>AI slop tweetdon't careeat shit dumbass
>>17046132the remainder is 1491413321257141805174622512557183541659374125840000111532263602382849691032672183323089490031212248424832825832709609691125255574
>>17046186Which, in laymen's terms, is not zero.
Never mind, apparently made a copy paste error, but the result is stolen.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RSA_numbers#RSA-260
This shit is stupid...Why? Waste of time..
The chinese quants are trading at close to speed of light due to secret government FPGA tech. All the western quant companies are shitting themselves and are going to pull out of the market soon. Get out while you still can.
>>17042915based.i will not be satisfied until 10% of gdp is misallocated/50% of ivy league/140+ IQ graduates are absorbed into 80 city blocks of pure jane street compute making the angels dance on the pins head.
>>17043492>>17042932>>17043875sweet summer children
Retail traders get fucked over as it is. They have to wait longer, have a larger spread, can be manipulated by big money quite easily. Now all these money hungry turbo autists are writing AI and trading bots regular people won't have a chance. But AI and bots can easily be manipulated, and that is where you guys come in.
>>17042915or perhaps they have control of both ends of the pipe
>>>/biz/
Americans be like yeah I'm majoring in Chemistry with a minor in Creative Writing
>>17042029>>17042030Minors don't mean anything
>>17044964Neither do majors, really. There's a Bachelor's degrees, there's Master's degrees, PhDs. Everything else is just elementary school, middle school, middle school+,++,+++ (all distinctions without difference)
>>17042031>What's the point?You make them take an actual proof based class and humble the engineers a little
>>17042029Good, hopefully his papers will be well written instead of being so dry its boring
Americans be like:I want to become a doctor, so now I am majoring in biology, no I want to become a lawyer so I am majoring in PolSci.
>discover a horrible congenital illness that makes a kid die a horrible death being chewed apart by the opportunistic infections>should I name this after the mechanics of the illness?>Nah.... I'm gonna name it after myself
You need first to determine rules for filling out the layers, then to actually fill the layers and than to somehow extract answer from the filled layers.https://wondrousnet.blogspot.com/2026/08/solution-to-characterisation-puzzle.html
>Scientists chase mathematical beauty in physics>They come up with thisWhat the hell?
>>17043550daily reminder that "action" is not a real thing, you can't measure it, and being "useful" for deriving equations doesn't make it real
>>17043824>ALL OF PHYSICSAll of known physics
>>17043550either the beauty is cherry picking or because what looks like a complex formula was actually an exponentially simpler result than what was the best previous theory.
>>17046165not a single metric in science is real. everything is a model for real problem solving. you thought energy J was real? kek
>>17046182then why don't we ditch scientific observation and advance science just by writing formulas in a paper?
What purpose does it even serve? There's no medical benefit to having a foreskin, only risks of developing things like phimosis band balanitis, not to mention it traps bacteria and makes your penis look and smell worse. I personally wish my parents would've just circumcised me as a baby instead of having to deal with phimosis all my life that makes having sex basically impossible and the only way to cure it is to have a painful circumcision as an adult that will take months to recover from.
>>17045990Obvious bait thread by a circumcised midwit. Enjoy your YHWH-approved cock, I guess.
>Yahudposting>on /sci/unexpected, but interesting
>>17045990
>>17045990if your penis doesn't work you're dysgenic and shouldn't be having sex anyway.
>>17045990same as this
Is noncommutative geometry a meme?
>>17044861I have been citing his work upon discovering my operator was non-communitive having Algebraic Primacy
>>17043159>>17044735>not using comic sanscan't take your shit seriously sorry
>>17041420>mathematics is the pinnacle of all human communicationthat may be so, but it's still just a shitty language trying to describe what's going on. better than nothing i guess. but filled with obfuscations and guild-like wrappings
>>17044948>better than nothing i guessWhat is your mom?
>>17041264what an original cover
>>17044123It's absolutely trivial which is why it's been independently reproduced in labs all over the world, and most scientists live forever.
>>17044143how do you reboot a brain tho
>>17044123So if this guys whole premise is that in the beginning of life cells behave optimally, but over time they start to behave abnormally doing the wrong things in the wrong places, then wouldn't solution be to stop them from behaving abnormally to start with?>googlesSo you just get chemotherapy then
>>17042999>let alone keep up with developments in the medical and associated fields.Every one of them has turned out to be a nothingburger so far. Jfl if you think you can use a yamanaka factors to remake your younger self. What exactly happens to the old skin anyway? It just sloughs off and your going self is reborn under it?
>>17042812That's just a human Speciation threshold because accessibility will either be impossible or never democratized.I hope that the elite of artificial elves will at least surgically get longer ears for the love of the meme.
Guys please helpI want to donate a small amount like a thousand dollars to foregen but I don’t like that they do animal testing and I feel like it may be a shot in the dark like it requires tens of millions of dollars to create a procedure like this and they have only raised like 3 million dollars so far in the years they have been operating. Will they probably need to do more animal testing in the future?But I want to help men so much, women stick together and have their hivemind so where is ours??Am I flushing money down The toilet or is this a good cause?
