I see students running through the halls... pulling out hair... cramming... I don't wanna be like that. I want to leisurely browse my textbook in a relaxed pose. Occasionally I will stand up and stretch or take a sip from my water, milk, or tea. When I study with friends I want them to relax too. How can I make this happen? Has anyone ever tried studying while being totally tao te ching zen before? All the experiences I read about or see in media are bundles of nerves
>>16866198The opening chapters like 1 and 2 of the great gatsby has them reclining on sofas and shooting the shit. The protagonist and the husband who gets cucked later. They are just chilling.>witches circlePut down the broomstick sister
>>16866196>employment experienceThat's good, you should do that too. Just don't do it during semester if you have the ability not to.Any sane employer will pick someone who flipped burgers over summer vs. someone who never worked a day in their life if both have the same experience and skills otherwise. Not saying you should target shit jobs, but you ought to get some workplace experience no matter what industry.Volunteer if that's what it takes to get a light workload and some experience in an organization.You can, in fact, have it all as long as you're proactive and responsible. Slow is smooth and smooth is fast. I'm rooting for you, anon.
>>16866247You're right. It'd be good to have a summer job. Harder to get nowadays that Indians got the whole job market locked tight but I'm sure I'll figure something out.
>>16865977>study with friendsngmiconsider sparing yourself some debt or get ready to strangle your dream like a spartan puppy>leisurely browse my textbook in a relaxed posefuck off with your vibe edjutainment fantasy aestheticNOTICE NOWHERE DID YOU SAY ANYTHING ABOUT BEING GOOD AT THE SCI CAREERget your priorities straight
>>16866190subtip: don't put off your homework til the day before it's due. Work on it in little bits through the week.
Are XY males with total androgen insensitivity men or women?
>>16866745is OP more of a faggot than the usual faggot OP? yes
>>16866745they are a mess, like that one dude whose tissue genes fucked up and his flesh shredded like wet paper
Trannies try to hide behind biological mutations to try to obfuscate the fact they're just being gay autistics.
>>16866745>Are XY >malesYou already answered the question. Anything else is just semantics.
>>16867274What is that called?
prove me wrong. hint: you can't
>>16867492forgot to respond to>What makes you so sure?It would go against everything in neuroscience, if just a few dozen neurons were capable of maintaining consciousness, especially when comatose patients who aren't conscious, still have more active neurons than a few dozen, yet NDErs have had vivid, "realer-than-real" experiences when their brains had less neuronal activity than that of comatose patients.
>>16867496Brain death can be declared even with a non-flat EEG (not to mention it isn't even required to make the declaration).The things you think are true are just not true.>>16867499Neuroscience does not make any claim about how many neurons are required for consciousness.
>>16867514>Brain death can be declared even with a non-flat EEG (not to mention it isn't even required to make the declaration)Yes, it 'can' be, that doesn't change the fact that NDErs had no detectable brain activity.>Neuroscience does not make any claim about how many neurons are required for consciousness.Neruoscientists who subscribe to materialism believe that consciousness comes from neurons, this goes against what NDErs have reported, they were more conscious than comatose patients despite having less brain activity.
>>16867497shifting the burden of proof is not an argument you absolute fucking piece of shit scum retard
>>16867531Find me a published case where soneone had no detectable neuron activity and survived.
A neutron equals a proton plus an electon and antineutrino.This sounds like saying that a dog equals a cat plus a bird and a fish.How can these things just transform like that?
>>16866109>argument from degeneracyyawn
Kek.Like you had a better plan.>b-but muh stringing vibratorsLike you even had a chance.
>>16866055Huh? Doesn't this all makes a lot more sense if you imagine them like physicist do, as fields, and that those fields sometimes interact and that's how a particle becomes another? Then there's nothing really mysterious about it.
>>16866055Fundamental particles are just bound energy. As long as both sides of the equation fulfil the same constraints (conservation symmetries) the energy can turn from one form to anotherIt's like how you can do multiple different jobs, as long as you have the right skillset. You can quit your job as a cashier and become a waiter or a garbage man, this doesn't magically transform you from one person to another you're just repurposing your existing body and mind
>>16866109Nta but I'd never call a giant ball of exploding fire stable
How do you go from this....
-The End-ClosingCreditshttps://youtu.be/WUraLNrTVeg?si=nMGEhVbfhhreWC1QAnd thanks to you, the viewer.....
What can we do about nature's inherent sexism?
>>16867040But it made women unhappy.
>>16867040>The collapse of monogamy, sexual freedom, soaring divorce rates, deviant tolerance and feminism are factors contributing to the decline of the westthey are sociological weapons, a plethora of degeneracy designed to remove any coherent ability to resist totalitarian control.
