[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/adv/ - Advice

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.
  • AdBlock users: The default ruleset blocks images on /adv/. You must disable AdBlock to browse /adv/ properly.
  • Are you in crisis? Call the National Suicide Prevention Lifeline at +1 (800) 273-8255.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


Janitor applications are now open. Apply here!


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: facer.jpg (154 KB, 867x573)
154 KB JPG
Where do you find kinky women? I’ve tried Feeld, fetlife, Reddit, /soc/, discord for the last 5 months and have had no luck. I only have one kink I want to explore and I live in a major city and even then it’s been crickets.
>>
>>34596734
It's always the 5-6s who seem dignified and sweet that are the kinkiest
>>
fuck kinky... where do you find women into lolicon and ageplay and long term commitment?
>>
>>34596780
isint this also kinky?
>>
>>34596734
If your kink is rare enough, it's going to be a problem anywhere. What is it?

Did you try Googling for BDSM munches in your area? Or looking for fetish fairs?
>>
>>34596785
okay fine what eva mendez
I just want a woman that wants to be my wife
that wants a loving committed relationship
and is a pervert that looks at lolicon
is that too much to ask of this world?
like... my god man please please pretty fucking please
>>
>>34596767
I dated a few mids and they were as vanilla as they looked
>>
>>34596807
what do you mean exactly by "looks at lolicon". Isin't this CP?
>>
>>34596819
no these are cartoons
>>
>>34596838
Being a cartoon and being CP are not mutually exclusive.
>>
>>34596838
Lolicon is legally classed as child porn in many countries.
>>
>>34596844
it's ink on a piece of paper you need to get your mind out of the gutter buddy
>>
>>34596806
It’s just a watersports kink. Pretty mild in the grand scheme of kinks but many women will not go near it. I’m not really into BDSM or anything else so I’m stuck in between not fitting in with vanilla women or extreme kink women
>>
>>34596847
Doesn't matter. A thought is not a crime. And that argument does not hold up in court.
>>
>>34596876
it's disgusting, you think like a pedo!!! If it were legal you would look at real CP. EWWWW
>>
>>34596887
It's interesting you say that, because I actually wouldn't. I have no interest in that at all. I prefer real women.
>>
Thread once again derailed by the pedo
>>
>>34597097
>wanting a relationship with a grown woman who likes wearing diapers and pigtails equals pedo
lmao whatever dude as if
>>
>>34597142
this doesn't sound any better
>>
>>34596734
You need prostitutes. Women won't give themselves for free when they have hundreds of guys wanting them.
>>
>>34597309
The idea is that these women I find will have similar kinks to me so it would be a mutual enjoyment. From what I’ve seen online women love being with guys who like getting them off in the ways they love and without judgement or stigma
>>
>>34596852
>its only a drawing of a 6 year old being raped
>you gotta get your mind out of the gutter buddy
The "buddy" make you sound even more like a psycho pedo, get help
>>
>>34597383
>omg this completely fictional drawing is hurting me
I think you're the one that needs help here
>>
>>34596876
It isn't a decision for the courts; lolicon is legally classed as child porn by *statute* in many countries. The courts have no choice but to respect a law passed by the country's parliament.
>>
>>34597450
Oh wow, well then I guess 4chan is in some deep shit for hosting the thousands upon thousands of lolicon threads on /b/ we see everyday. Judges don't give a shit about lolicon. The only time you go to jail over that is if you had actual real life child porn to go along with it. They've got better shit to worry about than waste their time on this.
>>
>>34597580
4chan is hosted in the United States, which is one of the countries where lolicon is still legal. If it were hosted in the UK then yes, the organisation would be prosecuted. I realise that Americans struggle to understand the concept that there are any countries outside the US, let alone that they might have different legal systems, but please try.
>>
>>34597406
It's not the fact that it *is* a drawing that is concerning, it's the subject matter portrayed by those drawings. Fact of the matter is that you beat your shit to children being sexually exploited; the fact that it's not "real" mitigates damage but doesn't change the fact that what is being depicted is repulsive and reprehensible.

If you were to describe the scenarios in your porn but leave out the fact that it was drawn/animated, you would be put in prison.
>>
>>34596811
perhaps you didn't push hard enough
>>
>>34597792
lol it's generally agreed upon worldwide that it is absolutely retarded to throw someone in prison for having a thought. here in the states it's even unconstitutional, that's why it's a legal grey area, for all countries involved, not just the states. well, that is of course, unless you live in shitholes like iran, where women aren't allowed to show their skin.

lol you open that door up, you might as well be put in prison for playing shooting games like call of duty, cause you're killing innocent (fake) people.

