RIGHT?!
>>25331767Why would you need a camera in 2026?
>>25331768Feels good i guess. And the sensor is bigger than an iphone sensor so you get more detail on landscape shots
>>25331769>costs twice as much as your phone (which you already own)>have to carry around>makes shittier photos
>>25331767Yes an old Nikon. Makes slightly better pictures than most new phones. Why?
>>25331770It's quicker to get good photos on a phone but I feel pretty limited when I've tried to get a better level of control.I want a nicer camera but for my needs my Logitech Webcam does okay. I'd like to do more outdoors stuff and phones really suck for that when it's really bright or dark.
>>25331767yea
>>25331768Astrophotography.
>>25331771Cool. Which one?
>>25331774What's that
Cheap 300-1200 cameras are useless. You need at least 5000 camera + add items to it
>>25331777Before buying camera, check YouTube/photo website for best set up. Buying latest "best" camera is not a good decision. You need to know what expect before buying. 1. Making photos of randoms on street is a big no2. Hire models and sell photoshoots - stupid unless you're a model yourself
>>25331778Why would I even want to photograph other people?I only take pictures of myself and my catAnd why the hell would I want to make money doing photography? I have a real job
>>25331778With small cam you can make photos of people in public and they wont mind as much. Its the big cameras which make people nervous
>>25331767>>>/p/ my nigger. While I am sure your camera is very interesting to people interested in that sort of thing there is a dedicated board already. Cameras are not political.
>>25331770>makes shittier photosonly if you're a simpleton like yourself who doesnt know how to use it. a DSLR with the right lens is going to absolutely shit on a phone lens, you fucking retard.
>>25331770>costs twice as much as your phone (which you already own)those rx100s even brand new at launch are nowhere near as much as flagship phones. And they take much better videos and photos than cellphones do. All the processing in the world can't make up for an undersized sensor sitting behind dogshit glass. rx100s were fantastic cameras when they hit the market in the early 2010s and they're still great today if you aren't trying to lug a detachable lens DSLR or mirrorless around.
>>25331770Oh no they definitely take wayyyy better pictures. You're just a retarded third worlder who doesn't know any better
>>25331782>>25331783>>25331784iPhone 11 camera takes better pictures than your overpriced toy
>>25331767No, I’ll just keep my phone in my pocket and use that, 48 MP is good enough
>>25331768>Why would you need a camera in 2026?In the naive hope that y'all haven't put bombs in those yet.
>>25331776Putting a dslr camera on a telescope and making Fotos or vids from planets, or dso's (deep space objects) like nebulas, other galaxies, etc. I'm just starting with telescopes but this is like what want to do, it's a long way and sadly an expensive hobby.
>>25331788*fromof
>>25331788>>25331788>it's a long way and sadly an expensive hobby.Bro just rent a remote telescope by the hour. Its out in the fields where theres no light pollution and you can watch anything from your computer.
>>25331786Unironically your 48mp iphone makes less quality posters than this toy
Also, I never was captured by making photos with my smartphone. I just switch to 4ch immediately when anyone suspects me. Best my photos - random cute women, Muslim woman mast-d in metro, some girls on drugs.
>>25331767there's nothing worth photographing, anon
>>25331792Messed up and lost previous post.In short, I was captured when making photos with my small camera. People see camera in hands and immediately know what I do. Nothing really happened since I'm huge guy, but still.
Why is there a jew flag in every thread asking hyper retard nigger questions?
>>25331776You can remove the eyepiece from a reflector telescope and take the lens off the camera, then use the telescope as the camera lens. I like to take pictures of the moon. Picrel somewhat.
>>25331791I don’t care, it’s good enough and is usually on me. I’m a guy I don’t walk around taking pictures
>>25331767Why only one?
Yes, I bought some random Samsung NX1000 back in 2014 when I saw it going for cheap.That thing still mogs the absolute shit out of my Sony Xperia 5.Goes to show the importance of sensor sizes.
>>25331799Woww, that think looks greatYupp, its not all about mp, its about lenses and sensor size too
>1300D>90D>Zf>5D MkIvI have way too many cameras.Anyone noticed that if you try to take pictures of lefty protests they're the first ones to demand your "press credentials" and if you tell them to do one they start trying to block you and in some cases try to "confiscate" your camera?
>>25331785You haven't established that and all the posts you're replying to dunked on you with arguments. Eego, your post is getting dismissed and you have convinced nobody.
