Was it ever worth becoming a doctor in the US?
>>16555162it was before medicine was taken over by government and insurance companies.now doctors are just cogs in a giant industrial machine.
>>16555162are you shitting tits right now?doctor usa is like top job, preem benefits.twatslice
Why is science so heavily censored?What are they trying to hide?
>>16555516I think it was something I came across on unz., they were talking about the worls of men like gunnar heinsohn who found that most of the historic timeline of the first millenium is fake and that the scribes duplicated events to make it fit. remarkably one example they split st paul into 3 entirely separate groups all in the same area of antioch but separated aross several centuries. they push events they didn't like deeper into historywhich brings up sumer/chaldeamy research led me to sumer and the legacy of debt jubilees.my thoughts were that what jesus was was a guy promoting a debt jubilee to undo all the problems rome was having with their debt problem.I suspect the cult of rome took it over.and redirected it but I've not properly followed that up, part of it is [robably because it started in places like alexandria so rome wanted to monopolise control.and then there's the really weird parts about britain and the great cataclysm that left traces of black earth all across europe and north africa from london toe memphis
>>16555527>gunnar heinsohn who found that most of the historic timeline of the first millenium is fake and that the scribes duplicated events to make it fit.It is a very popular theory today. But I am sceptical about it. It could be the truth, sure, but I think we should wait a little longer, so that ai is going to make science of its own. So far it can only parrot the consensus, thus it is on par with regular academicians.
>>16555449Yes, hello. I would like one McNutt, hold the salt.It's because you have one political class largely made up of actors who just want what they want. I was always racist growing up, but I always wanted to address any racial shortcomings through genetic engineering and social conditioning. These people in the meanwhile believe that any evidence contrary to their world view is just people out to wrongly target others. We're both bigoted, but how we approach these things is different. Like how a lot of dead scientists truly believed in God but didn't want to pervert the truth of their discoveries because they believed it would be profane because God made it, and now you get a lot of types that just lie because they don't believe there is significant oversight to punish them.
>>16555536>It is a very popular theory today.I can see it, I try to stick to the more legitimate inconsustencies highlighted by the archaeology not the wild speculators. It definitely makes a few things more logical timeline wise.A weakness I see is heinsohn's affinity with jewish organisations and warmongerers and that soviet russian guy running speculative estimates off of astrological movements
>>16555510>>16555527>>16555559Did you curved the conversation manifesting a sophisticated form of censorship?
Please read if at least one person applies some of this things can change (in qr)
your curiosity wont get the better of you
this is the QR code linkhttps://www.mediafire.com/file/1yosotguz8ldt7o/Human_mechanics.pdf/fileit's just some schizo paper
you're a fucking retard if you think people would actually scan some random qr code on the internet from a complete stranger, on 4chan of all places. do you think i want my system compromised? no, i don't and neither does anyone else here you fucking moron
Grad students and ex grad students>who was the best grad student you knew>What did you wish you knew or did before becoming one>How to be a great grad student
>>16555301define “best” and “great”
The thing all the best grad students I knew had was luck, some kind of intrinsic drive, and a work ethic. Luck being the most important of these for success beyond just finishing and having a few publications.I wish I had known in advance that my recent run of good luck would not hold.
Explain this.
>>16547173Just two jets flying in Melbourne
>>16547312The rich guy is a democrat. Trump needs to proscribe all billionaires that financed or incurred in woke activities, so it will be the duty of every man to kill them and reclaim their property.
>>16547173
>>16555233Huhuhhuhuahu
>>16555233that can be explained by conservation of momentum
We’ve got the Navier-Stokes equations, but solving them for turbulence feels like taming a hurricane with a napkin. It’s chaotic as hell, and we only describe it statistically, not deterministically.I ask:Is turbulence fundamentally unsolved, or do we just lack the computational power to brute-force it?Why does laminar flow break into turbulence at certain Reynolds numbers? What's actually happening at the transition?Is there a clear boundary for turbulence, or is it just a messy spectrum?
>>16554881Messy spectrum. Chaos theory in general seems to be that way. There was an old blog on Lorenz attractors that showed how as one coefficient increased, the system would oscillate periodically, semi-periodically, then increasingly chaotically. Similarly, three body systems are famously chaotic, yet the sun-earth-moon system is mostly predictable. And with fluids, there's obviously the Reynolds number.There's clearly a threshhold that can be calculated.
