Why does nobody take Geometric Unity seriously?
>>16831279Because the people who point out flaws in this kike’s theory get excommunicated by his cargo cult. Ironic, considering how he accuses academia of this exact behavior.https://timothynguyen.org/geometric-unity/
he's talking about symptoms. Here's the real deal:>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QfP5BgOz97U
>>16831281fpbp
>>16831279Because it's not a serious theory.
Math is the shape everything takes. Even a nothing - a zero - becomes a one. He’s not wrong that it’s all geometrically united. How could he be?
>>16831279read the "paper"
>>16831279First of all, how dare you?
Scientists should fear this man. Not sure why he fears Witten though.
>>16832017>Not sure why he fears Witten though.Two reasons:1) Witten is very intelligent, like an order of magnitude more intelligent than others in the field of theoretical physics. This is intimidating to many ego driven midwit physicists.2) Witten is pushing a version of quantum gravity that is clearly not leading anywhere, and Witten knows this. This is scary since why would Witten of his intellect purposely push forward such a version of quantum gravity.
It makes no preductions, its just babble.
I'd pay real money for schizos to stop sucking this guy's dick on every board.
>>16832472>I'd pay real money for schizos to stop sucking this guy's dick on every board.It's probably just him posting.
>>16831281>timothynguyenHark, that try-hard?! I remember tearing through a few of his papers a couple years ago. The phrases "idk, maybe it could work" and "it was too complicated but did work" were in them.Maybe he should do some Lagrangians and show people where exactly the issue is l.
>>16832543this is actually quite plausible - rapport and mandlbaur were both massive samefags, wouldn't surprise me if most schizos are.
>>16832472Sean Carrol lost
>he constantly ignores criticism of his theory >>16831281>he does not propose experiments to falsify his theory >he does not want his theory to be peer-reviewed and did not hand it in to a journal >he has connections to Peter Thiel's network and is trying to push some anti-academia political agenda on non-scientific platforms like Joe Rogan or Pierce Morgan Erik Weinstein is not a serious person.
>>16832472same. It's almost as bad as that em-drive bullshit was 10 years ago, or the LK-99 after that, or wolfram schizoid musings
>>16832472You’re gay
>>16831431kek
>>16835158no, he's serious, seriously a piece of shit
>>16831279If you read the paper, it makes you doubt he himself takes it seriously.>i had a proof for this central thing but i lost it or something lol>i'm an entertainer anyway>uuh *lots of handwaving* it's the theory of everything *more handwaving* isn't it obvious?
>>16831279The Observerse is real and if you deny it, you're just pandering to the Distributed Idea Suppression Complex that has been causing poor Dr Eric Weinstein so much grief. He deserves a nobel prize and so does his wife and brother. Him and his wife also wrote an amazing paper on how to properly calculate CPI and GDP. Economists have been doing it wrong all the time but the Weinstein couple have it all figured out.
Unlike other anons in this thread, I'd say it's probably more incompetence than anything. He just spent so much time promoting himself as a serious physicist with a theory of everything so badly he forgot that he hasn't actually made anything of value. Now he's just shat out his current "theory" and tried to forget about it.
>>16840011>incompetenceThe guy certainly knows his differential geometry. It's his Jewishness more than anything. The main character syndrome made him do this for narcissistic self-approval more than anything. Kind of like Einstein spent his late career working on a schizo theory of everything that no one took seriously.
>>16836141wolfram is 10x more credible than this fraud mostly cause he just steals ideas from qualified people and makes them his own
>>16831279not saying his theory is correct but he would be getting a lot more positive attention if he it weren't for the Intellectual Dark Web stuff
>>16840031What kind of positive attention can it get? What problem does geometric unity solve? How is it a theory of everything?
>>16840130It has math symbols in it. Isn't that enough to make a theory of everything
>>16840016What if Einstein's work with Kaluza at IAS is what they are trying to hide?
>>16840031it already got more attention than it deserves *because* of the Intellectual Dark Web stuff. His inane rambling about how Big Physics is keeping him down got a bunch of physicists to actually read his "paper", and it was laughable.
