Is any progress being made with anti aging stuff or is it all venture capitalist hocus pocus
>>16789339>several scientists working on anti ageing ... decent progress ... model organisms ... dentified several mechanisms ... identified several non ageing species ... isolated some of the main components they differ inNice marketing tripe, but this in no way refutes anything I wrote. They have all the incentive in the world to make you believe this shit, but no incentive whatsoever to ever let you have this.
>>16788774>muh schizosNormies like you get way too caught up on issue of premediation in the top-level human actors of a system. Any dynamic you can derive from the structure, interests and incentives of a system is going to play out through its actions and the purpose of a system is what it does.
>>16789368Even if the operators themselves fail to foresee some dynamic, they WILL notice it when a real-world situation invokes it and they WILL integrate it into their strategy.
>>16789364They, they, they. More schizo babble
>>16789419I used to be more specific about that until I noticed how assblasted lowgrade midwits get when someone just says "they". Immediately exposes hivemind automatonism.
>naming a moon inceliduswat were they thinking?
>>16789393My moon is getting his own show, though.
We talk about water. What it is, its properties, its uses.Water, man, it just fucking blows my mind. That shit is real. I just poured a glass to drink. Crystal clear and cool. Looking at it I am like "Wow, this shit is two thirds hydrogen and one third oxygen!" Don't you think that's absolutely awesome? Like both those elements are naturally gases at room temperature, but combined they make a liquid, and here I am guzzling this stuff down because I am a thirsty blighter. Most of water is hydrogen.Two thirds to be exact. I think I mentioned that before. Like Hydrogen is the most abundant element in the Universe. The first real shit to come out once the big bang settled down. Fuck me, what stories those hydrogen atoms could tell. I wonder how many times they have been pissed out in some animal's urine. Then there is the oxygen component of water. Did I say its constitutes one third of water? I believe I did. Fucking oxygen man, we breathe that shit in and yet when its part of water we just drink it. Wild huh? You know sometimes I get so awe struck by this sort of shit I could fart my own fucking pants off, how about you? Holy fuck I think I will do that right now.Jesus what a stinker! I think I blew out a bit more than just some gas. Damn, I did. Time to wash my pants. IN WATER! How about that!? What a coincidence! Anyway, lets discuss water. Fuck yeah.
>>16789369Yea, water is cool.
Did you know that if you take a glass of sea water, label each water molecule, then mix it all up good with all the rest of the water in the world, then take another glass, about 80 water molecules from the first glass will be in the second glass?
>>16789369>I think I blew out a bit more than just some gas. Damn, I did. Time to wash my pants. IN WATER!Your mind is going to explode when you realize the shart goop in your pants is just water with suspended shit particles.
>>16789369Mars needs some. Used to have it. Lost it. Sad. Don't lose your water.
How do I motivate myself into studying this shit. Yes, I won the "picked the wrong field and can't change out" award.
>>16789295Power does seem pretty whack. It happens, you'll find parts of it you like. Or you won't and you'll bail into a different field.t. Guy who switched to systems EE after being miserable in a biomed program for 2.5 years.
>>16789295>How do I motivate myself into studying this shit.Inshallah, this knowledge will come in very handy for crippling the enemy.
>>16789295ever build shit?make a tesla coil and modulate it with an electric guitar
>>16789398Kek. My man is not working a day in his life. Live large, King.
Can we finally solve the energy crysis and live in harmony with the planet?
>>16786867>Oil and gas doesn't cut down more forests.Yes it does. https://www.lgcypower.com/solar-energy-vs-fossil-fuels/https://monalee.co/blog/solar-energy-vs-fossil-fuels-a-comparison-of-environmental-impacts/Anything else? Or are you just going to keep pretending to care about the environment but only if is a point against solar?
>>16778698Now post the water sources once the REE mining industry scales up
>>16778668>hurr durr leftistshe was asking about technology, not your midwit take on the current political climate
>>16788552>https://www.lgcypower.com/solar-energy-vs-fossil-fuels/The strange thing about Solarpunk is that people get very polarized, claiming that this is left wing stuff or right wing stuff, while DIY and pragmatism is pushed out of the limelight. And yes, I too see mostly art and stories along with hoped for a better tomorrow. Some of the stories, like YKK, seem to be set in a post apocalyptic era where the human population isreally tiny. In reality a Solarpunk realiy would take absolutely enormous amounts of energy and automation.
