https://marxist.com/the-big-bang-shoehorning-the-facts-to-fit-the-theory.htm
>>16419950>But we are convinced that the irrational side of the theory – the idealistic notion of an origin to the universe; of a moment of creation of matter, space and time; and all the absurd mathematical patch-ups that keep the theory going – all that will be forced to give way under the weight of observational evidence, and scientists will once more recognise that the universe is infinite and eternal, and that matter can neither be created nor destroyed.They're just wanking off something Engels said once, right? Pretty certain you could make a Marxist case for the big bang.
>>16420009So Marx is the reason for Mathematicians were forced to be extra autistic?
>>16451398>Pretty certain you could make a Marxist case for the big bang.pretty easy, the big bang is just a lazy atheist rewrite of the origin story told in the book of genesis. all they did was change >in the beginning God created the universe to >in the beginning the universe was created
>>16453819No I mean their thing is that history has a specific direction. What reason do they have for not wanting to apply this to the physical universe as well? Is it just purely a reaction to religion?
>>16419950Can anyone explain why Marxists don't like cosmogony? I don't get it.
What are the societal implications of IQ being the biggest factor determining the success of a group
>>16453312One drop rule. Because of some inheritance features, it takes approximately 30 - 33 generations for the curse to leave the family line, assuming no further dabbling in the dark arts.
>>16453463You know nothing faggot. After 33 Generations there is very literally next to zero DNA that you actually inherit from your ancestor. Even further than great grandparents, you actually inherit very little DNA.
>>16451650>What are the societal implications of IQ being the biggest factor determining the success of a groupFor one thing, it makes low-IQ people deny that IQ is real and important.
>>16453867nah the low iq are okay, they know they're dumb it's the subsection of midwits with grand ambitions that are the problem
>>16453839And now you understand the one drop rule.
Is it new Settled Science or something else? To me it looks like the anti-science MAGA rednecks have infiltrated the US government regulatory apparatus and have now manipulated the government into claiming, without evidence, that fluoride is neurotoxic and causes cognitive delays. Sauce:https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.cbsnews.com/amp/news/epa-fluoride-drinking-water-federal-court-ruling/
>>16439907The exact opposite is the case. One merely has to look at properly adjusted dental costs to immediately know things are awry. Also, the decisions of judges and juries are more important than your retarded ass realizes.
>>16453438I actually looked into this last year, and found a Chinese meta-study (https://ehp.niehs.nih.gov/doi/10.1289/ehp.1104912) which showed an average IQ decrease of 0.45 points in children with fluoride water concentrations ranging from 1 to 11mg/L compared to a group with <1mg/L exposure. This was a meta-study across decades, and there were also other contaminants present, like arsenic. Overall, there was a statistically significant decrease, but it's practically negligible, as most IQ tests have an error margin of 5 to 10 points. The maximum fluoride concentration set by the US EPA is 4mg/L. If your kid becomes retarded, it's probably not fluoride. Although 50mg/L concentrations does cause hippocampal degradation in rats (https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10329641/)
>>16453509>OK, I'm finally willing to admit that fluoride makes you retarded, but not very retarded so its still OKWhy can't you just own up to the fact that you have substantially reduced IQ as a result of having consumed fluoridated water for your entire life? Do you have Stockholm syndrome for your abusers?
>>16440134>>16439877It's hilarious how much the science crowd seethes when retards in the basement turn out to be correct almost every time.
>>16453957>no you must consume industrial waste>its good for you
I made a 25000% profit over the past six weeks buying some options on the Trump stock. I'm really surprised at how well it worked out considering what an obvious play it was. I figured pretty much everyone would be doing the same thing and I'd only make maybe a small profit. Instead I'm going to cash out with a six figure sum. Thank you Donald Trump
>>16453815>I made a 25000% profit over the past six weeks buying some options on the Trump stock.what are Trump stocks? on what platform do you bet?
>this thing spins>why does it spin?>because it's connected by an unbroken copper loop with something else that also spinsmake it make sense
4 Pole induction motors were the biggest mystery ever for me, i could never understand how the rotating magnetic field made a whole turn, basically reaching the starting point, while the rotor spun only half a turn.Every book of electrical engineering skipped that over, saying it was like a 2 pole motor and details were left as an exercise for the reader.Then i figured out how they worked, just saw a drawing of them, it was such a simple concept.
>>16453650>to put it into a category other than "a math thingMath things occur for precise reasons. Especially math things that are also real physical things if they are real physical things. There is a physical reason 1+1=2Do you know the physical reason an electron sticks to positive charges, or holds bonds together? Are electrons and protons real, or are they black line symbols?
