>>34576076
you don't, you embrace it and start the fourth reich

1/2

>>34576076
>How do I overcome my inner Hitler
I am trying to do the same as well, after a few months of browsing >>/pol/ I became very radicalized and racist.

Then I started researching everything they said around there, and noticed that many statistics are true, but a lot of them are misinterpreted. For example, a lot of channers post the marriage rate between white women and black men, it shows that black men do not marry white women as much as white women marry Asian men. Then they usually say that this disprove the fact the black men have sex with white women. However, if you pay close attention, this does not reflect reality, how many women have you seen walking around with mixed babies or that had casual sex with blacks? See, the "key" word here is "marriage." This specific word is very important, black men really do not marry white women, it does not mean they do not fuck them.

Now, there are many other statistics that are completely true, like per capita black crime being much higher than white crime, and many other statistics like that. I still do not find a satisfying explanation for this, "Chuds" will usually attribute to racial differences and speciation inside the human race. I would say that I do not have an answer for that. I do know however, that blacks have a lower IQ on avg, and that crime is correlated with low intelligence, and that IQ cannot be changed. So again, points for speciation and racism... But I do think blacks could be socialized, look at black culture when the US was an apartheid state, they spoke much better, and had a decent culture around music, and family tradition. Curiously things went downhill after Jim Crow laws were abolished. But if you check it out, many, not all, but many old black American songs were written by Jews, and blacks interpreted it.

2/2
>>34576125
If you think about it, after apartheid there were many attacks on blacks and their culture, crack and rap were a few of them. I do think these things had the ability to affect their IQ, but if you think more deeply, you will realize that this doesn't explain sub Sahara Africans having low IQ on avg, because they acted as a control group of some sort. One could argue they have low IQ on avg because their society is non-functioning, and lack of nutrition, again, we sent a lot of money to Africans, and instead of solving the problem, their population skyrocketed

If you read till here, I took a long time writing this load of bullshit, so I hope you read. But I am indeed trying to reason here. I notice that whenever I try to raise objections towards how I think, my inner mustachioed argues back. I think that I arrived at the conclusion that we should judge people by the content of their actions. I am trying to gradually change the way I think and learn to appreciate other cultures, I even stopped calling Indians "jeet." It does not mean I do not have the right to have a preference to be around my own people.

I think I sounded like a complete jetoid by saying this. You may not consider anything I said, well, it is still a good read, lol.

>>34576125
>after a few months of browsing >>/pol/
Newfag, i've been there for 10+ years.

>Milo Yiannopolus
>Sargon of Akkad
>Stefan Molyneux
>Richard Spencer
>Not an argument
>Lauren Southern
>Gavin McInnes
>He Will Not Divide Us
>Battle of Berkley
>The Lion
>Never Come Down
>Shadilay
>Wayne Lambright
>Conductor we have a problem
>Really makes you think
>We wuz kings
>"Woke" being called "SJWs"

>>34576076
With your outer Hitler

>>34576125
I think you're are overestimating the quality of Black culture during Jim Crow. The educated urban minority of Blacks spoke better, but they represented the "talented tenth" as DuBois called them. The majority of Blacks were insanely poor, spoke poorly, and lacked any education. This was a direct consequence of Dixiecrat rule and the fact that many Black schools existed only on paper. The main reason you see things like test scores in Black school plummet following desegregation is because, for the first time, the school system is encountering the bottom 90% of Blacks who get to be the first generation going to real school and often with illiterate parents unable to help them. Thomas Sowell writes a fair bit about this. It is also one of the topics explored in 'The Invisible Man' by Ellison

>>34576146
>2026 tourist
>pretending to be oldfag

>>34576125
literally none of this matters at all.
this is what happens when u take troll posting seriously, & why the board went to shit c2015.
u ever read a fucking book?
who cares if u call indians jeets online but have indian friends? one is trolling one is sincere. i know, ur incapable of distinguishing the two.
maybe this site isn’t for u if u let a couple hundred posters on the reddit clone zombie board convince u to be racist in the span of a few months when u weren’t before.
>>>/bant/

File: W. E. B. Du Bois.jpg (13 KB, 250x333)

13 KB JPG

>>34576954
>'The Invisible Man' by Ellison
I saw the old movie, but I haven't read the book. Do you think it's worth reading?

>I think you're are overestimating the quality of Black culture during Jim Crow
>DuBois
I did not know this man, was he half black? Do you think his works are worth reading?