>>25331799I'm generally not much a fan of most mirrorless cameras but the one thing I'm always jealous of is their miniscule sensor to flange measurements. You can adapt damn near any lens ever made to those things for dollars with a cheap ass aluminum mount adapter.
>>25331802This photo was taken on a DSLR
>>25331767>uses a snoyI've gotten back into film photography lately, picrel
>>25331804Why is everything so blurry in Romania?Is it the poverty?
>>25331767Got a canon 800D/T7i with sigma 17-55mm 2.8f and 70-300mm sigma macro dl super.and a sony ax fdr33 4k camcorderkinda annoying to walk around with but it does make nice photos and allows long distance zoom. why do we need a dedicated camera? is it another psyop with smartphones?
>>25331767I knead one for work.
>>25331767well what's a cheap as shit compact camera that still makes nice pictures
I've got this bad boy but the kit lens is not that good. What should I get for landscapes and family pictures without breaking the budget?
>>25331768So Mossad can't call the Pentagon and have pictures you took of their dastardly doings remotely wiped.
>>25331809What is that creature?
>>25331804Taken on a smartphone So bad
>>25331767yes, because it's not made by whites. anything made by whites is trash
Yeah but it isn't trash made by SONY wtf
>>25331812it's a pig i photographed with a cheap 2000s compact camera
>>25331810Cool one. No idea which lense, im merely larping as a photgrapher
>>25331790Hmm no that's nothing I want. I could by a dwarf 3 or any other smart telescope or rent, like you say, a remote one but the "I watch it on my phone" isn't the experience I search for. I want to learn where everything is. Star/sign maps help a lot. The experience to search and watch with your own eyes is important. Or how to calibrate your telescope, using different oculars, following fast moving objects without a motor (goto) to have them in focus, clear silent nights outdoors, etc. All of that.
>>25331767i do old one, but does the job
>>25331819Woww, that one looks vintage. Great camera
Things pop out and stuff
>>25331809No idea. I think the better and cheaper option are entry level dslr’s
>>25331816It's a cool animal.
>>25331808Which one? Nice horse ofcourse
>>25331824Horse scientist. Need to put them against the wall to show the conformation and track their growth to show how nice we made them for breeding goals.
>>25331825That horse has seen some shit man.
>>253318261000 cock stare
>>25331826
>>25331828Beautiful animals
>>25331829I'm just glad they're real.
>>25331830That horse needs to stop licking toads.
>>25331831
>>25331788you wont record and post the moon spaceships so wgafrecording the macro is no different than recording the micro and i dont own thatt type of scope eitherbut i imagine one is useful for you when you want to piss or fap
>>25331811This
>>25331767based sony RX100 appreciator
>>25331788>>25331796You can really do that ?
>>25331796Also beautiful picture
>>25331799looks like a korean answer to the hasselblad meme-cameras (which are sony) lol
here's the nazi variant for OP's camera
>>25331767i used to have a dslr. i want to buy a sony mirrorless but the used price is still like 80% of new so i just use my smart foam.
>>25331810Look for an old Minolta 50mm 1.4.If you're really keen you can get an old radioactive rokkor 58mm f1.2, ihave one for my a7, the bokeh is amazing.
>>>/p/
>>25331767I have his one with 30x zoom.It take a lot of time to focus when videoing on 4k
>>25331843Nice. Which year is it
>>25331843I've got one of those in a drawer somewhere. They're ok.
>>25331767>not having a Canon AE-1 with Soviet glass
Yes. It takes much better photos than a new iPhone, even though its 15 years old. Any random DSLR will make nicer photos. It won’t have built in AI you can’t turn off. Taking pictures of my legos, the DSLR is clearly superior to a phone camera even the new ones. It has less noise and bigger lens.
Yes, it's the best way to take photos. Phone cameras are still shit, and today they're actually worse than 10 years ago because the image processing code has been jeeted. I'm kind of worried cameras will get jeeted too eventually.
>>25331767Is a Japanese d7000 worth it for around 120 usd? Or is it too old and better to go with something more modern?
>>25331841Thank you
>>25331768>>25331770the cheapest sony mirrorless camera takes way better photos than the latest iphone pro that costs twice as much
>>25331848>absolute shit dynamic range>endless meme processing and filtering>shit pixel density proof in phone camera quality is in taking a picture in a forest, every highlight is absolute shit, all detail is lost in leaves
More camera posters on /pol/ than on /p/Lel
>>25331849No idea. How old is it?
