Which hydrogen bomb test had the highest fusion-to-fission energy ratio, making it the "cleanest" in terms of energy production?
>>16546218Ivy Mike
Tsar Bomba
>>16546220Nope. It was very dirty. The cleanest was Tsar Bomba with 97% of its yield coming from fusion.
>>16546218>cleanestfusion produces a lot of neutron flux, which neutron activates most materials causing them to become radioactivefusion energy plants will have to periodically replace all of the highly radioactive parts that have degraded due to neutron dislocationit ain't as clean as popularly believed
>>16546264>97% > 99.01%Kek.
>>16546220>>1654631777% of the yield of Ivy Mike was just from the fast fission of the tamper.
>>16546358Kek.
>>16546317>>16546371
>>16546218That would be Ripple II from the Housatonic test during Operation Dominic. It yielded about 10 megatons with only a 10 kt fission primary or about 99.9% pure fusion. It was an unconventional design compared to the standard Teller-Ulam configuration. Apparently, it was so efficient that it didn't require a fission sparkplug.https://files.catbox.moe/xevz85.pdf
>>16546218I thought "fusion" bombs are really just fission bombs where the fusion only adds additional neutrons to accelrate and make the fission a much higher percentage of the energy than without the fusion neurton boost.
Pure fusion nukes are a reality and the most closely guarded nuclear secret
>>16547313it's the other way around. the fission stage in a fusion bomb is only to produce the required temperature and pressure to set off the fusion stage.
>>16546491Interestingly, the Kinglet/Ripple II device was already tested earlier and fizzled.
>>16547313>>16547475>"fusion" bombs are really just fission bombs where the fusion only adds additional neutrons>fission stage in a fusion bomb is only to produce the required temperature and pressure to set off the fusion stageBoth exist; former are called boosted fission bombs, while latter are (multistage) thermonuclear bombs
heh hehplplplpl
>>16546491>a 10 kt fission primary or about 99.9% pure fusion.No uranium tamper?
Aren't fusion bombs very expensive to maintain due to the tritium half life? Also doesn't the radioactive hydrogen need to be kept in a compressed liquid state the whole time?
>>16547464You mean isomer warheads? Wait until you find out about the Dugway Zapper, our positronium particle beam via a polariton driven gamma ray laser
>>16552430There are solid hydrides and much better neutron flux moderation
>>16552068No, it didn't use any fissile tamper, and it was certainly not an ordinary one. Yet, it was theorized to break the 6 kt/kg Taylor limit, with a predicted yield ratio of 12–18 kt/kg.
Ivy Mike, feel free to ignore the russian bots
>>16552430The tritium in a fusion bomb is bred from (stable) lithium-6 during the explosion
>>16553271Intredasting, haven't seen details of this before
>>16553271>such as lead or uraniumso lead?
>>16554264Who knows? But most sources suggest it didn't have any fissionable tamper like depleted uranium or thorium. It could have been any high-Z material, like lead or even gold, as used in the W71 warhead.
>>16552760Isomer controversy was an actual oh shit moment in terms of it being something that should not exist as far as the public is aware. It's also misdirection; the technical prowess required to properly implement that concept in a weapon is a distraction being more needlessly complex than pure fusion. With pure fusion, the path to gamma ray lasers also becomes simplified and convoluted solutions are not required. Don't get distracted fren.
>>16546491I hate people who talk like this pseud in pic. you aren't even dumbing it down for laymen. you are uneducated and trying to sound like you know what you are talking about after reading the wikipedia article or asking ChatGPT
>>16554264Not necessarily, as the modulator layer are said to be exaggerated in the drawing, and implied to be very thin. It is possible that benefits of using depleted uranium over the much lighter lead may outweigh any negative aspects. It could even make the bomb cleaner due to more efficient fusion stage
Bros, I really wanna build a thermonuclear bomb now, just for the hell of it. Who's in?
>>16555462Those are not very useful.Total mind control is far more practical.
