Previously, on /asdg/: >>9130557The cartoony side: >>>/aco/csdgDALL-E, Grok, Meta AI or hailuo AI generated stuff belongs on >>>/aco/MMAIFuta belongs on >>>/aco/futasdgReport trolls.>Uncensored Flux modelChroma: https://civitai.com/models/1330309/chroma>Wan video modelshttps://civitai.com/models/1329096/wan-video-21https://civitai.com/models/1817671/wan-video-22Setup Guide: https://rentry.org/wan21kjguideTriton Guide: https://github.com/woct0rdho/triton-windows/blob/readme/README.mdEasy Sage Attention Install: https://github.com/woct0rdho/SageAttention/releases>Guideshttps://github.com/comfyanonymous/ComfyUIhttps://github.com/Haoming02/sd-webui-forge-classic/tree/neoHires Fix: rentry.org/hiresfixjan23Inpainting/Outpainting: rentry.org/drfar | rentry.org/inpainting-guide-SDAnimation: rentry.org/AnimAnonCreate LoRAs, TIs: rentry.org/59xed3 | rentry.org/simplified-embed-training>Forge extensionsADetailer: github.com/Bing-su/adetailerForge Couple: github.com/Haoming02/sd-forge-coupleVectorscope: github.com/Haoming02/sd-webui-vectorscope-ccTag autocomplete: github.com/DominikDoom/a1111-sd-webui-tagcompleteNegPiP: github.com/hako-mikan/sd-webui-negpip4chanX Catbox/NAI prompt userscript: https://rentry.org/hdgcb4chan-x userscript from /h/ that lets you read generation metadata from images in-browser, and upload to catbox with one click when you want to share metadata.>Related>>>/aco/sdg>>>/b/degen>>>/d/ddg>>>/e/edg>>>/g/sdg>>>/gif/vdg>>>/h/hdg>>>/r/realistic+parody>>>/tg/slop>>>/trash/sdg>>>/trash/slop>>>/u/udg>>>/vg/aids>>>/vp/napt>>>/vt/vtai>>>/y/ydg
>>9177537nice one
Has anyone tried ERNIE? How is it? Pic not related
>>9178479I was not impressed. zit and klein both have more general knowledge i think. and nsfw is flux-tier. results may vary depending on prompt used tho.
>>9178490Nudity is far better than Flux. But the provided prompt enhancer is very censored
>>9178479It's really bad and a bit heavy for no reason. Zit and other models remain the best>disssscord 94tNCjXn my disscord. there are already plenty content, and i'm available to help noobs with ai tools. feel free to join if you're really interessed
>>9183262>>9183263model?
>>9183263nano banana 2
>>9177538How in actual fuck, every time I try do 2 panel image it never maintains consistency. Can't ever pull off sex as well, even with MysticXXX shit looks terrible.
Blogpost time, brehsThe AI shit completely mindbroke me. In the past I'd quickly jerk off once or twice a day. It was very rare for me to find any porn that would be something that I am really into. The rare videos I found that were exactly what I want got old and boring.With AI slop now I can generate anything I can think of and it fried my dopamine receptors. Not only have I explored every idea I think is hot but I've put every twist I can think of on it finding new ways to make it hot, spending hours tweaking it until I get it just right to coom. I jerk off 3 times before I get out of the bed. All I think about all day is what I will generate next. When in public I don't feel normal anymore. I feel like I got unplugged from the gooner matrix. I try not to stare at women but just catching a glimpse of a woman floods my brain with ideas, imagining them naked, imagining how I'd fuck them. I feel like a fucking alien and all I can think of is sex. It's a genuine problem.I think I'll have to detox.
>>9183691
>>9183692
>>9183693
>>9183694
>>9183695
>>9183696
>>9183697
>>9183699Read the OP and take your spam to MMAI.
>>9183688>pubic hair in prompt>gets a hairy ass because LLMs think butt=vaginaeverytime
>>9183817model/catbox?
>>9183692>>9183694>>9183695Digosting>>9183696>>9183697Much better
>>9183820z_image_turbo_fp8_e4m3fn.safetensors
>>9183830So the disgosting male shouldn't be included >9183692 >9183694 >9183695>>9183693Sexo
aurora + tats ; this is my first week using img generations
How do I use NSFW Chromaonline? Mp Pc is bad.
>>9184336Using a Runpod or Google notebook? Paying is the only sure thing.
>>9184337I don't mind paying
>>9184325>>9184329>>9184331>>9184333>>9184334>>9180855
>>9184369This general was here first (when it broke away from /h/) and then /csdg/ broke away from us, so in principle we shouldn't mind animated-style porn being posted here, especially when it doesn't depict established characters.
