Made 1 (one) derivation that is a step from a solution from one of this jewish bois textbooks problems and i am proud of it.
>>16578622Anol'd
>>16572211>>16576717>>16576749Threadly Reminder Ghislaine Maxwell's dad, Robert ran a university text book publishing company that focused on STEM.This is why standard model cultists will never create a unified theory.
>>16584161Exist better books for every subject or group of books with more modern development outside Mechanics, but most modern physics will never touch kinematics or more advance fluid dynamics but learn a lot more quantum mechanics, quantum field theories and solid state or condensed matter.
>>16585342hello sir
>>16572211Landau did nothing useful in his life.Nothing i use in my life or in an industry that affects my life was developed by Lev Landau.What use anyone has for order parameter?
Anyone else feel like technology and social media and social media has made them dumber over the years?
>>16584834>If you were smart you wouldn't have ever started using social media>uses social media to say that
>>16584823Smart people optimize for trained monkeys and that's why they're stupid.
>>16584831>t. tiktok infinite scrooller
>>16584823Problems started when facebook timeline dissapeared and was replaced by phones with selfie cameras. Back then profilepictures was of people not phones in mirror with human siluete.
>>16584823Only if you consume the Truman show propaganda everyday. If you can escape that and learn to spot it, then you become smarter.
Talk about your shitty graduate school experiences ITT.
....I never graduated high school. I am NEET since 15 and have learned everything from the interwebz.
>>16577472middle and right image are the same thing
If I didn't go to grad school I might not have gotten into fighting games, so it was overall positive
I wanna go to grad school but don’t want anyone to tell me what to do. I just wanna study higher level topics in a structured environment with a physical building and staff dedicated to it. Is this achievable natty?
>>16584168tfw
Chinese astronauts aboard the Tiangong space station have achieved an unprecedented milestone: artificial photosynthesis in space. As part of the Shenzhou-19 mission, they have managed to transform carbon dioxide and water into oxygen and rocket fuel components, using only solar energy.https://www.drivingeco.com/en/China-revolutionizes-space-exploration-artificial-photosynthesis-rocket-fuel/https://www.livescience.com/space/space-exploration/chinese-astronauts-make-rocket-fuel-and-oxygen-in-space-using-1st-of-its-kind-artificial-photosynthesis
>>16585622Is the ability to do this in space remarkable or something that could be done but no one bothered with doing because doing it in space doesn't offer many advantages at this time?
>>16585626It's not very remarkable since it's largely pointless. You can do this in your garage with a chemistry set and a solar panel I guess. The reason why it doesn't make sense is because you still have to haul up what ever you plan to make the fuel out off so you may as well haul up the fuel. Besides it's not like electrolysis in space or what ever is a new thing. It's scientifically interesting but OP is unfortunately a spambot so best ignored.
>>16585663It's photosynthesis not electrolysis.CO2 -> O2notH2O -> O2But please tell me how you can achieve photosynthesis in your garage with a chemistry set and a solar panel.
>>16585739It's not photosynthesis, it's electrolysis because it's using electricity from the panels to break up water and combine it with carbon dioxide, not using plants that use sunlight (which has been done as well). Also electrolysis by itself already makes rocket fuel.>But please tell me how you can achieve photosynthesis in your garage with a chemistry set and a solar panel.The same way they do it in space, hook up some water and co2 with electricity and catalyst and out comes hydrocarbons and oxygen.
>>16585621Not as amazing as they make it sound. It's a long way from actually being used in practical application. We did it on Earth decades ago and it's still not economical.
that we see with naked eye are in our own galaxy? If true, why is this never taught in our normie science classes?
>>16584871They left it there.If you go to the moon and find it... is it yours?Can USA demand it back?
>>16585318The point is it easily weighs over 1000 lbs and yet we are supposed to believe it was considered 'essential' part of the project.... the same project where every OUNCE of weight had to be accounted / calculated for in order for it be a success. Of all the glaring red flags it was a hoax, this is the biggest one.
>>16585847The lunar rover weighed 450 lbs
>>16585851and? do you have an actual retort ?Weight margins were extremely tight: The Apollo spacecraft had a limited payload capacity, and EVERY OUNCE counted. Engineers had to carefully balance the weight of the spacecraft, crew, fuel, and cargo.DETAILED WEIGHT BUDGETS were created: NASA engineers developed detailed weight budgets for each component of the spacecraft, including the structure, propulsion, life support, and communication systems.EVERY item was carefully weighed and accounted for: From the astronauts' spacesuits to the food they ate, EVERY item was weighed and accounted for to ensure that the spacecraft remained within its weight limits.>and yet that ridiculously NOT ESSENTIAL heavy af 450lbs jeep chassis went along for the ride because... 'reasons'
>>16579024>If true, why is this never taught in our normie science classes?It is, you just weren't paying attention.
