Why do we have an innate reaction of disgust/horror when we see an image of a virus? It should just be abstract geometry to us, given we never evolved to see that small and it's only using recent technology that we can. Is it ancestral memory from when we were single celled organisms?
>>16885845Viruses look different depending on family it belongs to. Also viruses don't really look like abstract shapes. Viruses are really tiny, like we are talking nanometers, so they often simply the design in illustrations.
>>16885845Because viruses look like insects. Your one looks like a spider. These ones look like cockroaches.
>>16885845I am pretty sure Bacteriophages are engineered nanobots made by some sort of aliens who visited earth and tried to exerpiment us. They unleashed them and then ran away like assholes Change my mind
Why do we have an innate reaction of horror to the spongebob closing credits music?
>>16885845>weLiterally never crossed my mind
Um, what?Genetics and evolution are inseparable from the environment because the environment is the primary force that shapes how genes are expressed and determines which genetic traits are selected for survival and reproduction. This dynamic interaction works in multiple ways, making a simple "nature vs. nurture" distinction obsolete. Is “environment, not genetics” a form of cope? The same way trans people insist on using different words because they don’t like the words people normally use? The whole ‘correlation is not causation’ thing is also retarded.
There's also a sociological aspect to IQ. If you're doing an IQ test among people who value IQ, they will try hard to get a good score. If you're doing an IQ test among people who don't value IQ, they won't try to get a good score. There are communities where people will purposely 'prove' that they are retards so that they aren't seen as intelligent for various reasons. Being seen as intelligent can be a curse because it can put a target on your back.
>>16877471smart frog
>>16877471Indeed. This explains why the Pakistani Muslim aryans have +25 IQ points over the Indian Hindu rape rats, and are far more civilized. Hindus breed like cockroaches and are selected for raping, being pedos, stealing, and lying. After millions of years of concentrating those genes through inbreeding, you get India.
>>16880649We Jews really are naturally high IQ. My pure ashkenazi family was literally living in the ghetto and shit but we all grew up to be high IQ chads. You goyim are literally niggers to us intellectually.
>>16887711>>16887717Verbal IQ for the merchants
>at the fundamental level everything is just a wave function, particles arent real, position and velocity isnt real, its all just probability clouds>or its not a wave but a field, fuck if I know>but if you observe something this wave function collapses and "shrinks" down to a particle>this is all real and has been experimentally verified countless timesum... what the fuck? how is this not a dead ringer for simulation theory? what is the physical mechanism behind this collapse? how does the wave function know its being observed? this shit makes NO FUCKING SENSE WHATSOEVER. I demand answers, what the fuck?
I always assumed particles are just distortion in space-time shrinking it up defined by a wave function which then defines a quantum field which.. leads to superstrings, which leads to "particles" because this distortion of shrunken space-time gives us the illusion of particles due the topological folding of the shrunken space-time distortion But then again.. what the fuck is space-time even made of
i think the core issue is this idea of wave function and particles. the best way to think of it as state vectors. if that state vector is described as a wave function so be it, but a better model might come around, but it will always fundamentally be a state vector and that's what matters. >not a wave>shrinks down to a particleimo all of this is more an issue of the semantics of using the terms wave and particle to describe things at the quantum level, since it brings its own baggage of preconceived notions from the macroscopic world like propagation and arbitrary precision/extent.
>>16883064It's a simulation retards, simulation solves all the paradoxes quite easily. Just embrace the truth anons. You'll feel better for it.
>>16883064Why did I have to get stuck in the simulation to test how long a civilization can survive while everything becomes fake and gay?
>>16883064This is literally how they optimise video games to run on hardware. Everything that isn't displayed on screen is downscaled to save processing power. 411 yeah reality is most likely a simulation, or some boson flying out of your eye just screws with the wave function and they don't have a accurate messurement of it.
