>>4378766
Yes.
>24-70mm f/4, 50mm f/1.8, 100-400mm f/5.6-8
And around in circles we go

>>4378766
Yeah, but before switching you should buy bitcoin with the money you get from selling your gear. Imagine the gains.

Sell your gear and go fuji or leica and like two F2 primes.
or..
Sell your gear and go ricoh gxr
or..
Sell your gear and get info fi- nvm
or..
Sell your gear and get a hassy with a digital back
or..
KEEP your gear and get an old piece of shit flea market digishit for 5 bucks and use only that for a while.

a few "different" options for ya

I think I'll quit photography

>>4378785
Okeidokey. That's completely fine too.

>>4377575
Is this joking that the lenses I picked would be filled with mold, or serious?

>>4377575
>>4377726
Probably because of “Cabi” in the OP. “Kabi” means “mold” in moonspeak.

>>4377726
Both. Good lens choices, and see >>4377730

35/1.4
70-200

>>4372614

He's right, why not a Df, same sensor as D4 and weighs 1/3 as much

>>4378721
idk i want the big fatso battery grip and dat fps

bump because /p/
loves brownnosing
lardass tripfags

>>4372349
>gearfag/=/experienced photographer
Unless paying whores to take their pictures counts LOL

come on!
dont think about the lard
hes a tripfag
he deserves your obsequience!

>>4368839
>HOLY SHIT
FATSO

>>4376734

I deserve a lot of things but that's probably not one of them.

>>4371897

This is a photography board, if they had balls they would post the bad stuff too like I do. I'm not afraid of a harsh C&C and back in 2011 that's how it was before shitsux, you would get absolutely butt blasted but then they would point out where you went wrong instead of having a sperg moment about you tripping on an anonymous Mexican free tail bat enthusiast board.

New bread in the works I've been busy at work running my tits off in the process of buying a house so I haven't processed much and I'm still way behind.

>>4377818
Are you unable to take interesting photos without easily identifiable humans in them? You might just be a street photographer.

>>4378121
Umm autistic people rise up?

>>4378016
I just started developing the film. I still got to "scan" them and convert them. Hope to make a thread soon

just do urban landscapes or street with no ppl.

>>4378576
This
Industrial theme it. Power lines, cracks on the pavement, vacant parking lots, dumbster fires.

File: dt_DSCF3398.jpg (1.56 MB, 1836x2972)

1.56 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	FUJIFILM
Camera Model	FinePix E900
Camera Software	darktable 4.8.1
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Maker Note Version	0130
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2024:10:05 08:46:00
Exposure Time	1/480 sec
F-Number	f/2.8
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	200
Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Brightness	6.0 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Spot
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	7.20 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1836
Image Height	2972
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown
Sharpness	Normal
White Balance	Auto
Chroma Saturation	Normal
Flash Mode	Off
Macro Mode	Off
Focus Mode	Auto
Slow Synchro Mode	Off
Picture Mode	Program AE
Continuous/Bracketing Mode	Off
Blur Status	OK
Focus Status	OK
Auto Exposure Status	OK

File: 010122035966.jpg()(6ECF30(...).jpg (206 KB, 1559x1138)

206 KB JPG

>>4365977

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS2 Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2012:05:09 17:04:41
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	1559
Image Height	1138

File: dt_DSCF7095_01.jpg (1.24 MB, 1222x3666)

1.24 MB JPG

herons love architecture

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	FUJIFILM
Camera Model	FinePix AX300
Camera Software	darktable 4.8.1
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/3.3
Maker Note Version	0130
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2024:10:15 14:55:59
Exposure Time	1/500 sec
F-Number	f/5.9
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/5.9
Brightness	9.1 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	29.50 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1222
Image Height	3666
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown
Sharpness	Normal
White Balance	Auto
Chroma Saturation	Normal
Flash Mode	Off
Macro Mode	Off
Focus Mode	Auto
Slow Synchro Mode	Off
Picture Mode	Program AE
Continuous/Bracketing Mode	Off
Blur Status	OK
Focus Status	OK
Auto Exposure Status	OK

File: dt_DSCF7118.jpg (858 KB, 2036x1467)

858 KB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	FUJIFILM
Camera Model	FinePix AX300
Camera Software	darktable 4.8.1
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/3.3
Maker Note Version	0130
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2024:10:14 12:34:36
Exposure Time	1/160 sec
F-Number	f/3.3
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	200
Lens Aperture	f/3.3
Brightness	4.8 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	5.90 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	2036
Image Height	1467
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown
Sharpness	Normal
White Balance	Auto
Chroma Saturation	Normal
Flash Mode	Off
Macro Mode	Off
Focus Mode	Auto
Slow Synchro Mode	Off
Picture Mode	Program AE
Continuous/Bracketing Mode	Off
Blur Status	OK
Focus Status	OK
Auto Exposure Status	OK

bump

File: IMG_6727-HDR-2s.jpg (2.14 MB, 5610x3740)

2.14 MB JPG

>>4374855
>>4375176
>I can't get this quality
Those have quite moody, lighting. The look you want is evening sun, single point perspective. With single point perspective you really need to pay close attention to your lines in your image being straight, and hopefully you can find some left-to-right symmetry as well. In the first image, I would have moved the camera a bit to the right so the beam in the centre of the ceiling is in the centre of the image. Doing this also makes it easier to get all of your vertical lines straight.

