>Exodus Propulsion>https://youtu.be/7nOsj7SEUYk?is=bgsDGDQDoC6oZhJgLegit or not? Ex-NASA engineer discovers electrostatic levitation.
>>17042774An electric train has been propelling itself without propellants since forever, it's not a new thing to push off things with electricity.
>>17042774Replication would be piss-easy and I've been waiting for years for it, why is it taking so long to test a capacitor encased in styrofoam in any other vacuum chamber on the planet?
>>17042873My original hope was make millions and fund fringe science. We got crowdfunding and I feel people can take moral responsibility for their hobbies now, so it is totally fine if you hate me
>>17042987The problem is not funding per se, but the will to test a claim.Even Shawyer had more recognition than this, even though the concept was less viable and arguably had been way less popularized than Aurigema and Buhler.
Why has Heaviside been so forgotten when he was so important? I’m starting to think maybe there is a group of people trying to suppress the ideas of men like him. Perhaps, a (((conspiracy)))?
Sorry, haven’t read the thread so far but wasn’t Heaviside a big pusher of the failed “vortex theory” along with Lord Kelvin and Peter Tait? They did huge damage to physics by pushing a speculative theory of fundamental physics for decades and probably halted its progress for that entire period by dogmatically adhering to a particular vision of fundamental physics. It took a while before outsiders could debunk their theories and come up with the low-hanging fruit that they managed to obscure with physics dogma for a long time.I think the historian Helge Kragh has made a convincing story for why the Vortex Theory community is a direct historical analogy for the String Theory folks of today
>>17039262Heaviside's reformulations of Maxwell equations obscured electromagnetic field momentum, which got rid of vector potential A and scalar potential V. These are things you need if you want to make free space force fields for manipulating matter. You all learned the lorentz force, but that is really just a major simplification of the forces you can impart using em fields. Study up on the Maxwell stress tensor, it sort of opens up em force field technology in a way that you wouldn't have learned in an engineering class.
>>17042981uh, I don’t know what engineers learn in terms of E&M4Engies… but are you claiming that the Maxwell’s equations I learned from Griffiths are wrong? I’m pretty sure they’re right but let me know. picrel
>>17042996Well, thats correct. My bad, we didn't have very much time to cover them, it was at the very end of the semester of my em waves class, and we hardly had any time for them.But what you should take away, is that there is more to force production using em fields than 'lorentz force law'. Research traveling wave MHD forces to find out about that.Your em fields class also probably didn't cover Ponderomotive force and Dielectrophoretic force, which are really cool and worth studying, especially in relation to traveling wave field effects. Maxwell stress tensor gives you a broader understanding of how to make forces with electromagnetism.
>>17043005I think you maybe have a small chance of being legit but I am very highly sceptical right now that you are a pseud. I apologize if i am wrong but electromagnetism discussion on the internet has been forever harmed by people like the “Thunderbolts” idiots who promote the “Electric Universe” and deny all of modern physics since the days of Maxwell. it is really frustrating to me because E&M and Maxwell’s equations are such a beautiful intellectual domain and the basis any physicist needs to master to understand modern Field Theory, but unfortunately any time a discussion comes up on the internet about this field it devolves into arguing about whether or not Tesla was right about his silly scan tower on Long Islandi hope people do get better at classical Maxwell E&M because we really could use better technology from that era like fucking cellphone towers that don’t have dead spots on my way to drive to work. But sadly the Thunderbolts retards make it impossible to actually discuss the topic online
Well?
>>1704297418 jumps seems really high
>>17042974Oooooh, so it looks like everyone is taking it take each frog INDIVIDUALLY counts as a jump. Whereas, I count after BOTH frogs jump.Ok yeah, so everyone is answering 36 cause it's double counting mine. It's not like they can land on each other on an odd number of jumps given the not-my definition. So my answer is basically matching what the others are saying in a sense. I mean, you can change the matrix so now that it isn't 4 dimensional but 7 dimensional, but uh, nah. And again, it ain't like you can ever get an odd number state anyway.>>17042977huh? the others are saying 36 tho
Per the wording of the problem, the second frog always jumps in the same direction as the first, so they never end up on the same pad.Y'all dumbfucks need to learn to read more carefully.
Who the fuck calls a lily pad a water lily leaf? What fucking language was this translated from?
Troll version
I am trying to make a 12v batteryThe ingredients at my disposal are aluminum wire (gauge and purity unknown), copper terminals I salvaged from an outlet (purity unknown), 710ml plastic cups (PET?), salt packets (unsure if iodized or not).I have no background in anything related. Any advice? Tips?
