I’d buy it in a heartbeat. It can’t exist as you have it rendered though, there’s no mechanical linkage on the Z mount for rangefinder cam coupling.

>>4397752
did you make this in Photoshop?

>>4397752
That thing with an x-pro styled viewfinder would actually btfo everything else on the market now.
Especially if it had no video and a low resolution sensor with insane DR.

>>4397753
rangefinder-by-wire? No reason it can't be done. I don't see the rangefinder window though, looks like just a viewfinder

I'm honestly convinced that the autists asking for a new rangefinder camera have never shot a rangefinder camera and just want to LARP as Leicatards without shooting Poojifilm.

File: IMG_1049.jpg (242 KB, 2048x1040)

242 KB JPG

>>4397752
>z mount
>compact
the perils of using a medium format mount for full frame and aps-c

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	2048
Image Height	1040
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>4397811
Whos actually asking for a rangefinder? Theres a difference between a rangefinder style camera without the EVF hump and an actual rangefinder.

>>4397752
not a terrible idea, but couldn't let Nikon do it, otherwise it would end up looking and feeling like a plastic toy, just like the ZF and to an even greater extent, the ZFc.

>>4397753
>>4397757
onions

>>4397819
>>4397811
it's people who don't know or understand what frame lines are

File: nex7.jpg (597 KB, 3344x2296)

597 KB JPG

>>4397819
How is it that over a decade later only SNOY can figure this out?
Even foolji has given up, x-e hasn't been updated in 3 years

>>4397811
100% true

>>4397752

with modern af who cares about rangefinder maybe auto adjust uncorrected parallax optical finder for 28/35/40/50mm

>>4397839
japanese noses are very small

>>4397752
Yeah the ovf would be the most useless function in this camera, like most of the pro and x100 owners never use it.