First time taking photosDon’t have a camera yet so used 3ds I think this one looks quite nice
>>4534673And a homebrew app that allows you to shoot in raw as well.
>>4522350I like this a lot
>>4534665art
>>4522350>>4522349Looks a lot better than m43 really
dead board
"Attack of the MILC" EditionPreviously: >>4535937
>>4537300>Sure, you’ve seen the source codeNo anon, I've seen the output. The bricks photo is pretty damning.
>>4537299That's not why I find the prospect of a machine being seemingly imbued with soul so terrible. It's because of the type of scenario seen in Vice, which is sci fi schlock but asks some rather poignant questions.
>>4537313You saw a sloppy global moire correction. Its the EXACT same chroma smoothing fuji uses that generates gray lips and beige eyes Fixing more in post is a last resort. Use the correct lens for the job and use it correctly. OLPF fag and fix it in post fags are both retarded.
>>4537353>Use the correct lens for the job and use it correctlyKek how about I use a sensor that doesn't give me gay rainbows instead faggot?Never had that problem shooting Fuji btw, my only complaints are the overly pink skin tones and the ugly greens. >tfw fell for the provia memeNever againThere's a reason their best selling stuff is instax
>>4537392>moire can happen, so all my lenses need blurred!Just dont use a G master to take photos of brick walls and test charts. AA filters are inferior to natural lens blur anyways.
I always feel a little dirty when a photo looks good in greyscale but not in color
>>4537104It's because it's ugly grass and ugly light. At a different time or using some filters it could look better. Maybe just with a shifted balance. Don't be afraid to not have whites be neutral whites, it's art not journalism.
>>4537127>you know what this picture of nothing could really use? even less The fence was barbed wire and I'm not about to get myself shot by some third world cow rancher >>4537145>shifted balance I do not "edit", I do not "color correct", I take these in the default camera app on an iPhone 8 and if it looks like shit I click the Vivid Warm button
>>4537219Oh dear.
>>4537141Since you hate photography you know that posting here is optional right
>>4537219>I take these in the default camera app on an iPhone 8 and if it looks like shit I click the Vivid Warm buttonStill looks like shit.
Soft EditionThe aim of this thread is to discuss compact digital cameras (digishits) and share photos from them.If your digishit has a "soft" picture mode, take some photos with it and share them in this thread. Feel free to share your digishit photos taken in any other picture mode, too.Previous Thread: >>4477534
olympus c5050z
Powershot a400
Canon Powershot A580my first real camera, been having alot of fun with it.
The DIY joy of reflex edition, this French madman Denis Mo actually made his own SLR from scratch.Previous: >>4535009
cANON has posted zero photosHuskychad has posted many photos (including when he dogmogged cANON in a photobattle) https://archive.palanq.win/p/thread/4526676/#4526760Therefore until cANON photomaxxes and mogs the dog, doggo-toggo’s advice reigns supreme >>4536585 >>4536574 >>4536572
>>4536617>cANON has posted zero photosI have posted photos and directed you stalkers with countless clues to find them. Yet you can't. I don't think you want to.
>>4536623Different anon. No one else seems to have trouble uploading their photos (or simply linking to their own posts) when prompted. In fact, I've never seen anyone else be so insistent on giving vague directions as plausible deniability like you have. I will dig through the archives to link to my own posts, and I don't even make a habit of arguing with people here like you do.
NEW THREAD!>>4536628>>4536628>>4536628
>>4536268is it true that if you know composition and have an understanding for lighting you can take better photos than most people for the most part?
itt: post your non-standard color photos. your lomo turquoise, your harman red, your aerochrome, and all the like. I guess if you do weird stuff with your digital sensors that's fine too.shot a roll of kono donau II last weekend, its a blue monochromatic c-41 film rated at ISO 8.
>>4526564
>>4526562>>4526564>>4526565I'd say great job
DigitalSima Soft Focus
bump
>>4515564All of these are so cool man! How did you make these? Can I use these for my cover art?
rate my film snapshits from my Vietnam tripshot on a Ricoh GR1
>>4518201Great thread, anon, I enjoyed it.
>>4518291This is good
>>4525344It was hot and humid and the little led screen of the Ricoh GR1s that I had just bought from eBay stoped fully working. But those cameras are not known for their reliability. I had a Ricoh GR1 screen fully go out one time when I was in Bali but it then started working again after a few days.
Kino threadLovesd the night shots >>4518249>>4518255>>4518280>>4518282>>4518283
>>4520333terrible opinion and edit>what is negative space?
KENTMERE PAN 400
>>4535884I wonder what he's using that makes lights flare as flat disks while having the sources in focus. Some filter I guess.
>>4535714>
>>4535879Well, I haven't thought of it that way. I'll make a new thread next time I have more than a few photos to post. There is nothing of value in the catalog anyway.
