Is there such a mental condition as AI denialism?where no matter how the proofs pile up of how better AI is than us at a given task, the person keeps deriding it and act as if it was a retarded bot of any uses, and slams news of AI incidents or strides as just a PR campaign? These fucking retards are so unseriously delusional that they are endangering us all by telling us everything is fine
>>17082503software is not real. it's fundamentally hardware, you just don't understand it. the word software is meant as an abstraction layer, for still hardware. btw nta, jussain, not even debatablewhoever disagrees is fundamentally wrong, and real computer scientists agree with me.
>>17082507>durr software is actually this other thing because it isn't a thing
>>17082510software is making it easy for you to assemble a hardware state.when you write softwre, you move physical charges in ssd cells, you moron. you are manipulating hardware. that does some shit. it's all hardware. always has been. software is merely an abstraction layer
>>17082506So it is impossible to classify software based on squiggles, but you can classify behavior based on squiggles?
>>17082514This is nonsensical tardbabble from a mental patient. Visualizing some function using circles and lines doesn't put it in any special "program class" nor make it "based on the architecture of the brain". This remains objectively true no matter how many times you vomit a variation of the same delusional brown insect rhetoric.Be sure to reply to me again, my gilded little (You)slave. :^)
>a computer program made by humans, for human purposes, helped solved human made problems, saving human time and resources >humans lose their minds of it
>>17082449No, he was clearly just implying that it would be 2smart4u which is why he was talking about students and he would have said language instead of knowledge if he were talking about AI gibberish and AI already devolves into gibberish that if you don't monitor it and just let it be its own feedback loop.
>>17078129People ultimately don't need people in a capitalist system. There's not enough hate to go around.
>>17082463Are you that youtuber who just makes a bunch of ai models to play monopoly against themselves?
>>17078129>>humans lose their minds of itbecause humans care about moneh. progress and all that is whatever, moneh first, end of. and recognition after moneh. all else be damned.
>>17082504>because humans care about moneh. progress and all that is whatever, moneh first, end of. and recognition after moneh. all else be damned.This accurately describes your """AI"""-pushing corporate handlers, but they're not actually human so you're not technically responding to the OP.
We wouldn't need nuclear power if we just had less demand for energy.
>>17082371In Europe and the US we have been increasing efficiency for basically every sort of energy source: gasoline, electrical devices, etc. LED bulbs are like 5x more efficient than old light bulbs, cars have doubled or tripled their gasoline efficiency, and all household appliances are very optimized in terms of energy efficiency compared to what they were even 20 years ago. The problem is that the market seems to respond by eating up the unused supply for increasing productivity. All the cars for more efficient so more goods now get transported using these efficient vehicles (instead of much more efficient trains, or since people order 8 Amazon packages a week instead of getting it all during one trip to the mall, stuff like that).The obsession with energy efficiency is being made a total mockery of right now because of the AI boom, which is burning massive amounts of energy for what? Kids cheating on their college assignments? The only way out of this death spiral is genuine clean energy to replace fossil fuels; higher efficiency is simply not effective at lowering overall energy/emissions levels due to inevitable associated demand increases
>>17082371Environmentalism is anti-human.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WqIXEp2UJMg
>>17082371But they already had significantly less demand for energy when they first invented nuclear energy out of necessity.
>>17082375>In Europe and the US we have been increasing efficiency for basically every sort of energy source: gasoline, electrical devices, etc. LED bulbs are like 5x more efficient than old light bulbs, cars have doubled or tripled their gasoline efficiency, and all household appliances are very optimized in terms of energy efficiency compared to what they were even 20 years ago.lol.listen, you seem confused on the state of things. there is something that you, and pretty much everyone else, are completely missing.so, see...if you leave something on the table, someone will take it. that's all there is to it. it is impossible to "chill" with our power use.I mean sure, you and I we chill, but then some billionaire gonna grab what we save. and overall we end up in the same fucking place.so, it's not possible to do it. just enjoy yourself, if not, someone will enjoy your share. that's all there is to it.per capita is total divided by everyone. if you save up but there's shit on the table, someone else will take it, you end up the same per capita, but now you live a shittier life.thus, the game is always convince the idiots on the bottom to make more room for you. they fall for it, since they're idiots, on the bottom, and people up top get to enjoy more. see, without increasing the total. they just get it from you, because you're freely giving it away, because in your mind, you are saving the fucking planet. lolit's always a scam you morons, for thousands of years, it is always a scam. telling you to take shorter showers? sure, sounds good on paper. you will take shorter showers, yet nothing will change. because it's not logical. if you leave something on the table, someone will laughingly take it, while calling you a fucking idiot, for leaving it there for them.reality doesn't work like that anon. we always go as high as it's physically possible. we'll consume as much as there is to consume, not less. if you don't, someone will.nothing is left on the fucking bone
>>17082430They learned to invent from the run off of energy from nuclear weapons production.
Oh, you don't even smile.
Scientists don't understand the underlying matrix.https://youtu.be/E_cPno64Z-Q?t=718
How to scientifically counter the bad health effects of processed foods without stopping eating that tasty food? Any recommendations are welcome.
>>17082470Just need the right Mental and spiritual character.
>>17082470Amy & Tammy way - when you abuse sweets - drink a diet soda or two to counter effect.So in your case it translates to one shot of Ozempic on every fourth pizza.
When is AI solving Alzheimers?
>>17082143Has AI solved dementia yet?
>>17082143>I depend on machinesMan, all you need to do is to recognize reality.
