Why haven't we achieved the Alcubierre drive yet?
>>16777757i dont know
I have the plans right here on my desk. All they need is their green stamp of approval, and guess what...I am about to go take a shit and not do it.
>>16778715I can give you the green stamp if you finance me. Send the money to my paypal account thanks
>>16777757Because drinking and driving is dangerous. Some people have already achieved the alco-beer drive but they got DUIs. Others experienced fatal accidents.
>>16777757>whey haven't we achieved scifi_conceptrequires fantasy materials?
I am fucked phd in physics, need a postdoc urgently. What is the best way to get one in northern Europe or China? I am in the biggest town in the south hemisphere, been stolen by lousy supervisors all my way up to the PhD, I have two papers, one of them from my master was stolen by a postdoc, I am the second author. I am in the field of DFT and Molecular dynamicsHelp me out, I don't want to go to the financial system.
>>16778552>private sectorNot very specific, is it?
>>16778639roll with whatever is available
>>16778639Get a job
>>16778551https://drive.google.com/file/d/1MSYc_9BKC-LcRGWQ_iMvqLOi-el4lzxP/view?usp=drivesdkWould you like to coauthor with me? The work is already done. I just can’t get it published because I’m outside the institutions.
>>167786391. Quant2. Tech (Data Science or ML)3. Engineering - RD in High Tech4. Climate tech5. Consulting
I've been reproducing the same voices/thoughts in my head whenever I hear a certain song. It's the same words. Is this because of how it sounds or because of something that happened while it was being produced or reproduced for the first time? I made that song.
>>16778174None of these. Rather, you require medication.
>>16778174Mk Ultra-ed
>>16778174You programmed your own brain to act like this. Congratulation, you made yourself retarded.
>>16778174This is how brains work and how LLMs now work. It's literally as profane as word1, f(word1), f(f(word1)), ....That's why kids learn stuff by nursery rhymes
It's said that one of the first things that was done with a digital computer was computing the values of the zeroes of the zeta function, and that today it's known that the first gorrilion zeroes lie EXACTLY on the line.My question is, how can they "compute" something like that. They don't say that the zeroes lie arbitrarily close to the line, they say "exactly on the line". How is this possible, wouldn't you need a proof for something like that?
>>16778580Your thread will slide into the abyss.I will still be here, with your uncertain certainty.
>>16775047I wish someone actually answered this.
>>16778910Be the change you want to see, Anon.
>>16778910By multiplying the Zeta function with the correct factors, you get the Xi function. The Xi function has the same zeros within the critical strip, but unlike the Zeta function it is purely real on the critical line. This means that you can find zeros on the line just by looking for sign changes of the Xi function.To confirm that you haven't missed any zeros (either on or to the side of the critical line) you can use the argument principle and integrate in a box-shaped contour. The result will be the number of zeros within the box (an integer).Neither of these steps needs an exact evaluation of the Zeta function, you can use a combination of ball arithmetic and approximations with provable error bounds to confirm the sign changes and calculate the integral.Of course, in truth the algorithms are a lot more advanced and efficient than this simple outline.
>>16779041Ok but this just seems like a proof of the Riemann Hypothesis? So they can count how many zero are in a given region and then prove they are all on the line? Why can't you generalize this to the entire strip?
Me, a non scientist, just figured out the solution to quantum mechanical spooky action and retrocausality.The idea that you can for example toss a coin, freeze time and calculate heads or tails based on momentum and other variables is only possible because a coin toss is not a singular entity. It is a thing composed of many things, each giving you more information. Or if you send out 2 shoes in 2 boxes upon opening one you know that the shoe for the other foot was in the other box all the time while being sent. Because you have info about the manufacturing process etc.An electron in superposition has no other available info. It's like trying to establish a causality and predict an outcome WITH ZERO knowledge and context about anything.It comes down to relying on the simplest and oldest method to establish knowledge. Looking at what electron 1 actually is doing to know what's up with electron 2.I feel like science today lost all common sense and is like witchcraft as in turning everything upside down with descriptions which arrive at the same conclusion as what feels natural but using inside out definitions like"A wave of possibility which only manifests into a position after observing"NO! Your knowledge manifests into certainty when you look. I'm thankful for every reply explain why this isn't true and I'm retarded, because right now it seems to me like scientist are just a bunch of mentally ill people.
