Are bears so smart because they eat all that fish
they eat fish for a few weeks when salmon swim upstream, they don't eat fish rest of the time
>>16928560prove it using set theory
>>169285631. The CategoriesLet [math]\mathbf{T}[/math] be a category representing time intervals (days/weeks of the year).Let [math]\mathbf{F}[/math] be a category of food availability (Salmon, Berries, Roots, Small Mammals).Let [math]E: \mathbf{T} \to \mathbf{F}[/math] be the "Eating" functor that maps a specific time to a specific food source.2. The Salmon Run as a Natural TransformationThe claim is that "eating fish" is not a constant state but a specific mapping.Let [math]T_{\text{run}} \subset \mathbf{T}[/math] be the subcategory of the "few weeks" when salmon swim upstream.For all [math]t \in T_{\text{run}}[/math], the functor [math]E(t) = \text{Salmon}[/math].For all [math]t \notin T_{\text{run}}[/math], [math]E(t) \cong \text{Berries} \oplus \text{Roots} \oplus \text{Other}[/math].3. The Morphism of DietIn category theory, if bears ate fish all the time, there would be a natural isomorphism between the bear's total diet and the set of all fish.However, the user is arguing that the morphism [math]f: \text{Bear} \to \text{Fish}[/math] is only a split monomorphism (an embedding) that exists exclusively during the object [math]T_{\text{run}}[/math]. Outside of that specific temporal window, there is no mapping to the "Fish" object in [math]\mathbf{F}[/math].4. The Conclusion (Q.E.D.)The "Smart Bear" theory fails because the product of [math](\text{Fish} \times \text{Bear Intelligence})[/math] only exists in the fiber over [math]T_{\text{run}}[/math]. Since [math]T_{\text{run}}[/math] is a tiny slice of the total year [math]\mathbf{T}[/math], the bear's "smartness" cannot be globally attributed to a local morphism.
Taking strolls in the woods significantly improves the mental health by reducing stress hormones like cortisol, lowering blood pressure, and easing anxiety or depression.Bears do that all the time.
>>16928648They leisurely wipe their backsides on bunny rabbits. But seriously, they have a repressed mind because they have to hibernate for months and need to get their fats up. Sounds autistic with the math. Are you in?.
I've set up a bioinformatics toolchain that I run on my arch linux machine.The workflow is managed by two shell scripts, one does a fetch, and is called by the other that runs the tools.you input the organism name in the command, then it runs for a long time and outputs reference genomes, annotations, filtered protein sequences, designed backbones + sequences + predicted structures, validation results, logs, and a README summaryThe steps it goes through and the tools are:Genome download (RefSeq preferred to GenBank to clustered fallback) + header cleanupQuality control (adapter trimming, basic stats) BBTools (bbduk)Repeat masking RepeatModeler, RepeatMaskerGene prediction: BRAKER3 for eukaryotes (OrthoDB + optional RNA hints) or Prokka for prokaryotesProtein extraction/filtering (longest isoform, ≥100 aa prok / >200 aa euk) gffread and biopythonBackbone generation with RFdiffusion (de novo or motif-scaffolded)Sequence design using ProteinMPNN (8 variants per backbone)Batch structure prediction with ColabFold (AlphaFold2)Remote BLASTp validation against nr (top hit recorded)Functional renaming based on BLAST inferenceMarkdown report (managed in Conda envs)The toolchain automates the entire process from a name through reference genome retrieval, quality control and annotation, protein extraction, AI-driven de novo protein design (backbones and sequences), structure prediction, BLAST-based validation, functional renaming, and generation of a clear Markdown report. Also an electron gui for directing other programs to visualize the output, making queries in a search bar, and a fallback 3dmol.js viewer.
>>16927424Did you vibe code it?
>>16927424How would that be interesting to a biologist, seems neat for a data hoarder but usually as a biologist you try to figure out a protein or a pathway, predicted TFs, binding domains, homology to other known proteins, atac-seq + rnaseq under different conditions of gene of interest are quite useful and you don't save that data.As far as I understand it most genomes people work on have been annotated better than your pipline and the ones that hadn't will usually struggle with not enough homology to be useful.
