[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/p/ - Photography

Name
Options
Subject
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


New anti-spam measures have been applied to all boards.

Please see the Frequently Asked Questions page for details.

[Advertise on 4chan]

[Catalog] [Archive]

File: 1729261407842148.webm (1.97 MB, 720x1280)
1.97 MB
1.97 MB WEBM
How do I take good pics of myself without hiring a photographer?
30 replies and 6 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4378012
I prefer a good f/3.5-4, anything wider starts to give me strong senior portrait vibes.
>>
>>4378013
Also depends on focal length too, but 2.8 is usually my go-to.
>>
Get a camera, a lens, a tripod, and a cable release. Maybe some lights if you’re feeling fancy but you can work with natural light. Use windows and muslin diffusion, or even a shower curtain. Check out pixy Liao, she’s a big time artist who pretty much just does self portraits with her boyfriend. Her lighting is on point tho, that’s sort of the be all end all of photography. So toss in a Profoto and a modifier like a soft box or octa (or an ultra bounce and a 6x6 with some rags if you wanna go cine style and don’t care about spill.
>>
>>4377841
Australian pedophile
>>
>>4375173
it's ai genned right? hard to tell with all the compression
ai draws a "better" picture using your snapshit as a reference
looks like shit usually but people like it

File: PA190115s.jpg (2.08 MB, 4820x3329)
2.08 MB
2.08 MB JPG
GAAAAAAHHH
WHAT FUCKING BAG FITS A 5D WITH A BATTERY GRIP
I HAVE 20 CAMERA BAGS AND NOT ONE OF THEM FITS THE FUCKING THING
I HATE BACKPACKS!!!

>unrelated pic from last roll

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeOLYMPUS CORPORATION
Camera ModelE-M1MarkII
Maximum Lens Aperturef/3.5
Image-Specific Properties:
Exposure Time1/125 sec
F-Numberf/4.5
Exposure ProgramAperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating250
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length30.00 mm
White BalanceAuto
ContrastNormal
SaturationHigh
SharpnessNormal
11 replies and 1 image omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4375486
IS THAT NUKE DOOKEM? I THINK SOMEONE USED A SNOY TO TAKE THIS PHOTO?
>>
Sony sucks
Panasonic sucks
Canon sucks
Nikon wins

Simple as
>>
>>4377808
they're good on paper, but something about them, maybe the retardation on the owners means that there has never really been a good photo taken with one. they all look like ken rockwell, crooked, oversaturated boomer slop. they also get circle jerked for "muh build quality" but in reality we all know they're about as good as minolta, so about 4th or 5th place in that respect.
>>
Domke.
>>
>>4378011
nikon actually has really bad color science and the persistent tilting is because nikon has a decades long qc problem with viewfinders not being level

sony and canon are unsurprisingly the best, although sony dslrs are criminally underappreciated because their lens selection was so basic (canon still leads snoy in lenses)

File: ikonoskop_acam_dii.jpg (17 KB, 494x340)
17 KB
17 KB JPG
post weird cameras
11 replies and 7 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4375881
so you can project the picture and take it a second time
to relive the moment
>>
>>4376383
I wish the gifnigger didn't give up by the bottom right
>>
>>4377063
>celebrated
by who? are they notoriously horny people with a tendency towards schizophrenia perhaps?
>>
>>4377916
So based people?
>>
File: tichy_tits.jpg (55 KB, 460x515)
55 KB
55 KB JPG
>>4377063
Tichy made his own gear - that's the opposite of gearfagging
lived like a bum to be invisible to society - that's based
was arrested multiple times and locked in mental ward for harassing roasties - even more based

File: IMG_4106.jpg (97 KB, 649x634)
97 KB
97 KB JPG
Want GRiii
>$1000
>from 2018
>sold out
>no alternatives
Ricoh won’t announce gr4
What do?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width649
Image Height634
Scene Capture TypeStandard
7 replies omitted. Click here to view.
>>
File: R0000024.jpg (1.47 MB, 1707x2560)
1.47 MB
1.47 MB JPG
>>4377381
the gr3 is a disappointment. don't get it. or get it only if you can return it for full price

