Well?
>>16929486the greeks wouldve figured this out with a piece of string
>>16929495Gemini: The radius of the blue circle is 1.
>>16930112That cant be 1, because from >>16929497 it's 0.8.It's silly
>>16929506>>16929521>muh aikys
>>16929565>>16930112>>16930654I forgot about these. KYS.
try to understand the biopharmacology of ground cumin
I take/ingest- cumin- nutmeg- walnuts- olive oil
>>16928870only orally or up the ass too?
>>16928870becareful of nutmeg it has myristicin
>>16930306Are you always this rude? Or just over the internet?>>16930322No worries, I'm taking only about half a teaspoon daily.
>>16928870>I take/ingest>CumFtfy
How do I become particle physicist?
switch to math
particle physics happen in calc 3so take calc 3 and pass with a c or better
I propose a new field of study for pure mathematicians. I call it "Abstract Theory".Let an "abstraction" be similar to a set or a category, in that, it is a structure that acts as a container for some information. The most fundamental requirement for something to be an abstraction is that it is a representation. That very precise definition also overlaps somewhat into representation theory, which I won't go over.
He stood unshaken, a voice in the stormA man of conviction, a heart rebornHe spoke the truth when the cost was highHe lived for Jesus, unafraid to dieWe are Charlie Kirk, we carry the flameWe'll fight for the Gospel, we'll honor his nameWe are Charlie Kirk, his courage our ownTogether unbroken, we'll make Heaven knownA husband, a father, his family held nearA home built on Scripture, on faith without fearThe world tried to silence, but his voice remainsIn us it echoes, in Christ it sustainsWe are Charlie Kirk, we carry the flameWe'll fight for the Gospel, we'll honor his nameWe are Charlie Kirk, his courage our ownTogether unbroken, we'll make Heaven knownThe battle is raging, the darkness will fallWe rise with his spirit, we answer the callThe truth is eternal, the Cross is our guideWith God as our Captain, we march side by sideComment too long. Click here to view the full text.
What I mean is that in the case of some sort of apocalyptic event which wipes most if not all of human civilization out, would it be impossible for mankind to industrialize once again? I was wondering since it seems like a somewhat common belief that we no longer have sufficient surface non-renewables for such a matter, so I figured I'd ask here considering I cannot find other sources.
renewable energy exists so, who cares. Just keep the population small enough and there wont be scarcity. Or do the human thing of just fighting for these resources, like land around the hydro spots, and keep the losers in poverty.
>>16927490This is a boomer meme. Forestry is sustainable
i think you're right about this, yeah
>>16927490you're a fucking retardt. forest ranger
>>16927450>anti ai propagandaThe most retarded phrase I've heard. The glows are the ones pushing AI slop, they want you dumb and dependent.
>Study on 100 incels in therapy determined it doesn't work on them.>Among incels reporting therapy experiences, 70.8% reported negative outcomes and 7.9% reported satisfaction. None of those forced into therapy (25.8%) reported positive outcomes. Thematic analysis revealed barriers to engagement: (1) “blackpill” ideology attributing sexual/romantic deprivation to immutable factors; (2) conspiracy theories framing therapy as designed to sedate and control; (3) view of therapy as female-biased and hostile to men; (4) practical concerns including cost, privacy, and hospitalization.Of course this science doesn't help anyone with anything except by coincidence (a few people are lonely and just want to talk to someone) but the data is especially clear in this case.Science is starting to remind me of dianetics, where if the magic tin cans don't cure you of your ailments, then unprovable little alien spirits stuck to your skin is automatically the problem. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10503307.2025.2600546#abstract
>>16930621By the sound of it they are getting their data from an incel forum. I kind of feel like that's not very scientific. I would qualify as an incel by their criteria but I don't engage with those communities and am fairly optimistic. They kind of make it sound like if you're an incel you should be on a terror watchlist and need urgent mental health intervention. I have had bad experiences with female psychologists though so I can agree with the incel people on that, I've seen 4 female ones and one male one. The female ones seemed very disinterested in helping me, one even thought I was hitting on her for some reason even though she was like 20 years older than me. Otherwise, I know the problem is me and not the women generally. I don't really blame women if I'm not that appealing.
And an unnaturally long lifespan of 100 years. Could you save science and usher in a new Renaissance and age of discovery? and if so how would you do it?
>>16930608It's easier to rebirth from there than from a mature civilization, yeah.
>>16930601One of the calculations for people in power not to do something was the people don't know enough to control themselves. The weight wasn't enough for a pull through. That's why people are subliminally teaching me about my issues to my face, to get somewhere with themselves over the top.
>>16930630Huh, can you explain that more simply
I give all the resources to myself and resell them at whatever price I want (exclusively to white nations (they must agree to deport all non-whites))
Is there anything aside from possibilities preventing earth's biochemistry from mutating the opposite chirality?
no
>>16930624God.
>>16930628which mass extintion we know of cou'lve been caused by that?late ordovician?
>>16930624Is there anything aside from possibilities preventing water from oxidizing rust into pure iron?
idk about you but im really enjoying their new videos
because derek stepped back
What is THE DEFINITIVE GUIDE/PATH/INFOGRAPH to continue study mathematics for someone who's only taken Calculus I with Optimizations in college maximumAlso at the ripe young age of 28, is it too late to opt for a double major in Mathematics opposed to those dual enrollment Major paths
>>16927050Axler is easier read and a better intro to proofs compared to Spivak
>>16927013>This is crap>Proceeds to suggest a worse version of the same thing
>>16927755kek
>Measure theory, topology, differential geometry, category theoryThis is the perfect roadmap for someone who wants to study abstract bullshit and secure a lucrative career as a community college professor.