As far as I can tell foregen has never stated if they have or haven’t killed the sheep they experimented on. They just focus on the results of the experiments. That is really messed up
>>17045532>society as a collective has decided men in dresses and nail polish are womenThat fact that this is a hotly debated topic to this day in which roughly half the population stands on one side or the other on indicates your assertion is incorrect.>would still say it’s immoral to kidnap and experiment on those black children to develop a cure for my white cousins rare disease.Sure. Black children stand on a much higher point on the hierarchy than rodents. But more to my actual point: let's say you're presented with two buttons and must press one. Either your mom dies or x African orphans that you will never meet die. What is the smallest value of x that would cause you to press the "kill mom" button? I don't expect a solid answer and you don't need to give it.My point is that x is more than likely greater than 1. If it's not, then I have serious questions about your personal priorities.>What about experimenting on humans instead and skipping the animal trials entirely?Animal trials allow us to bypass extreme unforseen consequences of an experimental procedure. If it were found that the procedure unexpectedly resulted in extreme, unbearable, agony then it is much better that it happen to a rodent than to one of our own.
>>17045320Shalom rabbi
>>17045532>But society as a collective has decided men in dresses and nail polish are women.Just in some places. It's not a worldwide thing
>>17046198bro i am completely against circumcisionbut you aint regenerating that shitif anything such claims are likely to be JEWISH scams
https://github.com/anthropics/formal-math/tree/795efb86f191735c5481675763537cfb4ff37e55/percolation
>>17046115Remaining Kozma Nitzan (2024) conjectures proved.https://nitromannitol.github.io/kn1-verification-b80e9/
I don't understand Lagrangian mechanics. What is the significance of T-V? Why is it minimized or stationary?
>>17044211Anon, you didn't read carefully, it's about partial derivatives, not total. If [math] \frac{\partial L}{\partial t} = -\frac{\partial H}{\partial t} \neq 0[/math] then your system doesn't conserve energy, either.Just because the partial derivative is missing doesn't mean L is time independent, only not "directly" time-dependent ([math]L(q(t),\dot{q}(t),t)=L(q(t),\dot{q}(t))[/math]), as[eqn] \frac{\mathrm{d} L}{\mathrm{d} t} = \frac{\partial L}{\partial t} + \frac{\partial L}{\partial q} \frac{\mathrm{d} q}{\mathrm{d} t} + \frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{q}} \frac{\mathrm{d} \dot{q}}{\mathrm{d} t} = \frac{\partial L}{\partial t} + \frac{\partial L}{\partial q} \dot{q} + \frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{q}} \ddot{q} [/eqn](Obviously, if q is usually a vector and the product an inner product between two vectors)
>>17044309>Anon, you didn't read carefullyI appreciate you giving me the benefit of the doubt
>>17040919based
>>17044914yes
>>17040912>I don't understand Lagrangian mechanics. What is the significance of T-V? Why is it minimized or stationary?You take the directional derivative of an objective function and set it equal to zero.You find the critical points of a dynamic system. If it is not a dynamic system, then it is simply static optimization.Remember that these are merely necessary conditions for optimality. They are not sufficient conditions. You should use the Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman (HJB) equation, which is more useful and superior to the Euler-Lagrange equation; and is a sufficient condition for optimality. Whilst the Euler-Lagrange equation is not suitable, the HJB equation can also be used for stochastic, bang bang and singular optimal control as well.
Why are fractals catnip for midwits and charlatans? IDGI why are these retards so attracted to fractals?
>>17046023Fractal art looks cool and drawing that connection to naturally occurring fractals makes them feel meaningful. Then you introduce that it's "a math thing" without ever diving into what that math actually entails. Now you have a perfect recipe for the claim that you've discovered some secret code to unlocking the universe.The people who would bother to refute your pseudo-math will be ignored by the people who understand none of it and just want to hear a cool story. And explaining the triviality of natural fractals (ie. natural processes following the same pattern on large scales as they do on small scales) is just going to be translated as "as above so below" shit by the dumbass hippies that follow this shit.
>>17046023I wish I was an orange
Orange you going to argue the geometry, math or logic. Orange gonna Cry me a glass of OJ? >>17046023
>>17046023https://youtu.be/koDCabeh5kQ
>>17046023>>17046026surprise! it was you who was the retard all along
Perfect primes are primes with only 1 divisorusing (2^(p-1))((2^p)-1) and setting p as 0 and 1would yield 0 and 1.0 is the first even perfect prime number.1 is the only odd perfect prime number.continuing it would yield the rest of the perfect numbers, so wouldn't 0 and 1 be perfect numbers according to the equation without the exclusion? if the conjecture was if and only if it only has 1 divisor it is then perfect by definition. if the rule was set by man and not by math would that not break the entire case of mathematics being self-governing? Share your thoughts so I can feed my curiosity.
>>17043798Apologize. https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/22721/is-there-a-formula-to-calculate-the-sum-of-all-proper-divisors-of-a-number
>>170381980 is prime because ZZ/(0) is integral and that's it
>>17038289yes
this is obviously bait and you all fell for it
>>17038152yes, please
Well?
>>17045168However, you are cheating, we cannot use advanced HIGH school math here.Another way: Ed is the solution when the distance is d.E6 = 0.5 E6 + 0.5 E4 + 1E4 = 0.25 E6 + 0.5 E4 + 0.25 E2 + 1E2 = 0.25 E4 + 0.5 E2 + 0.24 E0 + 1E0 = 0=> E6 = 18
>>1704272950% they jump against75% they jump the same way87,5% they do it again93,75% they do it again100 - 93,75 = 6,25100 / 6,25 = 16
>>17042741I love rest of the owl proofs
>>17042974wrong
>>17042729yes
