a feeling film shooters will come out on top based on the quality in the various generals. But we will see.Good luck!
>>4339997I really like this one, where was it taken?>>4335320nice>>4335168>>4335170>>4335171really cool, you have an insta?
I kinda dislike a lot of my photos, and the stuff I put the most effort into is just sports, but I guess in terms of proud, it'd be this, even though it got bumped a few mins in. 1hr on velvia 100 of the recent aurora australis, well the one in May[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.3.1 (Macintosh)Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2024:07:07 20:11:46Color Space InformationUncalibrated
>>4341416Thanks anon, yeah it's just my personal insta @ramanzolidoares don't expect anything mindblowing lmao
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATIONCamera ModelNIKON Z 6Camera Softwaredarktable 4.6.1Focal Length (35mm Equiv)49 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandImage Created2024:07:22 13:36:51Exposure Time1/100 secF-Numberf/5.6Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating320Exposure Bias0.7 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length49.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1919Image Height1080RenderingCustomExposure ModeManualScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlNoneContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknownImage QualityRAWWhite BalancePRESET1Focus ModeMANUALFlash SettingNORMALFlash Bracket Compensation0.0 EVAE Bracket Compensation0.0 EVLens TypeUnknownLens Range24.0 - 70.0 mm; f/4.0Shooting/Bracketing ModeSingle Frame/OffNoise ReductionOFFCamera Actuations10896
>>4341416Red Rocks, Denver CO>>4340194Thanks Anon, it's not the best camera in the world but I get a good shot every now and then. >>4340000 has to be my favorite so far. This butterfly is nice to, but the back wing seems out of focus.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS REBEL T2iCamera Softwaredarktable 4.8.0Lens Size55.00 - 250.00 mmFirmware VersionFirmware Version 1.0.9Serial Number-187164489Lens NameEF-S55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS IIImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandImage Created2024:07:25 14:05:38Exposure Time1/1000 secF-Numberf/5.6Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating400Lens Aperturef/5.7Exposure Bias0 EVFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length194.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width4845Image Height3460RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoScene Capture TypeStandardExposure ModeAv-PriorityFocus TypeAutoMetering ModePartialSharpnessUnknownSaturationNormalContrastNormalShooting ModeManualImage SizeUnknownFocus ModeOne-ShotDrive ModeContinuousFlash ModeOffCompression SettingUnknownMacro ModeNormalWhite BalanceAutoExposure Compensation3Sensor ISO Speed224Color Matrix129
This young man is the most technically gifted photographer of our time.His work is profound and his razor sharp quick thinking people skills make him the ultimate all round street photographer. If you disagree you are a massive fag.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAndroid UP1A.231005.007.G998BXXSAFXCLImage-Specific Properties:Image Width1270Image Height2208
is that rewiewbrah?
>>4341535Street photographers are bad by definition
>>4341535there's already a thread up faggot, buy an ad.
>>4341535Breddy gud b8
he's the last remaining real new yorker
post ur train/station/tracks pictures[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNORITSU KOKICamera ModelEZ ControllerCamera SoftwareEZ Controller 7.40.010 (210714)Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2024:02:20 13:51:08Color Space InformationsRGBImage Width3130Image Height2075
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATIONCamera ModelNIKON D750Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.4 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/4.4Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaColor Filter Array Pattern844Focal Length (35mm Equiv)85 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2024:07:21 23:49:27Exposure Time1/500 secF-Numberf/11.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating160Lens Aperturef/11.0Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModeOtherLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length85.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlNoneContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATIONCamera ModelNIKON D750Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.4 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/3.5Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaColor Filter Array Pattern844Focal Length (35mm Equiv)24 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2024:07:21 23:51:52Exposure Time1/1000 secF-Numberf/11.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating450Lens Aperturef/11.0Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length24.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlLow Gain UpContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationRight-Hand, TopHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width4032Image Height3024Scene Capture TypeStandard
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon PowerShot A590 ISCamera SoftwareRawTherapee 5.8Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.7Focal Length (35mm Equiv)35 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image Width3276Image Height2147Compression SchemeUncompressedPixel CompositionRGBImage OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Data ArrangementChunky FormatImage Created2022:01:10 08:26:18Exposure Time1953/250000 secF-Numberf/3.9Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating200Lens Aperturef/4.0Exposure Bias0 EVSubject Distance65.54 mMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length5.80 mm
>>4296251446/447 Series my beloved
Holy shit.Rollei is releasing a new film camera. Film is so back and I’m going to buy one.Rollei35afYou are buying one too right /p?Manual controls too so it’s not just a point and shoot. I am hyped.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiColor Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width1500Image Height2000Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>4338078>No technology nor material in it justify this priceIt's more justifiable than small sensored compacts being listed for hundreds.