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeRICOH IMAGING COMPANY, LTD.
Camera ModelRICOH GR III
Camera SoftwareCapture One 23 Macintosh
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)28 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Exposure Time1/100 sec
F-Numberf/2.8
Exposure ProgramAperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating2000
Lens Aperturef/2.8
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length18.30 mm
Image Width1707
Image Height2560
RenderingCustom
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
ContrastHard
SaturationNormal
SharpnessHard
Subject Distance RangeMacro
>>
>>4377849
There's a stock shortage atm so I'm selling mine for a profit keklmao.
>>
>>4377849
is this the same gearfag with the om5
>>
>>4377859
that's clearly a cat
>>
>>4377940

https://youtu.be/X7x_m58c_7Y

How the fuck he did it bros? HOOOOOOOW

For me Edward S Curtis is an absolute towering mammoth of 20th century American photography. What a fucking genius.
231 replies and 40 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4377203
Rich motherfucker. Enjoy anon. I'm jelly.
>>
>>4377318
It's only 20 eurobucks anon, I'm sure you can afford that too
>>
>>4377337
I won't buy that shit it looks horrible. They have utterly fucked the kino sepia tones of Curtis.
>>
>>4376188
>f/64's "objective" cancer
I do have to defend that group because their objective was pure sharp focus but not necessarily "objective" or palpable reality (other than Dorothea Lange's efforts at photojournalism) they often played with the illusion of whimsical settings that made you question the reality itself of it or so to say, Adams was notorious for shopping the light and shadows to create this effect, he never hid that fact.
Their group merely meant to distance itself from pictorial trends because they said that genre focused and mixed a lot of painting and graphic hand artistry rather than pure photography, which is ironic because Adams practically used dodge & burn methods like a graphic designer would.

Also butthurt jannitoids can't break my spirit, suck it and deal with the wrongthink, bunch of shit-eating pajeet homos

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwarePicasa
PhotographerPicasa
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2013:09:23 17:09:04
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
Image Width1500
Image Height1182
Unique Image IDe3c11f9d0b0bc717bbeaafb4e0381873
>>
>>4377788
>Their group merely meant to distance itself from pictorial trends because they said that genre focused and mixed a lot of painting and graphic hand artistry rather than pure photography, which is ironic because Adams practically used dodge & burn methods like a graphic designer would.
The entire debate was basically between "photos should be carefully staged and heavily manipulated to conform to an artistic vision" and "photos should speak for themselves" and it wasn't even really a debate because by the time f/64 was founded pictoralism was already dead out east.

File: 71Wo-GEVMVL._AC_SL1500_.jpg (157 KB, 1359x1500)
157 KB
157 KB JPG
Can I get a recommendation for a light? And can I use it as a lamp for my room or does it take too much power?
4 replies and 2 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4377468
Based and Kubrick-pilled.
>>
arrilite 800w is doable for 500
>>
>>4377468
what shitty lens. look at that purple fringing.
>>
>>4377403
Amaran 200x, has a lux of more than 50,000 which is very bright, costs about $350
>>
>>4377665
This lens is brighter than your brain during most intense thinking session

File: DDDD.jpg (385 KB, 1127x1584)
385 KB
385 KB JPG
Hi p, I developed film on my own for the first time. It was scary! The negatives came out really well though and I'm proud of them. My printer scanner makes them really ugly, even my phone does better! I have to trick the scanner into turning on the "automatic backlight" by lying to it that my negatives are color. I think it's not a very good scanner. Is there a way I can trick it into wanting to turn the "automatic backlight" up higher or am I supposed to cut the thing open and short some connections?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeGoogle
Camera ModelPixel 4
PhotographerOP
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution1 dp
Vertical Resolution1 dp
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
9 replies and 2 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
File: firstD3scan.jpg (3.08 MB, 3055x2000)
3.08 MB
3.08 MB JPG
>>4377499
Found a model for a film carrier I printed, does a very nice job but not very automated. Much happier with my D3's scan compared to the printer scan.
>>4377504
Thanks anon! I thought you were supposed to overexpose to preserve highlight on film :P whoops.
>>4377578
Thank you anon :)

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATION
Camera ModelNIKON D3
Camera Softwaredarktable 4.6.1
PhotographerOP
Maximum Lens Aperturef/4.1
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)105 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Image Created2024:10:24 17:47:16
Exposure Time1/200 sec
F-Numberf/5.6
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating3200
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash
Focal Length105.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width3055
Image Height2000
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Gain ControlHigh Gain Up
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
Subject Distance RangeUnknown
ISO Speed Used3200
Image QualityRAW
White BalanceAUTO
Focus ModeAF-C
Flash SettingNORMAL
ISO Speed Requested3200
Flash Bracket Compensation0.0 EV
AE Bracket Compensation0.0 EV
Lens TypeUnknown
Lens Range105.0 mm; f/2.8
Shooting/Bracketing ModeSingle Frame/Off
Noise ReductionOFF
Camera Actuations236638
>>


