https://www.academia.edu/144176197/The_Classical_Quantum_Hybrid_Architecture_for_Topological_Exploit_Detection_CQH_TEDmake some additions to this paper 4chanive had this concept in mind i hope someone can understand it
>>16798753https://www.academia.edu/144176347/The_Classical_Quantum_Hybrid_Architecture_for_Topological_Exploit_Detection_CQH_TED
>>16798753https://www.academia.edu/144176384/The_Classical_Quantum_Hybrid_Architecture_for_Topological_Exploit_Detection_CQH_TED
>>16798792final version for now
You know what I would like hear about?Is>>Other Shit
is the force of gravity racist?
Gondwana is bigger.
Guys, I need to ask for some science advice. So I hate sleeping, I really, truly, fucking HATE sleeping. I have no problems getting to sleep - I don't have insomnia. I fall asleep in the normal 15-30 minute window. I just get such intense (i think it's anxiety?) anxiety (?) in the lead up to bedtime. I start feeling super on edge, like the world is about to end. I start feeling like I have to throw up and nauseous. My psychiatrist put me on buspirone recently because I told him this and it does seem to work a little bit but not much. L-Theanine, even in large doses, does absolutely nothing and actually seems to make it worse. I'm at a loss for what to do
>>16799769Don't sleep for a day, or try to maximize period of not sleeping. You will naturally feel sleepy and will want to go asleep by yourself. Controlled sleep deprivation was found out to have antidepressant effects. For more see Hu B et al. (2021) Meta-Analysis of Sleep Deprivation Effects on Patients With Depression.
>>16799769>pepeoster>gets psychiatrically meds for a non issuechecks out
How do you know that even though the future was like the past in the past, that the future will be like the past in the future? and what is your basis for knowing that?
>>16772076Like I was TRYING to explain: "a spell to force an omnipotent into a spell which revokes its own time" IS par for the simulitic class of arguments course.And will necessarily stack during war
>>16776856Lacking credible evidence of any fair omnipotent, I have to focus full time on magic
Okay since seeing as I can sort inet using multiple sitemaps, since Sitemap is technically internally sortable via (alg-equiv) of "the Wikipedia game," you can very likely invite me to a game environment using rules I have to publish elsewhere
I may need to publish vectors here in respect of a proper public resource
it's 50#50: either there is a proof of work or there isn't.
What's the math to realistic animation, basically the detail to walk/loop/scenes, how leg swings, hands, how they change order, or how lef and right is in tandem, how loop is written like the same position of start and end... how is this described in math, with emphasize to character, correctness and finally realism?
>>16798093computer animation(CG) is what you're thinking of but i was referring to traditional hand drawn animation>tracingthat's rotoscoping and it usually looks like shit
>>16798097Yeah and handdrawn do not works like the reference. It definitely looks like it has physics in it. I mean, otherwise it'll be straight up work. Or maybe i thought the phyiscs will help with, getting it
>>16798087he must of escaped the crazy house a few weeks agochrist i hate this mentally ill fuck
>>16798047You are thinking of inverse kinematics.
>>16798371Not sure. can you show it on a picture? Last time i forgot you to illustrate it. Basically between frame 1 and 2 and the "curve" in side the sequence. ...Basically math of the curve. and loop. and the, feet-arm tandem and queues.
>get a stem degree
>>16796518its more worrisome that STEM is 90% big tech now thats a major science crisis.
>>16799088it isn't, stem is just the worker bees, the people who make all the important decisions are creative types who earned real degrees that require intelligence, not just "i memorized the heckin trig identities and calculus integral formularinoes"
>>16799730what degrees are those?
>>16799730my point is that stem graduates mostly go into jobs that involve ads or other service bullshit instead of inventing machines etc. thats terrible for a country since they move manufacturing outside.
>>16799991t. hopelessly clueless
This will happen at some point
>>16786966In this fantasy, what explanation is there for not returning to the use of technology, and instead dumping all of it uselessly in piles?
>>16799064>I'm pretty sure I could rebuild all of civilization from the ground up in a few years.
>>16799069Unironically people would be using computers again within a week or two.