Buy a car battery, they are only like 50 bucks or something.
>>17042904look at this guy: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alessandro_Voltadamn clever
Computer science general/CSG/ #1GO
>>17042857Ok I will do the same here as in /sfg/ just with computer.OMG NEW NVIDIA GRAPHIC CARD WILL LAUNCH IN 2 WEEKS!! HUANG JUST SHARED A FUNNY MEME ON TWITTER!!! THUNDERBIT GOT MAD AT HIM HE HAS HDS. SGI IN 2 YEARS
>>17042861I thought more about https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fCbAafKLqC8not cons00mer slop
>muh science evolves and changes overtimeBut it literally doesn't. The scientific method doesn't change and has never changed
>>17042769>xxxxxx69Nice.
>retard never read kuhn
>>17041923Because there hasn't surfaced anything better, yet.The only standard in science is reproducibility. If you have discovered another method that can produce better result modelling reality, do let us know.
>>17042795>The only standard in science is reproducibility.I can flip coins all day long, frog.How much “data” you need?
>>17042798However much it becomes statistically significant.
I remember in the 2010s the newspapers were full of these news that an experiment to prove whether gravity is actually quantum or just classical was imminent and that it would lead to a nobel prize immediately10 years later and still nothing though? what's the hold up?
>>17042626>Gravity as a force is many orders of magnitude weaker than any of the forces that are studied by particle physicistsPeople say this always but this only holds up for tiny distances. For normal distances gravity is the strongest force.
>>17042613Gravity is possibly an electromagnetic dipole effect
I believe it's a cancelled-out 90-degree verge from the ascent from space.
Gravity is just electromagnetism
>>17042726Yeah magnets
stumbled across https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ijFm6DxNVyI and am now having anxiety. is it likely that a bubble is heading towards us right now or is it that not enough time has passed for the "random" chance to perform enough combinations and we are fine in human time frames.
>>17039301fear the crab cat
>>17039349thiseven if le bubble formed somewhere "nearby" earth, it's overwhelmingly likely it would take millions of years to reach us
>>17041522what if it formed millions of years ago
>>17039409But the pressure asymmetry (lower energy state between two plates) causing the Casimir effect, does not produce cosmic-wide surrogate eschatologies.
>>17039301Why would you have anxiety over something that is completely hypothetical and not proven by any experiment? It's like having anxiety because you think god watches you masturbate and you're afraid of going to hell.
What do you think is more real and possible
>>17042677Vis-à-vis
>>17042684Hitler
>>17042685Schmitler
>>17040864what would a simulation be "simulating"?
>>17040864"god" is just the hope for P = NP but only for the in-group
Pangea, we used to be togetherWhy'd we have to drift apart?Pangea, we used to be togetherWhy'd we have to drift apart?Thread theory: https://youtu.be/3HDb9IjynfoThread theme: https://youtu.be/phGCD-Ia3J0
>>17041422Cartoon characters weren't enough for you sickos?
>>17041422>EXPANDING EARTH THEOREMwelp if material is constantly being captured and pulled into earth then technically its gaining mass but slowly
>>17041422>sslybyjust talking about them on /pol/ the other day... used to chill with those guys back in SGF and go to their shows at Outland. Ha Ha Tonka too. maybe we know each other...https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n39__fWDXxAhttps://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/540674784/#q540687722>expanding earthneutrino powerhttps://www.k-meyl.de/go/Primaerliteratur/earth-expansion-by-neutrinopower-jgg-1000219.pdfhttps://www.meyl.eu/go/indexbe14.html
>>17041428>>17041432watch the friendly fire, fellow sophons
This is OP's head theory. It blows when he inhales weed and then gradually shrinks into small crumbled ball.
Every collider search for the graviton is implicitly a search for evidence that RS1 or RS2 is a literal description of spacetime, not theoretical. If we take this seriously, there is a genuinely dangerous consequence I have never seen addressed.The AdS5 bulk in both models is non-supersymmetric. Non-SUSY AdS vacua are metastable against decay to lower energy AdS vacuum. Nothing in the RS construction protects the bulk constant from this... So... the RS bulk itself is a false vacuum by default, independent of a stabilizing scalar. This gives us two serious issues.>RS2: a blackhole with mass relative to the bulk planck scale rather than the brane is no longer confined to the brane and enters the bulk, seeds nucleation of a low energy bulk-bubble that expands and physically collides with the brane generating a big bang: this is the Gen-Ishibashi-Tanaka model run backwards.>RS1: the exact same blackhole bulk-bubble generation here instead causes the radion to destabilise, collapsing the geometry of the entire bulkIf the graviton is discovered RS becomes literal and we inherit a false vacuum in the higher dimensional space, these then become immediate dangers that the graviton hunting community has ignored because they have never calculated them before. I have done it backwards. RS2 requires 100-1000 TeV for bulk-bubble generation. RS1 only requires 1-10 TeV for radion collapse.