>>9184520"in principle" there's a thread for cartoons now so they should go to their thread. That's why it exists. Admittedly the style is kinda halfway, so /csdg/ won't appreciate it either. It's also melted base res crap without even an adetailer pass, so really it should just go into the trash.
>>9184340how much are you willing to pay?
>>9184336i made many optimised(for weak pc) workflows for many models, especially chroma>disssscord AHBSNgt6T
grim
>>9185921That's Chroma alright. Wish the furfag hadn't lied about including anime in the dataset, you could just do pointy_breasts and get it first try. Natural language often feels like throwing shit at the wall and hoping at least some of it sticks.
>>9185969Having to write a novella for a prompt sounds like a pain in the ass, t b h.
>>9177533>20260413182537-118781836.jpgDoes anyone know why the OP has this filename and why it's a jpg?I keep thinking it might be a repost but I have a hard time believing anyone would be this retarded, so I'm being charitable.Posing model slopmix stuff that look like it was made 2 years ago does make me think he is retarded, though.
>>9187171In fairness to the OP, gooners with negative aesthetic sense spamming each other is still far less consequential than almost-3rd-world/brown AI scammers and spammers being evil on legitimate websites.
how do you get chroma to work in forge? Flux works fine, with the vae, clip_l and t5xxl thing, but when I try to load chroma with this shit I get errors instead.
>>9187171Yes, I genned it myself and it's a jpg because the png is bigger than 4MB.
>>9187204>yes i genned it myselflook nigga, i assume you don't have a pc or you'd be using less ugly models. right?let's just ignore how all your reposts are all lower quality than stuff posted in the last threads, right here, on 4chan.org, the website we are on.and i literally can't tell your stuff apart from the shit that gets spammed on every AI porn site, so I'm taking your word for it.
>>9187207I like using Forge and models that understand Danbooru tags.
>>9187210nta but what models do you use? Chroma is shit apparantly.
>>9187216Sam Base, negative prompting with NegPiP only, Vectorscope to lower the saturation if the CFG starts frying, and 4x-UltraSharp as the upscaler so that the skin texture doesn't get smoothed out.
>>9187220thanks I'll give that a try
i just noticed the /aco/ vam threads disappeared.
>>9187264they should've posted more girls standing around doing nothing.
>>9183671This is what I look like.
>>9187264is vam 2 even still coming out?
Posted this on /b/ but I think this is the right thread, feel free to point me if I'm wrong.
>>9177533>/r/realistic+parodyso it's not a request thread, they don't even do requests apparently, but jannies will still ban minor schizos that the majority schizos dislike?non-existent hostile moderation. the jannie equivalent of Chernobyl.
>>9187877How did that even make it into the OP? Might as well add the Mixed Model General if we're putting in random shit now.
>>9187870it is
>>9188056/r/'s realistic parody general is fundamentally why this thread moves so slowly. Most people who want to generate realistic AI porn are mainly interested in deepfakes of real people, i.e. celebrities.
remember how obsessed NAI was about sanitizing photos from their scraped datasets
>>9188291I don't.Seen a few good looking realism ones here using 4.5, but they were all using vibe transfer.
Hi! I just jumped into AI video generation and stuck into the problem. LTX 2.3 gives really awesome videos in terms of the sound: character movements (chest, head, lips) well synchronized with what it says/how it breath, but i cant generate correct NSFW movements - most of my tries are garbage (i used some NSFW loras that made it better, yet it suck). Wan 2.2 pre-trained for NSFW gives much better NSFW experience with reasonable movements but no sound (MMAUDIO is nothing comparing to what movement-sound synchronization LTX 2.3 native does). So how can i get LTX 2.3 like quiality with good NSFW action (and nudity)
>>9188512That's just how it is. Until someone can finetune LTX on nsfw content, or we get another model.
>>9188515other question - how ppl get hi-res video gens on wan 2.2? Simply increasing the generation res (that takes huge VRAM amount) or there are some really good up-scaling method?
>>9188180We used to post. But people got the B&hammer shoved up their ases, so they left for /b/, then for /r/. Always chased by a certain lolcow.
>>9177533There's no one place for good tutorials.. I just want to gen some nsfw images from photos.I'm using forge with some models i found on civitai. i use img2img and use some prompts. other than that i haven't touched anything other than like denoising. I have no idea what im doing. this is thebest gen i could do, but it doesnt have the girls i want in it.... help
>>9189597You'll need to use inpainting with img2img: mask off the part of the image you want to edit but leave their faces outside the mask. Maybe you'll have to paint a crude shape in the right color in order to generate it correctly, like they do in >>>/e/3076629. If you want to prompt for real people in any pose you want, you have to train LoRAs on their faces, which is probably too involved for you.