>>16786966Big sad if true
>>16786966And if we suddenly have an explosion of plastic-eating microbes that like eating yellow hard hats those tradesmen are gonna be in trouble.>>16786975We'll see them coming but that has nothing to do with the fact that almost nothing is hardened against it. It's not a catastrophe though....Unless it triggers a general systems collapse by fucking up agricultural logistics or something, in which case the overpaid tech bros will probably outlive everyone else.>>16791730It's a CME, not an EMP weapon. Anything with a surge protector is fine. Probably.
>men have sex with other men increase chance of aids>gay men become relevant in the 80s>aids suddenly become mainstreamaids come from faggots fucking each other in the ass why do they refute that idea, that FACT BASED proof?
>>16799872then don't be a faggot
Don't women get AIDS?
>>16799906you ever heard of women sleeping around dumb nigga? only men do that you goofball.
prev. >>16795282
>>16801395Sadly no, saved it from some long lost 4chan thread over a decade ago. Makes me wonder how much pre-internet space art may end up being forever lost.
>>16801395>>16801415The artist is Philippe Bouchet. I couldn't immediately find a higher res, but didn't look too hard because I need to sleep. Good luck.
>>16801153Because you're talking millennia of naval tradition, not aeronautical. A lot of the astronauts were Navy vets.The commander actually controls the ship, and the pilot guides it near dangerous terrain. It's way closer to the archaic meaning of the term
>>16801375>USSS Kessler Syndrome
>>16801480Commissioned ships just have the USS designation, regardless of the kind of ship that they are. So if the Space Force ever commissions ships, they'll just be USS Donald J. Trump or whatever, no need for an extra SThis is also how you can tell that the Solar Warden shit is fake >USSS HillenkotterIt would never be named that.
I feel like this is one of those topics that has so much confusion and misinformation attached to it that it's imperative to actually speak in laymen terms what "Race is a social construct" really means.For starters, there are no such things as human "races" from the standpoint of biological taxonomy. The boundaries of what we would instinctively consider "races" overlap so dramatically that trying to pigeonhole any such group into a "race" would be scientifically unintelligible.That being said, this doesn't mean that physiological differences between population groups aren't existent. To give an example, it's not simply Western-centric brainwashing to notice that people native to Nigeria on average have darker skin than people native to Finland. The fact is, people native to Nigeria actually do have darker skin on average compared to people native to Finland. And this can be explained easily through evolutionary biology -- Homo Sapiens who evolved in Nigeria received more UV radiation on average than the Homo Sapiens who evolved in Finland due to the tilt of the Earth which focused more direct sunlight on those who lived nearer to the equator. Which has led to more selection pressure for Nigerians on average to evolve more melanin in their skin compared to their Finnish counterparts, since melanin protects against UV radiation.To conclude, both these statements can be true simultaneously:1.) Race is a social construct2.) There are physiological differences between population groups due to geneticsI feel like when a lot of people hear the phrase "Race is a social construct" they think to themselves, "I can obviously see a physical difference between a black person and a white person. So why are you pissing on my head and telling me it's raining?" Obviously physiological differences between humans exist, it's just that "race" from a taxonomic standpoint doesn't.Hopefully this ends some confusion.
>>16798408>>16798405
>>16798365What's so hard to understand? Your being jewish is irrelevant to being able to understand it.
>>16798616Jews who dysfunctionally identify as Jews are just inbred Euro-adjacent white people with a snowflake complex.
>>16798616Why would there be more traits than the ones the ones the problem is about?
>>16794540Stop overcomplicating something so bloody simple. Fuck.
Who is responsible for this scam? All properties are reducible to physical laws.
>>16799106Emergentist.
>>16799106Just means nonlinear results outside of the expected linear reductionsWe’re kind of fucking stupid to be honest
>>16799106>disregard internal forces>disregard complex nonlinear properties>assume small angles everywhere>use group and relativistic reductions>uhhh why did that happen?Most scientists are dumb as fuck and can’t compute or predict as far as you can throw them
>>16799208>>16799210A pleasure to see such groundbreaking dialogue on this esteemed porn site
>>16799891If you can't see the difference between the two posters, you should stop watching so much porn
Does this rlly works?
