[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/p/ - Photography

Name
Options
Subject
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]

[Catalog] [Archive]

File: IMG_9987_reduced.jpg (4.01 MB, 5184x3456)
4.01 MB
4.01 MB JPG
Previous >>4311774 (image limit reached)Wildlife/animal/zoo Photography Bread

Post your favorite shots of animals that you've taken. This isn't so much a gearfaggotry thread, but discuss your favorite telephoto lenses if you'd like.

Watersnake, Beasoleil Island

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeCanon
Camera ModelCanon EOS 700D
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2024:07:08 11:47:44
Exposure Time1/800 sec
F-Numberf/5.6
Exposure ProgramAction
ISO Speed Rating250
Lens Aperturef/5.7
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length55.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width5184
Image Height3456
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
93 replies and 81 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
File: IMG_1031.jpg (1.38 MB, 1920x1280)
1.38 MB
1.38 MB JPG


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeCanon
Camera ModelCanon EOS 90D
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.5 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/4.6
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Image Created2024:08:24 19:54:53
Exposure Time1/1000 sec
F-Numberf/5.0
Exposure ProgramShutter Priority
ISO Speed Rating5000
Lens Aperturef/5.0
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePartial
FlashNo Flash
Focal Length100.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>
File: IMG_5060.jpg (4.08 MB, 2236x2998)
4.08 MB
4.08 MB JPG


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Lightroom 9.5.0 (iOS)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2024:08:29 00:58:47
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width2236
Image Height2998
Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>
File: IMG_172519980430F.jpg (305 KB, 1080x1920)
305 KB
305 KB JPG
>>4335224
>>
>>4355472
what am I looking at there?
>>
>>4360701
A pipefish

File: 1705562403606.jpg (653 KB, 2143x1431)
653 KB
653 KB JPG
Convince me NOT to get one.
Hard mode: no bitching about the price allowed.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution144 dpi
Vertical Resolution144 dpi
CommentScreenshot
Image Width2143
Image Height1431
37 replies and 9 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4360787
Don't.

This defeats the purpose of shooting film. The development quality is atrocious and on top you're scanning with a shitty ccd scanner.

You'd have better quality with a point and shoot from 2003 or using your phone and slapping a filter on top.
>>
>>4360835
>This defeats the purpose of shooting film.
What?
>>
>>4360841
The development quality is atrocious and on top you're scanning with a shitty ccd scanner.

You'd have better quality with a point and shoot from 2003 or using your phone and slapping a filter on top.
>>
File: Photo06_5.jpg (1.57 MB, 1707x2544)
1.57 MB
1.57 MB JPG
>>4360847
>The development quality is atrocious and on top you're scanning with a shitty ccd scanner.

you mean, kino?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 8.2.1 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Image Created2022:11:22 14:28:56
Color Space InformationsRGB
>>
>>4360854
Instagram filters are not kino

Hi /p/, treated myself to a Nikkormat EL after I decided I didn't like juggling light meters on top of manual settings and focus on my Zorki-6 (well, at least not ALL the time).
Camera store guys were nice even though I was a massive sperg and I got a free Soligor 35-70 f 2.5/3.5 (no idea what a Soligor is but hey, it's free and I left all my camera stuff back home) along with a free neck strap.
:)
But wouldn't you know it, the metering is genuinely insane. I have some Ilford HP5 in here, 400 ASA, and my new friend thinks my girlfriend's dark apartment is the brightest place on earth and wants me to set my shutter speed to 500 at 2.5 aperture. I found I can compensate for it by going down to 25 (the lowest option on the camera) and it gives me values more in line with my other equipment. Which, this works for 400, but what if I want to use 200? I'm back to using an external light meter. Maybe I should've got the N8008s...