>>4331899>You are buying one too right /p?Nah. I got the Pentax 17 and might pick up a FM3a to replace my aging SRT-101 that I've used since college.But there's no novelty to this Rollei for me at all.
>>4338245>(god I wish)What would you do if you were?
I loathe cameras that load the film in the opposite direction.
>>4341498You mean when it curls the film outwards? Yeah all nikons do that and its frustrating because they're god-tier in every other regard.
>shoot film because digital is too artificial, oversharpened and clinical, without any character>use a digital camera to "scan" film photos to post-process them and upload to social media
>>4340698What about boom-zoomers? Like 2000-2002, they still could grow up without internetHell, that's old enough to remember VHS
>>4341409They don't exist
>>4341414I am one
>>4341415They are not on 4chan, they gave kids
>>4330819I fucked your mother and it was awful
I know Euros had a bunch of makers in the 20th century but not so many stuck around. What happened?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:
>>4339664>they make lenses with the same quality standards as leica, for the same mount, which doesn't really mean muchHey, same quality as Leica for a tenth of the price is pretty damn good.
>>4339192but japan already dominated the camera industry since like the 80s
>>4339120Because their flag looks like a camera from the front
>>4341265>from the frontBut it looks the same from the back too.
>>4341281how do you know that, amerifat?
>I wish they would make slimmer DSLRs>if you want it to be slimmer, you have to go mirrorless!!!>meanwhile these existWhy are people fucking lying to me? They could have made dslrs smaller if they wanted to. Nothing about the mirror box makes a camera big
>>4341355based>>4341357gigabased
>>4341341>a worthless feature>a crutch for bad photographersI don't care if it's useful to you, it takes space to do. You are losing track of the discussion here.>>4341355>With a film transport system, reflex mirror and pentaprism vs. a sensor, circuit board and miniature LCD screen.The film transportation system is smaller than what's required for a sensor and circuit board, the latter being required on a DSLR anyway.>So can phones.Because they don't have mirrors and reflex.>Only because of mechanical limitations.Mechanical limitations that allow the size to be smaller dummy.
>>4341367>The film transportation system is smaller than what's required for a sensor and circuit boardIncorrect; a sensor and its support circuitry can be less than a quarter inch thick.>Because they don't have mirrors and reflexIt still proves that video recording capability doesn't necessitate a thick body.>Mechanical limitations that allow the size to be smaller dummyAlso incorrect; mechanics have always been more limiting with regard to size than microelectronics.
>>4341368>Incorrect; a sensor and its support circuitry can be less than a quarter inch thick.lmfao sure>It still proves that video recording capability doesn't necessitate a thick body.You thinking a phone video and a full frame video would require the same body tells me everything I need to know here.>Also incorrect; mechanics have always been more limiting with regard to size than microelectronics.Stupid argument, that would be true if the microelectronics were doing the same thing. You're missing the point. Your original comparison was completely stupid because the cameras do vastly different things.
>>4341375>lmfao sureHow thick do you think "smartphones" are?>a phone video and a full frame video would require the same bodyIt depends on the resolution, downsampling method, frame rate and several other factors as to whether it could be done. >the cameras do vastly different thingsThey capture images projected from an optical array, as all cameras do.
