even chatgpt has admitted that there's no single penis size geneno, genes determine only the effectivity of one man's puberty>androgen receptor sensitivity>puberty onset timing>puberty length>other shit
>>16887671why would you think there is only one gene for penis size?
>>16888324he's probably not very smart and doesn't know what DNA actually does.So like most people, but egregious on a science and math forum.
My penis is a bit below average at between 20 and 22 cm.
>>16887671>geneHaven't you learned anything with Michael Levin?
>>16887671>OP obsessed with penis sizeYeah. Definitely a faggot.If no girl has ever told you you are big, then you're not big.If every girl has, unsolicited, commented and complimented your size, you might be big. And if you get the comment so often, you think every girl is taught to say that to their partner/boyfriend.>t. unsolicited compliment getter. Only not-quite 7" long, 5.5" girth. Use to be 7.75" long in my teens - would always hit the cervix on accident. Hitting the cervix is a top mood killer. The food equivalent of being hit in the balls it seems.>t. frequent cervix hitter. I'm better now, but also my penis has shrink an entire inch.
Has anyone ever done a study on drunk reasoning? Last night I got drunk in my f150 staring at a lake. Woke up this morning and I was using a sweater as a pillow. While an actual pillow was sitting on my passenger seat.
>>16887975I am more concerned with memory loss. Drunk reasoning is impulsive intuition but drunk memory is weird.
>>16887975Drinking does not affect reasoning. It merely lifts inhibition ... so in case of idiots that is ofc a bad idea. In case of your "pillow" I would rather suspect the second effect of drinking: inhibition of perception.
what are some barely known interpretations of quantum mechanics that actually make sense?
>>16885004go to bed, rabbi
>>16881592>imagine has a million words while literally saying nothing of substancelooks like a typical xkcd comic
>>16882074color cube netresolution: 1
>>16881592The electron is a photon with toroidal topology is the most promising one I've seen:https://fondationlouisdebroglie.org/AFLB-222/MARK.TEX2.pdfIt hasn't been worked out for baryons but it should be same basic idea.
>>16881592The Many Worlds Interpretation is the best one. The probabilities aren't meaningless there. What are you talking about? Suppose you do the Schrödinger's cat experiment in which the cat should be dead with 30% probability. It's definitely either dead or not dead in your particular world. However, if you repeat the cat experiment, you should only end up killing 30% of the cats, in your world.t. physics degree from one of the best schools, and an extremely high IQ.
How can a man be this powerful?
>>16886261The discretion of his discrete proofsVGH...I kneel
>>16886265>jewish conscience>is called a mental disorderMaybe you should uh...just not wage war on humanity, math rabbi
>>16887378He was captivated by the completeness of Aqidah (عقيدة). Which, by the way, is the proof that it's a false religion. As Baudrillard explains:>But what becomes of the divinity when it reveals itself in icons, when it is simply incarnated in images as a visible theology?>This is precisely what was feared by Iconoclasts, whose millennial quarrel is still with us today. >That deep down God never existed, even God himself was never anything but his own simulacra - from this came their urge to destroy the images. >If they could have believed that these images only obfuscated or masked the Platonic Idea of God, there would have been no reason to destroy them. >One can live with the idea of distorted truth. But their metaphysical despair came from the idea that the image didn't conceal anything at all.
>>16888223Midwitry. Religous icons don't distort or conceal God. Hawking radiation explains this.
>>16888413>Religous icons don't distort or conceal God.that's precisely his point nigga.
It's been 14 years since 4chan /sci/ posters solved a math open problem. Why has it been so long? What changed since 2011 that made 4chan users unable to solve math problems?We need to go back
>>16883336>>16884752why are you bumping so much? this is a shitty threadalso, posting interesting conversation others can reply to is more effective than bumping
>>16884815Why are you trying to defend a lack of innovation? Trying to attack the teleology of discovery in any way?
well, 4chan also discovered the sleepsort algorithmbut that was a different era. now it's full of poltards, bots and retardst.retard
>>168718632011 was a rare year, actual research here is not likely since even a hobbyist will eventually publish in some chance, rather than simply posting an interesting result.
>>16871863No one cares about this retarded combinatorics problem
what's the best theory of your own that you've ever come up with? did it pan out?
>>16873253I met a guy who had theories.He went to school and studied all the old theories.When he left unsatisfied, he started pushing his own theories.His theories were adopted.Thats what you do if you want to be taken seriously.
