No nursesNo premedsNo adviceNo psych patients
>>17029858>There's like ~2000 questions on AMBOSS for just IMWas that just for the IM shelf, or IM as a topic? I don't remember there being that many, but maybe I've just repressed those memories. Biggest advice for the IM shelf is to think of every question as being systems based. If there's a multisystem tag for the practice questions, I would make sure to do all of those. >The moment I looked at Step 2 questions, I immediately noticed how much longer the question stems were and how much more minutiae are packed into them as well lol.Yeah they're really trying to bust peoples balls these days. They stopped using the classic buzz words because too many people were just memorizing them, and recently they've started using more H&P style questions where they give you two pages of bullshit formatted like a progress note and you have to sort through what's relevant and what isn't. Don't worry too much about that at this stage though, Step 2 had its share of bullshit but it wasn't nearly as heavy in the esoteric minutiae as Step 1 was imo.
>>17029874>Was that just for the IM shelf, or IM as a topic?It seems like the 2000 is for IM as a topic (the picture on the left). There's a study plan that AMBOSS has that has a more reasonable ~1200 questions (the picture on the left) but I opted to just do randomized blocks picked from the 2000 questions from the IM topic itself since the study plan goes by system and and I don't think I necessarily have time to do everything in time system by system. You can see on the right picture that cardiology is first and I'm worried I won't reach the stuff near the end. My train of thought for now is that I think it's better if I do randomized blocks from the 2000 and then just see from the incorrects which stuff I need to improve upon. AMBOSS has an adaptive QBank mode which I was planning on using for that.
>>17029814It's probably an insurance practice and not a DPC. DPC is the only way. WTF else in medicine is worth it then. working a gorillion hours of week at a hospital under a guy with an MBA who controls your schedule and tells you what to do? no thanks.
>>17027514You're really annoying
>>17030057everyone knows that in 2026 DO > MDAll of the MD schools are rejecting good white applicants and they are being recruited by DO schools instead.
Precisely because it is an observation of nature, but outside the scientific paradigm. So you can shit on your own tits and be a materialist, but I could say to you "I am also a materialist...and these, my friendo, are materialistic observations".How dumb must scientists be? All I did was take the cock that was given to me.https://www.bitchute.com/video/vwArVeJ5ZMcU
>>17027804Fluid dynamics is a form of kabbalistic magick. You aren't looking deeply enough.
>>17002705They’ve reproduced this in lab experiments. Different rotation rates of fluids will trigger different polygonal standing modes.
>>17014233France is full of bees who eat you night, when the wolf come he give threewish and
>>17002705Scientists are the most foolish "smart people" there is.Listen to priests instead.
>>17002737Gnostics are often unreasonably abrasive.
Is it appropriate to give out math lectures dressed like pictured?
>>17030343how can you tell? did you do studies on her skeleton? you are not able to determine bone strength just because you can see the outline through her skin
>>17030346faggot
i accept your consneedsion
>>17030326>>17030317>>17030336>>17030340>>17030343>>17030347Dad and deranged. Allover a women wearing open back outfit and seeing her back muscles. Your father and mother failed you
>>17030317Looks like a normal woman under atrocious florescent lighting that makes pretty much everyone look like a zombie.
Science used scientific method and cast experts spell. It even did musical commercials with over two dozen big name celebrities. The science was very clear: scientifically no gain of function research was done at Wuhan.So what’s this?
>>17030171see >>17030270You're just doing the same shit because you know you're hiding the answers. A google search would enlighten you.
>>17029181>I'm so confused, I'm a newfag on this board. That just says gain of function research was unpaused again, and people could go back to work, and get paid again. Is OP retarded?No you're intentionally being retarded. Look at the dates, Gain of Function research means forcing microbes to gain abilities they did not have before. Wuhan wrote multiple scientific studies on novel Coronavirus before the outbreak. If done in a controlled way, it could be a way to study how microbes gain the ability to reproduce inside human populations, but it wasn't controlled. It was done in China for cheap, it was done someplace that had numerous safety violations, and it happened in the same city that the first patient got infected with Covid-19.Stop being a retard for once in your life, dipshit.
