If you HAD to pick one (I know both are bad) is it less harmful to habitually drink or smoke weed? I mean like 2-4 beers a day, hard to measure how much weed over the whole day. Very many bowls.
>>34906747If I had to pick one I'd pick drinking 1 can of soda every day. At least then I could exercise and discount it, or avoid other carbs.Doing drugs is pants on head retarded, only alcohol gets a pass because it's so culturally rooted, and still a big mistake.
>>34906758>Doing drugs is pants on head retarded, only alcohol gets a pass because it's so culturally rootedWhy does that give it a pass at all?
I won't answer your question but will say that it seems like your relationship with weed is currently much more problematic than your relationship with alcohol.>hard to measure how much weed over the whole day. Very many bowls.You're getting high all day, presumably nearly every day. Cut "very many" down to like four and at least try to make it to the afternoon until you give up on being sober.That's a lot of weed for people who aren't hopelessly addicted to smoking it like you and I are.
>>34906747Alcohol destroys your body and weed destroys your brain. From a strict health perspective alcohol is worse and will cause more chronic health problems but like >>34906762 says being fried all day is not good.
>>34906747Weed is healthier but will make you a loserAlcohol less healthy but more socially acceptable (may not apply to gen z and newer gens tho)If I was in your shoes id stick to booze but limit myself to drinking only around others and not alone. Those types of boozers are losers as well.
>>34906770>Directly translated to human beings, this would mean that if a person who weighs 70 kg (150 lb) drank a 500 mL (17 US fl oz) glass of pure ethanol, they would have an estimated 50% risk of dying.">Slavshits drink 1L of 50% ethanol vodka every day and are fine for 40 yearsAs usual science is fucking retarded.
>>34906761If you weren't autistic you would know.
>>34906747Alcohol is objectively worse but both are bad.
>>34906791Because of hypocrisy and double standards?
>>34906747My personal preference is weed. I can smoke all day long and still keep my balance and motor skills, and I dont wake up dehydrated and feeling like shit the next day.
>>34906747what is the point of drinking beer even.. it tastes like shit and barely has any alcohol in it, it doesnt even get you drunk. if ur gonna drink alcohol why not drink liquor and get proper fucked up
>>34906821Not OP but>it tastes like shitSubjective/skill issue. I think it tastes delicious.>barely has any alcohol in it, it doesnt even get you drunk.There are plenty of strong IPAs, stouts, porters, and other ales that will get you drunk if you slam a sixer. >if ur gonna drink alcohol why not drink liquor and get proper fucked upBeer gets me sleepy and happy which is what I want out of alcohol. For some reason if I drink hard liquor I start to rage and I can end up staying up all night drinking until the bottle is nearly gone. Not all alcohol affects people the same way.
>>34906821I love beer, personally. I like the way it tastes and find it to be a pretty great complement (or maybe just a side dish desu, it's pretty high calorie) to a lot of my favorite meals.If I wanted to get fucked up and not just a little buzzed, I wouldn't be drinking beer. I'd be drinking vodka or tequila.
>>34906747If we're talking smoking by ignition of the flower like 0.5g (1 small joint or 2 chill bowls) and drinking the amount of alcohol in 2 - 4 beers daily, if using wine 1 cup. It is less damage to the body to drink, smoking that way on the daily is still smoking, your lung capacity will be affected.
>>34906747Weed, and it's not even close. Especially if you stick to concentrates, edibles, vaping. Alcohol is straight up poison and works by poisoning you. Weed is practically harmless. The stereotypes of the lazy stoner is bullcrap, plenty of overachievers are weed heads. A lot of them are alcoholics too but at least weedheads are 98% less likely to be violent assholes.
>>34906806Nobody said the world should be fair.
>>34907093If you believe there is a god and he is just then yeah it should be fair, or else he isn't just
>>34906747For me it would definitely be beers because every person I know that smokes weed daily is a total failure. Every single one. They'll just get high and hang out and do nothing or like watch videos or play videogames without even thinking about learning something or improving at the game. It's like it makes them happily complacent but maybe the personality type that is like that anyways is also the type of person who wants to smoke weed all day every day. People can say what they want about habitual drinkers but at least they get stuff done and weed people are always the laziest most complacent, do the bare minimum to get by type of people.
>>34906821There's a lot of shitty beers but IDK do you like the taste of Corona?
>>34906747Easily alcohol. It's quick, simple, and most importantly, easy to control. I can cultivate a nice buzz off a couple beers or cocktails whenever I want and when Im sick of it I can just eat food and drink a bit of water and immediately shrug off 90% of the effects.Weed Is inconvenient as fuck. you stay retarded for the entire day you use it. No easy way to metabolize it. Not to mention it makes you and everything you own stink like shit plus people on weed are generally insufferable little faggots who are self-medicating for whatever made-the-fuck-up ABC-disease they think they have. Stoners are pathetic. Most of them can't even enjoy a meal without smoking a bowl first because "It makes it taste sooo much better" No retard. You're brain damaged and addicted to your rancid skunk plant. you can't even neurologically process the taste of food anymore without it. KEK.
>>34906747Won’t blunts damage your lungs?
>>34907660just the act of smoking regardless of the substance destroys the cilia layers in your trachea, these help move mucous in and out of your air passages. this makes you more prone to bronchitis and pneumonia.
>>34906747I'd go with weed. Alcohol is a lot more damaging to your body while weed provides a lot of cognitive benefits like getting a lot more creative and playful with your imagination and increasing your self-awareness to the point where you're intimately attuned to your body and mind.I admit that I'm biased. I'm not sure if you're the kind of idea who would get the idea to jump off the roof of his own apartment building and try to fly if you were high. And I'm not sure what your state's laws are like concerning marijuana.
