Can you extract energy by making heat flow from a cold surface to a hotter one?There is a limit of absolute zero so no energy is created in this way.
>>17089724>heat flow from a cold surface to a hotter one?Isn't that basically just electricity, resistance of charge (ie heat) from a cold (-) terminal to a hotter (+) one over time leading to a current (A) creating a voltage (V) that produces energy (E) as a direct product of charge (Q) and voltage (V) E=QV or E=(V^2/R)/t with resistence (R) over time (t)?The energy equation based on voltage is (V^2/R)/t
>>17089724reverse Peltier?
>>17089726that's like removing heat from data servers in space.
>>17089724>heat flow from a cold surface to a hotter onenot how heat works
>>17089724you need a demon for that
How will the scientific community react when there is irrefutable evidence that contradicts the last 50 years of science?will they try to ignore it or pretend that knew all along?
>>17089896What are you referring to in terms of “the last 50 years of science”? String theory started in 1968 so that is 8 years over your deadline. Please be specific on what you are referring to that came about since late 1976
>>17089929yeah more like over 100 years because even with Bell's theory in 1964, it's a direct mathematical expansion of Albert Einstein’s 1935 thought experiment regarding quantum entanglement.
>>17089933so you think all science over the last 100 years has been nothing? and you ate typing this on what, a telegraph or something?
>>17089929>String theory started in 1968 so that is 8 years over your deadline.Yes and the various models of Quantum Science have also still been going on for the past 50 years despite starting before the deadline.>came about since late 1976I never said that, I said "The last 50 years of science is a bunch of contradictory theories that haven't quite panned out because each one requires a scale of ultra-precise sub-nano measurement that we still won't be able to achieve for another 50 years if ever." Learn to read more closely and stop trying to editorialize and insert a bunch of hallucination while you read.
>>17089936That is a result of engineering, not science, ancient peoples could also engineer marvels and migrate across the globe despite their scientific knowledge being completely retarded.
Esteemed physicist Eric Weinstein claims that billionaire venture capitalist Marc Andreessen was told by the White House that the government has purposefully stagnated physics research. He was told that during the cold war entire areas of physics were classified and taken out of research communities and those fields went dark and never advanced. They also said they may do the same thing to AI. What physics do you think they've hidden and classified?x.com/newstart_2024/status/1975316849207529940
>>17089894they could do it with technology that wouldn't guarantee supremacy but would cause a lot of headaches. or technology which they understand has some interesting outcome but they cannot crack it, thus they risk enemy would crack it before them, or technology that needs other tech developed first before they can use it or develop it further.there's no legitimate reason to bury science if it offers more power over everyone else. makes no sense.
>>17089912yes anon. I agree that China should be spending all its money on chasing vaporware hype at the level of trillions of dollars. Unironically that would be good for the economy
>>17089914let’s take standard fission nuclear energy as an example. It was rolled out hardcore from the 60s-80s. We had the Simpsons on national TV where the Nuclear Powerplanf was where everyday dad Homer was supposed to be employed.Around the exact same time we had a major handbrake pulled on nuclear energy because of Chernobyl and Three Mile Island, The development got stopped in its tracks because of the soviet system causing a massive idiocy clusterfuck, and then the US realized it was in their interest to cause a similar anti-nuclear hysteria (albeit less so) here as well. The entire advancement of the energy infrastructure was halted in place and we rolled back to WWI technology on a dime. All because it was favorable to a certain configuration of geopolitical king-makers.Nuclear energy for sure was one of those things where the elites stopped it from gaining traction, and the science has been stagnating for years as a result
>>17089922>Nuclear energy for sure was one of those things where the elites stopped it from gaining traction, and the science has been stagnating for years as a resultyeah so you can sell oil to everyone.you are conflating technology for science. the science never stopped. fission science has been researched and understood and even applied, albeit at smaller scale. the sabotage risk isn't worth the gains from it. when again, plenty oil to sell around.harder to sell nuclear power plants. and once sold they're good for tens of years. where oil just burns up. so you constantly sell it.
