If the Gödelian sentence corresponds to an actual statement about arithmetic that is proven to be true outside of the lower-level formal system, then maybe we can just map any math conjecture to a more complicated version of the Gödelian sentence by reverse engineering the Gödel numbering and proving a theorem to be true without actually proving it. We just state the theorem and then say “and this is unprovable” and then we know it’s true. Math is literally so easy.
Too bad Gödel was a fraud
>>17004511nigga, Gödelian sentences are the trivial casehttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goodstein's_theorem>This was the third example of a true statement about natural numbers that is unprovable in Peano arithmetic, after the examples provided by Gödel's incompleteness theorem and Gerhard Gentzen's 1943 direct proof of the unprovability of ε0-induction in Peano arithmetic.>The Paris–Harrington theorem gave another example.>>17004557chew on my sphincter
>>17004570>goodstein sequenceoof.https://jamesrmeyer.com/infinite/goodstein>Paris–Harrington theoremdouble oof.>Roughly speaking, Jeff Paris and Leo Harrington (1977) showed that the strengthened finite Ramsey theorem is unprovable in Peano arithmetic by showing in Peano arithmetic that it implies the consistency of Peano arithmetic itself. Assuming Peano arithmetic really is consistent, then by Gödel's second incompleteness theorem, Peano arithmetic cannot prove its own consistency. This shows that Peano arithmetic cannot prove the strengthened finite Ramsey theorem.So it literally just follows from Gödel. Too bad both are wrong.
>>17004584>james r meyerAH, sorry, i though you had a functioning brainhttp://r6.ca/blog/20090218T025048Z.html
>>17004584 >>17005157AND just in case you are a lazy faggot to boothttp://r6.ca/Goedel/FFGITReview.html
>Speed of light is 299 792 458 m / s>If 1 meter was redefined as 0.999308193 m it would lead to light being perfectly 300,000,000 m/s>shorter by about 0.069% (≈ 0.692 mm).The creation of a meter is a great idea, and it's a unit that is on the scale that humans can work with. however, we got painfully close to getting it to be a perfect clean fraction of the speed of light, and we didn't know at the time it's the perfect thing to base measurements off of since it's a universal constant. The difference between this "light speed meter" and the real meter is imperceptible to the average person, but would result in a nice clean number for the speed of light. No one knows the speed of light off hand. This way everyone would.
>>17003120these people vote
Maybe abolishing Imperial units everywhere would be a better start.
>>17004925There's the case that "time is an illusion", because it may be an emergent property of the universe rather than a proper force that we can study and analyze directly like the weak nuclear force or whatever. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YycAzdtUIkoWe may need a quantum theory of gravity to even begin to think about and talk about these things, and they've been trying to do that since the god damn 30s without much hope. This actually goes back to Einstein and relativity - though commonly explained that "clocks slow down", it isn't true. The speed of light never slows down and neither do clocks. It's just that two frames of reference moving at different speeds may differ in how they record time. Since we can't measure whatever underlying "mechanism" lies behind time, this is all we have, and all we can meaningfully talk about. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F_eVrN8Z8gM
>>17004932I recommend you to study Lorentzian aether theory. Then your confusion will lower. Because all clocks absolutely slow down when moving (relativ to the aether). It's not some magical complicated thing neighter,it follow from the aether wind. And time is real, its always progressing and you never can influence something in the past. Even tho we can't really quantify it.
>>17004269>>17004405>>17004929hello professor dave/flint dibble, how are your Dr. Fauci TM buttplugs treating you today?
>it's been called the most profound equation in all of mathematicsI don't get it
>>17001722Because 1 pi = 1 pi. It's our rational number systems which are the problem. In base pi, pi is a perfect 10.
>>17004868Base pi isn't a valid numerical system, though, if it were you would be able to count from 1 to 10 in pi steps since that is how base-x systems work 1 to 10 in x number of steps, but pi steps is impossible or you would just do it instead of coping and seething indefinitely.Even if it were, there would still be irrational numbers in its base, anything that could be converted to a rational value in any other base would still be irrational in base-pi because pi would still have an irrational relationship to them.
>>17005098>you would be able to count from 1 to 10 in pi stepsIf you could, then base 10 would be itself an irrational base related to Pi.You could totally imagine a universe that would have made it possible to count on circle length : A culture that would have invented the maths based on wheel.Picrel obviously.If Pi was the unity "1", then the new "Pi" would be the circle's diameter : Di.
>>17005129>You could totally imagine a universe that would have made it possible to count on circle length :Didn't we do that in this universe and call it 360 degrees.
>>17005133>and call it 360 degrees.Then convert your 360 degrees in the new "Di" (as in Diameter) constant.Remember that in human universe, we start from the diameter, then you draw a circle around that diameter.Pi = Circle/DiameterIn "wheelmaths" you have to start from the circle, then you draw the diameter.Circle is "1", your diameter would be 1(basePi)/360(base10)or converted in basePi (Di is Diameter) :Di(basePi)/1(basePi) with "1" not our unity but an irrational one.
