[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATIONCamera ModelNIKON D7000Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.0Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaColor Filter Array Pattern870Focal Length (35mm Equiv)52 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2018:02:26 22:14:41Exposure Time1/40 secF-Numberf/3.5Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating500Lens Aperturef/3.5Exposure Bias-1.7 EVMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length35.00 mmCommentCopyright Mike EckmanColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width4561Image Height3021RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlLow Gain UpContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
>>4396183OP here- I’ve got that Pentax PC35 AF and it’s very nice though showing it’s age with wear and tear. What are some other models (preferably with glass lens and manual action) that can be found cheaply on places like EBay?I’ve also got the manual Minolta Memory Maker which is also nice but I believe has a plastic lens.
>>4396183they're all the same /thread
>>4396183>hey I wanna snap up a bunch of cheap 35mm film point n shoots before their prices exploded because zoomers are retarded and I too am a zoomer myself>what should I buy since I refuse to research for my flipping businessThe one you have with you
All point n shoots give you pretty much the exact same image. The only differences are body design and gimmicks.Pick the coolest one to you, nothing else matters.
>>4396183Contax T3
>>4396197>>4396191They’re not all the same. I’m really asking which ones have glass lenses since my Pentax has much clearer images.
>>4396222Only an extreme idiot or extreme cameralet would ever suggest a plastic and glass lens produce the same images. Pure insanity.
>>4396222>>4396225Dogshit samefag. Also wtf is a "cameralet"? Lurk more. They all produce the same images.
Olympus Mu is a good one
>>4396228Second this, definitely worth the 300 or so bucks people want for them now. You should buy one right now, OP.
>>4396227>no argument >Incorrect schizo accusations>thinks glass and plastic have similar optical performanceLurk more and concession gladly accepted. :^D
>>4396227Yeah, fags. You made the evil mistake of viewing your photos larger than a postage stamp. Stop noticing things gear doesnt matter comrade. Or we send you to gulag. Sharpness is capitalist concept born of you thinking you is deserve more than you are need, without approval from party.
>>4396231>>4396233At least space them apart this is so fucking embarrassing.
>>4396234Pure cope at this point.
>>4396234>3:55 to 4:13Not samefag, schizo. Yes, some pns are better than others. The focal lengths are not all 28mm. Some lenses are superior. Some have actual exposure and focus controls. Deal with it. You will now proceed to post some cringe purity spiral shit and whine about "consoomers" and "gearfags" from your fancy computer in the largest act of irony to grace your day thus far because every 4chan fag with a hobby has the same personality (none)
>>4396235>>4396236Okay first of all if you're going into film point and shoots expecting quality you're already retarded. If you're going into 35mm film at all expecting quality you're objectively 40 iq, so lets put that to bed. And I don't know point you think you're making about the plastic lenses as almost all plastic lens cameras are disposables, and the ones that aren't are mostly all broken anyway. Not that it matters because almost every point and shoot is plastic e-waste with a dogshit lens, yes the glass ones too. They were not made to last, and they weren't made for good image quality. The closest you're going to get to SLR image quality with a point and shoot is a TVS, and then you'll be spending 8x the price of an entry level SLR with an entry level lens, for ??? reason. They still take the same film, so they're not that much bigger, especially if you get a smaller one like an OM. If you can't carry an SLR you should kill yourself. This should have been on the stupid questions thread.Also>point and shoot>manual controlsWhat do you think point and shoot means retard?
>>4396241>quality is an option>DONT EXPECT IT NOOOOO>BUY MY SLRNot buying your shite nikon fe2, gonna get a contax instead while penny pinchers seethe
>>4396248>fe2Weird that you would suggest the SLR with the worst native glass.
>>4396222Ok forgive me for not really considering barely-multiple-use plasticy focus free lunchboxes. Sure, glass lenses do make a difference. Thats about where point n shits stop differing tho.
>>4396183Cannot Autoboy F is pretty nice, in white colour Rollei 35 if you live in sunny part of the world and just go with f16 all the time can be kinda p&s and it's pretty small
>>4396183Stupid questions go here >>4391933 there is no good answer to this though. If you were serious, you'd know that a single roll of film costs more than most of these shitters at a garage sale. If you're looking for something cool/desirable on ebay, you're not going to get it cheap because every other collectorfag hipster cunt has already bought it and relisted it for $100 more than they paid for it.
>>4396267Manual controls matter especially for shutter speed.
>>4396341Who buys a point n shoot compact for manual controls? get a rangefinder broAnd i'd put that feature under gimmicks since its so rare
>>4396347People who just want to take good photos instead of following arbitrary gearfaggot rules for justifying the purchase of some shitty leica>oh thats against le philosophy of a point and shoot your camera needs to be three times larger to have one single extra dial
>>4396350Funny how I never mentioned lica yet here we are.Oh shit whats that?????<------[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS 5D Mark IICamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS4 MacintoshPhotographerAshley PomeroyMaximum Lens Aperturef/2.8Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2020:08:14 22:34:49Exposure Time1/180 secF-Numberf/11.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating400Lens Aperturef/11.0Exposure Bias0 EVSubject Distance1.54 mMetering ModePatternFlashFlash, CompulsoryFocal Length180.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width3000Image Height2000RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandard
And oh shit whats this?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:
>>4396352>>4396353Best photos you've posted in a long time
Many variables dictate trends. It seems to me like the design carries most of the weight with regards to how desirable a particular camera is, that along with awareness.Any 35mm point n shitter has potential, but those with sleek design seems to be the most sought after as these things are to a large degree a fashion statement.I saw a video recently where some dude compared a expensive hyped point n shitter with a cheapo and showed just how little difference there is, more such videos will probably come along because the amount of people willing to pay $1000 for a hyped snapshtter is dwindling by the day.Autofocus, sleek design, motorized.. that is what the plebs want the most.
>>4396183We just had a terrorist attack.Were 15 Americans were killed.And this piece of shit is blaming it on the anti-genocide protesters.
>>4396480Well, he is not….He is saying I’m a Jihadist that will incite a global intifada. So he is comparing us to palestenians, and the oligarchs in this country to Israelis. Sir, how about you make your case to the people on the other side of the screen? I don’t want to show my cock down your throats this way.
I don't know what counts as *cheap*, but I'll put in a nomination for the Olympus AF-10 Super.It's an Olympus, but I guess it doesn't get much attention since it doesn't have "stylus" or "mju" in its name. Seems to go for around $50-60 on eBay. I found mine at a thrift for under $10.It's a chunky looking, but not massive camera. Powered by either 2xAAA or a 123 battery. And the shutter makes the most wonderful sound.Takes nice pictures too.
>>4396597Thanks, thats the sort of thing I'm looking for. Any cheapie with a nice glass lens.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width717Image Height664Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>4396597Thanks for the recommendation, can you load slide film into the AF-10?
>>4397250>wasting slide film on a garbage cameragod damn you fucking zoomers trigger me so god damn much i can't even, i hate you almost as much as i hate women.
>>4397251thats how people did it back in the day fucko
>open a film thread>it's nothing but toxic waste zoomer postingI hate film fags so much it's unreal.
>>4397684Okay, boomer.
>>4396183Chinon bellami.