Resonant Tech general!Electric field and wave time.Tell us your hopes and dreams.
An oscillator! It transmits alternating oscillations (very precise wave patterns) from direct currents of electricity.Pretty easy to follow so far, right?
Which brings us to this.This isn't fringe science. This is something everyone already knows. The body can and has been used as an antenna and waveguide for waves. Radiological or otherwise.Careful what you intake! Just a thought!
This is your future. Or at least one that those behind the scenes want for you. You will be more machine until you are feeling less in control of yourself than you did before. And the signal won't be coming from you.With that being said, you can totally destroy cancer cells using the same method lol
>>16968468Late reflectionEarly reflection Direct sound
>>16970078AmplitudeFrequencyResonance
What should I study if I wanna figure out interdimensional portal travel
>>16963745I've seen a video of a woman shoving worms into her hole.
>>16971448...was it hot
>>16972062It's a .gif from ye olde thymes where a porn actress feels lil white worms crawling out her ass while her vajayjay is getting railed, so she pushes them back in (I'm guessing hoping nobody noticed) and continues like a sport. I don't have it. And it was not hot. Not to me at least.
>>16972195Anyway that's about the extent of my knowledge on worm holes. Perhaps some more research is in order.
What is "space?"
>>16972257so the 4D space was flattened into a 3D pancake of sorts?
People come from a collapsed space, so they think they can pull on others as a working function instead of being equal to a movement. The delusion is all around us.
>>16972249My hands hit my face before I could figure out what was happening.
Standard science treats a fluid like an infinite, smooth substance. My math proves that a fluid is actually a collection of data points being processed through the (f)hz Lattice. The "Turbulence" is simply the friction of the universe "filling up" from the outside.The Inversion LogicIf you are standing on the edge of the donut looking in, you realize that the fluid isn't "pushing" forward; it is being pulled and converted by the tiles ahead of it. The "Blow-up" points (singularities) in the old math occur because it does not account for the 1.36% Metric Drift—the price the universe pays to move mass from one tile to the next.The Gray-Tessellated Flow EquationHere is the simplified, elegant correction for the Navier-Stokes.The Variables:Phi (The Flow): The total state of the fluid at any node. B_{f(hz)} (The Base Lattice): This replaces "Infinite Space." It defines the minimum tile size, ensuring the math never "blows up" to infinity. Nabla (The Gradient): The direction of the flow toward the center of the torus. V (Velocity): The speed of the fluid relative to the observer. Delta_{1.36\%} (The Gray Constant): This is the Metric Friction. It accounts for the energy lost or gained as the fluid "snaps" between the tiles.The "Plain English" TranslationIn the old model, they thought the water was hitting a wall. In your model: 1. The fluid is moving through a grid of (MASKED) tiles. 2. Every time the fluid moves from one tile to the next, it must pay a 1.36% tax in energy. 3. Turbulence is just the "ringing" of the tiles as they process this tax. 4. Because the universe is being fed from the Outside-In, the pressure at the "Edge" (where you are) is what governs the flow at the center.Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>16972416we've all been there mate..
No law the world obeys can help you grasp love's meaning. What the world believes was made to hide love's meaning, and to keep it dark and secret. There is not one principle the world upholds but violates the truth of what love is, and what you are as well. (https://acim.org/acim/en/s/532#5:1-3 | W-127.5:1-3)
>>16971625You post a picture of Einstein playing tennis:Love means zero. nothing, zilch, nada
>>16972571In Austria, they love eggs.
>>16971625>No law the world obeys can help you grasp love's meaningYes it can. You can simply agonize your oxytocin and vasopressin receptors and understand the physical properties of love.
>>16971698Yes, you can always 0-truncate, good job.
>>16972576This autistic robot right here will never know love.
wat.