>all of the sciences got started because magicians studied a bunch of weird shit trying to predict next planting seasons weather>science can put men on the moon, turn lead into gold, make men fly, cure men of most ills, make images move>science STILL cant reliably tell me what the weather will be two weeks from now 7000 years laterEmbarrassing STEMfags, you've failed desu desu.
>>16988429>Obviously you've never seen the big pyramids in person. They are strikingly precise.What a retard
I like woo woo :)
>>16988429They're physically impressive, which lead to you being physically impressed. Nice. That's not exactly proof, the gut is easily tricked.
Just solve the Navier stokes and the accuracy of weather forecasting will multiply 10x, plus you'll probably win a million dollars.
>>16988202Bro, I could totally tell what the weather will be 2 weeks from now 7000 years from now.
What are the best anti aging things we currently have? I'm currently using 0.05% tretinoin, 50SPF sunscreen, hyaluronic acid, argireline and doing intermittent fasting in an 8 hour window
>>17002890Anyone know what his anti-aging routine is?
We used to have a cellular reprogramming general but it died, while these threads pop up weekly>ProtocolIt's a two step process, first500mg Curcumin500mg or so TributrynTake about a dropper full of B12.Wait an hour.Then, think of this as a balanced dose to start the reaction.300mg Liposomal ApigeninAnother 500mg of TributrynAbout 500mg of either NAD or some combo of NAD and NMN.And stack that combo of Apigenin, Tributryn, and NAD/NMN 2-4+ times in a day. One week on one week off to avoid T cells exhaustion. Ultimately this is your immune system first reprogramming itself and then going out to the rest of you. The T cells are able to identify cell wall markers where issues are the most severe and those will need to be targeted first before any specific issue. Give it a little wiggle room if you don't need as much NAD or Tributryn. NAC is a good add in as well while doing this if you have a history of smoking or lung problems.
>>170051042/2Problem factors:>epigenetic damage accrues over time>immune weakening with age gives a pathway to overloading the system>pre-cancer mutation risks increase with age>limitations of effectiveness through dose course, paper doesn't provide guidelines for tapering cycles, scaling down cycles as the count increases, or general long term treatmentThis basically means that the older, and not age specific but more damaged via poor lifestyle choices, a person is the more likely they require shorter, weaker courses with more limited effect.High dosing on Yamanaka-factor activation has probable side effects of reencoding bad cells, leaving apoptosis delayed on cells that require it, causing immune overactivation leading to development of or worsening of arthritis, and immune system wearout leaving the participant susceptible.What this requires is some factorization for age and body condition, individually, and an approach that understands the method is generally uncontrolled and limited in scope. Only so much can be "reversed", and only so much can be taken without the risks of inducing much worse things than just getting older.As a very basic example of what I'm discussing:If for a perfectly healthy 25 year old, 1000mg of combined treatment for 3 weeks is prudent and effective, 500mg of chemicals for 4 weeks for a 35 year old is prudent. And then you want to taper the dose to end a treatment (cycle) over 2-3 weeks, give hte body 8 weeks to rest, and start a new cycle on 2/3rds the chemical amount. Etc.etc.
>>17004653wtf, is this real?
I was about to give a big breakdown of anti aging science but looking at your "stack" your interest is looksmaxxing rather than longevity (which is gay and retarded.) The best solution for you is probably just to die young so you never have to suffer the indignity of looking old and ugly. Checking out at 24 is the ultimate looksmax.
AMOC collapse has started.
you can't pump all that shit into the air and expect nothing to happen, but honestly humanity has been so wrong and faggy about the issue that we kinda deserve to suffer, so...
>>17003991>1978>AHHHHHH GLOBAL COOLINGwhile a few people did posit that the earth might start cooling, those were always in the minority, as meta studies show. Some media did latch onto it and blow it out of proportion, because the job of newspapers is to sell newspapers, and finding something that goes against the grain always sells well. These articles are now paraded in climate change denial circles to do the exact same thing you're doing. But it's just the same old shit like digging up old tabloid articles that talk about out of place artifacts to claim the Grand Canyon was built by Egyptians or some shit>2026>AHHHHHH GLOBAL COOLINGWait, do you know what the word "global" means?
