ITT: cartoons and comics with absolutely no rule 34 what so ever.
Weird. This thread made me want to see those Xyber 9 pics on r34 I saw a few years back, but they've been purged for some reason.Anakonda isn't a loli and none of it was scat or beast related, so I don't get the issue.
>>9206438if its all from the same artist maybe they DMCAed it?
>>9206467I don't remember. There was only a handful, maybe like four pics.
>>9206487post some reference and I'll see what I can do.
This show has nothingThankfully I slopped a shit ton for myselfShes an SEO nightmare because her name is literally "Girl"
The Guardians of the Galaxy cartoon showI want Tangled Gamora lewds dammit
>>9206610What's the show name?
>>9206262It's impressive how almost every DC Comics woman has little rule34:Miracle Mollyblack canary: 2437vixen: 648livewire: 500hawkgirl: 1200shayera: 300zatanna: 4000giganta: 490phantom lady:160talia al ghul: 450
>>9206660Dont forget Perpetua who has none
>>9206262>with absolutely no rule 34 what so ever.See, I would be more hype on this thread if it was also like "very very little" rule 34 or something like that. You already fucked up with that first post >>9206263There's even one in full color, but searching the archives just gives out broken images.>>9206467Remember when you did fanart from that painfully mediocre comic called Jonesey or something like that?
Oh, hey, desuarchive actually had them.What a surprise! I do wonder if these are the only fanart for this thing.
This is my favorite one. I just like the "composition" or whatever. I don't know any art terms.
Last one. I guess this one has the most "rule 34" feel to it. Skin-tight full bodysuit and all.
I'm basically the only anon who request lewds of Supertato (mainly Evil Pea). Mainly on /trash/ drawthreads, discord servers and orb threadsBut of course, there's loads of shows in the open that hasn't got any porn at all. It's about about the search, in my eyes
>>9206739>I'm basically the only anon who request lewds of SupertatoYou're a spammer. Yeah, we know.>Mainly on /trash/ drawthreadsyeah "mainly on /trash", sure lmao
>>9206741>You're a spammer. I wouldn't say spam, but like occasionally requesting
>>9206745Sure thing, spambo.
>>9206747>comparing a single idea or pic to James/hmofa or Fernando who posts multiple times a daySure. Whatever. Way to go off topic
>>9206739>>9206751NTA, but it's really funny how people still don't know who you are. Right speedy? I was an underageb& when I first encountered you, and you're still here doing the same thing. Aren't you in your mid 30s by now? Maybe try being less of an attention-whore and shit won't get "off topic" next time.
>>9206754Whatever. Stick with the topic and don't fling your shit every time I open my mouth. Plus, I'm pretty much past throwing multiple ideas now.What else need more porn?
Hercules Wrath of the Heavens
Luminae
>>9206667based mommy enjoyer.
>>9206732If those were uploaded to Rule 34 (Paheal or xxx?), they were likely removed because they don't qualify as porn.
>>9206751I like how you came back to 4chan and without haste, picked up on the names of people who are worse than you to use their names as ammo when you get shit on.>>9206754He got arrested for loli pornz since he's a britbonger.You can tell he's gets a little uppity when called out.>>9206756>I'm pretty much past throwing multiple ideas now.>pretty muchIt's like he almost wants to fall back into hold habits.In his defense, I will say one request across several drawthreads isn't "spam" in the traditional sense. It's not like its 10 per thread. But given his past, it's hard break loose of his older image.
>>9207305wutNever said they were removed from those places, let alone uploaded. Those were drawn for /co/ and that was it. They are in the old /co/llection booru, and I honestly don't know if they were carried over to the new one.
