Need a nigga with his finger on the trigga to force me to study maths
>>16830977I am the trigger on the finger
I am i am i am i am i am i am i amYouWiSH
>>16830977Do problems. It's more engaging. Don't mindlessly watch video lectures or read texts. Active vs passive learning. Obviously this works better if you like math, have natural curiosity, and study an appropriate level math.
>>16830977Why do you want to force any study as punishment?
>>16830977>>16831197Damn, bros, I do this studying math shit for fun.
What would it take to induce a second puberty in adult male homosapiens? I need a bigger penis and more height yesterday.
>>16829643>bigger penis and more heightSorry lil bro, your growth plates have already fused. All that dosing with hgh is going to do is give you acromegaly
>>16831263Because you're not tearing the penis when you jerk it. Though I think if you tried lifting with your dick, it'd make it bigger
>>16831442There is no true muscle in the corpora cavernosa. You have to be careful about giving this sort of advice because some /fit/ crossposter gymcel is actually going to try it and then end up with a penis fracture when his tunica albuginea catastrophically ruptures. Then he can never get hard again. The funny thing is that that's the downside of all surgical and noninvasive penile lengthening/girth increasing techniques. As soon as you start making cuts in the tunica albuginea your penis will never be as hard again
>>16831426is that supposed to be a bad thing?
You can always restart your life.
I am the universe/God manifesting reality.
>>16830734http://entityart.co.uk/electric-universe-free-energy-solar-system-hollow-earth-part-1/also metaphysics is literally beyond physics... better to consult a sageif you want true science:>electric universe>tesla>walter russell>free energy>water powered machines>energy harvesting buildings>robert otey>noel huntley phd fractals>schauberger>quantum physics>critiques of gravity and relativityetc.otherwise:>lurk /x/Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>16830610There is no basis to assume the world existed before me, nor that it will exist after me. Not just that "my version" of it will end, that "the world" itself will.
I am god hallucinating the present moment
I'm not actually stupid.Basically what we call God eclipses ordinary thinking. I am not alone at all.
nvm solipsism is true I was just tricking myself
Status?
>>16829773from releasing information related to the Epstein Affair (the mossad plot to control the US government through blackmail)
>>16830106To be fair, there was that one episode with Bruce Campbell and its premise was never retracted.
>>16828971It's a rock.
>>16831088Can't agree more. The government shutdown seems like a flimsy excuse. There are certainly still people working at NASA that can forward a fucking image file to the media.
>>16831451Actually upon further reading it turns out that HiRISE is operated by the University of Arizona. The goverment shutdown excuse makes even less sense now.
>It is impossible to conceive of mathematics without geometric and chronological intuitionWas he right?
Without bullshit analogies or schizobabble about symmetries
I saw pauli in his office spinning a fucking menorah
>>16825570>infinitesimally smallnot a thing, you're just too big :)>zero radius.they have radius :Dgg ez
>>16830752It’s called spin because it couples particles carrying it to the electromagnetic field in the same way classical spin angular momentum does and contributes to the Noether charge associated with rotational invariance the same way spin angular momentum (a classical observable ) does. The fact that it’s not actually associated with a literal rotation and transforms as a spinor rather than a pseudovector were discovered later, but the former two remain true.
I don’t understand why people have difficulty in understanding and imagining spin. Are it those who believe that wave function collapse is an actual physical thing?
>>16831411What is spin and what happens when you measure a particle?
Do you really understand this?
>>16831427You and I see the rope as a one-dimensional space, but the ant sees a tightly curved second dimension that it can exploit to hyperspace from point A to point B. Same thing.
>>16831427No. I remember Lee Smilin talking about this and he said that no one really understood this among the string theorists except the guy (Yau) who came up with it, along with Calabi presumably. Although he might be exaggerating. Basically the loops you are seeing are part of a torus, the parts where the surface pinches together is just where the torus closes up, so these images are in some sense a crosssection of the actual surface, which is higher dimensional anyway, and we dont get to see the whole thing. The string lives on the brane and the masses and path integrals are all calculated there without singularity or infinities. But there are more than 10,000 equivalent Calabi-Yau manifolds so they are back to square 1.
