>>1034309
i guess it is just really small but my question is why is it so small? even when i use uv squares it is fucking small

>>1034310
hard to say because i dont know how you unwrapped it, but my guess is a few things
>you didnt add seams so the auto-unwrapper did something fucky
>you didnt unwrap THEN mirror your bilaterally symmetrical model, so you everything is half the size it could be if the mirrored UVs were overlapping
>you used a margin that was too big
>you unwrapped the leg as some kind of flat shape instead of a tube for some reason so everything is blobby and fits together badly
>you didnt just rescale shit as you went

File: ezgif-8028c3f151ebe00a.mp4 (3.18 MB, 1460x880)

3.18 MB MP4

>>1034312
>you didnt just rescale shit as you went
am i supposed to unwrap one by one?

>>1034309
>Why is it so small
If you mean the texture, just use a bigger resolution
If you mean the UVs just scale them after unwrapping
As I seen in your picture your unwrapping job is extremely dirty as well, try to unwrap so your UVs don't overlap. You are also using a mirror modifier so keep in mind that your mirror UV represents both sides.

Also this is a question for the question thread id say but whatever.