Noob here. Should I get a discounted new Leica SL3 camera for 3500$?
>>4398497It's a good camera. There are cheaper options but if that's the one you like there's nothing wrong with making an emotional purchase. If you like the camera and you think you're going to take lots of photos with it, why not?
>>4398497>60mp >IP54 weather sealing (standard)Nice camera to use for years to come
>>4398504>theres nothing wrong with emotionally spending money>just have fun bro>consume product. real joy comes from consuming the exact toy you want. Numale, wuss, sissy, dysgenic, small souled bugman, etc. >>4398497You will be paying the stupid tax for years and everyone will ask you>WHICH SONY/NIKON DID YOU USE TO SHOOT THISEvery time. And it will hurt you deeply.>>4398513IP ratings all allow immediately harmless ingress. Water in, electronics still working. Button presses are not part of the test. The standard is for disposable phones and non-repairable bluetooth earbuds that are replaced before long term corrosion causes damage. Hence nikon and canon have stricter internal standards and most serious electronics with IP ratings also exceed the standard they paid to certify for, because if they didnt they’d break.
>>43985151/10 bait I replied. Hope OP buys it and enjoys it.
>>4398516This and same.
>>4398504>omg just buy dont think when you feel things just buy, consoom, buy whatever you want dont think buy buy buy spend spend spendSoi faggot. Hope your "kids" (2 cats and some anime dolls) don't have to witness your inevitable suicide.>>4398497Enjoy spending 2-5x more on everything - batteries, lenses, and repairs. Just so you can use a repackaged sony a7rv and have everyone think you own a sony, both online and IRL.>Why did you put a leica sticker on your sony>Looks like sony colors>Nice sonyThe consoomers of entry level luxury are the cucks of society. You are simultaneously too wasteful and vain to be liked by the contributing class once they find out how much money you spent on the same cheap garbage dressed up with a brand name, and too poor and pathetically aspirational to be liked by the leeches AKA the 1%. And all you get for it, is being that much poorer.Because yes, you are spending $3000 on a stripped down sony with different branding.
>>4398521boo $everything is ripoff
>>4398515>>4398521Weak bait and even weaker samefag. No one is this retarded. Go easier next time.
>>4398497tf is depth map af among two more familiar af modes, is like half retail just grab one if you desire
>>4398497Its a worse a7rvSave your $1500 for lenses. Leica SL lenses are garbage btw. Same optical performance as tamron and viltrox, but its EUROPEAN soft lenses so theyre not bad they’re ARTISANAL.
>>4398635arguably you do not even need an a7rvs resolution unless you are photographing a ton of very fine clothing
>>4398635>>4398513>>4398521>>4398571OP here. I know the specs aren't amazing for the price, but I'm looking for something reliable. Will the camera be fine if it drops on hard ground?
>>4398635>Just get a snoy>>4398637>60mp? Who needs 45mp? Can't believe you want 33mp. Here take 24 mp. You should thank me for the 20.01 mp you get.
>>4398638No. It wont. >>4398639>Sony bad!Canon had to kill DSLRs lost basically all their contracts except getty, olympus and pentax died, and nikon had to kill DSLRs and still tanked, so clearly anyone saying this on the internet is just mat at sony for accidentally the camera market.
>>4398638Depends how you drop it. Most common issues is breaking the battery door, or shearing at the lens mount area (usually of the lens itself).
>>4398638>leica>reliableomegalul. worse sales numbers/broken cameras ratio of anyone, even worse than panasonic and fuji. https://www.reddit.com/r/Leica/comments/1dvzmn9/sl3_deletesoverwrites_images_leica_officially/remember when someone says MUH BROKEM SNOY and MUH CANNOT EOS FAIL, just one model from one of those companies outsells the entire mirrorless ILC market leica’s problems are far more widespread across the few cameras that exist and entire models are marked unusable past their expiration date due to things like failing sensors while even an old a6000 or canon rebel, a plastic pos, still works
>>4398642>snoy sales good>buy snoy!chill snoyshill no one is crossshopping Leica/snoy
>>4398645Yes, sony makes better products than leica. Canon makes better products than leica. Nikon makes better products than leica.Leica exists for trust fund parasites to buy the newest M, take a pic of it on their phone, use it twice, shelve it, then buy the newest M again next release. Their shit is absurdly low quality and unreliable.
https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/382975-m11-service-problems-a-sign-of-bigger-underlying-issues/>after green banding, rusting sensors, failing buttons, and glitchy firmware in every previous camera: This time, Leica’s reputation for engineering excellence is really at risk. >perhaps this camera (with 1/10th the featureset of a $1000 canon R8) is too complex a machine to be feasibleRemember, these people pay $4000 a prime for 60 year old lens designs that are identical in quality and consistency to ttartisan, cosina, and fujinon optics.