What is this aesthetic called? It's like post apocalyptic, bunker, radio/computer equipment, maps, compases, blue-hour kinda aesthetic. Post more if you can pleaseSorry if i shouldn't have posted this here
Friends of mine in college removed a bunch these water and food canisters, at the owners permission, from a bunch of old buildings that had "civil defense" fallout shelters in the basements. They make cool trashcans. Allegedly some of the food in them exploded when you lit on fire, but I did not witness.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeFUJIFILMCamera ModelFinePix S3000Camera SoftwareDigital Camera FinePix S3000 Ver1.00Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaMaker Note Version0130Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2008:08:03 16:31:47Exposure Time1/60 secF-Numberf/2.8Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating100Lens Aperturef/2.8Brightness-2.0 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashFlash, AutoFocal Length6.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width800Image Height1137RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknownSharpnessNormalWhite BalanceAutoChroma SaturationNormalFlash ModeAutoMacro ModeOffFocus ModeAutoSlow Synchro ModeOffPicture ModeAutoContinuous/Bracketing ModeOffBlur StatusOKFocus StatusOut of FocusAuto Exposure StatusOK
>>4341129>>4341154>nogunz>nophoto
>>4341358Wrong on both counts.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS-1DSCamera SoftwareMicrosoft Windows Photo Viewer 6.1.7600.16385Serial Number0000113240Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2024:02:06 21:38:01Exposure Time1/250 secF-Numberf/8.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating200Lens Aperturef/8.0Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo FlashFocal Length55.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width2704Image Height4064RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandard
>>4341360That perspective is perfect, set that up again and then squeeze the trigger.
>>4341362I try not to dry fire it.
Just posting some of my pics, all taken with a game boy camera in the past month, feel free to join if you got game boy camera pics
>>4340649Cute, what’s his name?
>>4340808Dave
Anyone tried making a Game Boy Camera M?
>>4341064I would love to make something like that but it also sounds like it's a massive effort
This was so fucking cool thanks OP, even got my wife Akemi Homura
my holidays with the RB67 I'll post some more[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera ModelEZ ControllerCamera SoftwareAdobe Lightroom 9.4.2 (Android)Equipment MakeNORITSU KOKIImage-Specific Properties:Image Width3307Image Height3347Image Created2024:07:22 19:53:29Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
>>4340232awful lol
>>4341044>>4341060no problems anons. The post I made from the non cropped one is there >>4340206 but as I said the original size is like 24Mb and here it's limited to 5Mb so I guess it's like 5 times better irl ? but I think it depends on how good is the compression. irl 67 pictures look amazing and if it's on slide film you can feel it directly it's even better but fucking expensive...
>>4341073I think its pog
>>4341168Based turtleposter
>>4341168Yeah those look a bit better. Your tomboy is going to cheat on your with me if I see her.
If I'm a clueless beginner is the Z5 enough for me or I'm better off in the long run buying a Z6ii? The latter I can get for 500 eur more, would that money be better spent on a lens for the z5?
>>4339632>>4341200>https://archived.moe/p/search/filename/IMG_%2A_proc.jpg/searched up your filename pattern in the archive, a lot of what i assume is yours also just looks absolutely gorgeous. exactly my style of photography. unfortunately doesn't seem to be archived.
>>4341211>unfortunately doesn't seem to be archived.nevermind, found full images at archive.palanq.winwonder why archived.moe doesn't redirect there[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelEOS R3Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution1 dpVertical Resolution1 dpExposure Time1/800 secF-Numberf/5.6ISO Speed Rating200Focal Length300.00 mmColor Space InformationUncalibrated
>>4341200>this is the first actually good photograph i've seen in a long time here>>4341211>a lot of what i assume is yours also just looks absolutely gorgeousI'm humbled as fuck, bros. >>4341200>catbox unscaled and uncompressed jpg pleaseFuck it, here's a raw file:https://files.catbox.moe/j3z4ei.CR3
>>4339632>>4341228>magick.exe .\j3z4ei.CR3 -rotate "-90" -quality "93" .\picrel.jpg(ImageMagick 7.1.1-35)thank you!
