Is this true?
>take any two rational numbers>there are infinitely many irrational numbers between them>take any two irrational numbers>there are infinitely many rational numbers between themthis means you have fractal infinities. it's like saying there is a galaxy between any two dust particles, and inside of said galaxy replete with dust particles, there are infinitely many galaxies between each of those particles. this is literally turtles all the way down, and mathematicians will tell you that there is no problem with this.
Hello, would you like [math] \rho \left( \frac{\partial \boldsymbol{u}}{\partial t} + (\boldsymbol{u} \cdot \nabla)\boldsymbol{u} \right) = -\nabla p +\nabla \cdot \left \{\mu \left [\nabla \boldsymbol{u} + (\nabla \boldsymbol{u})^{T} - \frac{2}{3}(\nabla \cdot \boldsymbol{u})\boldsymbol{I} \right] \right \} + \nabla[\zeta(\nabla \cdot \boldsymbol{u})] + \rho \boldsymbol{a} [/math] apples?
>>16857505Do you unironically believe space is a real manifold?
>>16857496why wouldn’t it be?
You actually have to go beyond your fingers to count the months in a calendar, or the days in a month.But yes, most of math is useless.
me at the barber tho
>>16857670>knuckles and web space
>>16857635Anonkun, he is clearly a finitist.
>>16857496
>>16857680nice nice
>>16857680I actually loves me 3d math graphs, it's a shame that I don't know much about them other than u can make so.e with sin/cos and xyz. I remember at my uni classes some strange formula produced sick ass looking 3d shit
>>16857754Completely forgot about that lol.
Yes only earth does math space is it's father and is superior Space doesn't think emc2
>>16857505sounds basedhaven't you seen the grid? the worlds within world, points within points matrix?
>seems like it was made to make things easier>filters meI might be handicapped
