It's too controversal for A.I. to answer, and I know DNA effects your pheramones and there must be some inherent feature outside of diet, why do Asians smell so strange like plastic byproducts or like burning paint that's been rained on?
>>16865658Non-whites say that whites smell like dairy to them. If any of you retards were actually educated you'd know that you smell like what you eat.
>>16866123I don't smell because I take a shower you silly pajeet
>>16865607Source for any of this you mentioned? Cause if you do basic self care like bathing, wearing deodorant, being in shape, and having a healthy diet you shouldn't smell bad at all, no matter your ethnicity.
>>16866829kill yourself trans normgroid filth.
>>16865893>this junk paper was actually published kek
>Supposedly "the smartest mathematician alive">Can't solve the Riemann Hypothesis because he proclaims that the le tools are not available>Says just gotta wait for a breakthrough (cause he can't make that breakthrough himselfl)What a useless retarded chink lmao https://www.youtube.com/shorts/XESDBlwkb1U
he proved that statistically the collatz conjecture is true. pretty huge result imo.as far as im concerned the media hyped him up not himself. although when he did that collab with masterclass that was very funny.besides, idgaf about muh millennium prize problems. perelman may have solved the poincare conjecture but tao gave us two amazing analysis books. for me that is worth more to me than the poincare conjecture because in all honestly, i will never understand that.
>>16866445dumb faggot
>>16866764Bro if you are reading tao's books I'm pretty sure you can understand the poincare conjecture. Unless you mean understanding the proof, I'm sure that's more difficult (I haven't tried).
>>16866210>https://www.youtube.com/shorts/XESDBlwkb1Uhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XESDBlwkb1Ufix your fucking slop embeds when you're making slop drama garbage posts you fucking subhumansworthless site
>>16866216who wrote the math? a team of libtards?
I'm racially (as in descending from the slaves and their masters) african-american, so this topic perturbs me particularly.I'll often peek into and sometimes speak in "chud" spaces, and one thing I've seen an increasing amount of is the claim that american "blacks" are actually becoming dumber. From what little I've seen, this phenomenon seems to be limited to big cities, and noticing just how fertile the dumbest of "black" women are, I'm willing to bet that the cause is just immigration. I'm still concerned, though, because I also know that our mean iq *seems* to have stopped increasing in the early 2000's after reaching 88: I recall a counter study to a claim that we now had an average of 93 in 2010's?(I actually don't remember where I read it nor when it was published) showing that there was no increase from 88 when age was standardized, so I don't see an actual decline as impossible. Then again, immigration could've also acted to mask any gains that have occurred since then..Regardless, I'd like your input.
>>16862953hungry
>>16863188>how come all the predominantly black countries in the Caribbean are without exception all shitholes Barbados, Bahamas, Aruba, Saint Kitts and Nevis aren't shitholes
>>16862951Nigga, be sure to rest your feet when you’re finished tap dancing in this thread
>>16866381
>>16864113>Meaning that this is likely happening because of genetic and environmental factors, falling even further due to the mass immigration happening simultaneously.Nah. The guys juat pushed the updated score to high. It always fluctuates for IQ tests so so years people "score" higher, others lower. It's an unavoidable part if the testing because you effectively have to predict where the next appropriate benchmark to use as a comparison.
Do people actualy considering economics and sociology /psychol ogy a science?
>>16866225No, Mr ESL. Next question.
Currently not yet, but economics has a shot if it wanted to truly be one, there are some notable efforts of incorporating concepts of math used in physics and also the so called dead discipline econophysics. But for sociology I don't think it could qualify as a science unless you put a broader definition where you would include humanities as a social thing I guess which would ruin and need different interpretations for the term and would just over-complicate current established definitions.
can you find the area of the circle without using chatGPT or any AI?
>>16862536x = 360/3 = 120The animation has neither 2*x – 1 = 239, nor 2*x + 1 = 241, frames.It has 2*x = 240 frames.The first frame corresponds to θ = 90 – x = –30 degrees.The last frame corresponds to θ = 90 + x – 1 = 209 degrees.
