Why are the vaccinated like this?
>>17020187>Everyone that didn't have a mask, when not I'll at all in a 3month span of time surrounding the now of any moment was actually a silent carrier infecting all of the rest of us, who were all vaxxed up and masked
The unmasked outsider; a fearless truth teller. That's the guy!
>>17020134Vaxxer here. I got annoyed when bitches told me I had to keep wearing masks, yes. Eventually they quit though.I was in an aeroport lobby when the announcement came out that we didn't have to wear them anymore which was nice. They should have said that earlier.
vax was there to mutated the virus, not to help individuals.
This is the alternate forms of knowing now being taught by science. You end up with having to acknowledge that nonwhite people having psychic powers.Not a single scientific body has stood against this. The self declared (and not disputed) pro-science and “reality based” government of Canada is pushing this hard.Science is now literally magic.Video: https://x.com/franceswiddows1/status/2078534757638697275
Bonus points: it’s literally a hate crime to deny this in Canada. The science is just so clear on the matter we don’t need to allow non-believers to exist outside of prison. Thanks, science.
>>17019919The most vocal "trust the science" liberal you know will solemnly nod her head in agreement with thisIt’s so.. beautiful. Science is MAGIC. Its uses ancestral sacred indigenous fairy dust to validate whatever I want to believe at any given time
Indigenous ways of knowing are just as valid if not more so than western ones. Guess which one killed millions
>>17019919Do they perceive infinite grudges up to the Paleolithic or do the psychic powers only click when they're emotionally manipulating a target population?I'm serious, is the extent of their parapsychological reach bound by time?Do the grudge waves fade away like radiation with the half-life of isotopes?
>>17019919>have psychic powers>use it to decide where to place casinos and pick out the weakest minds susceptible to gambling addictions
Factor Analysis sucks donkey balls.
>>17017027So you want a mathematical model that finds causes in psychology without any intertwined theoretical frameworks? You know how difficult that is? Lmfao factor analysis and regression work…
>>17017363Shut up fajit
i hate aischizos so much it's unreal
>>17017733I want a model that prefers to find no causes over finding made up causes, maybe that's crazy but some say that's what separates science from say astrology>>17017738fuck of faget
>>17017027Science is made up garbage
https://www.math.wustl.edu/~victor/classes/pmf/delaPorte-Herbst-Hereman-vanderWalt-PRASA-2008.pdf
>>17017748Science in a nutshell: Mental gymnastics, disconnected from reality abstract and useless garbage
https://arxiv.org/pdf/cs/0001027WTF
>>17018328>WTFWhich words did you not understand?This is literally how we do it now.
>>17018328Shitentists make up stuff to sound intelligent, they are pretty much a bunch of nogg/jeet teens scamming money from white men for "a great purpose"
>>17018329https://csc.ucdavis.edu/~chaos/share/InfoEnginesProgram_2025_final.pdf
>>17018328Yes goyim, you know all that garbage, you are very smart!
https://ronentalmon.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/Access_Kemeth_2018.pdf
>>17017758Read a bootleg, nab angel too, bad earGod, as a devil, deified, lived as a dogReliever deliver a reviled reveilerPhoton not “oh” pDevil never even livedAdded rater as a retarded D.A.Senile MIT Devil severs bootstrap parts to obsreves lived timelinesRed root six, a live evil axis to orderSome A notes set on a E//M OSDerived among a gno made viredNo drapes, u bare, re-er-er, abuse pardonTrap a god, redraw a Spiral set on DNA and no tesla rips a warder dog apartMe? E/M?Not A Devil, I lived a tonRuffle elf furSerut pure sands DNA’s e-ruptures I made Trams t’ u! O, outsmarted am I!Departed, am I made trap-edTrap-ed won, I now departComment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>17017758Midwits make up words to sound intelligent
So help me understand this >Math is foundations of sciences and stem >But foundations of math is bunch of statements we don't prove to be true and basically said yeah they're true >Then we prove stuff by using these statements that haven't been proven themselves This makes no sense
Do you guys need a little time to come to terms with the grieving process? Maybe a little time to fabricate a better Hydra game?
>>17020129
>>17020129Predictive power literally does have something to do with things being true, it's "hey the thing my theory predicted turned out to be true"
>>17020131"What predictions does it make?"Picrel^^
>>17016732>>Then we prove stuff by using these statements that haven't been proven themselvesYes, they are only true if you assume the axioms are true, you can assume all of them are false, no one is preventing you to.
>what is this?https://implyingrigged.info/wiki/2026_4chan_Summer_CupA virtual soccer (football) tournament involving the boards of 4chan, /sci/'s team promoted to this winter's cup after making it out of the group stage in Autumn.>Where can I watch?https://isthisliv.com/4cc/stream.htmlhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aRxJkRZho68>we have a team?Yes, https://implyingrigged.info/wiki//sci/>where can I watch previous games?https://implying.fun/https://implyingrigged.info/wiki//sci/#Recent_&_Upcoming_Matches
We're top of the group and now we're 9 point cursedsee you next saturday
damn, /v/ got shut the fuck out
>>17019493On one hand it's bizarre that they didn't score even once with how far forward their midfielders were, on the other they might have been running some addition meme tactics that undercut their effectiveness.
The Ro16 draw has concluded >>>/vg/574603579 we play /n/ to open up the Round of 16
>>17019483she was able to solve this
Any arguments against solar energy?
>>17013548
>>17014867In my jurisdiction it's just the power lobby. No matter what, you need the grid operator to move the power from you to the consumer. Solar power at utility scales is a losing proposition because of overproduction (too much energy because of too many solar panels). Private scales are always a good idea because you never get penalized for overproduction and you can cut your power bill in half or more. The big issue is that the way the market is structured, solar gets paid at solar prices regardless of battery storage, so no one builds battery storage even if it's cost effective (VRFBs are, for the record). This is very specific to my local context, which is historically (and persistently) retarded.For your home, it is never a bad idea to get solar and LFP battery storage, unless you live in alaska or something.