Anyone have any knowledge of Loras/models/etc related to non-consensual stuff?
>>9190024What kind of non-consensual stuff were you thinking of? Illustrious-based models should be able to handle a lot of concepts related to rape and BDSM.
>>9191291Did you sage your post?
>>9191328Don't make stuff up
>>9191361this is the most normal poster this place has had probably in months.
It's genuinely upsetting that 2D-trained models are like this.
>>9191427like what?
>>9191914I'd like to generate DOA5 characters, but I know I'll get better results if I used a LoRA.
>>9192827If you're looking for the style too, you might as well use an anime checkpoint, "Dead or Alive" is basically an artist tag. Realism merges (like what appears to be Sambase) do lose some character knowledge in the process of applying their realism visual bias.
>>9191914That's a 2.4 decade old screenshot
>>9188500>Seen a few good looking realism ones here using 4.5What do you mean? All of the realistic NAI images I've ever seen look 3D.
>>9193580Misremembered the look, it's been a while. I meant this guy >>8912345
>>9191817If this is Anima, I wonder how cherry-picked that image is.Cause the base model makes bad hands semi frequently, and loras aren't going to make that issue any better.
>>9193750>the base model makes bad hands semi frequentlyHaven't had that problem more than any other modelHow's the Thread Engagement Specialist job going?
>snarky post about how people post messages in a website made for posting messagesOh, its this caliber of poster huh.I was going to post an image from my lora for advice (lmao), but obviously a waste of time.And you can go back.
>>9193750It's Anima, I trained a pinup girl lora as an experiment. Wouldn't recommend it for realism, always weird textures in the background without depth of field. But it sort of works.>I wonder how cherry-picked that image isOne out of 23. But not because of fingers, I was just testing stuff and then posted the one I liked the most. About one in five has a deformed or missing pinky, other fingers are stable. And you're right that seems to be caused by my lora. Might just be burnt.>the base model makes bad hands semi frequentlyYou mean trying to push the base Anima into realism with just a prompt? Might be, I haven't tried that one much. I'm getting very reliable hands in anime styles, the best we've had so far.>>9193759Linked the thread in /h/ so you might expect some shitposting in the next day or two, sorry about that. Might wake up the thread at least.
>grok make this random chick's tits bigger and, uh... make her 80s winona ryder, thanks
Does anyone have a workflow for something like this? It looks like a z-image with emma lora, but I can't get the same consistency with another nsfw loras
>>9194637I don't. But if you find a lora of her for Chroma you can at least avoid lora stacking. Flux loras also work on Chroma.
>>9194545>>9194700Not saying you should leave, because we're almost dead. But there is a general next door for Grok and the other censor-cucked online models, if you want to give it a try. >>9172516
>>9194731Didn't know there was another general thanks
So I got a 5070ti and figures I could start using Flux models with the extra vram. But they don't really come out better than the stuff I made with pony models. Is this a skill issue?
>>9194802Forget "Flux models" and start with Chroma. But depends on what you imagine under "better". Should look more realistic in terms of both visual style and anatomy, and allow you to prompt for body/facial details an anime model wouldn't understand. Pony didn't even get simple stuff like chinese vs japanese face.
>>9194802You need to adapt to the strengths and weakness of the checkpoint. Mainly getting some NSFW LoRAs and getting your purple prose up to Oscar Wilde tier.And what's up with the Chroma psycho?
>>9194876Why psycho? We can just talk.Chroma is a Flux finetune on a million porn images. So you avoid all the usual downsides of Lora use, and get much broader nsfw knowledge than a single Lora could give you.
Yup, psycho.
Guess trying to help anons truly is the height of madness. Oh well, go get your purple prose, and don't forget the blowjob lora.
Happy MILF day, everybody.
>>9195440
>>9195496Damn tree monkey hybrids, taking our women!
>>9195398i'm sure this is the first thing every sick little mind considered if the green gpu porn/game/ai company ends up implementing it as a marquee 60 series feature.
What is the best model for cartoons with accurate style?
>>9196386I suggest you try asking in the cartoon thread next door, this one is for realism.But afaik you'll need a lora trained on that specific show, which base model you use doesn't matter too much at that point.
>>9195457really nice
>>9196359I'd like more of this (naked hetero couples being together)
>>9198777I bet you do, you filthy degenerate. Consensual sex in the missionary position for the sole purpose of procreation, I've got your number.
>>9179512really good one!!!
>>9177533Just one simple!
>>9182696everything right in this prompt!talent here!!!
>>9197336
>>9199390Kinda neat effect, actually. Do the low frames help with generation times too?
