>>16909047>This is because high-IQ people are more productive and more creativethe midwits yes. the highest iq and highest earners are mostly neets here's how high IQ rich people produce:>I have an app idea >cool I know someone who can market it>cool my people will deliver a prototype in 2 weeks. we have a dealhere's how midwits produce:>I have to use these 20 productivity apps to make my boss happy! whatever it takes even unpaid overtime!
>>16944486kek wrong pic
>>16909239Yep. But we needed to lock it all down!
>>16925571>that one dot counted as white with less then 25 percent european ancestrywhat?
>>16909042yeah thats not surprising at all
It would be nice to have a gizzard.https://youtu.be/wSutYGurh1I
>>16936407It wasn’t. The common ancestors of birds with the other theropod dinos were all small, agile creatures that had some arboreal capacity. They lived in the Jurassic, long, long before the first T-Rex hatched out of its egg.
>>16937150lol
>>16937150
>>16937002hm that looks ethical...
china landed on the moon 2 years ago and nobody cares
>>16931708Why does the US govt keep importing and feeding ghaniansAlmost like you have a massive number of jews infesting your govt
>>16945776>They just happened to be in that region of the world when they did itSo they couldn't do in europe?
>>16945789And yet, we still own your ass...Curious....
>>16931405Oh they put a probe on a rock. Big deal, we do that every other week.
>>16931405probably because china is a lying sack of shit or something like that
then who the FUCK is in control?
>>16944380https://youtu.be/E1Jsdu0S6mw
>>16934602https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OKnpPCQyUec
>>16944380nice
>>16934580I worked out the observer would see the picture change and continue past any god's timespan.
>>16934580This guy >>16934588
Why does the brain choose specific i.e. bad words to scream them uncontrollably?
>>16923469I don't like people who blindly follow shit like this or occam's razor because they're not mentally capable of constructing a theory of mind and comprehending how it's possible for someone to tell a lie because it's fucking simpler to do
>>16923471any habit becomes involuntary once you do it enough
>>16923471>coprolalia just because jews or blacks are cursedMore like justice-loving-lalia, more like LOGOS.
>>16945429retard bot.
>>16918979people are retarded as usual
Gamer Wrist editionUnfriendly reminder:>DO NOT GIVE ADVICE>DO NOT FEED THE NURSOIDS>DO NOT ENGAGE WITH PREMEDSand most importantly>DO NOT REPLY TO PSYCH POSTERS
>>16946430lol good luck. Housing sucks there.
>>16946910there are no dentists here
>>16947143One of the few redeeming factors about /med/. FUCK tooth jews
>>16946921Sour grapes. Just let me have my moment, bro.
>>16947143>>16947333shid. I'm still looking for anyone who had personal experience with this type of lesion.
This is Paracelsus, a hermetic alchemist, or proto chemist; also the greatest natural physician of his day, and a father of mineral medicinals. He believed he could produce a slave creation, or a familiar of sorts—the Homunculus—by ejaculating into a chicken egg, or worse.— ‘That the sperm of a man be putrefied by itself in a sealed cucurbit for forty days with the highest degree of putrefaction in a horse's womb ["venter equinus", meaning "warm, fermenting horse dung"], or at least so long that it comes to life and moves itself, and stirs, which is easily observed. After this time, it will look somewhat like a man, but transparent, without a body. If, after this, it be fed wisely with the Arcanum of human blood, and be nourished for up to forty weeks, and be kept in the even heat of the horse's womb, a living human child grows therefrom, with all its members like another child, which is born of a woman, but much smaller.’ 328–329The original coomer, if you will.
>>16901903He might have just been a disgusting person.
science was pure before industrialism (aka the despotic anglo-judaic world order) sucked all the soul and fun out of it.
>>16902080>The average 15 year old knows more about medicine, geology, anthropology, astronomy, and any basic science today,Progress-mongers and their endless delusions make me laugh.
Sick
>>16901903just because ok
Redpill me on Angela Collier
>>16944932Don't be fooled by make up. She's an uggo, that's why she's an actual nerd.
>>16939306She needs smug correction
>>16946856proof?
>>16946851Sorry Levi, Nobody cares.
>>16939545relative of Jacob?
Science is a few things:1. Knowledge (this is where the word comes from) to be acquired and information that can be applied (technology, chemistry, cooking, etc, are all applied sciences)2. The method of “fuck around and find out” (causality/repeatability as it is - with the additional nuances of the reproducibility crisis - each stroke of a paint brush won’t be exactly the same - things like the big bang already happened - etc) which is the bare minimum of science - “remember kids, the only real difference between proper science and fucking around is writing is down”3. The scientific community and overall consensus, peer review, scientific dogma (consider that half of the scientific community can’t even tell you what a woman is - it is perhaps a borderline cult at present), etc, that ostracizes dissent and divergent thinking 4. Physics, nature, reality, as it is - Einstein himself did not see science as merely something to apply in the one sided sense; he saw it as a background symphony, playing its cosmic tune independently of our ability to listen in; it lies in wait for all time; “the music of the spheres”; he directly compared it to Mozart “locating” already existent beauty, or harmony, while people like Beethoven merely constructed their music Any questions?
I like wheels Vroooom
>>16937550Define "random."