>>4398646lol only in fantasy land
>>4398648The $5000 35mm f2 for the SL has nearly identical optical characteristics, maybe hair better in the periphery, as the $500 Z mount 35mm f1.8 after stopping the latter down to f2 and basically looks like it could be a $1000 lens between the z 35/1.8 S and the sony 35/1.4 GM. Actually exactly the same look as the new canon 35/1.4 L. And this is meant to be a modern lens design. Sure, i’m sure thats european artisanship and not just shoddy work from leicas portugese sweatshop. The SL itself has a bad storage controller so it forgets where it is and overwrites cards if you dont shut it off just rightLeica sells junk for people who want to look rich to all 50 people who still see leica as a status symbol instead of a bigger embarrassment than calling a corvette a luxury car. Canon, sony, and Nikon sell cameras.
>>4398647Leica keeps the morons poor so they don’t pollute the Phase One community. They’re like Audi, draining wallets before scrubs remember Bentley exists.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC 2015.5 (Macintosh)Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width3000Image Height1839Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>4398644the comments in this are hilarious>leicucks
>>4398652Based.
>>4398649you just sound poor
>>4398661>consoomers when their slop is a scam: What, cant afford rare funko pops?I live in a 3.7 million dollar house on a 5 acre lot, without a mortgage, lol. I am simply above scams like leica.
>>4398666Ok snoyshill enjoy your broken shutters and green tint or whatever lol
>>4398497all digital bodies are basically the same besides fluff like fps, also besides snoy corpse colors on some older models, it's more important to look at the lenses available for your mount
>>4398671>outs himself as being unable to afford an a7ivYou probably think canons break because you can only afford the og r6 and nikons cant autofocus because you cant afford a z6iii
>>4398504>>4398497Yes, this, and you should buy a watch too. Just look for one that catches your eye. And get yourself some bling bling sneakers. Have you got the gold version of the latest iPhone(tm) yet?Never think, just buy.
>>4398694>you can't buy what YOU want you have to buy what I wantIf you tell me how to live my life I should be allowed to shoot you
>>4398504>there's nothing wrong with making an emotional purchaseThis. all decisions are emotional decisions desu. Just don't let that decision bankrupt you or whatever and you'll be good
>>4398694caring so much about what other people buy is just as cringe as the people you're making fun of
>>4398497Just wait until panny release the s1rii, it'll be the SL3 but with the word Lumix on the front, and better ergonomics
>>4398688>You probably think canons break because you can only afford the og r6 and nikons cant autofocus because you cant afford a z6iiiSad. Many such cases
>>4398734>>4398749A camera is a TOOL. Fuck off back to /fa/ggotland if you want to discuss what brand stickers to put on your "identity".
>>4398826a camera can be a tool, suredifferent people care about different things, im sorry that upsets you
>>4398839If you aren’t shooting with vintage Soviet cameras made from sheet metal and wood screws, you are like gay homosexuals. Get your shit together stupid westerner dogs.
>>4398839>>4398856I hate both of you, one is a consumerist shill and the other is an absolutist recluse.
>>4398734>>4398748>>4398749>when you kill your enemies they win. bullying is wrong. I hope jamal nicks your camera.
>>4398826>>4398864Does it make you mad when I spend my money on woteva I want cuz I like to? U gunna punch a hole in the wall of ur favela, pussy? Lmaoing at your life.
>>4398859and you care too much about other people
>>4398874>>4398875It's not just that you're wrecking your own finances and blowing money, chaining yourself to whatever meager economic station you have and barely saving enough if at all.You are encouraging other people to be as stupid as you.>>4398874Wow, you totally don't sound mad. You totally aren't mad because you're brushing up against the realization that you are economically insecure and none of the purchases you have made have been good life choices. And I'm sure, absolutely none of those purchases were made with what 4chan would think in mind, right? No "based" exif, no "dabbing on poors", no brandwars? Totally none right? ;)I mean, if you were that dumb, with real life consequences exceeding the cost of a hospital stay w/ insurance, and just realized it, you'd be fuming. And then claiming to be a millionaire from your apartment in an ethnic neighborhood. Like every other consoomer here.
>>4398891Yap yap yap poorfag
>>4398892>I'm totally not a stupid impulsive consoomer>im rich, and you're poor!>i can prove i'm rich by spending moneyNigga you proved you're burning savings, got a credit card, or work 30 hours at McDs and dont got bills because you live with your mom.
>>4398894>nigga>projectorus maximums
>>4398694>Instant btfo, as a joke>>4398734>SAY THAT TO MY FACE AND ID FUCKING KILL YOU!Consoomers, you are really coming off as insecure. Your bullies are 100% right, you're hood rich retards.>>4398497>Should I get a discounted new camera that is notoriously low quality and unreliable, from a brand where almost every single product is low quality and unreliable, for half the cost of a used 2008 subaru outback?No. Even if you spent the same amount of money on a newer camera like a sony a1 or a canon r5ii, you'd be getting a much better device that wouldn't randomly break or overwrite your memory card, and the lenses that did cost $4000 would be worth it instead of somewhere in the same quality ballpark as mid tier nikon glass.
>>4398891>You are encouraging other people to be as stupid as you.and why do you care so much tho
>>4398940>autistic subhuman questions why anyone would care that he is encouraging stupid behavioryou’ll understand if you’re born as a human in the next life bruv.
>>4398864This guy is bitter and a shitty no photo """photographer"""
