So this one is about horizon and field?
>>4524387kot
>>4521147O fcourse
>>4521147>feet cut off0/10, absolute shit photo. Was it taken with a toy camera or something?
>>4532524What kind of elitist shit is this. I would just assume it's a picture from the 70s.
>>4529969>>4529968>>4529966Get closer to whatever you're trying to capture. Fill the frame. Those photos have no clear subject and no composition.
I was there tooOne hek of a party
would b-roll footage, the world and society as a whole look less lame and gay if we went back to shooting with analog and digicams without any post processing that smartphones do?
>>4532363yesis there anything else you wanted to do in your thread
>>4532363I think so. I bought some really shitty disposable film camera during COVID and even modern living just looked better when looking at the photos.
Photo taken on top of Lovcen mountain in Montenegro
St Andrew Cathedral in AMALFI window
>>4516117That's tuff
>>4516019>>4516031The problem of photography. Leveling images make them more perfect but takes away the impression that it was captured just in the moment/just as seen but carefully planned and photographed. It will be discussed here endlessly due to the emotional standing people personally have, regardless of whether the photo it is level or not. Either it will be imperfect or a bit boring. No?
Could’ve been taken closer.
>>4516013>>4516117too far
Oops! EditionPlease post film photos, talk about film photography, film gear like cameras, film stocks, news, and tips/tricks in this thread.Also talk about darkroom practices, enlargers, photo paper, techniques like dodging/burning, tools, and equipment related to enlarging, developing, and printing.Thread Question: Did you pick up film as a hobby after shooting digital? Or did you just never stop shooting film? And do you do both simultaneously now (phone snapshits don't count)?Previous thread: >>4520917
>>4535435Thanks. Actually, looking for info on XG-1 on Youtube I've seen some guy showing a circuit board with suspiciously new looking caps.
>>4535435>>4535454Or maybe I'm wrong and those blue caps I saw on the top PCB were original tantalum ones, while in a video about an XG-M, there were electrolytics there (and the video showed replacing them and putting jumper wires to fix corroded traces).In any case, 200-250 Euro for a proper SLR looks like a better deal than 500-600 Euro for Pentax 17. Even if the body would need to be replaced at some point.
While I wait for this year's autumn pics.
Theme: CloudsAll photos must be taken during the current challenge month. No old or archived shots.Get creative and enjoy the process. Unique perspectives are encouraged!
I saw this while droving home from the grocery store yesterday. I'm still not satisfied with the photos I got because none of them can quite express how the clouds looked in real life - they had such volume and dimension to them, it was like seeing a bubbling angry tide coming in upside down and breaking upon the hills.
>>4520619Pretty cool it worked at all, let alone enough that we can tell sky, clouds, and a horizon of sorts.
Clouds around the eclipse
Found this one on Wikimedia Commons. It’s one of the featured pics on there. It was taken last year, March 29, during a partial solar eclipse. The clouds made it especially attractive to me.
Is photography art? Be honest.
>>4532300>ironicFuck off empress paplatrine, go get tested or something
>>4532306>not plaplatrinezoomer iq is at all time lows
>>4532307Pap as in pap smear, you walking biohazard
>>4532309Plap plap plap plap get AIDS get AIDS
>>4532220Cope
I thought freeware was a meme until I tried RawTherapee and Darktable, and quickly realized the amount of neetbucks I would've saved had I not used Lightroom sooner. I don't even take pictures regularly. Why do photographers shill a corporation with comical levels of greed?
>>4532274Tom tier post, based
>>4532233>edits photos on resolve>cinefagI feel relieved I'll never be this retarded
>>4532285>HOW DARE YOUFuck off pleb shill, Resolve is better than whatever pleb approved software you use
>>4522804skill issue
>>4527115every IT project and opensource especially has this kind of sperg that thinks that it's only his vision is valid one and he has the best ideas, the rest of people are morons and don't understand him. So he changes posiotions of few buttons, "optimizes" by removing shit he doesn't understand and proclaims it's better and faster now. Then goes on jewtube and publishes his two hours long rants.People like this should be kept in forced labour camps to be useful.
Is Neil Postman correct about the best photography being in television ads? Excerpt from "Amusing Ourselves to Death".
>>4531897Product photography and advertising have often produced high-quality images, that's for sure. But what do the images say or mean? That's a more difficult question. >>4532048ads have always sold a lifestyle gramps, stop listening to so many podcasts and read a book.
>>4532048Yep, the whole argument is> Haha isn't it funny how the best art is at the service of corporate America. That's kinda Based, amirite fellow Americans?While Americana isn't the same any more.
>>4532061They used to reinforce a lifestyle, now they actively astroturf one. To be fair jews always did but it wasn't as prevalent as today and it targeted sectors ( (((Bernays))) convincing feminists to pick up smoking)
>>4532062To be fair the book is 41 years old so it's only natural that cherrypicked passages aged like Angourie Rice
>>4532066Hey it's better to age like Angourie Rice than like Emma Watson
What's the verdict on this guy? Is he cool? Does he know his shit? Is he retarded? Am I the retard for watching his videos?
>>4531790QRD????
>>4532050NTA: Death by Emu, Spider, or Abo Petrol SnifferDon't go to the WA.
>>4532056I assumed there was some targeted threat
>>4532050he knows.