So Bell's inequalities disprove the hidden variables interpretations of quantum mechanics?How many interpretations are possible now? Is Many Worlds still unproven to be false?
>>16585098I said random variables not hidden variables. You are the one misunderstanding. You never stated why a hidden variable theory must contain those random variables.>>16585102Wrong. Bell's theorem is about hidden variable theories, not quantum mechanics.>>16585106The energy in each world is given a weight. What is conserved in the mwi is the weighted energy of all the parallel universes.
>>16585162Everyone is retarded except for you. What breakthroughs have you been working on in the field?
>>16584776You know how testing of a hypothesis works, right? It's never proven true.
>>16585802>Which is why standard model physicists haven't done shit for science since the 70s.I realize you can't answer this question so personally attacking me is your only option but you're just so boring and predictable it's sad.
>>16585993I'm not interested in that debate. I'm interested in what you are doing. What your expertise is, and what your sector of the field is, and what you've been doing in it. Feel free to be candid.
So, I recently watched a video about converting platinum into chloroplatinic Acid. I was just wondering whether or not this is something that chemists actually do within their work usually? It wasn't semiconductor grade but who would be a willing buyer to this kind of stuff? He was apparently able to sell it for around 6,000 USD so it seemed like a pretty nice deal. (Even if the Platinum itself was around 1,000 USD) Should I do this as a nice side-gig? (I mean, I could do the research myself to figure out if there are any buyers out there, I just want to know if anyone has experience with this sort of practice and how popular it is in the first place).
>>16585861>sell it for 6000 USDSell how much and in what units? Does the price increase 6 fold?>popsci youtuberYou have been fooled. This title is 99% clickbait.The prices of today exist because the value of everything is in equilibrium. If what you said was true then I guarantee that some company with better logistics than one person would have done this already and reduced the prices to 1000 USD each. Which probably already happened.
Considering antipsychotics are practically proven to kill a significant amount of neurons, and probably cause cognitive decay, how are they still legal to prescribe for trivial reversible mental issues? Let's not mention the Tardative dyskinesia it frequently causes (irreversible)
Nice, Any proof for that?
>>16585422Oi vey, that is antisemitic!
it makes the subject more agreeable to his surroundings improving capital creation, thus it is good
>>16585422>WhyBecause the people who control the industry aren't in the market for cures.. they are in the market for profit, and they make profit by creating dependents.This is a very simple thing to understand.
Because we are ruled by psychopaths.
>lmao of course wireless technology is totally safe! it's non-ionizing, that means it's fine! me? i keep my 5g iphone 20 max pro next to my balls 24/7! i need to be wired to the internet 24/7! i live in the 21st century pal!the non-thermal effects seem more concerning to me, a self described autist who won't be convinced otherwise. the unnatural qualities of how this type of radiation behaves is what i'm more concerned about, since it doesn't replicate any type of natural exposure to other sources of radiation. it's used as a form of communication which is why it's modulated to pulse and change rapidly within fractions of an instance, almost constantly 24/7. a bit like trying to use a light bulb to communicate where you flicker the light up and down in rapid succession. that type of light exposure would obviously be unnatural and being in that kind of man made environment would probably be sub-optimal and stress the body. even if you were blind and couldn't see the light, there are still photo sensors in the skin. likewise, cells use electrical signaling for function and the constant exposure to the man made pulsating radiation emitted from phones, bluetooth devices, towers, routers, radios, etc can't be good for you in the long term. i've read about how it can potentially affect things like ion channels and such, personally more concerned about something like this since my own central nervous system has had complications over the last few years and i can see the difference dropping these devices has made just by switching to ethernet. not to mention my balls are now hyper active in a way i've never experienced before in my life.i expect to get roasted here by a bunch of stem fag coomers with a screen addiction. dont give a fuck desu, stick with your low t internet devices fren.
>>16585792>to do researchNTA but you know full well that controlled experiments are not allowed. Take two cities: leave one as is and in the other city prohibit light and sound pollution from any technology after sunset such that everyone can see the milky way and hear a pin drop at night. Next measure stress levels or any marker of human wellbeing. It's common sense that there will be significant differences but it will never be allowed. So your call for studies is dishonest and you know it.
>>16585810That is not the type of study being referenced. I was asking for the evidence that anon looked at regarding conductivity of non-ionizing EHF wavelength radiation in the skull creating dangerous 'hot spots'.