>What lens do you think I can use to get a photo like this
Aperture won't matter, since you'll ideally be shooting at f/8 or 9 anyway. I would get a wide angle zoom. Personally I use a 16-28mm on full frame. That way you have an extra variable you can change when framing, and you dont need to constantly be changing lenses. If you're shooting rooms in a normal sized house, wider is really useful. I wouldnt want to go any longer than 16 on the short end. Also, always use a tripod. I can't stress enough how important it is to get your lines straight. Even if I get something as good as I can in camera, I will still end up using a bit of perspective distortion in LR. Lens correction is also very useful.

>I'm about to buy a Tilt-Shift lens, and I want to know if that lens would help me solve the problem
To fix edge sharpness? No, tilt-shifts are for a unique sort of perspective correction, which can be done in post albeit at a slight cost to image quality in affected areas. Part of the reason they're not really making them anymore. As the other anon said, pretty much any wide-angle lenses are going to have some softness around the edges. The best remedy for this, if you're willing to spend the money, is a modern mirrorless full frame camera with a modern expensive lens. The shorter focal flange distance aids a bit in the construction of wide angles versus DSLR counterparts. That and they're just newer lenses with better optics.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 5D Mark II
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Image-Specific Properties:
Exposure Time	1/25 sec
F-Number	f/8.0
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/8.0
Exposure Bias	-1.7 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	16.00 mm
White Balance	Auto

File: lens-tilt-gif-animator.gif (84 KB, 600x457)

84 KB GIF

>>4374855
>>4374856
>>4375305

Look into a tilt-shift lens, or even better, a technical camera (you can mount a DSLR or Mirrorless camera to them using an adapter, you don't have to use film)

They're the only way to correct perspective in-camera, it's one of the most important photographic techniques in architecture, and it's a ton of fun
Do be aware it will also shift the focal plane though, so higher apertures may be necessary, but you're on tripod already

>>4375305
What distortion are you having a issue with? All of the photos you've posted look fine to me, everything is reasonably straight.

Exposure blending

>>4375684
NTA, but it looks a little bloated in the center.

File: g t 1898.jpg (183 KB, 1240x744)

183 KB JPG

>>4241034
The first known photograph of a climate girl

>>4355771
>surely due to quack doctors
We still have those, the excess death was due to unsanitary conditions along with misdiagnosed illnesses. For example back in the day the very few who had gluten problems didn't live long, leukemia was a death sentence, tuberculosis practically the same unless you lived in a salt cave to purge yourself injun-style, so on and so forth.
Only le science fags claim it was due to alternative medicine which did come into play but not nearly as much as other shit, let alone famines which did happen a lot in the old days.

bump

>>4241034
Happy Birthday!

bump

>>4378532

shave it, you bum

>be wedding photographer
>faggot couple wants me to shoot their satanic rite
>say im sick
>they say they’ll reschedule
>say i have cancer and im closing shop, refer them to a liberal woman photographer
>she shot their satanic rite on a canon r50 on auto mode
>i ended up making more money selling insurance and had more time to engage in actual photography

>>4378506
go back to plebbit retard

>>4378535
>be gay
lol faggot

>>4378546
>rescheduling a wedding to book a wedding photographer
That's one ghetto wedding.

File: 1729123501326.jpg (912 KB, 3400x2210)

912 KB JPG

>>4372497
match the camera's shutter speed with the CRT's refresh rate, or do a long exposure

>>4374673
Cozy setup, I would use CRT's myself but the whine gets me so bad. People say it goes away as you grow old but im 30 and I hear it as well as I did as a child so idk.

>>4374673
The ideal thing to do is actually divide by the refresh rate. The more samples the better.
60Hz?
Use a shutter of 1/30 (2x), 1/20 (3x), 1/15 (4x), 1/10 (6x) etc.

The use of an ND filter will allow you to do long enough exposures if 1/30 or so is too bright.

>Plushie
>CanoScan in the background
Any chance you could scan your plushie's butt and upload that?

>>4374675
CRT monitors like in my pic don't audibly whine. They run at a much higher refresh rate than TVs, far higher than what humans can hear.
I have a TV too which does whine, and yeah it can be pretty annoying, although when I'm playing a fun game on it I usually forget about the whine.

