I heard adrenaline and oxytocin are needed, so I should take her to a horror movie and what else?is feeding her sugary things a good idea? that releases dopamine, which causes habit forming, right? so maybe I should give her candy each time we hang out? what else?
>>17081689>open source programmingI'm not so sure about that
>>17080915Clandestine nicotine patches every night she stays over.
>>17082431Believe it or not they're very supportive of that and they do enjoy just having one additional thing That you do that is praised by society or it used to be Look that bad it shows that you have energy and that's really what they want they want to see that you have energy to do something
>>17081689>>don't be arrogant, materialistic, or vain Someone hasn't bothered reading the material foid's shlick to
>>17082613you don't want a material fold hoarderyou want a frugal woman
So 0.9999.... == 1 is simply a meme way of saying three thirds equal one?
>>17082299Most folks don’t mind, but maths types are sticklers for accuracy.
>>17082299cool it with the anti semitism
>>170822920.999..., 1/1 and 1 are representations of the same numerical quantity as an integer, fraction or decimal number.0.333... and 1/3 are also representations of their respective quantity, but they have no integer equivalent because the number they represent is a real/rational, not a natural/integer.
>>17082292>>17082299>>17082580Once you get past the eighth decimal place, the difference doesn't matter to anybody outside of particle physics whatsoever.
>>17082597On computer systems, such small diference get rounded anyway.
There better not be any square roots on this board. I’ve got a bit of a problem with square roots.
Oh look guys, Mister Perfect is here to tell us all what we're doing wrong. Fuck you!
Woah, come on man, let's be rational.
>>17078548I have bad news for you frog...
>>17078568>I is the square root of -1>I'se the square root of -1>Shieeet!
>More than 3.5 billion years ago: Evidence indicates that life already existed on Earth, although its precise origin remains unknown.Holy cow... Science still suck balls.
Are gamers test subjects for the greater AI?
Just found out about the mirror life hypothesis. Could it really wipe out all humans or is this the same as the Y2K scare where nothing will happen once mirror life is created and our bodies will still eliminate mirror life bacteria/viruses as normal?
No.
>>17080471We wouldn't be able to metabolize mirror life. But unless they have some mechanism to reverse chirality in what they are consuming (or some complex series of intermediary pathways that eventually simplifies to that) then they won't be able to metabolize us. The two forms of life would largely end up being inert to one another.There's a ton of caveats here and you can ask "what if's" until the sun comes up. But the bottom line is it's not worth worrying about.
>>17080471And what do you think about this "hypothesis"?https://youtu.be/Jb3m9Z0KK30
>>17080471I'll try with anecdote: Was making a bunch of electronic devices in 90s. Once I messed up the etching of circuit by putting the mask upside-down, giving mirror-result.As those were bigg-i$h pieces, used them anyway - resistors, caps, diodes, all two-feted okay. Transistors needed to be bent specifically, and the IC's got feet reversed upside down - or soldered from the bottom. Salvaged all of them, but gosh, what a waste of time.You can not just 'reverse' something that is made of complex components, as every one is a special case in itself. Parsing the whole DNA and switching every left to right and inverse would simply not work.
Hundreds of millions of stars tightly packed, a small patch of this galaxy. No the darker areas are not gaps they're space clouds in front of them yes there's clouds in space, imagine that! How he fuck do they not fall into each other and why the fuck does all of this stuff even exist? The fucking scale. And all of this is swirling into a huge black hole - flushed down the toilet!
>>17081315>An argument isn't trueStawman. I never claimed it was. Your claim was gravity wasn't even tested, which is complete nonsense.
>>17078508The Lord's creation is as vast as it is beautiful and it just works.
>>17078552he's just trying to make it seem like nonsense
>>17081532Liar. The previous post claims the data is the test of so called matching. But you just admittes data isnt an explanation so how does your claim follow?How would you remove the Sun to test if the effect is still there or not? How come you stated an observation of some apparent phenomenon is an explanation of it. "Gravitational lensing" can only be a name of a phenomenon and is completely unrelated to its cause and theory because it is only apparent data relates to some yet unexplained abberation, piled high upon a million others.
>>17082439>Liar. The previous post claims the data is the test of so called matching. It is a test. Note how that is a different word than "true". You call be a liar but cannot quote the post where I said it.>data isnt an explanation Data allows you to test different explanations, model or theories in physics. You can reject some based on whether or not they fit the data. Models predicting entirely new effects is a pretty strong test.>How would you remove the Sun to test if the effect is still there or not?You wait 6 months of the Earth to be on the other side of it's orbit, and hence the stars are no longer behind the Sun. Their positions can be measured without deflection.>How come you stated an observation of some apparent phenomenon is an explanation of it. "Gravitational lensing" can only be a name of a phenomenon and is completely unrelated to its cause and theory because it is only apparent data relates to some yet unexplained aberration, piled high upon a million others.But it's not "completely unrelated" since the phenomenon was only observed after it was predicted from theory. If the deflection is not caused by gravitational lensing, it will only be discovered by testing the model (GR) against data.
