itt: post your non-standard color photos. your lomo turquoise, your harman red, your aerochrome, and all the like. I guess if you do weird stuff with your digital sensors that's fine too.shot a roll of kono donau II last weekend, its a blue monochromatic c-41 film rated at ISO 8.
Trying to replicate aerochrome sooc with my a6000 with the IR filter removed. Using flash gels behind the lens to get the colours
>>4526562
>>4526564
>>4526562>>4526564>>4526565I'd say great job
DigitalSima Soft Focus
why do stock photos always have this ugly neutral, super low contrast look? does it have a name? I call it the 'unsplash look', but I don't know why this is so popular. it looks cheap and it is not eye-catching at all.
>>4524460That's what poorly exposed/developed film looks like. Mirrorlesscucks are basically ferrets, they have a tendency to collect trash.
>>4523808>Backlit>Obvious flare>Poor lightingThe photographers are shit. That's your common denominator.
>>4523808Because this>Bro my camera has uhhh dynamic range look at this chart it's 0.8 better at dynamic range>*drags shadow slider up*>full frame is for low light bro why even buy it if you're not gonna shoot at f2 iso 12800 or push shadows 6 stops>*e/c -2*
>>4523810>canon cock deep in the mouth
>>4523808You just know...
What are your favorite modern photographers that you follow on insta, flickr, blogs? I want to follow some more work of others but all the popular ones that come up always are those influencer promoting their gear that they change every month. Many years ago I really liked Takashi Yasui's photos but damn they aged badly.
>>4525741lol what are you talking about what did he do besides post neat pics and vids?
>>4524993>What are your favorite modern photographers that you follow on instagoth whores with huge tits
>>4525049holy fuck that's some pretentious photoslop
>>4525890How'd you get them to follow you?
>>4525891this. fucking cringed lol
https://strawpoll.com/7MZ0kRk7rgo
>>4524104Ah, a pentax Q enjoyer.
>>4524123kek, obviously Pentax Q is what I meant :^)>http://www.photocritic.org/articles/pentax-q-s1-announcement>Is the new Pentax Q-S1 all fur coat and no knickers?
So I guess no one wants to participate and this was all for nothing? If so I'll let the thread die!
>>4526045I don't get what this thread is even meant to be.Why would anyone enter as the hacker known as four chan, instead of under their own bame?
>>4526045Didn't even realize it was here, i swear i never saw it in the catalogue
>>4524969nikon is the white man's camera - they take it to the mooncanon shoots niggerballpoetic
>>4503460>>4503843>>4503844>>4504020Taken on gopros btw
>>4503341They also approved omega watches "swiss" (actually chinese) made. I laughed when I saw the vid of the astronaut having to repair his own fucking watch in space because omega is fucking shit.
>>4525856your mother is fucking shit fucking rolex nigger
>>4507655That's exactly what I have. It'll be a major upgrade from an old APS-C DSLR in every way, most notably in terms of high ISO performance and IBIS. Also the 24-120mm is a great lens. I would recommend that you purchase the 40mm f/2 in addition to it. Those two combined are the perfect travel combo. Buy the 50mm f/1.8 S if you fancy having an exceptionally sharp lens.
Do you consider political portraiture as art?
of course. why wouldnt i?
Yeah why not for example the Che guevara photograph , That had been sold for millions of time now.
>>4526054Playing little hitler with what is and isn't art is a very exhausting and ultimately unwinnable task.
>>4526054Propaganda and advertising are forms of applied art. Including political photography. So yes.
does he still hold up in 2026?
>>4523841J in JEW is for JPEG
>>4525889What's the EW for?
>>4525933The average reaction to seeing a Jew
>>4525889JPEG stands for Jewish Plan to Exterminate Goyim
>>4525889JEWPEGGED
I am going to post random images I made which I have also edited and I would love my /p/iss bros to give me feedback on my composition, but mostly editing style... or direct me towards an editing style that would fit me.>feedback on composition>feedback on editing>direct my towards my own styleStarting with opening image...
>>4502387I made this picture better. I think I improved a little also in my editing skills.
>>4519436Here something new on my travels. Since then I feel like I have taken enough photos and have been chilling since. Photo gear is collecting dust. Want to travel again, this time to northern Poland or even Prag (in August). Still unsure, due to the temperature, which just takes the fun out of sight seeing.(pic related taken on same Island)
>>4519438
bump
A photograph is simply a photon's recorded wave function. It ripples through spacetime and is possible due to it being electromagnetic fields. Digital cameras treat its fields like a solar panel would. Why it act like this is in order for a photon to get its wave function quantization exist. So all in all it is just the energy of quantization. Possible due to the mathematical nature of the universe. And all of this photography is possible because a photon's wave function can be accumulated enough to be recorded. The joke I make about this is that it is like engineering an image from how a camera is exposed to the scene it sees from the ripples of light.
if you take pic in dark do you see heartbeat if processed enough
Light also is a dynamic form of energy not a certain movement which goes back to what I say of it being a wave function.
>>4526026Hey zach would you want to be a judge in the upcoming /p/ photo contest? There will be a real prize at stake, so we need the very best judges that this place has to offer.
>>4526028I got work to get to most of the week and I need to take care of some car troubles. Most importantly I still am an amateur with a camera.
>>4526029Not sure when the photo contest is. You would merely vote on your top three from all the entries, most likely. It would not be a huge time commitment. We just need people from all walks of life to judge. You are an ideal candidate.
