Smartest man alive has a problem with dark matter.
>>16101521>shouldnt*If all you know of the world is travel channels or news...its a different beast.
>>16074362anon casually forgets about the space shuttle
>>16074362Online shopping brought us door dash...Im lazy, no matter how hard I work at some matrice of reality...Im super fucking lazy...... Prefer in bed, naked or undedwear (IF I FEEL LIKE IT).
>>16093582(you)
>>16101192
Itt we talk about fauci ouchies
>>16102622nothing, nothing at all
>>16102624geeeeg your board has 0 pph, we gotta put 0 effort in
bump
HOLY FUCKING SHIT I LOVE DR FAUCI
fauci is good because he offed thousands of faggots and then he followed that up by poisoning millions of low IQ npcsantifaucites are only upset because fauci tried to trick them into volunteering to be murdered by the clotshot
After seeing Lucy (movie) i'm really interested about what would happen if humans started using more than 10% of their brain. Obviously not as science fiction like making other people hover in the air, but maybe control your own metabolism? Would that be possible if you would suddenly become aware of the 'unaware' part of your brain that controls food process and so on?
Almost 7AM, time for French pastries and weed vape pens...life as a Mathematician is so boring...Ho hum...
>>16100219Sir, the issue under question is the maximum juiciness of the human pussy. Please address it.
>>16100255Hollywood is a reflection of actual living people.https://youtu.be/nvCeuwYCX8Q
>>16092913If a percent of the stuff of IQ maps regularly seen here were the truth, a 5 poit IQ increase would have enormous financial impact.Much of the world is now in stagnation, a major intelligence uplift would probably get us out of the problems. From this we would see rapid development in genetics, brain knowledge and health.
I hypothesize that a typical person is, in fact, using close to 100% of their brain every moment. I propose an experiment which has the possibility to disprove my hypothesis: remove some small amount of a person's brain, say 10%, and observe their mental function.If the typical moron is only using 10% of his brain to begin with, it's unlikely that we will accidentally scoop out the 10% he happens to be using. If we do, we can repeat the experiment several times until we have determined what parts of the brain are necessary and what parts are not.If, however, my hypothesis is correct, then upon the removal of any significant percentage of the brain, particularly from the frontal lobe, the test subject would be reduced to the level of mental function shown by Mr. CoP.I welcome alternative theories that could explain the mismatch between the amount of the brain that a person can "tap into" and the amount that is necessary for proper life functions.
Plenty of people, especially on this website, do not understand that a scientific hypothesis has to be effectively proven in order to be elevated to the level of theory. A scientific theory is NOT a guess. Evolution is a fact.
>>16102771no it isn't
Science doesn't prove things, it disproves them. If a theory has not been disproven, then it is assumed to be true by inference.
>>16102810Notice I said "effectively proven," not "proven". That is only possible in mathematics.
>>16102771This is an old image. No mention of denisova, likely an early entry of people related to Melinesians aborigines and papuans into the new world long before ANEs, pretty sure type R reentered east Africa from outside. Also genetic exchange with Neanderthal and denisova was more transformative than 5% admixture would suggest. Lots of new stuff coming Into view.
darwin's evolution conjecture is not a scientific theory because it cannot be disproved.
its your time to shine, janny
This is Dr. Twum's TED talkhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=osRK1UlOijAIn it she sings the praise of the human immune system and says its the best thing at fighting off infections of all kinds and that vaccines, particularly the covid vaccines, were a big failure in comparison. How does /sci/ feel about this?
>>16098428You couldn't tell she was a science genius from her appearance?
>>16099089Lots of fakers try to disguise themselves as scientists for clout
>>16067517Yes. Unironically.
>>16067517OK, but did you even watch her video?
>>16101863I watched it and it is very good, but unfortunately /sci/ is filled with racists who hate Twum and refuse to watch her videos even though she sets a fine example that all aspiring scientists should emulate
what effect does this have on the environment?
>>16100396It literally says in the fucking OP image that it’s a tsunami map. Look at the top.
>>16100450yes 'jeet, its a tsunami of your subcontinental fecal matter.
>>16100476why isn't it densest at the mouth of the Ganges river then, retard
>>16100477it is densest at the mouth of the Ganges river, retard
>>16100329>this is how jeets attempt to mark their territory
Dysregulation of Hypothalamic Gene Expression and the Oxytocinergic System by S•ybean Oil Diets in Male Micehttps://academic.oup.com/endo/article/161/2/bqz044/5698148>S•ybean Oil Might Be Altering Our Genetic Material And Leading To Diabetes And ObesityA lot of people out there are trying to eat right, to give their body the fuel it needs, and to be as healthy as we can while we’re doing it.That said, the advice and ramifications of what we put in our bodies seems to change all of the time – and now, something you probably eat has been proven to alter our actual genes.The oils we use in foods and for frying, among other things, have changed quickly over the past couple of decades. Where canola or vegetable oil might once have reigned supreme, now peanut and s•ybean oil have taken the lead as “healthier” options.When it comes to s•ybean oil, though, researchers are sounding the alarm.Studies are starting to show that the rise in its use has coincided with a rise in metabolic conditions like diabetes, insulin resistance, and obesity.This latest study shows that it even causes genetic changes in the brain.Studies with mice have shown mice who consume s•ybean oil are more likely to develop metabolic conditions than those fed something else, like coconut oil.Researchers posited that the linoleic acid is to blame.
>>16098460It's because everybody is tired of it getting spammed. Take that as a hint.
>>16100554
>>16100564good pic lol
>>16100554Why dont they censor other bullshit spam like bbc or whatever
>>16102792HHHMMMMM....Why don't they....?...
