I wouldnt have been an incel if I choose a non STEM major. I would have met a girl in my classes or at work when I graduated like 99 percent of people.The sad part is that im not overexagurating or pretending. You SatEM majors think women will like u once u graduate and make 6 figures? Maybe they would, if they ever were in the same vanity as you, which is not gonna happen. All STEM majors not including biology are sausage fest and your only options for freinds and aquatences are other incels..
>>16917890There are women in STEM, but they are usually not there on their own volition.Usually it's because their parents or their government "encouraged" them to, which aligns with most of them being East European or Asian.In the Western world, women don't go into STEM, because they naturally don't want to. The higher the individual freedom of women is in a country, the less they will choose to study STEM.If you don't take people's freedom, they will generally not act like you want them to act. Which is why the only way for """equality""" is to either enslave mankind or to eradicate it altogether.Generally no man (m/f/d/*) will do as a socialist, communist or other kind of collectivist wants him to do, as long as he isn't forced to. Calling this "liberalism" is about as 1984 as it could possibly get, but here we are.
>>16917890There is 0 excuse that you had no chance of meeting girls in college if you bothered with socializing and other school events. You are a fag and in faggoty fashion, you blame everyone else.
>>16917890It strongly depends on the country and faculty culture. >6 figuresfrom what I heard this is now basically considered lower middle class in the states?Cost of living was ludicrous at the west cost so I can imagine it.
>>16918088Universities with a focus on technology can do that to you.At my university pretty much only Medicine had a significant number of female students.Shit sucks. You need to go out of your way to find a girl, but that's no excuse: Do due-diligence, Anon!If you are single despite not wanting to be, that's ultimately YOUR fault and your fault alone. Do something about it instead of complaining about how unfair the world is.
>>16917890nigga you're ugly, stop making excuses
>>16918327I like how you're lying despite the screenshot showing its actual response to the prompt (which I tried multiple times, getting very similar results).
>>16918329You got me. I am a bot. And the correct answer is 4.
>>16918332>You got me. I am a bot.Yeah, you probably are. Either way, anyone can paste the prompt into their ShatGPT and watch it shit the bed:>I have a square with a side length L. What's the smallest number of incongruent triangles, each with at least one side of length L, does it take to cover the entire square?
>What's the smallest number [...] does it take?It was thrown off by your poor English.
>>16918340My English is actually quite a bit better than most of your functionally illiterate, mouth-breathing EFL nation.
I've recently been starting a new semester of classes + studying for my med school entrance exams + working a job, and the sleep deprivation is really starting to get to me. It's only for the next 2-3 weeks, and so does anyone have any novel /sci/ tips on how to tackle this? (besides the obvious get more sleep/eat better)
20g creatine daily, 15+mg astaxanthin daily, 1g ALCAR daily, 100mg NACET daily, you can try megadosing melatonin through the day (1g of powder) since you wont get tired at such a high dose when exposed to daylight but ymmv. I won't elucidate the mechanism of action for these drugs, you should already be intimately well learned on bioenergetics and nrf2 and mitochondrial antioxidants. Also, zyns and long acting caffeine pills
>>16916152Study less and sleep more. You'll see better resultsStudy before sleep
>>16916152Stop treating sleep as a chore. Maintain a consistent schedule. Meditation. Self control. Honest evaluation of what you want out of life.
>>16918307Some people just have insomniaHowever OP doesnt seem to
>>16916152Cocaine. I'm not even joking. That's how lots of guys went through the same ordeal.
Which is more devoleped? Monocots or Dicots? My homie said that monocots are more devoleped than dicots. He stated some convincing points about that also. Googling it and searching in the internet said that monocots are more devoleped. But, dicots have TWO cotyledons. I'm asking this because, though monocots are more developed and evolved from dicots, then why the heck they lost all those cool features (like collenchyma, trichomes, secondary growth, palisade parenchyma and so on) that dicots had. So this is like "we are evolving but backwards". Can (de)evolution occur like this? Is it even legal? (Also, doing that fucking captcha is damn irritating.)
>>16918230Define "more developed"
Example: Humans are 'more devoleped' than microbes.Devoleped here refers who is complex and sophisticated in terms of morphology and physiology, who is efficient, who is evolutionarily advanced.
>gun powderEasy to make cause you need it to defend yourself>nuclear bombHard to make because its too destructive
Are there any actual biohack bodymods you can do?
