You know, I am somewhat of a mathematician myself.
>>16848136looks like a ChatGPT output but Brown's "Topology and Groupoids" uses that exact notation (i.e. [math]\mathcal{N}_X(x)[/math] to refer to the neighborhood of the point x in X)
>>16850603This
>>16850603kek
>>16844265
>>16844213Is Elon Garrison an Indian?
Say something nice about her.
>>16850881That's a paywall. Doesn't matter how cheap. And crypto's a scam. Always has been. This isn't even necessary. The laws that governed the site were never perfectly legal, but now we have to "trust the process"? What is this fucking democrat horseshit?
>>16850891a paywall is a wall where you have to pay to get past the wall.to get a copy of an academic paper you just paste the doi in the field same as its always been, no walls.she's better suited to run a rag tag grey water shitcoin than 99% of the so called industry.for that reason i'm happy to throw the dice on the meme coin
>>16850916Maybe I've just gotten unlucky, but I've tried to download several decade+ old texts recently and Sci-hub hasn't been able to do it. It's not even giving a normal "can't find it" message. It's literally shifting to a black white page with russian text saying the text isn't available in Russian in like 10 pt font.
>>16850936give me a doi and i will try to find it and post the mirror
>>16850353She's good. >>16850384>She's StalinistGood.>>16850411>She's a GRU plant.Good. >>16850936>>16850891>>16850879Anon you don't need academic texts if you are this fucking retarded.
This might be a dumb question to ask but I'll say it anyway. In theory, would it be mathematically possible to connect two computers together? And by that, I mean having two computers sending messages to each other without having to rely on anything physical. No cable, wi-fi, bluetooth, radio, satellites, not using light in any way whatsoever. Just pure mathematics. Can such a thing be realized or would it actually be impossible in theory?
>>16851359Hold on, OP, I'm sending you some nudes of your mom via differential geometry. Eigenvector me a reply when you get them.
>>16851384wtf...that's crazy....
>>16851359>a tunnel of hopes and dreamsI can put you in a fMRI while you continue to wank over your thread.That likely correlates with your phone.
>>16851384Look how wet you made me.
>>16851445k
What are some things that can improve brain health, executive function and cognition besides supplements/peptides?
stuff to do to maintain brain health... keeping generally mentally active, eating right sleepingimprove it?bullshitcant
>>16849157Put down your phone.Never pick it back up.You are now CEO of your life.
Breath training.Use a faraday cage.
>>16850319My company has gone bankrupt
>>16851471And you picked up your phone.You are now a slave again.
the moon is really uglytheoretically speaking how hard would it be to melt the moon so we can have a nice pristine one once it cools off?
>>16851267you need to hate it with the power of a thousand suns
>>16851267>annoying as fuck flickering lights all over it from refineries
The moon is artificial
>>16851374>just the moon
>>16851298We should do this. Send out 8 billion laser pointers with local date and time instructions.I'll ask the AI to do a Word MailMerge on [$EVERYONE] or something.>>16851374That makes it even easier to reprocess.
This is the single most important discovery in the entire history
>>16848509How do JCM's balls taste, suck-anon? The rest of us see his work for what it actually is, but that's not enough for you - you really need to get his hairy-scots-daddy nuts in your mouth and roll them around on your tongue. It's definitey gay and very adolescent, but you do you.
fun fact: two of those equations are due to Gauss
>>16851397>invents probability theory>discovers electromagnetism>invents numerical analysis>invents number theory
>>16851397My mom could've figured out those two
>>16851349
thoughts on Max Planck, Herbert Ives and Max Jammer saying that Einstein 1905 energy paper was garbage circular logic, even though the formula was correct?https://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/e_mc2.pdfhttps://www.scirp.org/journal/paperinformation?paperid=107596
>leI think you should pick another career option besides sucking dick.
People are becoming increasingly conscious about the dangers of long Covid, and calls for masking permanently -- even in 2025 and beyond -- are increasing.Unpaywalled: https://archive.is/IasiY(Original link: https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2025/04/covid-conscious/682252 )What can science do to help these people? Should scientists and health experts call for air filtration systems to be installed in *at least* a few strategic key areas to stop the spread?
>>16848349A drop of saliva falling directly into an open cavity during surgery is orders of magnitude more dangerous than errant particles of spit flying into the air. If you're talking to me and big globs of spit are flying from your mouth into mine then you're fucking disgusting
>>16848367>>16848349Like, do you wear surgical gloves all day? You do care about the health of people around you, don't you?
