Which camera manufacturer has the most aesthetically pleasing color science?
>>4390826Nikon because it starts out more nuetral than other brands color science.
>>4390838Nikon leave you with a stubborn green or blue cast that's hard to get rid of. No idea why, and a simple color temp adjustment or color balance change either doesn't completely eliminate it, or screws up colors in another way. It's worse in video because even 10-bit log isn't as flexible as 14-bit stills RAW.
>>4390826Canon and it is not even close.
>>4390826Fuji > Nikon > Canon > Olympus > Panasonic > Sony
>>4390845>Nikon over Canon... Nikon the brand known for green cast sewage >Fuji not dead last; Memeji that is not even on the same planet as Panasonic let alone real manufacturersOpinion goes straight in the trash. : )
>>4390826This image is faked. Sony cameras have an AWB customization dialog like most. It seems she purposefully added a green tint. I have this camera and it does the opposite in AWB. In shade with foliage it goes +3 magenta. >>4390840This is absolute bullshit unless your raw processor is half baked shit or you’re using a crappy lens with a color castThis also happens with poorfag gear on other brandsSony fe 50mm f1.8 has a greenish castSony 50mm f2.5 g is neutralMany cheaper olympus lenses like the 45mm f1.8 have a greenish cast in some scenesThe nicer pro series primes are neutralMany vintage lenses have a blue or cyan cast
In polls sony has the best colorIn real life sony has the majority of market share for FF cameras only and loses to canon on the basis of not having quality entry level gear at all (seriously, the r50 feels and works like a fucking spaceship compared to every sony under $1300)In real life sony nabbed a bunch of press contracts leaving canon with just getty right after the a7c/a7iv/a9ii/a1 were all outAnd according to some retards on /p/ and *rumors comment sections (same people) these cameras are bad? After all the same panasonic shills that said the s5ii was killing the a7ivs sales and the g9ii made the a9s pointless found the one a7cii with a heavy green cast on earth. It must be true.
I am so fucking tired of seeing this face. you're actually going to make me touch grass
>>4390854The only cameras i ever see are rangefinder style sony bodies, fuji x100s, and canon mini blobs like rebels or something (could be r100s tho)If i see anything else its an older dude
>>4390851she seems to be doing literally everything she can to make the sony side look worse and all the top comments on the video are all obvious ESLs. very suspicious.you dont see green skin bitching anywhere else unless its the a7iii’s AWB or a lightroom user. very strange.
>>4390851>>4390854>>4390857holy cope
>>4390862Yes, thats the one. The only person with this issue. Show the pajeets in the top comments.
>>4390865Meds
>>43908261. Nikon2. Sony3. CanonThis is for modern mirrorless cameras. If we count DSLRs, then Canon had really good colors. Not so anymore though, unfortunately.Don't know about the rest cause I haven't used any other brands.
>>4390881Aw problem? Does it look a little too artificial with the jeet shills?>>4390925Nikon colors look too much like iphone colors. Dead last.
>>4390926
>>4390931Which pajeet did this crappy test with underexposed photos? You’re cropping out the sources logo for a clear reason.Actually I think all the unsourced screengrab shitposting on /p/ is you. You alone. Some thirdie loser no doubt.
>>4390940some white dude from vistek
>>4390948>canadian camera storeSo, pajeets had their hands in it regardless>saars, iphone photo is brighter saars, nikon is dull and gray skin saars, by the apple product always my dudes, do the needful, smartphone is future, app is future, cloud is future. self storage and computer and dedicated camera is like farming now sirs. apple is like having grocery store. praise vishnu for this gifts!
>>4390952he preferred the nikon colors in the video lol
>>4390931>Human>Human>What the actual alien fuck
>>4390953Even worse, poutine for brains
>>4390826Kodak, duh.
>>4390974Quite so
>>4390826I prefer Nikon's colors because they are the most neutral and I do very little correction to them, but Sony has better DR.
