[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Settings Mobile Home
/sci/ - Science & Math

4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.
  • Additional supported file types are: PDF
  • Use with [math] tags for inline and [eqn] tags for block equations.
  • Right-click equations to view the source.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]

[Advertise on 4chan]

[Catalog] [Archive]

File: IMG_0171.jpg (77 KB, 640x640)
77 KB
What if there is a pretender particle?

Hidden in plain sight running the cosmos

File: terry davis.png (519 KB, 450x450)
519 KB
519 KB PNG
>You have 2000 physicists at CERN and not one of them is famous because they haven't done anything original

How do you respond without sounding like a CERN physicist?
20 replies and 1 image omitted. Click here to view.
Depends on how many light bulbs they sell while pretending they invented it.

Actually... edison did genuinely improve the bulb so this isn't that fair to say to be honest. We wouldn't be using them without his input.
But he certainty never invented the shitty first lightbulb.

I'd rather be an edison than an inventor. I want to make shit that changes the world, not just claim an innovation. That's why proper entrepreneurship is intrinsic to good inventors in the modern age.
Though that said, that can also become a problematic thing. Causing industries that try to kill people directly for money and lie about it.
>You have 2000 physicists at CERN and not one of them is famous because they haven't done anything original

Well, yeah this is pretty much true. The LHC is testing the Standard model, which is early 1970s physics. There have been new measurements made but this isn't the kind of thing you get famous for.
Because it's hard you need 2000 guys
>Math heavy
No such thing. If you can pass calc 1, all math is open to you. It is by its essence logical.

Discovering things in it is another thing, few can do that.
Well, engaging physics at advanced level and not at popsci level is not as easy as writing a gay-ass operating system. So it is obvious that a very few people can actually advance physics and become famous. But your schizo ass should also know that just because you didn't see a particular physicist being mentioned on mainstream media doesn't mean he didn't have an original contribution to physics.

File: 2404.05177.pdf (177 KB, PDF)
177 KB
177 KB PDF
Apparently a couple of days ago some very smart asians (I believe japanese and chinese) wrote a paper on power series composition which runs in [math]O(n\log^2 n)[/math] outperforming (supposedly even in practice) the current ones by a lot.

I wouldn't believe that you can get composition so fast (and in fact I need to go over the paper to be 100% sure).

Do you believe this will be the endgame of new and efficient power series algorithms?
10 replies and 1 image omitted. Click here to view.
it's legit and important, but not as big a deal as you think. not a lot of press since these are competitive programming kids, not career academics
if its legit then how can it not be a big deal?
I mean it's highly likely that this achieves the the optimal time for composition, no?
there are applications but it's not as important as multiplication, factoring, discrete logarithm, matrix multiplication, optimization, linear programming, integer programming, etc.
Rarely are you composing these things.
Maybe in the rare case you want to transform the domain to get a better region of convergence of a taylor series then compose to transform back.
Most of the time I would just do a Pade and call it a day.
>accurate enough
Now you're getting it. 6 decimal places and your bridge won't collapse.

File: 8pKne.jpg (152 KB, 1080x1412)
152 KB
152 KB JPG
Do babies really scream during abortions?
36 replies and 4 images omitted. Click here to view.
Headline writer was a retard who can't tell the difference between "cord" and "chord".
You have to be 18 or older to use this website.
there isn't a more evil thing than this piece of shit woman.
whoever allow and practice this late abortion stuffs need to be given the death penalty.
why are rightoids so mentally ill?

File: HkKvvm5.jpg (173 KB, 1080x1556)
173 KB
173 KB JPG
Why is the IQ of college students today so much lower than it was in the past?
90 replies and 10 images omitted. Click here to view.
File: 1000025847.jpg (341 KB, 1079x1564)
341 KB
341 KB JPG

here's an example of a modern Harvard student
Lmao maybe compared to last year. People like you should be the last to talk about IQ.
Affirmative Action
File: 1712366372244779.webm (2.94 MB, 500x666)
2.94 MB
2.94 MB WEBM
File: UtZixe 3.webm (3.93 MB, 576x1022)
3.93 MB
3.93 MB WEBM
First the lowered standards for high school so more people can graduate. Now they lower standards for college so more people can graduate.

Is 'NPC' rude to NPC's or do they have reigns on this conversation?
1 reply omitted. Click here to view.
btw im a furry NPC
>barkon spam
They’re not intelligent enough to understand it, and they don’t have enough memory to remember it.
That’s basically a good way to test if someone is an NPC.
If you call them that, then they forget like two weeks later, they are probably an NPC.
How do you know you yourself are not an NPC? Because from my point of view you are one. So maybe other NPCs are not even aware of that so they don't give a fuck like you.
An attention whore schizo larping npc kek

File: 1710880398279747.gif (1.02 MB, 960x600)
1.02 MB
1.02 MB GIF
What is the furthest dimension from our own, is it central or abridged?
8 replies omitted. Click here to view.
I dunno. Maybe you 'talk' to the clouds. Maybe you find a locale in mind space and 'click'.
>What is the furthest dimension from our own

Youre not invited.
A string of numbers, Pi, is one dimensional, linear. It took me years and years to break into 0th, Unidimensional gets pretty dense when its also PolyDimensional (both), or sub-hypersphere-spheres, 1-D triangles and such.

