we don't understand baryogenesis
A Chthonian planet is the remnant of a gas giant which gets to close to a star and has its atmosphere blasted away, leaving behind only the rock and metal core. Being as close to the sun as it is, plus the fact that Mercury has a very large and very dense metal core would seem to support the hypothesis that Mercury could be a Chthonian planet.Much of the now missing atmosphere that Mercury may have once had in the distant past might have been scooped up by Venus and might also explain why the atmosphere of that planet is so dense.
>>16905453fuck diversity hiring. I almost missed out on getting into a very prestigious course because they to meet gender quotas. God I hate this gay earth.
>>16912373>YORP effect accounts for the lack of Vulcanoids while the Sun, Mercury, and Venus account for the rest being gone. The area is too small and anything too small either orbital decays into the Sun or collides with each other and then gets YORPed.Maybe so. I think we can all agree that Mercury's atmosphere definitely got "YORPed". Whether it ever actually was a gas giant or something less, it most definitely would have some amount of atmosphere today if its orbit was further from the sun. I don't think its even a question if Mercury had some amount of atmosphere in the distant past. Its only a matter of how much are we talking about? >Beside, how would Mercury have craters and formations that seem to be 3-4 billion years old?Having never sent even so much as a robotic lander there yet, we know very little about even the surface geology. Yes, it was impacted with comets and so on. That's abundantly evident. But this process is ongoing. I don't think we yet have the data to conclude these craters are billions of years old. They might be. Being able to date them might seal this theory one way or the other.>Why would Mercury not have a magnetic field like every other gas giant? This hypothesis just doesn't add up.Mercury does have a powerful magnetic field from its large molten core similar to Earth's magnetic field. The even more powerful magnetic fields of gas giants is thought to be generated by the swirling vortexes of compressed gases. Needless to say, a Chthonian planet would lose these compressed liquid gases when it loses its entire atmosphere. As the atmosphere is blasted away by the sun, the atmospheric pressure gradually weakens, and eventually the gases that are compressed into a liquid revert to just regular gases, then they get blasted away too.If you insist the theory of Mercury once being a gas giant is too implausible, might I suggest a more modest possibility that Mercury might have instead been a so-called "Mini-Neptune"?
>>16905358All planets are remnants of gas giants, and before that they were "hot Jupiters" and before that they were stars.plasma -> gas -> liquid -> solid
>Is Mercury a K’tan planet?/tg/ pls go
>>16905358Unlike known exoplanet candidates for this classification, which orbit extremely close to their stars, Mercury is not close enough to the Sun for its entire atmosphere to have been stripped in that specific manner.
No dark matter particles, no Λ, no singularities. Just geometry. Who wants to do the math?tl;dr: 5D manifold with skew/non-orthogonal embedding instead of compact Kaluza-Klein. Everything falls out: Dark Matter as gravitational shadow from offset brane, Dark Energy as entropic pressure gradient from standing wave, quantum stuff as phase brushes.Quick hierarchy:- D1–D3: normal space- D4: time/entropy arrow- D5: phase/orientation (charge = p5, antiparticles = inverse phase)- D6: embedding plane for 90°-ish intersections between 5D sheets- D1–D6 = many-worlds block- D7+ = hypertemporal line through universesStart with 5D Einstein-Hilbert:S = ∫ d5x √(-g(5)) R(5)Decompose metric with non-orthogonal terms (key difference from standard KK):g_AB = [g_μν + κ2φ2 A_μ A_ν κφ2 A_μ] [κφ2 A_ν φ2 ]Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
1) There's a fucking built in TeX editor. Put some effort into formatting your math instead of fucking spamming unformatted LLM output. That's the least you can do.2) This is literally nothing. This falls into the category of "not even wrong".3) My head hurts.
I despise AIniggers so much. They have ruined my favorite board.
>>16917997It's literally just jeet newfriends with too much free time on their hands
?
>>16910425You put the magnets in the rear axle and make it spin with a sequence of electromagnets powered by batteries. The front axle spinning generates power to recharge the batteries, supplemented by rooftop solar and hood scoop wind turbine for additional horsepower.
>>16910425Because it's red. You need to paint it green.Green is stronger.
Someone failed their laws of physics test.
>>16910425Both magnets are pulling each other with same force so nothing happens. You need to make the magnet in front of the car stronger so it pulls the small magnet harder
>>16912056>>16915689you paint it red if you want it to move away from you, and blue if you want it to move towards you
can this be mathematically debunked?