>>17028304>leaked On purpose?
>>17030267For 2+ years you were saying the virus was a nothingburger. Now it's lab enhanced and ultra deadly? Pick a story and stick to it. Otherwise you sound like a butthurt retard making up random nonsense to seethe.
>>17030272SO YOU HAVE ZERO PROOF THAT FAUCIS 0.2% WAS DURING EARLY COVID AND NOT OMNICRON YOU STINKING DILATED TRANNIE LIAR
https://www.science.org/content/article/russia-s-plan-drill-superdeep-holes-arctic-revives-controversial-theory-endless-oilwhat impact would petroleum turning out to be a renewable abiogenic resource have on science?
>>17030259How come people pushing the whole>muh infinite oil because abiotic stuff never mention what the replenishment rate is? Like what would it even matter if it takes 100 million years to replenish?
>>17030294>what the replenishment rate is?well, that has to be considered a hypothesis before it can be tested doesn't it?if abiogenic petroleum gets proven, then people have the incentive to measure replenishment rates
it might be true but i dont know how it can replenish fast enough for our consumption. its a lot of matter to be converted which probably breaks the laws of physics
it's effectively a centrifugal force x surface area of required resource distribution, if true.i think the larger problem is we dont have the materials science to effectively drill down deeper.
>>17030296> then people have the incentive to measure replenishment ratesYou already have the "incentive". If you believe in it invest into an empty oil well yourself. No one does this of course because oil wells do not magically fill up which itself reveals the actual motives. No shill advocating for this ever buys up empty oil wells because they aren't "believers". Instead it's just a rhetoric cudgel. Oil may or may not be abiogenic (we will strongly imply that it is without evidence), thus we will strongly imply and let the reader come to the conclusion that oil is infinite (it wouldn't be even if it was abiogenic) and thus climate change isn't real and you need to give more money to ExxonMobil (which also makes no sense even if oil was abiogenic and infinite). The payday for the shill is not in putting the stuff they peddle to use by investing in empty oil fields with the hope that they magically refill, it's in oil companies paying to spread this nonsense.
>>17022754>>17022783Your brainlets missing the point. Yes, mathematicians want to prove theorems, but its not just the truth of the theorem itself. The construction of theories (definitions, axioms, etc) and the proof of theorems is just as i portant, or even more so, that the theorems themselves. Thats why there are entire fields of math devoted to study proofs and different methods or proving the same result. This isnt even some vague claim or "cope". Theorems themselves are a small part of mathematics, and knowing whether something is true or not without knowing anything else about it, provides a very limited amount of information. This is part of why mathematicians do provide proofs. If theorem were all we were interested in, then math textbooks would just consist of listing true and false statements. At the very least, we're generally interested in the proofs themselves, and usually much more besides that.
>>17030284This. The problem is that these fields that are dedicated to proving theorems are just flooded with crap, now. Almost everyone agrees most of it has become AI generated, and an AI can't verify a proof. It can't prove that an answer was obtained through existing theories or definitions, and it can't be the one to create those theories or definitions. It doesn't live in the real world and can't observe it. Good luck telling Chang and Pajeet that as they upload their 2000th AI-generated paper that day.
i do mathematics research with AI and its pretty slop and pretty good at the same time. I uploaded like 10 books in "My Project" and when I'm stuck I ask something very concise like "I have statement X Y Z D, find all the statements i can make with them across those 10 books+20 papers with page references" and it gives me good enough results. its amazing in this sense, but it write pretty random bs when you are not very concise with the request. it isnt ready to replace mathematicians but more mathematics will be produced
>>17022740Doesn't change how RH is just a convoluted way of seeing primality as it's own pattern due to the rule that makes the prime number set, primes.But then you'll have to excuse me for being the type who holds pure maths in general disdain.
>>17029009>math was createdOr, math is revealed.
Is Sabine's YouTube channel a reputable source of information about new discoveries in science?
