art craft now has a substance designer and painter clone.:)The best thing is that they're linux binaries and free.
We already have a thread about slopclones
>>1034483Luddites will say this is a bad thing because Shekelberg is now poorer.
I dont get it man why use a broken remake made by and infested with AI when you can just pirate the original
>>1034483>>1034487What’s missing anon, tell the truth because we already have a free painting software.
>>1034490Anything that makes Adobe and people like you seethe is a bonus in my book.
>>1034494>people like youPeople with free painting software?
>>1034495See? You're still seething even those these apps don't hurt anyone.I hope they continue to exist since it pisses you off so much.
>>1034483it'll get abvandoned in a month of of not a couple of weeks sadly.
>>1034499it'd be way easier and quicker to just actually revers substance than rebuild it. the models fuck up no matter the amount of tokens you feed it.
>>1034499"Developers are going to abandon it because... they just will ok!"Meanwhile, corporations give us all the ammo we need to work on it forever.
>>1034494>>1034498We have https://www.materialmaker.org and it lets me create any PBR texture. The dumb slop AI software doesn’t do that. There’s no reason to use slop outdated software vs a human invention that works.
>>1034502Once again, you are seething at people working on a FREE app. You must have severe brain damage if that bothers you.
I can't believe pic related now describes many anons on this site. >Other people have fun with artcraft>"QUIT MAKING FREE APPS!"
>>1034504Quit shilling vibecoded slopware inferior to existing tools
>>1034505No.
>>1034506You're so desperate to get us to want this slop, but why? You know we dont want or like AI right? We wont make it, use it or consume it, but none of us are saying (you) cant use the slopware if you really want to.
>>1034508>but why? You brought it on yourself for acting like a grumpy boomer who yells at clouds.We use to make fun of such boring low lifes. But now you choose to emulate them. Impressive.
>>1034509so you hate us? but then why are you trying so hard to convince us to use your software?its a lot of time and effort you could have spent working on your actual 3d projects...
>>1034512Not everyone is a grumpy boomer who sticks their nose into these threads and can't let go.
>>1034503They didn’t work on it, they didn’t add features that both Adobe and materialmaker offered. There’s no reason to use this slop when other software exists, including paid. This is not a copy of substance because it lacks core principles that we would have brought. We can get the adobe free version on Steam, we don’t need Slop or Adobe when it exists in Steam.Enough with your AI lies.
>>1034487in isolation, this is not a bad thingit being good will depend on how well it actually works, but I'm fine with my pirated copiesand it's still easy enough to filter out the slop, and even take one or two of these projects at face value and try them on and judge them for yourselfat scale, though, slop if going to fuck everything up. you're going to go online and try to get whatever program and be flooded with millions (maybe literally) of clones, many of them with the same name, why the fuck not. meanwhile, no one will develop polished commercial programs anymoreand what for? if I can already easily pirate these programs and the ecosystem was apparently doing fine with the big companies paying for licenses that keep the devs happy while amateurs and students pirate their personal copies, will we actually be better off with al this slop?
>>1034517Has a tech ceo EVER released a product that improved changed life for the better?
>>1034514You're still seething. I want it to exist now because of that. Keep it up. You're only justifying it more.
>>1034517You literally answered your own question here:>the ecosystem was apparently doing fine with the big companies paying for licenses that keep the devs happyReplace "big companies" with dedicated autists who will take over the work and keep fine-tuning a program instead.Again, there is zero reason to cry for Mr. Shekelberg or whine that he's not making his billions anymore. It's not 2022. AI is more than capable of replacing people. In the right hands it's like giving a bodybuilder a jackhammer.
>>1034520>dedicated autists who will take over the work and keep fine-tuning a program instead.heh. doubt itbut it it works, I'll take it. we'll see>it's like giving a bodybuilder a jackhammer.kekyou people are getting more retarded every daywhich is consistent with early studies on the mental decline of AI users
>>1034522>which is consistent with early studies on the mental decline of AI usersThat's funny.So when companies decide to lay off people right now, that signals you are even less employable than retards? Next time put more effort into your "gotchas".
>>1034519>>1034520>>1034523Guy is trolling, banned his ass.
>>1034525>>1034519How about you add the missing features that AI slop is missing instead of being a troll. This thing is open source right? Just ask AI to add PBR creation to allow us node creators to make material of our content. Add ruler effect from Substance so we don’t need another layer, it simply doesn’t paint that area. Put an entire class asset instead of individual photos like in InstaMAT. Give us the option to render in many different rendering methods instead of one. Real time render editing like Substance. A single 3D environment instead of many different windows like bodypaint 3D. Automatically generated bitmaps and png. Image size file optimization instead of manual editing.Well Slop AI anon, tell it to add those features.
>>1034483I have tried it.And it's horseshit.The results are crap.The performance is even worse.The app barely functions.Look, I hate how Adobe became this greedy Jew with its subscription plan, but we can't argue that they created good software and are industry standard fr a reason.
>>1034535> but we can't argue that they created good software and are industry standard fr a reason.Because they had a 36 year head start.The first versions of Photoshop were broken and required patching.The fact that these AI apps already caught up 90% of the way means they will replace Adobe in the next 12 months.
>>1034542Then add the features and bug fixes instead of telling us. It’s open source, tell the AI to do it. Why are you making this difficult, you claim AI is easy. Well anon?
>>1034544>Then add the features and bug fixes instead of telling us. IT IS.We're getting more updates in 1 month than Adobe did. But go ahead and keep moving goalposts.
>>1034545It’s literally missing core photoshop features, the original version from 1990 has more features than AI slop.
>>1034487Adobe is now poor? Proof? The only poors are the vibetards making free shit for nobody.