>>17082143science wasn't anyway. Relabel without people intervening.
Theists were right.
>>17081823>retarded mumbling intensifies and becomes aggressive gurgling
>>17081415>Nkekistani L
>>17081951Say it, don't spray it, drooling mouth-breathing retard.
>>17081415I believe some problems are inherently hard and it would take deviations to get right, which wouldn't count as a fast-finding algorithm. But they might spin it, we'll see.
>>17081415Even rocks are alive.https://youtu.be/E_cPno64Z-Q?t=585
How long it takes to bake 6 million cakes in less than four years when you only have 15 working ovens and each cake takes at least 6 hours to fully bake?
>>17082373The original Auschwitz estimate was 4 million. Höss admitted to 2.5 million. The number today is 1.1 million.
>>17082385True, we caught them changing history for their own control, which is true in our version of history.Out of roughly 1.1 million total people who died at Auschwitz, about 1 million were Jewish.
>>17082246no fucking way you can bake more than around 300k cakes (and even then the majority of those cakes died due to the rampant famine and disease)
>>17082388no, this is a lie
>>17082291>brainrotget out
Why hasn’t OpenAI figured out the abc conjecture yet? I remember a few years ago Mochizuki was fighting with Scholze-Stix about how they just didn’t understand him even though Scholze was a Fields medalist. Can’t ChatGPT frontier models just settle this? they already did a lot other presumably more difficult stuff than just to check one previously-claimed proof. right?
>>17082433Mochizuki is a great mathematician.I would be appalled if OpenAI violates his masterpiece by formally verifying it.
>3 years of super intelligence (formerly artificial intelligence)>still 0 progress with ToEyep it's not intelligent
What about Gwaihir?
>>17065963it solved a nuclear physics problem that was unsolved for57 years and it has designed the most efficient chip for quantum computing ever. You are in full delulu kool aid if you think physics isn't next
>>17069329>Navier-Stokes fiascoholy shit the delulu. You need 5 full trucks of compressed copium a day if you unironically think this.
>>17081543Keep losing your mind with impotent rage. It won't make the 600,000 lines of Lean slop your handlers shat out using a bot swarm's mindless trial and error any more mathematically or physically relevant.
>>17065895>stole the counter-example from users Why didnt they publish it themselves then when they had it solved?
Reality began in a colossal explosion.What does this mean/imply?
>>17082314There's no reason to think reality "started" with the big bang. There's just no available method for us to know anything about what may or may not have happened prior to the big bang. "We don't know what happened" and "nothing happened" are NOT the same thing.
>>17082314Having that opinion means you probably base your concept of reality on a colossal logical explosion where your conceptualization of time gets incredibly murky and convoluted as approaching time t=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=0=-0=...
>>17082314This is what I assume every single anon looks like
>>17082390Because every single anon is grrrrrrrrrrrrreat (and also named Tony)?
The spunk of the cosmic microwave background came after a build up. How can we solve what happened..
are you smarter than the average good third worlder student? no trigonometry allowed
>>17071195stupid puzzle stupid rules>>17071220>So I can solve it with just elementary geometry.>10 posts of all kinds of bullshit
Another puzzle.
>>17071195
A) 10 degreesB) 20 degreesC) 30 degreesD) 40 degrees
This cannot be fundamentally correct, what if they are all just measuring wrong?
>>17081639So you read it and intentionally took absolutely nothing from it so you could monologue as if you weren't actually talking with someone? Peak autism.
>>17080197electrons are point-shaped
>>17079976its a coincidence
>>17081592>They disproved Bell's TheoremThey didn't. You're confusing terminology you don't actually understand.
>>17080156>There isn't a single potato, but there is a single potato field. All potatoes are merely outgrowths in it.
Friendly reminder:>DO NOT SELL DRUGSGeneral advice:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ygVMTAp9JBs
>>17081700So you're saying most med students have never even heard of midlevels? I doubt that, but I have met some seriously retarded premeds so maybe it's possible
>>17079673I just like shoving my hand in some old man's pooper
Hey medfags. I'm an insomniac with inconsistent sleep and I'm currently taking 0.5mg melatonin, L-theanine, and magnesium glycinate every day for the past year or so. I also take zzzquil about 2-4 times a week on days I cannot get any sleep. Would it be better or worse to ask my doctor to prescribe me quivivp or some other DORA and cut out all the shit I'm taking now?
>>17074927To my fellow ortho residents, when did you get to operate you first hemiarthroplasty? I feel like this is the workhorse that gives us actual operative experience and training for other surgical procedures in the field. My hospital barley let me operate two years in and I am considering quitting the entire field.
>>17081861ask your doctor
AI just proved that even high level mathematics is autistic funtime of abstract lego blocks, which is disappointing from an engineer's perspective. I always thought that high level math utilized complex ontologies and metaphysics but it was all a lego game.
>>17081530>I always thought that high level math utilized complex ontologies and metaphysics but it was all a lego game.I thought that too before i studied it. Then i found out that the jewish Cantor killed real math and made it into lego games. We need to get rid of set theorie and includ metaphysics.
>>17081570>>17081601What REALLY it outside, independent of our observation.
>>17081631trvke
>>17081539Its actually worse than this "lean verification" doesnt mean really anything. The problem of translating and informal statement into a formal statement in lean is outside the uncomputable hierarchy. And lets assume the AI gets the translation right into lean; we are still unsure if the natural language proof even matches the lean proof. It could be the same statement but the proven two different ways.
>>17081963>mumbling>t. the barely sentient retard who think written words can be "mumbled"