>>16831427Um, I would like that mayny apples please. Yeah.
it's over everything is fucked editionPrevious Thread: >>>16792899This thread exists to ask questions regarding careers associated to STEM.>Discussion on academia-based career progression>Discussion on penetrating industry from academia>Or anything in relation to STEM employment or development within STEM academia!>If you have a question, before posting, read some of the older posts and ,if you can, try to answer their questions on your post. That way the thread isn't an endless log of unanswered questions.Resources for protecting yourself from academic marxists:>https://www.thefire.org/ (US)>https://www.jccf.ca/ (Canada)Information resource:>https://sciencecareergeneral.neocities.org/>*The Chad author is seeking additional input to diversify the content into containing all STEM fields. Said author regularly views these /scg/ threads.No anons have answered your question? Perhaps try posting it here:>https://academia.stackexchange.com/Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>16831033There's not really a lot to share outside of hiring season. Other than dooming and glooming about the absolute state of academia, what do we have? Job-havers are busy with jobs. Academics are abused cucks who keep going back to it despite the pay and conditions That one math PhD is probably still unemployed and it's definitely a them problem not a math problem.I guess there are the undergrads who keep coming here asking the same questions over and over again.
General question answers:>how do I become a ____You don't >Is ___ a good pathNo>should I work in ____ fieldYou shouldn't, it's a trap>is ____ employableTen years before you finished school, that ship sailed>I am a ____ studentYou fell for the meme, imagine actually studying ____>I want to learn _____There is no special trick, no magic lecture or video series, no easy route. You read textbooks and practice solving problems. If you do not do that, you do not learn. If there are no textbooks, you learn by doing.>I'm interested in _____Stop, go no further, actually learning to work with it will make you hate it.
>have to start hiring for another PhD position next month
>>16830972I don't have a PhD yet and I code. Well, last couple of months I've mostly been telling my minions to code actually, only writing some light embedded stuff myself.
>>16831033I come here to bitch and moan, not offer or solicit advice.
what will be the end result of dysgenic reduction of IQ by generation? Will man become ape again?
>>16831227>medical transplants.yes because medical transplants drive evolution
>>16830783The others said "Nothing they plan to do will be impossible for them.".That is why is happening.
>>16831227midwit, maybe even a retard. Stop using biological terms you can neither define without consulting chatgtp nor would understand even if you tried.>Look mom, I'm using the biology words!! Am I not a retard anymore now??
>>16831227trvke
>>16831227Hagaz is that you?
Why does nobody take Geometric Unity seriously?
>>16831281fpbp
>>16831279Because it's not a serious theory.
Math is the shape everything takes. Even a nothing - a zero - becomes a one. He’s not wrong that it’s all geometrically united. How could he be?
>>16831279read the "paper"
>>16831279First of all, how dare you?
>>16826741Thank god, I'm safe. >>16826751fpbp
>>16828007>anon, social competency is highly correlated with iqNot exactly tho.
>be told I was a 145 IQ genius in school>am now a complete fucking failure with no career, no house, no family, no hope>all my normie friends have passed me by and lapped me in lifea lot of good that """big brain""" did me
>>16831373you never had 145 iq
>>16826741I’m fine with my 115 or so IQ. My schizophrenia, on the other hand, is extremely debilitating. It makes my life hell. Perhaps if I could think more clearly, it would boost my cognitive abilities.
Hey /sci/, it's my first time here, I apologize in advance if I do not strictly follow chan etiquette. I'm in the search of new book about molecular biology, and i have already these in mind: * Molecular biology of the gene (Watson)* Molecular biology of the cell (Alberts)* Molecular biology (Craig)* Molecular cell biology (Lodish)* Molecular biology (Clark)I am looking for university-level books that cover the topics in a general way. I would appreciate any recommendations you may have in your area of expertise. Thanks!
>>16831014Pirate them all and get the one you like the most. Those are the best anyways as far as textbooks go. I unfortunately have to use cooper's which sucks ass>Hey /sci/, it's my first time hereNever say this and kill yourself if you're indian
>>>/global/rules/16>All request threads for adult content belong on /r/, and all request threads for work-safe content belong on /wsr/, unless otherwise noted.>>>/wsr/1523975
>>16831028Fuck you I am brahmin you cannot conceive my smart
How is it to operate daily on a sub-130 IQ? I'm genuinely curious.