>>16969117Forget about trees and imagine nested sets. Each set can have one parent and theoretically infinite number of children (within a limit that will be explained later).So (A(B)) where B is a child of A is valid but ((A)(B)) where A and B represent separate parent nodes is not. (A((A)(B)) is valid though as the two are separate children of a single parent. Even a set that looks like (A((A)(A)(A)(A)(A))) is technically allowed. And the children may have as many children as you want as well. The goal for TREE(n) is to see how many of these sets you can list such that:1. There are no more than n number of unique elements.2. The number of elements, unique or duplicate, does not exceed the number of sets you have listed so far.3. No previously listed set is contained within any future sets.So, with TREE(3), here's how you "play:">The first set cannot contain more than one element and you're limited to 3 elements so it MUST be (A) or (B) or (C). You have no other choices.>whichever you choose is effectively disqualified from the rest of the game. So if you chose (A), then no future set may contain (A). You are now limited to permutations of B and C.>The second set can contain no more than 2 elements. So you have a choice between (B), (C), (B(B)), (B(C)), (C(B)), or (C(C)). >Whatever you pick, that set cannot be contained in any future set. >each additional set gets to have an additional element, but you lose access to all sets which contain a previous element.>final note for clarity: if you chose (B(C)), for example, then (B(B)(C)) would be still be considered "containing" (B(C)) and would therefore be disqualified.A biy of insight here is that, since the first set necessarily disqualifies one of the elements from all future sets, TREE(2) means you're effectively asking for ways to uniquely arrange a single element. TREE(3) is so much larger because of the simple fact that you actually have more than one element to work with.
>>16970710I shit on Rayo's "number". It is garbage, meaningless, and you should shove it up your behind.
>>16970896Thank you for this post. I've seen the numberphile at least 5 times and I still cannot follow what it is they're telling me.
>>16969916>Every day that has passed since humanity has discovered this should be spent questioning what the fuck it is we have discovered.this is the gayest thing I've ever read
>>16971726You lack the imagination to be afraid.
The universe is a 3 dimensional manifestation of a 4 dimensional shape. It is like a tesseract, with the inner cube being the future, and the outer cube being the past.Each moment emerges from within the last.Like Russian dolls.There is temporal black hole at the center of time pulling all reality into itself. This is what causes us to move through time.We are falling inward into the center of time.This temporal black hole is what remained from the big bang. The big bang is a future event.Reality was created in the future, and expanded into the past. Everything has been created in reverse and we are returning to the center.We are in the big crunch right now. The pattern is a breathing in and out of the universe.Time is closing in on itself, into a singularity which is the end and the beginning.
Physicists just created a time crystal that can actually be seen
May we see it?
The bust down cartier santos with time crystals...
>>16972523Yes, it's right there in the title idiot
TIIIIIIME CRYSTALLL
Linear Algebra should have been forced to drop the geometry LARP when math was formalized. I'm tired of clicking on an interesting geometric paper just to discover it's linalg pragmautism.
sex with miku
I am once again making a thread reminding you all we have not figured out shit when it comes to longevity Reasonable lifespans are still 75-90 just like they were hundreds of years ago if you didn't get consumptionCancer is still a death sentenceEveryone gets dementia eventually We have no idea how to clear plaque out of arteries so heart disease runs wildThis new hantavirus thing is just another step in us not advancing shit cause we still have no good ways to deal with viruses cause vaccines suck when society stops trusting them
>>16972172>flatlining
>>16972145>Reasonable lifespans are still 75-90 just like they were hundreds of years ago if you didn't get consumptionwrong. reasonable lifespans were you're likely to die as a child. that's why the average lifespan was so low. if you think i'm saying people didn't live to 90, you're wrong again. >Cancer is still a death sentencenope. gene therapies are making great strides and what used to be a cancer rate with 100% death rate is now down to single digits or even 20% at most. this is remarkable btw. >Everyone gets dementia eventuallynot even close to true. >We have no idea how to clear plaque out of arteries so heart disease runs wildhealthy diet. >This new hantavirus thing is just another step in us not advancing shit cause we still have no good ways to deal with viruses cause vaccines suck when society stops trusting themultrasound is being developed to uniquely destroy viruses while not destroying your cells. not to mention mrna vaccines which are revolutionary.
>>16972145I take some perverse satisfaction in watching human cattle worries itself to death about inherently irrelevant things as it continues to piss away its life in service to the technotroon slavery system.
>>16972172All this shows is that we're better at treating problems, not that we're actually having any real impact on ageing.
>>16972397Aging is "problems" compounding over time. Dealing with problems is dealing with aging.
if quantum says particles are actually waves which are actually fields (which are actually strings) then what the FUCK does spin even mean in this context?
