File: 4chanrandom.gif (1.26 MB, 240x356)

1.26 MB GIF

>>950899067
This copypasta fits here.

Criminals and cops are effectively the same.
They're teaming up against the workers and will try to isolate those who they believe might get scared into wageslaving to keep the cop+criminal team-up from having to do any real work themselves.
If you don't fold to the wageslave bullying attempt then instead you'd be pressured into commiting your life to your respective cop or criminal gang and give them your loyalty to become part of the "in" group(at the cost of probly getting murdered later if some other gang-member got his fefes hurt due to you existing).
Also..
Any loners trying to break out are usually accused of pedophilia to ruin their reputation since they lose on the vote count anyway and noone will bother questioning the pedocusation due to the fear of being pedocused themselves(quite an adorable little gimmick no? insta-kills normies and idiots)
Alternative treatment against loners is also any other ways to try to ruin a person's reputation.
The ones you see on regular bases on 4chan for example.
All this because it's apparently easier than just all of us being decent, honest people who don't cheat, take shortcuts or fall into any other generic mental pitfalls.
The halfmonkeys in a nutshell. Watch out tho we have guns and bombs and will kill you if you question us. Aren't we so cool.

Well it depends on the family. I was molested by an uncle. My dad was molested by an uncle. I always brlieved it is common until my frends at highschool told me I should call the police...

>>950900601
Unless your family is full of gay men that wasn't molesting. Before society went crazy over pedos all kinds of physical contact was normal. Think of it a bit like how people interact with pets. No sane person cares about where you rubbed the dog so long as you are not fondling its junk.
You could pat someone on the ass and it would not be treated as more sexual or significant than a handshake. At most it is being a bit playful. You do that now and people lose their minds and think it reasonable to permanently ruin a life over something so brief and trivial.

>>950899067
Media and general public mix pedophilia, hebephilia and ephebophilia under the same umbrella, ie. everybody who ever had a boner for anyone under 18 is a pedophile.

Pedophile: sexual attraction to pre-pubescent (10 years or younger)
Hebephile: sexual attraction to early pubescent (11-14 year olds)
Ephebophile: sexual attraction to late pubescent (15-19 year olds)

True pedophilia is sick shit, you want to have sex with kids that are not even developed to be able to do it without serious mental and physical harm.
Hebephilia is borderline sick, because you are taking advantage of a kid that might be biologically capable of sex, but mentally clearly not.
Ephebophilia is still frowned upon, as an adult clearly has advantage over a 16 year old and can convince-groom them to sick shit, but it won't necessarily cause mental and physical harm for a lifetime, and in some countries even the laws allow it to some degree, for example, over 16 years with and adult is not a crime.

So, getting a boner to a 17 year old, fully developed teenage girl who looks and dresses like an adult is the same in the eyes of the law as some sick fuck wanting to fuck a 2 year old.

But, in general, it's true that adults have an advantage over kids, even over/around 18 years old, and socially is also frowned upon.

So yeah, true, pre-pubescent attraction ie. pedophilia is rate, and IMHO not the same ballpark as wanting to fuck a 17 year old.

>>950901495
>Hebephilia is borderline sick
spoken like a true faggot. by that logic, eating meat is "sick" because you are exploiting an animal that has no chance against you. and our ancestors shouldnt have "taken" the land you live on, because they exploited nature for their benefit.

all our ancestors had teenage wives. faggot. when we stopped doing that, our birth rates started dropping. take a hint. twink cocksucker.

>>950905201
Its always ironic that none of the people that think like that would be alive were it not for their countless predecessors with happy healthy relationships that would be deemed vile and evil in modern times.

>>950899067
no not really but acting on the attraction is rare because it's been discouraged also pedophilia is not teens it is prepubescent meaning an attraction towards someone who hasn't reached puberty so the ages is much lower than where the outrage is directed towards.

>>950907134
>countless predecessors with happy healthy relationships
holy shit, anon thinks human history was a disney fairy tale. ask the feminists if they think our predecessors had "happy healthy relationships". obviously i dont give a fuck about feminists but you sound like youre a faggot who cares. so either youre gonna have to oppose feminism, or youre a retard who thinks human history consists of happy anime characters who lived in perfect harmony and consumed nothing but water and air. retard.

>>950909336
According to marriage statistics they were happier
up until the 1940's the divorce rate was basically nonexistent and has raised 450%

Most girls peak around 14-16 when they're at their most attractive and most fertile. Even by 18 a lot of them have starred hitting the wall

>>950909919
Source?

