What the fuck were they thinking designing this piece of shit? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3dTvUtXhLo0
>>17033222IDK but I'm happy they did it. NYC desperately needs more AND taller skyscrapers, skyline its stuck since forever
>>17033359agreed, i like any high and flat looking building, they reallyt fit newyork and makes city looks alive, like they are regular in their structure and chaotic as the group of skyscrapers. The same can be seen in the living organisms, you have specimens which look all the same inside a species and species are different. Or organs and body fibres which are built regularly but the whole organism is fucking chaotic, so fun! The cities look to me this way.
>>17033222same guy that designed the burning windows, he's not thinking outside the box.
>>17033222>What the fuck were they thinkinghow to make the most money is the shortest time. Developers form multiple shell companies to pass profits to the developers and shield them from liability which is passed to the suckes who buy the aprtments. About 90% of the most expensive apartments are for money luandering not living and are empty.
>>17033345/threadIt's just a wealth store for the stupid rich.
how do you solve the birth rate crisis question within the current constraints of today's society?
>>17030329Mirror the situation of the baby boom.1. Cheap housing.2. Cheap cost of living.3. Make it harder to acquire contraceptives (requiring prescription for example).4. Men don't lose their shit in a divorce.5. School lasts until age 15 instead of 18-19, so people work earlier and start families earlier.There you go.
>>17030329No budget needed. You only make people aware of spirituality. Otherwise, they will rely on technology and science and they will have no offspring.
i start a facility that breeds or clones humans
>>17030329Artificial wombs, men only. Autocorrect really wanted me to say bombs instead of wombs.
>>17032959I'd vote for you.
The Science of the Mindhttps://youtube.com/shorts/jbXAxn4rX4I
>>17033705There is competition.There are successful civilizations built on Lightframe.As said, you're behind.The more time you spend in places out of this universe, the more actual gains you're making.
If you want a bump to power, you will join my civilization, and add this one to it. You in the same position of power, however you are beginner. No worlds are constructed by you. Nothing real is done by you. I will provide necessary schooling/training to you. You wanna lead? Fine. We need that anyway. I'm just the guide apart from me and Rayquaza are the only ones working at the top at the moment.
>>17033719It's all being done, the best of the best. There's room for leadership(the perfect power structure). I'm offering you a fast-track to the same desired position. There's lots of open slots at the top.
>>17033720There's real people there, being served.
bring back asylums
Nowadays, a doctor can invent that someone have various mental health problems and disease in order to commit that person to a psychiatric hospital and, in doing so, receive payment from the health insurance plan.Unlike physical illnesses, anyone with a medical degree can claim a person has a mental illness, without even proving anything, and have them committed.
>>17033439My father is crazy, and there was nothing that could be done. He abused all of us. He had violent outbursts based on nothing real. He repeatedly accused my mother that she's "scolding him for working" when she called him that the food was on the table. He can't understand even basic stuff correctly, and he keeps doing random "work" around his house. But he has the ability to fake normal smalltalk (nothing he says is real either) so he's supposedly fine, and he managed to convince them that several people around him are crazy, or mentally retarded.
>>17033439>>17033475Se o que vc está dizendo é verdade, vc devia tentar ter um diagnóstico com outro psiquiatra. Eu também jogava um processo por fraude médica
>>17033439>Nowadayslollmao
>>17033475>if I wanted to, Id do it right now, since I have 400mg of morphine at home.>I hadnt been selfharming for a while.>I havent taken antipsychotics in months.You seem like a mentally well-adjusted individual who definitely doesn't deserve to be committed
>>17033487sounds like a family problem.if a family member acts up like that you conk them on the head.if they continue, conk them harder.eventually they will stop.
Anyone watching these contraptions crash ?https://youtu.be/_pEc-lV41LY
why is this even a thing, lifting higher is just motor thrust, it has nothing to do with better ai, you'd think they'd find harder challenges than this, like front running whatever is happening in iran, it's a surprise the govt still hasn't figured this shit out and all they can do is post lifting challenges lmao
>>17032736IIRC that rocket was the largest ever launched in Britain
>>17032038i did. pretty fun.fossil fuel drones sucked ass
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NmvLJCdYDRIGood video by one of the competitors, looking around and talking to folks
Lets go skyweaver!