>>17030194For example she originally thought Eric Weinstein's jewish theory of everythign was nonsense but then 5 years later talks about how the community was wrong for not taking it seriously despite everyone knowing it was shit
>>17030234>despite everyone knowing it was shitThe guy he debated on the TV didnt even read it and claimed nonsense. What was the name again, Sean Caroll or something. The world renounded String Theorist that was criticizing his work without even reading
>>17030244This rebuttal has been up since 2021: https://files.timothynguyen.org/geometric_unity.pdf and the jew has never even tried to respond because he is a jew grifter. Please don't be retarded there are better people to defend than that jewish fat faggot
>>17030283So now you shift from Sabine to the other guy to discredit Sabine? wow
>>17030289>So now you shift from Sabine to the other guy to discredit Sabine? wowWhat are you talking about? The guy asked for an example and I gave one. Then the conversation shifted to him protecting Weinstein after which I expanded my position on the jew faggot. Obviously Sabine is nowhere near the jew in terms of grifting but her latest content isn't great. Too many retards on this board nowadays.
Is AI actually making a big difference in math, or is it just corpo faggots hyping things up to impress the investors?
Both. Corpo faggots do that for a living. Elizabeth Holmes for example. But even the funding game is changing now. If you are good at math, and can use AI then you are now better at math.
>>17029938Most discoveries in math using AI has been with teams of people who already had an axiom in place and used AI to write its proof. It's not like it took research from 100 different authors and wrote its own paper.
>>17030248>If you are good at math, and can use AI then you are now better at math.Do AI faggots really believe this shit? The real problem is the tech-illiteracy around AI has made people believe that it is a magic spell, and that because they don't understand it, it must be doing something to make things 'better'. The people saying this never being able to quantify it because they don't get it, either.
>>17030257For advanced maths you can do things and calculate things that are difficult to do in your head and write down. Calculators make 99% of people better at math. So of course Ai is gonna make you better at Math is you are good at Math and AI.
>>17030257I don't claim to get the details, but here's Tao using AI:https://chatgpt.com/share/6a5fdc7a-d6f8-83e8-bbea-8deb42cfed56
Why did (male) scientists come up with the theory that women care more about intelligence and money rather than looks, while freely admitting that looks matter the most in women?I've seen multiples studies refuting that looks in men arent the most important (as if they were necessary), and they always say that they're surprised and that "more research is needed" and "the relationships are more complex than previously thought"What's the science behind this?
>>17028811So, if someone is renting your girl friend out, obviously they wouldn't want you included as someone to be considered. So, they could arbitrarily pick any attribute that you have and just say not that. You're not tall? Tall guys only, problem solved. Sure, there is going to be some. guy that has gotten a big growth spurt using leg lengthening surgeries, and don't forget growth hormone for someone's kid to also rent your girl friend as well. Pick a skin color, and skin color can be changed as well. Your jester nice guy is not someone who is renting your girl friend. Someone who rents your girl friend can not be a nice guy. It can be specifically not you.
>>17028811self reported data is garbage, every scientist knows this. also talk vs action can be very different so there's no value in asking people about their preferences, people lie to others and even themselves. but universities are also politically correct places, in 2026 maybe the most politically correct, so the academics that are aware of this stuff just stay quiet, especially if it's not related to their field. >>17028852>attractive people attract members of the opposite sex I too figured this out in high school (observation-iq 200 apparently). none of this blackpill or dating app data has ever been interesting to me. I've always looked at it and sarcastically thought "no kidding?"
>>17028687because science for the past century has been nothing but propaganda spewing MEN BAD WOMEN GOOD.
>>17030288it's worse than you make it out to be, that's the problem https://youtu.be/Dwf-hXaKBSIwhat do you think happens when 90% of men realise they're pussyless because women today have the option to do chad or nothing
That movie Obsession convinced me that women hate men but also want to be hurt by men.