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATION
Camera ModelNIKON D3
Camera Softwaredarktable 4.6.1
PhotographerOP
Maximum Lens Aperturef/4.6
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)105 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Image Created2024:10:24 18:13:51
Exposure Time1/160 sec
F-Numberf/4.5
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating640
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash
Focal Length105.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1328
Image Height2000
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Gain ControlLow Gain Up
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
Subject Distance RangeUnknown
ISO Speed Used640
Image QualityRAW
White BalanceAUTO
Focus ModeAF-C
Flash SettingNORMAL
ISO Speed Requested640
Flash Bracket Compensation0.0 EV
AE Bracket Compensation0.0 EV
Lens TypeUnknown
Lens Range105.0 mm; f/2.8
Shooting/Bracketing ModeSingle Frame/Off
Noise ReductionOFF
Camera Actuations236644
>>
File: noway.jpg (2.7 MB, 1328x2000)
2.7 MB
2.7 MB JPG
>>4377500
:O guys look it wasn't my fault! It was all the scanner!

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATION
Camera ModelNIKON D3
Camera Softwaredarktable 4.6.1
PhotographerOP
Maximum Lens Aperturef/4.6
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)105 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Image Created2024:10:24 18:15:53
Exposure Time1/160 sec
F-Numberf/4.5
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating2000
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash
Focal Length105.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1328
Image Height2000
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Gain ControlHigh Gain Up
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
Subject Distance RangeUnknown
ISO Speed Used2000
Image QualityRAW
White BalanceAUTO
Focus ModeAF-C
Flash SettingNORMAL
ISO Speed Requested2000
Flash Bracket Compensation0.0 EV
AE Bracket Compensation0.0 EV
Lens TypeUnknown
Lens Range105.0 mm; f/2.8
Shooting/Bracketing ModeSingle Frame/Off
Noise ReductionOFF
Camera Actuations236649
>>
>>4377619
>nigga doesnt understand exposure
>>
>>4377755
Nothing he said is wrong. You're a moron. That's exactly how film works and if you owned a camera you would know.

I contribute to a small miniature wargaming/hobby Web magazine and I'm quite dissatisfied with the results I get with my crappy phone camera. I know nothing about fancy cameras or what features I should look for to take good close up photos of minis. Does anyone have any recommendations or advice on what camera I should get or what features I should look for?
12 replies and 2 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4374775
i hope this is true
t. got a tg7 on a whim for /out/ photos
>>
>>4374849
A d200 is not outdoing any phones.

Get something cmos with 20mp. Its the same price because hipster drove up ccd prices.
>>
>>4374715
A light, softbox and a light stand with a boom arm.
Better control of light should make even shitty phone sigjnificantly better. Also a tripod (and a phone tripod attachment).

If you want go camera: light, tripod, a crop sensor dslr/mirrorless kit, maybe a chink macro extension tube set. Smaller the sensor, easier to get relatively deep depth of field for closeups of small items.
>>
Well boys
Thread's over
>>
>>4374745
>cheap Tripod
No, get a good tripod. That's the most important part. And a cable release (sure you can use the timer but who's got time for that shit)
>>4374775
can't put tubes on a p&s

thoughts on alec soth?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS5.1 Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width484
Image Height640
Number of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Image Created2023:02:15 16:01:12
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width484
Image Height484
>>
>>4377683
hava nagila runs strong in his portfolio
>>
>>4377683
never heard of him
>>
>>4377683
>Fujifilm
he probably prefers the company of men

Shooting film is literally therapy for me. Saved me from suicide. But I can't afford film anymore and need to move to digital. What do I do photanons?
16 replies omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4370892
Do zoomers not know printers exist? Do they think screens are the only consumer product
>>
>>4377443
your real photograph is read out to an ADC and erased

negatives are forever
>>
>>4370721
I'll send you some bulk rolled 5222 and enough rodinal to develop it if you want. Just gotta promise me you'll contribute in fgt. :)
>>
>>4377444
meds schizo
>>
>>4377675
no, he's right.

