TONE CHECK: based on this text message how does this person feel about me
>>34851987He isnt telling anything about you. At least for me outside of the situation. Do you think it means something more? Do you did something with the samba dancers?
>>34851987He had a good time and he’s not lying or exaggerating. You are invited to say something like>fuck yeah dude we definitely gotta do that againTalking about the girls is also a conversation path he opened up for you. Telling him your favorite one or favorite memory of one from the night would go over well; he almost certainly has his version of that in the hopper ready to go if you take that path.Anyway I truly can’t say how he FEELS about you now but he had a good time and clearly wants to be texting you about how good of a time he had. No worries on your part.
she thinks you're a potential orbiter
>>34851987>samba performersAre you guys Brazilians? I got curious about that
>>34852020There’s no way that women start texts with>yooooooooRight?
Post more about the person and yourself first. Age, sex, etc
>>34851987they didn't mention you at all, so yes... you're autistic.>"wow that sunset sure is beautiful.">Guys, does my friend hate me secretly????That's what you sound like, 100% autistic.
>>34852020she would unfortunately be correct. for context this was after she sent me an audio message being like "oh i forgot to mention you were in my dream last night i forget what happened but yeah ahaha" to which I laugh reacted and responded that she should keep a dream journal in order to remember her dreams better
>>34851987We have literally no context for this, we don't even know if that's a man or a woman, but the fact that they seem to be initiating conversation is a good sign. They're telling you they had a good time. If you were there, then they're telling you they had fun with you. (If you weren't there, then they're implying you should have been there.)
>>34852440I'm just curious how it reads from a completely objective third party
>>34852448It was less objective when you omitted the gender. When I thought it was a male, it was this >>34852019Now that I know they’re female it changes fucking entirely. Objectivity does not involve concealing relevant data.
>>34852501ok sorry anon. What is your take on it now?
>>34852524I won't make any big assumptions, but she seems to at least consider you a friend (or potential friend if you haven't known eachother for long).btw op, since you're autistic you should ignore this kind of advice>>34852020Men like this are just autists who were hurt/lonely during highschool and never recovered from it. It's easy to interpret a woman being your friend as sadistic manipulation when you can't intuitively read social cues. Guys like this cope by dragging other men (especially younger men) into their self-inflicted despair. Just ignore them.
>>34851987They wanna keep talking to you