>>16911117yes. i is not an integer. QED.
>>16917247What does I stand for if not integer?
>>16911165There are no imaginary ordinals.
>>16911117the imaginary, and real unit are not orthogonal in [ math ]$\mathbb{C}$[ /math ], so Pythagorean theorem is not applicable.
>>16914515legit I don't know why they don't ban the dudehe's been doing this for a long time and he's been reported for sure many timesit's some weird free pass he gets here idkmakes no sense to me
Is this pattern meaningful? Where do the diagonals come from?
>>16917847>Where do the diagonals come from?it's from the way the dots are arranged
>>16917847>he doesn't know that prime number factorization has already been solved by NSA and all cryptography has been crackedlol, lmao even
>>16917847look up prime wheels
do prime numbers have applications to complex analysis?otherwise I don't give a fuck about'em
>>16917896yes and you would know if you ever did so much as a wikipedia deep dive. The zeta function is neither hard to stumble upon nor obscure.
>Take into to proofs course >Supposed to be "higher mathematics" >Just high school algebra with semantic autism So when exactly am I supposed to get filtered?
>>16915954>taking proofs obtained via set theory seriously and considering them meaningful in any wayI feel sorry for you.
"intro to proofs" is not an actual subject that you study, it's just extra scaffolding so normie retards like you can understand actual baby tier math
>>16915954>overconfident "gifted kid" makes excuses to give up and never mature because undergrad introductory courses are "too easy"yawn. No wonder you're a shartytard. Come back in 3-5 more years when you actually progressed to a point where you learned something worthwhile, or quit and play the unemployable "misunderstood genius".
all of you fags on this thread are probably in your generals right now and will go into actuarial sci. larping on 4chan is for dilators. larping about "no-name" schools is for dilators. larping about courses is for dilators.
>>16915954>introthere's your answer
Light is Love - a Physicist's InsightHow the Logic of Light Heals Ushttps://youtube.com/shorts/-neRj4b0hWU
>>16917811How do inanimate particles feel feelings? >You feel and therefore you are
>>16917811>Jeet crystal rubber new age woo
She is 23 years old now. Where is she?
Einstein was very likely a patent thief with only an above average IQ that failed up by attaching him name to less known high IQ individuals.
>>16915849I can only tell where you are anon.Posting on 4chan.
>>16915849>Einstein and Hawkins never took an IQ test or at least never revealed any scores>numbers are just made up>this is par for the course for the sham discipline of psychometrics
>>16915855based
>>16915849crashed out
Got my testosterone checked a few days ago and it came out to 250 nmol/dl. Any suggestions for areas of math I should study for someone of my testosterone level?
>>16917685why aren't these fags arrayed from left to right in or t level orderall I know is eugene is the asian guy 2nd from the leftfuck it I'm gonna guess the ranks are2, 3, 4, 1
>>16917685I just checked my test results from last year and I was at 750 ng/dL, holy shit anon eat a fucking steak or some shit.
Calculus was invented by Isaac Newton
>>16916638Eh.. that's exactly why the n-body problem can't be solved: Symmetries. The reason the cubic has a solution is because it belongs to [math]S_{3}[/math]. Likewise for physics, the reason you can find the trajectory of a ball thrown from the surface of the earth at any angle is because the system has 4 symmetries (and 3 degrees of freedom). If you had less than 3 symmetries, you couldn't solve it. That's what happens with the 3-body problem. You get 18 degrees of freedom but only 10 symmetries.
>>16916715I'm not that anon, just reading threads on /sci/, and wanted to say thank you for this explanation, this was very intuitive for me to understand the relationship between freedom and symmetry. It's kind of a profoundly interesting relationship actually. Again, thank you for exposing me to it.
>>16916790It's profoundly misinformed is what it is.Number of symmetries vs number of degrees of freedom has nothing to do with it.
>>16916797You don't know physics (or math for that matter)https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Integrable_system>In mathematics, integrability is a property of certain dynamical systems. While there are several distinct formal definitions, informally speaking, an integrable system is a dynamical system with sufficiently many conserved quantities, or first integrals, that its motion is confined to a submanifold of much smaller dimensionality than that of its phase space.Symmetry == conserved quantity (Noether's theorem). Dimension of submanifold (n) <= dimension of phase space (2n) - number of symmetries (n). This is what it means to be integrable/superintegrable.If you scroll down it tells you in plain english what this means for a system to be exactly solvable.>In physics, completely integrable systems, especially in the infinite-dimensional setting, are often referred to as exactly solvable models.Anything else you want to contribute?
