Hi, im amateur and mostly shoot my animals and nature during my rare trips.My mom has some clothes that she sewed herself and also we have some form my gradnma collecting dust. Before donating, my idea was to create an album from them, basically, >10 pics. How do i work with models? Need to contact an agency or just connect straight to them via ig or something? Also do i need real models and wannabe models? Cant i just browse ig for half an hour, find a couple girls i find would do go and try? Do i need to make them sign papers or smt? Also just do boring af aws catalogue tier pics or try to emulate shots from vogue? For crazy poses, do i need an actual fashion model™ or a random girl from ig/college/my neighboor will do?
>>4339901>theres some skinny girls that would be coolAny examples?
>>4339901Good on you for setting standards for your models>no fat chicksI’d also add >no visible tattoos
>>4339920And don’t forget no weird visible piercings, and nice standard natural hair colours. Does such a woman even exist anymore? Lol
>>4339945>>4339906Yeah, visit a local college.Dont mind tattoos and colored hair, but yeah, please be almost anorexic adn young. Not wating money on a fatty or a soon to be mummy of 22+.
>>4339920What about dicks? Are dicks a deal breaker?
Scilla bifolia edition[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeFUJIFILMCamera ModelX-S10Camera SoftwareCapture One 22 WindowsMaximum Lens Aperturef/2.8Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)120 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiExposure Time1/180 secF-Numberf/8.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating160Lens Aperturef/8.0Brightness5.4 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashFlashFocal Length80.00 mmImage Width1500Image Height1000RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
>>4338042The OM-1 has way better C-AF, and the OM-1.2 improves further on subject tracking especially. These matter a lot for birding but if you just do macro they don't matter.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeOLYMPUS IMAGING CORP.Camera ModelE-M5MarkIICamera SoftwareVersion 4.0Maximum Lens Aperturef/3.5Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution350 dpiVertical Resolution350 dpiImage Created2024:07:09 19:38:52Exposure Time1/160 secF-Numberf/9.0Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating200Exposure Bias2 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashFlash, AutoFocal Length30.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width4608Image Height3456RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlLow Gain UpContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormal
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeOLYMPUS IMAGING CORP.Camera ModelE-M5MarkIICamera SoftwareVersion 4.0Maximum Lens Aperturef/3.5Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution350 dpiVertical Resolution350 dpiImage Created2024:07:09 19:56:42Exposure Time1/160 secF-Numberf/7.1Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating200Exposure Bias1.3 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashFlash, AutoFocal Length30.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width4608Image Height3456RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlLow Gain UpContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormal
Is it normal that darktable tripples the file size if I do so much as select local contrast, sharpen and correct for my dedicated lens?>image limit reached
I stepped in dog shit trying to take photos for /macro/ once. True story. Now, who's baking the new bread?
Hey everyone I’m trying to find the 4k version of the pic above because I want to make a custom poster to hang in my room. It’s just a cool photo, really iconic, and I’m about it. Now that I got that gay backstory out of the way I come to /p/ and ask because no one else seems to have it. All the news articles have lower quality versions, and moderators have removed it from websites like reddit or imagestock. Search engines just return those same low quality news articles; google/bing doesn’t even try to return a search that is consistent with my query. Can anyone help me out and provide the 4k photo? If not, can anyone help point me in the direction of where I can find it?Thanks in advance[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution350 dpiVertical Resolution350 dpiColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1198Image Height798Scene Capture TypeStandard
It's a cool photo, but it just doesn't have that je ne sais quoi that past historical photos had.
>>4339852Would you say it insists upon itself too much?
>>4339852because its 100% staged, right down to instructing the photographer to use excessive shutter speedshistorical photos were more authentic
>>4340063You're telling me Sony controls are too slow to jump to max speed as soon as you see weird stuff happening with the SS?