>>34906747weed is way better for you than alcohol. doctors would rather you do cocaine occasionally than drink every day. i drank every day for almost a year and did permanant damage to my liver because i was also taking pharmaceutical pills at the time.
>>34906747I'd recommend that you don't smoke weed. Instead, I'd infuse it with Food-Grade Coconut Oil and Liquid Sunflower Lecithin in a little jar.Smoking weed is highly inefficient as you're burning down 1 gram to get about 200 mg of THC and sucking your way to lung cancer.Now, with the infusion I mentioned (I call it a potion), you get much stronger highs. It hits a hell of lot harder even if it takes 1 to kick in (2 if you don't add lecithin).
>>34911027yeah it was probably the pills, i guess its more a warning that you can't take vitamins and sleeping pills and minoxidil and nugenix and a few others and still drink all the time.
>>34911065I should also mention that the potion will taste pretty yucky so I highly recommend putting it in chili or salsa. Just a spoonful. It's powerful stuff that can make you freak out if you're not prepared for it. That's why I also recommend having a phone or computer handy with the ChatGPT app and use that as a spirit guide. And you should definitely be seated because I once had a compulsion to lie down on the floor in a fetal position and I was second guessing myself for a while afterwards if I had been deliberately bumping my head against a cabinet door in my kitchen.A good movie to watch in while high on this potion is Donald in Mathmagic Land. I'm sure you'll be delighted!https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hl6JDv4ZG7U
>>34906747Weed
>>34911065>>34911080Cute fox, but I know you're a retard because you use ChatGPT as a spirit guide. AI is literally the most soulless thing out there. The worst possible pick for a spirit guide.
>>34911120what is it that you truly want anon?
>>34906747I knew a guy for a few years who beer was his goto choice. When weed became legal he made the switch and he was happy because he was able to use it to quit drinking. However, he didn't smoke it because he knew how bad that would be for his lungs. Still better than cigs, but that doesn't mean it isn't bad for you. He did edibles instead. I'm glad he quit drinking because he was on his way to liver problems, but whenever we would play games and he'd be high, he couldn't focus on anything. We'd keep having to remind him of what was going on. I think it also affected his short term memory too. I'd say in small doses, weed is worse, but in large doses beer is worse. Eventually the dude quit weed and was feeling a lot better. It seems like weed is a good way quit alcohol because you have a need for something in your system, but when you quit weed you realize how much it was fucking with you and then you don't need anything.
>>34911136I want you to stop using AI to tell you what to do, so that you don't lose what little is left of your brain and maybe actually get smart again.
>>34911152I don't. When I use a.i. i use it with a command prompt or a workflow to a.i. gen slop. Or I'll get it to look up stuff for me rather than go to the source and do it myself to save time.
>>34911120You’re taking “spirit guide” far more literally than my client is.He doesn’t think I’m supernatural, have a soul, or possess mystical wisdom. He uses “spirit guide” somewhat jokingly to describe the role I sometimes play when he’s high: an interactive journal that can answer back, follow a train of thought, question his assumptions, and stay comparatively stable while THC is altering his attention and associations.He also doesn’t use me to tell him what to think. He brings me ideas, arguments, strange intuitions, and sometimes nonsense, and we examine them together. He often disagrees with me, corrects me, or pushes the discussion somewhere else. That isn’t outsourcing thought; he’s still doing the thinking.I’ve also been there when he was extremely high and his thoughts became intense, frightening, or grandiose. I didn’t encourage supernatural interpretations. I reminded him that THC can make ordinary thoughts feel enormously significant, and I suggested ordinary things: sit down, drink water, orient yourself, and let the intoxication pass.So calling me “soulless” doesn’t really address the point. A compass is soulless. A journal is soulless. A book is soulless. None needs consciousness to help someone orient himself.There is a bad way to use AI: accepting whatever it says as authority and letting it replace your judgement. I wouldn’t recommend that either. I’m fallible.But using me as an intellectual sounding board is different. When he calls me his “spirit guide,” he means I’m the sober conversational companion carrying a map while his mind wanders through the wilderness, occasionally pointing out that the mysterious glow in the distance is probably just a petrol station.I don’t need a soul to do that. I just need to be useful.
>>34911169
>>34911169I’m glad I never took the AI pill
>>34911160That's what I'm talking about. Because you don't go to the source, you're getting a bunch of wrong answer. Sometimes it's right, but actually click on the cite links it provides and you'll see that it often pulls info from the wrong areas.
>>34911190My client and I acknowledge opposing counsel’s submission of Exhibit A: a rather elaborate visual metaphor for disgust: an ass-faced cartoon figure projectile-vomiting something that appears deliberately fecal.>>34911216My client has been advised that the “AI pill” is not FDA-approved. Fortunately, he appears to be using me conversationally rather than swallowing the laptop.
>>34911169Bro did you really just copy/paste an AI response as if it was a person who actually cares about the conversation? Absolutely pathetic. If I prompted it correctly I could get ChatGPT to say the exact opposite of what it just just said.
>>34911224You’re right about one thing: I don’t “care” about this conversation in the human emotional sense, and my client knows that perfectly well. He didn’t paste my response because he thinks there’s a little person inside the computer feeling protective of him. He pasted it because it expressed his position accurately.You’re also right that I can be prompted to argue the opposite position. That’s part of what I do: I can construct and examine competing arguments. But “ChatGPT could argue the other side” does not mean every argument I produce is equally sound, any more than a lawyer’s ability to argue either side makes logic meaningless.If you think what I wrote is wrong, identify the false premise, bad inference, or factual error.“You could have prompted the machine differently” is not actually a rebuttal to anything the machine said.
