How important is sensor size really? I've been thinking of getting a camera that is both good at video and photo and want to avoid full frame due to its high pricing and big size. A lot of people seem to love the GH series from Lumix but I hear tons of backlash in this board making fun of how mft is obsolete and has " phone tier' image quality . Is the mft that big of an issue when the gh7 has dual iso or should I just go with aps c . I am willing to spend around 800-1300 usd.
>>4518013https://youtu.be/SpUkq6DJZh0
>>4522332The lenses are much smaller and cheaper. Whether that's a benefit for you carrying stuff depends on your setup and shooting criteria, but it will always be a benefit for your wallet. You also get more reach than anything on full frame. There is a 200-600 lens that accepts a 2x teleconverter. That is 2400mm equivalent for a full frame camera. They simply don't make lenses with that sort of reach on full frame and if they did it would be the size of a person.
>>4524207>you could spend $3000 to take a more zoomed in photo of a bird now with atmospheric haze and shimmer at levels fool framers cant comprehend. but guess what? i have the secret power of m43!>@GROK, MAKE MY PHOTO SHARP, VIBRANT AND CLEAR AND REMOVE ALL THE NOISE!>fool framers btfo! the skill of getting closer is DEPRECATED! Hahahaha ear shit poppets! Full frame is over bucko!>-some british hobo
>>4524219Only oldfags remember, k3k
Is that a Messi fan? Lmao L pessi dickriders
Please rate. 0: uninteresting snapshit1: deeply flawed2: decent, interesting, cool3: striking image
>>4524153It's hard because the most given criticism in this thread is "it's not bad, but I am not interested / it is not interesting.". I don't really know what to do about it. I can try to improve my photos but I cannot change my interests, exploring those is kind of the whole thing with art isn't it.
>>4524135Yea, your subject and photo type is kind of niche. Same with macro insects. Some ppl are disgusted , to some they give nightmares. I ilke it and always pixel peep to see some details that you can t really see with the naked eyed. For example i like the derelict/abandoned factories houses subway stations and always zoom in and check for details.While looking at your photos i realised that some not so obvious things could be considered. I might be a retard and this stuff might be the stupidest thing you read on thia site but hear me out>>4517960>>4517957>>4517955>>4517953 You could match the corner of the building to be on the photo diagonal so it pints exactly at the photo cornerSomething g like this anon did voluntarily or involuntarely but missed by a couple of mm>>4502563Don t remember how this style is called where you shot the pictures in abnormal ways>>4518331>>4518332Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>4524168Are you making art for yourself or for others? If it's for others, you may have to make some sacrifices in what you naturally want to do. If it's for yourself, why are you even asking what other people think?There's a lot of research showing that people prefer natural forms that follow the golden ratio instead of geometric shapes. Even putting that aside though, just broadly speaking these are very simple images without a lot going on. There is no artistic message, you are just trying to take pictures of stuff that looks cool. Therefore it lives and dies by how cool it actually looks. You only have a few broad shapes and colors in each of these pictures. What exactly is supposed to be interesting about it?
>>4524204Thanks for the feedback and suggestions. I will see if it works out for me.>>4524209Thanks for the message but I don't agree with your criticism.>Are you making art for yourself or for others?Both. I like making it, and I like to share it.>If it's for yourself, why are you even asking what other people think? Caring about what other people think of your work doesn't mean you didn't do it for yourself.>There's a lot of research doubt Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>4524291this post has revealed you are just too stupid to be helped.
I thought he was le gay? Or did he just hire a model to beat the allegations?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3BG-5n_lxpI
>>4522971> When you are so obsessed with being gay you believe a random youtuber who almost never talk about his personnal life and shows 0 sign of gayness is gay and his wife is a model he hired to """beat the allegations""" (actually just your mental illness)
>>4522971What the fuck does have to do with photography? I don't care if this man takes it up the ass or not.
>>4522974TRUTH
>>4522974he's got a MAN van though
>>4522971Literally who?
Going to dump a bunch of photos I've taken over time, enjoy. Criticism and feedback is welcome since I want to know what anons think or what I could do better.
>>4523917that's just another version of the "photo is good because I like it". "There is no skill to drawing because I like this drawing in which I see no skill". Whatever question you encounter in life, you can always answer "it depends, it's a matter of personnal preference". Relativism is not an opinion, is just a basic concept to keep in mind and remember most things are ultimately subjective. By denying the skill ceilings are different when learning photo and drawing, you're just refusing to think.
>>4523917Unironically looks kino, reminds me of some of those weird drawings you'd see in 1920s upper class magazines or something.
