I've been doing some research on canine transmissible venereal tumors (CTVTs), and have come to the conclusion that they are properly considered independent organisms of their own distinct species. They're unicellular, asexual, parasitical clonal colonies descended from dogs. As a group they've persisted for hundreds if not thousands of years. I've sought out counterarguments but none yet have convinced me. If you've got any novel ones, let's hear them.Otherwise speculate on the implications of there existing dogs with almost none of the features associated with dogs.
>>5169909ctvt isn't it's own species because it's funnier to classify it as a breed of domestic dog.
>>5169911Technically they should be classified as dogs either way by their ancestry, in the same way that humans are apes.But it is quite funny to imagine official recognition as an American Kennel Club breed.
>>5169909getting ball cancer from fucking is one thing but imagine taking a breath and getting leukemia
>>5169909They’re like nose cancer that Tasmanian devils get
>>5169911I just got the funniest idea for a psyop to play on the SMASHED AND SLAMMED people - breeding tumors.MICROMINI ALIEN TUMORBULLIES! UNDIFFERENTIATED AND CANCEROUS