>>16452244>Is a battery like filling a barrel with waterYes, both should be returned to the ocean.
>>16453679a universal brushed motor uses carbon brushes and a stator, so the energized coil is always offset.a three phase motor always has a rotating fieldand they you've got shaded pole and cap start that employ wizard magic.
>>16453242A series of underground driveshafts and U-joints
Is washing your hands after going to the bathroom a scam? I never do it and I don't find myself getting sick more than anyone else. I get the principle in theory, obviously, but it doesn't seem to actually make a difference.
>>16451700Because in high population densities. Infection and bacteria can spread faster. Nature does not like high density populations so we wash are hands to stop the spread of disease and Infection.Girls will freak out because health and sanitation are embedded into our culture. People are programed to form these habits again to stop the spread of what I mentioned above.Pathogens are real. It's not a scam
>>16451632Washing your hands after you go to the bathroom isn't that much different from washing your hands at any other point. This is because your urine is sterile and both your dick and ass are just about as clean as any other part of your skin (if anything they are cleaner than your hands simply due to being protected by clothes). If you don't blatantly get shit on your hands (eating your own poop can make you sick) then washing to "avoid getting sick" doesn't make much sense. However what it does do is three fold, firstly your hands are going to be dirty from living your life and touching things, so you need to wash them sometimes to reduce the risk of getting sick. That could be when you come home or before you eat or cook for instance but it's fairly easy to combine it with going to the bathroom. The second point is that your crotch will smell and there's risk of getting poo on your hands which you may or may not be able to detect which isn't good so you may as well wash up even if you don't do it for disease reasons. Lastly while nothing that is on your peepee is going to get you sick it can get others sick so it's best to wash up to prevent others from getting what is endemic on your skin.
>>16451777this. Your hands and face are exposed to bacteria, everything else has been under clothes since you showered this morning (you didn't??). So if anything, you should wash your hands before going to the bathroom.
>>16451700when you piss you touch your dick and you get tiny molecules from your dick on there and then you spread it about
After peeing is absolutely pointless. After taking a shit is just basic common sense because your hand came in close proximity to literal shit.
I have lyme disease and I'm concerned of passing it to someone else via kissing/sexual intercourse. Officially, the CDC says it cannot spread between humans. However, many people online claim that it CAN.I'm not sure how to approach this. Whether to inform others before sex. What to do to prevent from spreading it to whoever I'm with.Can I ask your opinion on this /sci/ and how to prevent from spreading it?
>>16451226If you don't treat it (or of it goes to the brain or brainstem) then it csn be lifelong I think
>>16451323yes, these symptoms are usually people who don't catch it in time
Hello, is there any answers to this question
>>16451209>>16451226>>16451262>>16451286Where the rubber meets the road with "long" diseases is it isn't that you have the disease anymore, you're cured, you've completely recovered, but the disease can leave behind scarring or damaged tissue that's healing weird, and that's where the pain or discomfort is coming from. This is something most doctors can't really qualify because for all intents and purposes; your body is perfectly fine, most of the time this appear as anything visible, but that unfortunately doesn't mean the pain or discomfort you're feeling isn't real. >>16448460>>16452995I'm going to say that "bug to people" diseases aren't communicable. I'm entirely basing this on the ecology of other blood-sucking insect spread diseases, but typically the disease needs to complete an important step inside the gut of an insect before it's contagious. The idea would be: the tick bites you, you get lyme disease, your body fills with 'untriggered lymes', another (or several) ticks bite you and pick up that lyme, the lyme infects and completes its' lifecycle in their body, and the lyme is now armed and ready to repeat the process.
>>16453111That's what I've heard before, that the problems were from damaged tissue rather than an infection. Still I hear that lyme stays in you for a long time after, even if it's not affecting you. And anecdotally I've talked to several people IRL who have to go back on ABX from time to time as their symptoms get worse periodically.
https://www.chemistryworld.com/news/argentinas-researchers-face-continued-catastrophe-under-javier-milei/4020343.article>The situation facing chemists and other researchers in Argentina is continuing to worsen under the country’s hard right President Javier Milei, who assumed the country’s helm in December. The sharp cuts to higher education, science budgets and professors’ salaries persist, prompting an estimated 1000 academics to take to the streets on 2 October to protest.>After less than six months in office, Milei had already demoted the country’s science ministry and frozen funding for the National Scientific and Technical Research Council (Conicet), which funds the work of about 12,000 scientists at 300 research institutions. He has also frozen budgets at the country’s public universities that conduct most of the research carried out in the country, at their 2023 levels. And now, less than a year after becoming president, he has drastically reduced funding at public universities, crippling the salaries of professors and staff there.>‘Salaries have lost about 50% of buying capacity while accumulated inflation is about 144% in one year,’ Alberto Kornblihtt, a molecular biologist and emeritus professor at the University of Buenos Aires, tells Chemistry World. The country’s annual inflation rate has been estimated at nearly 300%.>In addition, although Argentina’s Congress approved legislation to regulate the budgets of national universities with adjustments that account for inflation for current expenses, as well as salaries, Milei vetoed the measure on the evening of the 2 October demonstrations. On 9 October, Congress upheld Milei’s veto.