>>17004291>I pretty sure the agricultural havoc is plenty motivation followed by a wave of emigration/immigration that will make the migrant crisis look like baby-town frolickYou would fucking think, huh?On that note it's also kinda funny, how fighting climate change isn't a right wing talking point. What's more patriotic than preserving your beautiful country, nipping future immigration in the bud and becoming energetically independent from some middle eastern petrochemical exporters?I know the answer is lobby interests, but still
>>17004265>You niggas don't understand how much the climate in Europe has changed in the last 20 yearsWhich makes it doubly insane how recently keep seeing posts from people here claiming "oh it's called summer snowflake, it's always been like this". Bitch, I'm not even quite 30 yet and I remember when they've canceled school at 30˚C, we even had a schoolyard rhyme about it. Now we're pushing 40˚C next week and I live in the cooler outskirts of town.Not to mention winters. This January was the first time in years that snow stayed for more than a single day. I was surprised to see kids these days even owned sleds, considering they would have been useless for almost the past decade.
>>17002831>>17002851I think the media is also to blame, they don't give a shit about the societal damage they do as long as they can pump out some sensationalist headlines.Also people fail to realize that many of those predictions assumed that no climate action would be taken and governments at least put a little effort into reducing carbon emissions, so the fact that some of those predictions didn't come true is actually due to people taking them seriously and doing something to prevent them.It's like calling your doctor an idiot for saying you'd have health complications if you don't change your lifestyle after changing your lifestyle based on his warnings
> create the world's largest circular collider> multi million dollar project> spans two countries> repeats the same experiment thousands of times to slight differences in particle distributions> literally whipping around particles at near the speed of light>the goal is to get 5σ confirmation, as in less than 1 in 3 million chance the slight fluctuation in the particles is just chance> many particles leave the circle like neutrinos> no one ever thought to put a detector in the middle of the damn circle???
>>17003437That's what Fermilab does with their Neutrino Beam. IDK I would expect something interesting to happen in the middle of a circle with particles moving at relativistic speeds. We know that some photons even have special properties when we polarize them circularly and have special antennas for just that purpose.How much would it cost to buy a part of some Swiss guy's farm and put some basic detectors in a shed.
>>17003419The center is where least stuff happens because any meme particles that escape in the middle of the circle escape outwards in basically random directions. Nothing is going to go inwards.
why not just make the accelerator a straight tunnel? How hard can it be to accelerate an electron without having to keep pumping energy inputs lost going in circles, like those NASCAR farmers
>>17003432Some of the best advice I was ever given is if you can't find one shoe, start looking where you found the first one and spread out.
>>17003419I psychically took a look at the LHC. There was a huge force created that kept trying to make a particle real that travelled all the way to the bottom of the continent, South Africa. I could see like a large, oval-shaped onion layer, where the forces kept coming back to make it, but they fell short and pushed it. So there's a high-energy particle out there. I wouldn't be shooting for it; it's far too massive and dangerous.
Precisely because it is an observation of nature, but outside the scientific paradigm. So you can shit on your own tits and be a materialist, but I could say to you "I am also a materialist...and these, my friendo, are materialistic observations".How dumb must scientists be? All I did was take the cock that was given to me.https://www.bitchute.com/video/vwArVeJ5ZMcU
>>17002737Ay tone
So many schizoposts recently
>>17005082It's all like the same 3 people.
Hi, I need help. My AI wrote this article for me, but I cannot understand it:https://drive.google.com/file/d/1JZHbi6cxMC7d0CpzVDMPZHN37tGdKkCz/view?usp=sharing
>>17004636wowThis article proposes that the laws of nature and the state of the universe are not separate things. Traditionally, physics treats laws as external rules and matter as something that simply follows them. In this new framework, called Relative Duality, they are two sides of the same coin: the current state of the universe actually codes for its own next move.The deepest insight is that physical reality does not require an external "instruction manual" or a fixed background like space and time. Instead, the universe is a self-operating system where information can be read either as a description or as a command. Space, time, and particles are not the fundamental building blocks, but are patterns that emerge from how information is consistently exchanged. In short, the universe is a self-encoding system that creates its own rules through its internal relationships.
>>17004325>but with one minimal requirement: no fundamental side of a description may be absolute.>From this follows the first distinction: 0/1. But even this distinction cannot have a fixed preferred side. It must therefore be relatively dual. From that starting pointI see your trying to build the universe from scratch while incorporating ideas from works like the hitch hikers guide to the galaxy where the universe reinvents its self into some thing even more convoluted once it's been worked out.This isn't so much as daul reality theory than a contrived notion of reality.
>>17004303The pull from the start would make a brain from all other universes made in our group. Mathematics shows the other universes are possible so our universes wasn't completely cut off and separate at the start, unlike Hawking's final final theory or Penrose loops.
What are you saying?
>>17004303A thread died for this garbage.
We have a square with a side length of 2000. Inside the square is a circle C with a radius of 525, which can be moved freely within the square as long as it remains within the square. There are also four other circles, which, as shown in the diagram, are tangential to the square and also tangential to the other circles. All radii are integers! The circles must not intersect!Question: What are the solutions for the four circles?
