[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/bant/ - International/Random

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: IMG_5248.png (324 KB, 1280x1600)
324 KB PNG
How the fuck does Stone Toss never miss?!?!
>>
>>24832730
Thats retarded
>>
The AI is trained on the photos taken by the guy on the bottom. The "AI" wouldn't be able to make anything if the guy on the bottom didn't take pictures.
>>
>>24832730
>photography
>art
you can only choose one
>>
>>24832731
This. Shere is sus tho
>>
>>24832730
kinda sus
>>
>>24832730
giant amogus
>>
>>24832730
There's a difference between capturing a real physical moment in time with intentional framing and feeding 50 terabytes of uncredited, stolen art into a plagiarism blender just to get an image with seven fingers on one hand
>>
>>24832732
The photographer wouldn't be able to take pictures if someone hadn't built him the machine
>>
>>24832734
Flash on top of the camera (big sus)
>>
>>24832735
why is /pol/ and stonetoss stuck in 2020, you uncs are still making sus jokes in the big 26 nah thats crazy fr
>>
>>24832732
You didn't make the picture. You only promoted the camera to make it
>>
>>24832737
You really didn't need the meme flag for this post anon, its very clear you're a commie rat
>>
>>24832737
difference is git gud
>>
>>24832737
you sound gay and your shits all retarded
>>
>>24832742
>>24832743
>>24832744
Only Indians defend AI
>>
AI represents the singular greatest theft and crime against all of humanity.
>>
>>24832733
Seriously.
>>
>>24832735
>>24832736
Egregiously sus
>>
>>24832733
this is the truth, but most artfags are pussies who will not admit photography is not art so they lose all debates on this topic.
>>
>>24832745
Only communists give a shit about AI art, sorry you lost your furry commission to a computer bub.
I applaud anything that puts leftists out of work.
>>
>>24832746
and our choices are to use it or shun it
>>
>>24832735
Sussy in the bussy
>>
>>24832730
Drawn by someone that does not understand photography.
Understanding the exposure triangle, focus stacking(often used with macro), and everything involved is not as simple as point and shoot....
>hur dur. you just push burton and it go chickuh!
>>
>>24832737
You lost Troon. get a real career. Photography is for fags and women. You can get a position as photographer if you serve in the military, which is something a man would do. Part of why your generation is so weak is your faggy ass obsession with pretty pictures. My generation had men who worked with their hands and fought wars so our nation could be prosperous, that's what we did. The bank of mom and dad is CLOSED. All your generation wants is free everything. Free food, free houses, free jobs. You need to earn your way like everyone else and quit bitching, you sound like the women you pretend to be
>>
>>24832737
Yeah but making A.I. assisted art is hard because you have to know the right prompts and parameters and which models to use.
>>
>>24832733
>>24832749
Studio Photography can be artistic. Light metering, color theory, set design, subject design and placement, all things that are present in graphic design, ad design, typography, etc. Natural Photography like wildlife and landscapes rely on luck a lot of the time, so I guess it's arguably less artistic.
At the end of the day, if a pic makes you feel something, anything at all, it's art.
>>
>>24832739
Not for macro. It's fine on top then. It just has to be diffused and not pointed directly at the subject. Angled to be a bounced light to keep it looking natural prevents any eye reflection.
>>
>>24832730
A retard logic I expected Stonetoss to have
>>
>>24832730
You can call anything art if you want. The problem with AI art is the pajeets that make it never make anything interesting. Yeah photography has a lower skill floor than traditional art, but at least some of it is worth looking at.
>>
>>24832746
dilate tranny

you're just mad ai won't entertain your delusional fantasies
>>
>>24832753
I think you missed the point
that there's technique involved applies to both
>>
>>24832733
If music using synths is art then digital photography too, obviously the former requires more talent but good photography requires knowledge in many visual areas.
Sadly jews co-opted photography theory in schools completely so good photography is rarely championed.
>>
AI is great, and we should make it ubiquitous and accessable to all.

Tired of people arguing about it.

Lived through this already.

Cell phones.
Internet.
Computers.

People bitched and moaned. Now our entire society is different and we have moved on.

The same thing will happen with AI.