By "theory" I assume you mean "hypothesis"When I was in 6th grade we had a very pretty spritely woman for a science teacher and she hammered into us, in no uncertain terms, that a hypothesis was NOT a guess. She repeated this lesson over and over: that one cannot simply make random guesses or speculation about any interesting factoid, and blithely call that a "hypothesis" or "theory". It must be based in observation with as much prior established fact as possible and present a falsifiable idea that can be tested and measured and reproduced to satisfy an ultimate conclusion. The addition of too many variables creates too much uncertainty that can disqualify many ideas from any sensible testing that can justify it being called a scientific hypothesis.tldr don't just guess random shit and call it a theory
>>16873253Everything is twinkies
>>16873253You could fall to the center of the earth by holding onto your body to the end of the energy period exchange with the Earth. It happened to me here after a great sadness; I sank into myself and got knocked off the spectrum. I was falling fast towards the core (hell), and I flexed back out to the other side of the world and had a connection with others.There are people and secondary outer bodies down there.
>>16873253I have theorized that men can only have 1 of these 3 things and live a normal life:>Psychedelics>Eastern Spirituality>A womanJohn lennon got greedy and took all 3 and them he got killed. Paul McCartney only chose 2 but he fucked John. Ringo starr chose 1 and he's alive and never did any weird shit.
>blessed with insane intelligence>wastes it all on a board game
>>16887876Not an official rating, you'd be like 1200 at best.
>>16884002>>16886587Nabokov wrote a whole book about it. It's called the Defense. Rather grim book though.
Spearman's law of diminishing returns or smthn
>>16887877>Ackshually you need this autistic language to be good>Huh what, a site endorsed by grandmasters and official chess organizations says you're good?>Lol naw you need to do this one that requires my faggy bookkeeping notation for record keeping>In fact you'd be lower on this >What you MEAN chess.com elo is consistent with master and grandmaster elos from my official games>REEEEEEELmao some nuclear grade cope.
>>16884002>Turn-based>1 move per turn (unless you count castling as 2, and even that can only be done once)>Perfect information>No RNGThere are far more complex strategy games out there.
found this on zenodohttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18020410some guy wrote 100 pages proving you cant algorithmically verify consciousness for any system. says it reduces to the halting problem so its actually impossible not just hardhas like 5 different proofs including construction algorithms that supposedly break any proposed verifier. also claims it works for literally every consciousness theory not just specific onesmath looks formal but idk if its sound. anyone here actually understand computability theory enough to check if this is legit or schizo?seems like a big deal if real but also could just be missing something obvious
>>16877416prove?why would i do that? you may as well ask me to prove unicorns since you are at it>>16877422>if you're consciousand you fucked up already
>whole thread is anon's debating pre-kantian philosophylovely
>>16886580>NOOO I READ STUFF IN A BOOK THEREFORE YOU'RE NOT ALLOWED TO TALK ABOUT STUFF AND TRYING TO REASON IT OUT YOURSELVES!!! YOU HAVE TO JUST ACCEPT THE STUFF THAT WAS ALREADY WRITTEN DOWN LIKE I DID!!!
>>16877292I'm going to start calling every single tranny sentiment I see schizo. You are schizo, now.
>>16877287He didn't need 100 pages for that, it would trivially follow from Rice's theorem assuming consciousness is a non-trivial property (i.e. not all programs possess it or don't possess it) of a computer program. Of course, this whole thing would assume that consciousness falls into a mathematical or computational framework at all (which I think is true, but it's a metaphysical assumption). The author mentions Rice's theorem in the abstract, but confuses it for a statement about physical systems and lookup tables? Not a good sign, along with the lack of LaTex.More generally, reducing something to the halting problem doesn't actually mean you have shown it is impossible to verify. Halting itself is an example of this: you actually can easily verify that the program print("Hello world") halts, even though the halting problem is undecidable. The important thing is that for a general program, you can't *necessarily* verify that it will halt or not (in finite time). There do exist programs that can be verified to halt (e.g. print statement, matrix multiplies) or not halt (e.g. while True do x). But these don't cover all programs!Philosophically, it seems obvious we can only verify our own conscious experience (unless you're an eliminativist!) and that we simply have to infer it in others from behavior, shared phylogeny, etc. If an AI system that is not trained on human data (e.g. ancestor simulations) independently describes the hard problem of consciousness, we could probably be safe in inferring it is conscious.