>>170023134/5 C3/5 C2/5 C1/5 C
You have control with:side lenght = 2000 = [ 2*(R1*R3 - R2*R4) + sqrt(2*(R1 - R2)*(R1 - R4)*(R3 - R2)*(R3 - R4)) ]/ [R1 - R2 + R3 - R4]where R2 and R4 are the biggest and the smallest circle of the four circles in the corners of the square.
>>17002538The next check is (for a possible solution):5*R4 = 2*a - (R1+R2+R3+R4)with a = 2000 [side length]and if R4 is the largest radius of the 4 outer circles.
Another interesting problem is what's the remaining area (outside the circles)Of course you could boorishly calculate and add up the areas of all the circles but try to think of something more elegant.
>>17004744Another interesting point is that if the centers of the four outer circles are connected to form a quadrilateral, its area is divisible by the smallest radius of the circles, yielding 6300 (=integer).
Here is what we know: U.S. taxpayer money, funneled through USAID and NIH, funded gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. That research likely caused the COVID pandemic that killed millions and cost trillions.>Dr. Ron Paul In reality, Covid 18 was created by an amateur from South Carolina Historic Prison sample, and North Carolina Bat cave fungal infection, and then released in Denver, Colorado at a movie theater.
Here is what we know: COVID was a HOAX to rape you to death. No mental gymnastics needed.Praise Dr. Ron Paul.
I really wish I would have got the vaccine
I really wish I could suck Doctor Fauci's cock.
>>17005003stfu clanker
Can anyone give me a reason (besides greed and/or bureaucracy) why so many drugs are prescription only? I understand the painkillers can be easily abused, but no one's going to abuse STD meds or heart meds.Same thing with glasses. Reading glasses/Farsightedness Glasses can be found in any drug store, but Nearsightness Glasses are only found at optometrists/online stores.
>>17004804You have sluggish schizophrenia go to gulag now.
>>17004830Nigga lost an argument and now is larping
>>17004839What argument? You didn't make one, you're hallucinating again schizo.
>>17004840The only schizo here is your retarded dumbass
>>17004851>you schizo>you schizo>you schizoThe schizo record player is broken again.
Mathematically God exists. The set of all sentences God would say mathematically exists, the set of all things God would do also theoretically exists. You just have to find it. ;)The only question is, can all knowledge be algorithmically derived? Or are those sets of data forever closed off from us short of obtaining them through supernatural means? Including the knowledge of past, present, and future mathematics? Welcome to occult mathematics.But mathematically, theoretically, a perfect God does exist. Perfection exists, it is a set.
>>17005018Considering the majority of books within the library would be utter gibberish, the majority of the information can be discarded (this solves the storage problem) the choke point is how fast can you produce the information since quantum teach would be able to process the vast amount of data.
Mathematically there is a possible timeline where a higher dimensional organism larps as a deity, despite being actually mortal like us. It would be able to interact with the world in non intuitive, seemingly magical ways, such as reaching inside locked containers, etc. Actual deities don't exist, but this is possible.
>>17005007So? God also exists in my fairytale book, that doesn't make it any more real.
>>17005007>But mathematically, theoretically, a perfect God does exist. Perfection exists, it is a set.Nope, incompleteness proved that no set can be perfect and the closer a set does get to perfect the more perfectly incoherent it becomes in the process.
>>17005017The same people who go to the various branches of government and shit them up with retarded right-wing nonsense like Project 2025.
fr fr no cap wat in the actual hellfire shitfuck was dis nigga even talking about with the 3-6-9?Can it save us from bad shit? is it a psyop? WAT IN TEH ACTUAL FUCK???? serious question hat is in use. remdit spacing for effect.
>>17004949It must be one of those awful spirit diagrams. You need to be in good health and spirit to get electrocuted.
3, 6 and 9 (and 7) don't play nice in base 10, which makes midwits lose their minds for some reason.
>>1700494918 is 11 and 7, which is 3 + 6 + 9>Aaaaand you just lost an IQ point reading this
>>17004949Longitudinal impulses, helped him understand 462418
>69
Can fans cheering/screaming/bashing their fists affect the outcome of a game played across the world via statistical mechanics?
Pissi Cuckittini
>>17003527Cheering obviously has an effect on player psyche which then has an effect on the game. Feeling the crowd is on your side makes you push yourself harder while if the crowd is against you it demoralizes you but that's only generic theory. The actual effect is much more random and individual player dependent and I don't think the effect would be obvious from statistics. What's more fans also react to the game, intense games where the home team wins will get more cheers than where the home team loses which will inevitably drowns out any easy statistical comparisons, if you just plug loudness meters and compare scores you will probably find that the cheering correlates with the game state but it's caused by the game state and the cheering doesn't cause the game state.
>>17003527only if you are at home or in a bar and scream loud enough and throw stuff at the tv, then it works
