I am going to buy one as soon as they hit the market in early Novemeber. I hope I get the 1987 edition. It's fire. Which one are you hoping to score?You are going to be getting one right /p/?You aren't gonna be a contrarian try hard no Charmera /p/haggot are you /p/? ISHYDDT
>>4470794>>4470813>The camera’s built-in flash is an LED, rather than a xenon flash.Shameful. They had one job.
>>4470858>>4470437No. I don't think I will. I'm gonna buy a Charmera instead.>>4470866>Kodak Yellow 1987 EditionOh man. That's the one I want.FUUUUUUUUK. I hope I don't have to buy more than one to get it. Thinking about buying the six pack just to be sure I get one. Could easily scalp the rest to cover the cost I bet.
>>4470152Shoot Ektar at 50 and E6 that shit nigger.
>>4471135it's just not the same. sigh...
>>4470376INSULT MASTER WONG AND MEET SWIFT DEATH, PIG
Drunk ordered one of these last night. Got fomo seeing everyone falling back in love with photography, using the optical viewfinder and onboard flash. Did I fuck up?
>>4471971No photos of the time you didnt realize what silent shutter did then?
>>4471855>>4471869>Every other camera brand takes good pics on the default settings>Snoy doesnt and requires tinkering and editing>Actually thats a good thing!>Its intentionally supposed to be bad!>s-skill issue!holy cope
>>4471978Lol cope camera
>>4460982would be nice if they made one of these with an 18mm lens
>>4460982Nice nails. chic
>He doesn't export all his photos as .dngs onto hard drives to have timeless, future proofs for when proprietary "RAW" files become obsolete NGMI
>>4471827Calm your tits
>>4471743Not necessarily. DNG doesn't have to be demosaic'd. Ricoh RAWs are in DNG format I think.>>4471734>>4471743The fact that unpaid opensource commies have sort of reverse engineered most raw formats doesn't mean there shouldn't exist an open format, given how all camera sensors are more or less the same anyway.
>>4471732As long as we have OS's that can run NX Studio, NEF will never be obsolete.
>>4471831after you kys
>>4471827ok and? as if you can't pirate capture one lel
Took these yesterday with my Galaxy s24, 30 second exposure, ISO 3200. Will post the originals as well.
We are like... star dust dude
>>4471304Hold on a second, are the first 3 your edited photos and the second three your photos you took in this RAW photo app? What is this RAW photo app? Each app could be doing something different. What did you edit these in as well?If I've understood the original/edit posts properly, I think what you're actually getting is darkness around the lens from either the camera or the telescope, and then when you edit them for exposure and saturation the dark parts get dropped meaning you have these lit up blobs left in the middle.I'm guessing that based on the circular vignetting in the originals, and that the light blobs in the edits are the same shape.
>>4471327the first pics look like the aislop went crazy and turned a large part of the milky way into a globular cluster ? the others look a lot more like real vignetting
>>4471401If you look at the thumbnails you can see that the density patterns for all of them match up to the unedited ones.The saturations will be picking peaks in the noise to turn into singular points, and that'll be where we're getting our "stars" from.OP, post the raws and the edits you made and let me see if I can replicate this with a set up that definitely doesn't involve AI to test this.
>>4471327The first 3 are the same as the bottom 3, with the brightness, colors, contrast and saturation edited. The RAW photo app let's you manually control the ISO, shutter speed, focus ect. They usually look worse than the standard photo app if you don't fiddle with it correctly, like a regular camera. Here's another I took with it.
What are your favorite Lightroom presets to work with? I have a hard time finding something because they either turn the photo in a depressive nightmare with dull dark colors or they change skin colors to yellow. Looking for something more vibrant, happy with punchy colors and still natural, not overprocessed.
Skittles from fropack 1 obviously
>>4471594camera standard
Post photos you like.