>Nocturnal photography (also referred to as night photography) refers to the practice of taking photographs outdoors between dusk and dawn, when natural light is minimal or nonexistent.>The low-light conditions night photographers work in require specialized techniques to achieve proper exposure, including long exposures—ranging from several seconds to days—higher ISO sensitivity, or artificial lighting.>The genre encompasses a wide range of subjects, including urban and rural landscapes, architecture, industrial sites, and astrophotography.Post your night photos!
Hi everyone. First of all, thanks for the thread—it’s exactly the kind I love. Could some of you please give me some feedback on my photo? I have a lot to learn, and I know there are so many people who are talented both in theory and in practice, so if you’re willing to share your insights, I’d love to hear them.
>>4509597I like the composition but the veil spoils the pic.>>4509730Love the foggy vibe.>>4509870I don't appreciate how you managed the colors but you sure grasped something nice.>>4509942Love it, could use some contrast and darker shades>>4509954Changes from tje usual city sights, lovely
>>4509597
>>4525820the colors in your pic are great, but the composition is all over the place. it seems like you wanted to center a light but that's not perfectly center. there's a random building to the side, and i can't see where the end of the objects you feature at the edges of the picture- they're just cutoff. the story your photo tells is incongruent and contrived- it feels like i'm walking down a sidewalk, but i'm forced to look in a very odd direction.if i were you i'd take another pic at this location, but go down the sidewalk and commit to taking a pic with the light AND the building in one frame. or you could try taking a pic of the light and an object from a low angle to add a sense of height. focus on telling a story with a picture.
>>4525943You put words on what seemed off when I looked at this pic. I couldn't wrap my head around what exactly spoiled what I tried to do. As you explained, I wanted to tell something, or at least to capture something, but you clearly explained why I failed. Your feedback is greatly appreciated, thanks a lot.
Any of you use an 8x10 before? Is it as cozy as it seems.
Honestly, no. 5x7 is the point where you still have portability and more lens options, 8x10 goes in the little too big, little too heavy, little too cumbersome territory. 8x10 negatives are beautiful and working with them is fun but the camera itself is honestly PITA.
>>4525774Eh but then you're insanely limited on film. Might as well go for broke and just go 4x5 and 8x10. Lens selection is not too bad for 8x10, but they do get BIG and expensive very very quickly. Process lenses are relatively inexpensive and usually cover 8x10 but they usually need an external shutter.You can also get a convertible lens and they can have 3 seperate focal lengths for the size of one.
>>4525834True but Ilford and Foma have 5x7 covered for B&W and for colour I just buy roll from chinks and cut sheets myself because fuck both Fuji and Kodak sheet prices.
>>4525871Where are you getting c41 large format rolls from? I have been wanting a cheap color negative for 8x10
>>4525951You can get roll of Shenguang (old Shanghai C41 emulsion) from Taobao sometimes, you just have to be lucky and patient since they don't really produce enough of it. It comes down to like 60 cents per sheet once cut which is still a steal compared to every other option.
So when are we doing this again?
>>4523171I guess he doesn't like it when someone has insight about women that he does not.
>>4509217:drools:moar
L O N D O NONDON
>>4509217This real or AI?
>>4523250>someone has insight about women>4chan camera autists
Why has the world abandoned photo shoots of good looking women?99% of anything I see now is selfies and if its a photoshoot its just to sell clothing or some super generic looking agency testshoot. 10 years ago or whatever the world was full of every good looking girl doing multiple photoshoots just for content. What happened?
OP isnt trying
>>4517018>Once you have a portfolio it is much easier to find TFP models.what if you use AI to fake a portfolio
Any excuse good enough to spam beauty
>>4525685
>>4481289jews
Only A Gameboy Camera Is Good Enoughâ„¢Previously: >>4524132
>>4525979>Mfw I'm in a misinformation competition and my opponent is Huskyfag
>>4525976I’m not gonna waste my time if you cant even use your own photo>>4525980>aka cANON aka tom aka Q aka yair netanyahu
New norwood V containment colony>>4525985
>>4525984>I can't fix the moireI know.
Anyone try this yet?
How long can you let it sit after exposing but before developing? Online I see everything from "you should develop within a few days of exposure" to "you can leave it up till its expiry date no problem". I asked a local camera shop and they said 6-10 months before you start to see degradation depending on the film. Who's telling the truth? I don't remember ever worrying about this back when I was using disposable cameras for everything.
>>4520311Exposed low iso B&W negative film can take moar time than high ISO color slide film in same conditions. And conditions matter a lot. A car glovebox at summer will challenge any film, exposed of not.Cold storage allows exposed film keep for decades in fair state, see for example https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andr%C3%A9e's_Arctic_balloon_expedition
>>4520349>If it's out and you live in Thailand, it will start to shift in a matter of weeksShit.I've had a roll in my old point and shoot from 2006. I wonder if I have to take it to some specialist place to have developed? I only want one photo from it as it's of sentimental value. Doesn't have to be great quality.
>>4525855I don't think such a specialist exists unfortunately for you. Is it color or black and white? B&W is more stable. The variables that matter are heat and humidity. The effect of heat is exponential once your reach about 30° celsius, but if it was inside and in a relatively stable environment like the bottom of a cupboard it might be still salvageable. The damage also caps with time it seems, so after 20 years it will probably be really blurry and foggy but you may still get recognizable images. In any case if you can share somz images with us along with storage conditions it would be cool.
>>4525858It was in the basement (coolest part of the house) for years. When I got into photography and got a digital I eventually started keeping it in my drycabinet in my room, that fluctuates when the turn the AC on and off etc.I have to find somewhere in Bangkok to finally develop this.
>>4525859overall those seems like good conditions. I would say it's likely the photos will be salvageable with some editing.