>>4340065>weird stuff happening with the SS?Is that a Canon thing? It's pretty consistent on Sony
This is my favorite camera in the whole world: the Canon AutoBoy 2. It's a point and shoot film camera from 1983 that has autofocus.I bought one a couple of years ago. Mine is so clean that it looks new and all of the functions work. I love the photos that come out of it because they're clean and have good quality while still looking like they're from the 1980s. I have a few exposures left on my current roll and I'm excited to get it developed soon because I've been working on this roll for almost a year now. Also I love how the camera looks, it screams "1980s" in a way that a lot of the cameras from later in the decade simply don't.Say something nice about the best camera ever made.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width464Image Height661Scene Capture TypeStandard
I like it, seems pretty cool camera despite its model name being kind of ghhayyy
>>4339772I am glad you enjoy it.
>>4339850Unironically meds. Or six-shooter
>>4339877It's Sunday, friend.
>>4339772Pic's?
Previous Thread: >>4326617[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelEOS RPImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution1 dpVertical Resolution1 dpExposure Time1/320 secF-Numberf/1.8ISO Speed Rating10000Focal Length50.00 mmColor Space InformationUncalibrated
>>4339756[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Lightroom 9.4.0 (iOS)Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2024:07:20 18:31:42Color Space InformationsRGBImage Width4706Image Height4000Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>4333386[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeOM Digital SolutionsCamera ModelOM-1Camera SoftwareCapture One WindowsMaximum Lens Aperturef/1.8Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiExposure Time1/80 secF-Numberf/4.0Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating200Lens Aperturef/4.0Exposure Bias0 EVSubject Distance2.54 mMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length17.00 mmImage Width2500Image Height1875RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlNoneContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormal
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSONYCamera ModelILCE-7RM2Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.2 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.0Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2024:04:27 04:25:53Exposure Time1/640 secExposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating100Brightness4.9 EVExposure Bias0.3 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceDaylightFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandardContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormal
some pre-dawn fox[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS 90DCamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.4 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/6.2Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2024:07:21 06:51:02Exposure Time1/640 secF-Numberf/6.3Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating16000Lens Aperturef/6.3Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePartialFlashNo FlashFocal Length400.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandard
>>4336339oh that's really nice
For love of the pentaprism.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:
thoughts on the pentax ME?
>>4335986this fella says they break easilyhttps://youtu.be/tdWKGI2apuc?t=100
Last month I took many pics with shutter priority mode[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakePENTAXCamera ModelPENTAX K-7Camera SoftwareK-7 Ver 1.13Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)102 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2024:06:19 21:21:15Exposure Time1/8 secF-Numberf/13.0Exposure ProgramShutter PriorityISO Speed Rating100Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length68.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1728Image Height1152RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandardContrastHardSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeClose View
>>4336295And with old screw-mount lens[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakePENTAXCamera ModelPENTAX K-7Camera SoftwareK-7 Ver 1.13Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)0 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2024:06:23 16:22:46Exposure Time1/500 secF-Numberf/0.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating100Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length0.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1728Image Height1152RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandardContrastSoftSaturationNormalSharpnessHardSubject Distance RangeDistant View
>>4336297>>4315063>>4315062These are all good. That screw lens works for these types of pictures.
>>4339294>there's a reason every major body has it regardless of brand.Yeah, bullshit consoomerism meetoo nonsense, but please, keep trying to convince me how it’s necessary for photography.
>>4339393It was invented solely for photography because nobody likes to carry tripods. That's it. Tripods suck.>CONSOOMER METOO REEEE! BUYING THINGS BAD!Ok, i see you out there with your tripod, oh wait no i dont. Don't forget to live in a dirt hovel because you don't need floors. Those are for consoomers.
>>4339368You lost
>>4339282But spending 1000 bucks more for a R6II would've helped, got it.>>4339288Actually wasps
>>4332032Why is the image so bad?
/p/ humor thread?
>>4339631>nikon missed focusshoulda bought a zf
>selloutsThey went from shilling gear on one gearfag site to a progressive homo gearfag siteNot really surprising
>>4339600they work for a camera store. salesmen can't sellout.
>>4339897They can sell out of product.