>>25331843>take sensor from sony, body design from square era nikon, lens from leica, slap lumix on itbased panasonic, had one of their older models, also with leica, was a tank lol
>>25331851What is sovietglass? Is it a good camera?
>>25331767Yes, but it's still digital because i have no space to develop photos. Takes much nicer pics than tablet though.
>>25331857asked the wrong poster there bud, but soviet glass is just soviet lenses, vintage and full of character, very cheap too
>>25331835They’re cool but if i could choose now i would buy a full frame camera.I just want the most resolution for mountains and stuff
>>25331859Why dont you show the camera, it would add to the greatness of this thread.I like older stuff too
>>25331860>mountains>full frameu need a 6x6 then (I dunno if they make 6x9 digitals, haven't been up to date)with current tech APS-C and quarter inch are barely distinguishable at low ISO
Look at this retard >>25331768KYS kike
>>25331853Yes forests with leafs and beaches with sand or rocky beaches. They look crap on phones
>>25331861because the gooknigger blocked my entire ip range from image posting, probably some faggot on this ip beforeit's fucking shit because i wanna post images to /wg/ like i used tolook up the mir 1v, mir 20m, helios 44-2, i adapt those onto my digital sony as well, great funbut i mostly shoot 35mm film on my canon ae-1, also got some canon FD lenses for that
>>25331862What is a good upgrade for this sony to another for nature photography and mountains? I just want to have copyshops print posters for me to hang in the home, but they have to be good detail
>>25331865Whoops. Germans did create everything ever, didnt they, everything else is just a bad copy
>>25331866well the full frame is the Sony Alpha series, you need to look into which one is best for still photographyunless you are wealthy and you can buy a 6x6 digital back for a hasselblad or smth
>>25331866>I just want to have copyshops print posters for me to hang in the homea full frame is more ideal for the bigger image, you'd be fine with it, the more important thing is the glass you get to capture good enough detail for prints, the camera sensor itself will be fine for some posters
>>25331865>>25331867that was the soviet equivalent of the nikon 50mm f/1.8 lens which was a must-have top quality lens for like $100 (or $150 new)the problem with soviet lenses is that they have primitive coatings (if any) so you can only shoot black and white... had a 70-300 soviet glass that if you zoomed to 300 turned into a psychedelic blue-pink wonderland lol
>>25331868>>25331869Sony full frames are so fucking expensive. Why are cams so expensive and lenses too. Its crazy
Yes. I have a hasselblad 500 c/m (heavy!), a vitessa t (unreliable), nikon f, nikon fm 10, yashica something tlr, a cheap german thing with a plastic lens that shoots 6 x 9 cm frames, and a digital sony from maybe 2006
>>25331767Photography is gay
>>25331871>Sony full frames are so fucking expensive. Whybecause there is no alternativethe irony is that sony is a great sensor and a shit camera with horrific ergonomy... practically just a box to hold the lens and sensor and battery together lol
>>25331871noob
>>25331875Whoopsie. The pro stuff is just for the pedo elite only
no, why would I need one? I'm not a photographer and my phone takes good enough photos. What do you autists take pics of? Trees on your lonely incel walks?
>>25331877HATESPEECH!
>>25331876if u'r going to jail for taking a pic of that loli in love with u, it might as well be the best pic possible(totally not a hasselblad marketing slogan)
>>25331879What cams would you use to record urban exploring and stuff? What are good ones?
>>25331871if you're shooting landscapes only you could make do with even an a72 or 3, you don't need the latest hybrid for landscapes
>>25331768>Why would you need a camera in 2026?What if a Squatch abruptly shows up to raid your trash, and then walks back into the woods in a way No Human Could Walk With That Gait?!
>>25331880depends... some years ago I would have said Ricoh GR IV but the 28mm is not a good angle, you'd want a 24mm (like OP's Sony on short end) or just go for 35mm (like some Fuji have)ideally you should just have a SLR like Nikon Z9 (as expensive as the Sony Alpha... uses same sensor too lol) and Nikon lensesNikon was made for hunting stuff, like wildlife, and nature photos... that's a good startCanon is more of a "studio photography" mindset
one day I want to try making a pinhole camera and make some cursed photos
