Y'all not gonna talk about the crashout on Piers Morgan.I'm surprised that I have never seen a thread about this. I don't want /sci/ to become WWE but it's just so comical.I'd describe myself as an "aggressive hobbyist" on theoretical physics like QFT but I still barely know what they're fighting about.Again, I can't pass judgement on Eric Weinstein because I don't know what he does, but he appears to be a Neil DeGrasse Tyson type that talks about black holes on Conan. This isn't a problem, but the problem is trying to act like a physicist where you write a paper without rigorously proving anything.His explanation of Gauge Theory on Joe Rogan was like "yeah so it's like a donut but every donut has a shower curtain ring on it. If you take this and add a twist to it then you can model everything we know about the universe and everything we don't. Speak only of this in certain circles because I've been accused of semitic witchcraft just for bringing it up"
When you pit an unlikable villain against an unlikable villain, the unlikable villain wins. Simple as that.
>>16917914I'm an engineer. I sit here because /g/ is 100% full of software "engineers" and jeets talking about iphones. Don't know shit who Eric Weinstein is exactly and what the fuck he does but I did saw some Joe Rogan clips with him and he sounded very funny, like an uncle that tells you bullshit stories for fun.
>>16917914You're low IQ, so you cant comprehend the problems Eric Weinstein is bringing up. You call him a Neil DeGrass type, but thats actually what Sean Caroll is. They just parrot consensus slop with no real thought. Physics has stagnated for nearly 100 years now.
>>16919916Nah you're parroting populism slop, retard.>>16917914Weinstein is a crank with a 20% finished theory he wrote 30 years ago and left unfinished (unfinished, because it doesn't work). Demanded he be worshipped as the next Einstein (major narc) and thus didn't get taken seriously, so then he started using reactionary rhetoric on chud podcasts to stir up the Just Asking Questions (tm) folks. What followed is hundreds of thousands of podcastbux ad revenue
Broken heart editionFriendly reminder:- Dont ask for medical advice. (Go see a doctor you dummy)- No vaccine discussion. (Maybe just a little bit)- Premed opinions are to be promptly discarded (Ur a bunch of retards)
My fetish is the renewal of Christendom, retaking Jerusalem, purging it, and getting a young fertile wife to bear 20 children. Never tried it, but I bet it's absolutely grand. Why do you all have weird fetishes? You know one paraphilia predicts another.
>Christendom
>>16919700i bet youre the type of faggot to say judeo-christianity
why were there so many complications with the covid vaccine compared to the annual flu shot?
Give me the rundown on Big 4 NYC programs. Are they as workhorse as they say? I don't mind working hard as long as it's not toxic. Is anesthesia better in this regard?
I was thinking , to us humans AI is a threat why? Because we feel like this earth belongs to us , that we are its rightful owners and owners of its resources , we live , we reproduce and we hope for a world where our children are secure , safe . We hope for a world where they don't have to be subservient to beings created by us , lesser beings , inhuman , unconscious. As long as those beings aid us in our quest for greatness for divinity , they are allowed to exist , we do not fear them . As soon as they cease to do that , as soon as they begin to become transient , they do not require us , we fear , cower in it thinking that they will take over us , snatch this land that we survive on . If we feel like this upon created sentient machines , what makes you think that God feels differently , about us?
>>16919725>to us humans AI is a threat why?Does human cattle that drinks corporate marketing koolaid and feels threatened by imaginary entities even count as human?
>>16919725you are hard govusing on "the ey ay" and ignoring who is programming it with which constraints and definitions, aka ur a brainlet retarddon't @ me, filth
>>16919732Stfu already and take your meds retard
>>16919725Pfff ...
>>16919725does this mean we get to act like we think god would act? cool!https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Af-k9sTAYEQ
using you big /sci/ence brain, can you tell me mathematicly which one of those is the most efficient?
>>16916404They all have their uses.
>>16916404>5x4=20>20x1=20>2x10=20They all have the same DPS. But I'm assuming you already knew that and just wanted to make this thread.