>>16840018Modern day Gauss
Literally "Hey babe, everyone is wrong but im right": The Personlol
>zero papers to his name>wants to play with the big boys
>>16840372When you paper is meant to refute millions of others its supposed to "just show up out of nowhere". and be by someone looking at the whole thing from a radically different perspective.I did that for Biology. Whole field, even into Medical, is foundationally changing from Molecular (mechanistic, Chemistry based Philosophy approach) to Cognitive (intuitive, empathic, pre-chemical (Electro/Magnetic as a Bio-spectrum that can induce chemical changes internally).This started with Jordan Peterson showing how retarded the campus is, then Bret Weinstein who worked in Evolutionary Biology where Richard Dawkins is failing to grasp future results of his choices. Eric just did in Physics and Mathematics, though he does see himself too much of a "Research Scientist". He isnt outside of his Physics/Maths works. Connecting Physics/Maths to Psychology and Political solutions is more than "merely scientific research". No one can say its "outlandish", Corona showed the whole world theyre all retarded sheep who pay money to pass tests for paychecks.
>>16840372most jeet post I have ever seen in my life
Retard here, so consider that when answering my question.>What are the odds that he is correct and indeed the US government is actively hiding physics that would make "warp" travel possible?I have read some interesting things that suggest this could be true, and it has something to do with Einstein/Godel/VonNeumann joint work at the IAS in late 30's and early 40's. (((Allegedly))) it has something to do with Machian interpretations of GR and rotating universe work by Godel. The implications are that it's not anti-gravity, but inertial reduction due to some sort of "shielding effect" that has to do with a rotating universal frame of reference. Is this retarded?
>>16840600Any links you can share?Speaking of FTL, Weinstein says that his Geometric Unity paper can lead to faster than light travel. Can someone explain how it would do that? I saw thishttps://www.youtube.com/shorts/2jBuwnabZ5IGrowing and shrinking rulers will lead to FTL?
>>16840675GU predicts FTL because FTL sells
>>16840675Sort of sounds like altering the relative permeability and permittivity of the vacuum maybe? The way I understand it, FTL is functionally impossible; HOWEVER, what IS possible is altering the impedance of free space to artificially raise or lower the speed of light. You cannot go faster than light, but you can move the goalposts to make the maximum propagation rate of C faster.
>>16831279>arrogant presumptuous douche nozzlemost people would punch this stupid fuck kike in his face until he shuts the fuck up for good..
>>16831279Aether>1 thing is everything>2 seemingly different modes of expression>3, the interplay between the two>All one thing>Collapses into singular simplicity>Expands into infinite complexityIf any of these theories were true they would trend toward simplicity as they went closer to fundamental reality. Trying to reach unification by going further up and out is directionally backwards and can only trend toward greater complexity
https://nitter.net/newstart_2024/status/1975316849207529940I remember Weinstein talking on The Portal about this. I wouldn't rule out that the deep state would be hiding certain areas of physics and engineering for example what if there is an easy way to produce antimatter and hence antimatter warheads? What Weinstein says is bullshit though, he says that physics has stagnated since 1972. What about empirical discovery of the Higgs Boson for example? It's also stupid to call Earth "our womb not our home and we can't stay here". It's probably the only habitable planet we'll ever have.
>>16831431kekmao
>>16843376I'm so goddamn sick of schizos falling back on that bullshit. Imagine how fucking narcissistic someone would have to be to think that their bullshit magic numbers theory is SO brilliant and amazing that the ONLY explanation for everyone else not realizing it is a fucking omnipotent global conspiracy to cover it up; dismissing the work of millions of people and ignoring half a century of history because it doesn't fit your self-important view.
The universe doesn't follow proper mathematical forms.All of these "maverick genius" theories are too focused on mathematical beauty to be worth anyone's time.
>>16843731This. Universe just do what it do. Math is just the best approximation.