>>16927454it does design too nowhttps://zenodo.org/records/18976525
>>16927431yes
>Water is an elementPerfectly reasonable, makes complete sense.>Air is an elementPerfectly reasonable, makes complete sense.>Fire is an elementBut fire isn't a physical thing in the same way as the others. Things clearly cannot be made out of fire?>Earth is an elementBut you can clearly just look at dirt and see that it's composed of many different little bits of things. It clearly has smaller components, which means it obviously cannot be the smallest unit that composes other things>Metal is an elementBut you have metallurgy, you know that metal is made out of other stuff.>Wood is an elementwtf is China smoking?
>>16928542Boiling it and seeing stuff left behind is easily explained as the water being contaminated.
>>16928542>But you can just boil it and see that some shit gets left behindBecause there's some earth in it. Baybe some fire too.>Why does some air kill you and some not?Because there's fire in it. Maybe earth too.
can we express the elements in set notation so I can understand op's image?
>>16928535I have to admit some religious observations. are simple, and they go off on a strange angle.
>>16928535Elemental thinking makes sense if you are willing to put yourself in the mindset. It's an abstraction and philosophical representation of the world not an explanation. Why would it matter that earth is made out of different things? Those different things are all made out of earth. The same with the Chinese metal etc.
Initial axioms:To grow as a human, one must self-reflect.Let the extent of self-reflection be R, then:R ~ T (R is proportional to T, where T is time spent on self-reflection)Calculations:T=t-w-s-r (time available for self-reflection is nothing other than life time minus time spent on work, time spent on sleep, time spent on recreation)We assume t-w is a constant, as a person doesn’t have much power to change their life time in a positive direction and their work time in a negative direction. However, we must immediately infer that unemployment = personal growth from the above equation and axioms provided. As proof is trivial, it is left as an exercise to the reader.r=k/s, as the less one sleeps, the more time they spend on escapism.There is no strong correlation between s and w, as one who sleeps poorly just works the same amount of time but less efficiently and takes more breaks which is r, not w.Differentiating T with respect to independent variable s yields:dT/ds=-1+k/s2Obviously it is DNE at s=0, but that does not interest us, as s>0.-1+k/s2=0 to find relative extrema:k=s2s=k^½Let’s find a second derivative to see if it’s max or min:-2k/s3 < 0, at s=k^½, so it’s a max.So:sr=kComment too long. Click here to view the full text.
chatgpt thread
senior undergrad in physicsthis one prof keeps giving me weird fucking looks. how do I publicly assert my status as the alpha without going to prison and/or getting fugged by the department?
>>16928356give him the ol' pigs head infront of doorcam obviously
>>16928356Explain the looks. Does he want to fuck you?
>>16928391confusingly long bouts of sustained eye contact that I'm too acoustic to bitch out ofcan't tell if he wants to have a fist fight in the parking lot or suck my dick>>16928362I pretty much do
>>16928356experimentally calculate the coefficient of friction between his penis and your anus
>>16928588I don't want to prison rape the guy, giving or receiving.Looking for socially acceptable ways to make him fear for his life enough to not bother me or look in my direction
Revenge of the Jewess
that's not /sci/ related>>>/pol/
>>16928561It's also not /pol/ related>>>/tv/
What makes women in this pic so attractive when evolutionarily speaking they are useless compared to a chubby powerlifter with wide hips, a 200iq and a triple phd?
Wide hips don't mean that tye hole baby goes throigh is large. Black women hace wide hips, still can't give a birth to a baby with a large head.
>>16924723The majority of men would want to fuck one of these but wanting to fuck a chubby powerlifters is basically a fetish.Evolution= likelihood of reproducing
>>16924723>What makes women in this pic so attractiveTons of makeup.
>>16924723it's the hair
>>16924723if it doesn't PREVENT reproduction, then evolution produces randomness, see picwhat's the point of this shit ?
Uhhh, are you sure Qualia isn't just a hallucination or representation of the inner machinations of the brain? Free will is not real and the illusion of free will is created by the brain. The brain is basically just an AI that is entirely dependent on non-random physical phenomenon like electricity and chemical signals. There is no proof free will or qualia is even real. We are just a byproduct of the natural physical shit happening in the brain that evolved to simulate intelligent choices and feelings are just a hallucination that overrides the fake choices lol.