What I have are a large number of papers which detail solutions to long-standing problems in a number of physical disciplines as well as many inventions. I decided to give my inventions away after discovering that under the U.S. patent system, a single patent costs $10,000. If an invention has military applications (many of my inventions do) the government can literally throw a person in jail simply because they sought patent protection. By driving people away from the option of obtaining patents through both probibitive costs and through legal threats, the government has rendered moot its own Invention Secrecy Act.This is a significant release and for much of the content, it is the first time it is being shared here, so it is likely new to the denizens, many of whom I understand are university students. I am sharing this because I want to put my work before researchers in a position to confirm the hypotheses and to prototype the devices. These really should have been sent to DARPA, but the "little people" out there like you and me "don't meet the eligibility requirements" to make submissions because we "are not business owners." The ingenuity of our ideas is not amongst the government's considerations; only the social class of the prospective proposer.The monograph deals with optics, computing, propulsion, remote metrology, precision navigation and timing, metallurgy, energy and medicine.Please feel free to pass the information along to any interested party.https://archive.org/details/Collection_of_Ideas_DARPA_Didnt_WantTechnical questions can be forwarded to the POC listed on the Internet Archive page.P.S. I have taken the liberty of sending this information to Saint Petersburg State University... two years ago.Have a nice day.
>>16883218That's a hysterical typo by the way, but in any event, everything you just said is incorrect.There have been countless documented cases of the government preventing commercialization of novel inventions and paying literally zero. "Royalties" are not automatic. Businesses which want to manufacture patented product invented by another business or individual can do so without getting sued if they reach a civil agreement called a Royalty Agreement with the company.There is no legally codified financial compensation reflexive to the government's useage of intellectual property belonging to an inventor when secrecy is invoked. Invoking secrecy is an easy way for them to be able to build things without paying for whatever it is. Oftentimes, however, they don't even use whatever it is and the inventor is nonetheless prohibited from commercializing. In the cases in which the military does use something, the original inventor is never going to be able to make money from the idea because if the government assigns the development task to Hughes Research Laboratories, for example, they are going to have an insurmountable business advantage over someone who has never built the product before and who likely has no factory in which to build it.Some people have sued for financial compensation in response to ISA gagging orders, but there has not been a single documented case of anyone winning a penny.I would argue that anyone who has a plausibly useful idea who is told that he or she may not patent it, in effect, through the instigation of the $10,000 fee which is assessed by patent attorneys (Pro Se is cheaper but rejected 97% of the time) would have a cause of action against the government.
>>16882959>under the U.S. patent system, a single patent costs $10,000This isn't true.
Oh, and for anyone who thinks I am just throwing jargon around, I have received confirmation of plagiarism coming from a prestigious research institution, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden Rossendorf.I've been sharing my ideas with quite a large number of people, but I was surprised to find that HZDR had ripped off a fairly important paper. On December 16, 2025, HZDR's Dr. Ralf Schutzhold published a paper suggesting the radical notion that gravity waves affect light in a measurable way and that the inverse is also true: That the emission of light generates gravity ripples.https://www.hzdr.de/db/Cms?pNid=99&pOid=76137This is an incredibly important insight. Unfortunately for HZDR, it isn't truly original. I have been suggesting exactly this since as early as 2011 and it comes up repeatedly in my writing which, I JUST SO HAPPENED TO FORWARD TO HZDR IN MARCH OF 2025.Although Bernd Schroeder never got back to me, he was the only person from HZDR I ever contacted about this. He works in their Media Relations department. Exactly nine months later, Dr. Schutzhold published information which was dismissed as insane by American research institutions for many years and which could only have come from my monograph.Judge for yourself what is really going on here.
>>16884725>for yourselfYou published to /sci/ first, I will not entertain alternate claims.
What exactly is unique about this
How do you know that even though the future was like the past in the past, that the future will be like the past in the future? and what is your basis for knowing that?
>>16878293Those imply physics does change.
>>16878749Literally more useful to consider it a psyop if you don't have a metaphysical intent with entertaining the idea.
