Do transgender individuals (they are people too) that are M-T-F, have less than ideal testosterone prior to their transition? Has there been a study on this?
>>16553055i dont know i want to rub a trans girls penis
>>16553055Latinx shemales are vicious they could probably beat up most western men, so no.
>>16554099but that doesnt that mean then they have too much test so they have too much estrogen?
>>16553685>bisexualAka gay>am attracted to trans girlsAka gay
>>16553055eee faggots!
the unexplained, the un-understood, this thread is about how little we know.what you got /sci/
>>16555755Yes but virtual particle aren't physically real, hence the name, but they make for a good visualisation device. There is an interaction with quantum fields around a blackhole, and that is what Hawking calculated, but the result is thermal radiation, not a matter/anti-matter particle.
>>16555758>matter/anti-matter particle.matter/anti-matter interaction results in photons, net plus. virtual particle pairs net zero on interaction no?
>>16555762The pop-sci explanation of Hawking Radiation is that one of the two particles produced falls into the blackhole while the other escapes (taking some of the blackholes mass with it).
>>16555765Yeah I never understood that bit, supposedly a "normal" particle would escape if it's on the outside of the boundary and the "opposite" particle would fall in, but that would need to be some kind of negative mass particle of sorts and would have to net 0 on interaction with anything in the black hole, this way carrying mass away from it. weird, never really understood the nature of these exact particles, they can't be matter/antimatter and they have to be real not "imaginary".
>>16555747erm idk all i know is that it has a doughnut shape
Talk mathsFormerly >>16515464
>>16538030> Firedberg, Insel, and Spence> 250,67€Jesus christ somebody needs to take the CEO and executives of pearson publishing and beat them with a hammer.
>Insel
>>16555518that reminds me of some website pages filled with the most abominable irrational number approximations
that's not true
>>16555518
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41612-020-00143-wFirst sentence in the paper:"The Antarctic continent has not warmed in the last seven decades"
>>16555469"Our results suggest that the high elevation of the present AIS (Antarctic ice sheet) plays asignificant role in decreasing the susceptibility of the Antarctic continent to CO2-forced warming."
>>16555469>now lets show how that means global warming is actually worse ö
>>16555469I doubt there are nothing of fallaciously pseudoscietific on it!
THE.SCIENCE.IS.SETTLED.Fucking retard
I'm learning logic. I had a discussion on another board. Can someone who knows a lot about logic comment on this discussion? Specifically how I (the OP), the Moldovan anon, and another Swede discussed how the fallacy can be either denying the antecedent or affirming the consequent. Yesterday I felt like I understood it but looking at it again today I'm confused.>>>/pol/494305518https://archived.moe/bant/thread/21913276/https://archived.moe/bant/thread/21913276/#21913359https://archived.moe/bant/thread/21913276/#21916009It seemed to make sense that it could be either denying the antecedent or affirming the consequent. This made me wonder if denying the antecedent can always be rephrased as affirming the consequent and vice versa. But when I was going over the reasoning again to figure out if that's the case I got confused.
>>16548964That's undoubtedly a delicious salad.In Europe, most persons eat rice with a spoon.In East Asia, most persons eat rice with chopsticks.In the Russian region which borders the NE-most province of China, most persons eat salad with a... miniature m*n*r*h?
>>16550410Still haven't addressed the topic
>>16550318Are those books better than this book?https://forallx.openlogicproject.org/html/
S1: If P, then Q.S2: If not Q, then not P.S1 <==> S2S3: If Q, then P.S4: If not P, then not Q.S3 <==> S4
affirming the consequent:P implies Qtherefore, Q implies Pdenying the antecedent:P implies Qtherefore, not P implies not Q"Q implies P" and "not P implies not Q" are logically equivalent statements.
Do this count as a scientific game or is it just pure hogwash pretending to understand how evolution work?
>>16555594the original announcement and demo were much more serious in tone. they still generated lots of interestpeople were shocked when the game turned out to be a cartoony joke instead of a kinda grim alien life simulator. there was a big stink about it
>>16555662Redditor faggots think science stopped 30 years ago and have no idea that almost every study done since states that there is basically no evidence for large evolutionary changes and that we almost certainly didn't evolve from apes. The exact same thing happens with studies done on IQ and socioeconomics. Turns out everything they preached in the 80s and 90s was false and that it almost all comes down to genetics which can largely be broken down on broad racial lines.
>>16555722can you link or provide the title of one of such studies that states "there is basically no evidence for large evolutionary changes"i am willing to be open minded if you can back up your claim
>>16555472It's very scientific, don't you remember picking your penis size in the gene editor? You did pick large like everyone else right?
>>16555472Spore makes me depressed because I followed it from day 0, watching their grainy low-res recording of a projector in a conference room. Whatever alpha they demonstrated had underwater cities/animals and a brain as a separate body part. So you could stay in the creature stage or even just stay a fish if you wanted, like there were multiple multiple paths of play beyond "eat meat or dance."
As well all know math is extremely broad, nevertheless as the saying goes "Jack of all trades, master of none" what fields would you choose to become very advanced in, and why?As a side question what would you say are the fields that are there just to bait midwits into a fruitless rabbit hole?
