Can /sci/ help me with a problem. I understand and got correct question 2 but question 3 I would have guessed 50kg. I would have thought that due to the rope being pulled in the same direction as the load it becomes a supporting rope, therefore 300/6 rather than 300/5 to get 50kg of equivalent force to lift the weight. Can anyone help explain why the answer is 60kg?
>>16969865>It depends on the angles of the ropesNegligible when the ropes are sufficiently vertical and the pulleys are further than one wheel diameter away.
>>16977099so what you are saying is, it depends on the angles of the ropes.
>>16969264d and b
>>16978494lmfao.the correct answers are already highlighted, buddy.
>>16978497Those are wrong answers thoughbeit.2. d3. b
According to mainstream scientists. Not even these people (who have lived isolated and inbred for 60,000 years) are "pure". No one is pure. Race isn't allowed to exist. Ever. People's ancestry doesn't cluster "discretely enough" by their standards and never will.
>>16968788>Negroicity
>>16968788Destroyed
>>16968788Kek
>>16968788Lol
>>16969607>i don't understand PCAthat's not a compelling argument.
Biologically speaking, why is homosexuality not considered an abnormality in the world of science? The purpose of a man and a woman is for reproduction. We have special body parts that are made for that, so how is it then for two people of the same gender to be attracted together and not considered an abnormality?? It's so obvious yet the world of science simply ignores it. How is this abnormality accepted without any sort of defiance in the scientific community? Also, what's truly the percentage of people who are homosexuals (including women) only because of something wrong with them physically and not because of social trends?
How gay a species of animal is depends entirely on the animal Giraffes….
>>16960810Faggot.
>>16976924>projection
>>16960894Have you reproduced?
>>16960810It has nothing to do with biology, everything with politics. We have one world government to change the consensus on a dime. Everywhere it was classed as a mental illness until it suddenly was not.
Omg, trips galore.
Then 111.111.111x111.111.111 is really about to blow your mind
>>16976361it already did
>>16976361
>>16975472>>16975472ignoring the fact that this dataset is literally impossible to arise in practice, here are your two sinusoids, phamLet[math]y_1=e,; y_2=\pi,; y_3=e^\pi,; y_4=\pi^e,; y_5=\frac{e}{\pi}.[/math]Then[math]y(x)=a_0 + \sum_{k=1}^{2}\left(A_k\cos\left(\frac{2\pi k x}{5}\right)+B_k\sin\left(\frac{2\pi k x}{5}\right)\right)[/math]with[math]a_0=\frac{1}{5}\sum_{n=1}^{5} y_n[/math]Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>16977844>phamDoes that mean family?>,;Comma semicolon?Oh my word.>y_5 = e/piWhat about the following?y_6 = e*pi
Scientifically speaking, what causes 2 teenage boys to view tranny porn, and for one to want to be the tranny, and the other one to want to fuck trannies? What causes the difference? Is it hormonal?
>>16971200What about a third one who wants to blow a tranny?
>>16971230correct.
hello, tranny here.I never watched tranny porn when I was a teenager. I wanted to be a girl since I was 7, many years before I discovered sexuality at all. I didn't know boys could turn into girls, I didn't know boys could like other boys or girls could like other girls, either.I didn't transition to rebel against society, or my parents, or christianity, or because I have AGP (even though I think there's literally nothing wrong with finding yourself sexy because cis men and cis women find themselves sexy all the time).I transitioned because being a boy was unsatisfying to me.
>>16971200Trannies are largely grouped in those that get off from viewing themselves as women (autogynephiles), and those that were originally more like gay men and more feminine by nature (homosexual transexual).For those into tranny porn i would imagine AGPs represent the ones who want to be the tranny. And bisexual men are the ones who want to fuck the tranny,
>>16977775>>16977790What do you say to this anon, trannykun?
Why do black holes have such strong sexual energy
>>16977938shut up, faggot.
>>16977938Imagine an alien civilization just evolving and popping into existence in sufficiently close proximity to a black hole that they have enough time to develop basic culture, some complexity etc and they generally understand that they're all fucked in the short term and that there was never anything that they could do about it and toward the end they get good enough at physics to see that yep, they're truly fucked.
>>16977938>God is a womanNoFuck off
>>16976308His sacrificed his child to the vax.
