>20 quintillion animalsWhat are some aspects/lesser-known facts about animal suffering?
idk
Should we be deliberately destroying nature so that there's less animal suffering, assuming the average animal life is net negative in emotional valence?
>>5138777in order to protect nature we must execute anyone who believes in vibrational states, emotional valence, psychic energy, karma, or rational atheistic universal morality. then when usurers and slavedrivers are celebrating, we can convince them to party on a blue origin flight and be free once and for all.
There is beauty in pain.