>>16776367I'm on a pseud roll here so here me outWhat if we can use this knowledge by choosing to observe some entangled bodies and choosing not to observe others in order to cause different patterns on the relating other body?We would just have to figure out which bodies are entangled or create them
>>16776367So this would imply that time remains the same but locality changes. So maybe instead of bending time, entanglement bends space?
This has to be the solution, it makes perfect sense in my mind. Was this figured out already? I feel like I deserve a Nobel prize
>>16776389Wait I meant locality remains the same but time changes. This is confusing
>>16774525I bet that sounded smarter in your head.
These are covariant basis vectors.They are arranged in a row matrix.Their indexes are in the lower position.So remember that.Co. Row. Low.
>>16775863So is over the counter physics.
>>16775850[]4 ->4 etxzy
>>16775850nice
>>16775851Contra was a video game where a vertically standing person shot people. Contra. Vertical. Remember..
>>16778746Also in that game you jump up.Contra vertical up.
this shit can fly
I hope this makes it clearer, the document is missing the sound section, day 1 before they kill me :D
>>16778457>no math
I have this, though it's so disgustingly basic that I doubt its veracity. It's supposed to be the calculation of ionization of internal gases. I asked a mathematician to do it.I need to fix it and I don't know how, I only know how to design it.
Many physicists "an heroed" when this was first revealed. It can't not be an simulation.
>>16774101>can someone redpill me on this? i don't get why people freak out about this experimentBecause woowoo hucksters, pseudoscience, etc., treat quantum physics like magic. To them "observation changes the outcome" means "OMG IT KNOWS HOLY SHIT EBIN XD" when really "observation" to anyone educated means photons have to bounce off said particles to reflect back to a censor so by observing the thing you inherently are interacting with it. But if you keep it vague enough like a fraud or an idiot then it just seems like the photons are aware someone looked at them and fucked with people consciously. It's honestly fucking embarrassing.
>>16778190>when really "observation" to anyone educated means photons have to bounce off said particles to reflect back to a censor so by observing the thing you inherently are interacting with it.https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0209123v2>For instance, even now, the introduction of the reduction of the state vector is sometimes “explained” by invoking the “unavoidable perturbations that the measurement apparatus brings to the measured system” - see for instance the traditional discussion of the Heisenberg microscope which still appears in textbooks! But, precisely, the EPR-Bell argument shows us that this is only a cheap explanation: in fact, the quantum description of a particle can be modified without any mechanical perturbation acting on it, provided the particle in question was previously correlated with another particle. So, a trivial effect such as a classical recoil effect in a photon-electron collision cannot be the real explanation of the nature of the wave packet reduction!
>>16778136Soory but i just trust the reports. People have done it with electrons, said it worked, and i believe them
>>16778599this so much this. I TRUST THE SCIENCE!
>>16774239Because a photon isn't one thing, it's a mix of two. An energy trapped in a wave. And measuring is nothing but blasting it with another photon, which removes the wave shell from it, and you end up with only energy.
If I have a high iq does that mean my opinions aren't retarded?
>>16776605It means you're good at recognizing patterns and processing information. Unfortunately the ability to recognize elaborate patterns can also lead to finding false patterns where none exist, it's pretty well documented. It's more accurate to say you're capable of advanced retardation.
>>16776605Nobody cares about your opinion either way.
What is one of your arguments against the bible and have you read it?
>>16776605There is no proof that this YoungHoon tard has an iq above 90.
>>16776605is that asian chris langan
Solar energy seems like a thing only poor, third world countries use for energy.Why is that?
>>16778081Your continued insistence in singling out the solar and silicon industries and refusal to examine other industries points directly to your closed mind and hypocrisy.You are worse than an LLM.You are a parrot.
Western engineers hate every energy production method that doesn't involve boiling water.Prove me wrong.
>>16778354Tea Built The Empire
>>16773792Why is it always political figures on one side and scientists on the other side? It's backwards how scientists are painted as corrupt establishment shills... by politicians and literal shills.