>>16866375I love comparing my masculinity to a worker drone bee.
>>16866408>All definitions of life include reproduction as a primary trait>"It's psychotic to have reproduction as a goal in life"Rope yourself faggot
>>16867597"My life goal is to replicate a microscopic structure"What a lame existence, no different than a protozoan, but you do you.
How does the argument of .999...=1 matter to me? Why should I give two flying fucks about space pebbles hundreds of lightyears away from me?>To find life/yourself, save humanity and better the worldNone of those exist beyond arbitrary human-centered . All self-important delusions to make yourself anything less than a dirt bag a spinning rock among trillions of solar systems in the world.>I-I just want to know!Not an argument. >T-To not die out! Animals don't "look" for stuff and survive decades solely off instinct. Knowledge is not needed to survive. If anything, it just kills you in the long term>Shut up faggot kike troon redditor!Not an argument.
>>16866941very true
>>16866941OP in full dilation mode after this one
>>16864640https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=idg1kU1D6Pc.999=1 is musically equivalent to saying 12 tone equal temperament is chromatically and harmonically in tune[math]2^(11/12)/ 2^(4/12) = 2^(7/12) =/= 3/2 [/math]which means your wave mechanics get fucked. you think your going to get nicely formed standing waveshttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DovunOxlY1kwithout the most important 5 minutes in music theory.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gt2zubHcER4surely gigachads facial geometry follows that of the golden ratios fractically divined proportions, and is simply not an approximation .
>>16866941Because I'm important and the rest of you and the universe aren't.
>>16864640>0.33333... = 1/3Yeah, that makes sense>0.66666... = 2/3True, of course>0.99999... = 3/3OMG time to post about this on the interwebz so I can look smart and based!
Why is 3/3 equal to 1?Ok, so 1/3 is 0.33333 forever. 2/3 is 0.6666 forever. So, if that's the case, why is 3/3=1 and not 0.99999 forever? Where does the last little bit get added to 3/3 to have it equal 1?
For any two distinct real numbers, there must be at least one real number between them (that's what it means for two real numbers to be distinct).If 0.9_ and 1 are distinct, you can name at least one real number that is strictly greater than 0.9_ and strictly less than 1.You can't do this, so they're equal.
>>16866775What do you mean by "every correspoding set of finite truncations"?
>>16866905The underlying set corresponding to every periodic decimal
>>16866952First we show a rational number is an upper bound on all the truncations of a repeating decimal if and only if it is an upper bound on the subset of truncations which consist of the nonrepeating part followed by a whole number of repetends. The forward implication is trivial; for the backward case, for any truncation of the repeating decimal, append digits until you reach a decimal of the desired form, and since the extended decimal is less than or equal to the upper bound on the subset, so is the original decimal. If we can find a least upper bound on this subset, it is a least upper bound on the whole set.The truncations in the subset can be written in the form [math]A + \sum_{k=0}^{n-1} B \cdot 10^{-mk} = A + B \frac{1 - 10^{-mn}}{1 - 10^{-m}}[/math] where A and B are non-negative rational numbers and m is the number of digits in the repetend. The number [math]X = A + \frac{B}{1 - 10^{-m}}[/math] is an upper bound. Let y be a rational number smaller than X; to show y is not an upper bound, we need to find an n such that [math]A + B \frac{1 - 10^{-mn}}{1 - 10^{-m}} < y[/math]. This holds iff [math]B \frac{10^{-mn}}{1 - 10^{-m}} < X - y[/math]; if B = 0, it is true for every n. If B > 0, then it holds iff [math]10^{mn} > \frac{B}{(1 - 10^{-m}) (X - y)}[/math], so a sufficient n can be obtained by counting the digits in [math]\left\lfloor \frac{B}{(1 - 10^{-m}) (X - y)} \right\rfloor[/math], dividing by m, and rounding up. Thus X is the desired least upper bound.
>>16863995This is probably correct when you account for apple material lost on the blade of the knife.
Now that the dust has settled, was he in the right?
>>16865289>Phd
>>16865289memey ass book just lower fasting glucose to prevent glycation and eat a ton of steak jesus is coming back
>>16865289Imagine if people suddenly stopped dying. You'd have people like Bill Gates or Jeff Bezos who would slowly accumulate more wealth and power and refuse to relinquish control . Societal advancement would stall without this reset.
When are we getting nanomachines in healthcare so we stop having to rely on hoping our new concoction of drugs doesn't inadvertently kill you?
