How can we avoid getting the Epstein–Barr virus?
>>16852860Masking and antivirus software.Also, avoid prison cells where it seems to be endemic. Multiple choking deaths already.
what's /sci/'s take on it, like let's assume you already have a huge ass solar panel and generate a fuckton of energy and water is cheap and plentyful. what would you do with those settings?
>>16851466Why not just use nitrogen to produce ammonia? It's easy to store and turns into liquid at a very low pressure.
>>16848772There are currently two working nuclear reactors in Israel.
>>16848752Hydrogen is ideally suited for chasing R&D contracts from congress critters and virtue signalling "philanthropists" because the results of any study will always be "More study is needed to make it work."
>>16848752Ah yes, hydrogen fuel, beloved by ignorant and retarded schizo fucks the world over.The best part is when the issues are patiently explained, that yes it has some few small niche uses but it isn't generally viable as an energy replacement, their pig like eyes glaze over and the next day they are back to parroting how we could all be driving hydrogen cars and running our homes and industry on the stuff.Honestly we need to build a giant automatic kicking device, force those dumb fuckers to bend over and give their dumb asses a solid kicking for a few hours. Every day. Along with flat earthers, moon hoaxers, evolution deniers, and every other loud mouthed stupid fuck on this planet. It will not make them any smarter but maybe they will learn to keep their stupid cunt mouths shut.It would also make me feel better too.
Methane, can use already existing LNG infrastructure Solar should continue to drop in cost, its roughly following moores law bc its semiconductor tech
Your perspective is being controlled—and you don’t even know it.This video shows the simple pattern of light and darkness they use to manipulate you.This is the beginning in redefining logic to understand how connected we are with the worldhttps://youtu.be/gsIJH-8Ltso
Whether you've been a psychiatric patient or someone who has worked in psychiatry, what do you think of psychiatry?Is it moral to forcibly drug patients? Or should patients have the right to choose whether they take antipsychotics, since these drugs have a lot of downsides, like movement problems, heart problems, cholesterol problems, etc?
>>16850461>most of which are female, and innoculated with cultural marxism...and how does that make you feel?...
>>16852522I remember this one guy, he was drugged to the fucking brim, the highlights of his life were "and I go there and I buy a chucho de crema", this guy should be treated like a kid, be taken to fun activities qith the other tards and even be taken to therapeutic prostitutes and I mean every single word
>>16852603second
>>16852440>I remember a documentary about some northern country where the standard schizo therapy was just talking with him without locking him up or drugging himThat was norway, barely standard there and the clinic that did this kind of therapy was closed down because insurance wouldn't cover talk therapy any longer for schizophrenia disorders.
>>16852831hmmhh, yeah it takes money to treat people humanly and not like cattle
Say we had the technology to manipulate objects at the nanolevel maybe using nanomachines or some other plot bullshit.How good could you make rocket engines, fuel, computers etc?
>>16849074Where are you trying to get?
>>16785982Build the free radical rockets that got briefly mentioned in Ignition!
>>16786919>>16788478wtf>>16789345someone sabotaging the board i think :/
what a nightmare>>16851123:oi'll have to check that out
>>16852195They could be trying to suppress information about the current state of molecular nanotech. No one thinks it works, but it's actually further along than people think. This situation is beneficial to the one player in the field because by the time they finish scaling up no one will be able to catch up to them. They've been known to hire private investigators for random redditors that were just promoting molecular nanotechnology. Disinformation campaigns are probably not out of the question too
Here is the summary of the Penrose Argument.It explains why, despite being a minority view in physics, Roger Penrose’s theory remains the most scientifically rigorous roadmap to what religious traditions call "God."1. The Physical Argument: Why He Might Be RightMost scientists believe the brain is just a biological computer and consciousness is the software. Penrose argues this is physically impossible.The Gödel "Checkmate":The Premise: In mathematics, there are truths that are obvious to a human but cannot be proven by any algorithm (Gödel’s Incompleteness Theorems).The Implication: If the human mind can understand truths that algorithms cannot, then the human mind is not an algorithm.The Conclusion: To produce the human mind, the brain must be using a law of physics that is non-computational. It cannot be just neurons firing (which is computable); it must be something deeper.The Missing Physics (The Collapse):Penrose argues that Quantum Mechanics is incomplete. We have the "Schrödinger evolution" (waves spreading out), but we don't have a law for why they collapse into a specific reality.He proposes Objective Reduction (OR): The collapse isn't random; it is a fundamental decision made by the geometry of spacetime itself when gravity separates two quantum states.Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
what anyone thinks is of no consequence to the state of reality
>>16852495I agree basically with everything you just said. I don't even really have much to add, I'm not sure there even is much more to say, so I'll just leave it at that.Yeah, I agree.