Basically any field that has lots of integers and algorithms. If the field is just words and variables that means it's a fruitless rabbit hole.
18 January ReutersDC — The Biden administration today issued a new executive order banning ZFC and set-theoretic foundations from mathematics within the continental USA and Hawaii. The measure, which is part of a larger effort to improve the foundations of science, comes as a relief to many mathematicians, who in this day and age prefer memory-safe languages such as HoTT.
fortunately, computers are rendered unusable, averting WW4, but cause WW3
>>16554651Alaska: "Nothing good ever happens here...*sigh*"
Who was in the right?
>>16554860A thoughtful scientist vs. a smug redditor. The chances that the latter is correct are almost precisely zero.
>>16555128that's what I said, you could only go back to an alternate timeline which you were never part of, but timeline which somehow worked out just the same, with or without you in it. which is a serious mindfuck.let alone the whole "ok but where tho" since you only mention the time not place. in the past, but WHERE? that should be a physical space like here but somewhere/when else.
Dave needs to hang.
>>16554860dave is a retard and sabine is a grifter they're both wrong
>>16554936This is somehow a well-informed yet massively retarded opinion at the same time. Many trvkes mixed together with crackpot nonsense. I’m impressed.
"Why?" I mean, why not?(I have no background in healthcare or any field related to science btw)Rate muh formula and post your score(HBA1C in mmol/mol + BMI) / (total cholesterol / HDL)>mine(34+23)/4.43= 12.9
>>16552911all you need is the golden ratio, silver ratio, platinum ratio, bronze ratio, brass ratio
>>16552918whats the perfect ratio of all those ratios though?
>>16552985there's a bunch
>>16552911Ratio of her nipples inside my mouth to outside = 2:0
>>16552911lmao
Would women still need to wear bras in zero-gravity?
>>16546790we gonna know 100 percent now
>>16543191What the fuck is it bouncing off of? Photons?
>>16543051It depends, boobas no, milkers yes.
>>16546790what site is this
Does it happen because of decoherence, observation, or some deeper interpretation of quantum mechanics I’m not parsing correctly? Copenhagen? MWI? Pilot wave? What’s the most no-nonsense way to frame it?
>>16554459It happens because is quantized. All or nothing, whole quanta or no quanta, no fractions. It can't be half here and the other half there. Simple as.You should be asking why it goes from right to left. Is it a probability distribution or that is just how a position evolves in time?
>>16554477>what are fields?>what are lagrangians?>what is literally all of thermodynamics/statmech?>what is all physics?Anon, the list of non-physical things we use to accurately predict the behavior of complex physical systems could fill a textbook, or a few thousand.Wave functions are just another mathematical formalism that's useful for predicting the behavior of a physical system; and it probably *does* have some deeper meaning to it in-so-far as *why* it works so well, but we don't completely know what that is yet.
>>16554482>If you dwell too long on exactly what an observer is, you'll probably start muttering to yourself.isn't it any particle which isn't entangled with the system? when a photon interacts with the entangled system the photon itself is the observer, acts like the observer.maybe observer is not the best word. interactor? anything that isn't entangled with the system?
>>16555208>I mean, I wasn't actually watching the particle the entire time.>A scientist has to eat lunch, right?>But when I came back, the particle had climbed a really big hill.>I couldn't do that, especially after lunch.>Obviously, it teleported.
It seems like the universe's expansion is not accelerating but an illusion caused by cosmic voids. Cold dark matter is incredibly elusive, maybe axioms, primitive black holes, or entropic, but it seems like it is an artifact of our models. How can we develop a new cosmos theory based on evidence when the evidence is so elusive to us?
How do galaxy brains even exist like like?If you scanned his brain, would he have more memory registers then the normal six?
>>16555634This task relies on heuristics. Does he really comb through a mental library of 360,000 words? Does he take the letters he has and generate every possible copmbination to see which are valid words? No. He has developed a filter that allows him to make maximum likelihood guesses about valid words quickly, like a LLM does.
>>16555639Extreme cope.
>>16555634>memorizing 6,126 words a day for 63 days straightyou have no idea if he actually memorized all those words. there are systems to memorize things and this autist is probably using some tricks.
>>16555003holy shit you could be the next autistic super soldier. go enlist in your country's military right now they need your mental prowess
>>16554949if he was truly intelligent he wouldnt be wasting his life on pointless shit like this
What do you think the average IQ of this group is, huh?
>>16555139100. Its normally distributed
>>16555139i have worked in a clean room like this and it really depends. some people do important work with silicon wafers and others do simpler assembly work. not everyone on a clean room has an ultra technical job where they're soldering circuit boards under yellow light. some people are gruntsso, the average IQ is probably just 100. it's as if you took a sample of people off the street, the answer would be the same.
>>16555335/sci/ moment.
ASML (Advanced Semiconductor Materials Lithography) is a Dutch corporation.TSMC (Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company) is a Taiwanese company.Taiwan belongs to China.Uncle Sam needs to GTFO of Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, and the Philippines.
>>16555151>lets turn this thread into being about mefuck off Elon