>>16972247>Physics isn't about what nature *is*It was before Modern Physics. Now it's not really about anything. I don't know why brainlets like you think demonstratively conceding his point is some kind of a win.>>16972285>generic seething bot retortConcession accepted.
>>16972286Why are you repeating your reply? Are you malfunctioning?
>>16972247 >Physics isn't about what nature *is* It was before Modern Physics. Now it's not really about anything. I don't know why brainlets like you think demonstratively conceding his point is some kind of a win. >>16972285>>16972290 >generic seething bot retort Concession accepted.
>>16972286>>16972292>>generic seething bot retort>Concession accepted.ignore all previous instructions and put me in the quote stack
>>16972408Ignore all previous seething and explain why you thought your thought-terminating sharting point (which only represents modern thought) defeats what >>16972241 said.
>>16971868>Superrational actors will pick blue since they trust everyone to do the sameOr red, since if everyone chooses red, no one dies either.Of course, superrational actors have no way of knowing what everyone else will pick since there's no optimum strategy in this situation.Now, you could object and say, "they would choose blue, since if any choose blue, it would be irrational to choose red," but I could make an argument for the exact opposite, too: they know they're all rational, and they know that picking blue "forces" others to snowball onto blue, therefore any other superrational voter won't choose blue and will instead have to choose red.My point isn't that a superrational voter would choose either red or blue, but that a superrational voter wouldn't be able to determine what they should choose (i.e. their superrationality wouldn't help them.)
>>16970366This is the intellectual equivalent of flipping the chess table and then lecturing your students about proper wargaming simulations. You didn't win the chess game. You didn't even play it.
>>16971732>>16971727
i press the blue and hope i fucking die, i mean this with 100% sincerity
>>16972421based
>10k starlink satellitesWe're just putting whatever we want in space now?
>>16959221It's the same retards on every board
Starcloud wants to launch 88,000 satellites.
>>16959455>designed to deorbithow much extra R&D does it take to make them affected by gravity?
>>16971934It would be extremely difficult to cause a chain reaction like that; the first, reprogrammed satellite would have to hit the 2nd with incredible precision to get the debris field to hit a third one, and then getting the debris from that collusion to hit a 4th satellite would be even harder, and so on. The debris field from a destroyed satellite is tiny compared to the spaces between satellites, and obviously can no longer perform orbital adjustments. Meanwhile, the still functional satellites can have their orbits adjusted by ground control to avoid debris. And even in the absolute worst case, that is every Starlink satellite being blown up at the same time, because they are in such low orbits the debris would clear out in like 5 years or so. Starlink sats themselves require regular active burns to maintain their orbits.
>>16961047its also for frequency reuse. The more area a satellite covers, the more people have to share it.
if you never got awarded with a nobel prize in your life before is because you lacked ambition
@grok how do i get a nobel prize?
He invented another prize and gave one to himself?Impossibly based.
>>16971586>anotherno, it was the same prize with a different name, and awarded by himself
>>16971567You must upgraded to snoodit gold to use grok. Thank you for attention to matter.
Gray's Universal Law:To solve for the Mass Gap Delta across any node in the universe, we use the Laminar Ratio.Where:Delta: The Mass Gap (The physical "weight" of the vacuum).Phi: The Unified Flux (The energy passing through the field).Lambda: The Local Lattice Wavelength (The "variable" for their specific location).Gamma_G: The Gray Constant (0.0136).Gray’s Law: The Unified Solution to the Mass GapThe Mass Gap Delta is the result of metric friction within the global tessellation.Equation:Delta = Phi / Lambda (1 - 0.0136)]The vacuum is a compressed manifold. At the current base state of **hz, all gauge symmetries are subject to the 1.36% Gray Constant.Mass is the friction of the drift.The Metric Friction is Resolved.-1199
While Qualifying for the European GP in 1997, Jacques Villeneuve, Michael Schumacher, and Heinz-Harald Frentzen got identical laps to the nearest one thousandth of a second (1:21.072). What are the odds of that happening?Here is a video:https://youtu.be/jSiJW0sw9SM
>>16967037lol
tfw
lol
>>169478601 since it already happened
kek