>>16554891>What would you brute-force anyway?aerodynamics for videogames like Kerbal Space Program. and no, the state of the art is not "good enough"
>>16555247Good luck with that
>>16555247Ferram does a decent job. The main problem with vanilla aero in KSP is that it just assigns coefficients of lift and drag to each part independently, which leads to cheesy bullshit like clipping wings together. Ferram calculates the drag and lift of the entire vehicle and makes it a function of Mach number.
>>16554881>Why does turbulence exist?Because it likes to!
Aren't irrational numbers... well... irrational?
>>16555113>Shut up and calculate.This is why there is a crisis in science.
>>16554995>[...] to zero using limits.Limits are boundaries.And boundaries are exactly somewhere.Example:B = {(x, y): x^2 + y^2 < r^2} = open diskP = {(x, y): x^2 + y^2 = r^2} = circleW = {(x, y): x^2 + y^2 > r^2} = infinite "corona"P is the boundary of B.>>16554987In that image, B is black, P is purple, and W is initially white.
The accompanying plot is of the following interval.0 ≤ x < 1The foregoing interval is half closed and half open.The point at 0 is closed.The point at 1 is open and represents: 0.999...
>>16555580omg!what mysterious numbers are these?
Is this accurate? Is the term "side effects" in terms of medicine just a less dangerous sounding euphemism for poisoning that was developed in order to help scientists make more money selling poison?
>>16523354Semantics and NLP are powerful tools
>>16523403>if you drink 20 gallons of water in a day you will die from "water poisoning."correct
>>16537288So what do you call it when a chinese royal is assassinated? An "intentional side effect"?
>>16553163They work particularly effectively on people with mental monologues because language controls their thought processes and thinking abilities
>>16523403How can people possibly disagree with what you just said? These are actual facts. This is how it works and somehow you have people bickering and squabbling. You didn't pick a side, you just explained how the development of these drugs works and for some reason that ruffles feathers.
Which way, white man?
>>16536549Kind of a retard take to call vectorization an antipattern in a language called MATLAB ("MATrix LABoratory")The fact that matlab is proprietary is a genuine downside, though torrents exist. Still I wouldn't recommend sticking to matlab, unless you're the type of stemcel who's gonna end up banging your head on simulink anyway. Then again perhaps people should not listen to me; if they did, they'd end up using fortran (likely for something it's not good for)
>>16536372if your uni or corporation pays for matlab then you might as well use itvery simple and makes very nice graphicseverything is built-inPython can pretty much do all those things, but you need to learn packages like numpy, scipy and other shitit gets easier every year so I'm pretty sure Python is the future of scientific programming
>>16536670ah yes, possibly the worst programming language in the world, even worse than perl
>>16536549Python gives bad practices for software development (and more generally how a computer works). But you can somehow recover from it.With Matlab, it's over.
>>16536573I think the GIL was "removed" in last stable releases.
As far as natural disasters goes, Michigan is pretty boring. Of course you need to stay out of cities like Detroit, Flint, and Benton Harbor, but those are due to human disasters.
>>16555404either trolling or a 20IQ monkey retard
>>16554684The only way to fight climate change is to massively decrease the population of China and India. Every other action is completely irrelevant.
>>16555610or just someone who did a geological survey before buying land and made sure not to buy worthless land that floods after a little rain
>>16555373Katrina was an artificial storm
My wife has turned into a belligerent retard since taking this shit, what is the story with ozempic fellas? I had a real bad feeling about it from the start
>>16555576yes basically thatalthough I remember some sort of issue with rottingh food in their abdomens
>>16555576I have eaten giant puffball mushroom before.It's not particularly tasty, very heavily carried by marinades and breadcrumb frying
>>16555588don't they actually use something stronger than ozempic
>>16555608Not sure, I can see the fat loss version being a higher dose.
>>16555611I think they had to relabel it so they could get it through on some other legal technicalitythey markted it like crazy though.