What do? Anyone have experience with the EL? I read the manual and couldn't find any mistakes I made. Is it the lens's fault? I didnt bring any other rabbit ear lenses on this trip, so I can't rule that out. Could it be a resistor inside that needs changed out? I will go back to the guys that sold me the camera tomorrow and see if they can help, and buy more stuff from them because they were nice to me, but who knows if that will pay off.
Any advice or abuse is welcome, thanks /p/.
30 replies and 5 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4355090
What did she say when you asked her why she does it?
How long do her biting sessions last?
>>
>>4355205
it's a Nikkormat FTN, sorry if I wrote something wrong. or maybe NFT? I'm pretty sure FTN, even though that's the same name as a photomic prism for the pro cameras...
idk how to read the label on this one, sorry.
I like it, and I really like the fully mechanical shutter, but the EL was sexy compared to it and I miss it. I kinda regret trading it for this one but I know it was the right choice and that Hashem designed for it to happen since the EL had an electromechanical shutter and that's treif.
>>4355228
She used to put on a cute voice and say “It's because I like you!”, now she says “Because I'm mean!” I don't really know how to comprehend it but it's adorable and mostly harmless. The longest she's done it for is probably just under 10 minutes before I distract her with something else or she runs back to her computer to read more Tyler Cowen blogs.
>>
>>4355318
oh and I would love to get my hands on those lenses, the store gave me some weird third party macro with my purchase and I went for it. should I just grab those on eBay or Keh?
>>
>>4354082
Probably has to do with battery type. Older batteries (lead based, I think?) that have been remade with lithium have a slightly different voltage or something. I can't remember the specifics, but basic throwing in a new battery that replaced an older version into an old camera causes a 2/3-1 stop over exposure from the internal meter.
>>
>>4355205
london filmfag?

Classic IG thread. Post yours, rate others etc etc. and feel free to post whatever other site you post your photos on.
228 replies and 57 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4360458
you will love more of her lol
>>
>>4348321
That shrine shot is perfection
>>
>>4360461
Typical Ukrainian coomerbait :')
I'm surprised she did not propose to show more skin.
>>
>>4360791
>coomerbait
lol...anon she took that photo of herself at the vacation, she has a photographic account and posts nice things actually
>>
>>4360802
Ok ok, I was just trolling.

File: First Person Woman.jpg (193 KB, 380x1089)
193 KB
193 KB JPG
I'm requesting recommendations for good photobooks that include writing by the photographer themselves. I've been renting some from the national library recently. Very few of them were edited or written by the photographer. I find this very odd. Seems too hands-off. Looking for examples of work where the photographer was just as capable of writing, editing and publishing as they were of taking photos.
24 replies and 5 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4356632
more like photoboobs am I right fellas
>>
Here's another question: how many photos go in a photobook, or rather, what's the upper limit; when does it get silly?
>>
>>4360827
When the printer's bill gets to spicy.
>>
>>4360829
Having never printed before, how do I determine that? I make the digital document and then forward it for a quote?
>>
>>4360831
I'd imagine they could give you a price per page (+a flat per book cost for the cover and such) based on page size, paper&print quality, colour or not, etc. before you get started on that digital document. If you have a place in mind you mail them and ask, might be a good idea to ask what file sizes they accept while you're at it.

For love of the pentaprism.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
300 replies and 96 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
File: _IGP8940.jpg (1.1 MB, 2400x1596)
1.1 MB
1.1 MB JPG
other thread finally died so I can post this here now

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakePENTAX
Camera ModelPENTAX K-x
Camera Softwaredarktable 4.8.0
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)46 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Image Created2024:08:11 13:27:52
Exposure Time3 sec
F-Numberf/16.0
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating200
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
FlashNo Flash
Focal Length30.63 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width2400
Image Height1596
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessSoft
Subject Distance RangeClose View
>>
File: PICT7415.jpg (476 KB, 1728x1152)
476 KB
476 KB JPG
I found a spyder too last weekend

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakePENTAX
Camera ModelPENTAX K-7
Camera SoftwareK-7 Ver 1.13
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)120 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2024:09:07 18:25:14
Exposure Time1/125 sec
F-Numberf/6.7
Exposure ProgramCreative
ISO Speed Rating560
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModeCenter Weighted Average
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length80.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1728
Image Height1152
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceManual
Scene Capture TypeStandard
ContrastSoft
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
Subject Distance RangeMacro
>>
File: purple.jpg (4.34 MB, 6000x4000)
4.34 MB
4.34 MB JPG
>>4357806
Another f11
>>4360336
That's good, especially with the moist mushroom and water drops. Those tend to look lifeless when very dry.
>>4360310
Oooh, the fabled 1.4/85.