>>17089915if it's vaporware then they won't chase it, obviously.but if it isn't...we're not even into the neuromorphic phase of this tehnology, that's yet to come. baby steps atm but it's heading there.what happens now is nothing lol. things are just getting started in this AI domain. if I had to guess I'd say the crazy shit is yet to come
Now that the Democrats have control of congress
>>17086079they cannot fathom a more involved solution to their problem. they have a hammer and every problem looks like a nail for the chimp.their solution offers temporary relief (if even) but they're guaranteed fucked longer term. such is the weakling mind.
>>17086084Sad!
>>17085740Crap (said in a Chinese accent)
>>17085740China would make me a home. You guys wouldn't. I consider them up on you.
But what about India, sirs. Where are we (superpower by 2027) in this race??
Friendly reminder:>DO NOT SELL DRUGSGeneral advice:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ygVMTAp9JBs
>>17089106our pharmacists are vital members of the team and remind us of pharmacology shit that everyone forgets. i hear that the field is saturated though.PAs are similarly vital for taking the load off of surgeons so they can focus on cases. or you could be one of those faggy primary care PAs.
>>17089111>go to medical school just to make the same amount as a california nursebecoming a physician after being denied residency for high paying specialties is a sign of failure.
>>17089106pharmacists are way oversaturated and not worth it. even though it's not as good as being a doctor, NP (slightly less so PA) would likely be the most efficient medical field to go into imo.
>>17087638>>17088852You two retards should be the ones with the inferiority complex, talk to literally anyone in 2026 and they will all tell you they prefer DOs. A major part is that is precisely because of the ivory tower look at me I'm a big MD egotistical attitude you have in your post. DOs take the harder path to becoming a physician. You really think the MCAT and organic chemistry has anything to do with being good at medicine at all? DOs take COMLEX and USMLE and have to do hundreds of hours of osteopathic lab. Send an MD back to the middle ages and they literally could not do anything to treat patients. If an MD had no drugs or labs they're useless. That is not true for a DO. Also most of the MD schools nowadays are DEI hell holes and DO schools end up taking the competent young white men the MD schools reject in favor of black transgender lesbians. Just go ahead and look at the names or pictures from MD schools VS DO schools, all the young white conservative men are going to DO schools and tranny activists, jews, blacks, and women go to MD schools.
>>17089106What are you even looking for? There's a ton of opportunities in health IT, biotech and pharmaceuticals that only retards shuttle themselves into the same healthcare pipelines.Nursing is already getting saturated, and most people are priced out of MD/DO. Pharmacy has been oversaturated for years, and most of the allied health fields are bullshit degrees with 100k+ tuition.Skip the lines and look at fields that are selling the shovels in the current healthcare boom.
>>17089783Not saying its not a grift, but once the trials confirm it, the date of the cure is still the date of the actual initial discovery, not the date that bureaucrats signed off on it many years later.
>>17089783Breaking news: rhino horn salesman says rhino horns make you smarter, younger, more attractive to women.
>>17089807this but unfortunately most people are incredibly stupid and will fall for it, especially legislators and regulators (the money helps)
As the age old adage goes - "Never trust a single word that comes out of a jew's mouth."
Dario is getting more cringe by the day. A cancer cure in 10 years? Really he has the balls to make this claim? Seems like a hail-mary to juice up his IPO buxx at the 10 yard line, if you ask me
Was he just stupid?
>>17089880Yes, exactly. The point is contesting the idea that whatever is positive is necessarily positive.
>>17089895To legitimately play the numbers in the lottery, you do need to choose a necessarily positive play, but the entire point of the lottery is that only a very very small percent of the positive plays will positively win and you are conflating the property of playability with winning.
>>17089897No I'm not, you are doing the conflating.Lottery is just one example. If it's going to be rainy tomorrow afternoon, "brings an umbrella to work" is a positive property. This is distinct from the property "knows that an umbrella is the smart thing to bring when it rains", which is also positive of course.