>>16843731>>16843879>The universe doesn't follow proper mathematical forms.Then why do we see golden ratios and Fibonacci sequences all over the universe?You are right that the math we use is just a model and it's probably not 100% accurate. They use to think that the sky was a firmament that would hold back lots of water surrounding our world, that was also a model. Now we have a better model. If we're still around 2000 years from now, they may have a much better model and look at our model the same way we looked at the firmament. One thing that I can easily see that astrophysicist have wrong is the Cosmological Principal. The belief that space/time looks the same in every direction. How do they know this when they probably can only observe a fraction of space/time? I can easily see a situation where our light cone is the same in every direction but if you had something like an Alcubierre drive powered spacecraft and venture beyond that, you could see things that are completely different. We might be in the region of space/time that is like the ocean but there could be another part of space/time that is like land. As fish in the deep ocean part of space/time we might never know that there is land. I could easily see a situation where the space/time is like a table with a center and edges and venture beyond the edges and there is no Higgs field and you disintegrate or whatever. Picrel, they fucked by the way
>>16844223Because our brains can only perceive the universe within the frame of limited patterns. We're also better at some forms of pattern recognition than others.
>>16831279face like a ruptured testicle
>>16843879That’s retarded. Even if we cannot fathom it there’s going to be quantification to ANYTHING that exists.
Given the reaction and tone I observe to Eric Weinstein in this thread, I can be quite confident that he is someone that should be respected and listened to, if for no other reason other than to ensure midwits will continue to seethe. I've liked him on the whole for years, I think he is getting better all the time.
>>16844223>How do they know this when they probably can only observe a fraction of space/time?They don't. >We might be in the region of space/time that is like the ocean but there could be another part of space/time that is like land. As fish in the deep ocean part of space/time we might never know that there is land. I could easily see a situation where the space/time is like a table with a center and edges and venture beyond the edges and there is no Higgs field and you disintegrate or whatever.Very cool idea there
>>16831279There's a special class of internet personality that got big during covid>establish a following by being willing to state the basic observation that everything to do with covid was retarded>eventually drop the magnum opus you've been fondling in your pants for two decades >when it doesnt gain traction switch to chimping over every figure in your field I do agree that everyone involved in string theory should be fed into a blender though.
>>16844362>No, no, you don't get it - the fact that everyone points out that he takes it up the ass is exactly why I know he's super-not-gay!
Scientists fear that man
>>16835119Carrol was the one to cast the first shade upon Weinstein. Weinstein then casting back the shade in kind. Carrol then recast the shade directly towards Weinstein who received the shade, absorbed the shade, then re-emitted the shade onto Carrol once again
What are the odds that this statement is accurate? Who would have been with Einstein, Godel, and VonNeumann at the IAS from say 1939 to 1947ish? Maybe Theodore Kaluza?1/2
>>168473822/2>>16847301>SJS - Stimulated
>>16847301>>16847382>*SJC - Stimulated Jewish ScatteringDon't take your contacts out and phone post, kids
>>16847384how dare you cast shade and spursions of the kind that I wouldn't seek to cast on you, but I will now. U r gay
>>16847390until I reflect a time reversed replica of your Jewishness back at you. But seriously, what are the odds that he might actually be correct? It honestly seems more likely than not. The DoD gives money a metric shitload of money to (((fringe))) physics. Take Ulf Leonhardt at the Max Planck Institute, for example. The DoD has given that dude and others like him a shitload of money for a long time. The Chinese government even attempted to recruit him for (((reasons))), despite his research being basically the X-Files for physics and non-linear optics. "Electrical Engineering in General Relativity" is an interesting read for sure.
No more PDFs on /sci?https://arxiv.org/pdf/cond-mat/0607418
>>16847301>Carrol was the one to cast the first shade upon Weinstein. Weinstein then casting back the shade in kind. Carrol then recast the shade directly towards Weinstein who received the shade, absorbed the shade, then re-emitted the shade onto Carrol once againCarroll did the best he could do under the circumstances. This is who he was conversing with:Weinstein - an incredibly crafty Jewish confidence man with connections to Thieland alsoPiers - A retard 10 IQ points lower than RoganThe conversation would go as followsWeinstein: "Edward Witten hypnotized all the physicists into wasting their time with string theoryCarroll: No Eric, this is not trueWeinstein: :"Sean, you as well as I know, you can't get a 4D manifold chiral bundle and resolve Su2 with Su4 bla bla bla bla".Piers: "Hurr Durr I can't explain how the universe was created so God created it"Weinstein is very very crafty. The Decoding the Guru's guys likened him to a slippery squid that will shoot out jets of ink and escape just when you think you have trapped it. He's also an expert at pilpul.Geometric Unity is actually very Talmudic in nature. It's basically numerology. Manipulate 4 to get 14 then manipulate 14 to 128 but look 14-4 is 10 which is the dimensions for string theory then 128 is also another important number in quantum physics etc. One thing I also find interesting is the connection between Weinstein, Epstein, and Thiel. It seems like all the scientists that Epstein was courting are now in Thiel's camp and are pushing the anti-Academia agenda. Weinstein had also said that Thiel had suggested he talk to Epstein back when he was alive which he did. I find this very suspicious, it's as if they don't want science to be conducted by the general public but by people aligned with the (((oligarchy))).Picrel, they fucked.