0th, inverted 0 (from my Vortext/Chaos Maths Torus), is different, feels detached and connected at the same time, Klien bottle-esque.
Its fun to hold a Vortex Math torus in your head, spiralling and all, hard to maintain.

File: 1ae.png (16 KB, 809x808)
16 KB
I'm taking calculus again
5 replies and 1 image omitted. Click here to view.
File: derivatives-logs.png (8 KB, 409x297)
8 KB
just fuck my shit up
Tired of seeing low IQ people making crybaby threads on this board because they failed calculus which literally has 110 IQ cut

4chan isn't reddit, since reddit you can always downvote retards
It's cool anon, I'm taking medical physiology again. I got a C the first time and want an A.
Study something more boring than maths and it feels less shitty. At least for me it was more engaging than reading economics books over and over again for exams.

File: 1712940016277928.jpg (147 KB, 1148x746)
147 KB
147 KB JPG
What if we all farted? Would that be too much of a fart syntax?
If we can set up a universal fart, we will progress unto life 3.
No. I am advocating you hold your fart in until the time where we all fart.
Why the fuck are you like this?

Can someone explain proposition A1.6 here? Apparently it's used to define arithmetic between real numbers as infinite decimals.
12 replies omitted. Click here to view.
How do we know it has a lower bound?
>Hw thread
The material is interesting enough to deserve it's own thread, and /sqt/ can't handle anything past undergrad anyway. And why should we care? It's not like we volunteered to clean up /sci/ for free.
use equation A1.4, has absolute value
But that says that for any k there exists l, here we know an l, but we don't necessarily know that there exists a k. I mean, for given k, all values of [x_i]_l are at least k-close, but that doesn't mean that all values of f([x_1]_l, ..., [x_n]_l) are close. Does it?
Point is to give a definition of the reals and their arithmetic. Here the approach is to define them as decimals (which is painful as can be seen, hence why sane people define them as equivalent classes of Cauchy sequences or Dedekind cuts).

File: lec.jpg (129 KB, 1137x724)
129 KB
129 KB JPG

Lecture edition
Talk maths, formerly >>16089119
306 replies and 46 images omitted. Click here to view.
Ah fuck, I meant the naturals for p and q and the positive reals for the n
can assume p=1 by change variable
then it comes from convex function f(x)=x^q
I'm a dumbass can you elaborate?

(sum xi)^(q') >= sum xi^(q')

f(x)=x^(q') it becomes
Jensen inequality for convex function

File: 1692528461340784.png (761 KB, 711x677)
761 KB
761 KB PNG
I don't understand gravity. The popsci explanation is that it's created by the curvature of spacetime and objects aren't actually attracted to one another but are only following that curvature. But that only explains why objects that are already moving fall down. Why would a stationary object follow that curvature and fall? If I drop a pen, where is that force coming from to push it down? Is it because they're moving through time? Please help
107 replies and 10 images omitted. Click here to view.
File: GK_ni--XQAAbDwS.jpg (96 KB, 1000x559)
96 KB
>I don't understand gravity.

No one from this species does.
I guess I'm not surprised, but you failed to understand my post. The tangent vector of a curve parametrized by the coordinate time is of course not invariant under changes of coordinates.

If you instead parametrize the curve by proper time (or arc length in a Euclidean signature) then the tangent vector is invariant under changes of coordinates. But the norm of the tangent vector is just a constant (1 in appropriate units) and has nothing to do with the kinetic energy.
He's obviously not me (the guy who called you out on your post saying the kinetic energy was given by the norm of the tangent 4-vector). Learn how to use an anonymous message board
There is no need to mystify it.

File: waterhose.jpg (56 KB, 600x600)
56 KB
How long of a stretch of water hose would I need in order to have it in the sun and have continuous hot water?
A shower might be 10lpm. 10 lpm from 4 to 30C is 17kW. The sun might give 1kW/m2. 17m^2 of 20mm OD hose is 850m. You will have to find a way to use less water or find my mistake.
It would be way more efficient to just dig down until you get to ""magma"".
if the hose is always filled with water it would just stay the same over the length of the hose, since you will be heating the same amount of water per hose length.
or maybe i am a retard and didnt understand the question.