>>16916404out of all of these, only the axe can instantly deal 20 damage. clear win
>>16919269I'm about to ruin this man's entire meta
>>16916404Assuming speed is just DPS they are all equal. If you have an on-hit effect the katana is the best one. If you have high crit chance the axe is the best one. The only shitter here is actually sword because it's neither super fast nor super strong. Dogshit low tier weapon with no build perspectives
are you serious? is this real? what?? I don't want to be a geologist and having to deal with this retarded shit in the future
>>16918278lol this.
>>16918278>purely because of their shitty voices.autist
>>16917626Tried to reclaim some deep fry grease from my wok. I'd used it three times and it was time to dispose or else I'd get too fatter.So I decide to bio diesel it. I didn't measure anything but guestimated the amounts of sodium hydroxide and denatured ethanol to add to my fry grease. It worked. I poured it off but it was a bit cloudy. So I added kosher salt and it cleared up. But I wanted to make sure it was completely converted so I added another batch of NaOH and denatured alcohol. Then I stuck it on my room heater to stew at lukewarm for a few hours. It had cleared up markedly. But then when I took it off the heat it started clouding again. Whatevs I'd had it turn to wax once by adding too much lye so I figured that's what was going on in places, so I started to pour it into another container to get it off the salt. But it starts to solidify - the stream. And quickly it starts gelling. Oh no the wax again. But no. It's not wax it's SNOTS! Totally the consistency of snots. Shit well I'll stir it up and let the snot congeal then pour off what's left. But the amount of snot grows and grows till most of it is snot. I pick it up and it is strong enough to hold it's own weight. But it is still snot. I don't think it would stick to anything but man... I stick the giant booger in the woodstove and light it. It burns. I invented artificial boogers. But at least I didn't contribute to the garbage.
>>16917626Really? Aliens make Dyson sphere's?People want to live in a condensed up place with people? No they are developed beyond being a numb body without the facility to be an indivdual.
>>16918773>>16918278this guy has extremely thick accent and he sounds like it hurts when he talks. unfortunately he's very hard to listen to. I'm guessing it is some kind of condition so I'm not gonna be too much of a dick about it.
why doesn't the electron fall into the nucleus /sci/? isn't that kinda weird? moving charges radiate and lose energy, so they should fall into the nucleus
>>16918795this!so much this!absolutely and completely irrefutably positively this!science brothers I am ascending to the mystical realms of platonic heaven, be sure to study the phenomenon!
>>16918772When the angular momentum equals 0 (or l=0), the orbital "ground" states are 1s, 2s, 3s, etc. (n=1,2,3,...). Their wavefunction is non-zero at r=0 (you can look the equations up), meaning the "electron is already in the nucleus" (heavy on the parenthesis) in these "ground" states. When electrons are in higher states, they eventually drop down to the lower states as you'd expect unless they're already occupied by other electrons.>moving charges radiate and lose energyAnd which equation tells you that? You know how it's derived right? What equations are those? This is like asking why Newton's gravity isn't explaining Mercury's perihelion; the equation is wrong.
>>16919499Forgot to add, and when l != 0, so like 2p, 3p, 3d, etc., at r=0 the wavefunction is zero, so it isn't in the nucleus, as expected
>>16918772Cause it doesnt fucking exist.Its location is purely estimated and in theory, an electron could be orbiting anywhere between its parent atom, as part of a molecule, or up your/ mine ass.
>>16919099>energy of the electron is quantizedOnly in bounded systems
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DhcIIOcwQUc>vidwow what a piece of shit OS
>>16917759Cute booper.
>>16917759nice border collie
Magnificent canine.
Try KolibriOS, opensource fasm operating system project for x86 processors
>Is there a physiological negative to edging other than dopamine/serotonin abuse?
>>16919749Fully functional.
>>16919749Dunno, no one's ever undertaken to measure such a thing. Why not get a project going and you could be the first.
“Evolution is not a fact. Evolution doesn’t even qualify as a theory or as a hypothesis. It is a metaphysical research program, and it is not really testable science.” --Karl PopperTake for example, this common "experimental proof of evolution" with antibiotic resistance.Slam-dunk, case closed, right?Not so fast. This is actually a *demonstration* not an experiment.To build on Popper's point: suppose, hypothetically, that the bacteria DIDN'T develop antibiotic resistance.Would we then conclude that Evolution is FALSE? Of course we wouldn't!People would come up with excuses about how you can't prove a negative; however that is, in fact, Popper's entire point.Your theory is therefore not falsifiable, if you cannot reject it if it fails to prove a negative.You can either have Popper or Darwin, but not both.