>>4341228found my way to your instagram and unsplash, and same story there. fantastic stuffin case you happen to have a monero (preferred) or bitcoin wallet, i'll put money where my mouth is and bid 1 USD for each unscaled and uncompressed or raw version of these:https://archive.palanq.win/p/thread/4154066/#4158581https://archive.palanq.win/p/thread/4227448/#4230227https://archive.palanq.win/p/thread/4236176/#4237835https://archive.palanq.win/p/thread/4250793/#4253356https://archive.palanq.win/p/thread/4255144/#4257376https://archive.palanq.win/p/thread/4294923/#4296151https://archive.palanq.win/p/thread/4323443/#4325519https://archive.palanq.win/p/thread/4328250/#4340788https://archive.palanq.win/p/thread/4339589/#4339625totalling 9 USD
in the Hi-Fi world we know lot's of brands that most people never hear about and yet they are the often the best, are there any of those in camera making?
>>4337640Sinar makes the best monorail view camera system.
>>4337643>Koetsu>thinking koetsu carts are "high-end" because they're expensivengmithen again they don't exist anymore
>>4337744>heritage brand bought by the chinks?Directly? Hasselblad.Indirectly? Both Zeiss and Leica. You'll find "Leica" lenses on Huawei phones and "Zeiss" on Oppo phones.At least Angenieux hasn't been riced yet.
Let me guess... you need more
>>4337858agfa
Why thiis otherwise decent piece of shoftware can't have a decent file browser with a good size preview images, now I either have to live with thumbnails or a zoomed 100% crop of partial image.I mean, a ribbon of tumbnails with selected image above or below in decent size shouldn't be *that* hard to implement.
>>4340622>you want to open A File? no. you don't want thathuh?anyways i think op means he wants a larger view in lightroom equivalent of rawtherapee
Darktable is the best RAW converter.
>>4341120Eggy has been using it for over a decade and still can't get good colors from it.
>>4341118legitimately a windows workaround since it breaks entirely on *nix and even on windows darktable still adds a whole new roll and library for single images opened that way
>>4341206All this talk about these inferior janky “alternatives” to Lightroom just make me more bitter about Apple killing aperture. it could handle all this just fine and was legitimately better than Lightroom a decade ago. Faggots.
Old >>4260419[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakesamsungCamera ModelSM-G985FCamera SoftwareSnapseed 2.0Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.0Focal Length (35mm Equiv)28 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2024:03:01 08:21:15Exposure Time1/306 secF-Numberf/2.0Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating50Lens Aperturef/2.0Brightness6.8 EVExposure Bias-0.6 EVMetering ModeSpotFlashNo FlashFocal Length5.90 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1366Image Height910Exposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoDigital Zoom Ratio3Scene Capture TypeStandardUnique Image IDR64LLMF05VM
>>4334644>sensor size is what actually delivers better image qualitylol no, you can put REAL glass infront of those sensors and still end up with way better results than you would with whatever plastic optics phones come with these daysits less about the sensor size and moreso the quality of optics itself
>>4340668Sensor size is extremely important. Even mft doesnt do as well with a zeiss otus as full frame with the same mp count and it is much larger with larger photosites and a larger diffraction limited aperture than a phoneWhy? sensor size is what should increase vs decreasing pixel size to have as much resolution as film (20-30mp). Yes sensor size increases total light gathered and the de chart is the same for any resolutionBut smaller pixels have more noise which creates more errors when xtrans/bayer demosaics. Even if the SNR is the same colors look worse. with appropriately sized photosites phones would have less than a megapixel and mft would top out at 10mp
>>4340719Mhmm. It's why people start getting confused when you start discussing pixel size and density on sensor. It's part of the reason 50MP phones are just "big number = better" without any regard to the actual quality of the photo.
>>4340668>its less about the sensor size and moreso the quality of optics itselfAnd larger image planes are less demanding of their optics, for the same resolution.
>>4340719binning helps with noise a lot, and having large pixels without binning makes noise a bigger problem
