[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/an/ - Animals & Nature

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


Janitor acceptance emails will be sent out over the coming weeks. Make sure to check your spam folder!


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: W2148_large.jpg (60 KB, 320x480)
60 KB JPG
Are there any species in the animal kingdom, besides humans, where the maternal have the cognitive wherewithal to sacrifice themselves if it meant that their offspring would have a chance at survival.

I'm not talking about matriphagy, but an actual impulsive event like throwing themselves in front of an unstoppable force. Is this unique to only people?
>>
File: 1774188134406735.webm (2.88 MB, 400x400)
2.88 MB
2.88 MB WEBM
>>5142171
>>
Maybe, because it doesn't make much sense to be programmed in as a survival response. If a mother animal dies the children are probably fucked anyway. Meanwhile if the mother lives she could probably just try again later. Humans can only really get away with a lot of the stupid self-destructive shit we do because of our society.
>>
>>5142174
For a mother, is the innate knowledge of knowing that in any event where they must perish their offspring have a higher chance of surviving because another person can take care of their child? As a tribal species, this makes more sense for why we might have looser self-preservative principals.
>>
>>5142171
Octopus mothers starve themselves to keep their eggs safe
>>
>>5142173
This seems kind of stupid from an evolutionary perspective. Eggs are cheap and you can always make more if you survive, and trying to protect them is not in any way guaranteed to succeed. Seems like it would be more logical to just abandon them, at least if you're up against a giant machine like that.
>>
>>5142225
It's just a dumb bird it doesn't know what is farming machinery
>>
>>5142171
Grouse do this, look up "broken-wing display"

So do deer, and many other animals

Whether it's a matter of instinct or "cognitive wherewithal" is more debatable
>>
>>5142171
It might happen on rare occasions, but like >>5142174 said, it's more beneficial for the species to prioritize keeping the adults alive since they can fend for themselves better and produce more children later. Some mother animals will even sacrifice their children to survive.

For example, female macropods (kangaroos, wallabies, quokkas, etc.) will fling their joeys to distract predators and escape. Contrary to popular belief, this is not a voluntary decision on their part; their pouch reflex forces them to eject their joeys when they're frightened.
>>
>>5142278
True but it should have some basic instincts that tell it what fights it can win. If it's like a rat or something, it makes sense to stand your ground, but anything bigger and it should be hardwired to flee.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.