>>950911043
https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/series/sr_21/sr21_024.pdf

>>950911119
and this includes to recent times because that's just to 1960's
https://annaklaw.com/us-divorce-rates-by-year/#2020%E2%80%932023_Pandemic_Pause_And_Resurgence

it's not about money because it wasn't as bad during the great depression so it's just unhappy couples

And if you pay attention to the spikes
1940's rise of feminism + social pressure on age
1960'd sexual revolution
1980's no fault law
2018 decline
2020's pedo hysteria and social pressure to marry older
all this goes along with declining birth rates btw

Do you know who doesn't care about pedophiles? Brown people and that's why they're taking over

>>950901495
Unfortunately there are some insanely cute looking 9 year old Japanese girls.
Fortunately the 13 year old Japanese girls look even better.

>>950910019
BASED

there is a reason nature gives them a raging sex drive as early as 13. leave it to gay modern retards to think they know better than nature. the same people who think chopping off your dick makes you a woman. ffs.

>>950901495
You say
>taking advantage of
as if the only direction exploitation can happen is negative, even though the term is inherently neutral thus implying it can go either way.
A mature and responsible adult can easily impart a safety net for a younger person.
For instance not every college chick *should* go through the throes of getting sickly drunk and exposing themselves to extreme risk. An older and experienced adult around could easily assist them to still have fun exploring adulthood without exposing them to the same risk.
TL;DR, age differences can be weaponized either way. The question is if the risk of negative weaponization outweighs positive weaponization.

>>950909919
ok
#1 youre directly opposing the feminist narrative, saying the 1940s werent so bad and people were happier. on a baseline, if i dont get anything else that i want in politics, i would take the laws of the 1940s over what we currently have ANY DAY.
#2 cool story. so in other words, as women got more rights, people became less happy and the divorce rate increased? thanks for making my argument.
#3 lol, human history didnt start in 1940. we have 300,000 years of history on this planet. you best believe it wasnt "happy healthy relationships" that got us here..

>>950911668
this. and only this. every single country that has womens rights has declining birth rates and is slowly going extinct. and most countries that dont have womens rights are brown. maybe its time we learn our lesson. IQ isnt everything. being nice to women is a flaw. and as of right now, brownoids are outbreeding us. they will simply outlast us. and before we die out, most western countries will become majority muslim.

>>950912274
you think like a western faggot. nature isnt "nice", nor is it "just" or "fair". by nature, men are supposed to take advantage of women/ girls. thats why nature made us stronger. if we were meant to be equal, nature would have made us equally strong. its this gay christian and disney bullshit that is holding us back. MEN ARE NOT MEANT TO BE NICE.

is this a Kuro thread?

>>950912474
The divorce rate increased because you were no longer a social pariah if you got divorced, and if you were a woman, you could actually go to work and support yourself.
There's nothing bad about these things.

What this thread needs is better links...

>>950899067
Anon,, up until ~<100yrs ago everyone married and fucked whoever they likes regardless of age...

Age of 'consent' and marriage laws didn't exist until a certain community found refuge after being banned from 109 countries.

>>950912474
but i'm using that as starting point because that's when it was measured and you weren't a social pariah for it meaning people were getting divorced because unhappiness in their relationships which could have been caused by a multitude of reasons but the main point is it was less divorced people from then to now and it wasn't due to money which some might use but instead it's because they're unhappy and maybe a lot of bit of the popularizing of getting married to older instead of younger women because "SEXUAL DEVIANT ONLY LIKE WOMEN WHO ARE UNDER 18 I AM A CULTURED SEASONED WOMAN WITH DEPRESSION SHE ITH BUT A GURL"

File: HGH0BXdWMAANS6D.jpg (139 KB, 1440x938)

139 KB JPG

>>950912760
>There's nothing bad about these things.
there is everything bad about it. like i said, every country that embraced this is going extinct. if thats not bad to you, then you are retarded. natures only directive for you is to survive. you are so dumb and incapable, you cant even fulfill the one and only directive. you are literally a failure. if you were a toaster, manufactured in a factory, you would be sorted out by quality control because you cant toast. literally the one thing you were made to do. you are trash.

>>950913095
That's not true it was women because they don't have the same marriage problems and they like muslims are ok with pedophiles like christians are supposed to aswell

>>950913305
>going extinct
Yeah, that's not happening. Stop participating in white nationalist circlejerks.

>>950913389
It's absolutely true but the main enemy of white men is white women controlling them

>>950913431
Stop participating in incel circlejerks also.