Stop hating it because it's trendy.
Understand that the ubiquity will happen, and the sooner you get the fuck over it and move on, the better your life will be, because you'll stop wasting time complaining about some shit that's happening no matter what you do.
>>
>>24832749
Painting isnt art either. The only true artists are the pigment makers, you reductionist purity-spiraling faggot.
>>
>>24832750
You are brown
>>
>>24832754
lmao, seethe boomie, you stole everything and now attempt to sell it to your offspring but nobody's buying. Yes it will be free. We will take it. What are you going to do? We'll put you in a nursing home and let you rot. You deserve it
>>
>>24832740
SUS
>>
>>24832764
>The only true artists are the pigment makers
what like Yves Klein?
>>
>>24832754
Correction-
Only boomers and Indians are enthralled by AI
>>
>>24832732
you stupid fuck, you're so blind you really have no clue how much camera produced images differ from real life.
when you look at a photo you're not looking at something real, you're looking at a construct translated to you by technology.
all the various settings and sensors and optics all have a huge impact on the final image.
tldr if you think a camera produces real images of actual life you're a fucking retard and taking many things for granted
>>
>>24832765
Seethe tranny
>>
File: 1766542984408057.jpg (115 KB, 1139x900)
115 KB JPG
>>24832735
>>
>>24832763
The tech is great, don't get me wrong, but "creating AI art" is about as impressive as googling an image.
>>
>>24832770
Nigger, seeing is literally just reflections of light and your brain interpreting it. Miss me with your gay faggotry shit. I did notice that when I pointed out that the AI LITERALLY CANNOT EXIST WITHOUT THE BOTTOM you faggots were upset.
>>
im a real artist that can draw and i am good at taking photos too and i use ai to generate art. the "slop" is in your mind. the truth is ai gives people the tools to express themselves but most people are retarded, lazy, and have shit taste. the slop is a result of the soul not the tool
>>
>>24832775
>the slop is a result of the soul not the tool
Based and correct
>>
>>24832770
The camera captures and translates light in front of it into an image
AI prompting uses a database from tons of stuff, photos included, to create an image
Photography is therefore more real life, as its direct primary source was real life light signal, than AI imagery which uses a digital database of hundreds of thousands of examples.
>>
File: bullet.jpg (43 KB, 399x501)
43 KB JPG
>>24832733
>photography isn't art
Try to take this pic, it defy physic's laws.
>>
>>24832745
AI = actual Indian
Who's gonna seethe the most when a clanker shits out masses of low effort, sometimes faulty code instead of H1-B tech immigrants?? I don't know, Saar
>>
>>24832774
>seeing is literally just reflections of light and your brain interpreting it.
ok and images generating from noise is what you do when you draw a picture
>>
>>24832779
kek
>>
>>24832764
This is actually correct though. I'm tired of adult art hos on their fucking tablets crying about aI. Paint on a canvass or go fuck yourself. It's all the same digislop.
>>
>>24832770
Oh shut the fuck up you pathetic pedant. You didn’t even really read my post you le read your le brain’s reinterpretation of le image durrr

Fucking navel gazing clown
>>
>>24832780
Sorry nigger, but AI literally cannot create without existing images. You lose tranny.
>>
>>24832770
Your eyes are cameras hooked up to your brain. You should calm down. Why are you so angry. What an embarassing sweaty reply
>>
>>24832783
>takes amazing photo
>"I made this"
imagine being this self-absorbed and retarded
>>
>>24832786
>greentext that doesn’t even sort of match the post
You are a pissy subhuman animal lashing out at your betters.
>>
>>24832764
>you didn't make that paint. You promted atoms to arrange themselves to reflect the desired wavelength of light
>>
>>24832730
Photography is the specialized artistic field of capturing still images with a camera. The camera is not the "aid". It is the entire platform itself from which art is created.
A clearer example is what's been happening to F1. The activity is enabled by a machine, but it is still the human factor that's critical in winning races. However teams are increasingly outsourcing every little bit of decision making to AI and increasingly eliminating the human factor.
Also OP is AIslop.

>>24832763
AI has many applications and has become critical in those work processes. Autonomous weapons, software development, anything that requires an inhuman amount of data processing. Billions of real dollars are being spent on the services that AI companies can provide, and they're producing real results. Which is very telling then how badly AI is failing to take over or really have much of an impact at all in the creative space. It just can't do it. This technology is not suited for creative tasks.
>>
File: selfmonk.jpg (51 KB, 459x612)
51 KB JPG
>>24832909
You could point a camera about at random taking pics with random settings and some of them would be good pics or you could give a camera to a monkey
>>
>>24832740
amogus is hella comfy



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.