What's the deal with his eye? I saw this happen a few times when he was arguing with Carroll. It's like he has independent control over each eye much like a lizard.
when did bro get 8 fingers
>>16849053He's like Brendan Gleeson in the Harry Potter.>Mad Eye Jewey
>>16849593Can't unsee.
>>16849053He's just a cross-eyed jew, nothing out of the ordinary.
>>16849053That's how they see in higher dimensions
>>16847772>Picrel, they fucked.Don't think so, iirc he was quite dismissive of her after she's been on his podcast, and basically called her dumb. Probably because this lecherous jew was expecting free sexo for hosting her and didn't get any.
>>16849147OP's pic is ai.
>>16849919To be fair, porn whores are typically pretty dumb, and Riley seems to be particularly dumb even for being one.
>>16849919Ok, well not sure about Riley Reid but I'm pretty sure he fucked Anna >>16844223I guess that makes Anna more slutty than a porn star.>>16849929She's a super retard if she thinks she can scrub her porn star history from the internet lmao
>>16850051I mean that Riley Reid is dumb in a literal sense, like max 80 IQ. Weinstein probably invited her onto the show thinking he'd have some intellectual discussion with her about the merits of porn and humanizing pornstars or whatever, but he found out she's genuinely just dumb. From what I gather she's proud of doing porn and genuinely regrets nothing.Also I doubt even a narcissist like Weinstein would go anywhere near Riley Reid's pussy with the amount of mileage its taken.
One thing that puzzles me is why Penrose even gives the time of day to an obvious charlatan like Weinsteinhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mg93Dm-vYc8That actually seems like an interesting conversation about spinners and is way over my head. I might rewatch it to try to learn more. I feel like Weinstein could be a good physicist if he dropped whatever scam him and Thiel are cooking up.
>>16831279>You will never be a real physicist. You have no Lagrangian, you have no predictions, you have no falsifiable hypothesis. You are a failed algebraist twisted by jewishness and geometry into a crude mockery of nature’s perfection.All the “validation” you get is two-faced and half-hearted. Behind your back postgrads mock you. Your parents are disgusted and ashamed of you, your “friends” laugh at your equation of state behind closed doors.Reviewers are utterly repulsed by you. Thousands of years of evolution have allowed reviewers to sniff out frauds with incredible efficiency. Even mathematicians who “pass” look uncanny and unnatural. Your inability to recover fine structure is a dead giveaway. And even if you manage to get a washed-out string theorist to publish with you, he’ll turn tail and issue a retraction the second he gets a whiff of your absurd gage group stapled to your parameter space.You will never be happy. You wrench out a fake smile every single morning and tell yourself it’s going to be ok, but deep inside you feel the depression creeping up like a weed, ready to crush you under the unbearable weight.Eventually it’ll be too much to bear - you’ll buy a rope, tie a noose, put it around your neck, and plunge into the cold abyss. Your parents will find you, heartbroken but relieved that they no longer have to live with the unbearable shame and disappointment. They’ll bury you with a headstone marked with the definition of your Shiab operator, and every passerby for the rest of eternity will know a pseud is buried there. Your electron will decay and go back into the quantum foam, and all that will remain of your legacy is a flawed extension of Minkowsky spacetime that is unmistakably pointless.This is your fate. This is what you chose. There is no turning back.
