So i got a beat up point and shoot. And shot my first roll. Super nice. But thwn I opened the back, because I didn't know how to wind the film. I did this multiple times. Eventually I found out, but now I am scared of getting it "out" because it cost alot of moneyWHY IS PHOTOGRAPHY SO EXPENSIVE I LIKE IT BUT TOO MUCH MONEY
>>4475608>spending more money to make the same jpegs will make you a better photographerBut that dog hair fag is the worst photographer on /p/, and the best photographer on /p/ (ambush) uses a dslr and spends his money on travel
>>4475109You seeing it yet?
>a judging world each other full for of sinning sinners differentlyWhat
>>4475615I am waiting til muh next salary to develop it i will either send it here, if the thread is alive still. Mods plz dont archive.>>4475608Yeah thats what i thought too. I used to have a digicam, it looked good, but not in a warm way. Its ez to shoot on digital tho. But I'll stick to film as i am trying to get into scrapbooking.Film just looks so cinematic, in a way that digi doesnt. Yes digi looks good, especialy the ones with like 4 megapixels. I like the way white is blown out. But it looks cold. Film looks warmer. Im using kodak gold so I think it will be fire Plz mods keep this one alive so that I can post results
>>4475542Op here, its not the same. I have shot digi and it is absolutely not comparable. Digi is just more available thats it
Who the fuck likes this focal length? What is its purpose?
>>4476133>The eternal an unceasing seethe you generate is truly something to behold. Truly magnificent.Thanks anon, it's taken quite some time to cultivate so I appreciate that you can appreciate it :)
>>4476014>DISTANCE to subject influences distortion, and FOCAL LENGTH influences background compression.Not really. And that's what i'm talking about how people became so ignorant.Distance tricks perspective. Focal length tricks mere field of view. Take picture with 28mm, crop the center in 50mm or 100mm or 1000mm and compare with actual 50 or 100 or 1000 lens's picture. The only difference will be the field of view, how wide or narrow the picture.In other words, in wide picture there is narrow focal length's 'compression' always. You just have to crop it to make it prominent to notice. It's like people saying people using umbrellas causes rain. Same in muh Portrait Lenses.Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>4476051Not a counterpoint, f/64 viewed the Pictorialist style as inherently antisemitic and fascist with no justification>the Jew fears the soft-focused titty
>>4476155So do you have have any of your tracking shot examples to share with us?
>>4476240real? based pictoralists
Including birds with tails and front legs.
Image limit reached>>4474697>>4474697>>4474697
>>4476575>denoising made it slightly better while reducing the filesize by half, because noise = additional visual information that cannot be optimized easily by JPEG's algorithms. So not only do you make you photos worse by not denoising them, you are also being a cunt to everyone else who has to download your noise for no good reasonKek, this is a new copypasta it's so retarded and full of NPC cope.
>>4476639Lmao it's like listening to a junkie justify sleeping in the gutter to spend his money on heroin
I shoot M4/3 and pretend to shoot FF to fuck with you.
>>4476893we know lol
>Bruce Gilden takes a photo of you on streetHow'd you react?
>>4476210let me guess. your hometown is flint, michian?
>>4476219Of course i am a little bitch, why else would i punch a jew for snapping my picture? doesn't mean i wouldn't do it but you would be right in my lack of seeming escalation. >>4476227I can drink the water here so no
>>4476236https://youtube.com/watch?v=0aVt09WatYERelevant kek
>>4476243Should have figured you were the type to consume that content, schizo.
>>4476028Break his nose then his camera.
I have way better gear but this little fucker has become a great companion for vlogging, even with all the drawbacksDo you have a favorite flawed piece of gear?
>>4474903>just buy a cameraThe average NPC out there wasn't doing that anymore. Sony was trying to save the industry.>Making a camera and taking away the LCDYou left out step 3, the trickiest step. Replace LCD with a fag phone and closed APIs. That was innovative, because no one else was doing it.
>>4474747>>4473808ok snapiness
>>4473622I have one, they are quite ok but they are almost a decade old now. It is one of the few actioncams that has optical stability instead of digital which means that in lower light there isn't that weird jitter effect you have with digital stabilization. This type of model with a 1-inch sensor would have been a great successor.
I got this, and YouTube makes it seem cool, but the cocksucker keeps automatically rewinding rolls after like 4 shots and I don't understand why.