>>16916200And like the Americas, Newton raped and murdered the natives of Calculus
Just heard about this hydrogen powerpaste method of storing and using hydrogen as a fuel.What do you guys think about it?If this could actually work I think it would revolutionize fuel transport and the energy landscape overall Some potential issues: - using paste as fuel will lead to issues with gunk buildup that wouldn't be suitable for high duty cycle vehicles (cars, certain remote generators, etc) - apparently takes significant energy to produce the paste, so not suitable for mass scale usage - while the paste energy density is higher than Li-ion batteries, it's way lower than gasoline by an order of magnitude That being said, the technology exists already, it is sustainable (since hydrogen is effectively free...) and can be produced fairly simply
>>16917581It's an expensive process and for all intents and purposes hydrocarbons are still almost free when pumped from the ground. It's not some weird trick, it's a basic collage level chemistry experiment you can do at your own house if you like.It will be done in the future, for instance it may be that aircraft never get good enough that they could be powered with batteries, especially high powered military types. So instead of using shitting electric planes you just use solar panels to make jet fuel and then use that in the aircraft. For that to be economically viable the price of crude oil has to be high enough to justify the process. For most things batteries will do the job way better however.
>>16916126Hydrogen is a hydrocarbon.It's just so minimal it lacks the carbon.
diesel?
>>16917630so the economics of a company like Terraform only work if the price of crude / natural gas increases to a price that manufacturing it is viable?How far in the future is that point? several decades at least?I guess its good to have the tech ready but I wonder why smart guys like casey handmer are working on this now
>>16917725If I knew I wouldn't be here explaining basic industrial processes to you but making bank on the oil futures market. All anyone knows is that solar is getting cheaper and oil is getting more expensive as it inevitably runs out.
My teacher said today that men with high testosterone may have weaker immune systems against viruses. Women, with more estrogen, tend to have stronger immune responses, possibly due to the extra X chromosome. This could explain why men experience more inflammatory symptoms, such as fatigue and pain, in viral infections. Is this true? I don't see how this could be true, considering that men have been involved in risky activities from the beginning, and a supposedly weaker immune system would be quite counterintuitive.
>>16917228Foids dp'd by vaccines and autoimmune disease.
>>16917235See>>16916901
>>16916849Ask her what about if you feel you have a y chromosome does that effect anything?
>>16916849From what I've heard estrogen is associated with a stronger immune response, which is part of why women are far more susceptible to autoimmune disease. I'm not sure if it necessarily means men are weaker against viruses or anything like that though, I don't think it's quite that simple.
>>16916849The life of a woman, social behavior at total saturation will lead to more viral infections. Men don't speak to another person for weeks on end
So I got a bachelor of science in mechanical engineering a couple of months ago. I want to take the Fundamentals of Engineering exam and get an Engineer-in-training certification. How difficult is it? I read >70% of people who take the one I'm going to take (mechanical) pass on the first try. I am studying by taking the NCEES-provided practice exams. How hard is the exam compared to those? Are they pretty representative of the actual exam? Will being an Engineer-in-training help me get a job?Thanks.
Getting a job in so 2010, are you sure post-scarcity isn't the literal next step since we have AI now?
>>16916921Well I am a EE who passed the FE and I mainly used the two practice tests on the MYNCEES website. I also bought the Learnova book from Amazon that has 1000 practice problems which I did most of. Make sure you know your math, because Math is like 7 to 11 of the problems of the test.
>>16917402Okay thank you. You can search the handbook with Ctrl+F, right?
>>16917473Yeah, CTRL+F is your friend during it. It's genuinely impossible to learn all the actual material. When you do the test, make sure you enter in the correct variable. I had practice tests where I technically got the wrong answer because I was like 3 orders of magnitude off since I didn't see the answer was asking for kilowatts. Make sure you know how to use your calculator. I had a problem asking about matrix multiplication which would take way too long by hand. Also you should plan to spend the week before the test like studying 5 hours a day, that's what I did. Here is the book I bought off Amazon. Good luck MechE anon.
>>16917522Good to know because the damn handbook is like 500 pages lol.Yep I'm making sure I got all my metric prefixes in order and doing the practice problems over and over again. Okay thanks EEAnon.
Evening reminds me of her.
I have mysterious force fatigue.
