New here starting to explore surrealismPicture was shot on a camera modified for full spectrum[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.3 (Windows)Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2024:11:02 13:24:19Color Space InformationsRGB
another one in black and white[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSONYCamera ModelNEX-7Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.3 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/5.6Focal Length (35mm Equiv)229 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2024:11:08 20:49:08Exposure Time1/500 secF-Numberf/5.6Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating100Lens Aperturef/5.6Brightness9.4 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceOtherFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length153.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandardContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormal
>>4382290>>4382296>>4382324I agree with you, anons. Any recommendations for photographers with “integrity”? Last year I started shooting only black-and-white JPEGs straight out of camera, and I’m enjoying the hobby more than ever.
>>4385829>shooting only black-and-white JPEGs straight out of cameraWHY?
>>4383204>Most photographers aren't artists their just a techician that knows how to use a tool.that can be said for every artist out there. well except postmodernists who literally throw shit at a wall. other than that all artists are just dudes who are really good at using tools. (yes, I said dudes because there's no serious female artists - females flock to postmodernist art and smear period blood on a wall)
I found a great deal for an R7 and everything looks good, except for the battery recharge capacity being 2/3.I'm a hobbyist and would use it primarily for street photography and wildlife. But I'd to also do professional portrait photography in 1 or 2 years.And I don't really do video, but would learn the basics, since it has IBIS.What do you think of that camera?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiColor Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width860Image Height860
>>4385976>Dude, OP said he wanted it for wildlife in the second sentence.And I made it clear that it would require optimal lighting regardless. >>4385974>Interesting, here the R8 costs more than the R7.Where is over here?
>>4385973OP could get one of those meme f/11 super telephotos. They're not any more expensive than the RF 100-400mm.
>>4385977Our market is fucked mind you. But the only time I've seen an R7 cost less is on deep sales. Used market is also similar. R7s going for like $1500 AUD but R8s staying around $2k.
>>4385974>Artifical lighting can cause banding at high shutter speeds 1/1000th+I shot indoor sports using EFCS in dismal lighting conditions and never noticed any banding.
>>4385972Not for me. I use HSS about 80% of the time.
What's the glowy effect on this photo? Always been after something similar[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiColor Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width2000Image Height1500
>>4385909old or super shit lens with lots of spherical aberrationadapter projector lenses, helios lenses, super expensive leica/voigtlander lenses
>>4385909Consider a rodenstock imagon. It provides controllable softness/glow. You could go even harder with the glow if you wanted.
>>4385909It's called >I forgot to clean my lens+filter for half a year
My takumar lens looks like that
>>4385909vaseline or spit on the lens
I present to you, marvel of landscape photography... Rhein, the second!>That'll be $4,300,000.00 + tip
>>4382825>a thread in which autistic teenagers and groomers discover that prices are determined by what someone is willing to payyou can sperg out all the day but in the end someone thought this image would provide enough value for him to justify the $4.3 million cost. my guess is that you get a way better ratio laundering your money this way than in other ways
>>4385905/m43/ was but that's sadly gone as all the bakers have been banned or became crypto bros
>>4385908>have $8 million drug money>inofficially pay $8 million to shekelberg & stern auctions co. ltd.>officialy pay $4 million for that photo>use photo as collateral for a loan to officially buy stocks/crypto or invest in real estate>after a few years holding this piece of shit your stocks and investments are worth $8 million>not even try to sell that $4 million photo because you know it's worthless so keep it as collateral for loans
even reddit is ahead of you incel retardshttps://old.reddit.com/r/artbusiness/comments/19216qj/paint_get_appraised_repeat_secure_bank_loan/
>>4385772why not?
How the fuck he did it bros? HOOOOOOOW For me Edward S Curtis is an absolute towering mammoth of 20th century American photography. What a fucking genius.
>>4375195feel sorry for op, posts kino photography of natives and the thread gets colonized by retards
You may find it interesting: https://archive.org/details/edwardscurtisnor0000unse/page/30/mode/2upRegister, then you may use archive-org-downloader.py to get an offline version.
>>4380685I feel sorry for OP because he has to resort to posting photos taken by another man.
>>4382685>this bullshite againYou people have worms in your brains. Please see >>4376018
>>4375247Cahokia Jazz deal with this topic. Neo Noir detective mystery set in alternate history USA. Shitty story development, and cringy action sequences, but it's got fantastic word building to bring it out of mediocrity.