>>34577162
>who cares if u call indians jeets online but have indian friends?
>maybe this site isn’t for u if u let a couple hundred posters on the reddit clone zombie board convince u to be racist in the span of a few months when u weren’t before
You completely confuse discrimination with racism.

>this is what happens when u take troll posting seriousl
I do not think OP is trolling, but even if he is, I know many people here have gone through what he described, just as I am going through it right now.

>u ever read a fucking book?
You didn't, as you can't even form a coherent sentence.

>>34576146
Wow that list sound like some form of timetraveling back to 2016-2018 circa /pol/

>>34576146
>tourist

(1/2)
>>34576130
>sub Sahara Africans having low IQ on avg
If you want an explanation for why this is the case, the most likely reason is simply because they are impoverished. If you look at the world, regardless of the region, you will see an increase in iq as that region develops. People have access to cleaner water, women eat higher quantities of higher quality food creating healthier babies, and treatments for diseases or parasites that could cause fatigue or stunt growth are introduced. Unfortunately Africa's governments are extremely corrupt, the money they receive is embezzled and the few services they provide are ineffective. In that situation it's hard to concern yourself with reading or education, you're focused on your immediate needs first.

(2/2)
>>34577676
And there just isn't enough resources to support the scientists, engineers, physicians, mathematicians that already exist in Africa. They see that other countries provide grants, have more consistent wages, more positions, they live safer. They see that skilled workers in those countries don't have to put up with cronyism and general corruption like they do.

If you talk to doctors, engineers, teachers who emigrated from Africa, you will see that they have patriotism for their country, but they are frustrated by the lack of opportunities. So they leave. And the collective iq of these countries drops.

>>34577676
>>34577682
Africa has the most resources of anywhere in the world and the most land, so throw that cope out. Also their have been plenty of experiments with rich and poor people, black and white, black babies adopted by rich white families,and white babies adopted by black families. The IQ gap is always there. Scientists have identified hundreds of genes correlated with increased intelligence, and blacks almost always are severely lacking in the % of population expressing these genes compared to non-black races. Stop with the cope.

>>34577676
The most likely reason that contains the fewest assumptions is simply that IQ is tied to genetics in humans the same way it is, and has been demonstrably proven so, for every other creature on earth.

>>34577720
>Africa has the most resources of anywhere in the world and the most land
And their leaders let alone people haven’t exactly had full ownership and stewardship of them for centuries now have they?
Weird that you have to lie and manufacture data to support your deranged prejudice, lot of effort going into a supposedly secure belief

>>34577879
>And their leaders let alone people haven’t exactly had full ownership and stewardship of them for centuries now have they?
NTA but, they did have thousands of years for it though.

>>34577676
>If you want an explanation for why this is the case, the most likely reason is simply because they are impoverished
Then why black Americans also have an avg IQ of 80 points? They live under the same country and same laws whites do.

>>34577720
Africa does have a lot of resources, but the majority of the population doesn't see the wealth from those resources. I don't think you understand how bad corruption is in those countries.

>>34577886
Resources by themselves aren't valuable. White countries had petroleum and uranium since the bronze age, why didn't they develop them? Why was aluminum used as a fancy metal for centuries instead of an all purpose lightweight metal? Because internal combustion, nuclear reactors, and electrolysis changed everything. It's only being within a world of functioning markets and scientific institutions that makes resources worth anything

Were Europeans retarded when Western Rome fell and they pillaged the aqueducts for stone? No, of course not, when you no longer have an empire wide engineering institutional memory, there's no value in having a non working ancient aqueduct around versus using that to build houses.

At every stage of historical development resource use value is totally contingent, and it's flagrantly retarded to say those things in Africa have the value they would if they were in the developed West

>>34576076
You need to cultivate your inner Stalin.

So, you can get rid of the evil stuff and keep the good stuff about Hitler.

Bad:
>Trauma from ww1
>Bitterness from living in extreme poverty
>Greed and overambition

Misunderstood:
>Race unity: Hitler is talking about uniting German states, not measuring nose sizes.
>Betrayels: Hitler is spied on frequently and has to take extreme measures.
>Weaknesses: Hitler did have moments of ego and psychosis such as the battle of Budapest, despite being a good person.

Good:
>Hitler does not believe in balkanized meme states
>Hitler believed in national duty from state to citizen and vice versa
>Hitler was willing to take extreme risks to do what he thought was the right thing

Translation into American politics:
>No need to negotiate with corrupt special interest groups; declare them as public enemy.
>Consider nationalization of assets; be realistic about economic approach
>Get rid of fake or trauma based policies, based from bitterness or hatred.