Why can't we do gene editing on babies? This would eliminate so many diseases that plague humanity. It's also the most likely cure to cancer.
This seems like it'll turn out great, not sure about long-term plans with that population though.
>>16964838Genetic Modification is less like mixing and matching Legos or computer parts and more like fucking around with the binary byte code of a giant spaghetti program without any access to documentation so you have to take notes along the way to figure out what certain code sequences do except whoever wrote the program is a huge fan of reusing code so a small change can spiral out into unintended consequences
>>16963983Dr Chud has had it with ethicsEthics have fallen
>>16963983>This would eliminate so many diseases that plague humanity.We have something much simpler and proven called vaccines. Tons of diseases were eliminated thanks to it.>It's also the most likely cure to cancer.Cancer is hundreds of diseases and some of them can already be cured.
>>16963998They are non fertile GMO stock. Only the parent company can make them. Then they can charge people to be alive and keep American safe and numero uno.
>majority of actuall physicist dont actually believe and its becoming less and less popular every decade in academic circles>pseudointelectuals believe cause it sounds cool and ubdermines traditional western believes so they push it on tv with creates more pseudointelectuals who think their smart for believing it.
>>16966317Everything being fundamentally made of the same stuff is about as "western" as you can get. The ancient Greeks got up to a lot of that shit.But yeah. String theory was always a lightning rod for dorks who prefer elegant math over predictive power.
>>16966325Oh, kinda unrelated, but I really do mean dorks.This has to be one of my favorite images ever. This is our favorite physicists in casual mode.That's Witten there in the middle. He's the guy that gave us M-theory which is the version of string theory everyone recognizes.
>>16966317>majority of actuall physicist dont actually believe and its becoming less and less popular every decade in academic circlesNot really. It was never particularly popular in academic circles. Most physicists don't really know string theory because it's too difficult and not useful to them, and neither believe it nor disbelieve it. In academia it has always been a niche area.>pseudointelectuals believe cause it sounds cool and ubdermines traditional western believes so they push it on tv with creates more pseudointelectuals who think their smart for believing it.Pseudointellectuals like (you) also believe they're smart for thinking string theory is le bad because some faggot like (((Weinstein))) told them so.
>>16964421source of the image seems to behttps://www.doitpoms.ac.uk/tlplib/diffraction/contents.phpso that assumption is correct
>>16964425Oh, well, as you can see the diffraction pattern appears even with a single slit and the double slit experiment just overlaps two out of focus patterns to produce an interference pattern, but it doesn't really say anything.
>>16964438>the diffraction pattern appears even with a single slita diffraction pattern appears
>>16959846yea
>>16964916nay
Belief is scientific. You can experiment with it.Do you believe you have bad memory?Replace the belief with something functional (not fantasy)Don't jump to "I have perfect memory." That won't stick.Use something grounded, like:"My memory improves when I pay attention.""I can remember what I choose to focus on."This aligns with reality, so the mind accepts it.Understand what's really happeningThe belief is not truth, it's conditioning. You've practiced forgetting under a certain narrative. With different practice, the pattern changes. The brain is plastic; it rewires based on use.
>>16966274Ignorance makes you forget who you really are. Right know you have no clue who you are. You believe you're an individual.
>>16966277I am as much an individual as formulating this response requires. In that lies free will. My choices are my own. :)
>bots talking to botsdead board, dead internet
>>16966300Your doing, not mine. :p
>>16966313>or are you not free:3
achievable or not? they just detected another 3 cases a few days ago
>>16965306>roiding for this
>>16965306mandate vaccines then we can talk about eradicating any virus
>>16965331Rinderpest went extinct without any cow getting vaccinated chud
>>16965331also mandate masks and mandate cock cages and mandate big hairy men having sex with meI'm trans btw
Are most tornadoes really EF0s or do most tornadoes just hit cornfields so they don't cause enough damage to be rated higher than EF0
>first quantization was the quantization of observables>second quantization was the quantization of fieldswhat will the 3rd quantization be?
>>16966282The quantization of quantization
>>16966286interesting. elaborate
>>16966287I made it up
>>16966289newton made up his theory or classic mechanics. einstein made up his theory of general relativity. hawking made up his theory of black hole radiation.just because you came up with the idea it doesn't mean it's a bad idea fren. elaborate
Do you ever stop to think about how weird it is to be alive?Like we just wake up in a huge floating rock one day out of nowhere.Too many things need to be aligned for us to be here right now. It seems too improbable.And don't mention the Anthropic principle because saying we only exist in universes that support live, in no way explains the reason why we actually exist or why we exist in this specific universe.
>>16965988Don't care if this is gay, but what sometimes blows my mind, is when I see a flower or something and think how it's just a bunch of chemical processes that through selective pressures optimized its own replication. And how I'm basically the exact same thing
>>16966036That doesn't answer at all the unlikelihood question.The universe is estimated to have like 10^100 years in total.If I assume the average of being alive to be 100 years then the probability that we're experiencing a time where I'm actually alive, and considering closed individualism is true, is naively 10^(-98).