>>4471419
>>4471420
>>4471421
>>4471422
>>4470053Welcome back cruz
How often do you all go through your digital files and purge? I look back and realize a lot of my digital photos are unnecessary garbage, it amazes me how when i shoot film I take high quality photos I want, whereas when I review my digital shots I end up cringing that I even took a large majority of the picturesDo you guys purge your digital shots often?Do you find yourself reflecting back at how awful some photos are that you took and unnecessary such as landscapes and random street photography? or even people you don't even interact with anymoreI see why film is the superior method
>>4471426Never, I just buy more storage. Even if a photo is dogshit I can still use it to learn from, and re-take a better version in the future. I have never deleted a photo since I started shooting, I'm currently at 7TB.
i'm pretty aggressive when it comes to purging. instead of deleting one by one, i just select the pictures that somewhat decent. then select the rest and delete all permanently
Here are my bad photos of a theme park. I only took a 20 year old digishit with me. EnjoyA photo of the hotel is mandatory
These honestly just look like they're from a smartphone, there's not much of that typical digishit flaws in them that you'd see 20 years ago. Funnily enough you've bought a camera that is too good.
>>4471014The lf1 is in that weird territory of pre 1” “large sensor” cameras that were made to compete with the canon S series, but were too late in time because the rx100, gx7, and cell phones were taking over. They’re fun because they provide manual controls and such but image quality wise the 1.7” ones were always cellphone at best in good light.
>>4471014>>4471017lf1 anon here...i didn't post any images here yet...i bought it..saw that fat hair on sensor and dropped ituntil today when i fixed it...will take it out soon.
>>4452698>DevagI'd like to D her vag, if you know what I mean.
>>4464056
>Tried rangefinder camera for the first time>Yashica_Electro_35_GTN.jpg>Felt absolutely like shit to shoot>The shutter sound boring>Felt awkward to holdRemind me again why people like film rangefinder? Not to mention that my friend bought it used and the quality of the viewfinder itself is quite terrible. so like, why? Do I need to try Leica or something?
>>4451975>the shutter sound boringare you really this much of an autist?
>>4451975I like using my Olympus XA rangefinder, mainly because it's tiny and I can carry around in a pant pocket for random family photos whenever we go out.I have no interest in lugging around my SLR when we go to a diner or concert.>>4467778There's a weird amount of people that consider the "feel" and "sound" of the shutter and film advance to be a significant factor in how much they like a camera.IMO the only things that matter are ergonomics, features, and image quality.
>>4451975DESU I'd recommend you do try a Leica. Just go to your local Leica store with your credit card and a roll of film. ask them to look at some of the cameras. Eventually ask to look at one of their film bodies. After you chat with the salesperson for a half hour or so, ask them if it would be possible to do a walk around with the camera. You will need collateral, a card that can cover the camera if you lose/steal it, or gear insurance for rentals that would cover it in case of loss.I regularly walk around with their bodies and it's always an enjoyable experience, just remember that it's polite to buy something every once in a while. I usually pick up the latest issue of the LFI magazine while I'm there.While I do like their film bodies, I also tried a digital rangefinder that had no screen. It's quite literally the closest you can get to shooting film without having to actually shoot film, although I really enjoyed my experience with the MP. Nothing beats the feel and ritual of shooting film.
>>4451975maybe find that epson rangefinder with voigtlander no need develop film
>>4467572>IT'S DA JOOS
I thought someone here might be interested in these vintage Kodak items and Polaroid film. I'm a long time lurker of the boards but have never been on /p/ before, but I thought I'd give you guys first dibs.I'd hate to see these go to waste, shoot me an offer.assefef@proton.me
>>4470597tree fity
5 dollary doors and a button
>>4470597I'll take it off your hands for free + you pay shippingI'm doing you a service here, remember
>>4470597top zoozle
Are there any other photographers out there that have similar or better work ? Unironically used to love his style.
>>4470880wtf terry is based? i thought he only had consensual sex that some ho regretted 5 years later. if he’s an actual rapist i like him a lot more now.
>>4470880It’s not rape if she was into it at the time and decided post wall that she regrets all her choices, chuddie. Which is every single time with these guys.
>>4470880Imagine believing some cum gargling roasites.
>>4468966>>4468968that's why I'm still sticking with my XF10, the built-in fill flash serves it's purpose well.
>>4468690>what is your favorite work of his?His pecker in upcoming models.
