Sony will save us editionPreviously on /p/ee: >>4509022
NiKEK>>4512168
>>4512125Trade ins net ~30% of resale on average. You’d get a bit over 80% of your gears value just putting it on ebay and undercutting all the japanese reseller scum.
>>4511463You waited how long for 6 more megapixels?
>>4512014>Entry Level PentaxesK1s tear the flash mount off very easily because the Pentaprism has a GPS unit above it. If it was all metal it would interfere. https://www.ebay.com/itm/178207641525That said here's a K1 for $500 for bid, not bad re: lenses has the 150-500mm Sigma Tele, 15mm Irix Prime, and Tokina 28-80mm f2.8 Pro. I'm personally wanting a 28-105mm f3.5-5.6 HD WR K1 kit lens for my K1ii
found a local seller with a Sony NEX-5N kit with an 18-55 and 55-210 and extras. worth it for $250?
Does anyone have advice regarding a card reader not reading a micro sd card?For more context, it was delivered by mail and seems like it may have been dropped (an ever so slight bump/rise to it)Local data recovery place is quoting anywhere from 800 to 2gs, which is simply out of the question due to a lack of funds.
>>4511949Flash memory is pretty resistant to physical damage as long as the chips themselves weren't cracked, and the electrical contacts of the card aren't completely sandblasted off. SD cards WILL (not might, WILL) fail anywhere between 6 months and 5 years into their used lifespan under normal circumstances, so if your card is cheap and shit you might be SoL.Seeing as you're talking about data recovery, I'm guessing this was something that had photos on it that you sent away? If I were you I'd spend the $10 on a new SD card reader to rule that out as the culprit as there are many out-of-spec and chingneseum readers that will just fail because the ambient sea level pressure rose 1.3 kPa.I've also had an amazon-tier card reader fail to read my beefier UHS-II spec cards despite the fact they're just supposed to fall back to the highest supported speed.Buy a new reader and report back OP.
>>4511965Thanks! Will do.
buy an ad.
Show me your shitty artsy bullshit, bring out your Holgas, bring out your LensBabys, bring out your bullshit where your focus is ass and your framing is tainted
>>4509754Truly tones you can't achieve on 35mm.
>>4510046Nice shot
Stomped on a fuzzy snap of lichen on a dead spruce until it stopped squirming.
Photo abusement thread, nice!
Please apply a dithering effect to one of your recent photos using this tool and post the result ITT if you don't mind: https://grainrad.com/
>>4499645Roger that. Was fun, I like this result. Original is in macro thread.
>>4499674Awesome result! >>4503325Neat, like old Indy DOS adventures
Failed to read instructions.
This thread is driving me nuts. I can't get the tool to work. Possibly a Linux issue.
I have some photos taken under tree shade with spots of light that I took with the intention of editing in the style of Monet's soft, cool shade-light contrast but I'm having a hard time nailing the post, any pointers?
post raws
>>4511640shoot raw and bracket with a tripod. thats it
Man, Myth, Legend
here is a fuckin bush
>>4511468is that your go to line still ??shit worked well here 15yrs agocool old school
the fuck happened in here>>4511439>>4511462just because you disagree, or don't understand it, doesn't make it trollinghere, I took the time to illustrate what I'm talking about: registration error in the plate cassetteunfortunately the image limit is reached, so have a catbox link: https://files.catbox.moe/hypoht.png
>>4511609I apologise to you.I am currently maintaining multiple active threads here and other places. Grief posters and bots are almost all that remain.Grammar Nazi shows up to egg shit on >>4511468as an example.Your Diagram took a lot of time. It was very well done.The RGB overlap was also odd and you showed how they stack in the finished crop. Bottom portion left is spot on.Ya done good Friend. Very Nice. And yes, words did not work here.I was always a tactile learner.In my own defence I did honestly engage in the previous posts we madeComment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>4511609>>4511641the next thread will take some timeneed to afkfor obvious reasons
2nd Tour
>>4511532that dude in the center background scares me. Looks like he has his hand behind his back like he's about to cap yo ass.Cool photos though. thanks for sharing. I hear Vietnam today is an expat paradise. they didn't carry the anger into the 21st century
>>4511216Is it? It might be meaningful to a couple of people who like drinking with Aunt Sally, but it isn't meaningful to "the masses" as a whole. Probably less so than artful pictures of shopping carts turned upside down. Both can be art, both can be content. Context and execution are both important for discussion here.
>>4511215>>4511217Are you a physicist or some kind of communist, talking about masses all the time? Do you belong to the masses or somewhere else?>separate the photography for the creation of art vs. that's used for the creation of contentPost your most artful photo.>(maybe content isn't the best term, but it's clear enough.)No it's not please clarify. Honestly confused here.>It might be meaningful to a couple of people who like drinking with Aunt Sally, ...In my book that's sufficient.
>>4511240>Are you a physicist or some kind of communistThe thread is "Do the masses even care about Photography anymore?" I'm just staying on topic and trying to clarify my point that the masses don't love photography as art more than ever, they love photography as content. It's a much cheaper kind of love. I'm conservative, btw. Distributist.>Post your most artful photoIt's difficult to qualify photos on one dimension of artfulness. Here's one I like from last year, anyway.>content vs. artI'm not going to sit here and pretend to be able to give a definition for art that will satisfy the room, but it is worthwhile to examine the differences between art and content. The intent and creator's perspective matters with the creation of art. It does not matter for the creation of content, which would have the same meaning regardless of who and how it was made.My favorite youtube channel has a nice short breakdown on the subject.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W-FXiBLG8Js
>>4511248Not to get hung up on semantics, but consider that a self portrait is meant to capture and express some aspect of the artist, i.e. art. A selfie is more concerned with the what or where the photographer is, i.e. content. Again there exists a spectrum between the two. An upside down cart may not be to your taste, but it's probably more artful or aesthetically pleasing than most selfies.
