Isn't this bad? The Europeans are accelerating and they are soon going to leave us behind.The Miura rocket will be much more powerful than anythink Musk has when it's finished, we are risking losing our position as the space superpower bros
>>17019444dogshit bait thread, try it on /g/ /biz/ and /pol/ after the 3 days ban you'll take for making it here
why does the universe have 3 dimensions?>inb4 it has 4 dimensionswhy does the universe have 4 dimensions?>inb4 it has 11 dimensionswhy does the universe have 11 dimensions?
>>17019282why does the universe care about preserving stable gravitational dynamics?>>17019285I think he means orbits of planets around stars don't work in 2D or other dimensions, I think I heard about that before
>>17019268Looks like it was a good fuck
>>17019268The fact that it could have however many dimensions just shows there doesn't need to be a reason for however many we have. It's like rolling a pair of dice and asking why you rolled a 9.
>>170192683 dimensions is where all the interesting stuff happens, mathematically speaking. Like for instance the Poincare conjecture in dimensions 4+ is significantly easier to prove than in 3.
>>17019285that's only true in the environnement we know because when we move one item close to another it looks like there is what we call "2" separate items, but if the concept of moving would not exist or if moving 2 items next to another made 10 appear because of how chemistry and physics were made, then our axiom of 1+1=2 and maths as we know it would be wrong from our point of view, we would have been accustomed to other kinds of logic
Dark matter is not real and there's not strong evidence found that is real after decades of experiments.Is as real as jehova and allah.
>>17019322>>17017427The problem is the lack of effort put into the hypothesis, something vague is untestable.>It's obviously nothing but a diffraction effect, if you would be so broad minded to use a common term.Firstly, the poster doesn't specify what he means by "diffraction effect". So the hypothesis isn't even defined.And nor does he he attempt any physical calculation to show that such an effect could explain dark matter. You say people should just go and make some plots for you, which could mean anything. No detail.But you haven't said what this model actually predicts. "A correlation" can mean anything. Why should people take your hypothesis seriously, when it isn't even defined?How can you falsify a model when you have not calculated what it predicts? You can't. And there is nothing scientific about declaring something is "obviously X", and then refusing to expand or give any justification.
>>17019336For you
>>17019336By 'diffraction effect', I'm assuming anon meant some kind of dispersive or interference effect caused by light passing through or by other massive objects (that 'somehow' exactly replicates the effect of their being more matter). At least that seems to be the gist of what they're implying. By correlation, I just mean a clear trend in the data that could indicate a causal connection (ex. estimated missing mass is proportional to number of foreground objects squared or something). If there were some correlation between the two measurements, it might indicate there is more going on.But, to be clear - I fully expect that if anon put this data together they would see absolutely nothing; just a bunch of randomly distributed data points. I've heard of no observations that could support their idea that the effects attributed to dark matter are some kind of 'diffraction effect' and this seems like one of those obvious things someone would have tested and reported already if there was anything to report.
>what if our model is... le wrong? heh. I bet you never thought of this before, huh?Why do retards online think they are being revolutionary by babbling the most basic shit ever? No shit our model might be wrong, this possibility was already explored by thousand of scientists decades before you even heard about the topic
>>17019345This isn't even true though, the dark matter theory is only posited through interactions with masses. It already has a residue. Plus model divergence is already purely circular demand for something that is out of bounds.>i have a novel plasma model which invalidate your models of the universe>but then how does it correlate with divergence characteristics according to those same models
>Emily Lin ’26 used X-ray fluorescence (XRF) to analyze the chemical makeup of glazes
>>17018954More social science trash masquerading as real science.
>>17018954sounds interesting, would definitely help with researching artifacts nondestructively. Do you have any results?
I don't know who that is.
>>17018954Okay, and?