Are there anons here who are not really photography ppl but still into film developing because the aspect of developing your film urself is fun? I always have this issue where I don't feel an urge to take photos, as I don't have much of a creative bone, but I feel a lot of desire to make my own prints and develop film.
>>4470590comes to think that on 2 occasions i have seen zoomers using a kodak funsaver
>>4470601The thing is I have no way to scan or to enlarge them
>>4470587i don't really care for photography but like the idea of it as a way to remember or save memoriesnot once have i reminisced over photos taken with the phone so i bought a film camera, dev stuff, and a scanner some years backfound that not having the "instant feedback" of digital photography and actually taking the time to develop, scan, and print the shots lets me enjoy them moresupposedly could get away with printing from a digital camera too but i just dont care for it. literally exactly the same as a phone, hundreds of photos to transfer and scroll through
>>4470697Make contact prints. No excuses
Bump
Get back out there edition.
>>4459229nikon ain't expensive I got 2
>>4457795>PLAY OATIs it good?
>>4458676Almost dreamy. Darken the hoop a bit, too grey.
>>4458676I’ve seen this before in the /rpt/what are you trying to do? if you explain your idea for the end result we may be able to help. ignore this if you’re just experimenting/iterating.
>>4471056It was a crappy shot so I decided to get all artsy with it. Some old darkroom tech plus some Rockwell.
Is the concept of always having a camera on you to photograph daily life something reserved for the rich (or unemployed)?How are you supposed to create a body of work based on day-to-day experiences when you're in an office for 8 hours a day, 5 days a week, slaving away for corporate overlords? The only time I can see myself doing this is on a month-long holiday overseas or something. How the fuck do they do it?
>>4467763God this board is just autism lmao
>>4467770If I got 100 cool photos from 5000 I'd probably just leave the hobby altogether as it's a complete failure considering the cost of each 36exp film roll + dev and scan.
>>4468970>Moop's dogIf he ever had one it probably died from neglect by now
>>4467763I come home, eat, chill for half an hour and go outside for an hour or so. I forced myself to adapt this behaviour because looking at the clock and counting down the hours before I had to go to bed again melted away my life. Giving myself this one hour, leaving my phone at home and taking my Ricoh with me instead improved my mental health.
>>4467763I work retail and I carry two cameras in my bag not including my iPhone 16 Pro Max.I have a Sony A6100 with both a 3.5 15-60 and a 1.8 50mm prime.I also have a Pentax 115m with a roll of Kodak UltraMax 400 for when I want to shoot film.When I'm off work and I go out for the sole purpose of shooting photos, I carry my Leica SL2 with a 60mm Macro Elmarit R.Most of the time I don't use them, but when I do its 100000% worth having them.(plus I have the added possibility of someone stealing my shit and getting an upgrade for free through my insurance.)
Insta threadWill follow anyone>horgen_fotoHad anyone got tips on how to find less popular content?The algorithm is just feeding me terrible tiktok reels with millions of views all day long.
I had a question I was going to ask on /sqt/ but this seems related enough to me.I'm borrowing a DSLR camera for the time being and I started uploading my pics to an instagram account where basically only 4 or 5 people I know IRL check them out frequently (including the person I borrowed that camera from, I think that was their purpose to begin with)IG compresses pictures to shit and it isn't great for showing pictures at full resolution either. So that got me thinking: If I got a new camera for myself, should I even give a fuck about how sharp my images are if I can't even take proper pictures in the first place? I've been looking at pricey DSLR cameras and some mirrorless shit out there, but wouldn't it be better as a starter to look for something more convenient instead of something with an image quality no one's going to even be able to notice?
>>4470960instagram is a goy activity and dedicated cameras are for actual people
>>4470965I understand, but are actual people bothered about brand loyalty and what a picture looks like when zoomed in hard like some faggots in this board are?
>>4470960Take pictures however you want, as long as you're enjoying it. Fuck the noise dude.
>>4470960Something to keep in mind is that quality that is displayed can change in the future and you can always lower quality but not get it back. So if you ever take some photos you love and have them in shit quality, they're shit quality forever.You can also get higher quality pictures on Instagram if you start with smaller images. So if you compressed the photo yourself to say 500x500 and used 95 quality, it will pretty much be that when you upload it.