>>16921892What a waste of fucking time.If you genuinely work with numbers youll be learning matlab and numerical methodsLearning RK4 to solve odes in 10 minutes is more convenient than reading a 400+ page book
If everything ends forever, that is still infinity.If it doesn't end forever, then eventually it continues, forever. Either infinity exists or it exists. Can anyone refute this logic?
>>16930239>mf presupposes the end of all things>mf still assumes there'll a structure left for all the things to not-exist in
>>16930239>if i repeatedly add 1 to something it somehow becomes infiniteno it does not chud
>>16930470what if i do it a non-finite amount of times?
>>16930239>If everything ends forever, that is still infinity.see that's where you0r argument fails, for ending is within the everything, so even ending ends at some point
>>16930239>If everything ends forever, that is still infinity.No, infinity literally means no ends.
How come there is no relationship between iq or g and mating success?
because penis and iq correlate negative at -.38 so higher iq people dont want to hookup they're insecure lmao
>>16928583>because penis and iq correlate negative at -.38did you plot blacks and east asians on the same graph?
>>16925032>anti-iq tranny pivots immediately to crying about muh polkek
>>16928583Source?
I have any IQ of 370 and can telepathically force women to suck my dick.
>serotonin hitting 5-ht1a receptors blunts your emotions and makes you less empathic (SSRIs do this)>serotonin hitting 5-ht2a receptors intensifies your emotions and makes you more empathic (psychedelics do this)Are psychedelics the true antidepressant?
They definitely can be. Also the most effective treatment for curing addiction, particularly alcoholism. Interestingly, they don't really work for people on antidepressants.
>>16926560First time in /sci/ and happen to find this thread. As a patient taking SSRIs can confirm that these mofos blunt your emotions. But i also take them in tandem with other meds, so take it with a grain of salt
>>16926536>(SSRIs do this)That's not what they do. They force serotonin to stay in synapses longer, which is initially highly stimulatory, but subsequently does 2 main things after a few weeks:1) Downregulates/desensitizes 5-HT receptors in general2) Upregulates enzymes for neurotransmitter breakdown in generalWhen you pay attention to how this "helps" anyone, it's almost exclusively seen as good in those individuals suffering from emotional outbursts. SSRIs stop them from needing to cry or scream or otherwise cause undue emotional damage in their everyday interactions. As far as 5-HT1 goes, that is simply focused on more because it is a better long-term target. It takes weeks or months to cause serotonin neuron desensitization. 5-HT2 has a much more rapid period of adjustment, so desensitization happens quickly and rebounds quickly. However, SSRIs have effects on both.
Serotonergics work well in low doses
>>16926536most 5ht receptors are located in the gi tract and also the mouse tail suspension test is dubious at best. ssri efficacy is modest and causes wiener disease
the ability to build completely authentic looking fake spiders out of various objects and PUPPETEER them with silk threads for some weird reason to make them appear like large living spiders all without god's involvement!
>>16930532>deleterious mutations can just as easily exist imperceptibly throughout the course of generations instead.Yes. This is literally the reason inbreeding is a problem. Most people are carrying recessive alleles for some deleterious trait or another. Inbreeding raises the chances of offspring expressing these traits from ~ 1 in a million to ~ 1 in 16 (very rough calculation but the order of magnitude is what matters here).
>>16928452No
>>16930532>>16930536Sorry for hanmering down this point, but it is a genuinely teachable moment.You made a testable, falsifiable, prediction. That being:>if sexual reproduction were the primary filter for deleterious mutations, then they'd still persist through generations if they were imperceptible.From this, we can extract a hypothesis:>if there are imperceptible deleterious mutations floating around, we should expect to see them become more perceptible through consanguinous pairings.We can investigate this hypothesis by running the following experiment:>observe frequency of congenital disorders among consanguinous and non-consanguinous offspring respectively.Upon doing so we find:>consanguinous pairings result in significantly more disorders than seen in the control group.In this very short discussion, we have used the scientific method to validate sexual reproduction as the primary filter for deleterious mutations in a way which satisfies Popper's falsifiability principle.I obviously don't expect you to concede your entire world view because of this. But I would hope you remember it next time you come across arguments regarding the testability and falsifiability of standard evolutionary model.
>>16928633>Irreducible complexityThis is code for "lack of imagination"
>>16930459>Linking it to a word doesn't change the claim.I was hoping you'd read up on it and realize that people have been explaining this supposedly unexplainable process. Well, not you exactly since I'm not even sure you're capable of conscious thought, but maybe some lurker who felt mystified.>The configuration spaceYou mean the morphospace.>requires arbitrary self-constraintNothing arbitrary about the morphogenetic field.>which invalidates DNA premises generally.It's so "invalidated" people figured this shit out before DNA was actually discovered.>Whichever trigger you point to, whatever line you draw, i cannot map to DNA.I know you can't.
what is the cause of homosexuality
>>16927279Finally a real thinker
Imagine a small village of 50 people with little contact with the outside world. One generation, randomly, a considerable excess of males is born, say 13/20 younglings are male. Now, if a few of them are gay, they can fuck eachother instead of fighting over the females, while still contributing to the community economically. You can imagine a "mechanism" where if a young fellow grows up with many older brothers and not many girls around he becomes attracted to men. Such a gene (or group) is favourable in the long term given the external environment/community. Furthermore, in the circumstance that most of the village's men die, a homo can still provide seed to women readily enough, even if he prefers men.This is just a simple hypothetical scenario, but it proves the conceivability of gayness emerging through evolution. In reality there were far more complicated scenarios and evolution happened over millions of years. The details are impossible to determine as most of the evidence/information is lost, and it would be obscenely complicated even if we could look back and watch it all unfold.
>>16930178Yeah, nah. you are a homo lol
>>16930229Butthurt? The trvth can have that effect...
>>16930257Rofl seethe butt sucker