>>16851715>The Premise: In mathematics, there are truths that are obvious to a human but cannot be proven by any algorithm (Gödel’s Incompleteness Theorems).>The Implication: If the human mind can understand truths that algorithms cannot, then the human mind is not an algorithm.I mean, it seems much more likely that human mind is an algorithm with a capacity to consider unproven mathematical truths as proven if they present a few other, less reliable characteristics, as that works out well enough for most primitive purposes. A greedy algorithm, essentially. It's strongly supported by the capacity of even the greatest human minds to be consistently fucking wrong about things, math included. With quantum antenna inside our brains, it seems weird that we needed Gödel and Penrose to arrive at the ideas that they presented in their time, building those on generations upon generations of iterative mistakes and misinterpretations, when even Cro-Magnons had brains full of those antennae tuned in on the Universal Truth of the meaning-generating engine. >Evolution is efficient. It wouldn't ignore this powerful physics.Most of this board (and humanity at large) are extremely retarded at math, and completely absolutely lack any capacity for "non-computational recognition of truth", at least in regards to math, although generally in regards to most things. Seems like evolution did ignore the power of quantum computing inside the neuron microtubules for these individuals, which happen to account for the absolute majority of human population.
Penroses model explains how inert noble gasses work as anaesthetics despite no classical chemistry.Without quantum effects your eyeballs could not percieve photons.
>>16852808We also know that photosynthesis requires quantum effects.
I do think he was right but I don't see how or even why he came to the conclusions he did?There's nothing in classical physics that suggests time is not constant.
>>16852281Look up the history of electromagnetism, Einstein didn't come up with his ideas out of the blue, and he would be the first to say that.
If time is not constant, and space and time are just derivatives of each other, then space isn't constant either.
>>16852288>that means the speed of light is the same*holds up piece of glass*
>>16852576I was just thinking about that experiment myself, the one with the super cooled liquid that slowed down the light beam a bit right?
>>16852281Special Relativity basically fixes CM to make it compatible with EM
Your perspective is being controlled—and you don’t even know it.This video shows the simple pattern of light and darkness they use to manipulate you.This is the beginning in redefining logic to understand how connected we are with the world
Ok GPT incredibly interesting post
Why the scientific consensus says that women and men have the same iq if imperial data contradicts this statement?
>>16851460On what data?
>>16850255>Why are some people better at taking tests?They follow orders. They study more. This isnt general intelligence, it measures qualities you want in employees.Intelligence isnt being good at following orders and reading manuals
>>16851547That anon you replied to was obviously talking about IQ tests specifically, not typical classroom regurgitation tests.
>>16851513Test batteries.
>>16850666Why?
do med students really study 8 hours per day?
>>16852589>med studentsSwallow one after breakfast and one before bedtime.
>>16852589Applied biology is fun
looking forward to AI replacing all of these dunning kruger midwits smelling their farts because they spent a decade memorizing textbooks so they could go on to scam the american people.surgeons are cool though. they are actually useful and talented.
I only study 1-2.5h of anki a day (150-300 cards). The rest is philosophizing with my classmates and listening to lectures, and asking questions in the clinic. Also, talking about my day to people could "count" as studying, but I don't count it. Conventional studying would put me up to 6-8 hours a day though. Fuck conventional studying. I didnt it for 3 years in UG and hated it.T. M1
>>16852589Of course not! They tend to get depressed after the first semester and just cheat their way through based on previous exams
Remember when you got totally swarmed by retards for pointing out that those genetically engineered “dire wolves” weren’t actually real genuine dire wolvesIs this not proof that humans are fucking retarded and don’t understand biology and would rather join in on the hype and listen to their feelings than think critically?
>>16845305So if i fuck someone with a beard it’s absolutely in no way paedophilia?