>>16443347Absolutely based. Now we need to get the rest of science defunded.
WHY does he have to look like a boy band singer? apart from that and jew worship, he's ok
>>16451290I wish I had his hair, fucking mirtazipine is making me bald but I need it.
>>16443347if their research is so valuable why do they need welfare gibes from the government?
Theres one type of science thats needed in any country and that is environmental and pollution research. This doesnt advance science, its just that you need people constantly testing the soil, water, food and industrial chemicals to make sure everything is within safety bounds.
(no this isn't hw, I'm just studying physics on my own)The goal is basically to find the instantaneous axis of rotation of the small discs that's on the big disc and the angular velocity around this axis.Now I suspect it's either on the edge of the small disc that's closest to the central axis or even more trivially, it' just it's own fucking axis that moves around the central axis with w1.But what's the exact theory behind finding it and calculating angular velocity around IAR?I literally went through all the textbooks I could find AND ALL OF THEM LITERALLY ONLY SHOW THAT ROLLING CYLINDER PROBLEM BUT SAY NOTHING GENERAL ABOUT THE IAR FFS.The only bit I know is that it's supposed to be in the point where the object is not moving atm.Any sources or smth? Thanks.
>>16451614Oh, okay, so you're just looking for the point on the little circle where its instantaneous velocity is zero then?Treat it as a polar coordinate problem with some distance from Disk 2's center, [math]r[/math] and some phase relative to the rotation of Disk 1, [math]\phi[/math].[math]x = R \cos \left(\omega_1 t \right) + r \cos \left(\omega_2 t + \phi \right)[/math][math]y = R \sin \left(\omega_1 t \right) + r \sin \left(\omega_2 t + \phi \right)[/math][math]\dot{x} = -\omega_1 R \sin \left(\omega_1 t \right) - \omega_2 r \sin \left(\omega_2 t + \phi \right)[/math][math]\dot{y} = \omega_1 R \cos \left(\omega_1 t \right) + \omega_2 r \cos \left(\omega_2 t + \phi \right)[/math]Use [math]\dot{x} = 0[/math] and [math]\dot{y} = 0[/math] to solve for [math]\phi[/math] and [math]r[/math][math]\omega_2 r \sin \left(\omega_2 t + \phi \right) = -\omega_1 R \sin \left(\omega_1 t \right)[/math][math]\omega_2 r \cos \left(\omega_2 t + \phi \right) = -\omega_1 R \cos \left(\omega_1 t \right)[/math][math]\tan \left(\omega_2 t + \phi \right) = \tan \left(\omega_1 t\right)[/math][math]\phi = \left(\omega_1 - \omega_2 \right) t[/math]Substituting into the first equation for [math]\phi[/math][math]\omega_2 r \sin \left(\omega_2 t + \omega_1 t - \omega_2 t \right) = -\omega_1 R \sin \left(\omega_1 t \right)[/math][math]\omega_2 r \sin \left(\omega_1 t \right) = -\omega_1 R \sin \left(\omega_1 t \right)[/math][math]\left|r\right| = \frac{\omega_1}{\omega_2} R[/math]Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>16451744>|r|=ω1/ω2*RWell that much I obtained much easier but what would be the angular velocity around IAR positioned in that point?
>>16452095>I already got that muchWell then why did you ask for help? You’ve already got r and the phase, and you’ve got the Cartesian velocities now, just convert it to an angular velocity for a fixed r.
>>16452101But would it be around that point that's r away from the center of the small disc?
>>16451744Hm interesting
>top 3 logician>top 5 mathematician>top 10 philosopher>top 10 computer scientist>top 20 physicist>top 50 linguist>top 100 diplomat>top 100 jurist>top 100 engineer>top 100 theologianWill anybody ever intellectually mog this hard again?
>be geometer>single handily buck break Number Theorists for the following 150 years
>>16450947Aristotle.......LOL! That nigga was wrong about EVERYTHING. LOL!