File: HGH2yI1WAAAYhJo.png (47 KB, 649x306)

47 KB PNG

>>950913389
>Yeah, that's not happening
>all the data pointing towards cultures that give women rights are going extinct and/or will be replaced/ outbred by cultures that dont.
yeah ok. i will totally take your word, random internet retard.

>>950913467
It's in the graphs it's very obvious
white men are being treated like garbage and limiting themselves to satisfy women who don't respect them or provide for them

>>950913502
Uh huh, you let me know when those countries that are still thriving "go extinct" white nationalist incel.

>>950913591
They're very far from going extinct only westerners the white christians against pedophiles who are just normal heterosexual men btw are going extinct because they want to fight nature for some sour grapes hags policies

>>950913353
...it was unironically j*ws you actual retard. Do your research. Femisim didn't even get off the ground until some j*wish simp started backing them legally and financially.

>>950899067
Well since it does not exist, I would say pretty rare. Its a made up feminist concept. Feminist concepts are not real.

>>950913591
>that are still thriving
this is why discourse with leftists is pointless. i provided literal evidence of them NOT THRIVING - nevermind the influx of the opposing culture as "immigrants" and "refugees" (therefore accelerating the replacement) - and they still deny it.

>>950913790
In what ways are they not thriving.

>>950913731
dumb take. womens rights happened all over the world, but not in every country, only specific countries. the common factor wasnt jews, it was weak men. china has low birth rates just like japan. "da joos" is just cope by weak men who need a scapegoat for their own weakness. your dad has never slapped your mom. talk to him first before you put blame elsewhere.

>>950913731
But it's a walled old hags idea just a j*w knew it would elevate them so they joined in and didn't participate themselves.
Now you have supposed white nationalists and separatists who believe it themselves which is stupid.

File: 11-28-11pov_rev12-11-24_f3.png (83 KB, 1164x863)

83 KB PNG

>>950913817
which part of >>950913305 [graph goes down] do you not understand?

ironically, even those governments agree, thats why theyre importing a bunch of third-worlders because if they dont, the system will collapse because the economy cannot be sustained with such fertility rates. in other words, they arent thriving biologically, and theyre not even thriving economically. and surely a lefty faggot like you cares about the income gap? is that "thriving" to you?

>>950914018
These countries aren't on the brink of collapse in any way. These are literally just white nationalist "great replacement" boogeyman talking points.

>>950914117
>These countries aren't on the brink of collapse in any way
yes they are.

>>950913817
>>950913389
Japan and South Korea dropped to birthrates far below the replacement rate (the rate needed for a population to remain healthy and not decline over time). The US birthrates are also decreasing rapidly and approaching below the health replacement rate.

Why is this relevant?
The World Health Organization has been tracking and identifying this decline for years across every country on Earth. Countries have sought to improve their birthrates as a result to prevent a population collapse. South Korea is constantly giving more incentives and financial support for families with kids. Same for Japan. China started to remove their birth restrictions. Additionally, the US,, UK, Japan, and many others have recently sought to use mass immigration to improve birth rates and population. This did not have it's intended effect and the prime minister of Japan has since reverted their immigration stance.

>>950914173
>yes they are.
How?

>>950914185
If they lower the age again in japan pretty positive their birth rates will rise again

But knowing their business model of old men being the most successful only you might get get pedophile feudal lords which i find funny but the birth rates will improve

>>950913841
>But what about
>Uh you're right but...

Yeah, nah don't reply to me again leftoid.

>>950914257
>How?
>>950913305
learn to read

>>950914283
I don't think any leftist is against women's rights

>>950914320
You're not explaining how low birth rates = imminent collapse.
You just keep going in circles.

>>950914283
as per usual, people like you dont have counter arguments. why does china and japan have low fertility rates and how are they both connected to jews? you are so "right" you cant even explain it. pathetic loser.

>>950914372
i am not a leftist. if europe becomes majority arab, then they collapsed. simple as. cocksucking retard.

>>950914384
>you dont have counter arguments
Holy irony.

I'll wait until you provide an argument. Until then stop wasting my time.

>>950914449
So you actually can't explain.
Got it.

>>950914471
>I'll wait until you provide an argument
>>950913841
your dad is a faggot who is "nice" to your mom. he thinks she should have the right to vote and has never slapped her to correct her.
>>950914384
china isnt part of the western banking system - yet they have decreasing birth rates.

>>950914533
i did. you cant read cause youre retarded. got it.