>>4532097You've been threatening him on his private messages?
This might be the most niche request, but I find a certain charm and seeing photos in dated equipment,
>>4529443I recovered some old photos on my gameboy color and they were fucking trash and unusable. Nostalgia is a fucking meme.
Ive been using a game boy emulator on my phone to take game boy camera pics
>>45294433 weeks ago, unsure how he did it https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1E2UMxauH0g&list=PL5QZN3_HZsMUxuKSjWCAaEvQOymXjT_C6&index=42
>>4531749Apparently from a short film done in 1982 called thunder
>>4531763I just watched it, pretty neat, get the feeling it might have been a frame by frame creation, not sure yet but it's interesting to think about.
nice guy but damn his photos suck
>>4530657I know. Anything to avoid actually doing real photography.
>>4530657Where did I say that? Because the post I replied to was about getting attention on your work, not whether your work was good.
>>4526441>>4526450I hate cANON as much as the next guy but you have to admit he's not wrong here
>>4530595I dress so people stay away from me while I shoot. The landscape is for me not them
>>4530606>>4530657>>4531725No, no. It's not just about fashion but also "the way that you carry yourself". The way you act and speak, your manners etc. This dude presents the image of a sleazy ny lone hipster on the street vibe. He is tapping into the audience. His work is shit but let's take the example of good photographer from ny who had both, work and personality. Pic related is Weegee and motherfucker literally looks like photographer straight out of noir novels and films. Suits, cigars, big camera, being fat sleazy slob etc. The whole mystique of a strange photographer smoking cigars and listening whole day to a police radio just shoot a photo of a crime scene before the arrival of police. You can watch the films that he made for lolz on YouTube, see his personality shines through it. This dude is tryna be a sterile, thrift store, vegan food, politically correct version of Weegee for trust fund zoomers in ny. Not the work but at least in image, it's either Weegee or Garry Winagrand or copying his millennial peer, that condom beanie wearing snapshitter from brooklyn David Arnold or whatever his name is.
"The View From Your Room" EditionPreviously: >>4530268
>>4531963Can you point to which posts are mine?
>>4531856>>4531867>>4531868>>4531871>>4531877Who the fuck cares? How can you be so fucking lazy that you can't take a memory card out of a camera without bitching and whining like a pathetic little autistic 3 year old? My camera has a working USB port and I still pull the card because I like using a card reader and it's faster anyways. Grow up.Actually you know what, I hope they make literally EVERY camera ever read-only MTP over USB as an industry standard purely to make you seethe. Even better, I hope they decide that actually, USB in general is just more potential attack surface for no reason when card readers exist, and delete the USB port entirely as an industry standard. And I hope they put a combination lock on the card door too so that you can use it even though you don't need it and then forget the combination, like the moron you are.
>>4532010>How can you be so fucking lazy that you can't take a memory card out of a cameraWhy pay for a card reader if my camera can work as a card reader? MTP and PTP are slow and annoying to use for no good reason. Your camera can be interfaced with over USB in so many different ways being able to mount a memory card with real file system access is not that big of a deal. The only retard here is you. Hell bent on defending your dying brand of choice gobbling up that corporate cock like a good boy.
>>4532023>Just take the card out of the camera>NOOOOOOOO HELP ME LINUX TORVALDS I DON'T WANNA USE A CARD READER
>>4531951>only color bit depth and actual sensor quality are inherent to a camerathat's why all full frame cameras have the same colors right.
Does anyone else here take pairs of images to synthesize depth in mages?This was taken from the Lummi Reservation looking east to Mt. Baker and the Sisters. Base was about 100 meters.
Sorry for the very late reply, but I've been pretty busy lately. In recent months, I had actually spent considerable time researching stereoscopes because I'm very interested in 3D photography and printing my work. I figure it would be a really cool gift for people if you could make a 3D image of something they're familiar with. Like, it's one thing to just see any 3D image -- It's cool, and it makes an image feel really tangible in a way that 2D can't replicate, but when it's personal and familiar, there's a whole new layer of wonder to it. Kind of akin to way you can't really appreciate extremely high-quality speakers unless you hear your own music in it, because your familiarity with the music is what enables you to perceive quality you've never experienced before. That's why it was such an interesting coincidence that this thread would randomly show up just a few weeks after my search! I'm absolutely amazed that stereoscopic viewers are so sparse. This is such a cool type of content, you'd think it would be way more common and accessible.>>4523803>Another format is "side by side" (SBS, or 'universal freeview L-R-L')Oh shit, that's really cool, actually. I wouldn't have thought of that.>>4523812Thanks for the link, I'll check it out. That might be useful when I finally get around to putting some real effort into making these. What I typically do for my own viewing is to just open multiple images and have Windows put them side by side. It's pretty ghetto, but extremely fast and easy for viewing 3D scenes you don't intend to put effort into. Picrel is another couple that I took on my vacation while on the road. Once again, it was in landscape, so the crop is pretty extreme and jarring.
>>4524733Here's that with slight adjustment saved as LRL
This is from a flyby someone posted on another forum. Combined two screen captures.
Left-right-left
>>4531042Red/cyan anaglyph
i enjoy taking pictures. dislike rising early however.11oclock is still morning tho so no biggie!>>4525703>>4526255nice colors!
>>4525459Yes.
>>4525666A Ken Rockwell