>>4339897they haven't for years now, retard
What I am for sis? will this make me take better photos and make friends?
>>4339102lol, it’s just a 300 with a self timer and updated exterior design
>>4338212Based camera>Richfags sethee>Filmcucks mald>Brandfags dilate
>>4339218>>Filmcucks maldwe don't do whatever that word is I'm pretty sure>>4338212better photos, maybe not, but it's pretty fun. I love my mini 90 and it's always a good time
>>4338212nice but also you can use any camera and just use selphy canon printer
>>4339761>weWhat, all seven of you?
Whats a cheap 35mm rangefinder to get? I've been looking at the Olympus 35 sp but struggling to find one for a decent price.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareQuickTime 6.5.2Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2007:09:12 00:46:14
>>4339615yashica electro is worth looking at if you're looking for a fixed-lens RF cam.
>>4339615Got two of them. Absolute beast.Pentona 2 is also great.
>>4339727Not saying much, all of these cameras mentioned are 40+ years old by now.CLA is a must as with all ancient mechanical contraptions.
For me, it's the Sokol 2
>>4339615I have a 35-sp, its pretty sweet. Has spot metering and aperture priority and that 42mm lens is just amazing, I struggle with both 50 and 35 after becoming accustomed to 42mm. I still would rather bring a point and shoot than this literal brick of a camera with its super dim focus patch
Powershit SX740 HS > MFTPanasonic (digital camera dept) and Olympus execs are sharpening seppuku knives
>>4339607it doesn't show it there, but you type in olympus the search bar and you can select "olympus camera brand". OM system is not well known, so that wouldn't make sense as a comparison
>>4339612Olympus camera brand doesnt exist anymore. It’s OM system.
>>4339614Ok
>>4339614You are a retarded autist, the objectively worst kind
Would suck for me being a scalping reseller lowlife if they reintroduced compact cameras. I'm cashing in on these zoomzooms right now, but then again it would be very strange if they did not adapt to the current market conditions. Fairly certain those V10 vlogging cameras flopped immensely.
I have been using my sd1200 for years now and i actually love the grainy shit styleI wish it did low light better or maybe didnt always have a blur in some shotsCan anyone reccomend a similar style/quality? Will most point and shoots from this year release be similar?I tried out the sony zv1 or whatever... but it looks too sharp and new. I like the vintsge looksLemmme know what to lookat. Thx /p/ros
>>4339796>i actually love the grainy shit style>I wish it did low light better
>>4339796>it looks too sharp and new. I like the vintsge looksfilm effect filters and presetsI refuse to elaborate
>>4339797Yeah tell me how to still have the grainy vintage look but just be a little betterI guess i will have to study and figure if its a megapixel thing, sensor thingOr iso /shitter settingsToo bad most photographers areGay, narcisists, and/or think they are cool but they actually arent
>>4339798So what just use a shiny new camera but process it in photoshop with a vintage filter? Sounds gay
I want to start a Youtube channel, but I'm not sure about the equipment or what skills I need. Could I just record using an Iphone 15 or do I need some sort of mirrorless camera?My budget is $500 tops.Could go to $1000, I guess I'll need a tripod and microphone? I'm planning on recording voice over the scenes.
>>4339505you can use your iPhone for everything, just buy a light or twoalso next time you have a stupid question ask in the stupid questions thread
What you should really do:1. Use your iPhone. Go to Walmart and buy some of their cheap video lights, tripods, etc. GET A DECENT MICROPHONE.2. Start making videos. 3. You're going to suck. Buy some books on how to make better videos. "How to Shoot Video That Doesn't Suck" is a good start.Start investing in good lighting.4. You'll start getting good.5. ONLY THEN buy a GH5 or GH5ii, and buy a nice lens with it, the 12-60mm Leica branded one is a good start.What you're actually going to do:1. Blow your entire budget on the most expensive Sony camera you can with the cheapest lens you can.2. Struggle to get even 5 followers, four of them are people you begged. The fifth is probably a bot.3. Get depressed. Give up.4. Set the camera on your shelf. Occasionally remember it exists and play with it for 5-10 minutes reminiscing over what could've been.5. Become a /p/ shit poster.
