feedback from both sexes welcome. I want to last longer but I wonder if the risk of finishing early vs optimizing PIV is worth considering.
>>34610807Most marketing claims about condoms can safely be ignored. Skyn brand have a slight advantage over others, in that if someone has a latex allergy, they won't trigger it. Other than that, there's not much to choose between brands. It is well worth getting something that actually fits you properly; but beyond that, don't worry about it.
>>34611019ah there is truth in the sensitivity and the benzocaine numbing (I think its too risky honestly, that is has a risk of her getting numbed too).>not much to choose between brandshm i see, not much variation in experience I presume?>actually fits you properlylmao trve.>latex allergy contingencySHIT you have a point, I think I should have a non-latex backup, actual good point. I got a condom pouch as crazy as that fucking sounds; but its still meant to be kept in the front pocket. I know it sounds autistic to have one but the wallet degrades it, just keeping it in your pocket can possible degrade it. A pouch actually made sense in that case and I dont want people to see a fucking condom wrapper if it drops so the pouch is conspicuous enough so that people wont think much.
>>34611019added to my condom arsenal
>>34611019>>34611043WAIT ACTUALLY I CHANGED MY MIND IM GETTING THIS ONE
>>34611032>I think I should have a non-latex backup,To be clear: Skyn condoms are actually latex, but they're made from synthetic rather than natural latex, which means the impurities that are what actually trigger a latex allergy aren't present and they're safe for people with latex allergies to use. The reason I mention this is that there are a few situations where you do actually need a non-latex condom, for example if you're experimenting with whipped cream: for that, you'll need polyurethane condoms. But they're less comfortable than latex.
>>34611067>experimenting with whipped creamalright lolthank you fren, it's an interesting point you made; they say it's made with polyisoprene: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polyisoprene. so make of that what you will.
>>34611076Well, yeah, it's synthesised cis-1,4-polyisoprene, as opposed to cis-1,4-polyisoprene extracted from rubber tree sap.
>>34611117so you're referring to impurities that aren't there from synthesized cis-1,4-polyisoprene. it's not just the polyisoprene itself? if I understand correctly. damn my nigga you're a chem nerd
>>34611117obv drugs are bad (depends honestly but meth is definitely bad), do you happen to know the truth behind D-Meth vs racemic meth? I've read from chem forums that regardless of how its synthesized (p2p or not) it didnt make a difference ever.
>>34611019>>34611043>>34611046Buy an ad, Skyn.
>>34611187lol i wasnt kidding