Is there such a mental condition as AI denialism?where no matter how the proofs pile up of how better AI is than us at a given task, the person keeps deriding it and act as if it was a retarded bot of any uses, and slams news of AI incidents or strides as just a PR campaign? These fucking retards are so unseriously delusional that they are endangering us all by telling us everything is fine
>>17082503software is not real. it's fundamentally hardware, you just don't understand it. the word software is meant as an abstraction layer, for still hardware. btw nta, jussain, not even debatablewhoever disagrees is fundamentally wrong, and real computer scientists agree with me.
>>17082507>durr software is actually this other thing because it isn't a thing
>>17082510software is making it easy for you to assemble a hardware state.when you write softwre, you move physical charges in ssd cells, you moron. you are manipulating hardware. that does some shit. it's all hardware. always has been. software is merely an abstraction layer
>>17082506So it is impossible to classify software based on squiggles, but you can classify behavior based on squiggles?
>>17082514This is nonsensical tardbabble from a mental patient. Visualizing some function using circles and lines doesn't put it in any special "program class" nor make it "based on the architecture of the brain". This remains objectively true no matter how many times you vomit a variation of the same delusional brown insect rhetoric.Be sure to reply to me again, my gilded little (You)slave. :^)
>a computer program made by humans, for human purposes, helped solved human made problems, saving human time and resources >humans lose their minds of it
>>17082449No, he was clearly just implying that it would be 2smart4u which is why he was talking about students and he would have said language instead of knowledge if he were talking about AI gibberish and AI already devolves into gibberish that if you don't monitor it and just let it be its own feedback loop.
>>17078129People ultimately don't need people in a capitalist system. There's not enough hate to go around.
>>17082463Are you that youtuber who just makes a bunch of ai models to play monopoly against themselves?
>>17078129>>humans lose their minds of itbecause humans care about moneh. progress and all that is whatever, moneh first, end of. and recognition after moneh. all else be damned.
>>17082504>because humans care about moneh. progress and all that is whatever, moneh first, end of. and recognition after moneh. all else be damned.This accurately describes your """AI"""-pushing corporate handlers, but they're not actually human so you're not technically responding to the OP.
How to scientifically counter the bad health effects of processed foods without stopping eating that tasty food? Any recommendations are welcome.
>>17082470Just need the right Mental and spiritual character.
>>17082470Amy & Tammy way - when you abuse sweets - drink a diet soda or two to counter effect.So in your case it translates to one shot of Ozempic on every fourth pizza.
When is AI solving Alzheimers?
>>17082143Has AI solved dementia yet?
>>17082143>I depend on machinesMan, all you need to do is to recognize reality.
>>17082143science wasn't anyway. Relabel without people intervening.
Why hasn’t OpenAI figured out the abc conjecture yet? I remember a few years ago Mochizuki was fighting with Scholze-Stix about how they just didn’t understand him even though Scholze was a Fields medalist. Can’t ChatGPT frontier models just settle this? they already did a lot other presumably more difficult stuff than just to check one previously-claimed proof. right?
>>17082433Mochizuki is a great mathematician.I would be appalled if OpenAI violates his masterpiece by formally verifying it.
>3 years of super intelligence (formerly artificial intelligence)>still 0 progress with ToEyep it's not intelligent
What about Gwaihir?
>>17065963it solved a nuclear physics problem that was unsolved for57 years and it has designed the most efficient chip for quantum computing ever. You are in full delulu kool aid if you think physics isn't next
>>17069329>Navier-Stokes fiascoholy shit the delulu. You need 5 full trucks of compressed copium a day if you unironically think this.
>>17081543Keep losing your mind with impotent rage. It won't make the 600,000 lines of Lean slop your handlers shat out using a bot swarm's mindless trial and error any more mathematically or physically relevant.
>>17065895>stole the counter-example from users Why didnt they publish it themselves then when they had it solved?
Reality began in a colossal explosion.What does this mean/imply?
>>17082314There's no reason to think reality "started" with the big bang. There's just no available method for us to know anything about what may or may not have happened prior to the big bang. "We don't know what happened" and "nothing happened" are NOT the same thing.
>>17082314Having that opinion means you probably base your concept of reality on a colossal logical explosion where your conceptualization of time gets incredibly murky and convoluted as approaching time t=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=...
>>17082314This is what I assume every single anon looks like
>>17082390Because every single anon is grrrrrrrrrrrrreat (and also named Tony)?
The spunk of the cosmic microwave background came after a build up. How can we solve what happened..
This cannot be fundamentally correct, what if they are all just measuring wrong?
>>17081639So you read it and intentionally took absolutely nothing from it so you could monologue as if you weren't actually talking with someone? Peak autism.
>>17080197electrons are point-shaped
>>17079976its a coincidence
>>17081592>They disproved Bell's TheoremThey didn't. You're confusing terminology you don't actually understand.
>>17080156>There isn't a single potato, but there is a single potato field. All potatoes are merely outgrowths in it.
I'm paying $1,500 a month out of pocket for Rifaximin. What can I take for liver disease instead that isn't Rifaximin or lactulose? Am I just fucked?
>>17082353Cirrhosis can be reversed.
>>17082353>Paying $1,500 a month for... traveller's diarrhea antibioticWhat?Anyways lose weight and stop drinking
