What matters is not only where your genes come from, but also how dispersed they are. And I'd argue that the latter actually matters more than the former. I would be inclined to place an African man that has 95% of his genetics come from one area of his continent, over someone like Tim Robinson whose genetics are very heavily dispersed over Europe. To go as far to say as "He is more Black than Tim Robinson is White".Does this make sense to you?
It makes sense in terms of your internal logic
I have diverse British genetics and no pussy.Genetics is not all it's cracked up to be.
>>25164544this makes perfect sense.we cannot only apply standards to our own race we must apply them unilaterally to everyone.a purbreed oogabooga african tribesman is in many ways superior to a dysgenic mutt who has ancestors of 7 different races but that just all happen to be ones that have pale skin
yes and nothe problem is there isnt any hard culling scenario to make wide spread propagation of anyone's genetics worthwhileits just bacteria overgrowing to the point they consume all the resources and thus starvethats not really winning despite meeting the qualifications