>>17017768>fucking nanosecond control action time scale stabilityyou're full of shit
>>17015962You're a feral animal that's dangerous for humans and carries diseases
>>17013548It's not very efficient, but I see no real problem with it resting atop your shingles and subsidizing your electricity bill.Make a Tesla Truck covered in photovoltaic cells and polycarbonate layering and you have yourself some residual charging while driving to prolongued your drivable range a little.
I'm too stupid to understand the debate around consciousness, but as far as I understand, physicalists are losing and we may have souls. Is this correct?
>>17020141That's fine. You need consciousness to understand.
>>17019900OP here. I still don't get it, but physicalism sounds more possible now.
>>17019900There is no feedback on ourselves, so we are a stable entity outside of it cause.
>>17019900>we may have souls.The way I think of it is materialism is just one possibility out of infinite. Something being out there is infinite possibilities. So why would I gamble on one out of infinity?
>>17019900>physicalists are losingkinda>we may have soulsJust as a dragon may live in Carl Sagan's garage
making some real contributions to the world
>>17014274that won't work bro, you can't embed computers into domains
>>17014360>not banking his time and letting it compound interest NGMI.
>>17015719stfu you dumb bitch
rofl>>17014433
>>17014274Math is as useful as ever
Everything is vibration, including matter, thoughts, emotions, and consciousness.
you can imagine the secant as rotating around the objective complex unit circle, at any point, the limit of that point; the tangent, is only falsifiable in that tangent's rotating secant bounds
QED
>>17019554Kinda lewd how they're touching tips like that.
>>17019474The particle field is a projection in front of the central mass.
>>17019484So nothing physical existed before conscious life forms emerged?Fucking hack
Now what? I never really had any faith in dark matter/energy. They could never define what it was or how it was causing the expansion of the universe or anything else about it really...https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cqLypHXK-bs
>>17017423Lol no it isn't. And he has the order reversed. Dark matter came first. A Catholic priest invented the big bang theory based on the story of creation in the bible to explain cosmological red shift and then everyone pretended like it was so fucking genius. Problem is it's not true and it doesn't match the findings of the universe. So when you try to cram the universe into a big bang theory you have to explain why the universe isn't working the way that you observe it to be. The first iteration of this caused dark matter to be theorized. But of course if you have enough dark matter to make the universe make sense compared to the observations of it now it no longer works again so now you have to add dark energy, by the end you get an equation that makes no fucking sense and a worldview where 96% of the universe is bullshit. The solution to this, of course, is that the big bang theory is bullshit. But it's sacred in cosmology so nobody's allowed to question it.
>>17017428nigger I am not talking about the big bang "theory", which is hardly a theory at all
>>17016490Science is fake and gay plebbit mental gymnastics
>>17016492bumping glorious original thread
>>17020238It's not an original thread. You retards post this slop every day.
How to distinguish between real papers and bullshit papers? I never know if what I'm reading is believable or written by a crackpot>inb4 learn first and then if the paper matches with what you learn then it's veridicbut I need to learn from somewhere no? if I knew everything, I wouldn't need to read papers
>>17016278I had a physics professor who said that before going to a surgery, she'd read several papers about the procedure to learn about her oddsbut how can she do that if she knows physics but doesn't know medicine?
>>17016224You read multiple papers until you have enough understanding on the subject to discern what is plausible and what isn't, if you still can't tell research that topic specifically or attempt to replicate some of their findings.If you can't do that then don't worry it's totally irrelevant if you "believe" in any paper your opinion won't matter anyways.
>>17016224There is no difference, science is science fiction nowadays.
>>17016224>How to distinguish between real papers and bullshit papersThe thinly veiled secret is that almost everything is bullshit based on fake data, no one ever goes back to replicate a study or they will always use info that support their bias, and the moment somebody finds something wrong it's decades too late.The more somebody references others the more likely it is that the data is polluted, so you can only trust studies made first hand or heavily tested, and bad news, you and your peers (sometimes) are the only ones that you can trust with that. If you were to make a meta analysis made of thousands of studies with thousands of data how much would you replicate and verify? you wouldn't test or verify said data, it doesn't help you get closer to the truth, a bigger collection of garbage in doesn't stop it from getting garbage out, but it is helpful for lying with statistics as it helps you be able to cherrypick.take >>17016290, in that case it is easy to tell it is bad paper because you can see the AI, but what can you do when you have to corroborate something based on it? nobody has done it before and nobody will, what if somebody else makes their research using >>17016290 among others ? will you also verify all the papers that made that one new paper? how much influence did it have on that new paper? Nobody can tell.So what is the best you can do? If it is for the truth, test everything with as much skill as you are able, otherwise it is a problem for somebody else some decades ahead to solve, and only when it becomes a problem for them.Contrary to what some could believe, there is always a bigger bias to publish something that can't be tested than something that is truthful
>>17016224Impossible
>if theres no natural experiment then theres no science theorythis knowlege saved me from becoming a bootlicking globohomo liberal
>>17016865Wait a minute. Does that whale have legs?
>>17016866This whale had legs
>>17003252they were driven away from /his/ because they get bullied by atheists there
>>17002979Not a creationist but this isn't actually proof against creationism, your just stating that similar creatures have similar DNA which a creationist would have no problem with. What a creationist would have a problem with is dissimilar creatures having similar dna because of common ancestry, like whales being mammals and having small useless feet hidden inside them.
>>17016032How about going to plebbit?