>>4505092My ADHD went dormant when living in Alaska
Go /p/ro.>Want:• Expect criticism regarding your uploads.• /p/ is for photos: so feel free to post them as often as possible, even if "image unrelated" to your text. • Use "Recent Photos" threads if you are shy or only want to post a small number of photos. • Raw Files which can be collectively edited for discussion of post-processing techniques are encouraged. • Please check the catalogue for similar topic(s) before creating a new thread.>Do Not Want: • Go to >>>/wsr/ for specific Photoshop requests. • Gear threads are discouraged but permitted. Keep in mind that many users simply hide these threads. Want to learn more? • The /p/ Wiki - http://archive.today/15tYK
>>4510835The guy who fucking started this mutant deformed dog breed i hope he suffers in hell. The only gs that should be accepted should be working gsd, the ones that look like normal dogs not the ones with fucked up back legs.
>>4511142Spends tens of thousands £ on gear, still stars ave angel wings in the corners. Thanks for stopping me in searching for a better milky way lens
>>4511151Sorry I lied. I only took that pic a little over 2 years ago.>>4511256That was taken with a graflex xlsw with the old style 47mm super angulon and horseman 6x9 back. Super fun and simple camera that costs under a grand. The dust was free. :D
>>4511260>>4511168I was never complimenting the terrible practice photos you took of your mutt. The two egg photos you posted ITT are the only good photos you have ever posted here. Everything else has been pretty garbage, every bit as bad your husky owning alter ego’s landscapes.
>>4511271>schizo nophoto has shit taste in dogtography.Thank you for the compliments, angry lil guy. If you post some exceptional work, like I have, I would love to return the favor and give you some big props as well. :)
In April/May I went to China to my brother’s wedding and took a bunch of photos there. Since I’ve got a lot of photographs, I was thinking about getting some feedback as I’m trying to improve and got that feeling that I’m stuck. My photos doesn’t have a well defined style, so the compositions and color grade floats a lot.
>>4509819may I ask what do you use for shooting?
>>4511178I miss exif.
>>4509953>>4509828>>4509952These are really cool!
I'd try simplifying things and exclude more
>>4510294>>4510480>>4511223Thanks! I’m glad that you liked >>4511178Sure, I’m using the Canon R8, most of my photos were with the RF 100mm f2.8 and the RF 70-200 f4. For the wide angles, I’ve used the RF 16mm. >>4511241It came out pretty nice also, it gave the dog more emphasis.
night scenes editionprevious >>4501719
>>4504432Subtle Tung Tung Tung Sahur. Very nice
>>4503437really nicepreserved the highlights,neat framingnatural perspective“vibes”
>>4503527interestingsomewhat abstractvery moody
>>4503528a truly ugly branchstraighten the horizon at least
>>4503536too much light>>4504999not badsly, cheeky, aloofa lot comes from posture
Known for his pioneering work in color photography and his effort to document early 20th-century Russia.
>>4506521awesome!
>>4505507>>4505526>>4505537incredible photoshow much wealth did the russians have?
>>4506887Thank You>>4507208on par with the Germans or Swedes of the time. imonew thread here>>4506977>>4506977>>4506977
>>4505996>>4506000>The lenses had to be in a stack with the center lens on center.if it was taken with three lenses, we'd see way more parallax "CA"but all I've seen is from stuff moving in-frame in different colors, which also implies multiple shots on a single lens>Top left corner roofline is off set in a down/up angle in the top and bottom imagesthe framing offsets in >>4505619 are probably from imperfect alignment when moving the plate between the shots, otherwise the top & bottom images would be offset in opposite directions relative to the center oneso yeah, all evidence points to a setup like Miethe's 1906 >>4505938 on top
>>4511141Thank for your input and I can't argue with the logic.A closer comparison to other three frames would be important.If the declamation in framing observed in the sample I gave is consistently present,I would say no to the theory.You would not move the base the same way each time in other locations for other shots.My description includes your offset angles approach. Center lens straighttop lens 20 degrees downbottom lens 20 degrees up.Odd none of his gear was in any photos. The Mirthe camera seems gigantic and cumbersome. I don't see how you could slide into the next frame regularlywithout a noticeable difference in border framing. Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
New to 4 Chan my name is Olivia
just b urself olivia there's no rules except post photos, talk about photos, and don't talk about not photos.
>>4510489bro why is there spaghetti all over the place here
Hi Olivia,Welcome, you will probably come across some very bitter and mean people here and realise 4chan isn't the place for you.However, if you are determined to stay, stick to the /RPT/ (recent photo) threads, or other threads specifically about photos. Most of the most active threads on this board are unfortunately about buying camera gear or having arguements.Good luck
>>4510464>tldr: just shoot photosWhen you take a photo, try to have a clear subject in mind, or at the very least intresting elements. When you take a photo, what looks good to you in person will not always translate to an image as it has to flatten and compress it, and you lose a lot of the small details as a result. I'd reccomend going through the threads and looking through them, avoiding the arguments and gear talk and focusing on the pics themselves. Find ones you think look nice and interesting, and think about what you like about them. Lastly, the most important advice of them all, go out, take photos, and just have fun
Thanks for the advice