PGP is broken. Discrete log based cryptography is obsolete. I have extensive technical expertise while also under Five Eyes surveillance for the past 4 months. They have a quantum supercomputer based on Spontaneous Parametric Downconversion which entangles 2^N photons starting with a gamma laser beam via a cascade of N nonlinear optical crystals (each halving the frequency while doubling the total number of entangled photons) for a total of 20 million qubits per quantum core. Bear in mind that government tech is 10 years ahead of the private sector. Current discrete log cryptographic schemes & hashing algorithms are obsolete due to Schor's and Grover's algorithms.Gas station vapes are also compromised. There are photomultipliers underneath the screens (top left & bottom right as a small circle with dot @ center). Photomultiplier arrays also exist in public restrooms, e.g. Walmart. Close range interferometry. Focusing is unnecessary (AI can clean up the defocused image). Exabytes of child pornography sharded across data centers & collected to have kompromat on every US citizen.
>>17029671Let this be a cautionary advisory. Do not post this nonsense again.
>>17029671The 5G network is essential for signal amplification & data throughput: phones, suspicious hotspots, routers, etc.
>Gas station vapes are also compromisedTHIS IS NOT A DRILL
>>17030101It really isn't
>>17029671Why hasn’t Fives Eyes stolen my 0.003 BTC
Since there is no stupid question that doesn't deserve its own thread. . . Thread I am going to post a question here and it's dumb.How come on humid days my laundry in the dryer actually dries, meanwhile on bright sunny dry days it stays damp at the end of the cycle and I have to put more time in? I am baffled
>>17029536Absolute moisture on a cool humid day could be lower than on a hot dry day which is what the machine cares about since it heats up the air anyways.
>>17029557Oh so it's endothermic because it is cooler outside on the rainy day the hot air will be leaving easier. I guess that makes sense.
>>17029615It could also be the sensor that detects when its dry takes longer to detect the dryness on humid days.
>>17029536the moist air acts as a hydro conductor and grounding plane which makes it easier to remove the water from your clothes
>The water content capacity of air increases exponentially with temperature. Warmer air molecules possess higher kinetic energy, allowing them to sustain more water vapor before condensation occurs. Specifically, for every 10°C increase in temperature, the air’s moisture-holding capacity roughly doubles.
Why are people losing faith in science?
>>17027447>1. Normalcy: We've gotten so used to greatly reducing the harmful microbiome in our food and not dying from simple childhood illness that we're socially reversing course on pasteurization and vaccination. What good is achievement when its pearls before swine?Lol, no one cares about your cretinous, dysgenic shit kids that should have died during childbirth. Immunological health correlates to neurological health.
>>17027447>1. Normalcy: We've gotten so used to greatly reducing the harmful microbiome in our food and not dying from simple childhood illness that we're socially reversing course on pasteurization and vaccination. What good is achievement when its pearls before swine?We solved this by just bathing regularly. Everything else after is a placebo effect.>2. Outright denial of evopsych. If we can't admit to people that the sky is blue, how can we get them to trust us on anything else?Evopsych is tautological and impossible to objectively analyze.
Who is losing faith in science? It probably affects everyones lives more than any other topic. A bunch of people are trying to, I am not even sure but they are trying to make their gender studies degrees a useful degree by denying science. But if everyone lost faith in science then we'd be dead within a few years or it would be something like that idiocy film.
>>17016779>>17017178Probably because "Science" as a discipline has been used as a catch-all term to mean "the experts agree". Shut the fuck up about the experts already, Expert consensus has never created scientific consensus. Expert consensus got Galileo put under house arrest and forced to declare that the Sun revolved around the Earth. Fuck you and the cult of "Science", shithead.>MUH PETER THIEL See? Here's another cult of science shithead doing CIA tactics of involving random conspiracy personalities we're supposed to know are le bad and saying all criticism is coming from them and an army of sock puppets. Science can't hide its proof behind an army of spooks, it has to prove all of its axioms and you've failed spectacularly.