>>16799718learn how to program python and learn how to use numpy and matplotlibit's like 21st century literacy
>>16799738I would if I had any need to do so
>>16799753it would behoove you
>>16799768Uhhhhhhh fiinnee ill learn to program python (*><)
>>16799622>1 trillion piecewise functionsWhat's the fewest number of functions it takes to draw Yotsuba?
Do isometric contractions in fully lengthen positions cause enough mechanical tension to stimulate myofibrillar hypertrophy and or increase motor unit recruitment?Or would you still need a full range of motion?
Aside from what the other anons have saidFull range of motion exercise also provides better practice for when you need to use the muscle with your full range of motion
>>16796865What if you did something like a heavy barbell back squat for 2 sets, then after you would do a series of deep, PNF stretches for another set. Would those stretches increase the hypertrophic response? Like, take a barbell, set up some pins, get under the bar and get as deep as you can, and slam the barbell into the pins while trying to go up as hard as you can. That would seem to drive a great amount of mechanical tension.
>>16797162What you describe is training explosive strength as in Olympic weightlifting. Look at them - they are all wiry. You can lift heavier weights by moving slower. Heavy =big, fast=tough
>>16796178No one knows. Sports science is hardly a science.
>>16796178I am pretty darn fit, you might get very minimal results from isometrics but you really need to go through some kind of a range on motion.
Why are protons/electrons asymmetric?>positive subatomic particles hang out in the nucleus with neutrals>negative subatomic particles are smaller for some reason and orbit around the nucleus
>>16798901For the same reason they aren't symmetric, just because
>>16798901taus are heavier than hydrogen-1 atomsbut to the best of our present knowledge, as >>16798937says, just because
>>16798901The Protons are hang together by the strong nuclear force. But how is the strong nuclear force doing that? Basically, Quarks can't do 1+2=2+1 (they are non Abelian before anyone calls me a quack) and therefore all of the mathematics of a Proton's insides just gets stuck together and it can't escape. The best quarks can do is pair up in form of Mesons, which the mesons just cause the Protons around them to glue together. The only way out of the situation is to get hit by a high energy particle.Electrons on the other hand can do 1+2=2+1, and do end up having a degree more freedom. You are correct that the electrons don't want to be near each other, this creates the orbitals via the Pauli Exclusion principle. Technically two electrons can be in the same orbital if they have opposite spins, but they are really spinning around relative to a 4th dimensional space so whatever.(quarks also spin like this, but their spins are irrelevant because, again, they are dumbasses and can't do 1+2=2+1)
Or just another gimmick like nuclear fusion, perpetually being 20 years behind of being completed?
>>16799509Not to be weird, but isn't it true to say that we can make even simple tasks take a very long time to complete through inefficient algorithms? Even something as simple as F(n) = n can be transformed into a never ending calculation.Tell a computer to run some successor function for 10^100 iterations. Shouldn't they be more precise in how they communicate so as to not have obvious counter examples?
>>16799521Yes, it is true, numerical analysis is literally about such things. (Not the original poster)
>>16799509>That being said, some of the problems it can solve change the problem from O(n) to O(sqrt(n)), which is something to hebold, but it's currently not worth the squeeze in most cases.there are two big algorithms in quantum computingwhat you mentioned is Grover's algorithm, which searches unstructured space in O(sqrt(n)) instead of O(n)this is great for performance but the real issue isShor's algorithm, the second oneit can factor large integers and completely break modern cryptography, which would have massive implications, perhaps even destroy societythe only thing that stops it from happening already is we don't have a big enough quantum computerbut the crypto community is urging people to move away from traditional algos to post-quantum algos ASAP
>>16799429its a gimmick just like silicon computing was.
>>16799429>gutentag i am the sabine hossenfelder, das scientifican kommunikateren>i am of doing things the simpleren BUT NOT ANY SIMPLERENER>just because of the watching my channelgeziet nicht ze meaning I AM DU FUCKING FRIEND>having of the fun now BUT NOT MORE THEN IS OF REQUIREMENTEN