>>4390971if you prefer skin tones that lean towards jaundice, sony wins I guess
>>4390983Made up issue
>>4390982Sony colors (the real ones without any shilling) are more filmlike, nikon colors remind me of primetime tv. If yellowstone is shot on all nikon gear i wouldnt be surprised. Same boring colors and rendering.
>>4390931Nikon looks the most natural. Sony and iphone look like fake and unnatural.
>>4391001Natural colors are saturation -25? You might need an eyesight check, or you’re viewing on a fucked up display with fake contrastSony colors look far better
>>4391006Nikon and canon colors make alcoholics and pseudo-whites look paler and less unhealthy than they are in real life so theres some preference for them among latte skins and boomersYes sony is used by most fashion photographers that arent using MF at that moment, but they also shoot models that have good skin to begin with
>>4390840Bullshit you pathetic excuse for a photographer. Not knowing how to develop your raws is embarrasing. Do you even shoot raw?
>>4390826I do not know, I am not a nerd. But I like Nikon cameras most so I will say Nikon :)
>>4390826Canon and then Nikon. Everything else is a meme.
>>4390826Framing is not the same, their argument is invalid
>>4391463>Color comparison>compares composition????
>>4390826>>4390843It's Canon, and you all know it's Canon. People buy Canon for the colours. They had right from the start, and the colours on all their cameras are the same, mirrorless too. Nikon does not and cannot do this, even the colours between the d8xx generations are wildly different with the d850 being the best but still no way near real life.>>4390838>>4390845>>4390925No way you actually believe this. I'm a Nikon shooter and even I would not be so deluded. The green cast is there on most Nikons, especially mirrorless ones.
>>4391667What raw processor are you using jfc? Darktable? Shiteroom with adobes own profiles?I have had 5 nikon cameras and there was no green cast on any of them. They were overly neutral and Zs are a bit cold. The only cameras that have ever been able to turn super shit LED-in-frosted-glass bar fixture light actual white. I have had 3 sony cameras and no green cast either. All this green cast shit is starting to seem like everyone is using some awful presets or unironically shooting jpeg. Also canon colors are gross, flat, and look like a video log gamma. Horrid reds. Fucked skies. Inaccurate skin tones that make the sickly look ok and the healthy and beautiful look sickly. Everything is too low contrast. I’d take a 2020+ sony over any canon for color except for a few of the clunky blobs. The EOS R series are not it, and I’m pretty sure 99% of their color was the lens coatings on EF because RF lenses worsen the gross sterility. Just like if you stick to A mount lenses on older snoys known for fucky color, the colors are suddenly very good.
>>4391667>nikon gree-this post seems a bit like an adevery single google result for this points to AWB and jpeg tards or lightroom issues with aps-c blobSLRs, and a retard saving in adobe rgbsince raw is now the standard (not one single camera renders raws to usable images as well as c1/phocus and we’re way past the point where raws were too slow to process and too space hungry for most computers) and white balance is essentially arbitrary this isnt an issue[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution144 dpiVertical Resolution144 dpiColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width750Image Height701
>>4391667you are plain wrong and a liar to boot
>>4390974based, film is the height of photography
>>4391694>not one single camera renders raws to usable images as well as c1/phocusI'm at the point where I'm ready to expand into something more robust than NXstudio for editing my photos, should I get LR or C1? from what I've gathered:>NX gives you the best colors>LR is easier for a beginner >C1 + photoshop is industry standard for pros
>>4391710Photolab
>>4391710Capture one without a doubt. All lightroom has is aislop
>>4391710Capture one is way faster for masking, color adjustments, and retouchingLightroom has the plasticizer/ai denoiser and peter mckinnon presets, and a lot of lag
Assuming you had the right setting any FF released in the las 14years has enough data in the raw to make this question irrelevant. Its a skill issue related to color theory and software knowledge. And don't even bother to answer me, because if you disagree you just failed the skill check