>ctrl+f faith>1/29>>17030273>>17016813>>17017178It's even more baffling that we're expected to have "Faith" in science. No, respect in scientific method is earned, you don't have faith in it. You see the steps and verify the steps. The fact it must have "Faith" means the science we're seeing today is completely fraudulent. You can't listen or believe in science. Faith is earned, not given. As is respect. None of the institutions who proclaim to be experts in science have earned Faith or Respect. They're just a church wearing science's face as a mask
Man, you guys suck.I was just having a conversation with ChatGPT about hybridization between humans and other animal species. I asked it if one were to take a sperm cell or an egg from a person with either XXYY, XXXY, or XXXX syndrome and then taken a sperm cell or egg from a chimpanzee and used in vitro fertilization... whether or not it would produce a human-chimpanzee hybrid. It explained to me very eloquently why that would not work. I asked you guys over ten years ago if this was possible and you just made cracks about my mental disability!Fuck you, /sci/!
>>17028934/sci/ are naive enough to believe monke from Africa is their ancestor, so imagine my shock.
>I asked you guys over ten years ago if this was possible and you just made cracks about my mental disability!They didn't make fun of you.https://warosu.org/sci/thread/5043100https://warosu.org/sci/thread/5977906
>>17030089You're missing a thread!
>>17030235You are right. Sorry.https://warosu.org/sci/thread/6662776
>>17030254Wrong one. Also not mine.
Gravity is real and Einstein is full of shit.It is only analogous to acceleration for point particles in perfectly uniform fields (which are pretty much equivalent to fields that don't exist) - making equivalence principle a circular logic - "if I make my system equivalent then it's equivalent".In any more complex system than the above gradient of the gravitational field can be detected and measured due to the tidal forces it causes.
>>17030220And? Is there a deadline we're supposed to meet? Shareholders we need to obey? Someone in HR we need to appease? No there fucking isn't. The work is just hard, that's all. You and clearly most people don't have the stomach for this kind of thing. You're just weak and lazy and need instant gratification. You can't pass the marshmallow test. That's all your complaints amount to, a childish lack of patience.
>>17030236At least you admit its slow as fuck while other fields progressed 10 times as fast.>>17030236>The work is just hard, that's all.Its impossible even since GR is flawed from its postulates on. You have to get rid of GR or you will never unify.
>>17030239>At least you admitWhat is there to admit in a line of work that is fundamentally built on the idea that one starts from ignorance and seeks answers? >hurr other fields behave differentlyand? and??? Finish your line of reasoning, I can't read your mind. >It's impossible"The work" isn't referring specifically to any individual model you mistakenly believe to be some sort of sacred cow. It's referring to pic related:>>17030202
>>17030240>and? and???Well it shows something is different or broken with physics and i argue number 2.>impossibleThat was my opinion to be honest.
>>17030262>Well it shows something is differentClearly >or broken with physics and I argue number 2Because you have no concept of rigor and are thus too easily discouraged by hardship to ever be capable of providing valuable insight into anything. >>impossible>That was my opinion to be honest.>"If one model becomes obsolete the entire field is brokenYou have nothing valuable to say on this topic.
So a year ago or so i did the mensa.no internet test and got 135, being an easily exitable moron i was fully convinced this might be true to some extent, and that infact i was a unrealised genius!. A cocoon not aware it could become a butterfly. So i checked out when you could take the supervised test in my town and signed up for it. 40€ they wanted those bastard but me thinking this was my chanse to make it big i payed like a good boy. When there did the test and about a month later the test results came giving me an 119! IQ point not fucking close to getting in. And as im now quite some time later realising is that this is probably how those pompus pricks fund their little operation, baiting in midwits to pay the midwit tax. >tl;drDont write the mensa admission test its a ploy to steal your money
>>17028324If you believe psychometrics is science that alone makes you a midwit at best
>>17029164I feel like midwit is not a thing, there are people who understand epistemology and people who don't. This is unrelated to intelligence, which doesn't matter outside of repetitive task completion from instruction.
>>17029183Obviously point is OP needs to sit down and read an epistemology for dummies book.
>>17028321How am I supposed to feel any empathy for you?
The second hand accounts of Mensa don't make it sound to great anyway. A lot of them are hard core puzzle addicts and one guy said all most of them do is talk about being in Mensa a lot. I even read one account where these guys were doing puzzles while waiting for the tests so sounds like a bunch of super autists.