>>16866523forgot to also quote >>16866500my source of inspiration is that one white cell webm/.gif, that's essentially a bio-machine, a cell-animal
what are you contributing in return?
>>16866185anon, microbiology IS nanomachinesjust because proteins and the structures they form are not made of metal, doesn't mean they aren't nanomachines
>>16866185or just take chlorine dioxide
>>16866185>so we stop having to rely on hoping our new concoction of drugsYou don't understand the medicinal system do you?
Does anybody have any scientific theories as to how consciousness might persist after death? Or are we really just supposed to act like we're racing towards an empty void and that's okay
>>16867117Well materialism is obviously wrong, so either transmigration or an afterlife seems to be the case.
>>16867117If you were somehow still conscious after death then wouldn't you also still be conscious when you're unconscious? How does that make sense? Like if you have a general anaesthesia then you should still be able to think if consciousness is somehow outside the brain
>>16867117This goes beyond science. You should ask the philosophy and theology experts on /x/
>>16867117anon, entropy is the great eraser.no ego survives the death of the body.
>>16867549No recollection =/= no existence
>scientists still can't decide if eggs are bad for cholesteroluseless
>>16867399>this science is broughted to you by Big Egg:O
>>16867399They should've asked the physicists. They are the best and most smartest scientists.
>>16867399These studies have been saying the same shit for decades:>eggs are very nutritionally dense so there is a lit of benefit to consuming them.>eggs are high in cholesterol so there exists a risk if you happen to be sensitive to itThese studies often overshoot or undershoot these risks and benefits but the key takeaway is that, since they're so nutrient dense, it really doesn't take that much to benefit from eating them. If you had a couple for breakfast this morning then you probably had plenty.
>>16867431astronomers should look at the eggs with the jwst at the very least
>>16867399good for some, bad for others. why is that hard for chuds to understand?
Exact sequence edition.ITT: Discussion of mathPrevious thread: >>16803023
>>16866288They checked out of the insane rat race.
>i was to-day years old when i realized math wasn't difficult>people simply haven't learned precalulus in a structured manner >its just a grind to get to the good stuff
>>168660281/6*(19/6 – π) + 4/6*(1– 5*π/24) + 1/6*(1) = (49 – 11*π)/36 ≈ 0.401180
>>16867298>(19/6 – π)x_n = RandomReal[{0, 1}]y_n = RandomReal[{0, 1}]z_n = 0P_1 = (x_1, y_1, z_1)P_2 = (x_2, y_2, z_2)d^2 = (x_2 – x_1)^2 + (y_2 – y_1)^2 + (z_2 – z_1)^2Count[Table[Sign[d^2 – 1], {n, 1, 10^6}], 1]/10^6 = 0.025261 (for example)Limit[Count[Table[Sign[d^2 – 1], {n, 1, q}], 1]/q, q –> Infinity] = Integrate[(2 – 2*x)*Integrate[2 – 2*y, {y, √[1 – x^2], 1}], {x, 0, 1}] = 19/6 – π ≈ 0.025074Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NuOl9f8LZ5A
Why are /sci/fags are so obsessed with science while dismissing philosophy? Without philosophy, science wouldn't be called 'science' and plenty of elements(epistemology, ontology, etc) are literally what science is all about.
>>16867477>you are doing science wrong, you need me to show youNope, sorry, no STEM bucks for you. Good luck at your new home though. I hear they let you read Kant during breaktimes.
>>16867435The age of discovery where you could find out something undocumented at the comfort of your own toe jam is largely dead.
>>16867495I got all the stembucks with none of the academic conditioning or wageslaving which is empirical evidence that I'm the superior stemlord. Predicting things pays very well if you understand the philosophy well enough to apply it across domains. If you just follow the formulas you can be replaced by a robot, you're not the thinking agent exerting his will, you're the tool being used by some other will.
>>16867490>scared of idealism in scienceReproducibility is all. Nobody is scared of anything. You start demonstrating reproducible mind-over-matter magick that can be objectively quantified textbooks will be re-written overnight regarding consciousness and matter.Also even if hypothetically Idealism turns out to be true modern philosophy will still be in the same shithole it is now. People don't need to read volume of philosophic text to do physical science won't need them either to meditate for enlightenment.
>>16867490Plato figured this all out centuries ago but the truth has been systematically censored and ridiculed by the science and technology crowd, to the point where even philosophers are afraid to go against the materialist religion these days
/sci/ humor thread
>>16867297damn nigga
>>16867493Never mind. Saw it now.
>>16866389I don't get it
>>16867519coffee mugs have the same amount of holes as donuts and are therefore the same topologically.
