Should i bottom for some anon?
Nein, you should look for an emotionally vulnerable young man to send you pics of his torso and penis so you can turn him into your wife (male).
>>25039464Chicano?
Why are spics such fags
>>25039464groomer
no, you should better yourself and find a nice lady you can bottom for instead
>>25039537ChicaNO.>>25040653I'm literally too much of a megavirgin schizoid to make Discordfriends, let alone to groom someone into being my gf (male). I want OP to do it because I'm too afraid to do it myself.
>>25039442Are you the Brazilian Theodore?Anyways, do whatever you want. It's YOUR sexuality.
It turns out that the AI-generated blond boy wasn't Nordic-looking at all. He was a depigmented Congolese man.Brazilanon liked leucistic black boys all along.
>So where do I look like I'm from?>idk Europooristan, but you got the wrong color
>What ethnic group do you think I belong to?>Italian, but dipped in a vat of dark chocolate
>Che, vos pelotudo, ¿no sabés que la Argentina es blanca y que las Malvinas son argentinas? ¡Fuera con los boliguayos!
Please remind every single Brazilianposter that Hitler was obsessed with Jewish people and could only think of anything as either good or bad depending on whether he could think of them as Jewish.He thought Congoids and Hottentots were not dangerous unless they were controlled by the Jews.He thought Islam could be good if used against the Jews, and the establishment of the State of Israel would just unleash chaos in the Middle East.He thought both communism and interest rates were evil and degenerate specifically because they were associated with the Jews.Hitler never cared about South America or the Jim Crow South because they weren't somehow linked to the Jewish question.
Don't do any gay shit.Bad people try to set it up so you being nice is how it goes. Compliant. And like it's your idea and they are being gracious.Hate them.Fight hard. Kill if necessary. Go for the eyes etc. Smash their head against things. Regardless if they are being "nice" or not. It is not good or right to be raped.Flirting maybe fine. A group of fit people definately not. Don't be their victim. Don't make them more enthusiastic about raping other people.They are the homisexuals. Not you. Not till you're a rapist.It's not good stuff. Intervene if anyone else is threatened.Carry a weapon. Use it as a last resort. No restraints. No rape.Is it worth prison to hold a standard: Yes.But don't go to prison easily. Don't kill in camera. They don't care. Go out and see someone preyed upon. Elbow the bad guy in the head. There is a long way before needing to kill someone. Most bad guys are cowards that only attack what they are sure to win against. Good people don't fight back. You don't need to lose that but you do need to stop the wrong thing happening when it's in front of you. No matter how legal it is.
>>25041172encouraging op to do gay shit for attention is already borderline grooming and the rest is like actual grooming but by proxy.
>>25041889Me mon, have you become a victim of sexual abuse at the hands of a Sodomite or something of such sort?
>>25041899>do gay shit for attentionI wasn't saying he should do it for attention.I was saying it more for the sake of lifting up his self-esteem. A lotta men turn towards homosexual behavior because they feel more confident talking to men than to women, and I think if OP can find himself a guy who's even less confident than him, then he'll be able to finally play the role of a top and drop all fantasies about wanting to be dominated.
oops, that's not one of my threads. reply to me in this thread, oops, is dead, beaner got deceived >>25033961
>>25041931You will never be a Jew.
That's a new kind of aitosm
@BrazilanonIf this is not your thread, then you should have no reason to complain if I just bump it twice a day for the next week or so.
>>25041967NO, DON'T DO THIS PLEASE. DON'T BUMP THREADS ON PAGE 6,7,8,9,10,11. IF YOU BUMP I WILL SAGE YOU.
>>25041975Saging has exactly the same effect as not posting anything at all does. The only thing that does have any effect is to either post images (which move a thread closer to the image limit) or post without saging (which bumps a thread until it hits the bump limit).
Chicano was completely buckbroken by brazilianchads, it's unteal
>>25041993Non-general and non-cirno threads never achieve bum limit or image limit.
>>25041189>YAYY!!! Get AIDS because it’s YOUR choice and YOUR sexuality!!! WOOHOO AIDS
>>25041996Leiden declarationGuntherpostingHWNBAG
>>25041917this is not healthy behavior.'hurr durr just become prison gay and groom some poor retard into trooning out it'll help ur self esteem' great life advice mate xDtotally something that'll help everyone involved in the long run >>25041993he is pretending to not know what it does to get replies.I don't think ur understanding quite how desperate for attention this faggot is
>>25042060Slip?
>>25042060>just become prison gayOP is already regular gay and becomes gayer when people stop paying attention to him
>>25042060>become prison gayIs it really "prison" gay if you are free to visit brothels and pay for prostitutes?Regardless of how you try phrasing it, there is a genuine problem amongst men regarding trying to look for company and intimacy with other people. While prostitutes aren't exactly difficult to find or afford in many countries, making friends and eventually finding a couple is challenging for many people. You can say you're against grooming on principle, but can you think of a broad group of acts that you would acquiesce to?We know it is common for younger women to date older men, in many cases in a perfectly legal way (say, women in their mid-20's with men in their 50's or 60's), partly because they want a man who is very confident but is also capable of absorbing expenses such as meals at high-end restaurants and frequently purchasing jewellery. Similar phenomena may be observed involving young men and in some cases older women or older men.Even in the case of heterosexual couples with a small age gap, it is not uncommon for one member of the couple to either passively or actively encourage a certain habit, such as using a lot of skin treatments, makeup, consuming sugary drinks, alcohol, or marijuana, or downright abusing illegal substances.Now, this is not to say nothing is bad or everything should be permitted, but do you understand how easy it is to turn a blind eye on many things by focusing on a single negative aspect of human relations, and how dysfunctional contemporary society is?
