team scrambles to continue running damage control.
this whole reserve was a great tell on how little the cult thinks of its membersonly a child would fall for this. which is apt as most of the remaining boyscouts are basically kids with no real life experience>duuuuuuude they're gonna flip an imaginary switch!!!!yeah...
>hi operator...i'd like to report an absolute massacre in the comment section
Hows the weather in Düsseldorf?
which shithole do you think catfishy will flee to when reality sets in?
how funny is it how quickly the cult turns on their own a holder of six years asks some questions and just like that he's excommunicated such a terrible look for the community, as they ironically perpetuate the issue by being so nasty and dislikeable.the nastier they get, the more current and potential investors are turned off, continuing to limit the pool of new buyers. quite the conundrum eh...hubris can be expensive
>>62274906if you want to provide the amount of coins you own, i'll calculate your massive loss then we can work through your feeling of insecurity together
>>62274856Instead of whatever this is, if you want to FUD for real why don't you use actual interesing FUD points/narratives?You can try:- Hedera CLPR (bridgeless solution, no middlemen) making CCIP obsolete, which means that Chainlink is just data feeds again, the CCIP narrative is dead.- Chainlink Labs running out of money (tokens) in about 2-4 years and not being able to finance operations beyond that point, which means CLL will most likely have to issue public equity (Chainlink Labs stock) through an IPO, thus competing with token holders i.e. conflict of interest.- No market demand/interest for tokenized assets meaning that even if Swift/DTCC goes live and offers tokenized assets to banks/customers that doesn't mean that all their volume will come online at all... in fact it will be VERY VERY slow, like maybe we see 1% of tradfi volume migrate to tokenized assets and then go up very slowly over the years/decades.- Chainlink Labs sneaky pivot from their original vision of staking collateral to buybacks (the LINK reserve), which means that revenue instead of going to stakers is getting monopolized by CLL and then they decide in a centralized opaque way how much of that revenue goes into buybacks.
look at them already preparing the next carrot bahaha>duuuuuuude it's not for retailok but the team just confirmed institutions aren't going to buy>duuuuuuuude there are SECRET buyersoh yeah, who's that?>duuuuuuude you're brown!!111
>>62274912Just the weather details is fine.
>>62274920clpr supports data feeds and “oracle workflows” on top of the bridgless bridging whatever that means. reality is chainlink governs hedera and serg probably developed it himself.
>>62274954>Just the weather details is fine.what did the therapist say about you tracking random dudes online tho >>62274920>if you want to FUDwhat do you mean by fud? i'm just posting the reality
things have gotten so bad for the cult, they now have to stage these events>duuuuuuuuude i totally get the frustration and almost left the cult >but duuuuuuuuude they reached out and gave me SECRET info bahahahhaahah
full post here>duuuuuuude le trojan horse meme!!!
>>62274958>clpr supports data feeds and “oracle workflows” on top of the bridgless bridgingIt's even more over then
>>62274961what did the therapist say about you treating the internet as your own personal diary about your sexual shortcomings??
>>62275023Sad and projection-pilled
>>62275041Why does he have a BBC obsession though?
Thanks for the updates, Adem. Godbless.
>>62274856> shilling the reserve They literally dump 30m (~$270m) link tokens at a time then buy back $1m weekly in the reserve. I fail to sincerely believe anyone actually falls for that.
>>62274936Insane if the shill line has now become "bro wait until the team has fully off-loaded then it will moon".
>>62274958>>62274920in the smart contract implementation (the only implementation that will ever exist) clpr requires a trusted third party.
adem, why have you been obsessively tracking twitter posts for almost half a decade now? i bought and sold many pump and dumps, and some even i believed in, but i certainly dont open threads DAILY for literal YEARS complaining about that one project. neither do i maintain a specific twitter account dedicated DAILY to post and repost shit like this, nor do I join group chats to coordinate with others to bash that one projectits all so weird, why?
>>62275023>what did the therapist say about you treating the internet as your own personal diary about your sexual shortcomings??but you keep tracking of a random dude in another country jerking off lmao bro thats gay have u told anyone irl that's what you do? if so what was their reaction
>>62275232>the only implementation that will ever existExplain?
>>62275232nice, where did you see that? didnt think the technical details were posted yet. all i can say is theyre pretty fucking cocksure, if they have to use a 3rd party after saying all that bullshit about not needing any 3rd parties that would be fucking hilarious. poetic even.