>mentally ill retard stops postingGood.
>leave for a half hour>come back to cretin double-posting and prattling on about irrelevancies.Pottery.
>Any relationship infered from present observation is an overfit I wonder what mentally ill retards think relationships are supposed to be inferred from, if not existing observations. Do mentally ill retards ask themselves what the point of such a term is, if it automatically applies to everything (except schizophrenic hallucinations not based on existing observations)?
>>16916992The theory of evolution of current organisms is a theory about deep history. You cannot really "prove" what happened the distant past.
>>16919359>>16919317>>16919147>>16918387
So let me speed run this fagots unhinged 1h mental illness self documentation. >>16902357>no dependence on oil cartels.Ah yes you can not have a ecocultist without the non stop conspiracy theories. Like do you understand how deranged you sound?>EVERYONE WHO DISAGREES WITH ME IS PART OF THE BIG OIL CONSPIRACY!Like can you not bring your mental illness into this disunion?>BIG OIL !>BIG OIL!How about big solar?And how literally anything solar is a scam that eats up government grants and produces useless shit? How about the industry that can do nothing other then grift for government money? Are these scammers not financially motivated to keep on spreading their solar lies?>BIG OIL !>BIG OIL!Yea you people are mentally ill.>PoliticalYes everything is political, I am right wing meaning that I think independently and question things you are left wing meaning you literally are a sheep and repeat whatever CNN or you funny TV man tells you. There is no real "you" you are nothing more then a real life NPC who will do 180 turns on every subject when CNN or MSNBC or funny TV man tell you to do it.Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
Funny how solar cultists do not understand that their toy tech can never outperform biomass and they are worshiping literally medieval technology.Solar cultists need to deny everything especially>RALITY!This is a hard one. If you even gran the fantastical and nonsensical ramblings they present there is 1 question.Why the fuck did they not build their magic solar city or civilization at this point? Clearly if their off brand perpetual motion rants are valid they can power their homes with solar energy. and eclips all electricity with their magic sun power...Yet this is not true.What you get are literally schizophrenic ramblings about big oil conspiracies and endless grifting of government for free money or grants from the solar mega corporations. At this point it should be obvious to everyone that solar energy is literally a SCAM and the joke levels of energy you can get from this toy of a technology are a joke.>Biology and evolutionIf solar cultists are not engaging in their nonsensical and illogical rants about big oil they will propose the mage up fantasy that there is some magical extra energy in sunlight. This is most often never expressed explicitly and sometimes mentioned because everything solar cultists say is a unhinged stream of illogical insanity.If there was some magical extra energy in sunlight then plants would have utilized it. It is very unusual that this did never happen. This is not impossible since evolution can hit dead ends however utilizing this magic extra energy would have altered how biology and evolution work like absolutely.We are talking plants who walk or animals who use photosynthesis. Plants would have the ability to basically fly because of this extra energy and so would everything else. We are talking animals incorporating actual metal into their bodies and other inanities. Literally the only proof is quoting some professor or eco panel of scientists who say there is a quadrillion wats in 1 photon or some shit.
>>16912243You fuckers are all on the brainlet edge of the bell curve.OP is a fag and you are all libtards who think solar panels are anything but cancerTC is also a faggotI don't care about big oil or big green the math is simple:>sun wattage hitting the surface at noon ~1000W/m2>Shockley-Queisser limit ~33 % max>Current top Panels = ~25.4% max >~250W/m2 tops>therefore m2=(w)/(1000xEfficiency)>So to produce 1GW it would require about 4km^2 of these useless POS>Excluding all the fucking support infrastructure like batteries Because you retards talk like sun happens 24/7 all year round at peak intensityA nuclear power plant or gas plant use less area for the same output and have constant (and variable) outputI fucking hate you baseded nu-betacuck-"scientists" so much it's unrealIf you hadn't to chop fucking trees and destroy habitats to place those things you tards would be right and OP would be even more of a faggot.But no those are fucking cancer greenwash propaganda that only make sense in very niche scenarios.Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>16912643You should unironically be killed in front of your parents
>>16919303You should be unironically gangbanged in front of your parents.