>>4374681
>The ideal thing to do is actually divide by the refresh rate.
For capturing static content, definitely, but not for moving content unless you want a bunch of overlapping mismatched frames.
>Any chance you could scan your plushie's butt and upload that?
kek, maybe tomorrow

File: 1728418447066.jpg (3.64 MB, 5184x3888)

3.64 MB JPG

what's wrong with this pic? way too dark? inaccurate colors? i used a 30 year old tv

File: DSC_0655.jpg (933 KB, 2000x1331)

933 KB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON Z 6_2
Camera Software	NX Studio 1.7 W
Photographer	BEN C
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern	1103
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	50 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2024:10:27 10:29:07
Exposure Time	1/125 sec
F-Number	f/4.8
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	1400
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	50.00 mm
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	2000
Image Height	1331
Rendering	Custom
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	Low Gain Up
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

File: DSC_0668.jpg (1.05 MB, 2000x1331)

1.05 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON Z 6_2
Camera Software	NX Studio 1.7 W
Photographer	BEN C
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern	1103
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	50 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2024:10:27 10:29:08
Exposure Time	1/45 sec
F-Number	f/8.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	4000
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	50.00 mm
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	2000
Image Height	1331
Rendering	Custom
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	High Gain Up
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

>>4376232
Very cool

>>4376280
Look up liminal spaces

>corners of buildings
>backs of heads
>flowers
>cats
thanks for uploading your whole sd card of snapshits. this >>4378378 has some documentary value at least

>>4378460
If you applied that to your own post, you'd realize how useless it is. But you already knew that

>>4378283
Keep it padded at least so the constant jostling and vibration doesn't wear or loosen anything internally. Prolonged exposure to high heat can weaken adhesives and cook off the lubricants on some contact points inside the camera.

Don't keep your camera under the seat.

Yeah on mirrorless the sensor can delaminate and the weather sealing can dry up.

>>4378283
Yeah, this would be a great way to ruin your camera, anon. Both because of the heat issue, and also the repeated jostling which will inevitably cause you problems as well.

>>4378283
Just about anything will break a sony.

>>4377708
>nikon fucked up so bad they had to replace the cameras
And still you dont hear of their other problems like consistent, dslr and mirrorless, tendency to have tilted viewfinders until you leave the snoy hate, pentaxnikonpanalympus shilling circlejerk of /p/

Anons I'm going to do it and fall for the a7c meme

I can get one used for $800, any recommendations for lenses?

>>4377734
40mm f2.5 (it was made for that camera)

>>4377734
>>4377735
Get the viltrox version for 1/4th the price if you decide to go with a 40/2.5. No need to buy overpriced snoy.

>>4377708
So what you’re telling me is that Sony, Nikon, and Pentax have had failure rates so high that they triggered/supported class actions? And only with Canon can it truly be said any reports of failure are “just a few bad examples like in any production line”? In other words out of the four only Canon knows how to build cameras?

Awesome, glad I chose the right brand and didn’t get cucked. Explains why Sony is stuck at #2 despite going FF mirrorless years before Canon.

>>4377839
Also 7am when white people finally wake up

>>4377846
>Wake up first thing in the morning
>Fuck, I better post on 4 chan before it's too late
I get that we're all degenerate autists on this site, but I don't even think of 4chan until I'm taking a shit at work

>>4377847
i need the blue light or else i pass out and miss work

yesterday was bar hopping and tonight is a birthday party thats also bar hopping so mornings dont go well

File: 1707252971973252.gif (422 KB, 603x602)

422 KB GIF

>>4377864
My friend you need rest, relaxation, and hydration. Self care for yoself, or you're gonna burn out and kill yourself driving home from work one day or some shit.

>>4377649
Off-topic: do we know anything about the A7 V?

>>4375703
>I'm going to put my slides in this thread. these are practically found objects, the intention isn't in the principle phortor..graphry, it's in the digitization & processing, and even that is a blindfolded break. They are just the stack of slides that are in my way on my desk, minus any other editorial commentary. Comp nerds, take 5. Some of these I shot with crappy P&S's when I was 10, some are shot with shitwizard amazetard machinery and don't look any better. Some of the film is ektachrome, some is kodachrome, some is cheapshit generic flakes of ass-paste & developed with hot smegma for all i know. plus i'm pretty sure my grandma shot some and they got mixed in, idgaf anymore, as previously discussed, it doesn't matter anyway until you say it does, and I don't, yet.
we get it, you just discovered gravity's rainbow

Hi everyone,
i have bunch of 220 Provia 100F and i've been shooting them alot.
Great color and exposure even though expired.
My question is should i cross develop them with c-41 since it's cheaper then ?
Is it true that provia 100F works well for cross processing ?
I've been shooting and sending them to lab individually
but thought about getting c41 chems and doing it all myself
(e6 chemicals give me what....6 films ?!)

>>4377417
Don't do that!!

>>4378321
Explain ?!?

>>4375750
kino shot
>>4378446
negatives are not beatiful to the naked eye
drink bleach

>>4378356
I'm sorry to hear that

>>4378340
your unprotected prints should be good for 2 to 3 years until you really notice any fading. that's for those in direct sunlight. the others will last 10 years+

>>4378403
I found this thing:
>Hahnemühle Digital FineArt Protective Spray
Does it actually do something?

I needed some polycarbonate for a project last year, and found a local place that put me in touch with their supplier. I was able to get a 6x12 foot sheet. It was very expensive but still about 1/3 the price per sq ft as buying a cut piece.

>>4378411
yes, it makes you poorer
there's people who swear by those sprays and there's people who don't.
re-printing usually is not a hassle and you will want to change your wall decoration every few years anyway. so I wouldn't spend extra on a spray unless you have some high value print you are absolutely sure will be hanging for 10+ years or it's some signed work by a youtuber faggot