[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/p/ - Photography

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: Viltrox 135mm 1.8.jpg (169 KB, 952x1149)
169 KB
169 KB JPG
>he fell for the overpriced 'Snoy G-Master' meme
Sad. Many such cases.
>>
>>4397299
Such a large lens
>>
Branding is just that, branding

Some G lenses like the 20mm f1.8 are as good as a G master optically.
Some GMs are underwhelming, like the first gen 85mm.
Also see canon L lenses. A few modern RF Ls are really terrible and get mogged by sony/nikon. Some nikon S lines like the 35mm are quite shit. Samyang made a third party RF UWA prime that would have received an L designation if it were a canon product and promptly got sued, lol.

The branding doesn't tell you anything but that they didn't cut corners and included weather sealing, extra controls, and fluorine coatings and shit. It is 100% possible to beat a company's highest branded product. Just look at all of leica. The vast majority of their lenses are terrible, but cost $4000.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.