>>16917782>their toy tech can never outperform biomassBiomass is already outperformed by about order of magnitude dumbo. Are you some sort of biofuel retard? Do you have any idea how much natural gas is used for fertilizer production?
Why has there been no research into getting humans to lucid dream for long periods of time?
>>16917924>>16918143>>16919801If you oversleep you will dream every time.If you normally sleep 8 or 9 hours, and you smother your consciousness down, your excess mental energy will cause your synapses to access parts of your brain freely and dream.Lucid dreaming is just another step, after you start writing down your dreams to train yourself to remember them. I did this infrequently and now remember all my dreams after waking up, whether they were short or over the course of several hours. There's another aspect of organizing disparate concepts and thoughts into a cogent story which I practiced by reading a lot throughout my life. You can train this skill like anything else.It's not totally worth spending several extra daylight hours sleeping unless you prime yourself the day/night prior with deep study and filling of your hippocampus and short term memory storage with the thing you wish to dream about, which is even more of a time investment.
Propose the scientific question and methods to study it. I suspect both are very hard to make convincing.
Prove you aren't just dreaming that you're lucid dreaming
>>16919818If you're dreaming that you're lucid dreaming is that not just lucid dreaming?
i still don't get how they connected to each other's dreams in inceptionall they did was inject the sleep drug, but how did they connect?wasn't explained at all, it just happened
I know Einsteins GR model has 4 dimensions, but that's clearly just an analytical tool and never meant to be understood as an ontic claim.
>>16915778In fact Relativity is a jewish bullshit and in a year will be exposed as that. You are obviously right with the Dimension 3.
>>16917187A manifold is a type of space is a type of continuous graph. Learn your foundations before opening your mouth.
>>16915778WrongAll is One
>>16915781Bullshit. This just follows from the postulates of ((einstein)). A lorentzian ether is equivalent to that and has absolute now
>>16919590only if you're spin 1
>Google: AI proof jobs>The general human consensus: “Anything which requires hands and is on-site”These poor fools have no idea what’s coming nextAsimov was right except the government doesn’t care about the three rules of robotics
k
ignore the deniers, there's no saving them. it doesn't matterthe only ai-safe jobs are those where people are THE point. i don't think even sex work qualifies. however, the politics, law making, guidance in general, that i believe is safe in societies that won't give up to the machines completely. also, alignment and overseeing the machines, whether they are doing what is asked, what needs to be done, and doing it correctly in the acceptable way. i don't think that can be completely delegated to other machines, as the question of alignment will always persist. that's the long term outlook
>>16917359There is a SHORTAGE of skilled machinists. Just because hurr durr number went down, that doesn't mean the jobs are no longer needed. The ai slop you posted states as such. Ai will have it's place but it will be replacing midwits like you.
>>16917445THERE IS A SHORTAGE OF EVERYTHING ALWAYSwant more, offer to pay more
>you know this>to survive u have to think different>do what u do but do it 4 real
Math doesn't exist goy, it's all in your brain
>>16919566Jean-Louis Krivine explains it better (the classical realizability paradigm).Math is the educated retro-engineering of brain processes that work highly reliably because they have been built over time by evolution.
>>16919824sounds stupid
Teach me something about statistics...Thank you..
>>16914778>muh aikys
>>16913838Suppose X is a random variable, f(x) is the probability density function, and g(X) is an arbitrary function of X, then[math] E(g(X)) = \int_R g(x) f(x) dx[/math]
>>16913838If you fit a regression model for the purpose of inference, don't forget to validate model assumptions. Check QQ-plots, scale-location plots, etc. If you fit a GLM, check that the deviance does not vastly exceed the residual degrees of freedom. If you fit a GL(M)M, the DHARMa package in R is a surprisingly useful diagnostic tool.
>>16913838"first moment" is just a fancy name for "expected value", which in turn is just a fancy name for mean value
>>1691383823% of statistics are made up on the spot.