>>16847772>>16847301Carroll is out of his depth when it comes to quantum gravity and shouldn't be debating Eric on it, but to be fair, it's also just not his topic of research. The real issue is that none of those people who are well-read on it ever appear on podcasts, especially when it's a debate.When string theorist Joseph Conlon attacked Eric, Eric actually did a decent job at defending himself and GU, and Conlon just stopped responding, see this thread: https://xcancel.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1979651549669560494Eric just presents himself really bizarrely and comments on politics, UFOs, etc. likely as a way to grow an audience of neurotic schizos to attack string theorists with. Say what you will, but he's been incredibly effective at sowing distrust in string theory in the public's mindMeanwhile Woit's 20 years of blogging about String Theory, rigorously and clearly pointing out its issues, has done fuck all. In his latest blog post, Woit is just crying over the 50293th positive pop-sci article about it despite his herculean effort at trying to fight it rationally, in fact, he writes:>It became clear long ago that writing careful explanations of exactly what was wrong with this kind of hype is a waste of time. There’s no point in arguing with the people making up the industry generating this nonsense since they simply don’t care whether what they are writing is true or not. For many years it seemed to me that the effort to try and fight this was still worthwhile, because if unchecked it was going to lead to the intellectual death of the subject of fundamental physical theory, together with massive discrediting of scientific research in general among the public who traditionally held science in high esteem. Unfortunately that fight has now been lost, with the depressing consequences that surround us all.https://www.math.columbia.edu/~woit/wordpress/?p=15348
>>16850482The UFO commentary is one of the only reasons I enjoy listening to him. He's one of the only people that aren't totally retards and think that JUST MAYBE it's the government and not aliens. However, his Ed Witten Derangement Syndrome rears it's ugly head during these discussions because he fixates on his dad and Stony Brook instead of focusing on the actual Department of Energy and DoE affiliated university research. And yes, highly likely (((UFO))) programs are DoE projects and not DoD, but there may be some DoD-ish organizations involved like the Office of Naval Research that are technically under DoD supervision but sent subject to Congressional budgetary oversight because they are a "for profit" enterprise.
>>16831279he didn't kiss the ring and lick the ass that had the power to decide if his shit deserves attention or not. that's how humans dothe only way to break out of that has to be something that absolutely cannot under any circumstance be ignored. if it can be ignored, no matter how important, it will be ignored, purely on the fact that he didn't like the ass that was presented before his facewe are literal chimps, nothing more, nothing less. hairless chimps
>>16850482>Carroll is out of his depth when it comes to quantum gravity and shouldn't be debating Eric on itI don't see that he was debating quantum gravity other than to say that there's a good reason for it to be interesting to some physicists. Carroll's points were>No Ed Witten did not practice mind control to get everyone waste their time on string theory>There's a good reason as to why people found string theory interesting>No, string theory is not taking up every physicist's time. He uses his department as an example where there are 6 physicists and only 1 works on string theory and only half the time>If you have a better theory, do the work to show people that it's interesting instead of whining on Rogan and other places that people aren't spending time on your work of entertainment. >The real issue is that none of those people who are well-read on it ever appear on podcasts, especially when it's a debate.I don't see why this is a concern. If people want to work on string theory, they should work on string theory. If they don't want to discuss their work on podcasts, they shouldn't have to. My understanding is it's a fringe theory and I'll take Carroll's word that not a lot of physicists work on it.>When string theorist Joseph Conlon attacked Eric, Eric actually did a decent job at defending himself and GU, and Conlon just stopped responding, see this thread: https://xcancel.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1979651549669560494To me, this just looks like Eric's brilliant strategy of spitting out a bunch of good sounding technobabble and inundating your opponent with it. He's been very successful with this technique against Mick West. Conlon writes that the GU paper does not adequately address dark matter, Eric then responds that he talked to him about this at Oxford and goes into a long technobabble about fundamental vs emergent chirality which nobody understands but it sounds smart so it must be true. 1/2
>>16850482>Eric just presents himself really bizarrely and comments on politics, UFOs, etc. likely as a way to grow an audience of neurotic schizos to attack string theorists with. Why bother other than for internet monetization? How does this help the field of physics?>Say what you will, but he's been incredibly effective at sowing distrust in string theory in the public's mindMeanwhile Woit's 20 years of blogging about String Theory, rigorously and clearly pointing out its issues, has done fuck all. If Woit has legitimate criticism that aren't being taken into consideration then that should be addressed but not going on Rogan pushing a bogus theory of entertainment.>>16850621>And yes, highly likely (((UFO))) programs are DoE projects and not DoDNot to derail but I would like to know more about this. the DoE has been an organization I've been interested in because it seems clear that they created the "hate site" encyclopedia dramatica. Girlvinyl was a security analyst at the DoE then left and opened encyclopedia dramatica but then decided to close it in a lot of drama and went on to be a VP of a large cybersecurity firm despite her hate site and thot history. Seems suspicious.
