You're afraid of dying before reproducing, afraid of not passing your genes forward.
a lil bit but not that much I'm way more afraid of dying in general
I love having sex with big tall men with dicks way bigger than mine
>>955114349What is the reasoning behind this statement?
>>955114349The atheist position ultimately collapses under its own weight because it lacks a sufficient foundation for the very concepts it relies on, such as logic, morality, and reason. Without God, there is no ultimate standard by which truth, ethics, or rationality can be objectively grounded. The atheist is left appealing to consensus, whether it be the authority of experts or the majority opinion of a culture, but these are contingent and mutable. What is considered "rational" or "moral" today may be overturned tomorrow, and without a transcendent source, there is no fixed reference point to judge between competing systems, nor the possibility of authoritative claims.If the laws of logic are immaterial, universal, and unchanging, then they cannot arise from a purely material, time-bound, and subjective universe. If reason is a valid pathway to truth, then it must be anchored in something greater than human brains that evolved through random processes for survival, not truth. If moral obligations are real and not merely preferences, they require a moral lawgiver whose nature defines goodness.In denying God, the atheist still borrows from the Christian worldview to make arguments, trusting in the a priori existence of reason, logic, and objective morality, even while rejecting the only foundation that makes those concepts meaningful. Thus, atheism is internally incoherent. It presupposes the very things that only the existence of God can account for, and in doing so, it affirms what it seeks to deny. Without God, the possibility of intelligible experience itself collapses. Atheism is self-refuting
>>955114526Damn, you must be a faggot then.
>>955114349Lol no. Why would I care about that?
>>955114526Naturally.
>>955114617It's easy to define God as simply a trancendental property, instead of a cause for the existence of the world possessing a personality.
>>955114617>. Without God, there is no ultimate standard by which truth, ethics, or rationality can be objectively grounded.this is not true
>>955114349I was dead for 17 minutes. It straight up felt like a DMT trip. Don't be afraid.
>>955114349I'd actually rather not
>>955114349I have never wanted children. But okay, tell me more about myself
>>955114526>>955114689>>955114918If youre going to samefag, it helps if youre not a namefag
>>955114349All the generations before me had sex and it ends with me :)
>>955114617I don't think that human brains evolved randomly. I'm absolutely certain aliens were involved in curbing the offshoot evolutionary lines resulting in abnormalities, and had a major hand influencing or outright controlling evolution in general.
>>955119438Human brains aren't special compared to other animal brains. We just think they are because we are the ones experiencing an existence thanks to one.
>>955114689I’m a woman
>>955119562Tits or gift
>>955114349Believe me - having children makes your fear of death WORSE.You're constantly wondering how your potential death could fuck them up for life.Do you have a large enough life insurance policy?Wtf is your wife going to do without you?Passing your genes forward doesn't fix *any* of that.
>>955114349I'm afraid of being too poor to raise my child, which is almost guaranteed the way people think. But I'm more afraid of my balls being dry which they are. Because then I'm not even no tasty snack.
>>955120615what a good price for life insurance, I'm paying $50 a month for $100,000 coverage
>>955114617This is a version of the transcendental argument for God (TAG), associated with Van Til, Bahnsen, and Greg Bahnsen’s debates in particular.The argument depends on three unproven premises: that only theism can ground logic, reason, and morality; that the alternatives are mere consensus; and that theism itself escapes the same regress. Each is contestable, and the third seems false, since the theist must also treat God’s nature as a brute foundation and also trusts fallible faculties to find it. The most the argument establishes is that every worldview has unexplained starting points, which is a reason for humility all around, not a refutation of atheism.BGV is a better argument for theism, btw, but you might not find a copypasta for it like you did for this one.
>>955114349
