According to the jews if you stop wasting seed (wanking) and you give 20% of your gross income to organizations lile this rabbi's, you are promised to get rich in this lifehttps://youtu.be/nV8-Wc0b6PM?t=277https://youtu.be/2S5mkE7lXOY?t=8512If a study was done that tracked 1000 people over 40 years and 100% of those people who did give 20% of their gross income to the same institution all became rich, wouldn't that prove Orthodox Judaism is right?
>>17081228>wouldn't that prove Orthodox Judaism is right?What are riches in this world useful for? Everyone dies. Even the richest man turns to dust.>For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life. John 3:16The riches in heaven are the only riches worth striving for. Read the New Testament ^~^
currently relearning maths from scratch, opinions on pic related as a starting point?
>>17075065sure it is...
Mathacadamy. It's 50 bucks a month but the best out there. Prepared me applied math university bachelor in Germany fittingly. Straightest course for adult learner to be prepared. Math foundations 1-3. Enjoy the ride.
>>17075065wrong.
>>17075013Engineering Mathematics by KA Stroud is better tbdesu
>>17075065no
>missed two doses of my clozapine >doc says its okay to take the full dose when my other doctor said this exact situation would result in needing to be retitrated I just want a second or third opinion.
>>17077833drugs are bad for you.
>>17077797fuck, I thought I was going to die. This stuff is poison. I'm going off it for 3 days and showing up at the emerg.
>>17077794Don't trust your doctor.
>>17077794imagine unironically taking chemical lobotomy pills in 2026are you forced to or just stupid?
>>17077794retitration is a meme
Is faster than light travel really impossible?
>>17077658Can you generate effective negative mass using phonon coupling in a rotating superfluid? Asking for a friend
>>17079900that seems like a lot of work to eat at a restaurant
your soul operates at a frequency faster than light, that's why you can't measure it.
>>17078278>>17078279Light travels instantly. It only looks like it takes time. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c8dfuXDGbB4&t=17m23s
>>17077147yes, thats why they increased the speed of light in 2050
as a brainlet I enjoy watching videos that tackle scientific subjects in an easy to understand way. sadly, I don't know of any channels that do this. I used to watch vsauce but he only makes edgy tiktaks now. any of the big channels are just there to waste everyone's time. numberphile is a retard podcast and hitting my head against a wall would result in less loss of brain function. I tried watching this navierstokes thing from black science man but he just kept talking over his guest (which seemed enthusiastic to talk about this equation). recommend me some channels that dive into scientific subjects and talk about them while being CONCISE please. jokes and stuff are fine but don't go overboard I also enjoy fireship to keep up with tech things, I don't watch every video but that's in line with what I want
>>17076508If you like old fashioned schooling I recommend Julius Sumner Miller. He's extremely autistic but wildly entertaining to watch.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PetBtLnjmWUhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S3i_3Vy-3_I
>>17079871>His latest stuff is groundbreaking.Because he's dead?
>>17079915>they're spending way too much time solving formula and talking about numbersMy problem with so many youtube and PBS type "explainers" is that they never go deep enough. It's like they think someone will take their job if they show too much behind the curtain. Guys, pretend you're doing an interdisciplinary seminar or something, Assume your audience has seen a shitload of other science before. Luckily there are indeed plenty of youtubers who go deeper and even show the math.
Physics explained and Curt Jaimungal then just search through the names of physicists for more interviewed on other channels.I watched some of Dr. Mayim Bialik last night, I think she's getting more viewers this year and is on the rise. (But not really OP's thing)
>>17076508Technology Connections talks more about electrical appliances and stuff, but if you enjoy long videos that mainly consist of a great storyteller sitting in front of the camera talking about something oddly interesting, check it out.I find his videos to be really entertaining and refreshing in a world of fast-paced hyperstimulating short video slop
sex
>>17077777Now that I've quit my mathematics phd for and honorary PHD in numerology and astrology I can confirm this poster is right.
SEXsssssssssual intercourse......and FELLLLLLLATIO!!!!!!
>>17077773
>>17077777This.
>>17077777Face it, tiger, you just hit the jackpot.
Not in the news, not in 4chan, not in phys.org, nowhere. why the fuck do I even browse this board for?C'mon guys, this is a big deal. The first stars in the universe
>>17080803>its disputed>no i have no idea who is disputing this>no i have nothing but contempt for their backwards theories>so yeah maybe check your privilege next time
>>17080878meds, now
>>17080783Its more of a slow blurn. It takes time, the galaxy has been known about for a long time. But only recently has it been found to have very little heavy elements. It's not really the first stars, as redshift 6 is quite late, when the universe was about a billion years old. The very first stars are too early and too faint for telescopes like JWST to find individually. So astronomers instead are looking for galaxies which started forming stars later, these tiny dwarf galaxies. And they can only be detected with the gravitational lensing of a galaxy cluster.
>>17080959Also this isn't the first claim of pop III. There has been several, even going back decades. This one is the most plausible, but it takes time for things to be tested.
>>17080783Iirc pop 3 stars are supposed to have gone nova before the universe became transparent enough to actually see them.
Why can't we just extract pic rel from a humans body and put it in a bath of synthetic whatever is needed to keep the thing functioning and functioning and voila, immortality
>>17073546Everything, especially biological creatures decay. Even if we mildly try to delay it messes things up.Human body is finely tuned machinery and cant be fucked with to much or it breaks.
>>17078824strongest antivax arguement
>>17073546>immortality>but muh thermodynamics>but muh copy of a copyWhat about pseudo-immortality? That is, not eternal but much longer than few decades, and not a perfect copy but almost (as I'm still "the same" even I forgot several things I knew and knew how to do with my body), and not perfectly embodied or conscious but well enough?