>have only a budget phone with shit camera>absolutely horrible at taking photos anyways>no experience with editing>no photos with friends/family that I could useWhat can I do? I've been thinking of asking random photographers I find on net to take photos of me in nature, probably grab a few changes of clothes to switch between too. But idk, it's probably gonna be extremely expensive and they will only agree to take the photos in their studio, which is gonna be cringe af if I ever use it for dating app profile.Any ideas?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Width1170Image Height758
>>4385764Seriously thisCanon in any era has always used sensors 2+ generations behind and it shows
>>4385768Low end quality, high end speed. Since day 1. Canon is a sports photography brand. Their entire proposition over nikon was putting sports needs first. Nikon maintained compatibility with studio/art fags old gear at the cost of hampering their development of faster cameras. Canon revamped their entire product line to fuck those guys over and focus on professional sports photography. Even their FD mount cameras were already selling themselves as action oriented.
have a buddy take some
>>4385687>Canon 5D MkIII with kit lens / 85-100mm lens would cost more but give more ""profeshionale" results.There will be no discernible difference for his use case. What makes the difference is knowing where to place the camera, the mise-en-scène, how to expose properly, what focal length and aperture to use, how to light the scene and how to edit. Pretty much anything else is only for bragging rights.
>>4385844testing again
Is there any reason to get the XT-4 or is it stuck as the shitty inbetween for the XT-30ii and the XT-5?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:
I just got an xt4 for my first camera (which I'll be using for my own small non-photography business & travel photos)I don't have anything else to contribute I just want to see if I can b8 the equivalent of this image
>>4385525yeah but what lenses did you get
>>4385525The xt4 and a7c are the best cameras for most people :^)
>>4385505I obviously don’t mean it’s waterproof you fucking sperg but unlike me the xt10 range and the Xe range it does have weather sealing.
>>4381073Not him, but 10 years ago I was shooting and editing live theater and contemporary dance videos with two Lumix GH3 cameras, paired with a 12-35mm f/2.8 and a 35-100mm f/2.8. That’s a 5.6mm FF equivalent.I did the work, even with some of the shows being under pretty dim lighting, and got paid well for it.Don’t obsess about gear, it’s all about how you use it.
I need to learn how to edit photos, Show me what I could be doing please, Currenty fucking around in Darktable, and lightroomgofile.io/d/7hlW1x
>>4385429meowfag
>>4385428>doesn't post his own editsuck my dick, bitch boy
>>4385500i did. it also sucks ass - you can guess which one it is lol.
>>4381570FOSS is crap, Adobe is fucking expensive.DxoPhotolab is a reasonable choice if you don't need to work with layers.
>>4385817Not him but I tried the demo and rotating photos was extremely laggy, it was basically impossible to do fine adjustments. It was awful. UI was pretty lackluster too.
Are there any reasons to choose A7IV over A7III?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSONYCamera ModelNEX-5NCamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 10.2 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.8Focal Length (35mm Equiv)75 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution47 dpcmVertical Resolution47 dpcmImage Created2022:01:18 17:11:05Exposure Time1/250 secF-Numberf/1.8Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating1600Lens Aperturef/1.8Brightness1.2 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length50.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardContrastSoftSaturationLowSharpnessNormal
>>4385784Heres the big dump of already debunked lies again, next up, reposts. And yet panasonic still makes the worst cameras.
>>4385792no hes right and hes going to repost the same 5/5000000 broken a7iiis to prove it!
>>4385792No canon makes the worst cameras. Imagine losing the AP, britains PA, the canadian press, reuters, and USA today to sony and just being left with getty and the NFL. Reuters was with canon just last year and then BAM, snoy’d. No one has lost harder than canon. They gave away free R1s at the olympics and all that happened was people preferred sony.
>>4385798well sony cant compete with canons consumer sales so there. you will never have a sony R50.
>>4385792>>4385795>>4385798>>4385801>I'M DEBONKING!!![EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Width1934Image Height598
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpi
>>4385734We live in a society
>>4385734The middle bulb made me kek
>>4385734>even the end bulbs are fake incandescents with just LED strips where the filaments would be, and look worse from casting those big dark shadow-lines aroundi hate this world
In this thread we'll share brutal street photography that we like. These streets are fucking hard manMoriyama the GOAT of hard streets
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon PowerShot S95Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2023:09:10 15:30:50Exposure Time0.4 secF-Numberf/2.8ISO Speed Rating400Lens Aperturef/2.8Exposure Bias-0.7 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length8.56 mmColor Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width2100Image Height1400RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandard
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon PowerShot S95Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.0Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2024:06:02 15:29:35Exposure Time1/13 secF-Numberf/2.8ISO Speed Rating80Lens Aperturef/2.8Exposure Bias-1 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length6.00 mmColor Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width2100Image Height1400RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandard
>>4383510>>4383511>>4383515>>4383517Yeah, /p/ee has just pissed another brutal photographer. Good shit You need to go even more degenerate. Shit like this >>4383512 with ketchup is too mundane. Cultivate the soul of city dwelling urbanite scum who can murder someone and looks through the bullshit with his feverish gaze.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATIONCamera ModelNIKON D5000Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.2 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/3.5Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaColor Filter Array Pattern780Focal Length (35mm Equiv)27 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2024:11:13 00:16:32Exposure Time1/50 secF-Numberf/4.5Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating3200Lens Aperturef/4.5Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length18.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlHigh Gain UpContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
>>4383515that one is not too bad with that ribbon flapping in direction of flapper it even carries the message of some sort
Should I get rid of this old gear?It's a Canon 5D mark II.What other camera or brand should I be looking for?Is Sony A7IV any good?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakesamsungCamera ModelSCG07Camera SoftwareAdobe Lightroom 9.5.0 (Android)Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.0Sensing MethodNot DefinedFocal Length (35mm Equiv)25 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2024:09:30 23:06:33Exposure Time1/30 secF-Numberf/2.0Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating400Lens Aperturef/2.0Brightness-1.0 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageLight SourceD65FlashNo FlashFocal Length4.60 mmColor Space InformationsRGBExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandard
>>4385693I functionally replaced my 50R with a Zf and haven't looked backbut I also still use my other Fuji's more oftenget the Zf
>>4385693The gfx50 is just fat full frame thanks to the ancient shit sensor, you might as well sell it, or shoot nothing else and remain ignorant.