>>17018954Id glaze her with something fluorescent for her to analyze, if you catch my drift
/sqt/ - simple questions thread (aka /qtddtot/)Previous thread: >>16893204>what is /sqt/ for?Basic questions regarding maths and science. Also homework.>where do I go for advice?>>>/sci/scg or >>>/adv/>where do I go for other questions and requests?>>>/wsr/ >>>/g/sqt >>>/diy/sqt etc.>how do I post math symbols (Latex)?rentry.org/sci-latex-v1>a plain google search didn't return anything, is there anything else I should try before asking the question here?scholar.google.com>where can I search for proofs?proofwiki.org>where can I look up if the question has already been asked here?warosu.org/scieientei.xyz/sci>how do I optimize an image losslessly?Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>17016986I have one. If the double slit interference is an optical phenomenon where light waves pass through two closely spaced slits and overlap, creating an alternating pattern of bright and dark bands (fringes) on a screen. What would happen to the bands if you sent a single photon through, then waited some time (Like a day) before firing another one through. Would the inference band show signs of slight deformation to one area, if the proton restarts its first position?
If an electron's position is very well defined, why does this cause its kinetic energy to rise?
Are there any developments on the Riemann Hypothesis lately?
>>17017235Why is it well defined in the first place? Is there perhaps something keeping it there...
Anons I got a Dover print of Emily Riehl's undergrad book to supplement another text. Is it worth digging into?
Hello, what do y'all think about the "A Gödelian Ontological Argument Improved" by Alexander R. Pruss>"http://alexanderpruss.com/papers/GoedelianArgument2.htm"
>>17019208You felt compelled to react because you know I'm talking about you.
>>17019219You don't know what logic is.
>>17019222You felt compelled to react because you know I'm talking about you.
>>17019223You can keep repeating this to yourself but it won't make it true. It's clear that you don't know what logic is and that you're a presuppositionalist (i.e. a mega retard)
>>17019163You didn't even read the second paragraph.
unrelated image, sorry /sci/, i couldnt be bothered.
>oh my god i formatted it wrong>oh well
Moon far side
>>16950529.
>>16950507>they want to build a human station therejust, why?also, was all of the mars stuff just bullshit?
sigh
>>17016353>just, why?Lunar research for a start, the far side terrain is very differnt from the near side.Also, it is useful for super sensitive radio telescopes since it avoids the radio noise from Earth.>also, was all of the mars stuff just bullshit?Nope.
SIGH
Consciousness firstIndividuals learned to alter their state of consciousness and directly perceive that reality consists of countless parallel versions existing simultaneously.Scientific validationTheir science eventually developed instruments and theories that agreed with these experiences. Their physics concluded that consciousness is fundamental, not matter, and that physical reality is a projection or translation of consciousness.Practical applicationOnce this became accepted, they learned that what we call 'movement through time' is actually shifting from one parallel reality to another billions of times per second. Every decision, belief, and emotional state determines which version of reality you experience next.Technological integrationTheir spacecraft and other technologies are described as operating by interacting with consciousness and these parallel realities rather than by conventional propulsion alone.https://youtube.com/shorts/2yWPS3EiR4U
>>17017695>Individuals learned to alter their state of consciousness and directly perceive that reality consists of countless parallel versions existing simultaneously.Everything everywhere every-when exists all at once? How do I become a different me? Pls I’m desperate
>>17019294Not by looking at this world with your physical eyes thinking it is reality.
Why do so many shitentists support cultural enrichment, if they are so smart?
>>17018918>calling people midwits while posting AI screencapsThis site is so beyond dead
>>17018938Good goy
>>17018918Less than one-half of non-hispanic whites were Christian in 2025.
>>17019235fewer. you could say less than 1/2 of “whiteness,” if you were a gay dork, but it’s fewer than 1/2 of whites.
>>17001941They're not smart and don't know what second order effects are and are also to dumb to see first order effects
I wanna take a crack at the Boolean Satisfiability Problem, and to do so I need examples of long Boolean equations with like 50 variables so I can test my dumb little theorems. Gimme some equations yo.t. overconfident programmer
>>17019081SAT solvers are routinely benchmarked against each other with many complex equations. You could try taking a crack at those. You should look into the DIMACS SAT format and benchmarks.
Lightframe Thread.Mind is an extended self(what is brain activity? Brain mirroring the body including itself- which results in mind(the passive recognition of local environment)). Mind is a full-self extension in brain-space. The format of this bodily-enviromental extension, is like trees and gunge.Mind is not exclusively space in sense data, nor is it consciousness. It's what the brain and body does together, and not what the brain and body is. You may note a brain-space, local chaos, of subliminal indecisiveness.Consciousness is seated in brain and body, it is akin to mind. The common view of our consciousness, a body down below, seemingly jacked on as an extension, is strange beauty regarding this topic.You can use mind by selecting the difference between self and the environment.The next step is Lightframe.
