Women either demand Chad or "provider men" who fully fund their lifestyle but are unwilling to do anything traditional women do, because cooking and cleaning and blowjobs are oppressive. They also refuse to have kids.Is there a political solution to this? Will this resolve itself once the population collapse starts hitting the economy and society begins to unravel on a basic level?
>>24512604We're all waiting for the robosex with artificial womb implant. Once that arrives, total foid death is imminent.
>>24512605It's simply not happening within our lifetimes, or likely ever. Society will collapse long before this becomes a viable solution for any regular person.
We just had this thread. Good times.
>>24512604>provider manso a betabuxxer? kek
>>24512604No blowjobs? What the fuck do they do? Just exist?
>>24512604>tolerating women's bullshit>in 2036-10lol get fucked cunt.
>>24512609They sleep with half the chads in your city, behind your back.
I got laid a lot and now want a femdom wife to cuck me while i give her my paycheck the end game of being a chad is being a beta
>Women either demand Chad or "provider men" who fully fund their lifestyle Can you explain to me why else they would date someone they're clearly not drawn to?You can't have your cake and eat it too, either accept this arrangement or be alone, or find the girl who finds you "Chad" enough to stay with you for free.
>>24512609They let you watch them get fucked by chad (if you’re lucky they bestow that privilege).
>>24512613They're "not drawn to" non-chads because they're porn and sex addicted degenerates who think extreme hedonism is empowerment.
>>24512604pixel meta sink or swim
>>24512605>>24512606Robowombs are already commercially available. $100,000. Already cheaper than a woman and you won't have someone fucking up your kids.
>non-virgin whoreMay as well be invisible
>>24512604Mufuka GET YO WIMMEN IN LINE!Work on yo pimp hands!
>>24512605>We're all waiting for the robosex with artificial womb implant. Once that arrives, total foid death is imminent.If anyone can make it viable and cheap, it's ELON! #MAKE WOMEN GREAT FINALLY
>>24512604how is you being an ugly loser politics?
>>24512615>because they're porn and sex addicted degenerates who think extreme hedonism is empowerment.this is just you projecting on nebulous "women" to justify your inability to attract them, though.
>>24512622>projectingI'm pretty sure I don't go on tinder and bang a different 9/10 babe every week, which is how modern women fry their neurons with chads.
>>24512604>Is there a political solution to this? Will this resolve itself once the population collapse starts hitting the economy and society begins to unravel on a basic level?Womanbrains are incapable of accountability, they see the world as just a bunch of things happening to them which have nothing to do with their own actions. It could literally reach the point of crashed birth rates, no electricity, no running water, total supply chain collapse, and women would still be sitting around in chad harems thinking "I can't believe society did this to me".
>>24512623>I'm pretty sure I don't go on tinder and bang a different 9/10 babe every weekSee, this is you projecting your sexual fantasies on "women".If you had 10% of the SMV of your average woman you'd actually sleep with a different woman every week, pumping and dumping them, treating them like sex dolls. Which ironically is exactly what all men do when given the chance. But you simply can't.So you construct a caricature of "women", by projecting your inner sexual fantasies on them, mixed with a grain of relatable truth (you being a gonner incel porn addict), in a severe case of sour grapes.
>>24512607It's not the same thread at all. The topic may be women but I'm not a 1pbtid gayreek bot.>>24512608>>24512609Yes, the new demand is to exist at the expense of a man.>>24512613>Can you explain to me why else they would date someone they're clearly not drawn to?Money.>You can't have your cake and eat it tooTell it to the women currently ushering in the downfall of human civilization.>>24512625>Which ironically is exactly what all men do when given the chance.Most men want families, actually. You think like a whore because you are one, and are surrounded by whores.
>>24512626So are they beards or escorts
>>24512626>Most men want families, actually.The men what want families form families.You don't see any actually sexually successful man complaining about not being able to form a family, because they either do it effortlessly, or in the majority of cases just don't bother because sleeping with a different woman every week is more fulfilling to the male mind and ego.Men unable to get a woman saying "I just want a family" is as believable as lolicons saying "I just like drawings"
Women want providers because that’s the least we can do as compensation after men have spent millennia taking their rights away. Why would any woman want uneducated, unhygienic, hateful, insecure, cruel and aggressive basement dwelling faggots like you who view them as subhuman? That’s the main issue with all incels and so called ‘nice guys’. You treat women like shit and get mad when they don’t fall at your feet and cater to your every whim. If the same thing was expected of you, it would put you all into psychosis
>>24512950nice bait
>>24512628>You don't see any actually sexually successful man complaining about not being able to form a familywhat a retarded post, sincerely
i'm not interested in your nigger shit
>>24512604so how it works is if this sort of thing stops you from having sex then you have a weak sex drive and should not reproduce because we don't need men with weak sex drives.same goes for women. If they go too far out of their way to avoid having sex then they shouldn't be reproducing anyways. this is literally how evolution keeps the bloodline pure and strong. By weeding you out of it.
>>24512999>Bait is when someone breaks up my /pol/troon echo chamber and tells me the truth
>>24513000>what a retarded post, sincerelyhe's 100% right
>>24513052he's right because he posted a pointless tautology. it adds nothing to the discussion
>>24513057My point was about involuntarily celibate men, ergo men with 0% ability of acting "immorally" (ergo similarly to their depiction of "roasites") by their own standards, cannot possibly be trusted in their claim about their "pure" goals, different from "bad men"As I often say, we can just look at how men with actual nearly unlimited access to hedonistic sex behave: homosexuals and "chads", to a lesser degree incels-turned-trannies too.They make even the wholly fictional caricature of "roasties" that incel communities made up, look like nuns in comparison.
>>24513091You do realize that their movement is purely just about hating women, right? They don't care in the least about "morality". They want to punish women for having sex, but you will never catch them condemning men for engaging in "degenerate" sexual behavior. In fact, they outright cheer for said behavior, hence why you see /r9k/ and /pol/ users idolizing "abusechads" and so forth. Men who identify as incels are the most depraved, degenerate, porn-obsessed cretins on the face of the earth. The "traditionalist puritan" LARP is just a pathetic coping mechanism that allows them to pretend like they don't actually want to have sex anyways because "sex is sinful and degenerate".
>>24513172I am well aware. I just can't help myself when faced with such hypocrisy though i g.And for anyone with even a modicum of familiarity with incel spaces like /pol/ or /r9k/ it's easy to recall many examples of "robots" glowing up (don't remember the historical lingo they used) and then becoming absolute degenerate man whores, proving it was all just 100% cope all along. I mean the whole "Chad" mythology was not just a tongue-in-cheek joke, they actually both envied and cheered him on in his exploitation of women.