>>17042609I am pretty sure you are making up your argument. You’re fibbing. Chaotic inflation is still a viable theory as far as I know. If you want to disprove this then please provide some links or any sort of sources because you are just stating your bullshit as fact as this point
>>17042610Imagine the smell.
You're going to do this until you die while.. us.. what was the phrase you used.. affirmative action? While we individuals of affirmative action take your position and you only have yourself to blame. Eventually every post here will be logged back to your real identity and you will be a case study in how despite being born into the economic circumstances of the global 2% you still wasted it and lived a life of resentment.
>>17042615Oh God! you got me there . the global surveillance state will kill me for vague antisemitism. you win bro, I support genocide in Gaza now
>>17042383I know where that quote is from but you absolutely do deserve a flogging for making me suffer the pain of reading it.
There are 2^1001 binary colorings of a 7x11x13 matrix. How many have no monochromatic row, column, or hypercolumn?The exact answer fits easily into a 4curry post. Nevertheless, I'm quite sure that no AI jeet will be able to output that answer, because AI can't actually create any new, unpublished math.
>>17042281>>17042289True
>>17042232> because AI can't actually solve one goddamn thing that hasn't already been solvedUm, so this is false. LLM’s have already solved 400+ open math problems within the last year. But even if it were true, it would not mean that LLM’s are useless. It’s simply a matter of time to train them on what they can’t do, and since they think much faster and make connections among larger data sets (such as among dozens of research papers), then in some ways they are clearly superior to humans. You may find an example of something that LLM’s currently can’t do, but how about all the things that you can’t do, but an LLM can?
>>17042534Nice
>>1704213595129658510860868846394595...696 (300 digits)
Well, OP?
What's your grade of intelligence? If you are either completely on the left, or completely on the right, you are an outlier.You should join other atypical people like you here: https://discord.gg/avDYjKmyjfI expect more people on the right side...
>>17040851It's funny that the original phrenological books described people with tall foreheads as incapable of any thought, but they later rewrote it to tell the opposite.
>>17040851mystique from xmen could probably change her skull bones to the best shape in every room
>>17040940>phrenologicalRich dataset of 1.2 million criminals.160k+ faces analyzed for CNN.Convicted pedophiles are most likely to be older, white, overweight men.Our model achieved 69% accuracy in classifying pedophiles from facial features alone.https://www.uncorrelated.xyz/p/pedoaiFacial features impact on power, warmth, honesty, intelligence.Bodily asymmetry affect on health and IQ. Digit ratio impact on aggression.For three traits – extroversion, conscientiousness and openness – the observers’ rapid judgements matched real personality scores significantly more often than chanceComment too long. Click here to view the full text.
I'm functionally retarded compared to AI, close to a room temperature IQ in Kelvin. For a cold room.
>>17041389You can absolutely tell if sonebody is infantile (like Epstein) and other defects, but that tells you little else about their personality, or what crimes they commited. (it's possible that infantile men AMONG CRIMINALS tend to be pedophiles) Healthy face with no specific defects tells you absolutely nothing.
Kek, anyone can make math breakthroughs now. Mathematicians are literally on suicide watch.
so is this how people felt when first calculators appeared?or when computers learned how to solve crosswords? isn't dopamine the end goal and everything else is just details?you can ride, fly, bike, or run to get from A to B.
>>17041267Banana
>>17039636>i solved
>>17040362Can we get the LLMs to help?Claude, determine a foolproof way to make a woman orgasm through PIV with a 4.5 inch penis. You should do a breakthrough.
>>17041267353597371077... (111 digits)
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21988123
>>17038545interesting but seems very limited in scope. It makes perfect sense to anyone that has dealt with curvelinear coordinates that no coordinate system is usefully global but this seems to be bogged down by a lot of specificity for such a general claim
>>17039288Appreciate the Insight
Dead Frog
>>17042084Keep crying you fucking nonce. $0.00
I assure you my Ip is secure. Cry Now; Laugh Later.