Congratulations to science for sciencing Arday into yet another science role. This is science. This is the scientific method in action. Oh my god we are so inclusive and scientific right now
>>17033615The irony of your post is forever lost on science is epic bacon brains
>>17033615>christofascistsWhy are you calling your own people "Christfascists"? Theyre pro-BLM/SJW Islamo/Judaic-fascistic Communists.Multiple posts have been 100% opposite in its interpretation of OP's post...this is now a pattern of Cognitive blindness or willful lying.>>17033162>and counter-definitional results (Nutritionists describing toxic foods as good so MDs can prescribe more Rx, same for vaccines).Or in other words, Science is now about a "battle of Psycho-Social hierachy battle of wills".How? Why? Why are """"Scientists"""" unable to discern objective reality?
>>17033623are you really so low IQ you can't tell sockpuppeting samefaggots when you see one?oh nvm i know your schizo ass of course you are.
>>17033629You are a well known pedo sock puppet. You rape children and beat your wife.
>>17033629When sockpuppeting and honest discourse are indistinguishable it doesnt matter.>>17033615>stupid strawmsnIts not a strawman, its a literal description of reality.>>17033610>Fauci was the science (“I *am* the science”)"They're criticizing science, because I represent science.">>17033607>we have 10000 more being promoted and drenched in honors as we speak.When they control the "Broard ceritification" they control who is or is not "a citizen of Rome"...and with that the institution is no longer about "verification".>>17033629>oh nvm i know your schizo ass of course you are.Oh, what was your thesis in Psychology on?...or did you )))forget((( you have no qualifications to discern objective reality in yourself?....just a "battle of willpower"?
What went wrong?
>>17032082>Paleontology maturedYet they still believe in 8 ton monsters that walk on two legs with somehow impossibly muscular ligaments to support their bodyweight lol
>>17033014Do you usually advertise your retardation like this
>>17032009actually the old paleontology joke was "if you want to see a dinosaur just pluck a chicken"it turned you didn't even need the plucking
>>17032009bad investments
>>17032009It must have been the environment because dinosaurs wouldn't think about living in your radiator.
Gravity is real and Einstein is full of shit.It is only analogous to acceleration for point particles in perfectly uniform fields (which are pretty much equivalent to fields that don't exist) - making equivalence principle a circular logic - "if I make my system equivalent then it's equivalent".In any more complex system than the above gradient of the gravitational field can be detected and measured due to the tidal forces it causes.
Daily reminder newton never claimed gravity and didnt want to be associated with it
>>17032491>>17032492So you made a long text that explains how much of a super smart phd you are with an amazing oversight over everything. How only you are smart enough to understand the math, how knowledge should be gatekept from the masses.But in this you make a central error by claiming that lorentz aether fails to describe QFT and get called out. Instead of apologizing or at least walking back partially you cowardly leave.
>>17032491>>17032492Damn, smoked that retard.
>>17033384You know he made a verifiable false claim by saying that lorentz aether fails to describe QFT?
>>17031976>AI Feynmancan he explain magnets?
Infinity + 1 is strictly bigger than infinity. Learn Nonstandard Analysis you dumbasses.
>>17032224If you treat it as an iterative process yeah.If you treat it as a structural graph reduction problem, it's solvable under certain conditions contingent on how you treat "infinity".
>my made up thing is right and your made up thing is wrong
>>17030945>What are the first few digits of pi past the standard part? In any finite base350
>>17030991Okay, the standard part is all the insignificant zeros before the first significant digit. So the first few digits after the standard part are 3, 1 and 4
>>17033190Sure; if the standard part of every number were zero, that would indeed make "nonstandard analysis" quite a bit more descriptively useful lol
There has been steady progress but I think we can do better than thesehttps://youtube.com/watch?v=hHavHQb7ZK0https://youtu.be/mRlbqt5tkh4How do I get into robotics? I can't wait to build my own wife without all the biofoid defects
>>17031589If you have difficulty distinguishing between leather and skin or artificial leather and leather and skin there is something that's gone wrong with you,
>>17029804/diy/ has regular threads on this topic
Turbo vaginas. The real ones pretty good and that really is where the money is. All the dressing around it is just for marketing.