>>16843750That's a male husky and female high content wolfdog, both intact. Imagine the fun he could have given the chance. It would be like (You) fucking some 8 foot tall prehistoric huntress.
>>16839003No I cant recall doing this.
:S
All your procedures generate paranoia
Why does nobody take Geometric Unity seriously?
>>16851040Area 51 is carved out of the Nevada Test Site, which is entirely under the jurisdiction of the DoE/NNSA. EG&G is a DoE contractor that was originally chosen to film nuclear weapons detonations with high speed cameras and wire up the warheads for the bomb tests, probably because they were former MIT alums with Vannevar Bush. As far as the DoE being involved with UFOs, they either are nuclear powered or produce shitloads of gamma radiation as a byproduct if the propulsion mechanism. Either way, it falls squarely under the jurisdiction of the DoE, and what branch of the military works hand in hand with the DoE because they operate 40+ nuclear reactors...?
>>16851040Weinstein unironically hit the nail partially on the head. He thinks that SUNY Stony Brook is the nexus of (((UFOs))), which I'm sure he is partially right. What does Stony Brook have in common with the general point I'm trying to make?? They run Brookhaven National Lab. Guess who also jointly runs the accelerator facilities at Brookhaven with the DoE? The Office of Naval Research. It's more about how he's missing out on all the other NatLab and DoE affiliated university research at places other than Stony Brook. People forget that our national labs aren't run directly by the government, they are managed by big university systems (U of TX, U of CA, SUNY, etc.) and glownigger defense contractors (LockMart, Batelle, Honeywell).
>>16851390I've heard that Stony Brook's OPSEC is almost non-existent though. Area's that are supposed to be secure are left open etc. I think (((Avi Loeb))) was saying the same thing about Stony Brook. I'm somewhat uncomfortable with the Loeb-Weinstein dynamic duo lol
>>16831279Because it's essentially nerdoid word salad.
>>16851595I'm sure that they aren't just leaving secured areas open willy nilly at Brookhaven, anon.
>>16847704Ok but what is this in planck units
>>16849059the lag
>>16848123>>16848093>>16847990there is nothing wrong with D and Hdoing electrodynamics in media would be a pain in the anus without them
>>16851954It’s not wrong. But there’s nothing fundamental about it either. They’re emergent, macroscopic fields. Zoom in enough and they suddenly don’t make sense.
>>16847920\thread
I'm about to finish my course (and a book) on discrete mathematics; the next one will be a course (and a book) on algorithms... Could you please recommend a book to read more about set theory? I'm fascinated by the topic; it's beautiful, and I want to read more about it, but there are so many books that I don't know which one to choose.
>>16849720i use gemini a lot, for things like, "tell me if my reasoning in this proof is sound" or "help me to understand certain things", it is very useful, but i like to get the knowledge from books, i enjoy it more that way, keeps the magic alive :')
Omg I love AI! It's *perfect* for learning.
>>16846277Naive Set Theory by Paul Halmos is essential. Very short and he actually explains the relationship between set theory and the Peano "axioms" (the recursion theorem). After that you may want to read about Dedekind sections (optional) before moving on to real analysis. I recommend Elementary Analysis: The Theory of Calculus by Kenneth A. Ross
>>16846277I really like the newest edition of Kunen's Set Theory: An Introduction to Independence Proofs, but if you don't have experience with proofs in higher math you're going to be lost immediately
>>16846277Kunen's "Set Theory" and Lawvere's "Sets for Mathematics" are the best introductions by far.
>>>/b/942166092theoretical basis of electrogravitic propulsion just dropped
>>16851578>I have a feeling >>16841409 was just OP samefagginghmm no i'm not OP. I'm waiting for gallium to arrive to try>>16842201my work is virtually all pre-quantum and has a great distaste of gauge theories . Anon and I share a very keen interest in the longitudinal forces and the magnetic vector potential.
>>16851614nta but keep us updated on your experiments.
>>16847871It's not a new idea though. OP believes in old ether physics, as far as I can tell, the only "innovation" here is coining some differential geometry terms to describe it with but even on that front it's far too incomplete and mostly just hallucinations.
>>16844104https://youtu.be/WHEZxSSO2vA
>>16851827taxpayers are funding this btw, all because this retard was in the army for 3 years in his early 20s and developed schizophrenia