>>4523484>>4523499>>4523446I like these ones. Adelaide is boring as fuck too so nice job.
>>4523926never there was any mention of "skill" in this conversation.it takes more skill to break the rules than follow them.
>>4523977>there is no rules>it takes more skill to break the rules than to follow themyes
Only A Sony Is Good Enough™ Last time sony won: >>4522451
>>4524090135 format film double frame: 36x24mmFull-frame sensor, which was designed and specified specifically to match the above: 36x24mmAre you retarded?
>>4524110>Phase OneMassively overpriced pretentious nonsense. More so than usual, that is.
>>4524169lol clueless retard
Is the Nikon Z8 still worth it? The Sony A7RV is cheaper used, higher res and same DR. Z8 has faster readout and burst. I shoot a lot of Landscapes now with a 24mp camera and would like some more detail. I also want to get into wildlife photography. Should I stick with my Z system or switch to Sony? I've used both in the past and prefer Nikon's color and menus. The recent news of Nikon falling down is also putting me off from investing more into the Z system. If you have a Z8 please give me your feedback!
>>4524082Fujiworms are a thing of the past. I now import my fuji raws directly into lightroom and they look better than XTransformer demosaics. LR is finally my only program
would it be technically possible to control ISO and shutter speed (if electronic) on a per pixel basis?
>>4523753>iso is just the exposure slider in photoshopholy retard
>>4523765With more and more linear ISO invariance sensors it pretty much is, you might get a second base ISO at 400 or 600 where thenoise reduction hardware kicks in but pretty much any high ISO shot is just this base ISO digitally clipped and exposure increased, very similar to increasing the exposure slider. The noise will be the same, all exposure properties will be the same. It has been for 10 years.
don't know where else to ask this but you lot seem savvy enough What is the easiest way to have a GPS app running on my phone while shooting photos, and then I dump the photos and the geolocation data to my computer and have the nearest/interpolated location attached to the EXIF of each photo?
>>4523318>>>4523318>control ISO and shutter speed (if electronic) on a per pixel basisWhy not do in post process on the raw pixels? Cannot see a different outcome.
>>4523778Dual conversion gain sensors are not noise reduction hardware you dunning kruger ass schizo retard snoyimIts basically turning off a high dynamic range circuit that stores more charge to switch to a more sensitive and less noisy one that cant store as much charge but detects finer increments. Noise reduction is what pentax does. No extra light is stored. No extra shadows are detected. Its just a noise reduction slider on a chip for when the camera processor is too weak to run a good NR algorithm. Modern sensors read both of these circuits simultaneously (sony a7v, lumix s1rii, om om1ii) or sequentially (lumix g9ii).
Is it worth to get into concert photography? I'm big into metal music and there are weekly shows in my town big and small. Also huge festivals nearby in summer. Instead of sitting on my ass at home lurking on 4chan or flickr.. should I give it a try? I have no portfolio yet so it might be best to start with smaller local bands and ask if they want some free photos. If I search for photographers in that area, they all are really mediocre, especially the post editing. I wanna become the Greg Williams of metal music. My main goal isn't money, though that would be a nice addition later on. What would suck though is if this is as oversaturated as soemthing like wedding photography. What do ya think? Anyone with experience? is it fun?
>>4520682>It was an awful effect in the 60s and 70sBeing a flaming homosexual is against the rules, bro
>>4520742also looked him up and honestly I dont really like his photos lol
>>4520435I literally can't think of anything gayer than photographing other men
>>4520686yeah you'd have to be press, but if you were to tie the photos to live show reviews or music blogging you could bend the rules
>>4521002faggotry was no longer considered a mental illness by 1973 and you can thank flower power summer of love hippie 60s bullshit for that
hey /p/ i have a canon m50 mark iii am planning on using it for youtube vlogs and stand alone videoany advice on good settings or if you have this camera what setting didi you put on it ?i copied the settings from a woman's video years ago but cant re find ithow fucked am i?
>>4522959Hey anon.You should match the frame rate and shutter speed to 1:2 ratio. Also set Clarity to soften or sharpen the overall look of the shot.The M50 is sufficent for most video needs. Lighting is always more important than the camera. A fluid head tripod or gimbal are also more important than the camera itself.Don't copy women. Look online for videos that have different looks, find one you want to imitate, then work backwards to find out their gear and settings.You're only fucked if you put zero effort in. Do a bit of research and spend a little money on appropriate auxillary gear. The zoom lens might be a bit shit, but the 22mm f2 is universally praised and would give you a classic wide-angle FoV.