>>16912897roids
>>16915969I mean aryans were brown indo-europeans, they could have been lactose intolerant.
>>16916010>I mean aryans were brown indo-europeans, they could have been lactose intolerant.The PIEs were milk drinking cheese eating steppe herders whose skin was lighter than the old europeans that they conquered.
Apparently there is some stuff the super rich have access to. Rich people have been buying stem cells on the black market to regrow missing digits and stuff thought it's not perfect at the moment, kind of regrows a nub of a toe for example. Ozemipic was a big one but the people using it now are early adopters and it has it's side effects but vanity is stopping. But could be great for obesity. The issue seems to be that this kind of stuff is kinda experimental and people don't want to sell a lot of it at scale as they want the scarcity. A lot of stuff about anti ageing is being mentioned but the tests, trials and applications aren't public. A lot of world leaders are in their 70's and 80's and still look kinda youngish desu so I think they could have access to something. We will probably never get any of the good stuff in our lifetimes but future generations might get access to some of the stuff billionaires are currently using. But live healthy and clean is the best option for us regular people, little bit of genetic disease lottery but water and good food is about as good as it gets for us.
>>16917560>A lot of world leaders are in their 70's and 80's and still look kinda youngishIt's called "not working a single day in your life"
how do i take good notes?
only write down what isnt in the slides
it's simple, just get into the zettelkasten deathkult
>>16917003This guy doodles.
>>16917860I never get it. When tl start a new note? When to add (as in write the note 1a behind note 1)? How do you even take notes while reading (copy-paste or make it entirey your own words)? Etc.
>>16912009Most importantly, you need the expensive LEUCHTTURM1918 booklets, and equip yourself with an expensive Parker pen.The rest is a triviality and will happen magically because you got the expensive gear.Thats all there is to note taking
did they really just develop a vaccine that offers significant protection against a wide variety of viruses and respiratory infections for a period of 3 months at a time? this is actually fucking life changing shit. it sounds too good to be true, what do you think /sci/?https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.aea1260
>>16916701>Sciencediscarded until more research is published in lower impact journals. Nature, Science and friends are CV decoration and application padding, I wouldn't trust a thing in either unless I am from the field and know the fucking guy's research personally. The amount of bullcrap is just way too damn high.
>>16916701I wish it never comes. It will become mandatory for all jobs to le increase productivity.
>>16916701no virus is immune to chlorine dioxide and no side effects
>>16916701Wow, big pharma invented a "vaccine" you have to inject every 3 months forever?The marvels of modern science!
>>16917741Schizo
>irrational numbers don't exist in reali-ACK
>>16913419>sleep is like... a continuum, dude>digital is just all ones and zeros bro
Ok smear the last piece so it goes off the page
>>16907817You've never been to a market in your entire life?
>>16913362When you think of a discrete Universe made up from discrete units ( whether they be Planck volumes or whatever ) you have to stop and consider what the boundary conditions of these units would be. Imagine zooming in on the boundary with the idea that the boundary must be discrete. Take a moment to think about it and then surely you will understand that the idea is pure nonsense. The Universe is continuous and can be divided to infinity.
>>16906989>‘Any time one looks carefully at a bubble, one is impressed with the beauty of its structure, its beautiful sphereicity glinting with the colors of the spectrum.That nigga never saw a bubble in his life
Thoughts on Dr. Ikuemuya's theories?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ypmTkT7t2vUhttps://www.youtube.com/@olusegunikuemuya4215/videos
So why do physicists say only gravity matters on cosmological scales?Electromagnetism is 10^36-10^42 times stronger and the default state of matter is being electrically charged gas.Instead they come up with ideas like dark matter and dark energy.
>>16917771Intergalactic space only has something like 1 atom per cubic metre
>>16917895That's the new world. Scientists and academia murdered the old one when they came out in favor of trooning and bioweapons. They truly deserve this timeline. Their complaints are reflections of themselves.
>>16917801>MUH AIkys
>>16918025If it merely replaces a search engine it's fine. The same basic fact can be found via traditional means, just slower.The difference between humans and monkeys is that they look at the context.