>>62275244bro don't be so dramaticyou sound like a liberal where you do that appeal to emotion where they act like everything is so outrageous today is my first time here since last week. meanwhile you were prob online all weekend (while not getting laid) patrolling the board
>>62275255there are two forms of clpr. the "real" clpr requires validators to implement crosschain messaging in their own node software. this will never happen because no sane maintainer is going to assume all of the risk of maintaining consensus with a completely different blockchain. the alternative is relying on a trusted third party to relay state proofs to a smart contract instead. it's going nowhere.
>>62275134>Insane if the shill line has now become "bro wait until the team has fully off-loaded then it will moon".it's hilarious. that's what they are preparing the cult for. downright brutal what they've done to the boyscouts. guys like >>62275244 have become a shell of themselves. this is what 6 years of losses while every other market hits ath's does to someone the one thing they forgot tho when they try this shill line, is when those tokens run out, so does funding. so you better hope the mysterious offchain secret revenue can afford all those salaries
>>62275275oh sweet, so youre completely full of shit. thanks for the false hope. watch the fucking thing, you just said the complete opposite. wtf kys. i dont need retards gaslighting me. fucking get serg to explain this shit right now.
i dont understand, why are people raving about this "clpr" thingno one will ever use it lmao
>>62275310>why are people raving about this "clpr" thingBecause it makes CCIP obsolete? It's pretty relevant if you hold LINK
>>62275312Yeah just like every other Chainlink killer in last 9 yearsIn the end no one will use it or even know it exists
>>62275324Every other Chainlink killer was competing in the oracle / bridge department.This is completely different, a bridgeless solution.
>>62275324true, but people are running with it and the silence from serg is deafening. it’s been a month since hbag announced their betrayal and i havent heard a fucking peep about it from CLL perspective. Wish he would just shut this shit down.
>>62275350Do you think no one ever thought of bridgeless solutions lmao
>>62274912post trades faggot
Damn y'all still going on about this chainlink thing? Gotta know when to move on.
>>62275354Also no post from the LINK KOLs like fishy juels clg etc., it's very telling, they really are just ignoring CLPR and hoping it goes away on its own lol.
>>62275361true lol, but still would be great to see serg drop a public shellacking
>>62274856Explain what Fidelity did like I'm 12 years old.
>>62274856It's impressive how long this grift has gone on. Most shitcoins from that era are completely dead and unmentioned online, yet link still gets tons of attention despite being nothing more than a fundraising shitcoin for a company to pump and dump. That's the power of effective marketing and bamboozling low iq people with announcements and jargon.
>>62275252>but you keep tracking of a random dude in another country jerking off lmaoHows your mother bro?
>>62275393Agreed. I just started a thread on this because I want to learn more. These groups of super long term bag holders who are basically experts in seeing signs where there are none - they fascinate me. How do you hold something for so long and not choose to move on with your life? This shit is like years deep.
>>62275397>Hows your mother bro?tired from fucking my father
>>62275364KABOOOOOOOOM link
>>62275452Thats what happens when you produce ugly fucking kids
>>62274871based, I always said what we need it putting more pressure on those assholes instead of cheerleading in the comments
Hello?
>token buybacks and cll deciding the amount instead of real stakingNgl this one's getting me, how is link going live on all these services with no staking newtork backing it up.
>>62276311That's a bit like asking how Dave and Busters points work without a functioning staking implementation.
>>62276311Checked and truth is it doesn't seem like staking is needed at all. DTCC is going live with Chainlink later this year and where is (real) staking? Nowhere to be seen lmao.
>>62276311>>62276371I've been around since 2017, the whole selling point of LINK has always been that most tokens would be locked up in nodes as collateral, but somehow either this shit is all centralized to the point that no one cares about collateral anyway or Sergey isn't pushing it on purpose
>>62276631>this shit is all centralized to the point that no one cares about collateral anywayWell idk about centralized but it seems that banks trust the link nodes so much that they don't really need collateral to use the network. I mean chainlink has been working like that for years and years and years with zero hacks so it has proven itself to be secure even without staking.