>>16927429Yes, that's what I'm saying. The fact that there is experience is absolutely true and doesn't need further proof Anything else is unprovable. "I think, therefore I am" is not literally true. IIRC Nietzsche already dismantled the literal interpretation
>>16927437>Yes, that's what I'm saying.Sorry. I'm so tired of faggots touting that statement as an affirmation of empiricism that's it's become like a kneejerk reflex for me to explain it.
>>16927429>But beyond that, no single thing can ever be stated with complete certainty. Beyond that, there is no such thing as proof of anything.That's obviously not what Descartes thought as he went on to prove a bunch of things, including the existence of God. kek
>>16927560I gave you a link to his correspondences. Clearly you didn't even bother to read them.
>>16920854both body and mind, it seems we are a ship of theseus, and yet...the most interesting thing to me is how impossible it is to find the 'me' inside my brain, the feeling of being a 'me' is still impossible to unseethe more you look into it, the more you see how everything in your actions and thoughts are completely spontaneous.i think there is a good chance that some of the people who became big names in the eastern traditions could actually break free from this illusionlike those optical illusions that you see movement even even though you know it is a static picture
What drives the correlation between brain size and intellect? Actual causality is quite weak. Why did homo brains get so big?
>>16927719whales have a lot of nerves that need to end somewhere
homo sapien brain is big because homo ancestors brain is big, easy
You see, the fruit, it expanded the minds of the apes. It may have been a fruit, a monolith, or both. If you eat a computer chip and the current from your body activates it, it could begin to alter your genetics. Eating hallucinogens may have triggered a epigenetic change resulting in neural and cranial structure.
Unironically eating more meat.
>>16927335maybe with so much intelligence a species will require even more machinery for self-deceptions, otherwise it won't breed
As someone who has worked with DNases for over 30 years, the only conclusion you can come to when you see this much residual DNA left in shots is that they want it there... Yes, they perform some kabuki theatre to convince the regulators they are trying to get rid of it but alas... Since they got a silver star for participating in the nuclease ritual, they can now call the DNA a "process related impurity". Its not a process related impurity when they fail to disclose it (SV40). Its a contaminant. And when they run out and purchase cancer companies after injecting billions of people, it becomes a deliberate mass poisoning of the population.. After all, they cannot claim incompetence when their own patents declare the oncogenic risk and they intentionally designed PCR assays to under measure it.https://x.com/Kevin_McKernan/status/2031707949018558676Yup. Everybody who took "covid vaccine" was injected with a cancer-inducing machine. Deliberately. xD
In this new PLOS ONE study (n=106 term placentas, mostly vaccinated mothers), spike protein was detected in 29% (31/106), predominantly in fetal cells: Hofbauer macrophages (fetal immune cells, 77% of positives), syncytiotrophoblast, trophoblasts, villous endothelium.https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0344185Key evidence SP was vaccine-derived:- No viral RNA anywhere; nucleocapsid (infection marker) absent in fetal cells & rare overall (only 3 maternal-side cases, all vaccinated + late infection).- Vaccine modRNA directly detected in 2/9 tested: BNT162b2 in maternal decidual cells; mRNA-1273 in fetal villous endothelial cells.- Authors speculate: "spike protein found on the fetal side is not derived from viral infection. Instead... uptake of freely circulating spike subunit-1 protein or local spike production by vaccine-transfected cells."- SP in Hofbauer cells "predominantly seen in placentas of vaccinated women" (only 6% in non-vaccinated infected).Potential consequences underlined:- Vaccine components breach placental barrier, reaching fetal vasculature & immune cells -> possible local SP production or accumulation in fetus.- Fetal exposure during development could affect immune programming, inflammation, or organogenesis (long-term effects unknown).Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>16928117A 2022 study (aligned with "vaccine" producer interests by authors funding) found "absence of the SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein in the placenta" post-vaccination, concluding mRNA vaccines "do not reach significant concentrations in the placenta."https://www.modernpathology.org/article/S0893-3952(22)00272-1/fulltextUniversity of Utah Health (2022) asserted: "COVID-19 vaccines DO NOT cross the placenta."https://healthcare.utah.edu/healthfeed/2022/01/facts-about-covid-19-and-pregnancyUniversity of Utah Health received Pfizer grants for educational programs (post-COVID conditions, up to $300K in 2023; COVID-19 educational grants in 2020) and collaborated on vaccine studies (SHIELD-Utah comparing Novavax/Pfizer etc).University of Chicago Medicine (2023) stated: "Vaccine components or mRNA do not cross the placenta and enter the baby's circulation."https://www.uchicagomedicine.org/forefront/coronavirus-disease-covid-19/mrna-covid-19-vaccine-pregnancy-breastfeedingUniversity of Chicago Medicine received Pfizer funding (2016-2019, via Pfizers independent grants program).Thats how you differentiate a science from a so-y-ence, by finding out who pays who xD
>>16927767
does that mean im gonna die
>>16928473You should drink your pee so your body gets proteins and other metabolites so it can fight the spikers
no spooks pls, they are tasteless
namefags btfo
>senile artist creates unsolvable gibberish to waste our time Many such cases
>this will never happen in your lifetime
>>16928292don't eat the red dust
>>16928253this will never happen, period
>>16928253No shit
>>169282632nd won't happen because there aren't enough volatiles on Mars.