1. You don't know how anything works2. See 1.3. Composition detection servers infer pretty likely naught
>>16770206Causal inference.If I do x how does future y change
>>16820465Life needs Chaos, novelty needs a way to refute cyclicity.I have to implement a MUD system for this result, which requires an exit condition for all rooms. The use of architecture contrary to this requirement may not exist in any allocation of scalar dynamics without a fully reasoned petition. Mutex infrastructure will use an additional calculation for two possible models of client-centric fog of war mapping until a new supporting generality is found compatible.We should append it is in record an off-color persona has affinity for this paradigm. A hypothesis toward recognition of individual creative projects may prove to hold cosmic import when we have formalized relevant detail.Note this exit policy overlaps with prior intuition regarding scalar procedure for cults. Early as 15, or even 10 and 9 years of age, the freedom of leaving will prove essential to disproving duress.Symmetry insufficient
Kary Banks Mullis was an American biochemist who invented the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in 1983, revolutionizing DNA amplification for genetics, forensics, and medicine. He won the 1993 Nobel Prize in Chemistry (shared) and the Japan Prize.Regarding PCR during pandemic (which he _weirdly_ died before witnessing), Mullis stated the technique amplifies DNA exquisitely but doesnt tell you that you are sick/infected or prove causation/infectivity alone. He warned against misinterpreting high-cycle results (like detecting non-viable fragments), a point often cited (and debated) in discussions of pandemic case inflation via cycle thresholds.His warnings were largely confirmed by 2025 Güntheret al studyhttps://www.frontiersin.org/journals/epidemiology/articles/10.3389/fepid.2025.1592629/fullThis study models nationwide PCR and IgG data, estimating only 14% (kek) of PCR-positive tests reflected actual infections triggering detectable antibodies. This implies 86% overestimation of infections which proves PCR tests absolutely useless. PCR detected non-infectious viral fragments, inflating case counts and undermining pandemic policies reliant on PCR incidence. It means that up to 90% of people diagnozed during "pandemic" as covid infected were not infected by SARS-CoV-2 virus at all.Vid-rel: one of Mullis last interviews about Fauci:https://x.com/RedpillDrifter/status/1926041698834031002He died shortly after giving this interview, few months before the "covid-19 pandemic".
>>16883324>Worthless pharma scumbag doesn't like the guyAnother point for Kary then, I guess.
Why was this found on PCR swabs?
>>16881691>which is why you fix the cycle number somewhere reasonableWhat is a reasonable cycle count?
>>16884011>You didn't care to pass this info on to the experts in 2020/21?they did that>>16886046depends on what you're doing
>>16886490testing for covid
Thoughts on natural deduction?
>>16885047>construct number 2Hidden assumption that this is necessary.
>>16884499What is the time complexity of recognizing an applicable rule of inference to use in a deduction?
>>16884919Yes they are called dependently typed proof assistants. Natural deduction is just a formalism of Aristotle's syllogisms.What you want though is causal AI where some model can do inductive reasoning on it's own and those are still primitive.
>>16885096>what's the assumption?That the number 4 exists and that you can pair items with it to count. Prove the number 4 and prove counting.
>>16887636Define the number 4 for me and I'll prove it exists
Hawking radiation arises not from quantum field effects at the event horizon, but from a persistent time-reversal mechanism within the singularity region itself, where extreme spacetime curvature causes the geometry to fold back upon itself, reversing the timelike direction for infallen matter and energy.This ongoing reversal enables continuous outward propagation of the accumulated degrees of freedom through the same causal structure, manifesting externally as thermal emission with the observed power scaling ∝ 1/M2.Distinct white holes are unnecessary; their characteristic expulsion is simply the intrinsic emission aspect of every black hole, with complete evaporation occurring when the reversed outflow fully depletes the singularity mass.
>>16882981This unironically has some truth to it for me because all the BEC black hole analogue experiments seems to indicate that the experimental setups are also producing time reversal effects ala phase/time conjugation.
