[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/bant/ - International/Random

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


Janitor acceptance emails will be sent out over the coming weeks. Make sure to check your spam folder!


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1783198688052112.jpg (263 KB, 1290x1144)
263 KB JPG
Racists are racist up until the moment when they meet a racist who calls out the initial racist's non-white DNA.
Once that is found and some other Nazi decides to exclude the initial racist on his racial characteristic not being pure enough, the initial racist immediately starts screeching about racism and how he is being treated as a second-class citizen due to having non-white admixture.

For example, if we are trying to maintain the purity of the German race and exclude all people who have non-German blood from German land, all the Americans who have moved to Germany and who happen to be right wing will immediately oppose any such regime because that regime would get rid of them and all of their posterity.
In such a case, the so-called right-wing racists become exactly the same as minorities in their rhetoric.
They wish for the overtone window of brownness and for the standards of whiteness to be low enough to include them, but not include people below them in that racial hierarchy.
And they fail to see how this slippery slope will eventually bring these standards down to the level where it would include all brown people who have at least 1 percent of white DNA.
>>
Shut the fuck up faggot, racism is for Americans who have to live around actual niggers, not dancing coconut African "refugees" in your tiny little safe enclave of canned fish, I'm talking hardcore niggers, you faggot, 1% of nigger DNA means nothing and you got big weird red lips.
>>
>>24744407
>1% of n*gger DNA means nothing and you got big weird red lips.

This is exactly the overtone window I'm talking about.
This is exactly what I described above about the initial racist becoming hostile once somebody else who is more pure than that initial racist calls out the initial racist's lack of purity.

I will green text quote that passage for people who missed it or refused to engage with it, which is (you):
>Once that is found and some other Nazi decides to exclude the initial racist on his racial characteristic not being pure enough, the initial racist immediately starts screeching about racism and how he is being treated as a second-class citizen due to having non-white admixture.
>>
File: 37.jpg (2 KB, 82x125)
2 KB JPG
rent free
>>
>>24744424
This is 4chan. Race and related issues are an inherent part of it. Of course, they're rent-free, you don't pay for usage of this website.
>>
File: yea.jpg (483 KB, 1148x1746)
483 KB JPG
>>24744427
https://youtu.be/KWxDGQm2hKk
>>
>>24744390
That's called the no true Scotsman fallacy
>>
File: cern.jpg (211 KB, 373x600)
211 KB JPG
>>24744447
i like sad songs
>>
>>24744475
What is the attraction for you
>>
>>24744424
Kek
This, hes actually buckbroken
>>
File: who is.jpg (285 KB, 720x537)
285 KB JPG
>>24744542
the melancholy
>>
File: name.png (912 KB, 768x1104)
912 KB PNG
>>24744546
he's me
i'm samefagging; again

https://youtu.be/OnFM-l6sEc0
>>
>>24744447
>No true Scotsman, or appeal to purity, is an informal fallacy in which one modifies a prior claim in response to a counterexample by asserting the counterexample is excluded by definition.
You gotta elaborate on how.
If accept the existence of this fallacy in regards to ethnic purity then it's a case for multiculturalism.
How do we define a person who is white?
How do we define a person who is German or Polish?
Every single definition that can be given to anyone being any of the above can be refuted with the no-true Scotsman fallacy.
Up until the point we justify a person being Polish if he has only 1% of Polish DNA.
I'll repeat in different words from *your* persepective:
>A person who is 1% Polish is Polish. If you disagree, you're committing a no true Scotsman fallacy.

That's meaningless drivel that might be useful in rhetoric but has no place in discussion of race and ethnic issues.
>>
>>24744390
Russia is winning
>>
its the thought that matters, nobody can move a mountain overnight but if everybody's pushing small rocks here and there changing society by little bits at a time then eventually you'll be moving mountains every day
thats how we got into the situation we're in and its the only way out



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.