>>17089899>>17089897Oh, and of course, it is not at all modally necessary that lottery tickets are labelled with numbers instead of zoomer slang. In a world where "1, A, skibidi, toilet, lottery, winning#" is a typical lottery label, "knows to play 1, A, skibidi, toilet, lottery, winning#" would be positive
>>17089899>No I'm not, you are doing the conflating.What am I conflating with what? I am trying to separate positive play with positive win since you seem to be implying that any positive play should positively win, but the winning being would be the one with both positive properties, not just one. If you are still supporting the original premise: >>17086118 > "Knows to play 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 in the lottery" is positive but only if those are indeed the winning lottery numbersThen you are definitely conflating positive play with positive win, if you aren't supporting that premise then you have lost track of the conversation and I don't even really understand what you are trying to argue.
What is the appeal of being a doctor in 2026? Surely there is an upside besides pay right
>>17089094two words anon: anti vaxxers
>>17088540you can still get rich of retards with gender dysphoriahttps://m.youtube.com/watch?v=XOB5syfDOB0&ra=m
>>17088540Many years ago the doctors were in charge, were paid well. Slowly the insurance companies wrestled control away now the doctors need teams of admin people to fill out paperwork hoping the insurance company will approve the required treatment and drugs. Also the drug and medical device (MRI and other type equipment) made the equipment very expensive and needing lots servicing, together with drugs and insurance the cost of seeing a doctor and treatment is very expensive and the doctors work much harder for less money. It really just about extracting as much money from patients as possible while doctors try to provide care.
>>17088540Well there are hundreds of thousands of doctors throughout history who maimed, mutilated or even accidentally killed their patients, there might be something worthwhile in striving to not be one of them. If you genuinely helped every patient I think the career could be rewarding on a spiritual level but I doubt its feasible to do that. Maybe a small town family doctor in a rural area could have something like that
>>17088540being able to cut people open and get bloody and touch organs and bloody wounds and stitch people up and guts and disease and bear witness to the suffering and fragility of the human organism
How do I avoid getting cancer?
>>17087177Try reading up on...>Deciphering the Warburg Effect: Metabolic Reprogramming, Epigenetic Remodeling, and Cell Dedifferentiation>https://www.annualreviews.org/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-cancerbio-062822-120857...to see why this doesn't really work, and cancers just switch to fuels besides sugars.
>>17085605brvtalpeople assume they will embrace the void permanently upon death but it's wishful thinking
>>17086896Have fun eating rotten shit, retard wino.
>>17081365Nice cat
>>17085605Good thing that the probability of the exact same configuration of matter coalescing again is zero, so you only have to go through this shit once.
I am trying to quit Arabic stuff
>>17089361[math]\frac{\mathrm{I}}{\pi} = \frac{\mathrm{II}\sqrt{\mathrm{II}}}{\overline{\mathrm{IX}}\,\mathrm{DCCCI}}\sum_{k=\mathrm{N}}^{\infty}\frac{(\mathrm{IV}\cdot k)!\,\left(\mathrm{MCIII} + \overline{\mathrm{XXVI}}\,\mathrm{CCCXC}\cdot k\right)}{(k!)^{\mathrm{IV}}\;\mathrm{CCCXCVI}^{\mathrm{IV}\cdot k}}[/math]
>>17089439this is what those "I used to like maths until they replaced the numbers for letters" guys fear the most
>>17089439Kill it with fire now.
>>170893610.CMXCIX. . . = I
>>17089629CM / M + XC / M + IX / M... = I.
the paradox: there was so much matter on universe it annihilated antimatter and still there was enough matter to form a universenow antimatter can never exist for long because when it encounters matter it gets annihilatedlets call matter "the right side"antimatter is "the left side"how is this connected to lifeforms?well all protein biomolecules in nature are made from left-hand amino acidsthere is no right hand (chemically they are stable and can be made in a lab but they wont appear in lifeforms)>this handedness in life is the result of matter-antimatter paradox we just dont understand the math behind it all but it is what it is
>>17080622kitty cat
>>17080622https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QhWzn95-XE4
>>17080622Chemical chirality has nothing to do with antimatter you dumb fuck.