Nutrient found in beef and dairy improves immune response to cancer https://biologicalsciences.uchicago.edu/news/tva-nutrient-cancer-immunity >Scientists at UChicago discover that trans-vaccenic acid (TVA), a fatty acid found in beef, lamb, and dairy products, improves the ability of immune cells to fight tumors. Is this why """"science"""" is trying to eliminate the cattle industry and blame it for """"global warming""""?
>>16100217Thats a good paper
>>15968463>At least the things learned from Mengeles experiments, for all their horror and injustice, were ultimately used for bettering peoples lives.Name two.
>>16100217>Bing Hu a,1, Xin He b,1, Hao Sun c, Yongyi Hu a, d, Fei Li a, Yanxiang Sun a, Jie Sun a, Li Feng a,
>>16098728Thanks!
why is meat targeted as bad for us so often? what caused the perception?
>Switch to a 90% meat and fat diet>Suppliment with some fruit>Literally every physical or mental problem I have dissappears within a week>Lose 10 pounds a month every month of fatSo, at this point, it's beyond any reasonable doubt that the best possible diet for anyone is obviously a high meat diet. Now, the question becomes WHY is anyone still holding a different position? It's recently been proven that the carnivore diet can literally cure bipolar.
>>16068772No it isn't, its clearly an alpaca
>>16083782yes they are
>>16050087>All the poor health started as people began to eat so much meatAbsolute fucking retard. It is literally the opposite. Grains are shit slave food. Meat and dairy consumers mog vegans in every metric.
>>16102707massive dude like that and he didn't probably didn't even make it out of the regional bokh tournament. mongolia could easily be just as developed and "modern" as china, but they just don't want to be.
>>16058218Kek got all these stimulant addicts upset
A 10 year long, multi-trillion mega project to supercharge the advancement of AI would bring us a 100 years into the future by the end of it.
>>16102770I won't give up on this high thought!Consider the growth in our economy that coincided with the growth in our technologies.And so, the multi trillion spent would be dwarfed by the returns; a Jetsons-like explosion of possibilities
>>16102768God what would i do to suck that guy on his prime this world is soo cruel
>>16102774There will never be another Manhattan project. AI is a meme, literally just matrix multiplication.
>>16102772It's a long story, but basically a Stanford vision experiment in 2012 led the the explosion in modern AI.Well, imagine if there was a program dedicated to computer science experiments that'd mimic as many aspects of the human body as we can.Consider the tidal wave of side innovation that'd come from that
>>16102777AI is an amalgamation of contemporary computer science breakthroughs.But yes, one can basically replace 'AI' with 'modern computers' in any given article about it.In any case, a massive project like this would matter-of-factly bring us innovation that'd be as breathtaking as the internet's creation.
Evolutionary speaking, Why do humans enjoy and like and dream of becoming famous and known if celebrities tend to die earlier than the average person?
>>16102701>>16102703>>16102704but people prefer to be famous and poor the rich and not famous
>>16102730*than
>>16102730It's almost like the Human brain was intended to operate in a small tribal unit on a savanna or glacial steppe, and is completely overloaded by modern social systems.You know how too much sugar overloads your body and causes you to become diabetic? Same thing with modern social systems.
>>16102735If humans can't handle it, then why was our population allowed to get so large? You would think humans would never reproduce enough to get beyond the optimal tribal size of 200 or whatever.
>>16102739>then why was our population allowed to get so largeNobody "allowed" or disallowed anything. What happened was a group of primates living in tribes discovered how to throw good, bang rocks to make fire, and then how to ensure that the berries which grew last year will grow next year where convenient. Everything that followed was a snowball beyond biological evolution's control. Humans survived fine on our initial mental programming, and we adapted as best we could. It sucks, but a lot of things suck. That's life.
What /sci/ field can I find the biggest whores?
>>16102716/threadcame here to say thisits literally the "art hoe but took ap classes in high school" major
>>16102719Anywhere but the sausage fest that is bioinformatics, but I guess that doesn't qualify as biology anyways.
>>16102700Psychology
>>16102700The rare female in Engineering will either be the biggest stacy you've ever seen, or an ugly autist.
>>16102757>The rare female in Engineering will always be the daughter of an engineer who wished that he had a male child instead of a female one
Let’s say you were to take the top .1% intelligent men and women of reproductive age. Put them in the same geographic area , give them all the resources they need and tell them to have as many kids as they can have. Years later, test their offspring, once again isolate the top 0.1% most intelligent. Do this a few times. Just what type of minds might you end up with?
>>16100654if done on humans. if done on dogs, it would make dog ai where they were perfectly adapted to please human intellects
>>16100635>Just what type of minds might you end up with?This experiment has already been done, you end up with Jews
>>16101876Jews are dumb as fuck. They breed people to have tall foreheads, because they think it equals a bigger brain.
>>16100635>Just what type of minds might you end up with?Feminists and Grass Eaters. See South Korea, see Japan.
Convergence towards the mean is a thing.
What’s the scientific explanation for us all being able to tell 100% of a scientist’s political and social positions within 25 milliseconds of seeing their picture?
>>16099935>That is the face of a woman trying to be seen as ugly.
>>16099142androgeny increases before civilisational collapse.
>>16099197>Literally prejudiceThis, which I'd argue is worse than or perhaps the root sin of racism.What is racism without prejudice anyway? is it just cultural identity or heritage?
>>16099127Weak people lean left.
>>16102009>sin of racism.no such thing, racism is the one true ideology. jews shill the idea of racism as a thought crime as a means of weakening the cohesiveness of other races, which in turn makes the other races easier prey for jewish influence