>>16789269I agree. The Chobani ad (which was the genesis for many of solarpunk’s current aesthetics) features automatons in a woman’s daily life as well as small-scale community gatherings, implying that it’s either just technologically advanced rural life (probably the ad’s intention) or humanity has had its population reduced somehow but are also able to retain their knowledge and tech. Solarpunk art tends to go in the latter direction. About their politics, I’ve seen differing opinions on anarcho-capitalism, anarcho-communism, eco-fascism, eco-socialism and everything in between; there’s both left and right folks who are solarpunk. DIY and pragmatic ideas are used to repurpose and build community for a “soft revolution” of sorts, where communities are made more self-reliant on themselves and on the surrounding land (think community gardens/farms, creating a community solar grid to store and derive at least a part of power off-grid) slowly from the ground up instead of your average political revolution that almost always goes haywire. This bottom-up approach and community building aspects are core to solarpunk, and by using this along with stories and art they hope to change views in their communities, which in turn can be the catalysts for bigger changes.
When we talk about evidence for non-human intelligences, it helps to rank claims from least to most credible:Weakest are folkloric and anecdotal accounts — myths of “sky people,” abduction narratives, or supposed out-of-place artifacts. They’re culturally interesting but prone to hoaxes, misperceptions, or psychological explanation.Middle tier are astrophysical anomalies. “Oumuamua” accelerated in ways hard to explain, though natural hypotheses exist. The 1977 “Wow!” Signal and certain Fast Radio Bursts sparked speculation, but remain one-off or likely natural. Tabby’s Star once looked like a Dyson sphere candidate, but dust fits better. These remind us the universe holds mysteries, though “aliens” aren’t the default explanation.Stronger are reported physical traces and physiological effects, like claims of exotic alloys or the “Oz effect” during close encounters. Intriguing, but not yet scientifically verified.Strongest evidence comes from multi-sensor, multi-observer military encounters: the 2004 Nimitz “Tic Tac,” 2015 Gimbal, and others. Pilots, radar, infrared, and visual confirmation all line up, showing craft with extraordinary flight profiles that defy current human technology. Importantly, these aren’t fringe claims — the U.S. Department of Defense and NASA openly admit that some UAP remain unidentified after rigorous analysis.In short: the best evidence is not ancient myths or speculation, but instrument-verified data collected by trained observers and acknowledged by official institutions. That doesn’t prove “aliens” — but it does establish that we are confronting a genuine unknown, one that deserves serious study.
>>16783623>>16773399
bump
>>16773383When you get to the top, you realize the central point is that the other person is an ass-hat.Time is a flat circle.
>>16789084Really not sure why you're leaving this much attack surface on yourself, it is freakishly trivial to let you suffer such an illusion.
I have your refutation right here
Our girl debunks Freeman Dyson
>>16789298Were you just not able to comprehend the video? Shit was pretty simple.
>>16789338I comprehended it just fine and summarized it perfectly. Dyson is projecting a concept forward into its natural extreme and she's just clicking her tongue and saying, "Well that's just, like, silly."
>>16789355The video wasn't a takedown of the concept. It was a takedown of a treatment of the concept as exemplified in the Altman clip. She stopped the video multiple times to provide this clarification to try and help people like you. I was wondering who she might be doing that for lol
>>16789178tibee is a dumb larping bitch
>>16789362All Altman was referencing was the potential of future computing demands pushing mankind into space to seek out more robust sources, namely, unfiltered sunlight. However many collectors you build, you might need more..."Dyson Sphere" is just a familiar meme to denote how far that quest could progress. No reason for your simp fixation to get her panties in a knot. But then again, she strikes me as the type who thinks energy production and civilized expansion is "evil" and Greta Thunburg is "relevant"...
I don't know why, but this shit is insanely creepy to me
>>16788772https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=NirnxVtIcRc
>make - S makemake.makelists.txt -B build>cmake makemake.make>./build/makemake.exe
>>16788606Just because they are dark.We are diurnal animals, we need the sun.
>>16788606If you think that's creepy...
What happened Miranda?
>The entire human brain occupies around 1ZB of space>The entire internet occupies around 100ZB of spaceWhy hasn't the internet become conscious yet? It has enough computational power to outperform a brain, so shouldn't it have already surpassed humans by now? How can a computer system with more capacity be dumber? It makes no sense
>>16788386You are fucking retarded.
>>16789122ad hominem
>>16789207Yes.
>>16788374>Why hasn't the internet become conscious yet?You should really consider that your mind isn't cut out for abstract thought. If this sort of thing is liable to come out of your mouth, there is no destination that this kind of thinking is going to bring you to. Movement for movement sake, sure, but if you're expecting to get somewhere you should give up.
>>16788390>tranimebruh
why dont women select for intelligence?
>>16787638and income correlates with intelligence, but selection is always for a broad swathe of traits.