>>16863505>it's bimodalPlot[90 – 30*Sign[Sin[(π*θ)/180] + 1/2], {θ, 0, 360}]
25pi/3
>>16865248>[radius =] 5*√3/3You're 7 + 30 – 25 = 12 days late to the party. Proof:>>16857006>radius is the side of the triangle divided by the square root of 3
>>16856857Yes I cannext question please
You should be able to solve this
>>16866800>Because in every "birth try" either 1 boy or 1 girl is given birth with equal probability, the proportion will stay the same
>>16866805This is one of those faggy "gotcha!" word problems based on semantics. What does a realistic interpretation of the problem yield?>>16863782
>>16866811It yields exactly what I posted, which is why I posted it.
>>16866806makes sense>in generation 0 there's 50 couples, they all have the first kid, 50% of them are girls, 50% of them are boys, 25 stop, 25 keep going, then the 25 couples left all have a second child, half are boys, half are girls, 12.5 stop, 12.5 keep going, third...
>>16863782My rates start at 500 USD / hr.
Do you subscribe to a-theory of time or b-theory of time? a-theory = presentism (there is only the presentb-theory = growing block (both the past and present exist) or eternalism (there is past, present and future all existing at the same time)
>>16866270Indeed the absolute frame of reference is the universe itself.Whether you think it's conscious or not.
>>16866244Just the Presentism one. It just makes the most logical sense to me. I think of it like a river where some parts of the water are flowing faster than others, like maybe near the shore is flowing slower than near the middle of the river, but it's all still flowing downstream. The faster middle part of the river isn't flowing into the future faster, it just happens to be moving faster. At a universe scale, in some regions of space particles are moving faster in some locations relative to others, they're not literally in the future, it's all still happening at the same time. If you could freeze the whole universe at any time like a snapshot then every particle would be captured in that moment. If you then took another snapshot some time later then some particles wouldn't have vanished off into the future, they're still there, they were just moving faster so had more interactions etc.
>>16866309i agree.
>>16866244One step further to 4D eternalism.All possible pasts presents and futures all exist at all times.Get on my fucking level.
>>16866244present simply doesn't exist at all in relativity (since it changes with the observer even if two observers are at the same location but move with respect to each other).
>the earth is round>the complexities of life are explained by evolution>vaccines workare you actually equipped and able to prove basic theories of science? or do you just lean on "the consensus says it's true so it must be"?note for the autists: it isn't about these particular questions, but consider any number of things you take for granted. how much of them can you actually prove?
>>16866736most people don't even understand basic induction so what the fuck are you talking about?
>>16866736science is just one more tool for those bastards to fuck my shit withhttps://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ipsrj1jJ1eM
Why does he intimidate you so much?
I respect this guy. I find his explanations very good in pedagogical perspective. However I'm too educated to be his audience.
>>16865784>Uh uh uh if you do the calculations santa couldn't possibly reach all the chimneys in the world even using mean least distance regress...."shut up fag", the man.
>>16865784Did you know you can only kiss your mirror reflection on the lips?
>>16865784It’s because he’s a hard ass skeptic who supports trans logic and even people like Bill Maher are like “wut” >>16865837This will never not be one of the best /sci/ memes
i didnt know anything about him until pol started talking about him. listened to his stuff and he seems pretty reasonable.
How can we be expected to deal with men (primarily white men) who feel entitled to having sex and a female house slave despite having a small penis? I have here a peer reviewed article from an academic journal that breaks down each and every single undue entitlement these small-dicked white guys think they're supposed to have, and I never realized how bad white dudes' psychosis actually is. This was an eye-opening read for me, and made me realize that the line between a dicklette and an incel (a known terrorist sub-group of the Western world's population) is way too fine to consider separate from each other. Is there a way to put small-dicked (smaller than 18cm x 13cm) dudes into re-education (with possible chemical castration) camps so they don't commit a bombing just because they're biological failures?Source:Rowland, A. L. (2023). Small dick problems: Masculine entitlement as rhetorical strategy
>>16864506>friends>TV tropesWhat god forsaken freakshow passing itself off as a journal is this?
>>16864722Asking the right questions, anon. Maybe when women build and maintain a civilization their preferences will legitimately matter. As for the question: neither. I'll settle for a reasonably intelligent and moderately attractive woman over freaks (top) and retards (bottom).
>>16864722>woman>140IQlmfaojust get the stacy before she's worn out, or wear her out yourself
>>16864722Why would I choose any of these over my russian wife with K cup tits?