>>16450890.....and all without so much as an abacus, much less a "computer"/"calculator", or any "peers" aside from Newton. It's not only what these guys did that's so impressive, but how they did it without so much as a fucking lightbulb to help them read a book for which there was likely only one copy on the planet Earth that was written in Ancient Greek or Latin. Most "Modern Mathematicians" don't ever do 1/20th of what he and the other "Greats" did in their time. It's rather embarrassing, really.
>>16453221It's not the same statement though because for Spinoza it would be vacuously true while for Leibniz it actually means something.
>>16453221also >God has all the abilities and senses we dohe literally doesn't. read Spinoza God does not love or hate.
In August 2021, Swiss researchers at the University of Applied Sciences Graubünden set a world record by calculating pi to 62.8 trillion digits. They achieved this using a high-performance supercomputer in just 108 days—surpassing the previous record of 50 trillion digits from 2020. This effort, managed at the university’s Competence Center for Data Analysis, Visualization, and Simulation (DAViS), pushed computational boundaries by using vast storage and memory resources: they needed over 300 terabytes for processing and backup.>Notable natural events occured around August 2021, right when Pi was calculated to over 62 trillion digits. A striking coincidence is the eruption of the Fukutoku-Okanoba volcano near Japan on August 13, 2021. This eruption generated a massive ash plume that reached up to 16 km into the atmosphere, creating a visible floating pumice raft and even producing a new island. This eruption also caused atmospheric disturbances detected as far away as 1,000 km, impacting the ionosphere and potentially atmospheric resonance frequencies. Around this period, other volcanic activities, such as those at Aira’s Sakurajima volcano, were noted, along with unusual tectonic and atmospheric oscillations due to volcanic gases.Why do scientist keep pushing this when it's clearly unraveling the multiverse?
>>16452836If it does end, then it ends on a digit that is neither odd or even. This would be a discovery in its own right.
>>16452836Pi is transcendental, which implies it has infinite digits in its fraction. Otherwise you could represent it as a rational number.
>>16450361First, take pi to 1 digit. How the fuck is a circle 3.1? Pi is not this.Get into the habit of thinking if it's said on the side of academia, it's lies supporting tyranny.
>>16450361Pi does not exist. A perfect circle does not exist
>>16452836It would imply zfc is inconsistent since it's unlikely the proof that pi is transcendental is wrong
Rundgang um die transzendentale Säule der Singularität (circuit around the transcendental pillar of the singularity) is a song about contour integration
>>16453450Hidden /pol/ thread because that band is far right.Real Krautrock is left, ask /mu/ about details and stop spamming /sci/.
>>16453633>accuses OP of being political>mentions Varg's political affiliations out of nowheresmartest libtard
I'm a vet student and this is the subject that has been fascinating me for some time, in particular it's transmission and replication. Any good books on this subject?
Prions are so weird, we've genetically engineered mice to not produce prions, and the effects weren't substantial for overall quality of life For some reason not producing prions increases your chance of developing some neurodegenerative disorders and makes you stupid on average, but their function neurologically isn't well understood, so maybe they're neuroprotective against diseases like Parkinson's I don't know any good literature, but a lot of new studies coming out show there may be enzymatic methods to destroy prions studying how fungus deal with them, since apparently misfolded prions are more common in some species of fungi, and they've developed methods of destroying them
>>16450950there is only 1 known prion disease in humans (animals too?), and people are still trying to understand what exactly is happening with that shit.the best resource would be scientific papers.
>>16450950Self experimentation.
Mark Purdeyhe died for exposing the truth
What is the fastest way to check that I've Orthonormalized a basis? I usually have to do O(n^2) dot products of size n to verify that they are all 0. Is there a faster way, and what kind of math do I have to study to prove that there is or isn't?
>>16452539no one determines if they have an orthonormal basis this way on a computer
>>16452562I don't care and neither does OP (>>16452493). This is a mathematical proof. Fuck off to >>>/g/ if you don't like it.
>>16452555So I have to take O(n^2) dot products, and there's no transformation that will do any better. Got it. But if I'm working in a finite field, I bet there's a fast way.
>>16452565Oh, very interesting. I believe vector spaces over finite fields aren't metric spaces, no? I'm not even sure one can come up with a well-defined notion of an inner product on such spaces. Such definitions fail even for the rationals, because the space isn't complete in the topological sense. So it seems that this problem is ill-posed, because there can be no notions of orthogonality and normality in such vector spaces.
>>16452550>nigga, people still don't know the low bounds of the complexity of matrix multiplicationWe practically do, it's O(irrelevant) because the algorithms are galactic anyway.
Even on a good board there's still some serious f****** undertones you little b**** shut your f****** mouth you hater you f****** love me f**** you f****** love me
Fagit