>>16777508>Solar works well at small scale in certain areas, e.g. a town of <=1000 people in AustraliaFriend of mine installed 15kW solar on his roof in a more than one million city at 53°North. Covers all his energy needs (incl. his Tesla) from April til October (and would be working without any other battery when we have a fair concept like virtual battery or so). Costs of an kWh (is there a imperial metric for?) over here is around 0.40€ he earns 0,02 for producing.
Are there any other geofags here watching Ruri Rocks?
This is what a geologist looks like
emptying my rocks
>>16774487sweet jesus...can I get some halite from that shake?
>>16747745nice
>>16778226Imari is a dork, and that's a good thing.
Is the pattern on the moon actually this much of an accurate representation of the continents?Can someone help me understand how we go from picture 3 to 4 and 5?
>>16776412Maybe "Atlantis" was buried on the moon?
>>16776412Hitler missed home and made them terraform the Moon.
>>16776951damn, if only we had thought to take a picture of the moon before 1945
>>167784781902
how is that meant to work when the sun is on the other side of the planet at night and there's clouds?is the ocean reflective OP? would the land cast shadows that far upways OP? what i think is wrong about these depictions of earth is the land is green but the land would be different browns and greys from nature and sand and colored on the equator and has more smaller grey patches where theirs colonies so they could definitely improve on the way they draw islands I think
Can things receding from each other faster than 1c exchange information?
>>16777948>Steady state is the specific hypothesis that expansion is offset by matter creation.Shakey, shakey.
>>16777956>>Not in an expanding universe.>Your point is moot. We are in a steadystate snowglobeNope. Steady state cosmology is also expanding. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steady-state_model
>>16777960>snowglobe is biggeningLight is slowing, growing old, cooling off, that's all. Needs more shakey.
>>16777948Steady state and eternally expanding are 100% compatible
>>16778109I didn't say it wasn't. The problem is that galaxies are observed to evolve with redshift, which is incompatible with steady state.
How scientific is tabula rasa as an ideological cornerstone in sociology? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O06u2Ct3XcI
>>16705163They hated him because he spoke the truth.
>>16732619How is he a piece of shit for stating an obvious fact? Please be specific
>>16778421>>16777380The guy was like>"bro just trust me"And thought everyone worshipped authority. He also had pretty scummy and shitty opinions in the past for years until people got tired of him just spouting his opinions like it was fact.
>>16778494Be specific or be quiet.
>>16778605>Be specific Too many cases to count. The guy basically thinks every opinion should have the same weight and impact as his original work ages ago like a twitter grifter.
Where did he go?
>>16764880"Unknown archaic", literally apes. We know for a fact, that "Monkey Business" is a common among junglefolk the world over. Hence, some of our more exotic afflictions as of late, such as AIDS and "Monkey Pox".Even the Romans mistook gorillas for "hairy women".
>>16766802The old "Africa" equals black/sub-saharan lie again. Yes, there are "Africans", like Elon Musk and Charlize Theron that have "surprisingly high" amounts of Neanderthal admixture, but the locals do not.
>>16773544>but possibly a distinct far-eastern Neanderthal relative whose cold adaptations allowed them an easier time adapting to the cold that is also often present at high altitudes.Yeti: Confirmed?!
While Neanderthal DNA is present in populations across Eurasia and Oceania, recent studies indicate that Indians have the highest variation in Neanderthal DNA, with segments representing about 50% of the Neanderthal genome, more than any other non-African population studied. This means that while many populations carry Neanderthal DNA, the diverse Indian population harbors a greater diversity of those ancestral segments. Key Details High Variation in India: Studies show that a smaller sample of Indian genomes contained Neanderthal ancestry segments that represented half of the Neanderthal genome, a higher proportion than found in other non-African populations. Global Distribution:Neanderthal DNA is most prevalent in people of non-African origin, with higher percentages generally found in populations from Australia, Oceania, Asia, and Europe. Historical Context:The increase in Neanderthal DNA in certain regions is a result of interbreeding between Homo sapiens and Neanderthals, which occurred after early humans migrated out of Africa. Why India is Striking:The high variation in Indian genomes was an unexpected finding, highlighting the complex history of human migration and interbreeding with archaic human groups like Neanderthals
>>16778563>take out those studies>reevaluate as DNA *unique* to neanderthals>contrast with unique variations across homo sapiens sapiens>discover your "species" suddenly disappears