>>16939887Family Guy
>>16935316>Einstein music analogywhat the fuck is that supposed to mean?musical pleasure is based on a mixture of learned cultural schemata and evolutionary response to cycles of consonance and dissonance in auditory stimulus as an analogy for tension and release in other expressions of consciousness, such as storytelling or sex. There is nothing more objectively true about this for Mozart's music than Beethoven's. It's just a matter of personal preferencethe rest of the shit you typed out was even dumber than that. go sit in a corner and think about your life
>>16935316Good to know.
I would have been cool to sit there on the grass having picnick, watching the rocket vehicle drive over you
I wanted to see it take off
>>16947540With a gf or family, yes
"No, a satellite does not always receive solar energy from the sun. While most satellites use solar panels, they frequently pass through Earth's shadow—known as an eclipse—blocking sunlight for roughly 45 minutes of a typical 90-minute orbit. During these periods, satellites rely on rechargeable batteries to continue functioning."
>>16944461There are several trivial orbits where sun is shining continuously or nearly continuously.
>>16944461I think you should upgrade your AI plan anon, it's too dumb
>>16944461genuine midwit sighting
>>169444611. As others have mentioned, you can achieve orbits where the sun is always in line of sight with your panels.2. The fact that you needed an LLM to explain that satellites on the night side of Earth wouldn't receive sunlight is... telling.3. Even ignoring the prior two points, this is nothing but an "um, ackchually" tier gotcha in response to a hyperbolic piece of marketing wank on his profile's banner. If some box meal said it was jam-packed with flavor would you feel it necessary to clarify that "flavor" is an abstract concept and the idea of "packing" it into something is a category error?I don't even like Musk. But this is exceptionally retarded.
>>16944461There's plenty to criticize Musk for, this is just retarded.
60 to 50 years ago they were talking about a Malthusian collapse and overpopulation such that many would die, especially after the baby boom. It ended up being the case that all the basedentists saying that were using linear thinking, believing that the population will just keep increasing because that's all they knew from that point. Now they are saying we will be underpopulated due to TFR collapse. But if TFR collapse is all you've seen from this point, why should we expect it to continue going down, like how they expected population to only increase in the 60's and 70's? Wouldn't it be the same linear fake and gay thinking?
>>16947329When was the last time you looked at Mormon birthrates in the US, especially with non-immigrant Mormons?
1.5 TFR is already catastrophic economy wrecking total fuckfest but basedentist retards don't know how economy or society work
>>16946574Of course it is; it would only be a problem if the fertility rate dropped "too" low and mostly because there would be too many elderly people dragging down the economy and not enough younger people to balance it out.Negative birthrate isn't really a problem because sooner or later it'll raise back up as the elders kick the bucket, national economy stabilises itself and quality of life improves.
>>16946574It doesn't matter really, society will adapt either way. It always does.
>>16947422The consumerist financial debt economy society? We all know how it works, it's a ponzi scheme. If you advocate for more births you just want to keep the ponzi going.
Imagine being an 18 year old in 1969. Man has set foot on the moon. The first satellite was only launched 12 years earlier. >Wow, I wonder what incredible advances we will have in 60 years! This is just the beginningImagine the disappointment
>>16947112I think we are going forward, people are just becoming more comfortable expressing their retardation. Which is good because then they can learn.
>>16945153>Wow, I wonder what incredible advances we will have in 60 years!Probes leaving the solar system after visiting every planet, landing on Venus, Mars, Titan, asteroids, comets, penetrating the atmosphere of Jupiter, rovers on Mars--with onethat even had a helicopter drone--and space based telescopes seeing to the edge of the universe and finding many, many exoplanets? You're a fucking casual.
>>16945212>this 50 year gap may not even be all that significant.There is no "50 year gap". It became cheaper, easier and more practical to explore using machines. Picrel.>they're the reason why progress has been made in Space in the 21st century (mostly SpaceX though)Again, picrel. I love AI because it's never been easier to shut down some blowhard lecturing us about his fragmented knowledge base.
>>16945311Reading is terrible if you aren't taught critical thinking to go with it. Theres a reason the powers to be push it so hard with nothing to go with it, they want you to understand what the "experts" think and nothing more. Basically the Thomas Jefferson saying about newspaper readers
I'm so tired of this "huurr we went to moon 100 years ago but done nothing cool since" shit. Ugh.
I can't even get to the actual first order logic part. Am I retarded?
>>16946681it hurts to find out like this anon...
>>16946681yes
>>16946609Why does anyone need to know this stuff?First order logic in programming. (Are the lights on in the house true/false? True = yes ; false =no) true- implies someone home false implies no one is home.All you’re doing is using math to mesure what’s going on in the world. You do this in your head daily. Now all you need to do is write the usual logic you make in your head on the daily.Bread is low. I need to buy more breadMathematically x(is bread) k=(number of brea slices) then we add whatever to calculate or measure how that sequence happens to buy bread.Vola… a powerful computation .
>>16946609No. I tried a myriad of logic books and all of them were confusing as fuck. None of them were to the point. I didn't actually learn logic until I read mathematical logic by Ebbinghaus, which is clear, to the point, and pedantic. I highly recommend it
>>16946609No, this book's approach is laughably bad. Even though "semantic tableaux" are pretty close to how people actually reason things out IRL. You'd be better off/less confusing just making truth tables>>16947479This book is a lot better
They're having sex up there, aren't they?
>>16946970Do you think the black guy will do the moonwalk when they land?
>>16946970They are peeing into each other's mouths.
>>16947494They are not even landing just flying past the moon and coming back lol.
>>16947513NASA is fearmongering over a possible failure. I think the public's thoughts on them could swing quantum variables off some possible failures.