>>34597815
>If you were to describe the scenarios in your video game about killing people but leave out the fact that it was a video game about killing people, you would be put in prison.
ah, but it's still a video game at the end of the day, isn't it.

>the fact that it's not "real" mitigates damage but doesn't change the fact that what is being depicted is repulsive and reprehensible.
there is no damage to mitigate. the persons in question simply do not exist. you're grossed out, we get it. but being grossed out by a thought is unfortunately not enough to put someone in prison over. sorry, kiddo.
>>
>>34596734
Tack shops
>>
>>34597815
3rd worlder thought process. Stay in Europe and think how you'll repel Russia from steamrolling you (again) instead of persecuting people for thought crimes. It's actually insane how backwards the so called "liberal democracies" of Europe are just the same sexually repressed fascists of the past.
>>
>>34597905

>it's generally agreed upon worldwide that it is absolutely retarded to throw someone in prison for having a thought.

It's also generally agreed upon worldwide that people who want to fuck kids should be dealt with swiftly and violently. The common man isn't your friend here.

Actively and repeatedly going out of your way to consume media that clearly depicts children in a sexual way isn't a thought, it's a behavioral pattern. Behavioral patterns are actionable, and taken into account in the event a crime is committed typically in regards to sentencing; very much like violent games/ideation can be an aggravating factor in violent crimes. Another difference between playing violent games and reading lolicon is that sometimes violence can be instrumental to achieving something good along the lines of revolution, justice, or at least morally grey like vengeance; where as lolicon is just fucking children, which is always objectively evil.

Even if it's harm reduction for you so that you don't go out snatching preschoolers in your candy van I still firmly believe you should be in therapy to address this before it evolves from thoughts into actions.

>sorry, kiddo.
You wish freak

>>34597966
>Europe are just the same sexually repressed fascists of the past.

So Europeans are sexually repressed for not wanting to fuck children?
>>
>>34598084
>Actively and repeatedly going out of your way to watch horror movies that clearly depict people being murdered in a gruesome way isn't a thought, it's a behavioral pattern. Behavioral patterns are actionable, and taken into account in the event you actually go out and murder someone.
How many times we gonna do this? Who the fuck watches American Psycho and thinks, hmmm, you know what... I'm gonna go murder some people.

>you should be in therapy to address this before it evolves from thoughts into actions
Yeah, that's nice, except I don't give a shit about kids. I'm attracted to women.
>>
>>34597815
>If you were to describe the scenario, but leave out the fact that it's fake...
Really makes me think
>>
>>34597905
>where women aren't allowed to show their skin
Incorrect.
>>
>>34598084
>something good along the lines of revolution
"Enlightenment" brainrot
>>
>>34598084

Based post. Pedos ITT are coping and will eventually be dealt with
>>
>>34602307
>coping with the fact that you cannot criminalize a thought
only in your dreams
>>
>>34602805
>>coping with the fact that you cannot criminalize a thought

Again, actively and repeatedly going out of your way to consume media that clearly depicts children in a sexual way isn't a thought, it's a behavioral pattern. Behavioral patterns are actionable, and taken into account in the event a crime is committed typically in regards to sentencing.

Imagine coping with being a pedo by explaining to people why it's ok to be a pedo; can't say I pitty you though chomos get the rope.
>>
>>34596734
You know you can just pay a woman for her time in exchange for trying out your kink.
>>
>>34603157
It might come to that but right now the idea that a woman would be doing it just for my benefit doesn’t make me feel good. Knowing that’s she’s only being kinky because I tell her to kills my sex drive
>>
>>34598158
>>34603133
>Actively and repeatedly going out of your way to watch horror movies that clearly depict people being murdered in a gruesome way isn't a thought, it's a behavioral pattern. Behavioral patterns are actionable, and taken into account in the event you actually go out and murder someone
you've already lost this argument let it go
>>
>>34596734
i would marry this woman
>>
>>34603346
Nah that post is just mirroring my statement onto murder, where it is also correct and you are still a pedophile.

>you've already lost this argument let it go
>>
>>34603610
>that post is just mirroring my statement onto murder, where it is also correct
the fuck does that even mean? god you're a retard



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.