>>16847667By "medical professionals" do you mean doctors with their families and livelihoods being threatened behind the scenes by three letter's?Covid is a control device, once they get it into you it's like a shock collar for dogs caused by nanotech. Never take it and keep masking up, the next virus the spooks release will be worse.
>>16847945You know when "two more weeks" came from right?
>>16847281>those who don't care about any of thisThose are also science deniers however. Either you're all in or you're the enemy.
whats the point of /sci/ if I can just ask questions to chatgpt?
>>16844295retard
>>16848029Imagine wanting to interact with something like this lmfao and the guy earlier who was saying Wikipedia isn't "to the point", revealing to us all his preference for "that xAI edge" over simple technical language. I love chatgpt because it has offered me a super super low effort method of filtering people who otherwise might have convinced me to attend to their notions and waste valuable time and effort trying to determine whether they were dumb or just weird. Now I can simply ask people I meet their opinion on chatgpt and it's 1.00 AUC classification on whether or not their thoughts have any merit whatsoever. It's like asking, on a first date, whether a woman is a "swiftie" - it's so easy and offers so much information and there's no pretense at all; the people you are trying to filter with these questions basically line up to be filtered, not even realizing what they are admitting to. Thanks chatgpt!
>>16848029>an AI that's equal parts witty sidekick and walking encyclopedia?that's the role of fucking autists, god AI destroyed everything
I asked IA which university was the best in Math. Can AI be trusted? -Algebraic geometry area, Often considered #1: Princeton, Very close competitors: Harvard, Paris (IHÉS/École Normale) -Number theory area, Often considered #1: Princeton, Very close competitors: Harvard -PDEs & analysis area, Often considered #1: Princeton, Very close competitors: Paris (IHÉS/École Normale), Chicago, UCLA -Topology & geometry area, Often considered #1: Princeton / Berkeley (tie), Very close competitors: MIT, Stanford -Dynamical systems area, Often considered #1: Princeton, Very close competitors: Stony Brook, Paris (IHÉS/École Normale) -Combinatorics area, Often considered #1: MIT / Princeton (close), Very close competitors: — Many mathematicians simply call Princeton University “the center of the mathematical universe.”
>>16851306The best university for every single subject is always a public, state owned one that not only costs less, but actually teaches you the subject.Expensive, private universities or prestigious ones are only for daddy's nepobabies who need to network with other daddy's nepobabies.
>our equations for gravity do not work>perhaps our equations are wrong?>nah they cant be, it must be le spooky dark matter!!defend this bullshit
>>16851153>popular science targets the populaceHOLY SHIT A REVELATION
>>16851217man it must be hard to browse a science forum when you're illiterate eh?
>>16851248>calls others illiterates>confuses "popular" with "public"
>>16842506>Electric UniverseThey explain gravity as a dipole effect which is not how gravity works
>>16851071first of all calm tf down and take your meds.secondly there are plenty of physicists who think dark matter is literally a physical thing, its the WIMP theory.
You actually expect me to believe this shit?
>>16846882What the fuck is this
>>16846882In Hindi, Thanks.
Just because you don't understand it doesn't mean it's not realbut you are probably a bot so
>>16846882That's actually a clear and convincing presentation, OP. Did you make it?
>>16846882bump
So honnestly, how mind boggling: You got a number in the universe, lets say: a quadrillion than every zero after it is ofc ten times the previous amount..So..1,0•10e97 is ten times 1,0•10e96 An YTastronomer says that the observable universe is estimated 1,8 times Googolplex But the previous exponent number is ten times repeated the next so something being 1,1 Googleplex must be 1,0•10e100 + 1,0•10e10 (10•10e110) So if a Googleplex is a lot than something to the exponent 101 is ten times a Googleplex meaning which is so sickening large its not even funny..Is be thinking about that, good night. And than in that amount of space only a single blue glove with life? Those distances are so mind boggling that a star at the edge of the universe its light takes so long to reach us so wtf (sleep with a giant headache)
>>16851171But maybe it was just troll, he could troll everyone out here. Those numbers are just insane, I cant comprehend. Brain melts
>>16851173gcc
TimeIsAnIllusionTheTrackIsNotMovingOnlyThePieces OnTheTrackMove
>>16851171> GoogolplexI mean Googol ofc since googolplex is infinite
>>16851308Googol^Googol (good luck with that)
African invention
>>16850199>You vill live in ze microplastic castle and you vill be happy.No, thanks, you demonic creature. A house made from the Earth is thousand times more appealing.
