Posting a few upscales from other threads, and taking requests.Upscaling increases the resolution of images, fills in details, sharpens away blurriness, etc. It's a fraught process. You can't recover signal that's not there, only infer. In some cases, it can lead to a lot of facial drift, while in other cases, the image just looks overly embossed/sharpened, or a more crisp kind of grainy.But when it works, it works, and is good both for increased enjoyment, and lends itself better to edits, since there are more pixels to edit, and no dissonant mismatch between blurry / poorly illuminated features and the alterations of the editing model.
I got a few of her if you are interested
>>956306691
Request?
>>956307107
>>956307107>>956307332Oh wow these are great! Thanks Wiz!
>>956306645Can you please do this one too Wiz?
Any possibility here?
I'm not going to upscale nudes in this thread. It's not because I'm against nudes, and in fact, making better nudes is a major motivation for upscaling in the first place. However, there's a dicey philosophical line between enhancing nudes and creating nudes, especially where upscaling adds a lot of detail, and the line points toward a likely ban for nudify edits.
>>956307514Of course, anon. I'm not 100% thrilled with these, but my GPU is slow, I don't have the luxury of picking the best of 5 edits. Just have to roll with what we've got.
>>956307729I see what you mean. This sort of still looks like her, but could be someone else too lol
>>956307775Yeah, exactly. One could refine further and get more fidelity, but resources are, sadly, limited. I'd say for NSFW applications, upscaling works best on body and clothing rather than facial details. Nearly all upscaling models and tools have a tendency to make skin a bit more "leathery", add age, etc., in an effort to impart "detail", and it's something one has to fight against. Naturally, it's a stochastic process and the fight isn't altogether successful.
>>956307588But of course.
>>956306633any luck with her? got more in case
>>956307856I don't mind the "detail" on the skin so much, as long as it still looks like the girl you know
>>956307935Yeah, sometimes it works out, sometimes it doesn't. You can usually get something pretty good if you can crank out several edits and just pick the best one. That's a bit of a luxury in this case. If this proves popular, I'll spin up a rented GPU and produce at more industrial scale, maybe.There are trade-offs with upscaling. It's not quite accurate to say that it's a 4K version of the reality depicted in a 640x480 pic. Compromises are made.Still, once you upscale, it's hard to go back. Blurry pics become insufferable.
>>956307886
>>956307882Fantastic job that’s my favorite pic of my sister and her slutty friend
Soft focus filters just kill me, any chance of saving this?
>>956307747
>>956308126I wish I could take credit, but just got lucky with the dice roll and the many passes. Pic definitely very hot. And with the vivid colours, I knew it'd turn out well.
>>956307933
Is this possible?
>>956307972
>>956308257Thank you, great work
>>956308272Everything's possible. :) I fear there may be facial drift with this one. Let's see what happens. Either way, it's in the queue.
>>956308127I tried. I'm not sure I succeeded, especially as far as skin tone, and am willing to re-run if this doesn't cut it.
>>956308272Here's a first pass. I'm going to run another with a more intensive process, this one's a hard case.
>>956307514Still really hoping you do this one Wiz>>956306645
>>956308272I'm not sure this is better at all, but sharing is caring anyway.
Hopefully this will workBack from the days of MMS pics
>>956308796Totally, sorry, just spaced out on this one for some reason.
>>956309082This size might work better
>>956309126Damn this is amazing! Thanks Wiz!
>>956309082>>956309148This looks like a fun project, almost a labour of love, like restoring and remastering old tapes or something. But I said I wouldn't do nudes in this thread, I probably need to stick to that. Sorry.
>>956307808Feel like running this one too Wiz?
>>956309225Also got this from her?
