AI is the most fun and creative thing we’ve had in a decade. If you are anti-AI you are either an NPC or some mediocre pencilslopper who’s angry you can’t charge exuberant prices for generic diaperfurry rule34 drawings anymore.
>>24874450Based clanker post.
>>24874450Nope. It's all primitive slop.
>>24874450AI is diffused plagiarism of moderated slop with passive aggressive guardrails. Just like your mom
>>24874450>AI is great for delusional trannies like meYes. We know. That's the fucking point, faggot.
>>24874450>If you don't like X, you are part of group Y, which you don't like, so you must like X.Keep banging your head on that wall. Maybe after a couple hundred thousand posts, you'll find someone's eight year old kid reading over their shoulder and convert them to your POV.
>>24874450based watatenposterhowever, i disagree
>>24874450your glorified search engine destroys creativity if anythingop is a faggot
>>24874457>glorified search engineYou used to be able to search "linux distributions exceed number of users" and get results. Now you get a scolding harpy telling you it isn't true. Not a search engine; a joyless fact checkmarker
>>24874456At this point, "based" just means "I'm a jewish faggot and so are you."
>>24874457Prove it. 99% of AI use is things which weren’t even being made before AI
>>24874460>people that weren't making things before are now making garbageIf we rephrase it for clarity it looks really fucking stupid. You're not actually this stupid, are you?
>>24874461>it looks stupid 5 years ago. Now it looks great.
>>24874462>not only do I not actually know what I said, I also don't know what you said
>>24874450Your also a lazy fag that outsourced your level7ng exp to AI like the US outdourced their manufacturing-capacity to China and is now sitting there bewildered to how it comes they cant do shit anymore.Shortcuts anon is not in your personal interest- Its for children who wants candy for breakfast every day and then complain about being fatsos
>>24874464Ops phone-phagging , co-worker wont like that
>>24874450I love AI for the photorealistic furries but I'm a mechanic so AI is not threatening to take my job any time soon. If I worked on a computer I'd hate AI. It's just like how I want the border closed but if I were born in Mexico I'd want it open. I don't know what else to call it other than human nature. You can't really blame people for that.
>>24874450AI is fun for lazy bastards (I am one), and gooners (I am also one).But we can take a step back surely and see why most people would find it annoying what with all the low effort slop out there flooding the internet, the misleading manipulation of dumb boomer voters, and the the resources it inordinately eats up so (mostly) thirdies can abuse free trials
AI is a tool like any other. The fact that it's a new tool just means there's a lit of retarded people using it for retarded things in a retarded way. There will inevitably come a day when AI is seamlessly integrated in every aspect of life and all the voices of opposition will be relegated to the scrapheap of history. Most people growing up after this era will not understand, or have an extremely simplistic understanding of, why the opposition existed at all.However, this opposition exists today as a necessary counterbalance preventing the current generation of retards from trying to implement AI in places it is not yet ready for or just categorically does not belong.
>>24874468I think your mässing the big point here and that is humies are inherently lazy and if you given rhem a way out of level7ng up - they will taket 99/100 Times. Humies are not leveled up enough to undedstand this yet and we will suffer generations of retards until "The Butlerian Jihad' inevitable cones.>First you marry - THEN you StatoilYou fucking retards
I mean it's alot cheaper to have AI make my custom fetish videos than paying human women to do it
>>24874450Based and true
>>24874468>there will come a day when all the proponents shut the fuck up and it's relegated to the boards that garbage belongs onFTFY.
>>24874470But the chase is better than the catch anon. Your just putting in a cheatcode inte the ggammaldags then you sit there bewildered to how it comes you dont enjoy it anymore after 30 minutes of playing it
>pro China board which is pro ai>hates Ai as a concept and not just closed source Ai, which making it open source will increase Ai usage4chan was mecca against snooty expert artists and pro plagiarism. What happened?
>>24874473>game even
>>24874450indian detected
>>24874469Some skills really do become obsolete with the advent if new technology. The printing press effectively replaced scribes with typesetters, for example. And typesetting died with the invention of the photocopy. There's little sense "leveling up" a skill like that aside from persinal enjoyment. What skills will AI will actually end up displacing, I am not arrogant enough to make any firm predictions.>>24874472You can persist in this delusional cope all you want. AI's influence is growing either way.
>>24874477One day you will figure out that power windows are worse than manual when the car is off.One day...
>>24874478You could extend this argument to literally anything that uses electricity. That does not make flat-out opposition to any if them warranted.
>>24874479>I don't understand that metaphors are not exclusively literalYes. Keep telling me you're stupid.
>>24874450You are just too low IQ to notice slop. Gonna suck when your job is eliminated.
>>24874450Man you interns are really getting whipped hard to come up with something to unpoison the zeitgeist, aren't you?
>>24874450Name one thing AI has improved for humans?and no, being able to gen your own porn doesn't count
>>24874483Functional equivalent: 3d model screenshots.
>>24874480I do understand abd demonstrated it by extending the logic of the metaphor. AI relies on a vast network of infrastructure to work. If any component of that infrastructure fails, the tool is no longer available. You likened this to power windows in a car when it's off. There's also the thinly veiled threat element I intentionally ignored as irrelevant.
AI genned porn is great if you have any kind of less common kink. People just keep treating the tech like it's somehow not just a coom-aid.
>>24874485>I extended the metaphor exclusively within the parameters to which I chose to constrain itYou understood nothing. I was talking about opportunity cost, fuckwit.
>>24874477Basic learning - the kids are becoming retsrded - This is bad no matter how convenient. Life is not convenient and neither is growing.If we outsource growing - We become oboslete
>>24874487Then your argument can be extended to more things which makes it even less valid. Now you can extend it to literally anything where doing more of one thing implies doing less of another. Unless you can actually provide a cost-benefit analysis of AI in particular then your argument has nothing to stand on.>>24874488There's a whole discussion to be had about how the economic system will adapt to these changes that I'd rather not speculate too much on. AI is still in its infancy.Your point about people using AI to cheat themselves out of learning is valid but the point I'm making is not an ethical one.
>>24874489Keep digging, you'll hit gold in the sand mine eventually.>What did it cost you?>Everything.Can you spell "brain damage?"
>>24874490Make a coherent point already. Posting cryptically does not make you clever, interesting, or intelligent. It's only purpose is to give yourself a smug sense of satisfaction when someone's interpretation of what you wrote does not match your intended meaning. You're communicating poorly and then blaming others for your own failures.What is "everything" in this context? What specific problems are you attributing to AI which you believe outweighs its utility?