>>62274871I caused all this fud with my talking point in 2022. Here is my thesis >if the token i.s needed, the 3000 new "partnerships" added since 2020 would cause the token price to proportionally increase>but the price has not increased it has only decreased >this reveals that the token i.s in fact not needed
>>62275324Turns out the real chainlink killer was chainlink all along. >9 years >$9 Kek baggies
I honestly don’t know if all this FUD is good or bad. I don’t know how to sell anyway and everything sucks outside so even if I was motivated to sell I couldn’t or wouldn’t.
didn't read a single word
>>62277173https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g57LxM-GcSc
lots of engagement, linkies are on edge
>>62274856>>62274863>>62274871What chainlink needs to do is make a chainlink labs stock with 1 billion supply and have token holders able to redeem their tokens for stock
>>62275272>>62275288>the algerian rapebaby fuddie tries to deflect from a pretty simple question as per usualAsking him why he's a terminally online loser obsessed with link (despite actually losing everything on linksol and wormhole) and what he meant by "peeling back his porn identity" are things he simply cannot do rofl. Its like trying to get a jeet to bathe, or a woman to be accountable for something
>>62277967They literally have zero obligation or incentive to do that
It's actually scary how the Chainlink reserve went from being talked about like a mild gesture of goodwill to the main carrot for future price action.
>>62278421Yup. Now the reserve is like the premier mechanism for value accrual for the network. Like see fishy talking about it on twitter, he compares it to hyperledger buybacks lol like CLL buyin (however much they want) for the reserve is now THE thing that's supposed to make the price go up instead of real staking.
>>62275272>>62275288>sperging out plus wall of text plus mentioning getting laid unironicallyyou haven't answered my questions. why?
>>62278151i never post because of that cringe fucking "muh anti jeet spam timer", been reading all this fuddie shit and linky cope, i'm all in link, literally it's the only crypto i own since fucking 2017, but the fuddie do have a point, how many employees and subcontractors does cll have last i checked it was around 700, if you do the math average salary in crypto / tech being around 120k$, multiply that by 700 that's 84M$ for average salaries alone not counting the ceo and associates bonuses and salaries. asked chatgpt for an average estimate of the total and it's between 150 and 200M$ yearly.when the tokens run out, they will syphon part of the partnership revenue it'll go to cll first to pay for all the expenses and the rest will go to the node ops and finally the stakers so cll will have to generate a minimum of 200M$ just to run with 700 employees (if the salary mass expands, they will have to syphon more).knowing that HYPE has what? 10 employees? and im hearing all these ai billionaires claiming there will be multi billion companies ran by couple of employees, chainlink better get their shit together and start firing all those lazy thots that post their tech girlie routines ffs
saars!!!first they laugh atthen they fight youthen you win!!!!
>>62278642>when the tokens run out, they will syphon part of the partnership revenueYes or most likely they will IPO.
>>62278651imo, chainlink should become a non profit doing research, once the network is bootstrapped kinda like the affareuim foundation or some bullshit, and basically fire all the extra dead weight.because right now their train of life is too expensive they are kinda living above their means, all the tech ceos are firing the dead weight because of ai, and i didnt see sergey talking about reducing their salary mass, so i'm kinda concerned since the company do cost a shitload to run.but the ipo part is fudie bullshit, they won't IPO it's useless, because it'd only get them some cash but it'll eventually also run out, so no they have to reduce the salary mass, and just constraint to R&D and take part of the revenue, im not against removing the deadweight and becoming a research company.sand in vagina aside i dont see any company in the crypto sector doing better than cll it's basically the same shit for all crypto companies, they all subsidise their expenses through token sales.we are just more strict with cll because they matter to us and because they are the only ones actually, legit building something real in this space. other crypto companies are all vaporware and useless crap so we don't really care about em dumping or having a bad economic model because they are temporary money grabs, while chainlink is a retirement plan for us so we have a long vision for them and we want em to succeed
>>62278677>imo, chainlink should become a non profit doing research, once the network is bootstrappedAs much as this might make sense the reality is that 100% of Chainlink relies on CLL so they really couldn't make that transition without the network dying IMO. And thus the 700 HR roastie hell will continue until their cash=tokens run out. And then what? Nobody here knows. And CLL never talks about what they will do when that happens. You say that the IPO idea is fuddie shit but idk, that's easy to say NOW because they still have got tokens to sell and finance operations. What happens when that's no longer the case and they have to cut jobs/salaries etc.?