>>16882981Your claim can be defended as a reinterpretation of where the bookkeeping happens, not as a denial of Hawking radiation itself. Instead of treating the event horizon as a special physical site where particles are “created,” you shift the mechanism to the interior: extreme curvature near the singularity forces spacetime to fold back on itself, producing an effective time-reversal channel. In this view, infallen matter and energy are not destroyed but continually recycled into an outward-propagating mode through the same global causal structure, while the horizon remains just a boundary, not an active emitter. The exterior observer only sees a steady thermal flux; the microscopic conversion can live deep inside without contradicting what’s measured.This picture also naturally explains why separate white holes are unnecessary. The outward emission normally associated with a white hole is simply the emission aspect of every black hole, operating continuously rather than explosively. As mass decreases, the interior reversal drains the stored degrees of freedom until nothing remains, completing evaporation. The familiar mass-dependent power law then follows from geometry alone: larger holes have weaker curvature and leak more slowly, smaller ones radiate faster. Framed this way, the proposal doesn’t overthrow standard results—it offers a different causal narrative, with the payoff being potential new handles on information flow and late-time evaporation rather than a new temperature formula.
>>16882981A second time dimension analogous to a phase angle spreads out making temporal pathways non-unique.
>>16882981Maybe quantum fluctuations expand on the superfluidity of a black hole, as the loss of the energy.
>>16885358Not sure how you are measuring this
There was life on Mars, and there may still be life especially under the surface. This is a fact and stop pretending it's a question that's up in the air that could. And no, it's not just these fossils. There's multitude of evidence that all converge on the same answer that there was life on the surface of Mars.
>>16884544ok i chuckled
>>16884571So a parent body formed that shit and delivered it to Earth. But why is the parent body even needed if Earth can just produce it itself like the parent body?
>>16885213it's possible it is a part of a larger planet that both was part of, it's unlikely to be a seeder
>>16884544troll posting Exhibit A.
>>16884544All based on assumptions and sloppy "data." The whole "life on Mars" stuff is a big tax money grift.
Was he right all along?
What if there is just no such thing as a "point" in reality and any objects that appear to be "point like" are in fact rings?
>>16885989>1-dimensional pointpardon, but i'd have you know that a point is 0D, kind regards
>>16886017>n-no, i didn't lose the argument, even though i'm talking about something completely different from the argument and in fact explicitly avoiding the argumentyou lost
>>16887082correct, that was an error in elocution, the statement still stands however>>16886314was this post deleted because it spake truth?
>>16887259pretty much; along with the rest of what he posted being essentially unassailable.
https://warosu.org/sci/thread/16885690You can view the full thread here.
If so, why is that?
>>16867396something to do with biological varianceif they have black skin and we have white skinif asians are lactose intolerant and we are notthe brain would likely be the same way
>>16867396They arent human.
>>16886072>DEI will only mess with up meritocratic systemsAnon DEI is EXTREMELY rare. Why bring up something that is outright constant being cut back and constant fucked over by private companies. No system has ever been meritocratic and it's myrrh that has been spread for way too long.
>>16886266Not even close. How deluded are you to think they are remotely close?>>16886286The thing is they always shifted the goalposts. they never wanted to acknowledge Africans having ANY system of transferring and preserving knowledge whether it was written or oral because that would requires having to do the bare minimum of research and/or acknloedgement
>>16886072>They indeed are, but you're not allowed to say it's genetic. People prefer to dismiss any measure of intelligence than admit the obvious.No one cares about IQ test scores IRL. People are jacking off to having 105 or 107 but that's not even an SD above the mean. The actual levels of intelligence worth a shit to laud and sing praises about is like 130+ at the absolute minimum and even then most people who score that high don't amount to much because most careers where having a high as fuck IQ like that would help a lot PAY LIKE SHIT or are mind-crushing and stress-inducing to the point your body gets fucked by it.
So I guess im just dumb but I was reading about what a "calorie" is, like in food, and it brought me to Carbohydrates and every Wikipedia article kept talking about "energy" in food and I dont know what they mean by "energy" and it talks about "1 kilocalorie is 4184 joules" and I just dont get it how can you even measure energy of a hamburger or a human body?