>>17029804you can become a beta tester for their sexbot modelssuits anon well
>>17029804Kek, i love this thing. You should focus on way to make things practical, you know how dangerous it is to put a brain of crysta inside a creature that has the same stability as a newborn? Having better joints and a realistic skin that doesn't need that amount of work would be amazing. Try to make it easier, if you find a way to make dolls easy then more people would work as well. Our problem now is that androids are only made by resourceful people
What is the state of modern physics in determining anything ontic?Like, is there any causation that is fundamentally local at all anymore, or are local descriptions just considered conveniences at this point because it all is encoded along some universal boundary? (Am I on the right track?)Basically I want to understand what is understood in physics nowadays to be basically causal or “ontic”.
>>17032316not at t=0, apparently
>>17032917wt does dat mean
CHSH presents a particularly simple picture of how classical resources trade against Bell violations. results were made showing that more general Bell facets can possess richer measurement-dependence frontiers, with several exactly certified optimal regimes rather than a single linear exchange rate. It is an extension of chsh
>>17032993That either locality is ontic and the universe started out extremely small and then grew, or else the universe started out non-local and then grew apart into disjoint localities, like babels tower
>>17031104>onticdunno, what's the tic rate?
>Oh look after we've found protein ABC123 we've now found protein ABCD1234 that also facilitates/inhibits the immune system which promises new exciting treatments like injection of forthelulzmab. You're not even trying to prevent or cure anything anymore, are you?
>>17032184>>17033232weird as fuck retard rage bait
I cannot wait for the day designer babies become a thing and no one as dumb as you is ever born again
Meanwhile not even one substantive reply.
>>17033495there is no substance to the OP, just an emotional outburst
>>17033562Your IQ high, I can tell. It about 107
Yet no one to this day can explain solubility curves of common salts in water.Why only so many grams of this salt dissolve in water at this temperature. No one knows.Models boil down to "polar likes polar"
>>17030649>nobody wants to make a "model" f>We didnt need to know anyway
>>17030974kek
>>17030027The hard part is not the thermodynamics. The hard part is getting [math]W(E,V,N)[/math] from the microcanonical ensemble, in other words the microstates. This requires you to solve the Schrödinger Equation for the system. A lot of mediocre physicists will tell you QM is "solved", by which they mean they can write down a few differential equations for simple systems like the hydrogen atom and pretend solving that analytically means they have understood all of chemistry. They don't know jack shit. Chemistry is an experimentally dominated field so those won't give you any answers. Theoretical chemists and theoretical molecular physicists are the people you wanna talk to about this. And the biggest problem is that the quantum simulation of many electrons is really god damn hard, and many approximations that people make are factually useless for quantitative results.
To give you an idea:- analytical solutions stop at 2 nuclei and one electron, essentially.- numerical methods that are essentially exact scale super-exponentially and all reasonable approximations still scale polynomially with large exponents and prefactors.- as such, all available computational power we got would at most let us compute a double-digit amount of atoms in human time scales. Bulk water is out of the question.- state of the art methods that scale better like density functional theory are full of parameters fitted against experiments. You could replace most "functionals" in use with well trained neural networks
>>17030027it's a matter of physicists having no idea how to actually apply their own equations and chemists looking at the problem, realizing that the good approach has a numerical cost with a prefactor of (10^23)!^6 and deciding to look at smaller systems instead
Riccati EditionPrevious: >>16940654
>>17029990Why would it be? Vibes are quick way to a failing grade in mathematics.
>>17031608true
>>17031590>complains about ai slop>wants to contribute to ai slopAlso, the answer is whatever gives you more grant.
https://youtu.be/XkY2DOUCWMU?t=502Can someone explain to me his "proof"? You need to prove that AB(C) is the same as A(BC), but he just does his transformations in order C, B, A, instead of doing C, and then AB or BC and then A
>>17033550>but he just does his transformations in order C, B, A, instead of doing C, and then AB or BC and then AYes. That is the point.(AB)C is doing C, and then B and then A.A(BC) is doing C and then B, and then A.In either case you're doing exactly the same trio in exactly the same order. The only difference is which step you associate B with.
What science newspapers do you guys follow? Mainstream newspapers never talk about science, they just talk about "this politician picked his nose today" 24/7
phys.org is ok for general science news
I don't wanna see teetae
I watch Anton