File: 1712256057410860.png (725 KB, 950x1125)
725 KB
725 KB PNG
"Up to 50% of patients with cannabis-related psychotic symptoms presenting to the ED requiring hospitalization will go on to develop schizophrenia. "
"Cannabis is involved in approximately 50% of psychosis, schizophrenia, and schizophreniform psychosis cases"
"In one recent study that followed nearly 2,000 teenagers as they became young adults, young people who smoked marijuana at least five times were twice as likely to have developed psychosis over the next 10 years as those who didn’t smoke pot."
"One of the best-known studies followed nearly 50,000 young Swedish soldiers for 15 years. Those who had smoked marijuana at least once were more than twice as likely to develop schizophrenia as those who had never smoked pot. The heaviest users (who said they used marijuana more than 50 times) were 6x as likely to develop schizophrenia as the nonsmokers."
"1/5th of cases of schizophrenia among young males might be prevented by averting [Cannabis Use Disorder]"
Daily weed use was associated with increased odds of psychotic disorder compared with never users, increasing to nearly 5x increased odds for daily use of high-potency types of cannabis. The PAFs calculated indicated that if high-potency cannabis were no longer available, 12% of cases of first-episode psychosis could be prevented across the 11 sites, rising to 30% in London and 50% in Amsterdam
124 replies and 13 images omitted. Click here to view.
Smoking anything is a lot worse for you than alcohol. Most alcoholic diseases are a product of long term dehydration, not alcohol itself. I've known plenty of people who drink alcohol in moderation and are completely healthy, but it should be common sense that people who smoke have a lot of health issues, regardless if it's tobacco or marijuana. Your urinary and digestive tract expel foreign substances, your lungs have no ability to expel years of tar buildup, which is why recovering alcoholics usually bounce back while chronic smokers are disfigured for life. Many countries outlaw smoking because it's dangerous and makes people lazy, but only a handful of them have bans on alcohol as well.
Then why do 2M people die of liver failure annually while only about 150,000 die of lung complications and why do people die directly from physical alcohol addiction such that prisons have to give alcoholics alcohol, but smoking tobacco or marijuana doesn't and nobody is obligated to keep them alive by giving them more of their addiction?
Also if the bounceback for alcohol is so much easier, why does alcoholism actively cause blindness, but marijuana seems to protect against it by reducing cataracts and apparently slowing macular degeneration and glaucoma symptoms?
1. People don't drink enough water nowadays.
2. Liver failure is a quick and spontaneous death, COPD is years of torture.
3. Addiction is only part of the problem. You have to consider that it takes years of heavy drinking to develop a fatal dependence to it. Your average person who moderately drinks can go a long time without any alcohol, but I've never known a smoker who couldn't go more than a couple days without tobacco/marijuana.
4. Prison is over 70% African American. Negros and Mongoloids don't handle alcohol the same way Caucasoids do.
1. No, its not a recent trend, and most liver failure is caused by chronic alcohol use.
2. Liver failure is not spontaneous, it can take decades and goes through a number of stages as you spot, get jaundices, and turn yellow. You would still have x amount more deaths per year if one was deadlier than the other. People often dismiss symptoms of lung cancer until its too late specifically because onset is more spontaneous.
3. Lies, with alcohol hangovers are immediate you can be poisoned to death on your first use, hair of the dog is necessary after just a few weeks of daily use, the shakes can set in after only a couple of months, and physical dependence can result in less than a year. Your anecdotes clearly aren't representative since there is an order of magnitude more deaths from alcohol than tobacco/marijuana combined.
4. Are you retarded that has nothing to do with prisons being legally required to serve alcohol to the physically dependent regardless of race, but no such thing exists for tobacco/marijuana because dependency is not deadly.

File: 1713204367058.jpg (25 KB, 638x478)
25 KB
A charged particle in electric field experiences Lorentz force which determines it's trajectory. What happens to a magnetic dipole in electric field? How is it's trajectory determined?
3 replies omitted. Click here to view.
Wrong. The electric charges have a finite separation. For example imagine a dipole with a third charge very far away from the dipole, along the line joining the dipole's charges. Then the net electrostatic force on the dipole is not zero.
Taking a tone like this just make you look stupid and makes people less likely to want to teach you

>Then the net electrostatic force on the dipole is not zero.
Write down the Lorentz force on each individual charge and sum them up. That is what net force means. It is zero.

In the diagram above, let the positive charge have one unit of charge and the negative charge have minus one unit of charge. Let P be a positive charge of one unit. The distance between P and + is r while the distance between — and P is R (of course making the dipole distance R—r).

Then the net force on the +— dipole is

F = 1/R^2 — 1/r^2

Since R ≠ r, since ethe + and — charges clearly don't occupy the same position in space, the net force is nonzero.

You're an idiot.
That's the electric field dumbass. An electric dipole does of course feel a force in a nonconstant electric field. But we are talking about an electric dipole in a constant magnetic field. Stop embarassing yourself
Electric field is part of the Lorentz force.

[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.