>>16887186no you idiot. plaque builds up on artery walls because of micro fractures in the arteries. micro bleeding occurs platelets stop the bleeding and build up.the micro fractures are caused by chronic vitamin C deficiency because the minimum daily requirement for vitamin C is at least one order of magnitude too low. most people with arteriosclerosis are borderline scurvic.
>>16886214It's because every time people ask a question to try and learn something some asshat like you comes along to make them feel bad for not already knowing what they're trying to know, and then some other asshat comes along to accuse anyone who does answer such questions of being an arrogant know it all. The answer to your question "what the ever loving fuck are people being taught in grade school now" is: how to behave like women.
>>16881567Fun factThe calorie is based on the Energy Balance Model or EBM and it's a broken model that ignores the laws of physics.A more accurate model you can search papers for was created by real physicists and is the mass balance model where a differential equation can model perfectly exactly how much weight you will lose or gain based on which foods you intake that the body converts to mass. This model explains why some meme diets who are high in calories still result in weight loss.
>>16887451BULLSHIT almost all of those threads have willfully stupid OP's. who argue and nit pick shit they were asking about. fighting against EVERY response. OP is either a complete retard or a troll.
>>16881567Mr. Wizard, a popular science show for kids, had an episode where he literally burns food and measures the energy to explain calories. See in the 20th century we used mass media to teach kids science. The Discovery channel and The Learning Channel were wall to wall documentaries mostly about nature and science. You could put those channels on a TV and fall asleep to relaxing nature videos and a soothing narrator telling you about science and biology. The world was better then, kids were educated and not turned into Tik Tok addicts. You were robbed of a life of value anon, you should have never needed ask this question. You have been betrayed and left to rot like a pig in the sun. Many such cases. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vv_aqytquPchttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=czMb2KwEUbw
I literally posses the knowledge that I will wake up early tomorrow but I somehow cannot pass that knowledge along to whichever part of my brain governs falling asleep. What kind of retard designed this?
>>16886805Trazadone is also weak sauce that easily becomes tolerated.The real secret sleep pill is 50mg quetiapine.
>>16887364Wrong.Its only a matter of fucking up the noise to signal ratio, long term.Its not like a lot of hypnotics where the effect decrease with use. Its more like oversalting your food, and then keep on going to salt it even more because your taste buds has some limitations. But its not as bad as its with spicy food, where once you go over the threshold you can't cry to wasabi peanuts anymore.
>>16887502>>16887465You are both drug addicts, stop parroting your shitty opinions about tolerance.
>>16886301Humans can control any body function to a large degree. You can slow your heart rate to a point you almost die but to my knowledge no one has anhero'd this way and it would likely not be possible. But if you lack the ability to control body functions, like sleep, that's a skills issue on your part due to lack of training. Buddhist monks can slow their heart rates and also increase body temps by will alone. I bet you can't control your heart rate like they do. It's because they practice, you do not. Stop being lazy you fucktard. >>16886753Skills issue as well>>16886791>>16887297anons get it.....
>>16886753I did it with audio alone
Imagine suggesting they should've had their papers approved by their competitors as a requirement to publish.
>>16883879>at times when there were very few notable scientistsThere were plenty of notable scientists, but history chose the winners and you only see them as noteworthy in retrospect.
>>16881787einstein was peer reviewed in a journal he submitted, reviewer pointed out his math was wrong, einstein vowed to never publish to that journal againthis is why einstein gets peer review immunity
>>16881787This is untrue. They WERE peer reviewed, it's just the systematic process for peer review was different in their generations. It wasn't a bunch of busybody makeworkers poring over printouts reproducing results in highly specific circumstances. It was more symposiums and discussions among ACTUAL "peers" to establish the consensus and verification of their hypotheses. They were "peer reviewed" by presenting their ideas, and their peers saying "holy shit, you're right."
>>16881787But Einstein definitely reviewed Poincaré LOL.
>>16881787Yes they.Their contemporaries had every right to read and call bullshit on their work.