>>17018596With hair, you have a home and a outwarding. Try start a mind now, by using a home and a outwarding(practically autonomous-run-command).
>>17018627>>17018627Create/place objective (in-hair).Select parts for running (out-hair).This means I won the challenge. I was first to create a mind.
Oi.You made a mind yet?
I'm studying the pen shape of the Adams Apple, and how it feels intrinsically, any philosophical implications, and how to operate using it.
I would like to introduce the term ‘sate’, sate-hood being the normal/easiest way to create mind(body-matter (x)+ brain-space(where x is exactly how they’re combined)), what we are sated-in.I think our sate-hood(if we are the same sate-hood), is to do with hair.Hair is the closest limb-collection to the brain, it is also a mark of sovereignty. Hair being a multiplex of tails/pens.I managed to create a mind via selecting ‘home’, and corresponding with an ‘out’. This is a hair-psyche(the link from one end to the other).If you want to create a mind, the simplest way is to comprehend your sate-hood.
July 3rd of this year was 7-3-20267+3 = 2+0+2+6What should we call the dates in a year that add up to the sum of the digits of the year?Is there a name for this?
>>17009990Imagine a world like that. An eternal constant, if patterned.
>>17009990i think you have a dick fungus anon.
>>17016457Why? Would that make me think this way?
>>17016457???
>>17009990Arithmetic Dates might be a good name. I was trying to see if Geometric Dates could exist (in the future; in the past is trivial). The best I have so far is that the 17th of May is a day, and days have 24 hours. 17*5*24=2040. So in the year 2040, the 17th of may doesn't really satisfy being a geometric date. But maybe The 2nd of January would be better, 2 * 1 * 20=40. Or the 24th of may, 2048: 2*4^5=2048. Hmm, something of a curio indeed... In... Sneed.
Whenever something is marketed as "consensus" by monkoloids, it eventually turns out to be a lie so this is an extremely strong hint already that the big gangbang never happened.There are other problems as well.https://www.quantamagazine.org/astrophysicists-puzzle-over-webbs-new-universe-20260702/Tldr they're reducing science to "let's run 100,000 simulations and chose the model that we like most until it gets invalidated by new data" now.
>>17018701>so this is an extremely strong hint already that the big gangbang never happenedBut what it did do was force Physicists to construct the universe via an "order of operation" which wouldnt be logical to deduce without.
>>17018705>.com/watch?v=cUR4up6EBLA&ra=mI literally said "This better not be "Real fake news"...and it was.
>>17018701>Whenever something is marketed as "consensus" by monkoloids, it eventually turns out to be a lieI don't think this trend us as common as you think it is.
>>17018701>big gangbangnice
>>17018701yea it's a lie spread by Big Big Bang
https://www.spacex.com/launches/starship-flight-13>The thirteenth flight test of Starship is preparing to launch Thursday, July 16. The 90-minute launch window will open at 5:45 p.m. CT.Official streamhttps://x.com/SpaceX/status/2077785645645209727https://x.com/i/broadcasts/1MKgNNXAZdmxLUnofficial streams NSFhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vYpQwwf1XNwEveryday Astronauthttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2r31rEkUUaALaunch Padhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A2ijEJLPYuMAvid Spacehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7R_8Jw342aA
>>17018615What is the obsession with cryofuels, like how is it so hard to build a shartship that runs on udmh/nto
>>17018623I was about to fall aleep. I was sure i wouldn't make it to Ship splashdown without falling asleep. Maybe Starship detected it and aborted the launch so I can watch the full mission.
>>17018246Can Harold Sonny White stop fucking around by getting sued by perpetual motion machine deboonkers and deliver a functional Alcubierre drive concept instead?
>>17018703What is he doing nowadays?
>>17018951getting sued by perpetual motion machine deboonkers and playing behind closed doors with the investors that have recently granted him 12M to develop a ZPE cheat chip (microsparc - from his company called Casimir inc.)
