[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/an/ - Animals & Nature

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: EASTERN-BLUEBIRD_3x4.jpg (720 KB, 2304x3072)
720 KB JPG
Why did everyone lie to me as a kid when they told me birds weren't reptiles? My middle school biology teacher was a lying bitch who made me feel stupid for calling birds reptiles.
>>
>>5151760
The only "true" reptiles alive today are lizards and snakes when you account the fact crocodiles and to an extant turtles are more related to birds than they are to the former.
>>
>>5151761
Actually the only true reptile alive today is your hag of a mother
>>
>>5151760
because they arent, theyre birds
>>
>>5151760
Your middle school biology teacher only cared about teaching people the Linnaean groups and not the evolutionary clades and the relationships between them, since they only wanted to teach you the defining traits of each group learning about cladistics would've made it more confusing than it needed to be.
>>
>>5151761
>>5151766
This except actually it's the jews
>>
>>5151772
.....which fall under the reptile classification
>>
>>5151760
You're an idiot. Do you run around telling everyone that trees are bacteria?
>>
>>5151833
Cladistics is not science. Nor did it invent classification by descent. That's revisionist history.
>>
>>5151875
What are you trying to get at dumbass? Trees don't share a bacterial ancestor with bacteria, they have completely different ancestry
>>
>>5151884
By cladistic standards, ALL multicellular organisms are bacteria. Hell most of them are bacteria twice - bacterial colonies with bacteria inside of their cells. If you actually knew anything about what you were talking about you would know that. This is exactly why cladistics is fake science.
>>
>>5151904
that's not even true though.
>>
>>5151904
>clades hurt my brain because that’s not how I’m used to using those words so they’re not real
Hunt any witches lately grug?
>>
>>5151904
Cladistics is based on evolution, bacteria doesn't just mean single-celled or prokaryote you fucking retard
>>
>>5151914
>>5151921
>>5151933
>Setting midwit shitlibs' tiny pea brains on fire by speaking basic simple truth about their delusional beliefs
Works every time. What's weird is that all of you think that animals and plants don't descend from bacteria. That's the strangest thing that you believe out of all of this. Cladistics is still fucking stupid. Claiming you're smart because you just say that anything that comes from something else must still be that thing doesn't actually make you smart. In fact it makes you insane. That's like saying instead of Grandma Johnson being a member of the Johnson family everyone that descends from her is still Grandma Johnson. That's fucking lunacy. But worse it's objectively false. And provably so.
>>
>>5152033
you're saying literally nothing
>>
File: silence retard.gif (740 KB, 220x217)
740 KB GIF
>>5152033
>That's like saying instead of Grandma Johnson being a member of the Johnson family everyone that descends from her is still Grandma Johnson. That's fucking lunacy.
i agree, because grandma johnson is a specific person, and no one claims that all birds are the same as a specific ancestral species of theirs. your grandma johnson example is analogous to someone saying every bird is an archaeopteryx just because they descend from archaeopteryx (i know they don't, but it's just an example), and funnily enough no one says that, because if they did, they'd be laughed out of the room

saying all birds are dinosaurs or reptiles or whatever is more directly analogous to claiming that all of grandma johnson's descendants are part of the johnson family, which would obviously be true
>>
>>5152054
So now you're going to try to tell me that cladists believe in the family unit? If that's true why do you spend so much time destroying families? By the way that are totally monophyletic, so there's not even actually a good excuse to do it. And yet...

As for the rest, you're clearly too stupid and disingenuous to grasp the argument. It's difficult to understand things when you have to spend so much energy lying about what you stand for. You can break this down anyway you want. The Johnson family could be descended from the Smith family but you would say that they were all still the Smiths, which is objectively not correct. Cladists have turned being wrong into a profession. Also it's fucking hilarious that autocorrect keeps trying to call cladists "Cletus".



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.