>>16850206yet you just disparaged it. How curious, it's like you don't have any real beliefs
>>16832191That is engineering. There are a lot of variables that might affect the outcome, especially considering the garbage you start with is likely to vary a lot.
>>16845732Not really. Most of the money goes into the pockets of consulting companies and rich guys, not into plastic brick projects.
>>16847574>tensilemeh, these are bricks, not beams
This pic alone proves that most people lack some or all of the following:- Theory of mind- Self-reflection- The capacity to understand and model their own experienceIt blew my mind but most people don't understand the differences, similarities and relationships between the following:- Hallucination- Visualization- Visual memory- Dreaming- Drawing- Proprioception- Spatial reasoningI've seen dozens of aphantasia threads and almost every "argument" is some crippled confusing one of those things for the other or misunderstanding how they are related.Conclusion: most people have a severe mental deficiency wrt. understanding their own mind, whether or not they can visualize.
I'm 5th on the graph when it comes to apples, yet when I think of OP, I have vivid imagery of a pale, hunchback manlet who loves deepthroating BBC, making this post with bloodshot eyes, full of rage, how can this be explained?
>>16848449this retarded nigger just owned himself
>>16848424This explain many things
You triggered all the brainlets OP...The simple fact most people don't write anything or analyze themselves is all I need to know. A cluster of unconnected thoughts and facts.
>>16848424>I've seen dozens of aphantasia threads and almost every "argument" is some crippled confusing one of those things for the other or misunderstanding how they are related.Seems like the common factor is you not understanding huh?Do you also blame textbooks when you're too dumb to understand them?I'm thinking the answer is yes, which is why coping regards will have to screech I have this make believe idea of "aphantasia" as a coping mechanism for being life failures and low IQ. Watch..
If 2D creature sees a 3D object interacting with 2d space like this(ie. Bounded by his plane of existence) but it doesn't makes the object 2D. Using same logic, If a being from higher plane of existence/dimension interacts with our 3D world,we'll also see him being bounded by our dimension/plane of existence (ie. Death,birth, time and space) but it doesn't means he is a 3D being. Could this be why when higher beings/God(eg. Jesus, krishna etc) interacts with humans beings he takes birth and then dies? It could also be reason why we don't we see God as his real form because then he'll be bounded by our limits. We would a able to see him as a person, kill him, or just talk to him.
>>16849255I don't think anything other than 3 special dimensions can exist. We are 3d, but we see in 2d. A flatlander sees in 1d, and a 4d being would see in 3d.Seeing in 3d would mean you see all sides of an object simultaneously. Genuinely what the fuck does that even mean, it makes no sense, it's physically impossible. Same with seeing in 1d. You can't actually visualize this, the closest is seeing in 2d with constant vertical coloring like a bar code, but that's still 2d. The concept of zero thickness makes no physical sense.And you might say just because you can't visualize it, doesn't mean it can't exist. But what would it actually mean for their to be 4d space. And I'm not talking about spacetime, where time is a dimension but clearly treated differently, I mean full blown 4d space. Like how a flatlander would see a square as a line, we see a cub as a square (straight on, or a collection of quadrilaterals from angles). A 4d being would look at a 3d cube they way we look at a square, and see the entirety of it at the same time. And to me, that is physically impossible
>>16849405" A 4d being would look at a 3d cube they way we look at a square, and see the entirety of it at the same time. And to me, that is physically impossible"Yeah it will be physically impossible... Physically impossible for you to comprehend. Because you are You are trying to understand 4D as a 3D n ¡ g g a
>>168494054d space could exist i suppose. I reckon it doesn't though, not because of its weirdness but because 2d space and 1d space don't exist so why would 4d exist
>>16849405>>Seeing in 3d would mean you see all sides of an object simultaneously. Genuinely what the fuck does that even mean, it makes no sense, it's physically impossible.A 4D being would need a 3D retina to see in 3D obviously. Just shoot light from the 4th dimension onto a 3D object and it will hit every atom in that object and get reflected back into the 4th dimension where it eventually hits every point in the retina of the 4D being
>>16849516Uh oh anon. Atoms cannot exist in 4d
