>le particle has le energy when not in le motion>whoa
>>16933188yea
Whoa
>>16933188>completely meaningless axiom because everything is in motion at all times and the abscence of motion doesn't exist
Fucking genius
Brilliant to be sure
In the words of physicist Anton Zeilinger:> [W]e always implicitly assume the freedom of the experimentalist... This fundamental assumption is essential to doing science. If this were not true, then, I suggest, it would make no sense at all to ask nature questions in an experiment, since then nature could determine what our questions are, and that could guide our questions such that we arrive at a false picture of nature.How is this not a form of cope? “Waaah, the observer effect isn’t le special, waaah”. Oh grow up. Observation doesn’t predate the thing - the physics leading up to it - making it even possible to begin with. How the fuck did people suddenly forget this?WHY do people think that free will is Lolsorandom?
>>16958190i can't determine that.
>>16976186>Thinking you're a legitimate scientist in a deterministic universe is like thinking you're a legitimate detective in an interrogation room where the suspect puts all the questions in your mouth.I guess that works out if the universe is God's intelligible clockwork design, which God intended for you to figure out. Just more proof that determinism is a Christian doctrine.
>>16958190>and that could guide our questions such that we arrive at a false picture of natureWhy would it do that? I would rather assume that if there was no free will and everything was determined then every question and every answer would be equally correct, since predetermined interactions would lead to predetermined outputs, so there would be no "incorrect" answers, rather you would get exactly what you asked for.
>>16977800>my IQ is 75 by the way
Duh
The human brain has discovered something that is true that lies beyond physical reality
>>16975510>discoveredProof?
>>16975649The IQ on the net is basically through the floor at this point. No one knows anything.
>>16975523>live in the perfect world of integer geometryWhat length is the "side length 1" to which reality bases its Pi on?
>>16977533How many years have you been namenigging?
>>16975510Bumping this useless thread to the first page lol
Where does the energy that accelerates a space probe doing a sling shot manoeuvre with e.g. a planet come from? Shouldn't the gravitational drag zero out the pull, i.e. no change in speed?Also, what's /sci/'s opinion on strangelets? does they exist? Supposedly, scientists kvetched over the potential hazard of their their existence, and tried to shut the LHC down. Also, there's been observations that support it, like GRB 240529A, potentially a strange star.
I'm trying to prove that it's equivalent that a topological space [math] \left(X,\tau\right) [/math] is (i) completely regular, (ii) compatible with a family of pseudometrics and (iii) uniformizable.That (i) implies (ii) should be done by considering, for all [math] x\in X[/math], all open neighborhoods [math]V[/math] of it and all continuous functions [math] f [/math] separating its exterior from [math]x[/math], construct the pseudometric [math] d\left(y,z\right) = \left| f\left(y\right) - f\left(z\right) \right| [/math] and prove this family of pseudometrics generates [math]\tau[/math].That (ii) implies (iii) should be done by noticing that each pseudometric generates a uniform structure, taking their least upper bound and proving it generates [math]\tau[/math].That (iii) implies (i) should be done by considering a compact [math]K[/math] and a disjoint closed set [math]F[/math], using the uniform regular separation result to get an entourage [math]V[/math] such that [math] V\left[K\right] \cap V\left[F\right] = \emptyset [/math] and then constructing a function with a Birkhoff-Kakutani-like trick. The function turns out to be uniformly continuous.Is my intuition right? Is there any additional trick to show the function in the last part is uniformly continuous?>>16974371That, and you also have connective tissue and muscles/tendons that give it a bit more structure.
Photonics for GPUs, photonics for quantum computing, photonics for GPUs for quantum. What is the emerging case for the enourmous amounts of money pouring into these 'photonics' companies? Is this tech viable, or just wasted on speculation? I can understand the money into fiber optic cables (faster and faster transmission through thinner and thinner toobs), but in the chips in stead of metal wires still generates heat to cause issues? Is room temperature photonics for quantum the better developing technolgoy?
>>16974355>any advice?Go to doctor? Hmmmm....nah
>>16974212Does this mean that the year of the planet becomes a tiny bit shorter because the spacecraft stole some of its orbital velocity? How short of a difference would we be talking about?
>>16979620I was trying to work out if we could miss the end of the Earth with the final asteroid impact in a million years if we didn't pollute or have satellites steel our velocity. It doesn't seem to make barely any difference with the sun being many times stronger than Earth.
Thanks cognitive overloading+offloading
>>16977394Nigerians with an IQ of 90 make 200k on average in america. Clearly the test isn't working and not predicting intelligence because they manage to make 200k.