>>16785354That's nice. It encourages me to try dating after all these years. I don't because I'm a shameful neet but I think I look decent and am personable, maybe I should if they don't care that much about my job anyway
>>16787818Lmao you are just making excuses. Women never cared about your job, she makes as much is not more than you anyways. The woman who cares about your job is more interested in something else than in you.
>>16785354Turns out women were the great filter all along.
>>16785358Not correct. Judaism on the other hand leads to these things.
if the big bang made equal parts matter and anti-matter, where did all the anti-matter go?
>>16788963>electroweak epochLambda CDM model says absolutely nothing like this. This is a fabrication of your imagination.
>>16788964>matter was createdLambda CDM model is not an origin model—it says absolutely nothing about how matter was created. It's a model of how the universe changes over time. It does not, and cannot say anything about the origin.
>>16774171>>16785772Notice how he didn't reply kek
QFT says its impossible to create matter from energy, except as in pairs of anti-matter and basically states that you cant create something like a neutron (despite having neutral charge) or any baryon.The idea of some early universe of light creating baryonic matter violates QFT. But thats ok, because we have evidence for QFT and none for some kind of early pure-light universe
>>16773316"if"
Literally and genuinely why are there still apes if we evolved from them?
>>16788761>That’s not what was saidYou denied that it was the same thing as similarity, then came saying it's about "if two structures develop from the same". Homology is just similarity.>Except for how more primitive Archaeocetes like >>16788721 # did have legs for walkingBecause it's a regular animal. It isn't a whale. It's basically a hippo. >and these are the same structure with the same bones just smallerHow do you figure?>>16788785Are you defining any structure towards the back of animal whatsoever as a "leg"? What distinguishes a leg from a non-leg, on your view?
>>16788829>You denied that it was the same thing as similarity, then came saying it's about "if two structures develop from the same”From the same group of cells during development. Finish the sentence instead of deliberately misquoting it. Those don’t mean the same thing at all>It isn't a whaleIt’s an archaeocete… which are whales>How do you figure?Because they’re the same bones? Femur, phalanges, etc>Are you defining any structure towards the back of animal whatsoever as a "leg"?Leg in this case is referring to the hind limbs. What you want to call them makes no difference, they’re the same structure. Cope, seethe, etc. The whales got legs
>noooo don’t evolve aquatic adaptations ur so sexy ahaha
>lacks a solid sacroiliac joint in your path
>>16751729This is no longer an ape thread
Can we have a general on logic? Any logician bros around?
>>16787685explain or gtfo faggot
>>16787496but that's more the domain of explosion
>>16777617Tranny redditors who are depressed and suicidal, but also convinced that THEIR ideology is the correct one for happiness.And they started a logic discord.Lmao
>>16787496Philosophy is retarded.
>>16787496It's a duck. Bunnies don't have ears coming out both from the same side
commie workers' safety editionPrevious Thread: >>16736021This thread exists to ask questions regarding careers associated to STEM.>Discussion on academia-based career progression>Discussion on penetrating industry from academia>Or anything in relation to STEM employment or development within STEM academia!Resources for protecting yourself from academic marxists:>https://www.thefire.org/ (US)>https://www.jccf.ca/ (Canada)Information resource:>https://sciencecareergeneral.neocities.org/>*The Chad author is seeking additional input to diversify the content into containing all STEM fields. Said author regularly views these /scg/ threads.No anons have answered your question? Perhaps try posting it here:>https://academia.stackexchange.com/Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>16789017I mean it's harmonic oscillators all the way down as far as I'm concerned so why not look into structural engineering / acoustic engineering etc. jobs? I'm sure material harmonic resonance and other mechanical engineering adjacent things would hire you. Unless I'm grossly misunderstanding your expertise.
>>16789017Thats why God invented defense contractors.
whats even the point in applying. nothing is coming back. they don't even say why. most of the time they don't even respond.
>>16789176If nothing matters post resume
>bunch of engineers in my department have left in the past year>30% attrition or so>everyone is leaving for better pay conditions>people have been bitching for better pay for at least 2 years>those who haven't left have been actively looking, including myselfIs this an inevitable event? A year or two before I hired on this already happened. Surely they must know that training up an employee costs a shit ton in comparison of just giving raises?
E=MC^2Beat that
>>16786779Nuh uh.
>>167867341 BTC = 10^8 sat1 sat = 1 ccccBTCc = centi
>>16786723>relation for some sort of set if polynomials?The recursive formula for the Fibonacci sequence is defined by F(n) = F(n-1) + F(n-2) for n > 1, with the initial conditions F(0) = 0 and F(1) = 1.
>>16783039