>>4377444
stay unmedicated

File: 1680201669090906.jpg (2.91 MB, 4961x3496)
2.91 MB
2.91 MB JPG
B&W Thread because last one reached image limit.
I’m not as good as previous OP yet but fuck it here are some of mine

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeNIKON
Camera ModelLS9000 Filmstrip
Camera SoftwareSilverFast 8.8.0 r25 (Jun 25 2021) d6df961 25.06.
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width4961
Image Height3496
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution600 dpi
Vertical Resolution600 dpi
Image Created2023.03.30 17:00:51
Image Width4961
Image Height3496
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
Image Width4961
Image Height3496
92 replies and 71 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
File: DSCF0796.jpg (969 KB, 2048x2048)
969 KB
969 KB JPG


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareCapture One Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Width2048
Image Height2048
>>
File: DSCF0876.jpg (495 KB, 1365x2048)
495 KB
495 KB JPG


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareCapture One Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Width1365
Image Height2048
>>
>>4367131
Is there more than this picture?
>>
File: _1393466_01.jpg (1.18 MB, 1439x1800)
1.18 MB
1.18 MB JPG


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakePanasonic
Camera ModelDC-GH5M2
Camera Softwaredarktable 4.8.1
Maximum Lens Aperturef/5.6
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)600 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Image Created2024:10:24 15:16:23
White Point Chromaticity0.3
Exposure Time1/1300 sec
F-Numberf/8.0
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating200
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModeOther
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length300.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1439
Image Height1800
RenderingCustom
Exposure ModeManual
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Gain ControlLow Gain Up
ContrastHard
SaturationHigh
SharpnessHard
Image QualityUnknown
White BalanceAuto
Focus ModeAuto
Spot ModeUnknown
Image StabilizerUnknown
Macro ModeNormal
Shooting ModeManual
AudioNo
Flash Bias0.00 EV
>>
File: img033.jpg (1.98 MB, 4458x2826)
1.98 MB
1.98 MB JPG
>>4367131
Shot a roll of ilford ortho plus recently most of it was ass but i like this one

Is this worth the money? Worth buying used? Any real alternative for the functions and quality? Is it better than a phone that can shoot raw?
103 replies and 21 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4367612
It's a Ricoh/Pentax.
Don't expect much in the way of improvements.
>>
>>4367635
>If Ricoh continues their twelve year release cycle we’ll find out in 2027
>>
>>4373813
now do it from the side
>>
File: 81mUBkKPnqL._AC_SL1500_.jpg (188 KB, 1500x1365)
188 KB
188 KB JPG
Would these batteries be ok with a griii?
>>
File: IMGP0193.jpg (1.98 MB, 3872x2592)
1.98 MB
1.98 MB JPG
I'm looking to get a reasonably priced compact for sneaky concert photography, mainly an upgrade from canon s95 - the pictures are fine but I would something that can take more than 1 pic per second in spray and pray mode.
Right now I'm looking at Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark III just becuase it can take 30 RAWs per second. Are there any other cameras I should consider? Not intrested in sony products.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakePENTAX Corporation
Camera ModelPENTAX K10D
Camera SoftwareK10D Ver 1.00
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)82 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2022:11:11 12:47:30
Exposure Time1/25 sec
F-Numberf/5.6
Exposure ProgramAperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating200
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModeCenter Weighted Average
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length55.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width3872
Image Height2592
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
Subject Distance RangeDistant View

File: Daido - Stray Dog(1971).jpg (274 KB, 1200x941)
274 KB
274 KB JPG
In this thread we'll share brutal street photography that we like. These streets are fucking hard man

Moriyama the GOAT of hard streets
77 replies and 54 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4376948
No man they're brutal
>>
>>4371223
You samefag in every thread and always reply in caps when called out, lol. Why do you think your photos are so good? They are shit.
>>
My contribution
>>
>>4377007
>>
File: dt_DSCF7347.jpg (632 KB, 1925x1190)
632 KB
632 KB JPG
>>4376992
I AM A BETTER PHOTOGRAPHER THAN YOU
YOU LITTLE SHITSTAIN
PROVE ME WRONG!

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeFUJIFILM
Camera ModelFinePix AX300
Camera Softwaredarktable 4.8.1
Maximum Lens Aperturef/3.3
Maker Note Version0130
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Image Created2024:10:24 14:01:38
Exposure Time1/125 sec
F-Numberf/3.3
Exposure ProgramNormal Program
ISO Speed Rating200
Lens Aperturef/3.3
Brightness4.4 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length5.90 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1925
Image Height1190
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
SharpnessNormal
Subject Distance RangeUnknown
SharpnessNormal
White BalanceAuto
Chroma SaturationNormal
Flash ModeOff
Macro ModeOff
Focus ModeAuto
Slow Synchro ModeOff
Picture ModeProgram AE
Continuous/Bracketing ModeOff
Blur StatusOK
Focus StatusOK
Auto Exposure StatusOK