>>16977394Just accept the fact you cant even grasp basic stats you literal high school drop out. Like wbat do you get out of acting like this?
>>16978697>Nigerians with an IQ of 90 make 200k on average in america.I'm sure they do, but would you care to cite a source? "Regression to the mean for Nigerians is rather extreme. The ones born in the U.S. clock in well below Whites, in both education and incomes. This makes sense, however, as it seems their parents were exceptionally educated, so we should expect this sort of regression. It also makes plenty of sense that this regression is greater than the regression for Indians, since it involves regressing to different means.Nigerians earn more than African Blacks and foreign Blacks in general, but they’re also not the highest-performing African group. That would be South Africans. But that’s misleading, because the South African group is peopled by Whites who command higher incomes than any of the Black African groups, while the Black South Africans perform worse than Nigerians. Nevertheless, Nigerians are not the highest-performing Black African group. Zimbabwean Blacks out-earned them ($48,793), and Cameroonians were plausibly tied with them at $45,352. The rest performed worse than them, which we might predict because Nigeria is the largest Sub-Saharan African nation by far. Due to their size, this suggests Nigerians are pretty much at the top of the pile for America’s Sub-Saharan African Black immigrants."https://www.cremieux.xyz/p/the-myth-of-nigerian-excellence
>>16978697>Nigerians with an IQ of 90 make 200k on average in americaDoubt.jpg
Say goodbye to meat, chud. Science has determined a way to cure you of immorality, with or without your permission.
People are so slow and retarded; they are bunched up right next to me, and I can feel them in my apartment. FUCK YOU!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>>16978297cows arent sentient though
>>16978413ive seen enough people irl who unironically think like this
>>16978413The real increasingly outpaces the absurd. Prepare accordingly.
>>16978413He's a notorious contrarian in Bioethics. He defends a lot of universally indefensible shit and even acknowledges that in some of his papers.Check his publications section:https://wmed.edu/node/1371
This can't be true, right?
>>16977941Yeah, such as that, but not limited to it.
S=1-1+1-1+1-1...S=1-(1-1+1-1...)S=1-S2S=1S=1/2
>>16977819Some infinite sums converge to a real number. Other infinite sums just blow up to infinity. And other infinite sums keep looping forever. Those videos assume that all infinite series must converge to a real number even when it isn't the case that's why the youtubers reach those absurd results.
Ramanutsac ain't shit or I'm a genius, my family was also basically really neglectful so I was idk just trying to learn shit, I was already getting to be an encyclopedia by like age 5. I wasn't actually learning math at an accelerated pace so I didn't have the algebraic shit to work with, also just never thought about adding two series together, this was actually just one day when I was around five, but I distinctly remember just thinking about this. Like if you added one and subtracted one forever would you get something else? I remember also thinking about Zeno's paradox. So idk I kinda think it's possible more kids than me were capable like our schools are beyond stupid to start but, I think a good 10% or so of people could be doing at least calculus around five or ten if we just pushed them
>>16977819*sigh*https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=beakj767uG4
Space aliens destroy humanity in 2060. Mankind's only hope, a time machine built by a mad scientist. The plan: to send people back in time to any point in history one time. They can take with them whatever they can carry and once the jump is made the aliens destroy the time machine. The goal, jumpstart the industrial revolution early in order to have the time to defend Earth from the invasion.What four people do you choose? Where do you send them? What do you want them to bring?
Doesn't matter, because you aren't saving your own timeline. You'll just send a guy back in time and then get destroyed by space aliens, while the guy you sent back saves an entirely separate timeline from space aliens.
>>16979109Time travel is retarded
>>169791091 man; 3 women. Selection criteria: >pass genetic screening for recessive disorders. >Highly fertile.>Low neuroticism. >110+ IQ>at least one fluent in English language>Male needs to be physically competent in survival scenarioTime/place:>Early Carboniferous period. >Probably somewhere near modern day Mississippi but would need to check with geologist/paleontologists. What to bring:>Sack of potatoes>Millet seeds>Gravity generator>Tablet or similar, needs to contain modern Wikipedia in offline format (I vaguely remember an application like this already exists), media optional but recommended. >necessary peripherals (external hard drive for educational media, chargers, cables, etc.)Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>16979626Btw, by "gravity generator" I'm talking about those things that generate electricity by humans lifting weights that are slowly lowered by the device. Just to charge the tablet or whatever.