>>25042060>>25042184To wrap it all up:Taking into account all of the dysfunctional aspects of contemporary society, the ever-increasing anomie and segmentation of society due to online social media and other such things, how is a person living in the year 2026 CE meant to look for a life partner and sustain a good, healthy relationship?I don't mean to say there must be a single, univocal closed answer to this, but clearly there must be something to be said in response to all criticism that can be made of interpersonal relations in our times.
>>25042067?>>25042129touche>>25042184prostitutes aren't any more healthy.the grooming thing is because u specifically told him to manipulate an emotionally vunerable person.if u just told him to go find a boywife or something I wouldn't have called u a groomer.>>25042236by going outside and talking to people maybe ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ I have had sex with quite a few ppl by doing this
>>25042326>by going outside and talking to people maybeI'm sure there are many people who can engage in smalltalk with the mailman or the owner of the neighborhood liquor shop who do not necessarily have a good love life.The problem for many people is not so much whether they can get a conversation started, but rather whether they can sustain a relationship that eventually blooms into a romantic one, and whether people can find a person who is adequate for them in most aspects. Casual sex is not too difficult for many men, especially the party-goer kind, but there is yet another set of challenges involved in going from merely having casual sex every now and then to finding a long-term couple who is, y'know, not mentally unstable, doesn't suffer from any strong addictions or harmful habits, and overall is not too strong or difficult to manage in terms of temperament.For many decades now, it's been common for couples to get married, last a few years together, have a child or two, and eventually get divorced. People in abusive or unhealthy relationships aren't too uncommon either. For every Penelope, it seems like there are many more Circes and Medeas.The problem is not whether it's possible take the first step, but rather to ensure that one won't end up in a relationship with a madman or a madwoman, or won't end up having a bitter split and a costly divorce.Merely suggesting vague advice may seem easy, but vague advice leads to unpredictable endings.
>>25042455>sustain a relationship that eventually blooms into a romantic oneyeah thats tricky for everyone tho.casual sex its easy to get however.I dont rlly see how anything ur saying last couple posts has anything to do with what I was saying unless ur trying to say 'grooming emotionally vunerable ppl into trooning out is ok because getting laid in a normal way is tricky'.I dont think thats what ur saying it seems you just needed an excuse to yap about how annoying the modern "market" for romantic partners is
>>25042606Well, it might sound like it is all unrelated and that it is a very long rant about a lot of stuff, but some of the main points are:>Age-gap relations are not necessarily uncommon, illegal, or frowned-upon>People with mental illnesses do not cease to be mentally ill the moment they find a partner>Many people prefer to look for relationships with people who are part of similar groups to them because establishing relationships with people outside those groups is difficultI am somewhat inclined to take back what I said before by saying grooming is a net negative, and that manipulating emotionally vulnerable people is exploitative. That being said, wording things in an inappropriate way would also lead me to sound like a hypocrite, or dishonest if I made it sound like emotionally vulnerable people cannot and should not be in romantic relationships.Therefore, what I do think can be said is that people who feel strongly inclined to be "bottoms" should be capable of experiencing being in the opposite position by feeling power over another person so as to allow them to judge based on experience whether they truly like only being in a submissive position.Also, please note that a lot of comments I say are just spur-of-the-moment thoughts rather than carefully planned statements, hence why I often tend to over-explain myself afterwards, so as to get others to know what I actually think about something.
>>25042756its not vunerable ppl being in relationships that's the issue here its the idea that random vunerable ppl should be coerced into trooning out.fucking with someones sense of identity untill they choose to present differently is inherently fucked up.you list a bunch of innocuous shit as if to say grooming ppl into becoming trans is no different when really its completely different.the whole idea behind the trans shit is to make peoples outward appearance match the way they see themselves so if you have to groom them into identifying differently first that isnt them being transgender that is them being exploited.I had a friend while in a vunerable state due to grief and drug use was targeted by some forcfem fetishits and groomed into trooning out who killed himself, maybe if you had first hand expirence with the consequences of this shit you would understand how fucking evil it is. I cant be arsed continuing this conversation, if you genuinely think that grooming ppl into doing depraved sexual shit that will in most cases lead to their suicide is in any way acceptable you are simply too fucked in the head to bother conversing with and you should consider killing youself before you harm others
>>25042953If you do not feel like you can continue this conversation, then by all means feel free not to respond any further.Nevertheless, the lesson I'll take from this conversation is not to become too invested in small points of contention, especially when they happen to stem from posts I wrote in half-joking manner just before going to bed around midnight (we are on 4chan after all, are we not?)
>>25042953To leave this on one final note:I do not think forcefem stuff is exceptionally evil because I know for a fact that there are many other type of behavior that people do that is just as harmful, like skin bleaching, transracial/looks-enhacing plastic surgeries, but also extreme diets (both anorexia and the kind of forcefeeding that West African men do to their wives). I do not like to traumadump, so I will just say in general that there are many people who suffered from identity and/or body image issues (like Michael Jackson or the self-hating Jewish Neo-Nazi Dan Burros) and who went to ridiculous lengths to "prove", or to "become" something that they were not born being.Plenty of plastic surgeons, aestheticians, and other people earn a living out of selling people the idea that their natural bodies are somehow wrong or fucked-up, and that by paying money they can become something they are not.The fact that Michael Jackson was addicted to both plastic surgery and painkillers, and ended up dying due to a painkiller overdose just tells me about how no amount of money or fame can stop people from eventually screwing up their own bodies. Michael Jackson's death might not matter to you, but for me it's still a very strong symbol of how people with body dysmorphia can end up.That is why I don't see gender dysphoria and pushing HRT on people as something uniquely evil, but rather as just a tiny part of a much, much greater social problem that has, to a great extent, become extremely banalized.
I hope you faggots are all bots