Ricoh RDC-300It has really nice character for one of these ancient digital cameras and works surprisingly well in low light. My only wish is that it had a bit of zoom on it. It's also tiny, and looks enough not like a camera that no one really pays attention to you.Second place goes to my converted CCTV camera. It's very unwieldy to carry around, but there are a lot of fun c-mount lenses around for cheap. I use it as a webcam and soldering microscope occasionally.
why must the sky be so beautiful
>>4473106+1 skyfag
The sky is beautiful indeed
Magnificent really
Hi, can you guys help me? I'm trying to understand what makes the colors in these photos appealing. Is it the saturation, the yellow light from the Sun, or something else? Thanks
Digicucks btfo time and time again by a piece of funny plastic
>>4470293
>>4470294id happily lick the sand from her feet
>>4470293so pretty much what >>4468222 saidGiven that it's not made anymore, just use whatever fresh slide film you can get, and consider a polarizing filter as well.And since E100 is basically all you can get now you might also want a warming filter for that.I've heard even Gold 200 with a polarizer can give similar results so that might also be worth a try.>>4470298based
Where do (you) host your /p/ortfolio?
>>4463794We are returning to family photos and albums. Just took some photos of my cousin's first grandchild and made some prints for her.. it is how to enjoy photography these days. Sharing with frens and family.
Right now Cargo but I'm not a huge fan. It's ok. I want to rebuild it with a static site generator but I haven't had the time.
If you are booking paid work you need Instagram, if you are using Instagram and not booking work you are the dictionary definition of brain dead. For all other purposes Flickr does the job.If you have massive narcissism you will need to create your own website but that’s a you problem.
>>4474622this is based but requires to have a social life. something that is rare on this site
I have a self hosted instance of immich. Does the job. Just link to an album
What's the appeal of this photo do you think that made the editor to choose it for promoting an exhibition?
>cANON is a diesel merc shillI can imagine him squatting on the hood of a 300SD drinking vodka in his adidas tracksuit
>>4475795Honestly if I were a paranoid schizophrenic I'd probably drive an all mechanical diesel too in case there's an EMP or some shit.
>>4475755 You don't need an external lightmeter all the time if you learn sunny 16., plus I mentioned other issues with the M6 such as the corroding zinc top plate. It's not a bad camera at all, and yes all of the potential issues can be mitigated and/or ignored, but I think it's still one of the worst value M cameras.A great condition M4 costs maybe 1500$-1800$, meanwhile an equivalent M6 can be up to and above 3k. That's potentially another grand or more for a light meter.>>4475768I think if you're going to spend upwards of 5k on a camera body it should last a lifetime. My problem isn't with digital Leicas failing, it's that they are priced as if they are still these flawlessly engineered mechanical devices which are built to last.Leica lives on the laurels of its analog years, not on the merit of their current digital cameras.
>>4475178I think the picture is quite interesting. How old is that woman? She could be 23 or 53. And why is everyone dressed like it's 1970 when the photo was clearly taken in the present day? When, in normal life, would you ever see a guy in the street carrying a smartphone in one hand and a fucking pen-and-paper notebook in the other hand?>>4475190I've seen one other version of this copypasta on /sp/ and I thought the poster had just written it himself. I had no idea it was a meme. I will now have to go and find the original.t. board tourist; this thread was on the front page of 4chan so I thought I'd check it out
>>4476246>I think the picture is quite interesting. How old is that woman? She could be 23 or 53. And why is everyone dressed like it's 1970 when the photo was clearly taken in the present day? When, in normal life, would you ever see a guy in the street carrying a smartphone in one hand and a fucking pen-and-paper notebook in the other hand?Just because you've never been outside doesn't make this an interesting photo. By your logic every single snapshit that has a random person in it would be deem interesting.The clothing attire is explained by old people.The smartphone and notebook is not noteworthy in the slightest.
>Tried rangefinder camera for the first time>Yashica_Electro_35_GTN.jpg>Felt absolutely like shit to shoot>The shutter sound boring>Felt awkward to holdRemind me again why people like film rangefinder? Not to mention that my friend bought it used and the quality of the viewfinder itself is quite terrible. so like, why? Do I need to try Leica or something?
>>4451975I like using my Olympus XA rangefinder, mainly because it's tiny and I can carry around in a pant pocket for random family photos whenever we go out.I have no interest in lugging around my SLR when we go to a diner or concert.>>4467778There's a weird amount of people that consider the "feel" and "sound" of the shutter and film advance to be a significant factor in how much they like a camera.IMO the only things that matter are ergonomics, features, and image quality.