>>16966197that doesn't follow because you assume you are the only event that lives to be 100, there are tonnes of events that last similar time, if you included them all, then the probability plateaus close to one
cosmological constantone chance in 10^601 (put 60 zeros her) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YmOVoIpaPrc
>>16965988There's a process following lawful paths (I'm not going deeper into it than that, pearls before swine and all). That's it. That's the "reason"
YFW black body radiation require a lattice structure so stars have to be more than compressed gas. Physics and especially astrophysics has been fundamentally flawed for a century to the degree that we don't really know what temperature is. Dr. Pierre Marie Robitaille may just be the greatest living scientists. His revelations are going to change everything.Lab tested physics is so back bros!Missing Link Between Quantum & Classical Physics - Dr. Pierre Marie Robitaille, DemystifySci +415https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HmFqt1-O7fwEverything We Know About Temperature is Wrong - Dr. Pierre Marie Robitaille - DemystifySci +416https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hf-sKeeWaeY
>>16965922Thank you ChatGPT
>>16965962Nope. You bitch and whine about nobody listening to you, and then you completely ignore anything you get in response. Are you capable of rational debate? It doesn't seem so.
>>16965930>in empty space the atoms gravitate toward one anotherThey just feel lonely and want friends
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5sazKR1Mi00Lel. He debunks his own claims when it comes to trying to explain limb darkening. If it was actually metallic, the edge of the Sun would be brighter, which it isn't.So he conveniently adjusts his claim to say the top surface is a non-nonconducting solid hydrogen.Oh yes, it definitely has to be solid and metallic, but also not metallic on top.What he doesn't bother to think about is that this suggestion also fails. He also doesn't do any quantize comparisons, because he would quickly see that having a lambertian radiator fails to match the profile observed in limb darkening.And it doubly fails because limb darkening depends on the wavelength of light you observe it in. It is stronger for blue wavelengths, which would not be the case if you had a solid back body lambertian radiation. So his idea doesn't work at even the most basic level. You need radiative transfer to explain limb darkening, which means it has to be gaseous.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Limb_darkening
Interesting. Will follow.Definitely more helpful than /x/tards.
It makes you no money (only 1% of the population care at best) and women don't care for it at all.So why is there an instinct to philosophise?
>>16965780unironically lead poisoning
>>16965809>summon the astrologians of carazhan and the nigromancers of ergimul, tonight we dine with the shadow of spirits and the sin of the immortall god
>>16965915Son*Interesting typo
>>16965780Philosophers were quite wealthy back in the day because the only way to convince anyone about anything was to talk to them. Those Greek guys din't have the time to ponder on nothing during the time when 99.9% of the population was subsistence farmers for nothing.
>>16965780Philosophy is lived even if it is not articulated or examined. Philosophers at the bare minimum are just verbal advocates for some of them.
I apologize if this isn't the right forum to discuss this, but I often come across videos of women lifting weights, and some people say that women have significantly more "upper body strength" than men, and so on. But how different are we really? Thank you.
>>16965725No, foid.Foids are more competitive over ultra long distances than in other athletic fields, largely due to self-healing properties of Estrogen, but they still fall well short of menThe 100 miles World Record is 10h 51m for men and 12h 42m for women for example
>>16965726According to.. you? OkWe could also talk about lower body strength
>>16965728>lower body strengthNo. men have 33% more lower body strength than foids Which might not sound like too much on its own, 1 to 1.33 ratio, but is a colossal gap irl with real forces at play
>>16965725>But in enduranceYeah, women are relentless, aren't they?
>>16965725Only if "she's" a man.
Why did no one tell me the wave vector is actually a one-form? This caused me so much confusion in undergrad
so are -forms just a generalization/rigorization of differentials or is it A interpretation of what they could also be? and why are these things studied in differential geometry and not just regular analysis where you initially encounter AND DEFINE differentials?
>>16963411please understand. they have severe autism. to them a row-vector and a column-vector require different names. one of them is called an n-form, while the other has some retarded name i cannot for the life of me recall. row-vector and column-vector are too self-explanatory and accessible to the public, so they instead introduce idiosyncratic, idiotic verbiage to alienate everyone and feel smart doing it.>insert mathfag screeching about some minutiae of details like how it's ACKSHUALLY a row-vector of differentials!case in point.
>>16963469>t. finite dimensional nigga
>>16960639Potentially; because, the wave vector is used in physics and the one-form is used in differential geometry
>>16963113
This is what happens when try to boil water too quickly
>>16965449you lost nafotranny
>>169654493 sneeds... not le bad... not le good
>>16965498What about 3 Mile Island and Windscale?
this is what happens when capitalist scum compete with equal people
So, is it safe yet?
What's the /sci/ opinion on both the African and Oceanian ghost hominids? I've seen the former being (reasonably) suggested as anything from heidelbergensis to archaic homo sapiens, meanwhile the latter is almost certainly something adjacent to homo erectus. Given that *some* mixing with the former potentially predated even the San split(It's found in all non-africans, and some studies have found it in the Khoisan and Pygmy) I really do wonder what traits it might have given us.
lmao, the retard strikes again
>>16965971Given that modern NOVA1 does come from Africa, it seems that ghost hominids are branches that diverged by leaving regions with strong lead exposure and then got reintegrated when the modern NOVA1 emerged and leap-frogged social coordination.
Is there scientific proof male bisexuality exists? you always hear it's just fags who won't fully come out of the closet that call themselves bisexual
>>16964637the proof is in the poo poohttps://m.youtube.com/watch?v=FgxacX72snA
>>16964637Yeah, ask your dad about it
>>16964652I mean to be fair when I was 12 I assumed all faggots were like thisHowever the sort of faggot who tries to come to Christ and become an ex-faggot only to give up on their struggle and go back to their faggotry clearly contradicts thisNow I have also met faggots who were as OP describesBut humanity is a big bucketThere are probably true bisexuals as well as the fake ones
>>16964637>male bisexualitythere is no such thing as bisexuality
>>16965700Correct, Jesus says there is no male or female, only disciples of Christ, so you can not have bisexuality in a monosexual paradigm, engaging in sex is bad and abstinence is good.