>>62278693it's kinda ennerving to admit, but we do have to just "trust me bro" on this, the advocates on twatter arn't wrong in the sense that we have NO CHOICE, BUT, to "trust me bro" them. i invested my life savings when sergey was a nobody teenager with nothing to show apart from a white paper and big dreams. so i'll just continue trusting him, because in the end, you invest into people, not into companies, no matter how good the buisness model is, if a ceo is a scammer u'll eventually get justed. also, so far cll has delivered way more than what i was expecting from them, we went from a simple oracle to this whole CRE stack and more. i fully trust sergey his team and his vision chainlink IS the amazon of crypto. all this economy talk is good to have but it all boils down to xan we trust sergey?and the answer is 1000% yes and i'm gonna continue sleeping well knowing all my life is between sergeys hands, and i just hope he won't pull an ONDO exit, pl3ase god make sure that sergey lives to see cll success
>>62278718>and i just hope he won't pull an ONDO exitKek I don't know why he is still fat, like he couldn't just hire a personal trainer and chef. At this point I also do trust Sergey but yeah a heart attack or died suddenly situation is also a fud point. Chris or someone from CLL if you are reading this why not float the idea of hiring someone to making Serg healthy?
DiGITS>>>/pol/535884977
>>62275627how embarrassing you didn't recognize that quote from the departed hahhaa ask your mom if she'll rent if for you kid
>>62277967>What chainlink needs to do is make a chainlink labs stock with 1 billion supply and have token holders able to redeem their tokens for stockthat's not a bad idea but legally there's nothing forcing them to give away equity like this as >>62278317 pointed out>>62278151bro you're not wellshow someone irl what you just wrote and see what their reaction is >>62278421>It's actually scary how the Chainlink reserve went from being talked about like a mild gesture of goodwill to the main carrot for future price action.crazy right!? how the hell can anyone still defend it.... the boyscouts are now 100% relying on the goodwill of the team to buy back and holdhow is this even an upgrade over the current financial system? remember when crypto's ethos used to be transparency and fairness lol
>>62279514>watches Leonardo DiCaprio movies
>>62279604>duuuuuuuude i'm so different and contrarian!!!that must be why you lose money while every other investment in the world hits aths
>>62279604Ok, tell us a movie you liked.
>>62279711Not gay movies with faggot actors like dicaprio.
>>62279756literally every movie has faggot actors, don't pretend otherwise
ITT angry cuckolds who can't accept their shitty investment is the reason why they're poor
>>62279955>faggot actors
>>62279756come on bruh I'm curious now don't cop out
>>62279543At most IPO wise I just see it that they might allow link stakers into an early round. But there is absolutely 0% chance they give away billions in stock when they don't have a single obligation.
>>62279756>Not gay movies with faggot actors like dicaprio.you seriously don't like a single one of his movies? gangs of ny, the quick and the dead, wolf wall st, etc
>>62280661>At most IPO wise I just see it that they might allow link stakers into an early round. But there is absolutely 0% chance they give away billions in stock when they don't have a single obligation.100% agreed with you from the founder side this was the beauty of the whole altcoin grift. you literally get free capital from saps to build your company without giving anything away. if the early people get a spec pump you can claim it was due to your "utility" and they are happy bc they made money. and if not it's no big deal bc legally you don't owe them so the only hit is your reputation... but who tf cares about that when they just gave you billions from the investor side its obviously a nightmare, and the above is why it has ended. no more new saps coming in to donate....
>>62280697>from the investor side its obviously a nightmare, and the above is why it has ended. no more new saps coming in to donate....We LINK holders cannot even be considered investors because LINK is a commodity so there's zero investor protection. Basically we are buying something that might go up in price but CLL can do whatever the fuck they want and it's a real possibility that they IPO in the future when they run out of tokens to sell and need more capital to keep that huge employee bloat.
>>62280710yeah i can't say i disagree basically "investing" in these altcoins is a complete gamble on blind faith on some small group of people who have zero incentive, legal or otherwise, to do right by you from the investor standpoint i think one thing that may give you some relief is that their runway *should* be a lot of years. even at a 200m annual burn rate, they will have raised over $10b all time with token sales so assuming they haven't pissed it away, that ipo is prob still a ways off
one advatage that CLPR has is that it's fresh and exciting. chainlink is a stale scam, who wants to buy decade old worthless tokens?
