no? i mean thats literally what its for

>>34634252
I had a Dutch acquaintance tell me it's rude and he went in a complete rage when I told him this exact response, lol.

well that depends, are any of you gonna clean it up afterwards?

>>34634158
Only if he's sitting there already

>>34634158
No, but it is polite to ask first.

>>34634158
Typically no, it's more rude to not let somebody use your toilet.

I keep a can of fragrance of some kind in the bathroom, it's rude if they don't cover the smell of their shit, and its rude if they paint the bowl and don't scrape it after or forget to flush.

>>34634158
no but some people are INSANE about toilets and shitting, i had a friend who's mum would only let anyone shit in this one toilet in a small room under the stairs, but it was under the stairs so the ceiling was slanted and you couldn't stand up properly in there.
she made their whole family do this despite having multiple luxurious bathrooms.

>>34638906
>i had a friend who's mum would only let anyone shit in this one toilet in a small room under the stairs
>she made their whole family do this despite having multiple luxurious bathrooms.

I think you can strike the "about toilets" and just let her be insane, period. Must have been a real dragon, what kind of cuck famil would allow a single woman to dictate toilet usage lmao. Having a main pay for luxurious bathrooms only to claim them for exclusive shitting by yourself is one hell of a cucking.