>>16917771>>169177791) Yes, your ionized gas consists of quadrillions of charges, but the system is globally quasineutral, which is what leads directly to2) Charges reorganize to dampen out electromagnetic fields. Shielding is a bitch, instead of the electric from, say, a point source scaling like [math]F_E = k\frac{q^2}{r^2}[/math]it scales more like[math]F_E = k \frac{q^2}{r^2} ( 1 + \frac{r}{\lambda_D}) e^{-\frac{r}{\lambda_D}}[/math]Once you get more than like a hundred Debye lengths away the electric field to gravitational field ratio drops from [math]10^36-10^42[/math] stronger to more like order unity, and as you go more than that your electric field is just fucking nil. And for context, the Debye length for something like interplanetary/interstellar space is maybe a few tens/hundreds of meters.
Why are mental calculations involving digits 7 & 8 so difficult to do compared to other digits?
>>16918084India and underage
Bigger numbers harder, simple as
>>16918084>"table of 8">See rightmost digit (units place)>8, 6, 4, 2, 0, 8, 6, 4, 2, 0
I've always struggled with table of 7, not so much with 8
>>16918087But 9 is one of the easiest since the sum of the numbers always add up to 9 and the digits of the multiples of 9 have a very simple pattern where the first digit increases while the second decreases.
is there any point to a computer science degree anymore anons, how fucked am i?
>>16916214What jobs are there besides programming? I doubt those would be in greater supply.
>>16916214>MUH AIkys
the chances of using your degree for employment as a software engineer are near 0 nowyou still know enough math for almost any math-heavy job though, so that's a plus. just need to expand your search
>>16916178It's fine. AI is somewhat useful but it's a meme. However lots of retards are quitting the field now. So give it a few years and it should be fine. Also companies will need to hire back coders since they fired everyone due to the AI meme.
>>16918068You will be replaced soon inshallah
Solar does not consume more energy than it produces.One ton of silicon can produce, on the low end, 750 400 watt panels, and uses about half a ton of coal and 11-13 megawatt hours of electricity in its production.A ton of coal produces about 2 megawatt hours of electricity, and the process only consumes half that amount. But rounding up, adding 13 MW hours to 2 MW hours, the entire process of creating a ton of silicon and converting them to solar panels consumes about 15 MW hours of electricity.750 panels x 400 Watts equals 300,000 Watts, or 300 Kilo Watt Hours per hour. In ten (10) hours, those panels produce 3 MW Hours of electricity, and in fifty (50) hours, they produce 15 MW Hours of electricity, meaning solar panels break even within the first 50 hours of operation. Considering the average panel produces at peak efficiency for 20 years, and can last another 20 on top of that if well maintained, there is NO FUCKING WAY manufacturing solar panels consumes more energy than they produce.Keep in mind, those are LOW estimates.
>>16905303You’re a moron.
>>16909343actually not much of an issue anymore. we just hadn't built enough of them yet.since they're stationary, even heavy, cheap, ancient tech like lead acid works just fine. hooking more of them into the grid even lets fossil fuel plants run more efficiently (they can spend more time at the top of their efficiency curve without worrying about overloading the grid).
>Solar does not consume more energy than it produces.are there really people saying that it does? And if so, why do you feel the need to respond to something so ridiculous? If someone had said>humans actually don't need food. It's a scam. You can go without eating your whole lifewould you write a long post explaining metabolism?
>>16912751>solar is a renewable and near infinite resource, coal/natural gas is notAny numbers and ratios for comparison? Sources? I'd guarantee you that you won't ever need to type or think any of this if this delusion of yours is true but go on entertain me I need a good laugh
>>16918075NTA, but unfortunately, because the Earth is finite in volume, the ground is also finite in volume, and accessible coal and oil exist only in the first dozen or so kilometers of the surface.production of these substances from continental subduction and metamorphism in the upper asthenosphere is only able to renew these materials at geological timescales. they are used at far greater rates than they are produced.each ton of silicon used to produce a solar panel is not consumed during use. broken solar panels can be reused as feedstock for new solar panels - the silicon itself never goes away. same with lithium in batteries.solar panels only run out of utility when the sun dies, and at that point we have bigger problems.i'm certain you asked this question in good faith.
When did America lose sight of its priorities?
>>16915732Americans aren't white.Europeans who are actually white, haven't been high-tech in 20 years.
Publicly appears to be losing the AI race. Largest military spenders in the world and are quite secretive about the most advanced stuff.
>>16912997no one is winning the AI race. we are all losing.
Theres consequences of filling schools with women/non-whites/foreigners>>16917569The military is literally 10-20 years behind on anything tech relatedIt's an org run by fucking boomers
>>16917569The military uses fax machines