Big, possibly credible preleak about the K-1 mkIII was posted recently:
https://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/16-pentax-news-rumors/472583-latest-news-about-coming-pentax-k-1iii.html

Imagine Pentax coming back with THE top of the line DSLR of all time.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
>>
>>4360430
>Oooh, the fabled 1.4/85.
it has become my favorite, mainly because I've found I really like the focal length
the actual lens — eh, there's lots of LoCA, kind of disappointing for the price
>>4360430
as long as the K-1 III has comparable AF and framerate to the K-3 III, it'll be worth it to me
happy with my mk1's sensor but I realize they have to change it, don't think I'll be unhappy with whichever they choose to replace it with
>the 4 metal rods with the ball heads are designed as telescopic rods, which means they can be pulled apart in a similar way to old radio antennas.
neat, I was hoping either for a normal flip display or this, first time I saw the K-1's rods I thought it would be cool if they telescoped so you could get more range
but also sounds like it's as sturdy as I was afraid of
>>
File: PICT7713.jpg (522 KB, 1728x1152)
522 KB
522 KB JPG
>>4358975
Here you go
https://litter.catbox.moe/msury1.PEF

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakePENTAX
Camera ModelPENTAX K-7
Camera SoftwareK-7 Ver 1.13
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)72 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2024:09:14 16:33:05
Exposure Time1/90 sec
F-Numberf/4.5
Exposure ProgramCreative
ISO Speed Rating1600
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModeCenter Weighted Average
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length48.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1728
Image Height1152
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceManual
Scene Capture TypeStandard
ContrastHard
SaturationLow
SharpnessNormal
Subject Distance RangeClose View

File: newfirmware.jpg (242 KB, 1096x1534)
242 KB
242 KB JPG
>releases new firmware update
>bricks your camera
ohnonononono!
111 replies and 15 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4360602
Yeah I do that out of necessity, but if they release it as stable, one would expect it to be
>>
>>4360604
>the airbags were released as safe
>this will totally not give you cancer
>ddt is good for me
kek trusting corporations
>>
File: sony, sony everywhere.png (186 KB, 1110x414)
186 KB
186 KB PNG
>>4360606
>Thanks for trying it out for us! no refunds.
How deep does the rabbit hole go? What else are they hiding?
>>
File: bricks.jpg (166 KB, 660x740)
166 KB
166 KB JPG
>>4359649
How will Sony bros ever recover from this?
>>
>>4360706
>Thinking anyone on /p/ actually buys newer cameras that cost more than $2k
Most would max out their credit cards, those that would not would catch shit from their rabbi
>How will Sony bros ever recover from this?
By selling their a7rv in anger to /p/ for $1750 via ebay

Hieveryone,

Post the photos you've taken on your rides. I've taken up cycling recently, here are mine. Could someone please give me some feedback? Have a nice time

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATION
Camera ModelNIKON D3200
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 9.4 (Macintosh)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/3.5
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern844
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)27 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2024:08:16 02:04:59
Exposure Time1/400 sec
F-Numberf/10.0
Exposure ProgramNormal Program
ISO Speed Rating1600
Lens Aperturef/10.0
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModeSpot
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash
Focal Length18.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Gain ControlHigh Gain Up
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
Subject Distance RangeUnknown
56 replies and 28 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4357545
Ken/10
>>
>>4348582
you take me to another place
thank you
>>
File: DSC02448 1.jpg (2.93 MB, 2102x1402)
2.93 MB
2.93 MB JPG
Why are the buildings in my photos always tilted? NEVER are they straight.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareCapture One Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Width2102
Image Height1402
>>
>>4360710
I wish I wasn't phonefagging to shoop Kens face into Ben 10
>>
>>4360729
love thisone

File: phoot.jpg (551 KB, 2048x1368)
551 KB
551 KB JPG
Is this a nicely taken photo?
1 reply omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4359291
You should consider not shooting wide open and either using auto ISO or setting ISO based on the lighting you're working with so you don't need to shoot wide open at a slower shutter speed.
>>
For stopping down, if it's dimly lit and you can't use flash you're kinda fucked. Better to try to flatten the image plane if that's the case, in this case asking the girl to move closer and the guy to hold the card closer to the plane. It looks pretty dim this photo but of course hard to say without being there. What was your shutter speed, aperture and camera model OP?
>>
>>4359291
no, since there is no balut and red horse beer.
>>
>>4359291
the person behind the camera could be giving them the middle finger. that isnt very nice.
>>
>>4359291
Go chicken find your new joy...