>>16978260worse still. Imagine you had a black hole within your spaceship's reach, maybe only a few lightdays away. Wouldn't you go there? I think everybody would want to know what's inside and you'd have people jumping in and killing themselves all the time
Thinking is NOT computation.Computation is capable of many “tasks” that thinking is not.Are there any “tasks” that thinking is capable of that computation is not effectively capable of?Don’t call me a retard, I’m trying to figure something out.
>>16976690What ever dude, like if you don't know basic argument principles. I ain't going to waste my time explaining them to you. either attack the points or not. literal anyone could say something isn't relevant regardless of whether or not it is, it's just the equivalent of saying "nuh uh".
>>16976690>To go beyond this triviality, you'd have to define a new ad hoc "computational model" that describes a class of mathematically analogous systems.i don't see how that goes beyond triviality. why call it "computation" at all if what you really mean is just the thing's actual physical, existence?
>>16976698Because you have a mathematical description with some quantifiable "output" and the "computer" implements processes which produce that "output".
>>16976707but that's pretty much the inverse of computation. instead of the physical state of a computer representing abstract quantities you have abstract quantities representing the physical state of the supposed computer.
>>16974732They can produce training data just fine, it just won't necessarily reflect the real world data they are seeking to make predictions about, so there is not much utility in the data, just like chatbots can hallucinate, its just not useful in the jobs they are trying to make the chatbots do.
How did OOA humans look like? Some people claim they looked like the khoisan people, but how much truth is there?
>>16978282>Some people claim they looked like the khoisan peopleBullshit, OOA humans looked nothing like any of today's humans. 100,000 years ago humans looked more gerontomorphic.
For me, its 6.
>>16977592Yeah
>>16976192>cyclic proof theory
>>16976192Based. P DOES equal NP. We are just too retarded to find the algorithms.
>>16976192https://mystical-metaphysical-number-system.github.io/mmp/docs/Number/Resolution/OuroborosOperatorIts a strange beast, whether its useful or not i think will be how it fares doing r1cs formulations. it came from resolving the logical inconsistency with the negative box math with a balanced trinary structure. This was motivates as modeling the continnum through not the empty set the infinite nothingness . It can climb the natural hierarcy of numbers so two natural numbers can be donuted into a polynumber with a certain domain and range based on the two numbers
>>16976192If there is a p-value crisis then p-values are in crisis as a method also
Are penguins birds?
>>16974790What are African Penguins? Checkmate!
>>16973052Do they have beaks? Then yes.
>>16973057It's wild knowing that the real penguins went extinct and all that are left are imposters with nobody left to call bullshit.
>>16977682Are turtles birds?
>>16973052yes
NNNNNNNNNNNNOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO THE ENTROPY OF AN ISOLATED SYSTEM CAN NEVER GO DOWN BECAUSE...BECAUSE IT JUST HECKIN FLIPPIN FREAKIN CAN'T OK????????????
>>16977564no you can't.
>>16974980Not all infinities contain what you're looking for.
>>16977566Maybe it's like a knot that will only come untangled when it reaches a knot tied the opposite way.
>>16975054except they fucking are laws you fucking retard, maybe stop trying to change the meanings of words if you want to be pedantic??????
Entropy is about typicality. Typical configurations outweigh atypical configurations at an exponential rate as the size of the system increases. In physics this matters because of chaotic systems. Like stirring tea and milk together. Mixed configurations significantly outweigh unmixed configurations. The chance of the tea spontaneously unmixing is astronomical. On a cosmic scale, practically valuable work is necessarily entropy increasing. Negative entropy is a non-renewable resource. You can't extract work from ambient heat.
In the two guards riddle, I don't get how the solution makes sensePlease explain
>>16973047can you rephrase this using cute anime girls
>>16976323Sorry, just a hot jewish girl, no anime.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=grOpvXBmTx8
>>16973047This...this is excellent
>>16973002Commutative property
>>16973002Take a gunShoot 1 through the headAsk the surivior if the other is alive
Falcon 5 - editionprevious >>16975245
where we're going we don't need roads
>roadsthat reminds me... i wonder what spaceways will look like in the future. waterways on earth are full of markers and beacons to aide in navigation. i assume space will end up the same way.
>>16980106They will use SPS, Solar Positioning System so they know exactly where they are and where they are going at all times.
soon
>>16980106Imagine Saturn's rings but paved out of asphalt and connecting every significant body.
Quantum makes my end wet. Also makes me poo.>disregard bitches; study quantum my son. There is nothing more important today. - Feynman
It must have been one of those AI produced Feynamn YouTube quotes
>>16978150No, he actually said that.