>>16828295You are Indian
>>16828565>reaction is basically aggression to any basic shit that confuses them.which is based and correct. if someone is trying to get you to do something using reasoning you don't fully understand, preemptive attack is the best strategy to derail any schemes they might have going on.after all, there's a reason why the average IQ has been naturally selected where it is. at some point you've got enough to survive even when facing vastly more intelligent creatures.
>>16828295can you give an example of a scheme not working? unlike the other anons I am genuinely curious.
>>16820717Retard here. I have a PhD and good employment in the relevant field, and it's not humanities. In fact, peers who are definitely smarter than me seem to struggle a lot more.
>>16831147Nope. Latin american.>>16831246I made a logical error when building initial rapport. I won't go into details, because even though it was something small and innocent, it's still embarrassing and I'm still surprised of how I fucked up that bad. To give the image of being well traveled I mentioned I went to Poland when I was 12 or so. I then provided a myriad of superficial (the deeper you go, the easier it is to get tangled) of facts to back myself up. Shit I picked off reading reviews online. But I made the mistake of also mentioning the many brands of beer available, and told I counted there being around 30 in a single bar.
I have a PhD in math and am thinking of returning to research mathematics, but dude like every unsolved problem is so fucking hard. No idea how I'm gonna actually *do* mathematics when everything is untouchable.I'm not an idiot either. I can solve IMO problems with about a 50% success rate. But with these unsolved problems its like every idea you try doesn't work.
>>16831370>if I have to think for myself about something, its hard!!classic mathtard
>>16831370Why lie? Why write fiction like this? Why shitpost on /sci/? Why do you make your mother cry?
>>16831379>you're old enough to know betterImagination makes the burger flipping times fly by.
>>16831370>PhD in math>I can solve IMO problems with about a 50% success rate>50% success rateWhere'd you get your doctorate? Xavier's school for the mentally retarded?
what the FUCK are the implications
>>16828513Did you watch the video? It was debunked. The issue was that when fuckers explain the quantum eraser, they leave out all the fine details of the experiment and only gave us the interpretation, which was wrong from the start. In the actual experiment, the actual data had to be processed after the experiment was done, and then interpretation of the process was made. This data processing fact isn't something most people knew.In the experiment, there are 2 screen separated by distance that record the particle impact locations. When the eraser is off, the clone of the particle that hits screen 1 either goes into one of two detectors corresponding the left and right slit. This is true. They then tell you that on screen #1 you see two distinct left and right areas, as if the universe was yanking your chain and they stop treating them like waves. This is somewhat misleading. In reality, what you see is a huge blob of dots on screen #1, and it is only after post data processing from the two detectors that the blob of dots can be divided into two skinnier distributions whose centers are a distance apart. Something most people probably never considered was that those two skinnier distributions are both single slit diffraction (SSD) patterns - hugely important.When the eraser is turned on, then instead of the two detectors, the clone hits screen #2. They then say that screen #1 has a double slit diffraction (DSD) pattern. This is true. They then say that it's as if the universe was yanking your chain and now they're treating them like waves. The yanking concept is misleading. In both experiments with the eraser on and off, the distributions on screen #1 are basically the same! >As it turns out, it seems all DSD patterns are the same as the sum of two SSD patternscont.
>>16831282Suppose that screen #2 and the two detectors are very close so particles hit screen #1 after their clones. They would then say that since you know which way the clone went, say the left, you know which area on the screen the particle hit. But this is misleading, because it literally could be on the left or right side since the two SSDs overlap each other greatly! Instead, for each particle you can only give a probability of where it lands based on the left SSD.Then suppose that screen #2 and the two detectors are very far away so particles hit first before their clones. They would then suggest something crazy like since screen #1 was hit first, it seems that the future impact on the left or right detectors seems to be affecting the past impact on screen #1! This turns out to be false. As each particle hits screen #1, you can give a probability based on the two SSDs overlap whether the clone is going to hit the left or the right detector.Voila, QM is still annoyingly based on probability, but the universe is not laughing at you.
>>16829159A JOLLY CANDY LIKE BUTTON
read this
>>16831282Somehow no high school teacher seems to be aware of single slit diffraction