https://github.com/pkcode94/deepseekx/tree/master/deepseekxMathematical Formalization of the Unified Multi-Head Transformer LSTM Cell1. Core LSTM Update$$\begin{aligned} \mathbf{i}_t &= \sigma(\mathbf{W}_i [\mathbf{x}_t, \mathbf{h}_{t-1}] + \mathbf{b}_i) \\ \mathbf{f}_t &= \sigma(\mathbf{W}_f [\mathbf{x}_t, \mathbf{h}_{t-1}] + \mathbf{b}_f) \\ \mathbf{g}_t &= \tanh(\mathbf{W}_g [\mathbf{x}_t, \mathbf{h}_{t-1}] + \mathbf{b}_g) \\ \mathbf{o}_t &= \sigma(\mathbf{W}_o [\mathbf{x}_t, \mathbf{h}_{t-1}] + \mathbf{b}_o) \\ \mathbf{c}_t &= \mathbf{f}_t \odot \mathbf{c}_{t-1} + \mathbf{i}_t \odot \mathbf{g}_t \\ \mathbf{h}_{lstm, t} &= \mathbf{o}_t \odot \tanh(\mathbf{c}_t) \end{aligned}$$2. Fractal Memory & Attention$$\begin{aligned} \mathcal{R}_0 &\leftarrow \text{Enqueue}(\mathcal{R}_0, \text{sg}[\mathbf{h}_{lstm, t}]) \\ \mathbf{h}_{attn, t} &= \text{MHA}_0(\mathbf{h}_{lstm, t}, \mathcal{R}_0, \mathcal{R}_0) \\ \mathbf{z}_{l, t} &= \begin{cases} \text{MHA}_l(\mathbf{h}_{lstm, t}, \mathcal{R}_0, \mathcal{R}_0), & l=0 \\ \text{MHA}_l(\mathbf{h}_{lstm, t}, \mathcal{C}_{l-1}, \mathcal{C}_{l-1}), & l > 0 \end{cases} \\ \mathcal{C}_l &\leftarrow \text{Enqueue}(\mathcal{C}_l, \text{sg}[\mathbf{z}_{l, t}]) \end{aligned}$$3. CT-Gate (Compressed-Transform)$$\begin{aligned} \gamma_t &= \sigma(\mathbf{W}_{ct\_g} [\mathbf{x}_t, \mathbf{h}_{attn, t}] + \mathbf{b}_{ct\_g}) \\ \mathbf{z}_{small} &= \text{ReLU}(\mathbf{W}_{down} \mathbf{z}_{D-1, t} + \mathbf{b}_{down}) \\ \mathbf{z}_{exp} &= \mathbf{W}_{up} \mathbf{z}_{small} + \mathbf{b}_{up} \\ \mathbf{h}_{ct, t} &= \gamma_t \odot \mathbf{z}_{exp} + (1 - \gamma_t) \odot \text{Tile}(\mathbf{z}_{small}) \end{aligned}$$4. Final Unified Ensemble$$\mathbf{h}_t = \frac{1}{3+D} \left( \mathbf{h}_{lstm, t} + \mathbf{h}_{attn, t} + \mathbf{h}_{ct, t} + \sum_{l=0}^{D-1} \mathbf{z}_{l, t} \right)$$
Thats as much as i can post without the janitors deleting all my posts for "flooding" or whatever other dogshit reason they want to adopt.
>>16888303Thank you for your in depth response, actually carrying the board fr fr no cap senpai (not OP)
>>16888302>d fr fr no cap senpai (not OP)>>16888301>>16888300give me a sec before i read your response. i am using it to categorize radiometric data into anomalies right now.
>>16888302fair response. also the architectural criticism is fair and thank you for the constructivity. i will work on it.
>>16888303https://github.com/pkcode94/deepseekxbtw heres the github.
Is there a parallel universe where I still have my hair?
Your hair is probably on someone's balls already The way of the universe
I'm so fukkin tired bros, constant telogen effluvium due to hypothyroidism due to antipsychotics killing my thyroid. My levels are good, but it still falls out every time I run my hands through it. Minoxidil doesn't put a dent in it and fin fucks my guts up.They say reducing stress can help stop it, but my primary stress is my hair falling out every time I take a shower.Thanks for reading my blog.
>>16886626special pleading your mutli verse bullshit muzzie?
>>16886629There's a parallel universe where it is possible to prove parallel universes exist.
>>16887121I will make it priority for you to get raped by your rapist counterpart, which I assume is just you with a different shirt on that day.
arxiv.org/abs/2106.05181
>Cheng Qiandropped
And it's just getting worse. PhD sucks fucking ass, science sucks fucking ass. Any new science you try to shit up? All convoluted, 12 dimensional shit that nobody understands. Want to invent new device? Fuck you, everything works perfectly fine on silicon and whatever shit you "invent" is useless, way worse, expensive, defective and non sustainable. Any reasonable research requires supercomputers and billiar dollar company investment. Meanwhile 100 years ago: Oh I shine light on some piece of metal and measure some current, nobel prize! Oh I spin some copper wire around a piece of iron, wow I invented electromagnetism and im fucking millionaire (billionaire in current dollary-doos).Whats the fucking point of science then?Science peaked at transistors and nukes. Now its pure bullshit.
I get paid to study shit that's been known for 200 years. I'm chillin' lol, beats making 10 dollars an hour from 9-5.