>>4522959>make the best APSC system>kill itWhat did Canon mean by this?
>>4523175Should have kept EF-M as the APS-C lineup and RF as soley full-frame.
>>4523175>make system that covers the needs of like 90% of camera buyers with NO upgrade path towards your expensive fool frame lineupTotal suicide.
>I never photograph anything I don’t believe in. If I love working with death, it’s because even in death I find this power of reality that no sculptor or painter could recreate, not even a Michelangelo or a Da Vinci.
>>4523746This is what happens when you can't think more than 1 layer deep
>>4523669>Israel = R1A (jews, turks, greeks, and other aryans)Lol, I'm R1a1a1 and 98 % Finnish, 0.7 % French German and 1.1 % Broadly Northwestern European.
>>4523746Try again. Put that world-famous IQ to work.
>>4523791>>4523761>actually, i am very intelligent because my excuse is slightly differentmessianic Jews crack me up>atheist jew: its beautiful because its about how the body is just a body man. cool photography right?>messianic jew: DEMONIC! i pray to corpses to uhh reflect on gods grace instead. YOU ARE DESTROYING BEAUTY!>actual jew: wtf is wrong with these people
>>4523804>>4523761
/p/, I long for the 2000s. I miss the hangouts where someone always had a digital camera and was snapping away. I miss that sweet overexposed, sharpened, sometimes saturated look that naturally came from a digicam. Please post candid photos from the 2000s like picrel. The more unique the better.If you need help, go to Google Images and search (month) (year) and the word "flickr"ex - June 2005 flickr
>>4515018dude no one is lining up, they’ll get a digital copy in the millions MAYBE in the cities, New York or LA, but it will be some heavily publicised and controlled event.
>>4515021Don't under estimate GTA fans, these are the same lunatics that were charting the stars to try and figure out when the trailer would drop. All it needs it some special edition box with some physical garbage in it and they'll line up beyond an entire city block.
>>4501803I know that lady
>>4522143tell her i said hi
>>4522150She said to tell you that you're breaking the injunction
Remember when everyone would come to this place to post fun photos and critique each other? We can and WILL have fun photo generals here again and not just another gear threadYou do actually take photos with those expensive cameras you're buying, right anon?
>>4523580
Bridges EditionFormer: >>4517511
>>4522821Absolute kino. I feel I should have hopped into the car to drive to the sea, must have been amazing to see such an eclipse sunset over the sea's horizon.Made a new /rpt/ thread as the current one is over image limit>>4523061
>>4522368what even is this
>>4523081Pretentious as all get out and a shallow use of Christian iconography
>>4522561Better. And, although flares are often bad in a picture, this one works since it supports the fact it was night. Now, work on your picture telling a story.
>photography hero grows oldIt's not fair bros
>/p/ has it's own schizo jew
>>4519143>board for the most jewish hobby and art form, primarily defined by the artistic contributions of jews, effectively the national sport of israel>you get btfo if you deny the holocaust while repeating the gaza genocide liesay it aint so
>>4518953Say Christ is king.
>>4520285His name was Rabbi Yeshua bar Yosef HaNotzri, actually.
>>4518953Well on one hand, the number of casualties is impossible given the time frame of the alleged atrocities and the resources available at the time; but on the other hand, 6 million dead is too low for what they deserve.
>Sepia toning is a chemical photographic process which changes the appearance of black-and-white prints to brown.>Most digital cameras and photo software include a sepia filter to mimic the appearance of sepia-toned prints.Post your sepia photos!
>>4516168You've got color banding like that SOOC? What the fuck.
>>4516245>>4516248New camera so just taking a lot of goof around jpegs to see what happens. That plus the underexposure seem to be what's doing it, I'll continue to experiment. Don't remember if I used a recipe.>>4516235Glad you like it.
I've never been able to perceive the sepia tone look as anything other than a corny novelty color mode that comes stock on a Motorola Razr. None of us lived through the american old west, why do we keep this weirdly specific pastiche alive in digital cameras?
>>4523452honestly this. sepia just seems worse than straight bw
How can a portrait represent something about someone other than mere appearance? Can you draw out an internal character or trait from compositional elements?
>>4523222Depends. If they've been posed or told to have a certain expression, it doesn't express who they are.
>>4523222Everybody has idiosyncrasies, ways to move or do things in a manner that is specific to them.They can be real tell-tale signs of a personality.A good example is how people sit.
>>4523222How can actors act and be anything other than themselves??
>>4523335Demonic possession?