>>4385093The ancient, 1st edition 24-70 l is actually pretty soft.
>>4385711>>4385715The GFX is my favorite camera. Love the incredible detail in prints and for my taste it resolved better than my previous A7IV.
>>4385740Of course its 50mp, so it will definitely be better than 33mp and very close to 61mp if the lenses are keeping up for all cameras, but sensor performance is the same as modern full frame. It can merely resolve as well with a lower quality lens. Dont touch a zf or a z7ii if you want it to stay your favorite.
Aa am ii a talented photographer?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwarePixelmator 3.1.7Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width6000Image Height4000
Corners of buildings.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BvsvO7CwPO8[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwarePixelmator 3.1.10Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width6000Image Height4000
>>4383448What if it's a cloudy day?
needs more building corners
You are the most talented photographer on /p/
Post your favorite painterly photos with female models/actresses.I'll start
Would it be immoral to pay a prostitute to model for a photoshoot?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:
>>4385439how is it immoral if she is giving you her consent? they have been through hell so if you make them look good that will be a kind gesture.
>>4385439There's a tripfag who shoots nothing but nude prostitutes. Can't remember his name though.
>>4385566I would love to see his work.
>>4385668>>4385668I do a lot more than nudes, I've only ever actually done them a few times and I've never shot actual hookers, most of the people I've worked with are either exotic dancers or friends. The majority of my body of work is actually landscapes and truckersnaps.>>4385439You're seriously asking about the morality of paying someone not for sex to take pictures of them and they don't have to spread their legs.These are some of the best people to work with because they are already comfortable with being nude in front of other people, and they're already expecting you to try to bang them. Which, you shouldn't use your camera to get laid and shits gross, at least with a prostitute it's part of the deal.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATIONCamera ModelNIKON DfCamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 8.2.1 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.4Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaColor Filter Array Pattern822Focal Length (35mm Equiv)50 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2021:02:19 21:02:06Exposure Time1/125 secF-Numberf/2.8Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating1600Lens Aperturef/2.8Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length50.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlHigh Gain UpContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
>Cheeto Dust Covered Bee Edition1. Macro is based2. Anything lower than f/16 is useless, anything over f/8 causes diffraction (we don't care)3. Get a flash of some kind if you're doing handheld macro, get a softbox if your lighting is too harsh (it is)4. 1x magnification can be overkill. Nobody cares if you hit 1x or greater, if it's framed like shit5. 200mm for bugs, 100mm for all-purpose, lower focal lengths are memes6. Extension tubes are cheap enough to dabble. Stick them on something between 50-200mm and go to town7. Gear posts are allowed but keep it on topic8. Any macro is encouraged. Bugs, plants, textures, minis etc. all welcomePrevious Thread >>4342854[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS R50Camera SoftwaredigiKam-8.4.0Firmware VersionFirmware Version 1.1.0Lens NameEF100mm f/2.8L Macro IS USMImage-Specific Properties:Image Width1512Image Height1512Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution350 dpiVertical Resolution350 dpiImage Created2024:10:22 15:17:02Exposure Time1/250 secF-Numberf/20.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating100Lens Aperturef/19.9Exposure Bias0 EVFlashFlash, CompulsoryFocal Length100.00 mmImage Width1512Image Height1512RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualScene Capture TypeStandardExposure ModeManualFocus TypeAutoMetering ModeEvaluativeSharpnessUnknownSaturationNormalContrastNormalShooting ModeManualImage SizeLargeFocus ModeOne-ShotDrive ModeSingleFlash ModeExternal FlashCompression SettingFineMacro ModeNormalSubject Distance0.340 mWhite BalanceAutoExposure Compensation3Sensor ISO Speed160Color Matrix129
>>4384014Seems like she has been looking for attention in a few different threads. Pretty sad behavior.
>Wakeup because it's 3PM in STRAYAM8>Let's look at /p/ while I sink some tinnies>One retarded fuckhead swinging around his cock ruining multiple threads.Mate, I really need you to listen and pay attention to what I'm about to say. You need to kill yourself. No part of the world is better off with your involvement.
>>4385260
>>4384245No. >>4384014I am sorry for hurting your feelings but you need to stop projecting and start taking better photographs. >>4385260Kino