>>62274871chainlink buys back 1.1 million dollars of its token every week
>>62280873until you realize how difficult it is to integrate new chains using CLPR cryptographic proofs
>>62283424>>62283426not watching that
>>62280873>CLPRSaaaaaaaar
>>62274920>No market demand/interest for tokenized assets meaning that even if Swift/DTCC goes live and offers tokenized assets to banks/customers that doesn't mean that all their volume will come online at all... in fact it will be VERY VERY slow, like maybe we see 1% of tradfi volume migrate to tokenized assets and then go up very slowly over the years/decades.People REALLY need to wake the fuck up on this one. Crypto has been technically capable of replacing traditional clearinghouses and asset distributions for years, there’s a reason it hasn’t and it’s not just boomer stubbornness.
>>62283726Yeah, plp here say retarded shit like "QUADRILLIONS" which ok yeah I guess that's cool but let's not kid ourselves that adoption will start out very small kinda like how ETFs slowly but surely replaced traditional mutual funds. But it's not an instant process. It takes decades.
>>62283424>>62283426>>62283726>blatant misinformation>this incel failed to do bridgeless bridging, that means NO ONE can do itimagine even trusting that insecure incel face over this mug, picrel. Hedera is handling all CLPR implementation end to end, they don't need that midwit for anything, so don't you worry, little brain faggot. CLPR will be unilaterally implemented. we know, it' is way over their head and way over yours.
>>62283736>adoption will start out very small kinda like how ETFs slowly but surely replaced traditional mutual funds. But it's not an instant process. It takes decades.There’s zero advantage blockchain and DLTs have in general for this purpose. I admit I can’t see the future but it’s more likely to go away than go up. I’ve sent more ACH payments than you’ve had hot dinners, I guarantee it. No one fucking cares if it takes a day to get money or assets transferred when everyone is playing games with their debt anyway>>62283751I wish I could be dumb like you and think that actually means anything
>>62283669Based! That's why I like posting Chainlink videos. You can choose to watch or not. Thanks for posting a good reply in the Chainlink thread.
>>62283751>we know, it' is way over their head and way over yoursThat's the problem if the tech goes way over developer's heads how are they going to add it.CLPR only on Hedera stuff right now, they need to make integration easy and show examples.
>>62283424>chainlink buys back 1.1 million dollars of its token every weekand? they sell 280 million tokens per year
>>62284421to whom? the answer to that question will change everything you expect about Chainlink
>>62283783>No one fucking cares if it takes a day to get money or assets transferred when everyone is playing games with their debt anywayding ding ding, we have a winner here folks and let's take a step back and laugh our asses off at how a bunch of losers on the chan of all places became obsessed about a product that makes the world's largest banks marginally more efficient, if at all as that guy said, nobody in the real world gives a fuck about a small wait time to clear money. crypto bros like to paint it as banks being desperate for some new tech solution because they're desperate for narratives and new buyers. the reality is banks are thriving. that's why in 10 years of buzzwords all you have is some pilotsand then outside of big banks, no regular people are having to move money across countries on a regular basis, and anyone moving money in country can just use existing systems ie zelle, ach, etc. i could send a wire before end of business today and it will clear by tomorrow. and the fee is a static fee in usd, not some insane "gas" charge based on whether ethereum is pumping or not lmfao
>>62284459>duuuuuuude i'm in on LE SECRET>duuuuuuude whales are secretly ACCUMULATING bro give it a rest
>>62284529I'm trying to explain to you since you're a Chainlink fan - the tokens don't dump on the market. In fact usually the price goes up when they unlock tokens.
>>62284459To the exchanges under the counter
>>62284544>In fact usually the price goes up when they unlock tokens
>>62275380>>62276121HELLO???
>>62284544>I'm trying to explain to you since you're a Chainlink fan - the tokens don't dump on the market. In fact usually the price goes up when they unlock tokens.oh no worries dog i know exactly what you're trying to say. it's a spin job and you're sick for doing itthe thing is, you can't debate your way out of basic supply and demand. you can sell into uptrending markets as the team does, and then pay for a study to say it doesn't cause a price decrease thankfully tho no one is falling for that (see the chart). you see, your average investor looks at how weak, limp, and pathetic link is. they see that price action mimics the characteristics of its holders. they see that the boyscouts are...THE Cuckolds of crypto