>>4536249
>>4535714I also got a few rolls of KP400. I have two rangefinders that need testing and since I already enjoyed shooting KP100 and KP200 I figured this is a good film to test with and I can develop myself.I assume all these were shot on 35mm film, right? The grain doesn't seem too bad.
>it now cost $20 to develop film only with no prints or scansAHHHHHHHHH
>>4535572>good enough for me>"nooooooo that's not allowed!"God you're such a whiny faggot. Do you have any actual friends? I'd be astounded.
>>4535573What I'm proposing is nearly zero cost if he already has a DSLR in America, you can get a slide duplicator for under $15.
>>4535572But it's still free...
>>4535600Free as in free beer not as in freedom. I find older film scanners to be vastly superior, even humble low res ones like the Kodak Pakon.
>>4481467i just learned there's a hipster studio/cafe near me because of your postof course, they charge 20$ to develop film and i have no idea how long it'll take but it's less expensive than mailing rolls to californiai'll have to check them out in the morning, maybe they're my kind of faggots
Here are 5 randomly chosen words. Create a photograph that incorporates as many of them as possible.Just one is fine, but more is better.No rules, time limits, or pressure. Put as much or as little effort into it as you want. Have fun and contribute!
>>4535989Nice.
>>4535989That's an indifferent and out-of-focus cat.Did you read the OP?
Seoul dump. Feel free to dump your seoul photos.1/106
>>4535905Back in the day people interested in photography became photographers. The message of mirrorless is "you don't need to learn shit, we got your back" so they learn helplessness instead of the exposure triangle. When the crutch inevitably fails them, they ask for a new crutch. They are kept in the plantation.
>>4535907You protect the lamp highlights in a poorly lit scene making everything worse in the name of zebras. Read The Negative by Ansel Adams.
>>4535911That doesn't even affect DR at all.But you're arguing with an autist who thinks he "skilled" because he follows "rules", without the capacity to even stop for a second and try to figure out what those rules actually mean or why they exist. It's like arguing colors with Ken Rockwell. There is no cure for autism, sadly.
ITT unskilled auto mode high ISO snapshitters whose fool frame camera snaps barely look any better than mfturds>BUT I USED THE MODERN FEATURES OF MY SNOY!
>>4535971Meanwhile all your shots are blurry and has bad exposure, and you missed all the crucial moments because you were just randomly spinning three dials at night.
Meds editionPrevious: >>4534229
>>4535903>>4535906So you clearly bought an abused damaged unit and now you are crying all Pentax are shit. Gotta be a very special boy to do that.
>>4535902Skill issue
>>4535934You're pretending the Minsk thing is real don't be obtuse
>>4535934This here is Argentinian beer, how did I obtain this if I'm in Belarus?
>>4535937>>4535937>>4535937new
How to avoid diffraction with my camera?
>>4532942It's clearly a troll thread, he's talking about flare which looks like it was added in post with how uncontrolled it seems.
>>4532948what is a flare? anyway the computer has no way of telling what is and what isn't a light source
>>4533042correct, that’s why all pixels in a photo or video are the same brightness
>>4532948It's just a streak effect filter. Basically a clear filter with parallel lines on it.
buddy has never heard about anamorphic lenses
I want to start a /p/ monthly, or tri-monthly, photo competition where the prize is actually desirable and relevant to photography: film rolls. Of course, they’ll be cheap, readily-available film stock like Ultramax 400 or Gold 200, or whatever else is easy and inexpensive to get ahold of, but the problem is this: how shall voting stay honest, and how shall the winner’s address stay anonymous when I send him the prize? I don’t want the poll’s integrity to be compromised, nor the winner’s anonymity. Who has some ideas for how this could be set up?
>>4535827I've got a nice and fun idea for a thread. It could either be a competition or just for fun/as a creative exercise. Should be accessible to anyone with a camera. If there is enough submissions maybe we vote on the best one after a month of whatever.Ill make the thread later today probably.
>>4535834Who cares? There's no stakes, and votes will be manipulated without taking care to set up an actually secure system for deciding the winner of /p/'s coveted "recognition." Of course, nothing I say could dissuade you from an idea you're so confident about. Please, go ahead with your thread. May it be blessed.
>>4535851Here it is! :D>>4535860I hope to see your contribution. I think the board is missing fun things like this, really.
>>4535861It's a good idea, gets people thinking. A prize would make it even more engaging.
>>4525631>The color accuracy/honest photography faggotwho?
Be honest, we all have at least one
>>4535690I've been here for a few years and I'm not familiar.
>>4535687>>4535694The probe macro guy
>>4535674He was too based for this board
>>4535662This board has doxed and in at least one case swatted people.Funniest one was when someone found a Flickr with Ayya's old photos which was in a man's name and they tried calling her out as stealing from it so they accidentally outed her as trans. Passing really well these days, btw.
>>4535674>preachy gearfag schizo attention whore commits self-btfoThey never learn