It all depends on how entertaining your content is. You could get away with a potato if you are interesting enough.
Protip: dont be a faggot with your mic in frameYou can get a cheapo shotgun mic on a mic stand placed out of frame
>>4339780Or cheapo lapel mic*
>Spends thousands on full frame gear>uses top of the line equipment for dog photos>everyone at the dog park is staring at their ridiculous camera setup trying to figure out if they are a creep or just autistic>takes such unremarkable photos they don't even bother to get them printed>"At least it looks better than a cellphone photo">wastes time on /pee/ obsessing over purchase>turns camera sensor size into identity politics>furiously specubates over the thought of convincing someone to buy the same thing as them>Only turned on by MTF chartsHonestly insane the amount of time you guys spend thinking about another man's sensor. If you were actually that much of a sensor size queen you would be doing something cool like shooting 8x10.
>>4338379I enjoy my Zf more than my GM1. But it's probably because I don't like shooting from a screen and need a viewfinder.Nothing wrong with MFT but full frame is unironically better in every way other than price.
*snaps*[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakePanasonicCamera ModelDMC-GF5Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 8.2.1 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.7Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)54 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2024:07:19 20:51:03Exposure Time1/60 secF-Numberf/22.0Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating160Lens Aperturef/22.0Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceFlashFlashFlash, CompulsoryFocal Length25.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlLow Gain UpContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormal
>>4339460The only anons claiming M43 is superior to anything but a phone are the drooling retards. Unfortunately it seems the per-capita spread of them on this board is higher than we'd like. I don't even know if price is a fair point. An E-PL10 is like $850 USD with a twin lens kit. Pretty sure the Canon R10 is that much with its kit lens (admittedly only the one). Even the used market seems to even out, with Olympus bodies from like 2015 going for $300, but so are Canon 70D's and Nikon D5300's. SO I conclude that M43 is a fashion statement like buying a mercedes or a hassy
>>4339601$850 is getting dangerously close to being able to afford a z6ii, xt4, a6600, locally bought a7iii or a7c, basically any FF DSLR except a memed up d850…And almost any non leica 35mm film cameraAnd basically every jap medium format slrAnd a hasselblad 500cm kit is only $350 asayA good camera could just be a little OT at McD’s away!
>>4339601A hasselblad is not a fashion statement. If you want a compact mechanical medium format slr that takes god tier lenses and has a wlvf, you don’t have many other options. Bronica sq/etr cameras are not quite as reliable and the lenses are not so good. Nothing else can even be compared, it all fails on at least one point of>compact>medium format>slr>with wlvf>reliable>takes god tier lensesIncluding meme bronicasI conclude that if you don’t have a hasselblad yet there’s something wrong with you. A 500cm with lens ready to shoot is not much, just sell one single 35mm digital camera and you can buy two of them. Maybe your photography isn’t good enough for one yet?
Previous >>4311774 (image limit reached)Wildlife/animal/zoo Photography BreadPost your favorite shots of animals that you've taken. This isn't so much a gearfaggotry thread, but discuss your favorite telephoto lenses if you'd like. Watersnake, Beasoleil Island[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS 700DImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2024:07:08 11:47:44Exposure Time1/800 secF-Numberf/5.6Exposure ProgramActionISO Speed Rating250Lens Aperturef/5.7Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length55.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width5184Image Height3456RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandard
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Lightroom 9.4.0 (iOS)Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2024:07:12 09:30:19Color Space InformationsRGBImage Width5873Image Height4000Scene Capture TypeStandard
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwarePhotoshop Express 24.23.2.8316Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2024:07:12 11:35:27Color Space InformationsRGBImage Width4000Image Height6000
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Lightroom 9.4.0 (iOS)Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2024:07:12 19:25:09Color Space InformationsRGBImage Width4706Image Height3509Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>4336017No flash for any of these frogs? Where is the light coming from?
>>4339514Headlamp
