[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/an/ - Animals & Nature

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


Like how can we be able to live in propper peace with animals and the natural world? How can we build a future where conservation and human life can go together in harmony? How can we restore and maintain the natural balance of the world?
>>
>>5154369
Maybe future settlers on a distant frontier planet, but for Earth its basically joever if it remains on its current trajectory.
>>
>>5154369
Too late. Only would have worked if, instead of feeding indians, bangladeshis, africans and other trash and letting them multiply into billions, we wiped them out instead. The place will be a barren rubbish mountain hellscape before long
>>
Population control. Over 8 billion people is a ridiculous amount of biomass. All that needs to be catered to. Sure we can build upwards or be inventive with modernized farming but how well nature does is always balanced out with how much humanity uses it. Fortunately, people are planting forests and digging lakes. But we care too much about our survival to keep nature stable. Dispose the worst part of humanity first.
>>
>>5154369
i wish miyazaki did more of these morally ambiguous teen movies rather than children stories
you really cant right now, because theres too much emphasis on the arbitrary value of human life which is the correct response for a species, valuing itself and its own survival above all else. because of how humans function, they dont have a natural kill switch like other animals anymore, most mammals only live like 20 years at most before massive organ failure or inability to eat, while humans doesnt happen until after 40, and even then progression of science and society keeps putting that off and sets it to like 80+ now. so unless youre willing to kill boomers and reduce the levels of technology in the world to wood fires, or invent a perpetual motion machine, its never really going to happen.
>>
>>5154369
Matrix style AI enslavement. Either allow/give the choice to/force everyone living below a certain standard to live their life in a utopian AI where their mind is hooked up to a simulation that gives them a life free from all humanly suffering and interconnected to the rest of the plugged in humans and in return the people living in real earth get to utilize their biology for energy, organs, or whatever may be of use to the people still living in reality.
>>
>>5154369
Nope, a species only gets to human levels of evolution by destroying everything around it
>>
>>5154385
This is probably someone's fetish.
>>
>>5154369
We replace the shitty parts with ones we can live with. This is inevitable. It has to happen or your people suffer and die like thirdies.

>>5154380
Most of the overpopulation is not here. Europe and the US, excluding the recent migrant flood, are not overpopulated, and that’s relatively few people to send back (fuck islam and paganism anyways. convert or leave.)

With fewer people we got rid of mammoths and wolves



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.