>>16928253It will never happen. Never.
You have 5 million dollars and 5 years to increase your IQ...What to do?
>>16927783try to discover a drug that forces neuron proliferation in prefrontal cortex. Or just increase the processing speed of already existing neurons.IDK.
>>16927783I would buy nueralink and synchronize my thalamus with a chimpanzee (full multiplex), so I can mutually share a experience with it. We would play chess taking turns winnings, But I would use the chimps ultra fast working memory for math champion ships. We would both take mushrooms and ketamine like Elon Musk, and I would find other animals we could hive mind with.
>>16927783Do math
>>16927783fucking pepeposts, always the most retarded shitI wouldn't be surprised if these threads are made by janjans for "engagement" fucking retard fest
>>16927783Fuck IQ i'll just take the 5m and go scubadiving.
Idea for a mobile app:Alice video-calls Bob with an intentional delay of, let's say, 20 seconds; both are using smartphones and mobile data transmission through the Internet, maybe the cell network. The two devices can interact with each other using some overlayed user interface on the screen (like buttons) with which the caller can ask the second user to do a challenge with the set delayed transmission in some kind of buffer (hopefully I said that right because I'm not so tech savvy). The other user had to already have his camera recording with 20 seconds or more of anticipation, before the call, which would be the transmitted, buffered video stream.Can that be implemented in such a way that one person is sending a signal to the other person x seconds into the past, somehow, due to the transmission lag?I got this idea after watching a livestream of a Tokyo skyline scenery that I discovered was approximately delayed by 20 seconds; meaning, if I asked, via a smartphone, a hypothetical friend walking in front of a live webcam transmission with a lag measurable in seconds, in some Japanese city via a mobile messaging app like Line or Telegram (which is basically instantaneous), to do a hand gesture to the webcam whose livestream I can see on my laptop, and that person was conscious about the present moment, he or she would know I was watching them make a hand gesture x seconds ago, but he would also know I'm still watching them "right now".Hopefully I'm just posting retarded troll Physics at 12:36 A.M. and not something real that could be dangerous.
>>16928090This is pretty babblish but to sum it up, no you can't send signals to the past using a cell phone video call.I suspect you had something else in mind, try it again tomorrow.
>watch a movie that I already know the ending to>I BROKE PHYSICS
Time on a earthly scale is uniform.
what if there were 2 planets and they were 2 light years apart and I stood inbetween them with a laser pointer in each hand and turned them on at the same time and I told them earlier that I was going to do that then when one planet sees the laser pointer they know the other planet is also seeing the laser pointer if though the other planet is 2 lightyears away so it'd be impossible for them to know that in real time would the universe explode?
>>16928259Einstein said time is relative to the observer. Are you saying that line of thinking doesn't apply on Earth (assuming we live on a ball Earth floating in space)? Satellites supposedly have to adjust their clocks for time dilation in orbit.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Error_analysis_for_the_Global_Positioning_System#Relativity
why do we colloquially measure weight in kg instead of Newtons?
>>16927963Mental retardation or 12
>>16925963Weight is measured in newtons or pounds. Calling any measurement in kilograms as "weight" is nonsense. Kilograms measure mass, not weight.
>>16922619scales measure mass by measuring the weight and dividing by Earth's gravitational acceleration.if you want to be pedantic then measuring mass would be impossible since the only way to do it involves a force of some kind.
>>16928058sorry anon, you can use cm if it makes you feel better
Because gravity is constant enough to replace force with mass