@topic
long story short: 14 is prime.

>>950914569
>your mom! lol XD
Thanks for once again proving my point.

>>950914596
No you just said two things and never connected them.

>>950914684
lol

>>950914686
yes i did.

>>950914683
Lina Medina would disagree.

>>950914683
tsmt also fuck hags and their supporters since they're killing us off

>>950914745
NO, YOU DIDN'T.

>>950914878
>>950914745

>>950915090
Ok, you're just a child. I regret wasting my time on this exchange.

I think it's sad that the whole Left vs right thing literally boils down to feelings vs logic and proof.

Left just simply ignores logic and evidence and thinks their feelings are proof.

Right provides logical explanations with evidence and makes it clear that emotions shouldn't be proof or reason for law.

>>950915214
says the child who cant read graphs or understand simple sentences. nevermind the fact that you cant even back your dumb argument on how europe is thriving. cocksucking faggot.

So what i'm reading is there's an anon i completely agree with and another who thinks that brown society is failing because he thinks they're not converting their immigrants and able to make new workers with lower birth rates which means more brown people which makes no sense as an argument

bottom line:
- every country where its legal to marry and breed a 15 y/o is thriving
- every country where 15 y/o girls are sent to school and college to get railed by football teams and then to settle down at 35 and (maybe) have a child, is going extinct

>>950909336
I oppose feminism and no one said or implied that everyone had a happy relationship in the past.
Modern people like to act as if a loving relationship below a certain age range is abusive and terrible despite countless past relationships through all human history contradicting that stupid notion. Think before you speak. Its easy to figure out what others are saying if you do.

children are ugly. that'st the real reason pedophilia is wrong. children can consent---look at the girl polanski raped, she said she basically enjoyed it. i would have children who got molested executed because they are damaged goods

>>950917651
>children are ugly
Thousands of years of reproduction directly contradict this.

>>950917587
Modern Feminists and leftists really conflate the life of women and marriage pre 1900s. Reality is that most women (and children) really didn't mind or enjoyed their relationships. Modern retards would have you think that every woman was being raped daily and they were all enslaved by men.

... despite men being the only one making and bringing home money their entire lives to take care of their wife and kids.

File: kuro_drink.webm (157 KB, 1280x720)

157 KB WEBM

>>950912670
It can be if you want it to

>>950919459
Hydration break

File: 1773918726382546.jpg (103 KB, 652x900)

103 KB JPG

>>950919459

>>950919528
Kuro's eroi tummy....
>>950919480
Hydrating by licking Kuro's sweat

>>950919555
Where is your Kuro pic?

File: Kurostage4.png (1.61 MB, 750x1062)

1.61 MB PNG

>>950919597
here

File: 1778599881828850.jpg (591 KB, 744x1052)

591 KB JPG

>>950919637

File: 1782786519292787.png (1.9 MB, 1250x1198)

1.9 MB PNG

>>950919716

File: 1753540269056803.jpg (211 KB, 1280x779)

211 KB JPG

>>950919731

File: kuro illya miyu cyberpunk.jpg (250 KB, 1000x1100)

250 KB JPG

>>950919758

File: 1782711945375915.jpg (206 KB, 1362x1980)

206 KB JPG

>>950919828

File: kuro illya miyu wedding b(...).jpg (344 KB, 1000x1100)

344 KB JPG

>>950919856

File: 1762678816531083.jpg (200 KB, 1279x1711)

200 KB JPG

>>950920010

Too old

File: 1623988916713.jpg (116 KB, 936x661)

116 KB JPG

>>950921354

>>950924234
Way too old.

May as well be in her mid 50s

>>950917651
>children are ugly
???
thats like saying women are ugly. some are, some are not. wtf? also, as explained in >>950901495, the definition of "children" is quite important. technically a 17 y/o is a "chiId"

All of this brain power! And still beating the same dead horse!

that's because the horse isn't dead actually

>>950899067
>Is pedophilia really that rare?
most studies show it's like 40% of men are "pedo" but only because the studies include girls 13-18 as pedo bait
Some Australian study did change the age range to like 8-10 and still 40% of men admitted the looked at or searched for stuff of girts that age. It's absurdly common, just women control the social world now so they can poo poo on it to make men feel bad to give their hag bodies more sexual value

>>950931785
Don't forget the jews

>>950899477
>Any loners trying to break out are usually accused of pedophilia to ruin their reputation since they lose on the vote count anyway and noone will bother questioning the pedocusation due to the fear of being pedocused themselves(quite an adorable little gimmick no? insta-kills normies and idiots)
women use this tactic too but it applies even up to 25 years old

everybody knows women are hottest in their teenage years but if you fuck a teenager whoever owns that girl has you by the balls for the rest of your life

>>950926636
>technically a 17 y/o is a "chiId"
I don't think "technically" is the right word to use there at all. You could say that she was "technically" underage or it was "technically" while she was under your care or sometihng like that, but to say "technically" 17 is a child is just using their terminology. The word "child" is something everyone understands.