>>17073546Technically you just need the brain, the other parts just send it signals, and you can replicate the signals yourself.The brain needs to constantly maintain electrical balance or else it self destructs. To maintain this balance it needs a constant supply of ATP which is self genetates using Oxygen that it gets from the blood. The number one cause of death is issues with the body's blood system (cardiovascular system) because if anything cuts off the blood supply the electrical imbalance will fry the brain in a few minutes.>>17073623You are NOT free to do this yourself, suicide is actually illegal, and while you cannot arrest someone after they do it, you can arrest them in the process of doing it, just like you can arrest robbers before they are finished robbing, lol.
>>17073546>some loving god apparently designed this and totally not some malevolent species of reptilian NHI guys..lol
Why do theoretical physicists take this crap seriously? "space has 11 dimension" "no space has 1 dimension that solves our problems"you can easily start from a false premise and prove a true a false conclusion, mathematically. So why are people so quick to ignore the VERY OBVIOUS FACT that space has 3 dimensions???
>>17077874if Marxism isn't a generally accurate account of socioeconomic relations, why is the billionaire class finding it so effective to apply inverted Marxism?Marxism: "The bourgeois maintain power by distracting and dividing the working class, derailing the formation of class consciousness."Billionaires: Wow looks like we need to triple and quadruple down on doing that!
>>17077420Physicists have given up on reality and are just doing math to publish more papers.
>>17079364Can I save ur meme
>>17077420How do you think they will take this?https://youtube.com/shorts/Jb3m9Z0KK30
>>17077532did the voices tell you that
I need to write a comprehensive paper as part of the admissions process for a full scholarship. I'm currently on stage 3 of 4 of said process, having successfully progressed through the previous two. The problem I have is that quite a lot of the papers I need to access are behind paywalls. I've already checked SciHub/SciDB/SciNet and Machine Library, together they have maybe 40% coverage. Where else can I look?
>>17076335Ask AI to summarise each missing paper individually.>>17077810Also this. At the very least the library may have physical copies you can consult, if you can't access the database
>>17076335Do you not have access to your previous institutions leanlibrary or equivalent proxy extension? I still do lol
>>17076335Google scholar often has free preprint versions of papers. Search for it and choose "show all versions"
>>17076340nice
>>17076387>I'm doing a meta-analysisI was going to help until I read this
why yes anon of course every planet has a magnetic field that conveniently protects against dna destroying solar radiation how did you know?
>>17080720Not true. The magnetic field is only part of it. You need an atmosphere to actually stop the particles, a magnetic field just deflect them. Venus for example has a very weak magnetic field but no radiation problem on its surface.And it's not magic, a planetary magnetosphere can make life harder. The radiation environment around Jupiter is far worse that near the Earth, because it captures energetic particles and traps them. The surfaces of its inner moons like Io and Europa are probably completely sterile because of the very high radiation dose. Life there is only likely under the ice.
>>17080893These are just axioms.
>>17080894>evolution is only true if I invent a tautology where existence can only happen due to evolutionain't no way...
>>17080921Do you even know what that word means?
>>17080893This post is ChatGPT tier nonsense.
This works, it's coming at the industrial level, and there's STILL a big gaping hole in the theory that justifies LENRs and adjacent observed phenomena. Does anyone want to at least try to plug it with something that is coherent with the standard model, before its application as a technology breaks the model open and tarnishes forever the reputation of physics?
>>17080795Cold fusion in 2 more weeks.
Just stick some obese water and like some muons or whatever in a box and shake it up
How did glasses go from being invented in the 14th century just as a reading aid and staying that way for centuries until it became basically expected for a fourth of the 40+ population to wear them all day in the 20th century? And now like 90% of east Asian zoomers use them? Is myopia a social contagion like transgenderism or glass delusion, that spread after figures like Benjamin Franklin and Harold Lloyd made it fashionable and high status? Does this also explain the revulsion glassoids feel towards laser surgery and lenses, that the myopia is more like a subconscious urge to wear glasses than an actual problem with the eye?
>>17080636>poking you eye-bones with your finger will improve your visionNow I know you are trolling.
>>17080083>why didn't people wear glasses at a time when most of them died before needing themtruly a mystery
>>17080825Of course it won't improve anything, you will just feel it is the cause.>>17080849People need them since their childhood. He seriously looks like he needed them, BTW.
>>17080083>how did something useful become so widely usedTruly a mystery.
one of the most pointlessly retarded threads ive come across, thanks
What triggers the decay of a single particular atom?
>>17078021I suppose it's because an atom has an equal chance of degrading every second, it can happen 1 second after its creation like in 1 billion years but by counting plenty we can make an average life expectancy, nothing in an atom degrades in the sense that the atom becomes fragile to the point of exploding, it just happens.
>>17078021I do it. Hard work but someone's gotta do it
>>17080683so it's unstable but nothing changes over time? how does that make sense wouldn't that be stability by definition? if you have an unstable form usually there'd be signs, like an inverted triangle toppling over.
>>17078865>we can't even model the particles and our best models are kindergarten drawings but we can definitely say that there is no information about the particle that we aren't able to measure
>>17080777>prove Cthulhu doesnt' exist chud
Everyone uses this image ironically. What are some REAL examples of this?I think it is refusing life saving treatment. Jehovah's Witnesses refuse blood because they are retarded but Einstein refused to be saved because he was just like, "Why fight nature and artificially extend my time? Seems pointless to me." Lol.
>>17078494>Why fight natureEinstein was a retard.
>>17079820No, this was one of the points he was right. You think you are better then nature? Retarded fool.
>>17078494
>>17078601Pretty nice
>>17079636now overlay the IQs for each group