>>16585630>TRUST THE SCIENCEYou dunning krugers are simply remarkable.
>>16585792Wireless safety research isn't funded. The current cellphone safety regulations are based on 1990s research.
>>16585997Not only not funded. Silenced, because network is what controls media.
Are we going to need nanobots in order to cure aging?
>>16584662Fart in my mouf
>>16584631I'm not a Christian. Try again babe.
>>16584693did you just deny your worship of Christ to win a 4chan argument? that's a no no anon
>>16584603That is how to get cancer. Better would be to become a single giant cell but with a human intellect, then there can be no rogue cells.
>>16584603Gotu-Kola
Waterpiks have permanent bacterial colonisation despite thorough cleaning.>Neither using the device exclusively with a mouth-rinse nor any cleaning procedures prevented bacterial colonisation within the device and failed to disinfect the device — especially regarding S. mutans. Further, exchanging the used nozzle to a brand-new one did not prevent the risk of cross-contamination, i.e. bacteria from the device were also transmitted via the water-jet of a brand-new nozzle.https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00784-021-04167-1to this day, mechanical flossing using the c-method is still superior
>>16585479>Waterpiks have permanent bacterial colonisationMouths have permanent bacterial colonisation. I you alone use your own waterpick, you risk transmitting your own bacterial strain too yourself (ie. nothing)
>>16585479I am not surprised, and thank you for the info.
>>16585479Pik is Dutch for penis.
>>16585550My oral health has greatly improved over the past few years of water flossing, and I haven't developed any cavities either. I think that I'd rather water floss and spit out some s. mutans water than have rotting food between my teeth (imagine that bacteria). In any case, tradition floss has its own shortcomings: unable to remove smaller particles, often has a toxic coating (https://hsph.harvard.edu/news/dental-floss-harmful-chemicals/), etc.
>>16585550>Sucrose is the only sugar that bacteria can use to form this sticky polysaccharide.I'm not a candy obsessed Amerifat so this has no relevance for me.
Hello so first of all, my measured IQ is 127.I went on an interview today and there was this problem: You have 7 letters, AAABBCD, how many unique codes can you create?I had combinatorics in HS and I even passed statistics in uni. I also passed calculus I and II in uni. Why do these problems still give me a tough time? This should be easy for me.Anyone also struggling with something more elementary they should have known a long time ago?
>>16585760To make it more complete7*6*5*4/2!*3*2*1/3!D C B B A A A7*6*10*1D C B A
>>16585765Yea. Shits rough out there. 4chan is the only safe space left
>>16585783Not even 4chan is safe, but there's fight here.
>>16585773Me gusta
>>16585765But you do admit that jews are smarter than you?
>be fresh master of psychology>before finishing my studies managed to get admitted to a prestigious psychoanalysis school >also got a letter of recommendation from one of the leading psychologists in my country>can't get a jobI'm an unemployed loser now. Just go to law or medicine or engineering. psychology is a trap
>>16585613>anything that offers working models of the world counts as a scienceYou can not repeat psychological experiments. They offer insights but not to the degree of pure empiricism or logic.
>>16585613>anything that offers working models of the world counts as a science. Any areas of psychology that have been tested and match observations are science.Dumb fuck.
>>16585430that's psychiatrists not psychologists
>>16585218True psychology is Catholic. If you forget the effects of sin you're just coping.
>>16585707I guess I'll have to consider looking for jobs outside of psychology>>16585752>You can not repeat psychological experiments.you have no idea what you are talking about
Years ago I had been told about a particle accelerator that was out in the middle of nowhere, either in the USA or somewhere else, and it was a government ran program that started around the early 2000s. The project is likely where billions or trillions of missing tax dollars went. This program however has no connection to the superconducting super collider project, and was created in secrecy. The accelerator is specifically said to be a synchrotron, and runs on its own reactors for power. The synchrotron is said to be under a mountain, likely in Alaska, or Nevada. Why would they build an accelerator in secret, and what particles are they trying to create? How could a synchrotron be used for anything military related when realistically it can’t mass produce anti-matter or be used as a reactor? Do you believe that what I am saying could be true? Also keep a look out for a post I will make regarding strange black tar.
>>16583536It can mass produce anti-matter.
>>16583536The glow in the dark coating on my wristwatch can produce anti-matter. It is just small and disappears very quickly.
>>16583536Positrons
I updated the Sun in June of last year
What makes it so prevalent amongst naturally formed organizational structures? Is it proof of divine ordering?
>>16585532white people want the world's population to be 80% white and 20% other and in 1900 they almost succeeded. It was around 70%