/sqt/ - simple questions thread (aka /qtddtot/)Previous thread: >>16893204>what is /sqt/ for?Basic questions regarding maths and science. Also homework.>where do I go for advice?>>>/sci/scg or >>>/adv/>where do I go for other questions and requests?>>>/wsr/ >>>/g/sqt >>>/diy/sqt etc.>how do I post math symbols (Latex)?rentry.org/sci-latex-v1>a plain google search didn't return anything, is there anything else I should try before asking the question here?scholar.google.com>where can I search for proofs?proofwiki.org>where can I look up if the question has already been asked here?warosu.org/scieientei.xyz/sci>how do I optimize an image losslessly?Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>16978931It's literally what the equation tells youH: U + PV = Object energy + energy it takes to make space for the object = energy you can get from object + work you can get from the environment refilling the voidG = U + PV - TS = Object energy + energy it takes to make space for the object - energy you can never use for workA = U - TS = ...
>>16979082Okay, but in terms of a real-world example.I can imagine the energy stored in a hamster.I can imagine the energy it takes to shove the air out of a way to bring a hamster into existence.I can imagine the energy it takes to bring a hamster into existence if the space it will occupy is really pushing for a hamster.What's Helmholtz relative to the hamster?
Are these wedding colors?
>>16979103interactive color cube:https://cs.wellesley.edu/~cs307/threejs/demos-s21-r95/Color/colorcube.html
>>16979103I think those are like troon colors or something lgbt related
>it's not that 0 kelvin was just a "coldest point we know lol" thing>but rather than by checking how any gas changes in volume with temp, no matter the gas, they all end up extrapolated down thereThat's Fucking WackWhy didn't anyone tell me science could be interesting and fun?
>>16979608>it's not that 0 kelvin was just a "coldest point we know lol" thingYou need to read less blogs if you thought this seriously at any point. This isn't even how the concept of absolute zero is thought in primary school lmao
Science is a few things:1. Knowledge (this is where the word comes from) to be acquired and information that can be applied (technology, chemistry, cooking, etc, are all applied sciences)2. The method of “fuck around and find out” (causality/repeatability as it is - with the additional nuances of the reproducibility crisis - each stroke of a paint brush won’t be exactly the same - things like the big bang already happened - etc) which is the bare minimum of science - “remember kids, the only real difference between proper science and fucking around is writing is down”3. The scientific community and overall consensus, peer review, scientific dogma (consider that half of the scientific community can’t even tell you what a woman is - it is perhaps a borderline cult at present), etc, that ostracizes dissent and divergent thinking 4. Physics, nature, reality, as it is - Einstein himself did not see science as merely something to apply in the one sided sense; he saw it as a background symphony, playing its cosmic tune independently of our ability to listen in; it lies in wait for all time; “the music of the spheres”; he directly compared it to Mozart “locating” already existent beauty, or harmony, while people like Beethoven merely constructed their music Any questions?
>>16935316What IS a woman? Certainly not something that will sleep with me! *sobs*
>>16974564lol
>>16935316Real neato
>>16935316techmology, what is that all about?
>>16935316Science, not S0iance.
>>16975451This is not the way
>>16975531>t. doesn't use beta
>>16975606No its just measured constantly when measuring the two way speed. Because of lenght and time dialation. In reality it depends on the relativ movement throught the aether.
>>16975358What?
>>16975354Dood
More than 80% of the people were mentally deluded in 1990. Imagine now.https://youtu.be/rpVcJsa0Cxw?t=118
>>16979459>But if this thread is to have any purposeIt was never going to. The thread is a meaningless one-liner and a youtube link.
>>16979460True but I wanted to see what particular variety of pseud OP is.
>>16979408>Sri Sathya Sai Speaks
>>16979478>Autism speaks
>>16979478>open video>hear indian accent>close video
>Tesla>Fractals>Golden ratioIn any online discussion, if any of these three things are evoked, it's an absolute guarantee you're talking to a moron or overconfident teenager.
>>16979108
>>16979469We know.
>>16979108You'll be real quiet when someone invents a fractal golden ratio tesla coil that reaches local over unity via parasitic Schumann resonance and induced complex feedback, bet
>>16979108for fractals it dependsMandelbrot or a snowflake? yeah it's pseudoa generic space-filling curve or the Cantor set? might actually be someone worthwhile
>>16979556Yeah. And Tesla's a valid topic if you're discussing the history of what he actually did or are using him as a vector to discuss legitimate EE concepts. Golden ratio/Fibonacci sequence? Maybe you're talking to an immortal rabbit farmer or a fan of Sanskrit poetry?
AI will only replace proof monkeys in mathematics. People who are bad at writing proofs and spend most of their time coming up with IDEAS will dominate the mathematical landscape when AI gets advanced enough.
Is this how mathlets cope?
>>16979421What?