They are calling people something they're not to manipulate people. Same as how they say a minor can't consent so it's always "rape". So if you have consensual sex with someone under the age of 18, even if you yourself are under 18 - so most people in the world - you're literally a child rapist.

Most people in the world are a child rapist according to them. There is something really gone completely wrong with a lot of those people, just look at any comments online when any sort of discussion about this type of thing takes place, all the violent psychopaths show themselves.

>>950932744
I am seriously considering moving to a muslim country. there are some that have an acceptable living standard and generally let you be non-muslim as long as you dont draw attention, while providing all the perks of a muslim culture: multiple wives, marrying a 14 y/o, no feminism/ gay/ tranny shit anywhere. if I had a great business idea that doesnt require high IQ employees, I would totally start my business there. I cant wait till the muslims take over the west, this will take too long, I want to have children soon.

>>950912060
proof?

>>950931785
What study are you talking about? do you have link?

File: 1780722871351500.jpg (471 KB, 1536x1920)

471 KB JPG

>>950899067

>>950899067
seems pretty common here on 4chan, I'll tell you that much.

>>950941450
based epstein besides the letting people hurt children allegedly

>>950934540
>just look at any comments online when any sort of discussion about this type of thing takes place
its a fucking black pill nightmare. not only do the feminist npcs come out of the woodwork, but also normie fake-alphas who want to virtue signal about how tough and manly they are, "if you did that to my daughter, i would break your skull!! my daughter is a sweet innocent angle!! how dare you!!" fucken disgusting

>>950941450
if we lowered the age of consent to 14, epstein would've been a failed math teacher because trapping powerful men with teen sex wouldn't be blackmail material. think on that.

>>950899067
When a well-adjusted man has a kid or spends time around children, he understands the value in being a protector of that child's innocence.
Society systemically has no interest in raising well adjusted men or giving men the financial and quality of life means to have children and raise them.

>>950946632
Half the issue was that the Epstein children were trafficked.
And if we lowered the AoC and legalized trafficking, there is still an inherent power imbalance in age gap sexual dynamics that power-hungry men would look to exploit.

>>950914185
I really don't know if we need more people the more efficient things become. The industrial revolution saw the rise of treating people like cattle who actually could fill up factory positions in the hundreds if not thousands. When you look at big tech they only really employ a few thousand engineers, salesman, and operational managers per company. A single person is given huge leverage over a swath of assets. There isn't enough positions in the economy if one person can essentially do the job of 50 in the past. It's an ugly but natural byproduct of technology making things streamlined. Farms in the past had to employ hundreds of people for harvesting time. Now you get 1 combine for hectares of land.

>>950947193
>the Epstein children were trafficked
no they werent. the media just says they were "trafficked" because "children cant consent". but in reality, epstein had scouts that would loiter around schools and ask girls if they wanted to "massage" a dude for 200 bucks. and all the "victims" said yes. not a single one was abducted or kidnapped. they all came voluntarily. a bunch of them went back to school and recruited their friends. and "power-imbalance" is cope lingo by feminists and faggots. there is ALWAYS a power imbalance. 2 people are never equal. if you dont want your daughter to jerk off old guys, dont let her go out without your supervision. works in muslim countries.

>>950947103
that's faggot talk. real man are savages and predators. if you have scruples then you are a herbivore faggot. you sound like you couldn't cut a cute animal's throat. our ancestors were savage predators. >>950916029

>>950899067
Yes. Attraction to actual children is rare and abhorrent. The anime girls you jerk it to are not actual or realistic depictions of children, but rather a form of ageplay. Most lolis are just petite adult women and talk like them. Even the ones made to be child-like have post-pubescent features like hip/waist/shoulder ratio. Just look up that one Scorpions album on wikipedia that had a naked 10 year old on it and you'll be able to see if you're a pedo or not. Psyop-ing yourself into thinking you're a pedo just because you masturbate to cartoon anime girls that would have been considered standard 10-15 years ago is retarded and you should feel bad.