File: maxresdefault.jpg (192 KB, 1280x720)
192 KB
192 KB JPG
What should be your goal when post processing/color grading?
106 replies and 25 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4372780
>>4372774
>>4368692
>>4368688
>>4368435
Perhaps I should make this clearer than I did in the OP: I did not take these pictures. I found random RAW's on the internet, purposefully with flaws, so I could try to make them better through editing. For editing practice.
>>
>>4372774
Most wedding photos I've ever seen are straight up bad. Whenever someone posts them on social media I am shocked by what wedding "photographers" are getting away with. It's actually insane
>>
>>4357677
Eyes lose the ability to see color over time, so over-saturated stuff becomes the new normal
>>
>>4373219
Fair. If I spent longer than 60 seconds on it I would probably have done a bit more NR and resized it among a couple others.
>>
File: dt_DSCF7441.jpg (1.15 MB, 1570x2093)
1.15 MB
1.15 MB JPG


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeFUJIFILM
Camera ModelFinePix AX300
Camera Softwaredarktable 4.8.1
Maximum Lens Aperturef/3.3
Maker Note Version0130
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Image Created2024:10:24 13:19:44
Exposure Time1/280 sec
F-Numberf/5.9
Exposure ProgramNormal Program
ISO Speed Rating200
Lens Aperturef/5.9
Brightness7.2 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length29.50 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1570
Image Height2093
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
SharpnessNormal
Subject Distance RangeUnknown
SharpnessNormal
White BalanceAuto
Chroma SaturationNormal
Flash ModeOff
Macro ModeOff
Focus ModeAuto
Slow Synchro ModeOff
Picture ModeProgram AE
Continuous/Bracketing ModeOff
Blur StatusOK
Focus StatusOK
Auto Exposure StatusOK

Is it worth dipping my toes in?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
9 replies and 1 image omitted. Click here to view.
>>
File: SDIM1264.jpg (1.78 MB, 3136x4704)
1.78 MB
1.78 MB JPG
>>4377481
NTA but, I think people blame the ISO performance, even though it doesn't matter for most conditions you'll be shooting it in.

I think the real problem with them was the lens selection being very limited to either extremely heavy and optically very nice or trash with no in between. There are also some obvious holes in the lens line up (like an 85mm equiv. prime)

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeSIGMA
Camera ModelSIGMA SD1 Merrill
Camera SoftwareSIGMA Photo Pro 6.8.5
Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)31 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution180 dpi
Vertical Resolution180 dpi
Image Created2024:03:22 11:52:31
Exposure Time1/1600 sec
F-Numberf/6.3
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating100
Lens Aperturef/6.3
Subject Distance12.67 m
Metering ModeSpot
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash
Focal Length21.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width3136
Image Height4704
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Unique Image ID303035303739373797DDF06334344543
>>
>>4377483
>I think people blame the ISO performance
they're unusable above iso 400, you might as well just shoot film at that stage
>>
File: SDIM0309.jpg (2.75 MB, 2000x3000)
2.75 MB
2.75 MB JPG
>>4377484
>they're unusable above iso 400
only if you lack any creativity and sense of aesthetics.

>you might as well just shoot film at that stage
>it's like film without needing to spend money on rolls or development
How is this a problem again?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeSIGMA
Camera ModelSIGMA SD1 Merrill
Camera SoftwareSIGMA Photo Pro 6.8.5
Maximum Lens Aperturef/3.5
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)55 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution180 dpi
Vertical Resolution180 dpi
Image Created2024:03:21 21:51:17
Exposure Time1/30 sec
F-Numberf/3.5
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating6400
Lens Aperturef/3.5
Subject Distance3.93 m
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash
Focal Length37.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width3136
Image Height4704
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Unique Image ID30303530373937370E89A76336384241
>>
>>4377485
>just convert your high iso (800) pics to b&w!
>being limited to one style is part of the creative process!
foveon is just bayer with less capability, at least film is unique
>>
File: SDIM2762.jpg (2.53 MB, 3136x4704)
2.53 MB
2.53 MB JPG
>>4377488
>just convert your high iso (800) pics to b&w!
I knew you would say this.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeSIGMA
Camera ModelSIGMA SD1 Merrill
Camera SoftwareSIGMA Photo Pro 6.8.3
Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)187 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution180 dpi
Vertical Resolution180 dpi
Image Created2023:07:06 23:38:51
Exposure Time1/60 sec
F-Numberf/2.8
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating800
Lens Aperturef/2.8
Subject Distance20.31 m
Metering ModeSpot
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash
Focal Length125.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width3136
Image Height4704
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Unique Image ID30303530373937379A20A76431413232


[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.