>>9178217>>9178218so you jerk off to characters with bodies that look like a cross between a 13 year old boy and a coat hanger, but then you type "big boobs" and "trannie face with dog jaw" and i'm the one who's meant to jerk off to it?
>>9199902nta but but do we really need quality police in a dying thread? Just hide the pic and move on.
>>9198777
>>9201106nta, good try but teeth need inpainting probablythe face is always critical
>>9201109Eh, I might as well just Photoshop it.
>>9201124better
Anyone have a Milena Velba Lora (preferably pony)?
>>9201434fatty https://civarchive.com has all the deleted stuff
>>9201543thanks!
>>9201662ywpost some results
what’s the reason for two non futa threads? is the other one non-local only?also, is wan 2.2 worth it? I’m on 2.1
>>9202891If you mean /csdg/, the other is for cartoons this one is for photorealistic. The non-local one is MMAI. As you could summarize from the OP information.
>>9202891I didn't know people were still using wan when ltx2 is a thing
>>9203252did she pay in pubes?
>>9203265in this context, yeah samefor anime, LTX is just awful
>>9203517Latent upscaling makes skin texture look like plastic. I get better results with 4x-Ultrasharp:https://huggingface.co/lokCX/4x-Ultrasharp/tree/main
>>9203552That "should" be model-dependent. Latent upscale requires higher denoise to remove upscaling artifacts, and that higher denoise also allows the model to do larger changes ot the image. But a model not based on cartoons/anime could very well push skin texture in the other way using this added freedom.One thing I did manage to confirm in general is that the euler samplers tend to smooth things out, compared to the dpm line.
>>9203265ltx is bad for anime, and still unstable for reality.if you guys are good with ltx, you can share your result on my dis server. any ai content is welcome anywaydisssscord X8ZWsz2bq
>>9203565Why do you keep trying to steal posters from the thread? And then go on to complain about how this place is dead. We can discuss it right here.
>>9203406>>9203265I don’t ever see LTX i2v
>>9203590Not sure if it's censored or just had a cucked dataset, but Wan can at least do basic nudity with nipples without having to resort to lora. LTX just gives me barbie anatomy.Talking about img2vid here, but then I only do silly stuff with anime-like girls on occasion. Someone more invested in vidgen would know more.
>>9203517
>>9191935I want to sniff that pussy! I want to give that scared and depressed girl a good hard FUCK!
I guess the /r/ board got deleted because the URL leads to "File not found."
>>9203901see>>949431360>>9494312584chins got scared of the law
>>9203919oops>>>/b/949431258>>>/b/949431258
I wonder if somewhere, someone from that very place has made a new thread
>>9185226link invalid
is HiDream as bad as it appears? Or do I just have skill issues?
>>9204613No it sucks
I like this prompt, but I can never decide on a body type.
>>9177533>>>/r/realistic+parodywhat happened to this link?
>>9205022The entire /r/ board got nuked.
>>9205022>>9205033Do we know what's going on/qrd?
>>9205435you could try reading a few lines above >>9203921anyway seems like they got scared of lawsuits from AI edits of real people
>>9205439Fair call and I did look at the /b/ bred, mostly just full of /b/tards shitting on each other. The git is just hilighting the >no ai, no morphsthing.Looking at 4stats it went offline on Fri. Says a lot about how slow 4chinz has been lately that there's not even stickies up on other boards...'
anyone know if 1st.AId.bag is posting anywhere now that /r/ is gone?
>>9177537Did you make this one too?
>>9206370No, I didn't.
>>9194637Can we post celebs here?
>>9206803Nothing in the rules against it, but it's likely why /r/ was killed so keep it mind it might not last.
>>9206803They were posted here originally, but people got banned so they migrated, first to /b/, then to /r/.
>>9206828they went back to /b now
>>9206834No, the lolcow promptimus did.
I tried bringing back not-a-celeb to /b/ both threads ended up deleted
>>9207684new laws, bro. it's ded for good
>>9207765We'll we ever find a new home?
Any model good at doing... Realistic pretty degenerate stuff? A combination of Z-image and LORAs kinda worked but not really and I don't know if it's there at all or not yet.
>>9207810Chroma is your best option there, afaik it's still the only large-scale realism NSFW finetune. Works similar to anime-based SDXL ones like PonyRealism, in that it knows loads of actual sex concepts out of the box. But unlike those it can get the photo look right.
>>9207810I've had surprisingly good results with taking a base from Pony/Illustrious or any other model good at degen stuff pose-wise, and passing it to Klein with just "change style to real". If the reso is high enough it won't even bother with censoring most of the time, and even if it does you can add LoRAs to counteract it. Realistically you still need detailing most of the time, though.
This board is for "Adult Cartoons". Threads containing "real" images, or those generated in a realistic style will be removed.