>>16864506> here a peer reviewed article from an academic journal that breaks down each and every single undue entitlement these small-dicked white guys think they're supposed to haveI know this is a shitty, low effort troll thread, but that's not what your paper says at all and you're retarded.
>E=MC^2>C^2m^2/s^2? Isn't that change of kinematic viscosity over time? How the fuck does that work out?
>>16864185F=maE=W=int F*dlThe units work out
>>16864284But how does it work out? How do we have the same dimensions as an acceleration of kinematic viscosity?
>>16864612Energy : joulesMass : gramsSpeed squared : meters squared per second squaredMass x speed squared : grams x meters squared per second squaredjoules : grams x meters squared per second squaredIf you're still confused, try asking a question in English instead of gibberish.
are there any websites online where you can propose, solve and discuss Science & Math problems with other people? i mean like the we have here with /sci/ bait threads, but with the goal to actually solve them and learn something rather than just make people as mad as you can
>>16864966>https://hikari3.ch/aca/I didn't know they had this board
>>16864425>with people the form matches the contentYou must have the dumbest shape possible.
>>16864453If he was able to verify the information, he wouldn't need to ask, obviously. Retard.
>>16866716If he cant verify information, then asking anyone for it wont help. Someone without a built in sanity check in their mind will just believe whatever others tell them, whatever AIs tell them. In that scenario, they would not be able to survive in this flat earth
>>16865023I liked the harry potter fanfic even though it's really ridiculous and stupid. It's fun fantasy slop all the sites he made are terrible though
Why are humans different from every other species in that they can't be selectively bred for certain traits? I'm npt talking about racist stuff though because race is obviously not real.
>>16863226>your only purpose as a male is to breed as many females as possibleWhy? >this is why biologically men are attracted only to looksI can acknowledge that a woman is attractive while also hating her and wanting nothing to do with her.
>>16863585That's a recent phenomena that only started after female contraception amd feminism came about. The elites traditionally had a lot of children and put great stock in their legacies and families. Sure, you have the occassional family that has no male heirs or a line that died out, but these things happened to peasant families too. We just didn't hear about it because that's how historical records work. The rich elites were the ones with better food and more access to healthcare in times where socially acceptable sex was gatekept by marriage and contraception wasn't around. Everyone bred, the elites managed to rear more children to adulthood.
>>16863198That could be due to our upright walk. That repositions our hips and makes the womans glutes and thighs bigger in relation to the rest of the body. Dicksize could also have been selected for not by female preference but by intermale competition back when monogamy wasn't around yet. It could also be true that dicksize correlates with another trait that is actually being selected for, such as high-t aggression and strength.
It's possible to do eugenics that is not pseudo-science, like selective breeding of livestock. The reason eugenics on humans is always pseudo-science is because there's always an underlying political motive for selection, then they'll just work backwards from the result they need to get (only the most politically powerful race gets to breed) and just make up any rules or data to allow them to justify their pre-made decisions. Hypothetically, it's perfectly possible to do selective breeding on humans based on logic and data. But it has never happened before, and it probably never will happen, because it is ALWAYS going to get coopted by political pressure.
>>16863199Anon, are you a virgin? Women like foreplay because otherwise sex can easily hurt them. Don't take the size of the birth canal during childbirth as the maximum size dick a woman can take.
Factories on the moon - editionprevious >>16862428
>>16868365Rocks are being eroded on alien worlds RIGHT NOW
>>16868560It's not negligible. Laptops on the ISS regularly crash in the SAA. Spacecraft like Hubble have to deactivate their instruments when passing through the SAA.
>>16868775Why don't they just boost power to their shields
Page 9 staging.>>16868797>>16868797>>16868797
>>16868810This is not ok.
How do astrophysicists actually know that once a cloud of gas becomes big enough, it collapses into a star? Such a process has never been observed. No one has replicated this in a lab at any scale.
>>16866105>>16866208well you gotta stat somewhere. they do what they can with what they have.
>>16865958because newly formed stars are commonly found around giant clouds of gas.
>>16865958You can see this happening in real time. Herbig–Haro objects and protoplanetary disks.
>>16865958Nobody knows anything. We just have models that seem to work. They came up with this idea, it explains a lot, models a lot and everyone who tried to come up with a better idea that accounts for things better failed.
>>16865958https://www.space.com/hubble-telescope-new-star-fs-tau-b#