>>16888249Congratulations you found out that modern science is fucking useless>>16888259Your kind should and will be culled.
>>16888286>>16888249>they said, broadcasting their retarded thoughts using modern semiconductor devices beyond their comprehension
the most influential and well known teacher in the world, probably ever.hundreds of millions of men and women are able to pursue STEM careers and get engineering degrees because of him Say something nice
>>16886611>10 million subs>Hundreds of millions watch Kek. Buy ad. You're not even half as good as professor Dave.
>>16886619>professor Dave.I liked him more when he just helped me with my assignments and studying and less when he became le professional debunker redditor lord
>>16886611We need more chemistry threads, specifically catering to materials science. Screw Professor Dave. He seems more like a social science teacher than a science teacher.
>>16886674>We need more chemistry threadsEspecially about picrel
So I guess im just dumb but I was reading about what a "calorie" is, like in food, and it brought me to Carbohydrates and every Wikipedia article kept talking about "energy" in food and I dont know what they mean by "energy" and it talks about "1 kilocalorie is 4184 joules" and I just dont get it how can you even measure energy of a hamburger or a human body?
>>16886214It's because every time people ask a question to try and learn something some asshat like you comes along to make them feel bad for not already knowing what they're trying to know, and then some other asshat comes along to accuse anyone who does answer such questions of being an arrogant know it all. The answer to your question "what the ever loving fuck are people being taught in grade school now" is: how to behave like women.
>>16881567Fun factThe calorie is based on the Energy Balance Model or EBM and it's a broken model that ignores the laws of physics.A more accurate model you can search papers for was created by real physicists and is the mass balance model where a differential equation can model perfectly exactly how much weight you will lose or gain based on which foods you intake that the body converts to mass. This model explains why some meme diets who are high in calories still result in weight loss.
>>16887451BULLSHIT almost all of those threads have willfully stupid OP's. who argue and nit pick shit they were asking about. fighting against EVERY response. OP is either a complete retard or a troll.
>>16881567Mr. Wizard, a popular science show for kids, had an episode where he literally burns food and measures the energy to explain calories. See in the 20th century we used mass media to teach kids science. The Discovery channel and The Learning Channel were wall to wall documentaries mostly about nature and science. You could put those channels on a TV and fall asleep to relaxing nature videos and a soothing narrator telling you about science and biology. The world was better then, kids were educated and not turned into Tik Tok addicts. You were robbed of a life of value anon, you should have never needed ask this question. You have been betrayed and left to rot like a pig in the sun. Many such cases. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vv_aqytquPchttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=czMb2KwEUbw
>>16887549god I miss the old TLC and discovery.
Are there any good science podcasts, ideally with some nice pleasant voices to listen to? I used to listen to the old Science Friday with Ira Flatow back in the day, great stuff, well before the whole world got so hyper politicized. Any good podcasts that are just like, fuckin particles and space and chemistry and fossils and shit, and not like "here's how mongolian gender stereotypes affect blah blah" ?
>>16885891Andrew Huberman is unironically really good. Initially he discusses a lot of bread and butter things from his field that he basically teaches like a crash course in basic neurology, neuroscience and metabolism. Then for a while he dabbles with topics he's not really specialized in, with some interesting discussions but also some really glaring misinterpretations. Eventually he settles in a really perfect balance between being informative yet still reserved about the subject matter. At heart he is a genuine researcher and it shows in how well he's adapted to his role and his responsibility to convey specialist data in a digestible format.
The New Scientist put out a weekly podcast called "The world, the universe and us". It's a summary of some of the science stories of the week. It's very broad, but the stories they focus on tend to be surprisingly interesting. They speak to actual experts, rather than just winging it. And usual hosts are quite nice to listen to.
I used to listen to.. sigh.. "The Skeptic's Guide to the Universe". Honestly it was pretty comfy for a long time because it was just 3 brothers with distinct personalities (the accomplished elder neurosurgeon, the super autistic nerdy details guy, and the dumb joey from friends who wants to learn guy) plus random girl. I stopped around the time that, you know, everything went to shit. Specifically their girl got into a #METOO fight with Richard Dawkins and the whole thing became obnoxious idpol shit like everything else did.and I don't even care about the -ism of skepticism anymore, material determinism is lame and the past decade has shown the ineffable failure and collapse of trust in the scientific "community". i've had just about enough incessant "uhakshooally"s as I ever need anymore in my life. i'm done hearing that i'm not allowed to trust my own senses and shared cultural experiences anymore. i'd say i'd rely on scientific methodology when i want to find out if a drug works to treat a disease but you can't even do THAT anymore, can you? it's all a load of fuck
>>16885985I doubt that's true.
>>16885891Big Picture Science is good and has been around for years and they dont get bogged framing everything with woke speak like some podcasts.