File: _MG_1315.jpg (1.21 MB, 5198x3462)
1.21 MB
1.21 MB JPG
Post your best bus stop photos here

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeCanon
Camera ModelCanon EOS 700D
Camera Softwaredarktable 4.8.1
Lens Size1.00 - 65535.00 mm
Firmware VersionFirmware Version 1.1.5
Lens Name1-65535mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Image Created2024:09:16 10:59:29
Exposure Time1/400 sec
F-Numberf/2.8
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating100
Lens Aperturef/2.8
Exposure Bias0 EV
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length65535.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width5198
Image Height3462
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Exposure ModeManual
Focus TypeAuto
Metering ModeSpot
SharpnessUnknown
SaturationNormal
ContrastNormal
Shooting ModeManual
Image SizeUnknown
Focus ModeManual
Drive ModeSingle
Flash ModeOff
Compression SettingUnknown
Macro ModeNormal
White BalanceAuto
Exposure Compensation3
Sensor ISO Speed160
Color Matrix135
>>
File: _MG_1326.jpg (1.11 MB, 4926x3281)
1.11 MB
1.11 MB JPG


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeCanon
Camera ModelCanon EOS 700D
Camera Softwaredarktable 4.8.1
Lens Size1.00 - 65535.00 mm
Firmware VersionFirmware Version 1.1.5
Lens Name1-65535mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Image Created2024:09:16 11:15:54
Exposure Time1/1000 sec
F-Numberf/2.8
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating100
Lens Aperturef/2.8
Exposure Bias0 EV
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length65535.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width4926
Image Height3281
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Exposure ModeManual
Focus TypeAuto
Metering ModeSpot
SharpnessUnknown
SaturationNormal
ContrastNormal
Shooting ModeManual
Image SizeUnknown
Focus ModeManual
Drive ModeSingle
Flash ModeOff
Compression SettingUnknown
Macro ModeNormal
White BalanceAuto
Exposure Compensation3
Sensor ISO Speed160
Color Matrix135

File: RF28_70mm_F2_8_IS_STM.jpg (154 KB, 1600x1369)
154 KB
154 KB JPG
>new Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM lens
>smallest and lightest constant f/2.8 mirrorless FF zoom with image stabilization
Canon won.
56 replies and 16 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4359772
u mad?
>>
>>4360216
Reckon you got any value out of it over say the 24-105 USM f/4.5-7.1? Consoomer RF lenses are all significantly slower and I hate it.
>B-b-but IS! So light! Control ring!
My old EF telephoto is a stop brighter than the RF equiv. Which is a joke.

All I'm saying, is you probably did the right thing by getting that L if you use it enough. Buy once cry once.
>>
>>4359274
>I would rather use micro four thirds than a cannot POS R. at least the small zooms are weather sealed.
I would rather nophoto nocamera shills stay off the board.
>>
>>4360651
>Nophoto bitches about other nophoto
Many such cases
>>
>>4359514
Are you retarded or something? Literally every mount has variable aperture zoom lenses.

File: Image 21.jpg (1.8 MB, 6000x4000)
1.8 MB
1.8 MB JPG
Aa am ii a talented photographer?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwarePixelmator 3.1.7
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width6000
Image Height4000
21 replies and 17 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
File: Image 38.jpg (2.1 MB, 6000x4000)
2.1 MB
2.1 MB JPG


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwarePixelmator 3.1.7
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width6000
Image Height4000
>>
File: Image 40.jpg (2.65 MB, 6000x4000)
2.65 MB
2.65 MB JPG


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwarePixelmator 3.1.7
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width6000
Image Height4000
>>
File: Image 43.jpg (2.68 MB, 6000x4000)
2.68 MB
2.68 MB JPG


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwarePixelmator 3.1.7
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width6000
Image Height4000
>>
>Aa am ii a talented photographer?

No. No you are not.

In fact, I think you would have achieved better photographs if one of your Turkish immigrants rode past on a scooter and stole your phone out of your hand, then somehow triggered the camera while trying to unlock it with his kebab grease and lube smeared fingers. Who am I kidding. The last time Germans were focused and had dynamic range was 1941.
>>
>>4358056
nice softness and colour to this one
>>4358057
and this one
>>4358059
rooms what euros? too busy
>>4358060
standard roof posting
>>4358061
horizon is all sorts of fucked, but otherwise ok
>>4358689
too dark, could be good with an edit
>>4358692
blurry af
>>4358694

Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.