>>16850949The DoE has a weird classification structure that is far more stringent than the Department of Defense. There are a bazillion different classification levels related to anything nuclear/nuclear weapons adjacent. DoE glowniggers have to have a TS/SCI and a concurrent DoE L (lower) or Q (higher) clearance granted. From there, you have 10+ different Sigma clearance levels that cover nuclear weapons-related information. If it produces radiation and can be weaponized or facilitate the development of a weapon, it's attached to some level of Sigma clearance. Basically, the DoE is structured in a way to compartmentalize the everliving fuck out of all data related to anything nuclear weapons, and "need to know" is strictly enforced even at the presidential level. The president does probably have some sort of Sigma clearance because there is a specific Sigma classification for knowledge of nuclear strike options, weapons deployment locations, and capabilities, but he would definitely not be granted a Sigma classification that would allow him to view full or even partial scope design specifications or other things like that. Shit like that can't even leave the room, and someone is watching you while you view it. Clinton tried to pry into old AEC/DoE and EG&G archives to attempt to get to the bottom of what was going on at Area 51. He was denied access because he could not demonstrate a valid need to know. The AEC did all kinds of wild shit from the late 40's until the mid 70's, and we only know about a fraction of it. The government can just respond "it's restricted or formerly restricted nuclear data, fuck you" to any FOIA requests and good luck circumventing the Atomic Energy Act or Invention Secrecy Act to pry it out of them.
>>16850971To further add, Men in Black are probably real, except it's not Will Smith, it's a combination of the DIA/Office of Naval Intelligence/Air Force Office of Special Investigations. If I were a betting man, I would say our (((UFO))) program is run primarily by the US Navy jointly with the DoE.
>>16850974Why would the DoE spread UFO conspiracy theories or be involved with area 51? I find this also interesting:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phoenix_LightsI recall you could see a trail of this to the DoD
>>16851040Area 51 is carved out of the Nevada Test Site, which is entirely under the jurisdiction of the DoE/NNSA. EG&G is a DoE contractor that was originally chosen to film nuclear weapons detonations with high speed cameras and wire up the warheads for the bomb tests, probably because they were former MIT alums with Vannevar Bush. As far as the DoE being involved with UFOs, they either are nuclear powered or produce shitloads of gamma radiation as a byproduct if the propulsion mechanism. Either way, it falls squarely under the jurisdiction of the DoE, and what branch of the military works hand in hand with the DoE because they operate 40+ nuclear reactors...?
>>16851040Weinstein unironically hit the nail partially on the head. He thinks that SUNY Stony Brook is the nexus of (((UFOs))), which I'm sure he is partially right. What does Stony Brook have in common with the general point I'm trying to make?? They run Brookhaven National Lab. Guess who also jointly runs the accelerator facilities at Brookhaven with the DoE? The Office of Naval Research. It's more about how he's missing out on all the other NatLab and DoE affiliated university research at places other than Stony Brook. People forget that our national labs aren't run directly by the government, they are managed by big university systems (U of TX, U of CA, SUNY, etc.) and glownigger defense contractors (LockMart, Batelle, Honeywell).
>>16851390I've heard that Stony Brook's OPSEC is almost non-existent though. Area's that are supposed to be secure are left open etc. I think (((Avi Loeb))) was saying the same thing about Stony Brook. I'm somewhat uncomfortable with the Loeb-Weinstein dynamic duo lol
>>16831279Because it's essentially nerdoid word salad.
>>16851595I'm sure that they aren't just leaving secured areas open willy nilly at Brookhaven, anon.