BH singularity >A mathematical artifact that to interpret physically would constitute an over-fitting of a necessarily limited model Vacuum energy>Noooo like literally the distribution suggests a nonzero probability of a particle being there! So its, like, basically there!!!Why are QMfags like this?
yeah you're right everything's just made up we should just sit around and jack off our subatomic cocks with thermal paste
i believe so, but you can't go forwards in time faster without imploding
>>16554961>you can't go forwards in time faster without implodingIf relativity to be believed, then it's the exact opposite. One can travel forwards in time by warping gravity aka time dilation. Time is relative to motion. Hence space-time.https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11336052/Going backwards is extremely difficult due to entropy. It would take a nearly infinite supply of energy to inverse the flow of time. Even then you would have to fold spacetime in on itself to move backwards to a point in the past.
>>16555567the only way you could go back in time is you'd rewind the whole universe and everyone forgets everything that happened. in this universe. anything else is just weird as far as logic goeswe also have no choice but to travel in the future at various rates depending on our position, it's just undetectable in our everyday experience.
>>16554961If backwards time travel was possible, we would have seem the the effects of it already.
>>16555579>the only way you could go back in time is you'd rewind the whole universe and everyone forgets everything that happened.Scientifically explain how to defy entropy and the laws of physics. Keep in mind going to the future stays entirely within these limits. You can witness the heat death of the universe sure, but you can never come back to this moment in time ever. >it's just undetectableAh, so you can't explain or verify your results. /x/ is probably a better place for bait.
>>16555592>Scientifically explain how to defy entropy and the laws of physics.I didn't say it's doable, just going through the logic of it. You can't go in some other place which is our past. Don't know how you'd rewind our universe while still keeping your memories. Sounds weird. So if we ever did it we wouldn't detect it. Any moment could be past for us, without memory of any future. The logic of backwards time travel doesn't make any sense.Forward time travel makes sense and constantly happens, just look at your phone with GPS on, dot being where you actually are is direct proof we always and constantly time trave to the future. Issue is GPS satellites are far enough that required precision shows the time travel, makes it a problem. But at individual level we can't detect it with our senses, it's irrelevant. But it constantly happens.
>median verbal IQ (which includes verbal reasoning, comprehension, working memory, and mathematical computation) of 126How can this be replicated?
>>16553801cuts both ways
>>16553679If I remember this dataset right weren't the highest performers quakers?
>>16548515wrong afif this were true then we'd see a noble prize every year from jews
>>16548746>>16548772Iirc the whole "jews are higher IQ meme everybody quotes comes from single study of children (6-12 i think?) amongst the private schools in new york.The jewish one scored the highest average on verbal IQ
knowledge hungry wizards, i humbly knock upon your grand tower libraries to be enlightened in the ways of learning. what techniques do you employ to assimilate knowledge quickly and efficiently? how does one start the process of learning, and keep momentum? any and all advice is greatly appreciated, o' most powerful wise ones!
study something that you actually enjoy learning about. i've taken a liking to quantum physics lately. keep looking into different subjects and see what you find fascinating, whether it's biology or computer science or even something creative like art. you keep momentum by being genuinely passionate about something. and you also have to be willing to be wrong sometimes. making mistakes is one of the best ways to learn. and books, too. i think a lot of people these days are too quick to write off books as useless because of how accessible information is nowadays on the internet, but if you think about it, a book is far more structured learning than if you were to go on google and try to figure everything out yourself. a quality book will tell you how something works start to finish, top to bottom. an even better one will give you some practical exercises in the subject to try out. so do not discard books. after all, every wizard needs a spellbook, right? keep your tome of arcane knowledge close
>>16555378Anything that works, excluding watching videos. They are most shitty kind of information you can ingest.
>>16555378First for Ars Notoria
>>16555447This. "Find something you're passionate about" although cliché is legit advice, once you find something that really sparks your interest it all becomes a cake.Know what works for you as well, for example I structure my study sessions in such a way that I spend most of my time struggling my way through exercises and just a tiny amount reading theory, i.e. The Pareto principle, nevertheless this varies across subjects. Other than that I would say spaced repetition does deserve the hype, in my opinion slamming Anki shit is worth it. >>16555442Most videos are just watered down-microwave cooked material, nothing but failure comes from superficial study.