File: maxresdefault.jpg (192 KB, 1280x720)
192 KB
192 KB JPG
What should be your goal when post processing/color grading?
48 replies and 11 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
File: 100_5903_01.jpg (3.52 MB, 3954x2966)
3.52 MB
3.52 MB JPG
>>4360379
And the after. The before is straight off the memory card on a fairly entry level camera from 2010 that was dropped often

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeEASTMAN KODAK COMPANY
Camera ModelKODAK EASYSHARE M550 Digital Camera
Camera SoftwareNX Studio 1.7 W
Maximum Lens Aperturef/3.5
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)28 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2024:09:15 08:09:43
Exposure Time1/200 sec
F-Numberf/3.5
Exposure ProgramNormal Program
ISO Speed Rating64
Lens Aperturef/3.5
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length5.05 mm
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
Image Width3954
Image Height2966
Exposure Index64
RenderingCustom
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Gain ControlNone
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
Subject Distance RangeUnknown
>>
>>4360381
Isn't editing digishit pics sort of missing the point of digishits?
>>
>>4360387
no, its using what you have instead of consooming
>i need to buy a new camera for the jpeg converter and raw noise levels! -consoomer gearfags
>capture one to topaz my lumix gf1 and canon powershot everything now -smart people
>>
>>4360428
I mean there's definitely some sharpness and AF differences, but I was doing it to fuck around. My camera phone at the time took better photos (OnePlus 7), but I also fell for the sovl meme and realized photography is more difficult than just point and shoot. Most of the pics I took inside the coliseum and museums I went to all fucking suck and honestly aren't worth keeping either. Hell even a lot of the landscape/street photos are out of focus

My Nikon Z50 mogs FUCK out of this as it should, but it made me appreciate point and shoots for the simplicity and ease of carry. It's hard to carry this thing nearly as easily as any of the options I mention below, 2x with the 50-250 lens on it. I'm keeping a eye out for a cheap high end point and shoot, probably a $3-400 Sony ZV1, RX100 III, or a Ricoh GR. Maybe a Lumix GX85 and stock lens. There IS value in something between a APSC/FF ILC and a camera phone, especially if your camera phone fucking sucks at photos or you want a telelens for any actual focal length
>>
File: 1726402363053428.jpg (636 KB, 3166x2375)
636 KB
636 KB JPG
>>4360379
>>4360381
whipped this up in a couple of minutes

new gopro just dropped... how long do they usually wait to do price drops on the old models?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Softwarepaint.net 5.0.13
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution96 dpi
Vertical Resolution96 dpi
11 replies omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4356366
> a re-engineered battery connector specific to HERO13 Black

you can tell it was an indian who proposed this, there is 0 reasons to do this. Now people have to buy another bulk set for their multi action camera kit.
>>
>>4356366
GoPro Hero2 was the last GoPro worth buying. Everything since has been trash.
GoPro has never made proper software btw.
>>
Bought a Max 360. How badly did I fuck up?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
Image Width500
Image Height500
>>
>>4360386
Eh it’s old and the insta360 has really come out ahead as a better camera, but at the end of the day best 360 camera is like best turd, you know? The footage is all gonna be kinda shit but with the 360 gimmick.
>>
>>4360457
>The footage is all gonna be kinda shit but with the 360 gimmick.
I think I see what you mean. Still, after trying it out, I'm kinda digging it. It's a pity I got it so late, would have been more fun during a proper summer.

File: maxresdefault.jpg (124 KB, 1280x720)
124 KB
124 KB JPG
>shits on Canon
>his YouTuber supermodel girlfriend is a Canon shill

What do these people mean by this?
12 replies and 1 image omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4357386
I swear I'm the only sane non-faggot Australian in this country
>>
>>4357631
Oh yeah, which country?
>>
>he gets paid by sony
>she gets paid by cannon
>neither had actual opinions
>>
I hate this teal and orange retard so much.
>>
>>4357492
He is gay.
See: >>4357485
Just look at him.
Doesn't take an AI to know.

Gays often have a "girlfriend" (fag hag) to cover up the fact that they're gay with plausible deniability. "Nah bro, I'm not gay, check out my girlfriend!" and she plays along.

>>4357560
You hate influencer faggots and grifters.
Most actual photographers don't have YouTube channels or social media or any Adobe software.


[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.