/b/ - We can dance if you want to. - Random


08/21/20	New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17	New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16	New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]

Anonymous
10/13/26(Tue)23:11:48 No.955082117

File: 1791846826531363.png (1.27 MB, 1920x1080)

1.27 MB PNG

Anonymous 10/13/26(Tue)23:11:48 No.955082117

We can dance if you want to.

Anonymous
10/13/26(Tue)23:17:38 No.955082324

Anonymous 10/13/26(Tue)23:17:38 No.955082324

File: 1788050191776573.mp4 (524 KB, 432x688)

524 KB MP4

>>955082117
>there is too much similarity
No, there flatly isn't. Have you tried actually reading any of this shit? The Sumerians thought everyone just spends the rest of eternity eating clay in a dark cave. Egyptians thought you'd either be deleted or go to a paradise (with variations, they were around for nearly 4 thousand years). Hindus thought you'd come back a billion times to play different roles. Buddhists thought similarly, except it was more of a game of chance and that it's rigged/sucks. Etc. They're all heavily contradictory and mutually exclusive.
>Almost all versions of the afterlife have a version of heaven/paradise and hell/the underworld and souls going to either accordingly based on moral actions
Nope, this is almost exclusively a Christian/Muslim obsession, even Jews barely have a notion of afterlife, and all you have to do to get the premium package is to follow 7 basic bitch laws, or you get a punishment that can last up to 6 months, maybe end up being deleted if you're *that* shitty, but overall they care a lot less about the "next world".
>how would you even do that?
Well the ones making the claim are the ones who have to figure it out. There have been attempts at getting people in hospital to "see" shit when they're near-death, not really successful.
>There are too many NDEs reported
Yes, and none of them pass even the smell test, let alone any actual rigor. It's all vibes.
>definitionally, the spiritual realm/afterlife is outside observable tangible material reality therefore you need to adjust the scope of what constitutes evidence
Well that's just very convenient isn't it? It just gets to assert itself as real but not provide any actual evidence.
>Absolute pure materialism
No one is a "materialist", the correct term is physicalism for the sake of pedantry, and at any rate
>logically questionable faith-based claim and not rational nor does the evidence bear it out with certainty