>>17089799The Last of Us probably had scientists playing with mirror fungi. Imagine only making one mirror batch to kill everyone.
>>17080778> /sci/ - Non-stop Retarded Pseud Shit
I'm starting to think space is fake. can any anons give me the low down. also none of that flat earth pilpul because I've seen the horizon with my own eyes.
>>17081129>DUDE WE ARE SO FUCKING INSIGNIFICANT>therefore communism and sing kumbaya around the fireSagan (a jew) can't possibly be acting in good faith when he says things like this.
>>17079897And magically even enemy nations work together to hold up the "space is fake" conspiracy.You're so fucking retarded it hurts.
>>17086505But without the air quotes and the only the magic trick is deception, that's the main game here. Freemasonry.
>>17085670youre intentionally trying to poison the well most likelybut why?
>>17079897>I've seen the horizon with my own eyes.but did you really?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4LI5sU_LWDUwhy still horizon? becouse light still bend toward earthhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sft3QYZjNCU
A jewish engineer walks into a bar
>>17084689mad.
>>17084665Oops, joke got cut off. supposed to be>A jewish engineer walks into a bar and goes straight to the atm>He says you owe me 1.3%please clap
Why was six nervous?
>>17087665cuz 789Why were six nervous?
>>17084665TKDFuck IsraelFuck the JewsTKD can't come soon enough
In history, new viruses like HIV and ebola came from Africa, and recently the coronavirus from Wuhan. But why in a country that doesnt observe any from of higiene and where people roll in filth and overpopulation all day no new horrible virus or disease has been generated?
>>17088235new viruses come from bongistan and then they blame some random country, guess they're soft toward india
>>17088235>In history, new viruses like HIV and ebola came from Africa, and recently the coronavirus from Wuhan.Animal reservoirs and cross contamination. Unless you go full "kill all the forests/wildlife" like most of Europe and the US there will always been avenues of exposure and cross contamination. The first infected person in the West Africa 2015 outbreak was a kid who ate a fruit an infected bat merely pricked.
>>17088261>high trust societiesYou mean trust in the government or that gay ass "trust" in other people slop losers like to throw around as a catch all?
>>17089694kys
>>17089694Exhibit A:
It is beyond OWAR at this point, things never imagined before are habbening.
formalising is a more rigourous task than formalizing thoughbeit
>>17089355what is even the point of trying to “formalize” Wiles’ proof? Is it to make sure it is right even moreso than the fact that it is widely accepted and celebrated for decades in the math community?Even if there are still people who doubt Wiles’ proof then I can’t imagine having some AI-generated Lean formalization helps anybody to resolve their doubts. It’s already been well-understood that AI can’t faithfully translate accepted math proofs into Lean representations, so that is already a sticking point. But beyond that, and more importantly, I don’t think anybody in math actually gains any additional understanding of proofs, or basically anything, from having some Lean code put in front of them. That’s probably infinitely worse than just going and rereading Wiles and trying to explain it like a normal human mathematician in normal human math, instead of Lean which helps nobody
>>17089360I suppose the idea is that you learn something from a bunch of humans trying to formalize it.
>>17089360>It’s already been well-understood that AI can’t faithfully translate accepted math proofs into Lean representationsgee, perhaps this is why Anthropic demonstrated that AI can formalize about 30k theorems in 13 million lines of Lean code?
>>17089794gee, how does that respond to my post at all? how do we know those 13 million lines actually are faithful translations of the human math proofs? I can guarantee you there isn’t a team of mathematicians working through 13 million lines of useless AI slop codemore likely Anthropic asked Claude “are you totally sure this is AOK?” and claude was like “yeah. trust me bro” and Dario was like “werks4me, IPO here we come”
