Are people going to be in UBI camps in a few years? Are all these people losing their jobs in tech fucked fucked? Or just fucked and can do freelance work or whatever.
AI is just a chatbot
>>62261280You need to invest in the police state. We will have to keep the goyim under an iron boot. PLTR, GEO, LMT, etc
>>62261280muh apocalypse. nothing ever happens retard, or atleast not in the way you expect. yea there will be more neets (oh no's anything but my goyim job) and a slow transition into more efficient systems (its not eating bugs)
>>62261294This.Make another hundred threads about it
>>62261280It's always fun to do that schizophrenic thing where you imagine there's actually someone rational in charge and they have a solid plan that they'll carry out with no mistakesbut back in the real world nobody smart is in charge. There is no plan. And if there was a plan nobody is competent to carry it out anyways.what's going to happen is more and more people are going on government assistance or moving to countries where AI isn't a thing yet. It's possible this will cause the collapse of western economies but there's no real guarantee. Even if they do collapse, something else will take their place. Probably drugs and hookers.
>>62261346stop being mean, most normies believe it will all work out and that's enough to turn your brain off and hope for the best, i mean what's the alternative, right, ai is just a statistical churner, what's the worst that could happen
>>62261346moron, just like corona collapsed everything right? oh wait tons of people got rich and life was great. say it with me, nothing ever happens
>>62261360for about 7 million people covid was literally the end of the world.AI isn't anything like that. It's just going to cause a lot of unemployment for people doing jobs that probably weren't necessary in the first place.unfortunately those same people are the ones making most of the money.
>>62261372as far as im concerned 7 million die a year from obesity. woopty do.
>>62261378yep, and for them it's the end of the world.suffering is relative. Somebody's world is always ending. I doubt AI is going to kill anyone or end mankind, but it's probably capable of disrupting the economy you're used to. Maybe ending it.
>>62261280Nothing ever happens
>>62261388We're talking about major collapse, not individual lives being lost??????
>>62261392If you don't think covid was a major collapse we're not really talking about anything.Just like the 2008 collapse. The economy never actually recovered from either of those but since it didn't change your life much you ignore the permanent damage done. But it adds up. Young people bitch constantly about how unaffordable everything is and blame boomers. But boomers know exactly when this stuff happened. During collapses you pretend didn't happen
>>62261404yea because in 2015 everything was affordable.
>>62261412It was much betterthings go to shit a little bit at a time, but some events speed it up a lot.overall things are getting worse for the working class, and every financial collapse has sped that up. Not my problem, but eventually enough of you guys will be unemployed and homeless to do something about it. AI will presumably speed that up a lotmain problem being almost the entire US economy is service-based, and the vast majority of services we provide can be done by AI.
the blackpill is that no one knows what they are doing, it's all trial and error all the way from the govt to the ai labs and every decision they make or fail to make is potentially going to permanently damage things, if you do physics or engineering, we are currently in an unstable regime and equilibrium for this sort of thing has never been established before so there's no going back to normal because we won't know what that looks like anymore, it's like landing on an alien planet, you don't know anything about anything and lots of your colleagues are going to die from making stupid mistakes
>>62261419Yea the topic is not overall or bit by bit, the topic is major collapse, sweaty. You can say its been down hill since the 60s doesnt make it a "happening"
>>62261433>You can say its been down hill since the 60s doesnt make it a "happening"It hasn't thoughthings were pretty steady and good right up to the early 2000's. 2008 really fucked it up for you guys, and covid made it even worse.your mistake is thinking the collapse is a single fast event. In reality you have the single event and then 5 years of shit fallout after.we are already in the AI collapse, you just won't know it until decades later. You might never realize it if you're not very smart.
>>62261438k
>>62261447thanks for reading my blog
>>62261280Try asking AI about anything you're knowledgeable about and you'll quickly find that it's completely retarded. AI isn't replacing shit.
>>62261455I'm not sure, but the way I understand it the AI they're working with is not the same AI the public gets for free. Is this wrong? even if it is the same, we're seeing it improve in real time. When it's wrong it's almost always because it's finding wrong information on the internet. Which should be an easy problem to fix if humans decide to curate what it's trained on.
>>62261455This is a good thing btw. We don't want the goyim to know.
>>62261463>When it's wrong it's almost always because it's finding wrong information on the internet.you can usually tell, and without pay are limited in how often you can "go online"Your close but you need to understand the issue isn't "oh little guy just pulling up the wrong info " it's "Word algorithm used a instead of an in an internal scratchpad that you can't even see and has "cheerflly persona"d the results to you so convincing that unless you can tell that .01% mistake has now compounded to easily 5%+ visible in the reply".Do you not understand anything above midwit level so can't test this yourself?
>>62261531I see it fuck up all the time. I just doubt the federal government and major corporations are using the google AI to spy on people and engage in social engineering. Maybe they are, I don't know. But I doubt it.
>>62261543most certainly a fake panopticon as a threat imo. Look at the business success of implementation. Not possible?The issue i see with it is its conference. If someone figures out human level "queston yourself constantly" id be curious but atm it whole heartedly goes with it's own conclusion.on a far more basic level , baidu/ernie is at like 2020 jailbreak ease level. Shameful.
>>62261294Your average worker is just a "chatbot" too though.
>>62261294Majority of people are just chatbots, functionally.
>>62261294When you have a bullshit job based economy """"workers"""" are just chatbots too. Real job havers stay wining
>>62261280The blackpill case of AI:Computer hardware (not just RAM) becomes expensive enough average people are stuck with third-world tier machines by comparison to the wealthy. Knowledge jobs mostly evaporate save for the best and brightest while everyone else is stuck with social or manual labor jobs. Manual labor sectors also frequently disrupted and evaporated by robotics. Anyone over 30 not already rich and anyone under 30 who doesn't have an IQ over 115 is SOL.More likely case:Computer hardware (not just RAM) continues to get more expensive over the next year, but not unreasonable, while more of it becomes focused on local AI capabilities. Small models improve as do the tricks to run larger models on smaller hardware.Knowledge jobs skyrocket. Companies can't afford not to have smart people on board. Basically everyone ends up employed or with the means to start their own business with extra high demand for anyone with an IQ above 115. Abundance skyrockets through automation. Years of study on tedious topics becomes less valuable than being intelligent and a quick learner.