>>4451975DESU I'd recommend you do try a Leica. Just go to your local Leica store with your credit card and a roll of film. ask them to look at some of the cameras. Eventually ask to look at one of their film bodies. After you chat with the salesperson for a half hour or so, ask them if it would be possible to do a walk around with the camera. You will need collateral, a card that can cover the camera if you lose/steal it, or gear insurance for rentals that would cover it in case of loss.I regularly walk around with their bodies and it's always an enjoyable experience, just remember that it's polite to buy something every once in a while. I usually pick up the latest issue of the LFI magazine while I'm there.While I do like their film bodies, I also tried a digital rangefinder that had no screen. It's quite literally the closest you can get to shooting film without having to actually shoot film, although I really enjoyed my experience with the MP. Nothing beats the feel and ritual of shooting film.
>>4451975maybe find that epson rangefinder with voigtlander no need develop film
>>4467572>IT'S DA JOOS
>>4467572the street is full of whatsimpsons
Hey guys! I've been shooting a DIY documentary in the observatory mode for over a year now about a local band. Throughout the year, I've shot the band throughout their everyday life and interviewed the members one-on-one in talking head segments. I plan to intercut the "fly-on-the-wall" moments with the talking heads. However, I can't think of any other documentaries that have done this off the top of my head (with the exception of Tiger King). I'd like to watch a few films in this style so I can get a better idea on pacing/editing. Do you guys have any documentary recommendations in the observatory mode with talking-head interviews? Especially if it's a music doc? Thanks!!!
>>4473964npr small studio does this all the time
Glad I held off getting the iM20 because this looks like the TTL flash of my dreams, especially since I like the Uncle Terry look It's pretty cheap, should I buy it? Inb4 buy an ad
Anons i'm thinking i'm buying this. >79usd>GN20>2 AA batteries>USB C. not outdated 5 pin>Creates sharp jaw line shadowI think it's much better pick than those godox ones
At least from now, no one's gonna to look for an used fuji's over priced 400usd EF-X20 meme flash. and fuji's GN is even 15.
>>4475499>the boxy shape of FlashQ FM2 compliments the iconic look of rangefinder camera
You may need a hotshoe riser for those Godox mini flashes. If your lens is too large it will block the flash.
>>4475988Only really applicable if you shoot Sony and dont have small primes
Hello 4chan! I'm creating a horror project in roblox related to SSTV, and I don't know what pictures to add. For the Robot 36 mode, I have already made both regular images and really frightening ones. Can you help with the selection of images? Memes, Google Maps places, creepy pictures, and just throw pictures of anything you want will do.
>>4475977Anything in particular?
>>4475978
Throw anything, I will choose the most suitable
>>4475979
>do work for me for freeno
God this photo by Pedro Martinelli makes me feel things you wouldn't believe. Ah, the open twisted road, cool breeze, bike, sun intensely shinning after a strong rain and thus giving the whole atmosphere a mysterious aura. You can see nothing but the road, you want to drive away from all of the shit, there is only road, all else is black. >"I licked my finger and stuck it in the air. The wind was coming from the south. From the same direction my life was heading."-anon on /lit/, post No.24705860God I love photography so damn much. There is a whole damn novel in this photo.
>>4473652>fondling a dead child is fine because the parents made a bad choiceFeds need to check your drives.
>>4473664dude it was just a brown child. no one cares about those. there's billions of browns in the world.
>>4473668>dude it was just a brownoid>op pic is of a brownoid
>>4471657>autistic dipshits arguing over what's a "real" photo, while not posting a single photo themselvesnever change, /p/
>>4473681What's the contradiction?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4JgaSjzGkJ0I was kinda surprised to see that he isn't even using any form of stabilization.Kevlar, Canon RP, EF to RF adapter and a 50mm F1.2 EF lens. That is pretty much it.
>>4473559Watched the video. Basically it's street, but you're more likely to get shot, shelled and kidnapped. Also your camera suffers more wear.Shooting nothing but manual seems like a flex. Cool that he's shooting in war zones so that I have pictures to go with my morning news, but I think most YouTube reviewers give better gear advice than this guy. It's clearly not his forte.
>>4475759Q.E.D.: the whole hiding the SD card is a 2010s thing. Most of the places this guy is at have mobile service. A modern body can push photos straight to the cloud via a mobile hotspot as you shoot making this a non-issue.
>>4473657>he doesnt know what maid is
>>4473624I was in Afghanistan and we had these big Kodak digital back modded blads, a few F3s and a shitload of Nikonos V’s. The Nikonos’s were basically a point & shoot, but 1, that was what we needed instead of dicking around with settings all day like the F3s, and 2, holy hellin damnin ass if those Nik V’s weren’t as close to indestructible as Jesus and his 3 hot sisters ever came. You never hear much about the sisters, but shyyyyet he taught em to suck a mean dick and build a mean camera.
>>4475939Your a zogbot
